Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2026 Apr 23;18(4):e107623. doi: 10.7759/cureus.107623

A Case of Clinical and Viral Rebound Following Completion of a Five-Day Course of Ensitrelvir for COVID-19

Yu Kasamatsu 1,, Satoshi Shiraisi 2, Masato Uji 2, Masanori Kobayashi 2, Tetsushi Goto 1, Yoshikazu Hiura 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC13106963  PMID: 42038737

Abstract

Ensitrelvir inhibits the 3-chymotrypsin-like protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and accelerates viral clearance and symptom improvement through its potent antiviral activity. Reports of rebound after ensitrelvir treatment are scarce. This report presents a case of a healthcare worker in her 50s who had no significant underlying conditions. As a close contact, she underwent nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing after her sister was diagnosed with coronavirus disease. The test result was positive with a cycle threshold (Ct) value of 31.97 by using Cobas® liat. Ensitrelvir treatment was initiated because of a slight sore throat, and rapid improvement was observed starting the following day. Treatment was completed on day five. Examination on day six indicated that the symptoms had resolved. However, the sore throat recurred on day seven, antigen levels increased again, and fever and cough developed on day eight. On day nine, a Ct value of 16.6 was noted, suggesting a strongly positive result and rebound. She received five vaccine doses and had markedly high levels of anti-S immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, but her anti-N IgG antibodies were negative, indicating that she had a normal immune response and had not been infected with COVID-19. Her illness was mild, and symptoms peaked on day 11, without additional treatment. This case strongly suggests viral rebound and symptom relapse after ensitrelvir administration. Therefore, caution is warranted, as rebound may occur after ensitrelvir treatment, similar to that after nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment.

Keywords: covid-19, covid-19 relapse, ensitrelvir, rebound, viral infection

Introduction

Ensitrelvir is a relatively new antiviral drug that inhibits the 3-chymotrypsin-like protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and accelerates viral clearance and symptom improvement in mainly vaccinated individuals infected with the Omicron variant [1,2].

For some antiviral drugs, such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NIR/rtv), a "rebound phenomenon" has been reported, in which patients test positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or experience a recurrence of symptoms after completing a five-day course of treatment [3-7]. However, it remains unclear whether a rebound phenomenon occurs following treatment with ensitrelvir.

Herein, we report the first case of clinical and viral rebound after ensitrelvir treatment.

Case presentation

This case involved a woman in her 50s, employed as a physician, with no significant medical history, comorbidities, or history of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). She was a non-smoker and occasional drinker and had no possibility of pregnancy. She had received six doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, all Pfizer, with the last dose administered six months prior.

The patient's sister, who lived with her, had been diagnosed with COVID-19. As a close contact, the patient underwent a nasopharyngeal PCR test, which was positive (cycle threshold (Ct) value: 31.97; Cobas® liat). She had a slightly sore throat and desired early improvement; therefore, ensitrelvir treatment was initiated (day one). The patient's sore throat improved the following day. After completing the five-day course, the symptoms had resolved, as confirmed at a follow-up visit on day six. The quantitative antigen test (Lumipulse®) showed a low value (144.8 pg/mL), and she was scheduled to return to work on day seven.

However, she presented for re-evaluation on day seven because of the recurrence of a sore throat, along with low-grade fever and cough that began that morning. Her physical findings were as follows: body temperature of 37.9°C; peripheral capillary oxygen saturation of 97%; blood pressure of 114/64 mmHg; pulse rate of 80/min; and mild pharyngeal erythema. Laboratory tests revealed a white blood cell count of 7,000, with differential counts within the normal range. Lactate dehydrogenase level was 171 IU/L, and KL-6 level was 173 U/mL (Table 1). Chest radiography revealed no evidence of pneumonia (Figure 1).

Table 1. Laboratory data.

Patient's laboratory data show a slightly elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level and COVID-19 antigen titer exceeding the detection limit.

Parameter Result Reference Range
WBC 7070 3170-8400 /μL
RBC 389×104 372-506×104/μL
Hb 11.0 11.0-14.7 g/dL
Ht 34.9 35.2-46.7%
MCV 90 87-101 fl
Plt 24.8×104 16.7-39.0 /μL
Neu 70.6 39.7-71.2%
Lym 20.5 21.9-50.3%
Mono 7.9 4.2-9.6%
Eos 0.4 0.6-4.9%
Bas 0.6 0.02-0.07%
LDH 171 124-222 U/L
AST 15 8-38 U/L
ALT 8 4-44 U/L
Na 140 138-145 mEq/L
K 4.1 3.6-4.8 mEq/L
Cl 104 101-108 mEq/L
BUN 11.2 8.0-20.0 mg/dL
Cre 0.49 0.40-0.80 mg/dL
CRP 0.6 <0.26 mg/dL
Glu 109 73-109 mg/dL
HbA1c 5.6 4.6-6.2%
PT 10.3 9.9-11.8 sec
APTT 25 24.0-37.0 sec
D-dimer 0.7 <1.0 μg/mL
T-cho 219 150-219 mg/dL
KL-6 173 0-500 U/mL
SARS-COV-2 antigen titer >5000 <1.0 pg/mL
HBsAg (-) (-)
HCVAb (-) (-)
HIVAg・Ab (-) (-)

Figure 1. Clinical course.

