Abstract
Diabetic foot infections are commonly caused by Gram-positive cocci and Enterobacteriaceae. Isolation of Serratia fonticola is very rare. Here, we report a case of multidrug-resistant Serratia fonticola isolated from a chronic diabetic foot ulcer in a patient with poorly controlled diabetes. The case highlights the importance of microbiological evaluation in non-healing wounds and raises awareness of unusual resistant pathogens in routine clinical practice. A 56-year-old female patient with poorly controlled diabetes developed a non-healing foot ulcer following minor trauma. Culture revealed multidrug-resistant Serratia fonticola. The patient improved with glycemic control, debridement, and culture-directed antibiotics.
Keywords: ampc beta-lactamase, carbapenem resistance, diabetic foot infection, multidrug resistance, serratia fonticola
Introduction
Diabetic foot infection is one of the most serious complications of diabetes mellitus and a common reason for hospital admission. It is estimated that approximately 15-25% of patients with diabetes develop a foot ulcer during their lifetime [1], and a significant proportion of these ulcers become infected. These infections are associated with considerable morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and, in severe cases, an increased risk of limb loss and mortality.
Diabetic foot infections are usually polymicrobial in nature. The most commonly isolated organisms include Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family [2]. The microbial profile often varies depending on factors such as the duration of the ulcer, prior antibiotic use, and local epidemiological patterns.
Several factors contribute to the development of diabetic foot infections, including peripheral neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease, poor glycemic control, and repeated minor trauma. These conditions impair local defense mechanisms and create an environment that favors colonization and infection. Delayed diagnosis or inappropriate antimicrobial therapy can further worsen outcomes and increase the risk of complications such as deep tissue infection or amputation.
Serratia fonticola was initially identified as an environmental organism isolated from water sources [3]. Although traditionally considered non-pathogenic, it is increasingly recognized as an opportunistic pathogen, particularly in individuals with underlying comorbidities. Infections caused by Serratia species have gained attention due to their evolving antimicrobial resistance patterns, including intrinsic resistance characteristics and inducible β-lactamase production [4-6].
However, infections due to Serratia fonticola remain rare, with only sporadic cases reported, and its role in diabetic foot infections remains poorly documented. This case highlights the importance of considering unusual multidrug-resistant organisms in non-healing diabetic foot ulcers and emphasizes the role of timely microbiological evaluation in guiding appropriate and effective therapy.
Case presentation
A 56-year-old female with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus presented with a non-healing ulcer over the right foot following minor trauma 28 days earlier. She had received treatment at multiple centers before referral. Over the preceding 10 days, the wound developed purulent discharge. Clinical examination revealed a necrotic ulcer with surrounding erythema and seropurulent discharge (Figure 1). The ulcer measured approximately 10 × 6 cm, involving the plantar aspect of the right foot, with a necrotic base and surrounding erythema. The depth of the ulcer was approximately 1-2 cm, with no exposed bone. The patient was febrile (temperature: 101.2°F) at presentation but became afebrile following initiation of treatment and remained hemodynamically stable thereafter. Peripheral pulses were palpable on clinical examination, suggesting adequate vascular perfusion. Sensory examination revealed distal sensory loss with reduced vibration and light touch sensation, consistent with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Nerve conduction studies of all four limbs were suggestive of sensorimotor axonal polyneuropathy.
Figure 1. Clinical photograph of the right diabetic foot ulcer.
Pus samples were collected under aseptic precautions. Gram staining demonstrated Gram-negative bacilli (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Gram stain showing Gram-negative bacilli.
Culture showed non-lactose fermenting colonies on MacConkey agar (Figure 3) and non-hemolytic colonies on blood agar (Figure 4).
Figure 3. Growth of Serratia fonticola on MacConkey agar showing non-lactose fermenting colonies.
Figure 4. Growth on blood agar showing non-hemolytic colonies.
A detailed laboratory evaluation was performed at admission, and the results are summarized in Table 1. Hemoglobin was 10.2 g/dL, and the total leukocyte count was elevated at 15,600/mm³ with neutrophilic predominance. Platelet count and red cell indices were within normal limits. Renal and liver function tests were within reference ranges. Despite leukocytosis, blood cultures obtained at admission remained sterile after 48 hours of incubation.
Table 1. Detailed laboratory parameters at admission.
AST = aspartate aminotransferase; SGOT = serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; SGPT = serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase
| Parameter | Patient value | Normal reference range |
| Complete blood count | ||
| Hemoglobin | 10.2 g/dL | 12–15 g/dL |
| Total leukocyte count | 15,600/mm³ | 4,000–11,000/mm³ |
| Neutrophils | 78% | 40–75% |
| Lymphocytes | 18% | 20–40% |
| Monocytes | 3% | 2–8% |
| Eosinophils | 1% | 1–6% |
| Basophils | 0% | 0–1% |
| Platelet count | 2.6 lakh/mm³ | 1.5–4.5 lakh/mm³ |
| Packed cell volume | 34% | 36–46% |
| Mean corpuscular volume | 86 fL | 80–100 fL |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin | 28 pg | 27–32 pg |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration | 33 g/dL | 32–36 g/dL |
| Renal function tests | ||
| Blood urea | 28 mg/dL | 15–40 mg/dL |
| Serum creatinine | 0.9 mg/dL | 0.6–1.2 mg/dL |
| Serum sodium | 138 mEq/L | 135–145 mEq/L |
| Serum potassium | 4.3 mEq/L | 3.5–5.0 mEq/L |
| Serum chloride | 102 mEq/L | 98–106 mEq/L |
| Liver function tests | ||
| Total bilirubin | 0.8 mg/dL | 0.2–1.2 mg/dL |
| Direct bilirubin | 0.2 mg/dL | 0–0.3 mg/dL |
| AST (SGOT) | 24 U/L | 10–40 U/L |
| ALT (SGPT) | 28 U/L | 7–56 U/L |
| Alkaline phosphatase | 92 U/L | 44–147 U/L |
| Total protein | 7.1 g/dL | 6.0–8.3 g/dL |
| Serum albumin | 3.9 g/dL | 3.5–5.0 g/dL |
| Globulin | 3.2 g/dL | 2.0–3.5 g/dL |
| HbA1c | 10.2% | <5.7% |
The organism was identified as Serratia fonticola using a VITEK 2 compact automated identification system. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by using minimum inhibitory concentration-based methods, and results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing results are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern.
MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration
| Antibiotic | MIC | Interpretation |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 64 | Resistant |
| Ceftazidime | 8 | Intermediate |
| Cefoperazone-sulbactam | <8 | Sensitive |
| Cefepime | ≥32 | Resistant |
| Aztreonam | ≥64 | Resistant |
| Imipenem | ≥16 | Resistant |
| Meropenem | ≥16 | Resistant |
| Amikacin | 32 | Intermediate |
| Gentamicin | >16 | Resistant |
| Ciprofloxacin | >4 | Resistant |
| Levofloxacin | >8 | Resistant |
| Minocycline | 16 | Resistant |
| Tigecycline | >8 | Resistant |
| Colistin | >16 | Resistant |
The patient underwent surgical debridement of the necrotic tissue. Based on susceptibility results, she was treated with intravenous cefoperazone sulbactam for 14 days along with strict glycemic control using insulin therapy. The wound gradually improved with a reduction in discharge and healthy granulation tissue formation. She was discharged in stable condition and remained clinically stable at the two-week follow-up with progressive wound healing.
Discussion
Serratia fonticola is a Gram-negative bacillus that was first described as an environmental organism isolated from water sources [3]. Although it was historically considered non-pathogenic, it is now increasingly recognized as a potential opportunistic pathogen, particularly in vulnerable individuals such as those with chronic illnesses or impaired immunity. Its isolation in a diabetic foot infection is uncommon and clinically significant, especially in the setting of rising antimicrobial resistance.
A notable feature of Serratia fonticola is its intrinsic and acquired resistance potential. The organism carries an inducible chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamase, which can reduce susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and aztreonam [4]. Exposure to beta-lactam antibiotics may enhance enzyme expression, thereby compromising therapeutic effectiveness. Furthermore, environmental organisms within the Serratia genus have the capacity to acquire additional resistance determinants through horizontal gene transfer, contributing to their evolving resistance profiles [5,6]. The organism showed a multidrug-resistant profile, with resistance to multiple antibiotic classes, including beta-lactams, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and polymyxins.
Resistance to carbapenems in Serratia species is typically multifactorial and may involve enzymatic degradation, altered membrane permeability, and efflux mechanisms [5,6]. The high minimum inhibitory concentrations observed in our isolate likely reflect the combined action of these mechanisms. The resistance to colistin observed in this case may be explained by intrinsic structural properties of the bacterial outer membrane, which reduce susceptibility to polymyxins.
In diabetic foot ulcers, repeated antibiotic exposure, compromised vascular supply, and persistent hyperglycemia create a favorable environment for the selection of resistant organisms. Although Serratia fonticola remains a rare cause of diabetic foot infection, this case highlights the importance of obtaining culture confirmation and tailoring antimicrobial therapy based on susceptibility results in chronic or non-healing wounds. In this case, the patient remained clinically stable at the two-week follow-up with progressive wound healing. This shows the importance of routine microbiological evaluation in chronic or non-healing diabetic foot ulcers, as it enables the identification of unusual multidrug-resistant pathogens and facilitates targeted antimicrobial therapy for better outcomes.
Similar multidrug-resistant cases have been reported in previously described Serratia infections, particularly in opportunistic settings, supporting the emerging clinical significance of this organism. The observed resistance to beta-lactams and cephalosporins may be attributed to AmpC beta-lactamase production, while carbapenem resistance may involve additional mechanisms such as reduced membrane permeability and efflux activity. Molecular characterization of resistance genes was not performed, which is a limitation of this report. This case also highlights the importance of infection control practices and surveillance for emerging multidrug-resistant organisms in the healthcare setting.
This case highlights the importance of structured antimicrobial stewardship programs, which have been shown to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use while preserving clinical outcomes, supporting data-driven prescribing practices [7].
Conclusions
Serratia fonticola may be a multidrug-resistant opportunistic pathogen in cases of diabetic foot infection. The expression of AmpC beta-lactamase and lower susceptibility to carbapenem underline the complexity of the treatment of this organism. Early diagnosis, treatment based on culture, and judicious use of antimicrobials are critical to achieve the best outcome in patients and reduce the development of additional resistance. Serratia fonticola is an uncommon but possible opportunistic pathogen in diabetic foot infections. Microbiological diagnosis and specific antimicrobial treatment during the treatment of atypical and resistant infections are a priority. As a single case report, the findings may have limited generalizability but provide important clinical insights into emerging multidrug-resistant pathogens.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Ashish Jangid, Shalini Singh, Prashant Pandey, Dilip Chaurasiya, Shobhit Agarwal
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Ashish Jangid, Shalini Singh, Prashant Pandey, Dilip Chaurasiya, Shobhit Agarwal
Drafting of the manuscript: Ashish Jangid, Shalini Singh, Prashant Pandey, Dilip Chaurasiya, Shobhit Agarwal
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Ashish Jangid, Shalini Singh, Prashant Pandey, Dilip Chaurasiya, Shobhit Agarwal
Supervision: Ashish Jangid, Shalini Singh, Prashant Pandey, Dilip Chaurasiya, Shobhit Agarwal
References
- 1.Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJ, Bus SA. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2367–2375. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1615439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update) Lipsky BA, Senneville É, Abbas ZG, et al. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36 Suppl 1:0. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Serratia fonticola, a new species from water. Gavini F, Ferragut C, Izard D, Trinel PA, Leclerc H, Lefebvre B, Mossel DAA. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1979;29:92–101. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Natural antimicrobial susceptibilities of strains of 'unusual' Serratia species: S. ficaria, S. fonticola, S. odorifera, S. plymuthica and S. rubidaea. Stock I, Burak S, Sherwood KJ, Gruger T, Wiedemann B. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:865–885. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Serratia infections: from military experiments to current practice. Mahlen SD. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:755–791. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00017-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Serratia infections in a general hospital: characteristics and outcomes. Samonis G, Vouloumanou EK, Christofaki M, et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:653–660. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1135-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Improving antimicrobial stewardship program using the lean Six Sigma methodology: a descriptive study from Mediclinic Welcare Hospital in Dubai, the UAE. Sallam M, Snygg J. Healthcare (Basel) 2023;11:3048. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11233048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




