Abstract
The effects of three different timeout durations were investigated in a group of 20 retarded, institutionalized subjects. Each subject received 1, 15, and 30 min of timeout in a design that was counterbalanced in terms of the order in which timeout durations were presented. Displays of deviant behavior—such as aggression, tantrums, and self-destruction—were followed by periods of isolation in a timeout room. A reversal design was employed such that return-to-baseline periods were instituted after each timeout period. The overall effect of timeout was to reduce significantly the rate of deviant behavior. On the average, 15 and 30 min produced a 35% decrease in deviant behavior with little difference between the effectiveness of 15 and 30 min. The range of effects in all timeout conditions varied widely. The sequence in which the 1-min duration was presented effected the direction of its effect. When it preceded the use of longer durations, 1 min was most effective. As it came later in the sequence, its suppressive characteristics became less reliable.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/770e0/770e0e047edbd61aa7a09e22bca371437d6f3640" alt="111"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97251/9725131934b7cfec0886f86d1533831a48ce8c68" alt="112"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4bb6/e4bb6ffa3e48103141b6c07bd6d872ff1401df98" alt="113"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/980e8/980e824995447e344f53f41d341c426f912a4c7e" alt="114"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8de32/8de321dedbd63e258733ffcb1905dea633a86592" alt="115"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86675/866751c87f14af3fa9b555b415e97a3a60f0b17a" alt="116"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bfa2/7bfa2b151fa272f38c5a0bc253aa27c2fd24a458" alt="117"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/146cc/146cc82bc037e24568e470a1e35dadc8ece88015" alt="118"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08601/08601937bce2c2c96722d2d91baf01ec84f29194" alt="119"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ae0f/2ae0ff64f5c82ca6679fc8a1927450bc2a3851a0" alt="120"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BEVAN W., ADAMSON R. Reinforcers and reinforcement: their relation to maze performance. J Exp Psychol. 1960 Apr;59:226–232. doi: 10.1037/h0045962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BURCHARD J., TYLER V., Jr THE MODIFICATION OF DELIQUENT BEHAVIOR THROUGH OPERANT CONDITIONING. Behav Res Ther. 1965 Apr;3:245–250. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(65)90033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bevan W. The contextual basis of behavior. Am Psychol. 1968 Oct;23(10):701–714. doi: 10.1037/h0026697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bostow D. E., Bailey J. B. Modification of severe disruptive and aggressive behavior using brief timeout and reinforcement procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Spring;2(1):31–37. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FERSTER C. B., APPEL J. B. Punishment of S delta responding in matching to sample by time out from positive reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jan;4:45–56. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giles D. K., Wolf M. M. Toilet training institutionalized, severe retardates: an application of operant behavior modification techniques. Am J Ment Defic. 1966 Mar;70(5):766–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawkins R. P., Peterson R. F., Schweid E., Bijou S. W. Behavior therapy in the home: amelioration of problem parent-child relations with the parent in a therapeutic role. J Exp Child Psychol. 1966 Sep;4(1):99–107. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(66)90054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leitenberg H. Is time-out from positive reinforcement an aversive event? A review of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull. 1965 Dec;64(6):428–441. doi: 10.1037/h0022657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Risley T. R. The effects and side effects of punishing the autistic behaviors of a deviant child. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):21–34. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sailor W., Guess D., Rutherford G., Baer D. M. Control of tantrum behavior by operant techniques during experimental verbal training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Fall;1(3):237–243. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WILLIAMS C. D. The elimination of tantrum behavior by extinction procedures. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1959 Sep;59:269–269. doi: 10.1037/h0046688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wahler R. G., Winkel G. H., Peterson R. F., Morrison D. C. Mothers as behavior therapists for their own children. Behav Res Ther. 1965 Sep;3(2):113–124. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(65)90015-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ZIMMERMAN J., BAYDAN N. T. PUNISHMENT OF S-DELTA RESPONDING OF HUMANS IN CONDITIONAL MATCHING TO SAMPLE BY TIME-OUT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Oct;6:589–597. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ZIMMERMAN J., FERSTER C. B. Intermittent punishment of Sdelta responding in matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:349–356. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]