Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1968 Winter;1(4):283–295. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-283

A synchronization effect and its application to stuttering by a portable apparatus1

N Azrin 1,2, R J Jones 1,2, Barbara Flye 1,2,2
PMCID: PMC1311015  PMID: 16795187

Abstract

The present study attempted to determine how a rhythmic beat affects ongoing behavior. A regular stimulus beat was presented to normal subjects who had been instructed to push a bar from side to side. Other subjects had been instructed to emit a vocal response. The individual vocal and motor responses became synchronized with the individual beats of the rhythm. The time between stimulus beats determined the modal interresponse time. These results indicate a synchronization effect: ongoing behavior tends to become synchronized with an ongoing stimulus rhythm. An attempt was made to apply these findings to the problem of stuttering, which can be considered as a disturbance of the natural rhythm of speech. Stutterers were instructed to synchronize their speech with a simple regular beat presented to them tactually by a portable apparatus. The result was a reduction of 90% or more of the stuttering for each subject during the period of synchronization. This effect endured for extended periods of spontaneous speech as well as for reading aloud and was found to be attributable to the rhythmic nature of the stimulus and not to other factors.

Full text

PDF
283

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayllon T., Azrin N. H. Reinforcer sampling: a technique for increasing the behavior of mental patients. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):13–20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayllon T., Azrin N. H. The measurement and reinforcement of behavior of psychotics. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Nov;8(6):357–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Azrin N. H., Powell J. Behavioral engineering: the reduction of smoking behavior by a conditioning apparatus and procedure. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Fall;1(3):193–200. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Azrin N. H. Some Effects of Noise on Human Behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):183–200. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Azrin N., Rubin H., O'brien F., Ayllon T., Roll D. Behavioral engineering: postural control by a portable operant apparatus. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):99–108. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BARRETT B. H. Reduction in rate of multiple tics by free operant conditioning methods. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1962 Sep;135:187–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BLOODSTEIN O. Conditions under which stuttering is reduced or absent; a review of literature. J Speech Disord. 1949 Dec;14(4):295–302. doi: 10.1044/jshd.1404.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ELLIS D. S., BRIGHOUSE G. Effects of music on respiration- and heart-rate. Am J Psychol. 1952 Jan;65(1):39–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FLANAGAN B., GOLDIAMOND I., AZRIN N. H. Instatement of stuttering in normally fluent individuals through operant procedures. Science. 1959 Oct 16;130(3381):979–980. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3381.979-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Flanagan B., Goldiamond I., Azrin N. Operant Stuttering: the Control of Stuttering Behavior through Response-contingent Consequences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):173–177. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fransella F., Beech H. R. An experimental analysis of the effect of rhythm on the speech of stutterers. Behav Res Ther. 1965 Nov;3(3):195–201. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(65)90005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fransella F. Rhythm as a distractor in the modification of stuttering. Behav Res Ther. 1967 Aug;5(3):253–255. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(67)90042-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goertzel V., May P. R., Salkin J., Schoop T. Body-ego technique: an approach to the schizophrenic patient. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1965 Jul;141(1):53–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MEYER V., MAIR J. M. A NEW TECHNIQUE TO CONTROL STAMMERING: A PRELIMINARY REPORT. Behav Res Ther. 1963 Dec;1:251–254. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(63)90034-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Newman R. I., Jr, Hunt D. L., Rhodes F. Effects of music on employee attitude and productivity in a skateboard factory. J Appl Psychol. 1966 Dec;50(6):493–496. doi: 10.1037/h0024046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Quist R. W., Martin R. R. The effect of response contingent verbal punishment on stuttering. J Speech Hear Res. 1967 Dec;10(4):795–800. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1004.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Siegel G. M., Martin R. R. Experimental modification of disfluency in normal speakers. J Speech Hear Res. 1965 Sep;8(3):235–244. doi: 10.1044/jshr.0803.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Siegel G. M., Martin R. R. Verbal punishment of disfluencies in normal speakers. J Speech Hear Res. 1965 Sep;8(3):245–251. doi: 10.1044/jshr.0803.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith P. C., Curnow R. "Arousal hypothesis" and the effects of music on purchasing behavior. J Appl Psychol. 1966 Jun;50(3):255–256. doi: 10.1037/h0023326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. ZIMNY G. H., WEIDENFELLER E. W. Effects of music upon GSR and heart-rate. Am J Psychol. 1963 Jun;76:311–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. ZIMNY G. H., WEIDENFELLER E. W. Effects of music upon GSR of children. Child Dev. 1962 Dec;33:891–896. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1962.tb05124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES