Abstract
Background
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) shows high incidence and mortality worldwide. TRIM26, an E3 ubiquitin ligase within the TRIM family, exerts regulatory functions in various tumors. This study analyzed the expression patterns and potential functions of TRIM26 in HCC based on transcriptomic data.
Methods
First, the differential expression of TRIM26 between tumor and normal tissues was analyzed using the TCGA dataset and cross‐validated using TIMER 2.0 and HCCDB. Enrichment analysis evaluated its association with hallmark pathways including Wnt/β‐catenin. A gene functional interaction network was built via GeneMANIA to explore TRIM26 and the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway. Immune cell infiltration was quantified by ssGSEA for immune microenvironment correlation. scRNA‐seq data established an HCC single‐cell atlas to define TRIM26 distribution across cell subsets. AUCell was used to assess TRIM26‐pathway associations within specific cell types.
Results
TRIM26 was significantly upregulated in HCC tissues, and its high expression correlated with enrichment of oncogenic pathways including Wnt/β‐catenin, G2/M checkpoint, and TGF‐β. GeneMANIA showed that TRIM26 interacted directly or indirectly with Wnt/β‐catenin core molecules, implying its regulatory role. TRIM26 expression was closely linked to infiltration of activated B cells, CD8+ T cells, and NKT cells. Single‐cell analysis revealed TRIM26 was mainly expressed in hepatocytes, T/NK cells, myeloid cells, and B cells. Importantly, in hepatocytes, TRIM26 strongly correlated with Wnt/β‐catenin activity, which was much higher in tumor hepatocytes than normal ones.
Conclusion
In HCC, TRIM26 was abnormally overexpressed. TRIM26 may regulate tumor progression via the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway and is linked to immune infiltration. Thus, TRIM26 is a potential therapeutic target for HCC.
Keywords: HCC, immune infiltration, single-cell analysis, TRIM26, Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway
1. Introduction
Globally, an estimated 906,000 new cases of HCC and 830,000 related deaths were recorded in 2020 [1]. As the sixth most frequently diagnosed cancer [2] and the third leading cause of global cancer‐associated mortality, HCC has shown a rapidly increasing incidence in recent years [3]. Due to the absence or atypia of symptoms, the diagnosis of HCC is often challenging [4]. Early diagnosis of HCC remains challenging, largely due to the absence or atypical presentation of initial symptoms. Common early manifestations include abdominal pain, weight loss, and fatigue, whereas advanced disease may present with jaundice, ascites, and fever [5, 6]. At present, surgery remains the primary treatment method for achieving long‐term survival of HCC patients; however, the 5‐year postoperative survival rate of HCC ranges from 20% to 60% [7–9]. A lack of typical manifestations in early‐stage HCC often leads to a late diagnosis, with only 30%–40% of patients considered eligible for surgical treatment [10, 11].
As a member of the TRIM family, TRIM26 shares similar structural characteristics with other TRIM proteins [12, 13]. Previous studies have found that TRIM26 promotes the ubiquitination of β‐catenin, thereby suppressing the progression of HCC [14]. Functioning as an E3 ligase, TRIM26 exerts inhibitory effects on liver cancer by facilitating the ubiquitination and degradation of ZEB1. It has also been reported to co‐regulate ZEB1 expression in coordination with the deubiquitinase USP39, thereby influencing the progression of HCC [15]. In various cancers, TRIM26 overexpression can inhibit the proliferation of various types of cancer cells [15–17]. The Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway is a key driver of HCC initiation and progression [18]. However, whether TRIM26 participates in regulating this pathway in a broader manner beyond its direct control of β‐catenin, as well as its potential role in shaping the tumor immune microenvironment, remains largely unexplored. Therefore, a comprehensive investigation into the expression pattern of TRIM26 in HCC and its association with the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway is crucial for elucidating its potential value as a therapeutic target.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the expression pattern of TRIM26 in HCC and its association with tumor biological behavior. Multiple public databases were utilized to develop a single‐cell atlas of HCC, enabling systematic evaluation of the correlations between TRIM26 expression and key features including immune infiltration and Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway activity. This framework is expected to deepen the understanding of the immunobiology of HCC, providing novel insights for the development of precise prognostic tools and therapeutic strategies in HCC treatment.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Acquisition
The RNA‐seq data corresponding to TCGA‐liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) were acquired through the application programming interface (API) of the TCGA GDC. After eliminating samples lacking clinical follow‐up information, those with a survival of > 0 days were kept. Ensembl identifiers were converted into gene symbols. For genes matched to multiple gene symbols, the maximum expression value was retained. After initial filtering, 365 primary tumor samples were included in the study.
The scRNA‐seq data of eight primary liver cancer samples and eight matched adjacent nontumor liver samples in GSE149614 were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database [19]. The expression data of TRIM26 were extracted from the TIMER2.0 database [20] (http://timer.cistrome.org/).
2.2. Filtering, Dimensionality Reduction, and Clustering
The scRNA‐seq data from GEO were preprocessed. The data were read via the Read10X function in the Seurat package [21]. Quality control filtering was performed according to the following criteria: genes detected in fewer than three cells were excluded, and cells were retained if they expressed between 200 and 10,000 genes and had a mitochondrial gene proportion of < 15%. Data normalization was conducted with the SCTransform function. Subsequently, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the RunPCA function, followed by batch effect removal employing the harmony package [22]. The Top 30 PCs were subsequently used for UMAP dimensionality reduction. Cell clusters were identified via the FindNeighbors and FindClusters functions (at resolution of 0.1). Finally, cell types were annotated by referencing canonical marker genes from the CellMarker2.0 database [23]. Quality control indicators for different cell subpopulations are shown in Figure S1.
2.3. Pathway Analysis and Differential Gene Enrichment Analysis
HALLMARK pathway scores was calculated using the GSVA package [24], with gene sets sourced from the MSigDB. The TCGA cancer samples were assigned based on the median TRIM26 expression into low‐ and high‐expression groups. Differential analysis was conducted utilizing the limma package [25] under the criteria of FDR of < 0.05 and |log2 F C| > log2 (1.5). GSEA was subsequently conducted with the clusterProfiler package [24].
2.4. Immune Infiltration Analysis
The enrichment scores of immune cells in each sample were calculated using ssGSEA, with immune cell gene derived from the reference literature [26].
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted in R language. Intergroup comparisons of continuous variables were performed using the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test, and correlations were assessed using Spearman′s method. p < 0.05 signified statistical significance.
3. Results
3.1. Expression Characteristics of TRIM26 in Pan‐Cancer and HCC and Its Clinical Correlation
TRIM26 expression data were acquired from the TIMER2.0 database. Elevated expression of TRIM26 was observed in multiple tumor types in comparison with the normal group, including LIHC, BRCA, CESC, CHOL, ESCA, and STAD (Figure 1A). Consistently, analysis based on the HCCDB database revealed pronounced upregulation of TRIM26 in HCC than in the adjacent normal group across several datasets (HCCDB1, HCCDB4, HCCDB13, and HCCDB18) (Figure 1B). Furthermore, a positive correlation between TRIM26 expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) in LIHC, LUSC, LUAD, and UCEC was observed (Figure 1C).
Figure 1.

TRIM26 expression in pan‐cancer and liver hepatocellular carcinoma. (A–B) TRIM26 expression in pan‐cancer. (C) Radar chart showing the association between TMB, MSI, and TRIM26 expression.
3.2. Enrichment Analysis of TRIM26 Expression and Wnt/β‐catenin Signaling Pathway Activity
Based on the TCGA dataset, tumor samples were stratified based on median TRIM26 level into high‐ and low‐expression groups. According to differential expression analysis, we identified 37 downregulated and 2239 upregulated genes. Enrichment analysis demonstrated that these DEGs were closely involved in biological processes (BPs) including Wnt signaling, histone modification, and DNA replication (Figure 2A,B). Furthermore, GSEA confirmed significant enrichment of the Wnt signaling pathway in samples with high TRIM26 expression. Subsequent correlation analysis using Spearman′s method revealed a significant positive association between TRIM26 expression and activity scores of both the Wnt signaling pathway and some other HALLMARK pathways (Figure 2C).
Figure 2.

GSEA and pathway correlation analysis of TRIM26 high‐ and low‐expression groups. (A–B) Enrichment analysis of DEGs between the expression groups of TRIM26. (C) Correlation between TRIM26 and hallmark pathway scores.
3.3. Association Analysis of TRIM26 Expression and Immune Cell Infiltration in HCC
Immune cell infiltration in both high and low TRIM26 expression groups was computed via ssGSEA and compared. It was observed that samples with lower TRIM26 expression had markedly higher infiltration of activated B cells, activated CD8 T cells, regulatory T cells, mast cells, macrophages, and neutrophils (Figure 3A). Furthermore, correlation analysis between TRIM26 expression and immune cell infiltration demonstrated that TRIM26 expression was markedly linked to various immune cell types, including NKT cells, activated B cells, and activated CD8 T cells (Figure 3B).
Figure 3.

Correlation analysis of immune cell infiltration. (A) Differences in immune infiltration between the expression groups of TRIM26. (B) Association between TRIM26 and immune cell scores. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
3.4. The Association Between TRIM26 and the Wnt/β‐catenin Pathway in HCC Based on GeneMANIA Analysis
To investigate whether TRIM26 was involved in regulating the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway, the TRIM26 gene and the HALLMARK_WNT_BETA_CATENIN_SIGNALING gene set were both imported into the GeneMANIA platform to construct a gene functional interaction network (Figure 4). The results showed that TRIM26 was functionally connected with key genes (e.g. FRAT1, NCSTN, and CTNNB1) in the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway, suggesting that TRIM26 may affect the activity of core components of this signaling pathway.
Figure 4.

Network diagram of TRIM26 and genes linked to Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway; lines of different colors represent different approaches to obtain correlations.
3.5. Construction of an HCC Atlas Based on scRNA‐Seq Data and Cell Type Distribution Characteristics of TRIM26
After cell filtering, data standardization, dimensionality reduction, and cluster analysis, 54,481 high‐quality cells were retained for subsequent analyses. Based on the expression of classical marker genes in each cluster, the cells were classified into seven major immune cell types, including hepatocytes, T/NK cells, myeloid cells, fibroblasts, plasma cells, endothelial cells, and B cells (Figure 5A–C). Specifically, hepatocytes were identified by the expression of ALB, SERPINA1, and HNF4A; myeloid cells were identified by the expression of CD68, AIF1, and CD163; endothelial cells were identified by the expression of EGFL7, ENG, and VWF; fibroblasts were identified by the expression of ACTA2, COL1A2, and DCN; and B cells were identified by the expression of CD79A, CCR7, and BANK1 (Figure 5B). Analysis of the seven immune cell types showed that hepatocytes and T/NK cells accounted for a relatively higher proportion (Figure 5C). Further analysis of the expression of TRIM26 in different cell types showed that TRIM26 was mainly expressed in myeloid cells, B cells, hepatocytes, and T/NK cells (Figure 5D).
Figure 5.

Single‐cell atlas of HCC. (A) UMAP plot of annotated cell subsets; (B) specifically high‐expressed genes in different cell types; (C) proportion of cell subsets in different samples; and (D) TRIM26 expression in different cell clusters.
3.6. Correlation Between TRIM26 and Hallmarks in Hepatocytes
To characterize hallmark pathway enrichment patterns across different cellular states, we performed pathway activity analysis on single‐cell hepatocyte samples using the AUCell algorithm. Following the calculation of enrichment score for all hallmark pathways, Spearman correlation between TRIM26 expression and the enrichment scores was further calculated (Figure 6A). We found that TRIM26 was significantly correlated with multiple cancer‐related pathways, with strong positive correlation with signaling pathways such as HALLMARK_TGF_BETA_SIGNALING, HALLMARK_WNT_BETA_CATENIN_SIGNALING, and HALLMARK_G2M_CHECKPOINT. Notably, the WNT/β‐catenin signaling pathway enrichment score was significantly higher in tumor‐derived hepatocytes than in normal hepatocytes (Figure 6B,C). Together with the positive correlation between TRIM26 and pathway activity, these findings showed that TRIM26 was possibly functionally associated with the activation of this pathway, and that the WNT/β‐catenin signaling pathway may be a potential mediating pathway for its involvement in tumor BPs.
Figure 6.

The correlation between TRIM26 and hallmark. (A) Spearman correlation between TRIM26 expression and hallmark enrichment scores in hepatocytes. (B–C) Expression of genes associated with WNT_BETA_CATENIN_SIGNALING in hepatocytes from normal and tumor groups.
4. Discussion
HCC is the most frequent liver cancer type worldwide [27–29]. At present, the 5‐year survival rate for HCC patients is approximately 20%, and the prognostic outcomes vary significantly across different tumor stages [30–32]. Therefore, early detection and diagnosis are crucial for improving prognosis. Here, this study systematically characterized the expression profile and biological functions of TRIM26 in HCC. Multicenter data analysis revealed that TRIM26 was significantly upregulated in HCC tissues. Importantly, high TRIM26 expression was closely linked to Wnt/β‐catenin pathway activity and infiltration of multiple immune cell types in HCC. Single‐cell analysis further revealed that TRIM26 was primarily expressed in hepatocytes, T/NK cells, myeloid cells, and B cells. Particularly, its expression was positively correlated with Wnt/β‐catenin pathway activity in hepatocytes. These findings suggest that TRIM26 may serve as a key molecular link between the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway and the tumor immune microenvironment. It holds promise as a potential therapeutic target for HCC and a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response, laying a theoretical foundation for subsequent functional validation and clinical translational research.
As an E3 ubiquitin ligase within the TRIM family, TRIM26 plays regulatory roles in various BPs, for instance, cell cycle, proliferation, DNA repair, ferroptosis, and autophagy [33]. In cancer, TRIM26 has been described as a tumor‐suppressor in HCC, where it was found to promote ferroptosis, and its downregulation was associated with poor prognosis in HCC [34, 35]. This tumor‐suppressive role was further supported by another study demonstrating that TRIM26 inhibited the growth and migration of HCC by ubiquitinating and degrading ZEB1, a key oncogenic transcription factor for HCC growth and metastasis [15, 36]. It has also been reported that TRIM26 exhibited oncogenic effects on different tumor types. The AKT/GSK3β/β‐catenin pathway could be blocked upon TRIM26 knockdown, thereby suppressing bladder cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [17]. These aforementioned results suggest that the oncogenic or tumor‐suppressive role of TRIM26 may be dependent on the type of tissue, cell, or tumor. Though existing studies revealed the involvement of some TRIM family proteins in tumor progression by regulating the Wnt pathway, whether TRIM26 participates in tumor progression by regulating the Wnt pathway remains unclear.
The Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway plays a crucial role in both physiological and pathological processes [37–40]. In the liver, this pathway participates in hepatic metabolic zonation, homeostatic renewal, and postinjury regeneration [41] and regulates liver physiological functions [42]. Additionally, activation of this pathway is essential for coordinating liver regeneration, especially after partial hepatectomy or toxic injury [43]. At the pathological level, aberrant activation of the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway has been considered one of the major genetic alterations in human HCC as it can synergize with multiple signaling pathways to promote HCC formation and exert carcinogenic effects through downstream effectors [44]. However, though aberrant pathway activation might serve as a hallmark for various tumors and liver diseases, its functions are highly complex, context‐dependent, and tightly regulated, influencing cellular functions and intercellular adhesion [45].
Regarding its regulatory mechanisms, ubiquitination serves as a core process controlling β‐catenin levels within the pathway. In the absence of Wnt signaling, β‐catenin is sequentially phosphorylated by CK1 and GSK3, subsequently recognized by the E3 ligase β‐Trcp for ubiquitination, and ultimately degraded by the 26S proteasome [46]. Furthermore, multiple proteins participate in disease processes by regulating this pathway. Specifically, highly expressed USP25 has been shown to interact with TRIM21 to activate the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway and downstream proteins, thereby promoting the proliferation and migration of liver cancer cells and contributing to a poor prognosis [37]. Notably, TRIM26 has also been linked to this pathway, as its deletion can reduce β‐catenin ubiquitination in hepatocytes and promote hepatocyte proliferation through Wnts secreted by M1 macrophages, suggesting that loss or inhibition of TRIM26 may contribute to liver cancer [12]. However, in our study, TRIM26 was found to be upregulated in HCC and positively correlated with Wnt/β‐catenin activity, a finding that appears to contrast with its role as a tumor‐suppressor that promotes β‐catenin degradation. Two potential explanations may account for this discrepancy. First, the functional role of TRIM26 may be cell type–specific. For instance, TRIM26 deficiency in macrophages has been shown to enhance M1 polarization and Wnt secretion, activating Wnt signaling in adjacent hepatocytes [12], suggesting that immune‐derived signaling could drive the observed correlation. Additionally, a feedback mechanism may exist wherein abnormal Wnt activation, which is typically driven by CTNNB1 or AXIN1 mutations [47, 48], could induce compensatory TRIM26 upregulation. However, mutant β‐catenin evades degradation [12], leading to coexistence of high TRIM26 levels and sustained pathway activity. Collectively, the function of TRIM26 in HCC might be context‐dependent, which, however, requires further study in a cell type–specific manner.
In this study, TRIM26 was mainly expressed in myeloid cells, B cells, hepatocytes, and T/NK cells. T cells can be divided into αβ and γδ subtypes, among which γδ T cells account for approximately 15%–25% of liver T cells. In liver diseases, these cells can both exert protective effects and cause detrimental impacts, showing dual immune functions [49]. NKT cells, a subset of T lymphocytes and the most abundant lymphocyte population in the liver, are characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity and coexpression of surface markers typical of both T cells and NK cells [49]. Hepatocytes are the primary cellular component of the liver, and play a key role in liver regeneration due to their distinctive proliferative ability [50]. This cell type maintains lipid homeostasis by regulating lipases, which is crucial for energy supply and metabolic substrates in liver regeneration [51, 52]. The expression of TRIM26 is significantly correlated with various immune cell types, such as activated B cells, activated CD8+ T cells, and NKT cells. As antigen‐presenting cells (APCs), B cells can activate T cells and enhance cellular immune responses [53]. Activated B cells differentiate into plasma cells, which secrete antitumor antibodies to act directly on tumor cells and inhibit their growth [53]. Studies showed that in HCC, activated CD8+ T cells regulate immune responses through interactions with other immune cells (e.g., dendritic cells and regulatory T cells) [54]. NKT cells recognize lipid antigens presented by CD1d molecules through their T cell receptors (TCRs), thereby activating antitumor immune responses. This recognition mechanism enables NKT cells to respond rapidly and attack liver cancer cells [55]. In HCC, antitumor effects are mediated by NKT cells via direct cytotoxicity and immunomodulatory mechanisms. Studies indicated that NKT cell activity is linked to patient prognosis, with elevated infiltration levels typically associated with improved clinical outcomes [56]. The activity of some other immune cells is suppressed by regulatory T cells via direct cell contact and secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines such as TGF‐β and IL‐10 [57]. Mast cells regulate the TME and promote tumor progression by secreting various cytokines (e.g., histamine, IL‐4, IL‐6, and IL‐10) and chemokines (e.g., CXCL10, CCL3, and CCL5) [58].
Despite the progress made in analyzing the role of TRIM26 in HCC and its association with the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway, some limitations should be acknowledged. First, this study primarily analyzed transcriptome data from public databases and lacked direct validation of TRIM26 function through in vitro and in vivo experiments. Subsequent work will employ molecular biological approaches such as gene knockdown/overexpression, Western blot analysis, and luciferase reporter assays to validate TRIM26′s regulatory role in Wnt/β‐catenin pathway activity within HCC cell lines. Secondly, although scRNA‐seq analysis revealed the expression distribution of TRIM26 across different cell subpopulations, it failed to elucidate its specific functions in cell–cell interactions. Moving forward, we plan to integrate ligand–receptor analysis tools with coculture systems to explore the regulatory networks of TRIM26 within the tumor immune microenvironment. Third, the public databases utilized in this study were primarily derived from Western populations or specific cohorts, potentially introducing sample selection bias. Subsequent validation should incorporate independent, multicenter clinical cohorts with large sample sizes and more comprehensive patient prognostic information to assess the clinical predictive value of TRIM26. Finally, although this study observed correlations between TRIM26 expression and multiple immune cell infiltration levels, we did not probe into the specific molecular mechanisms. Therefore, future studies are encouraged to systematically evaluate the impact of TRIM26 on immune cell functional states and antitumor immune responses using flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and in vivo tumor models.
5. Conclusion
Overall, this study systematically described the expression pattern and clinical significance of TRIM26 in HCC. According to integrated transcriptomic analyses, TRIM26 was significantly upregulated in HCC tissues and exhibited a positive correlation with Wnt/β‐catenin pathway activity. Single‐cell profiling data further localized TRIM26 expression primarily to hepatocytes, T/NK cells, myeloid cells, and B cells. Hepatocyte‐specific expression was positively associated with the Wnt pathway activity. These findings provided new insights into the cell type–specific role of TRIM26 in HCC and highlighted its potential as a molecular link between Wnt signaling and the tumor immune microenvironment. From a translational perspective, TRIM26 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker, predictor of immunotherapy response, and therapeutic target candidate. Future functional studies are warranted to validate its mechanistic role and clinical applicability.
Nomenclature
- APCs
Antigen‐presenting cells
- API
Application programming interface
- BRCA
Breast invasive carcinoma
- CESC
Cervical squamous cell carcinoma
- CHOL
Cholangiocarcinoma
- ESCA
Esophageal carcinoma
- FDR
False discovery rate
- FC
Fold change
- GDC
Genomic Data Commons
- GEO
Gene Expression Omnibus
- GSEA
Gene set enrichment analysis
- HCC
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- HBV
Hepatitis B virus
- HCV
Hepatitis C virus
- LIHC
Liver hepatocellular carcinoma
- LUSC
Lung squamous cell carcinoma
- LUAD
Lung adenocarcinoma
- MSigDB
Molecular Signatures Database
- MASH
Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis
- MSI
Microsatellite instability
- NKT
Natural killer T
- ssGSEA
Single‐sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
- scRNA‐seq
Single‐cell RNA sequencing
- STAD
Stomach adenocarcinoma
- TCGA
The Cancer Genome Atlas
- TCRs
T cell receptors
- TMB
Tumor mutation burden
- UCEC
Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma
- ZEB1
Zinc finger E‐box‐binding homeobox 1
Author Contributions
Conghua Song and Xiaomei Li designed this study. Zijun Hou acquired and interpreted the data. Huifeng Wu and Conghua Song drafted and revised the manuscript. Conghua Song and Zijun Hou contributed to this study equally.
Funding
This study was supported by the Collaborative Project Between the Hospital and College of Putian University (2024106); the Joint Fund Project for Scientific and Technological Innovation in the Field of Medical and Health Care in Putian (2024SJYL079); the Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project (2024GGA089); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82200676); and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Putian City (2023SZ3001PTXY01 and 2025NJYL069).
Disclosure
All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Ethics Statement
Ethical approval was not required for this study because it is not involved in any human or animal experiments.
Consent
The authors have nothing to report.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting Information Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section. Figure S1: Quality control metrics across cell clusters. (A) Violin plot of the number of genes detected per cell (nFeature_RNA); (B) violin plot of total UMI counts per cell (nCount_RNA) grouped by cluster; (C) violin plot of the percentage of mitochondrial gene expression relative to all genes per cell; and (D) UMAP visualization of the cell subpopulations.
Acknowledgments
The authors have nothing to report.
Song, Conghua , Hou, Zijun , Wu, Huifeng , Li, Xiaomei , Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Role of TRIM26 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Association With the Wnt/β‐catenin Signaling Pathway, Human Mutation, 2026, 3090777, 12 pages, 2026. 10.1155/humu/3090777
Guest Editor: Peipei Gong
Contributor Information
Conghua Song, Email: kesongs@ptu.edu.cn.
Xiaomei Li, Email: xmlee151@ptu.edu.cn.
Peipei Gong, Email: ntgpp@ntu.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the [GSE149614] repository, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE149614].
References
- 1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R. L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., and Bray F., Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. (2021) 71, no. 3, 209–249, 10.3322/caac.21660, 33538338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Feng F. and Zhao Y., Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment, Medical Principles and Practice: International Journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre. (2024) 33, no. 5, 414–423, 10.1159/000539349, 38772352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Alawyia B. and Constantinou C., Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review on Current Knowledge and Future Prospects, Current Treatment Options in Oncology. (2023) 24, no. 7, 711–724, 10.1007/s11864-023-01098-9, 37103744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Shen H., Wang Z., Ren S., Wang W., Duan L., Zhu D., Zhang C., and Duan Y., Prognostic Biomarker MITD1 and Its Correlation With Immune Infiltrates in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), International Immunopharmacology. (2020) 81, 106222, 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106222, 32007795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chan Y. T., Zhang C., Wu J., Lu P., Xu L., Yuan H., Feng Y., Chen Z. S., and Wang N., Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Therapeutic Options in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Molecular Cancer. (2024) 23, no. 1, 10.1186/s12943-024-02101-z, 39242496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Khorshed F., Medhat A. M., Hamdy G. M., El-Dabaa E., Hammad H., Abd Elhameed H. A. H., and Saber M., Novel Perspective of Regulating P53/Bcl2/Caspase-3 via In Vitro Targeted AFP Gene Knocks Out in HepG2 Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9 Editing Tool, Current Gene Therapy. (2025) 25, 10.2174/0115665232366303250529164610, 40511828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kim S., Park J., Choi W. M., Lee D., Shim J. H., Kim K. M., Lim Y. S., Lee H. C., Kim K. H., and Choi J., 15-Year Trends in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Epidemiology, Treatment, and Outcomes From a Hospital-Based Registry, Gut and Liver. (2025) 19, no. 5, 746–757, 10.5009/gnl240599, 40369856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Thandra K. C., Barsouk A., Saginala K., Aluru J. S., Rawla P., and Barsouk A., Epidemiology of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression, Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. (2020) 6, no. 4, 289–294, 10.5114/ceh.2020.102153, 33511275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wang L., Ma X., Chen Y., Zhang J., Zhang J., Wang W., and Chen S., MiR-145-5p Suppresses Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression by Targeting ABHD17C, Oncologie. (2022) 24, no. 4, 897–912, 10.32604/oncologie.2022.025693. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wang Z., Qin H., Liu S., Sheng J., and Zhang X., Precision Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Chinese Medical Journal. (2023) 136, no. 10, 1155–1165, 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002641, 36939276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chen C., Gu J., Wang J., Wu Y., Yang A., Chen T., Zhou T., and Liu Z., Physcion 8-O-β-Glucopyranoside Ameliorates Liver Fibrosis Through Inflammation Inhibition by Regulating SIRT3-Mediated NF-κB P65 Nuclear Expression, International Immunopharmacology. (2021) 90, 107206, 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107206, 33246826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Li T., Zhong W., Li M., Shao Z., Zhang G., Wang W., Gao Z., Tan X., Xu Z., Luo F., and Song G., TRIM26 Deficiency Enhancing Liver Regeneration Through Macrophage Polarization and β-catenin Pathway Activation, Cell Death & Disease. (2024) 15, no. 6, 10.1038/s41419-024-06798-0, 38926362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jia X., Zhao C., and Zhao W., Emerging Roles of MHC Class I Region-Encoded E3 Ubiquitin Ligases in Innate Immunity, Frontiers in Immunology. (2021) 12, 687102, 10.3389/fimmu.2021.687102, 34177938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wang W., Lei Y., Zhang G., Li X., Yuan J., Li T., Zhong W., Zhang Y., Tan X., and Song G., USP39 Stabilizes β-catenin by Deubiquitination and Suppressing E3 Ligase TRIM26 Pre-mRNA Maturation to Promote HCC Progression, Cell Death & Disease. (2023) 14, no. 1, 10.1038/s41419-023-05593-7, 36707504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Li X., Yuan J., Song C., Lei Y., Xu J., Zhang G., Wang W., and Song G., Deubiquitinase USP39 and E3 Ligase TRIM26 Balance the Level of ZEB1 Ubiquitination and Thereby Determine the Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Cell Death and Differentiation. (2021) 28, no. 8, 2315–2332, 10.1038/s41418-021-00754-7, 33649471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wang K., Chai L., Qiu Z., Zhang Y., Gao H., and Zhang X., Overexpression of TRIM26 Suppresses the Proliferation, Metastasis, and Glycolysis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Cells, Journal of Cellular Physiology. (2019) 234, no. 10, 19019–19027, 10.1002/jcp.28541, 2-s2.0-85068214352, 30927273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Xie X., Li H., Pan J., and Han X., Knockdown of TRIM26 Inhibits the Proliferation, Migration and Invasion of Bladder Cancer Cells Through the Akt/GSK3β/β-catenin Pathway, Chemico-Biological Interactions. (2021) 337, 109366, 10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109366, 33549581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gajos-Michniewicz A. and Czyz M., WNT/β-catenin Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Aberrant Activation, Pathogenic Roles, and Therapeutic Opportunities, Genes & Diseases. (2024) 11, no. 2, 727–746, 10.1016/j.gendis.2023.02.050, 37692481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Pan M., Chen P., Zhang Q., Yang Y., Hu W., Hu G., Wang R., and Chen X., Comprehensive Profiling of Cell Subsets of Gastric Cancer and Liver Metastasis Based on Single Cell RNA-Sequencing Analysis, Translational Cancer Research. (2024) 13, no. 1, 330–347, 10.21037/tcr-23-1532, 38410212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Duan X., Wu R., Zhang M., Li K., Yu L., Sun H., Hao X., and Wang C., The Heterogeneity of NOTCH1 to Tumor Immune Infiltration in Pan-Cancer, Scientific Reports. (2024) 14, no. 1, 28071, 10.1038/s41598-024-79883-1, 39543218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wang X., Li P., Ji H., Xu Z., and Xing H., Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Over-Activated Reactive Oxygen Species Pathway in Hepatocytes in the Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Scientific Reports. (2024) 14, no. 1, 29809, 10.1038/s41598-024-81481-0, 39616235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zulibiya A., Wen J., Yu H., Chen X., Xu L., Ma X., and Zhang B., Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Potential for Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Tetralogy of Fallot, Congenital Heart Disease. (2023) 18, no. 6, 611–625, 10.32604/chd.2023.047689. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhong J., Pan R., Gao M., Mo Y., Peng X., Liang G., Chen Z., du J., and Huang Z., Identification and Validation of a T Cell Marker Gene-Based Signature to Predict Prognosis and Immunotherapy Response in Gastric Cancer, Scientific Reports. (2023) 13, no. 1, 21357, 10.1038/s41598-023-48930-8, 38049463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tang K., Liu M., and Zhang C., Construction of a Prognostic Model and Identification of Key Genes in Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Multi-Omics Data, Scientific Reports. (2025) 15, no. 1, 13393, 10.1038/s41598-025-98038-4, 40251374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Song Z., Yu J., Wang M., Shen W., Wang C., Lu T., Shan G., Dong G., Wang Y., and Zhao J., CHDTEPDB: Transcriptome Expression Profile Database and Interactive Analysis Platform for Congenital Heart Disease, Congenital Heart Disease. (2023) 18, no. 6, 693–701, 10.32604/chd.2024.048081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Charoentong P., Finotello F., Angelova M., Mayer C., Efremova M., Rieder D., Hackl H., and Trajanoski Z., Pan-Cancer Immunogenomic Analyses Reveal Genotype-Immunophenotype Relationships and Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Blockade, Cell Reports. (2017) 18, no. 1, 248–262, 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.019, 2-s2.0-85009106590, 28052254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Llovet J. M., Kelley R. K., Villanueva A., Singal A. G., Pikarsky E., Roayaie S., Lencioni R., Koike K., Zucman-Rossi J., and Finn R. S., Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Nature Reviews Disease Primers. (2021) 7, no. 1, 10.1038/s41572-020-00240-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhang J., Song Q., Wu M., and Zheng W., The Emerging Roles of Exosomes in the Chemoresistance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Current Medicinal Chemistry. (2021) 28, no. 1, 93–109, 10.2174/0929867327666200130103206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Liu R., Li Y., Wu A., Kong M., Ding W., Hu Z., Chen L., Cai W., and Wang F., Identification of Plasma hsa_circ_0005397 and Combined With Serum AFP, AFP-L3 as Potential Biomarkers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Frontiers in Pharmacology. (2021) 12, 639963, 10.3389/fphar.2021.639963, 33679420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhao J., Gao J., Liu W., and Sun J., Dynamic Conditional Survival Nomogram for Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis, Discover Oncology. (2025) 16, no. 1, 10.1007/s12672-025-02642-9, 40399541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wu M., Miao H., Fu R., Zhang J., and Zheng W., Hepatic Stellate Cell: A Potential Target for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Current Molecular Pharmacology. (2020) 13, no. 4, 261–272, 10.2174/1874467213666200224102820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yao M., Sai W., Zheng W., Wang L., Dong Z., and Yao D., Secretory Clusterin as a Novel Molecular-Targeted Therapy for Inhibiting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth, Current Medicinal Chemistry. (2020) 27, no. 20, 3290–3301, 10.2174/0929867326666190624161158, 31232234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zou J., Niu K., Lu T., Kan J., Cheng H., and Xu L., The Multifunction of TRIM26: From Immune Regulation to Oncology, Protein and Peptide Letters. (2024) 31, no. 6, 424–436, 10.2174/0109298665311516240621114519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zhang J., Zhou Y., Feng J., Xu X., Wu J., and Guo C., Deciphering Roles of TRIMs as Promising Targets in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Advances and Future Directions, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. (2023) 167, 115538, 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115538, 37729731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Wang Y., He D., Yang L., Wen B., Dai J., Zhang Q., Kang J., He W., Ding Q., and He D., TRIM26 Functions as a Novel Tumor Suppressor of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Downregulation Contributes to Worse Prognosis, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. (2015) 463, no. 3, 458–465, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.05.117, 2-s2.0-84930931164, 26043685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhou Y., Lin F., Wan T., Chen A., Wang H., Jiang B., Zhao W., Liao S., Wang S., Li G., Xu Z., Wang J., Zhang J., Ma H., Lin D., and Li Q., ZEB1 Enhances Warburg Effect to Facilitate Tumorigenesis and Metastasis of HCC by Transcriptionally Activating PFKM, Theranostics. (2021) 11, no. 12, 5926–5938, 10.7150/thno.56490, 33897890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Liu Y., Ma J., Lu S., He P., and Dong W., USP25 Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression by Interacting With TRIM21 via the Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Pathway, Chinese Medical Journal. (2023) 136, no. 18, 2229–2242, 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002714, 37439386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bakrania A., To J., Zheng G., and Bhat M., Targeting Wnt-β-catenin Signaling Pathway for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Nanomedicine, Gastro Hep Advances. (2023) 2, no. 7, 948–963, 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.07.012, 39130774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Guo X., Zhu Y., Sun Y., and Li X., IL-6 Accelerates Renal Fibrosis After Acute Kidney Injury via DNMT1-Dependent FOXO3a Methylation and Activation of Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway, International Immunopharmacology. (2022) 109, 108746, 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108746, 35569307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Cai Y., Wang Y., Su W., Zhou X., and Lu C., Angelica sinensis Polysaccharide Suppresses the Wnt/β-catenin-Mediated Malignant Biological Behaviors of Breast Cancer Cells via the miR-3187-3p/PCDH10 Axis, Biochemical Pharmacology. (2024) 225, 116295, 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116295, 38762145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wild S. L., Elghajiji A., Grimaldos Rodriguez C., Weston S. D., Burke Z. D., and Tosh D., The Canonical Wnt Pathway as a Key Regulator in Liver Development, Differentiation and Homeostatic Renewal, Genes. (2020) 11, no. 10, 10.3390/genes11101163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Hu S., Liu S., Bian Y., Poddar M., Singh S., Cao C., McGaughey J., Bell A., Blazer L. L., Adams J. J., Sidhu S. S., Angers S., and Monga S. P., Single-Cell Spatial Transcriptomics Reveals a Dynamic Control of Metabolic Zonation and Liver Regeneration by Endothelial Cell Wnt2 and Wnt9b, Cell Reports Medicine. (2022) 3, no. 10, 100754, 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100754, 36220068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Nejak-Bowen K. and Monga S. P., Wnt-β-Catenin in Hepatobiliary Homeostasis, Injury, and Repair, Hepatology. (2023) 78, no. 6, 1907–1921, 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000495, 37246413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Xu C., Xu Z., Zhang Y., Evert M., Calvisi D. F., and Chen X., β-catenin Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Journal of Clinical Investigation. (2022) 132, no. 4, e154515, 10.1172/JCI154515, 35166233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Russell J. O. and Monga S. P., Wnt/β-catenin Signaling in Liver Development, Homeostasis, and Pathobiology, Annual Review of Pathology. (2018) 13, no. 1, 351–378, 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-044010, 2-s2.0-85041729414, 29125798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Park H. B., Kim J. W., and Baek K. H., Regulation of Wnt Signaling Through Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination in Cancers, International Journal of Molecular Sciences. (2020) 21, no. 11, 10.3390/ijms21113904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Zhong W., Zhang Y., Wang W., Shao Z., Xu Z., Zhang G., Gao Z., Zheng Z., Zhang Y., Chen H., and Song G., TRIM26 Deficiency Potentially Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Through NF-κB-Mediated M1-Like Tumor-Associated Macrophage Polarization, British Journal of Cancer. (2025) 133, no. 4, 435–447, 10.1038/s41416-025-03072-8, 40490503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Xu M., Tan J., Liu X., Han L., Ge C., Zhang Y., Luo F., Wang Z., Xue X., Xiong L., Wang X., Zhang Q., Wang X., Tian Q., Zhang S., Meng Q., Dai X., Kuang Q., Li Q., Lou D., Hu L., Liu X., Kuang G., Luo J., Chang C., Wang B., Chai J., Shi S., and Han L., Tripartite Motif Containing 26 Prevents Steatohepatitis Progression by Suppressing C/EBPδ Signalling Activation, Nature Communications. (2023) 14, no. 1, 10.1038/s41467-023-42040-9, 37821436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ma X., Huang T., Chen X., Li Q., Liao M., Fu L., Huang J., Yuan K., Wang Z., and Zeng Y., Molecular Mechanisms in Liver Repair and Regeneration: From Physiology to Therapeutics, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. (2025) 10, no. 1, 10.1038/s41392-024-02104-8, 39920130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Verma A. K., Sharma A., Subramaniyam N., and Gandhi C. R., Augmenter of Liver Regeneration: Mitochondrial Function and Steatohepatitis, Journal of Hepatology. (2022) 77, no. 5, 1410–1421, 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.06.019, 35777586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kumar S., Verma A. K., Rani R., Sharma A., Wang J., Shah S. A., Behari J., Salazar Gonzalez R., Kohli R., and Gandhi C. R., Hepatic Deficiency of Augmenter of Liver Regeneration Predisposes to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis, Hepatology. (2020) 72, no. 5, 1586–1604, 10.1002/hep.31167, 32031683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Lelou E., Corlu A., Nesseler N., Rauch C., Mallédant Y., Seguin P., and Aninat C., The Role of Catecholamines in Pathophysiological Liver Processes, Cells. (2022) 11, no. 6, 10.3390/cells11061021, 35326472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Qin M., Wang D., Fang Y., Zheng Z., Liu X., Wu F., Wang L., Li X., Hui B., Ma S., Tang W., and Pan X., Current Perspectives on B Lymphocytes in the Immunobiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Frontiers in Oncology. (2021) 11, 647854, 10.3389/fonc.2021.647854, 34235074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Bian J., Lin J., Long J., Yang X., Yang X., Lu X., Sang X., and Zhao H., T Lymphocytes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Immune Microenvironment: Insights Into Human Immunology and Immunotherapy, American Journal of Cancer Research. (2020) 10, no. 12, 4585–4606, 33415021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Wu K., Zhang G., Shen C., Zhu L., Yu C., Sartorius K., Ding W., Jiang Y., and Lu Y., Role of T Cells in Liver Metastasis, Cell Death & Disease. (2024) 15, no. 5, 10.1038/s41419-024-06726-2, 38755133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lu Z., Chai X., Pan Y., and Li S., The Causality Between CD8(+)NKT Cells and CD16(-)CD56 on NK Cells With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Mendelian Randomization Study, Infectious Agents and Cancer. (2024) 19, no. 1, 10.1186/s13027-024-00565-8, 38245747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zhang C. Y., Liu S., and Yang M., Regulatory T Cells and Their Associated Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development and Therapy, World Journal of Gastroenterology. (2022) 28, no. 27, 3346–3358, 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3346, 36158267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Shu F., Yu J., Liu Y., Wang F., Gou G., Wen M., Luo C., Lu X., Hu Y., du Q., Xu J., and Xie R., Mast Cells: Key Players in Digestive System Tumors and Their Interactions With Immune Cells, Cell Death Discovery. (2025) 11, no. 1, 10.1038/s41420-024-02258-y, 39814702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section. Figure S1: Quality control metrics across cell clusters. (A) Violin plot of the number of genes detected per cell (nFeature_RNA); (B) violin plot of total UMI counts per cell (nCount_RNA) grouped by cluster; (C) violin plot of the percentage of mitochondrial gene expression relative to all genes per cell; and (D) UMAP visualization of the cell subpopulations.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the [GSE149614] repository, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE149614].