Figure 1

Progression of symptoms, antigen levels, and viral load

Image created by the authors using PowerPoint 2016 (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA).

Although the symptoms had completely resolved after ensitrelvir administration, 48 hours after discontinuation, the sore throat recurred along with fever (37.9°C) and cough onset. Quantitative antigen levels increased significantly from 144.8 to ≥ 5,000, and Ct values rose markedly from 31.97 to 16.6 (Figure 2). This case strongly suggests viral rebound and symptom relapse after ensitrelvir administration. The patient showed no new signs of pneumonia and only mild symptoms that resolved spontaneously within a few days without additional treatment. She had no history or comorbidities suggesting immunodeficiency and tested negative for HIV, with high CD4 counts and anti-S IgG antibodies, indicating no immune compromise. Her anti-N IgG antibodies were also negative, confirming that this was the first infection.

Figure 2. Chest X-ray.

Figure 2

Chest radiography showed no abnormal shadow.

Discussion

Ensitrelvir is a relatively new antiviral drug for COVID-19, and this is the first case report of clinical and viral rebound. In the Phase 3 SCORPIO-SR trial, transient viral load increases were reported after dosing cessation (ensitrelvir 7.8% vs. placebo 4.7%); however, no reports of viral rebound accompanied by clinical rebound, as observed in this case, were documented [1]. Encitrelvir has a longer half-life (44-54 hours) than NIR/rtv (3.4-4.8 hours), suggesting that it is less prone to allowing a rebound [8]. Therefore, our case, featuring clinical rebound accompanied by viral rebound, is valuable.

For NIR/rtv, a drug in the same class, the EPIC-HR trial reported a rebound rate of 5.2% (3.8% in the placebo group) and symptom recurrence rate of 12.2% (16.1% in the placebo group) [3]. Another prospective observational study reported a symptom recurrence rate of 18.9% (24/127 cases) for NIR/rtv versus 7.0% (3/43 cases) for the control group (p = 0.06) [4]. Risk factors identified by Smith et al. included immunodeficiency (7.37), age between 18 and 65 years (3.09), Charlson comorbidity index > 6 (6.02), and steroid use (7.51) [6]. Camp et al. described a black female patient with underlying comorbidities and no prior infection [7]. Our case had sufficient antibody titres post vaccination and no comorbidities; however, certain patient characteristics, such as age, female sex, and lack of prior infection, correspond to previously reported rebound risks. Further studies are required to determine the frequency of rebound with encitrelvir and associated risk factors.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we report a case that strongly suggests viral rebound and symptom relapse after ensitrelvir administration. Ensitrelvir is a relatively new antiviral drug for COVID-19, and this is the first reported case of clinical and viral rebound. Therefore, caution is warranted, as rebound may occur after ensitrelvir treatment, similar to that after NIR/rtv treatment. Although rebound of ensitrelvir was thought to be unlikely due to the drug's long plasma half-life, further study on rebound cases is needed.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Yu Kasamatsu, Satoshi Shiraisi, Masato Uji, Masanori Kobayashi, Tetsushi Goto, Yoshikazu Hiura

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Yu Kasamatsu, Satoshi Shiraisi, Masato Uji, Masanori Kobayashi, Tetsushi Goto, Yoshikazu Hiura

Drafting of the manuscript:  Yu Kasamatsu, Satoshi Shiraisi, Masato Uji, Masanori Kobayashi, Tetsushi Goto, Yoshikazu Hiura

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Yu Kasamatsu, Satoshi Shiraisi, Masato Uji, Masanori Kobayashi, Tetsushi Goto, Yoshikazu Hiura

References

  • 1.Efficacy and safety of 5-day oral ensitrelvir for patients with mild to moderate COVID-19: the SCORPIO-SR randomized clinical trial. Yotsuyanagi H, Ohmagari N, Doi Y, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:0. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019: the phase 2b part of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study. Mukae H, Yotsuyanagi H, Ohmagari N, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76:1403–1411. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oral nirmatrelvir for high-risk, nonhospitalized adults with Covid-19. Hammond J, Leister-Tebbe H, Gardner A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1397–1408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2118542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Viral burden rebound in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 receiving oral antivirals in Hong Kong: a population-wide retrospective cohort study. Wong CK, Lau KT, Au IC, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23:683–695. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00873-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Factors associated with viral rebound among COVID-19 patients receiving oral antivirals. Chen PY, Wang JT, Chang SY, et al. J Formos Med Assoc. 2023;122:766–775. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.SARS-CoV-2 rebound with and without use of COVID-19 oral antivirals. Smith DJ, Lambrou A, Patel P. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72:1357–1364. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7251a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clinical rebound after treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in COVID-19. Camp D, Caputo M, Echevarria FM, Achenbach CJ. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24:963. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09842-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the novel antiviral agent ensitrelvir fumaric acid, a SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitor, in healthy adults. Shimizu R, Sonoyama T, Fukuhara T, Kuwata A, Matsuo Y, Kubota R. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66:0. doi: 10.1128/aac.00632-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES