Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Mar 23;65(18):e6271309. doi: 10.1002/anie.6271309

Matrimid‐Derived Asymmetric Carbon Molecular Sieve Hollow Fibers With Engineered Ultramicropores for Precise Helium Separation

Zhongyun Liu 1,2, Yuhe Cao 1,3, Ryan P Lively 1, William J Koros 1,
PMCID: PMC13110757  PMID: 41873019

ABSTRACT

Helium/methane (He/CH4) separation is of strategic importance for energy and industrial applications, yet it remains technically challenging due to the need to simultaneously achieve ultrahigh selectivity and helium productivity. In this work, we report ultraselective Matrimid‐derived asymmetric carbon molecular sieve (CMS) hollow fibers in which ultramicropore and fiber geometry are deliberately co‐engineered to enable precise He/CH4 separation with high He productivity at the module level. We showed that pyrolysis temperature tuning tightens ångström‐scale ultramicropores and enhances He/CH4 discrimination; while a targeted post‐pyrolysis hyperaging enables selective refining of the ultramicropores, thereby offering high He permeance with exceptional He/CH4 selectivity. For a 5/95 He/CH4 mixed gas feed, the hyperaged CMS‐700 hollow fibers achieve permeate helium purities of up to 98.6% with He/CH4 selectivities exceeding 1300 and a stable He permeance of approximately 26 GPU. Beyond this material achievement, fiber geometry optimization through reduction of the outer diameter was achieved to increase the packable membrane area without compromising mechanical integrity or intrinsic separation performance, leading to enhanced module‐level He productivity. This integrated co‐engineering strategy provides an energy‐efficient and industrially viable platform for He recovery and is readily extendable to other challenging small/large gas‐pair separations.

Keywords: carbon molecular sieve hollow fiber, He/CH4 separation, hyperaging, ultramicropore tuning


Matrimid‐derived asymmetric carbon molecular sieve (CMS) hollow fibers enable ultraselective helium/methane (He/CH4) separation. Post‐pyrolysis hyperaging selectively tightens larger ultramicropores, enhancing He/CH4 discrimination while maintaining high He permeance. Reducing CMS fiber outer diameter increases packable area and module throughput, coupling high selectivity with high module‐level He productivity.

graphic file with name ANIE-65-e6271309-g003.jpg


Efficient separation of helium (He) from methane (CH4) is of critical strategic and economic importance. Helium is a critical yet non‐renewable resource that plays essential roles across diverse sectors [1], including scientific research, aerospace, medical technology, and high‐tech manufacturing. Currently, the primary source of helium is natural gas, from which it is recovered through energy‐intensive cryogenic distillation with high carbon emissions [2]. These challenges have driven increasing interest in energy‐efficient membrane‐based separation technologies for such separations [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Considering the low helium content in natural gas (< 0.1–9.8 mol%) [8, 9, 10] and the high‐purity requirements for its end‐use applications, developing ultraselective membranes capable of precise He/CH4 discrimination is crucial for sustainable helium recovery and long‐term supply security.

Carbon molecular sieve (CMS) membranes combine outstanding separation performance with scalable processability, making them a promising platform for advanced gas separations [11, 12]. Specifically, the tunable ångström‐scale ultramicropores in CMS enable exceptional molecular discrimination based on subtle differences in gas molecule size and shape. Moreover, CMS membranes can be fabricated as mechanically robust hollow fibers, enabling the construction of high surface‐to‐volume and compact modular devices suitable for large‐scale industrial applications [13, 14]. In previous work, Matrimid‐derived CMS hollow fibers have been reported for CO2/CH4 [15, 16, 17], N2/CH4 [18], and light hydrocarbon separations [19, 20]; however, their application to helium purification has not been explored. In this work, we demonstrate that ultraselective helium separation from He/CH4 mixtures can be achieved using Matrimid‐derived CMS hollow fibers with engineered ultramicropores tailored for He/CH4 discrimination. Controlled pyrolysis of vinyltrimethoxysilane (VTMS)‐treated precursors [13, 14] followed by targeted hyperaging selectively tightens larger ultramicropores to enable an uncommon combination of ultrahigh He/CH4 selectivity and high He permeance. Furthermore, reducing fiber outer diameter serves as a module‐level relevant feature to enhance helium productivity without compromising intrinsic separation performance. Together, this work establishes commercially available Matrimid‐derived CMS hollow fibers as a scalable and previously unexplored platform for helium recovery, extending CMS technology beyond prior state‐of‐the‐art separations.

To prepare high‐performance CMS hollow fibers, spinning defect‐free, thin‐skinned hollow fiber precursors is important. In our work, Matrimid hollow fiber precursors were prepared via a dry‐jet wet‐quench spinning process [21, 22], and detailed spinning conditions (Table S1) are provided in the Supporting Information. The resulting Matrimid fibers exhibited an asymmetric morphology (Figures 1a and S1) comprising a thin selective skin layer and a porous substructure. The O2/N2 selectivity of the Matrimid precursors with a take‐up rate of 50 m min−1 was measured to be 7.2, slightly higher than that of Matrimid dense films (6.7), confirming the prepared fiber precursors are defect‐free (Table S2). Prior to pyrolysis, a sol–gel VTMS treatment was applied to prevent excessive collapse of the porous substructure during carbonization [17, 23]. As shown in Figure 1b–d, all the resulting CMS hollow fibers retained their asymmetric morphology, which is preferred for minimizing mass‐transfer resistance in CMS fiber walls to enable high gas permeance. In contrast, in the absence of VTMS treatment, the porous substructure collapsed completely, yielding a fully densified CMS fiber wall (Figure S2).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

SEM images of Matrimid hollow fiber precursor (a) and CMS fibers pyrolyzed under different temperatures (b–d). Without VTMS, the morphology in (b–d) looks like the densified cases at the shell side.

Beyond optimizing the macroscopic morphology of CMS hollow fibers, the ultramicropore structure was also tuned by optimizing the pyrolysis temperature for He/CH4 separation. Pure gas permeation measurements of the prepared CMS hollow fibers revealed a clear decrease in permeance with increasing gas kinetic diameter, confirming the molecular sieving nature of the CMS membranes (Figure 2a). With increasing pyrolysis temperature from 700 to 900°C, the overall gas permeance decreased while the larger CH4 molecules showed a more pronounced reduction, indicating the tightening of ultramicropores at higher temperatures that restrict CH4 diffusion and thereby increase the He/CH4 selectivity (Figure 2a,b). In contrast to He/CH4 separation, elevating the pyrolysis temperature over this range showed little effect on He/N2 selectivity (Figure 2c), showing that the tightened ultramicropores still allow the permeation of slimmer N2 molecules. The He/CH4 separation performance of the CMS fibers was evaluated using a 5/95 He/CH4 mixture feed at 35°C and a total feed pressure of 100 psia.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(a) Pure‐gas permeance of CMS fibers pyrolyzed at different temperatures; (b) ideal He/CH4 selectivity; (c) ideal He/N2 selectivity. (d) He/CH4 selectivity under a 5/95 He/CH4 mixed‐gas feed (35°C, 100 psia). (e) Long‐term He/CH4 separation performance of CMS‐900 under a 5/95 He/CH4 feed (35°C, 100 psia). (f) He/CH4 separation performance of CMS‐900 under different mixed gas feed pressures.

Figure 2d shows a strong tradeoff between He/CH4 selectivity and permeance for the CMS‐900 versus CMS‐800 case. In any case, higher He/CH4 selectivity enabled higher helium purity in the permeate stream, which increased from 92.96% to 99.10% as the pyrolysis temperature increased from 700 to 900°C. Long‐term measurements under the 5/95 He/CH4 mixed gas feed (Figure 2e) showed that the CMS‐900 fibers stabilize after 48 h and maintained stable performance over 5 days, with a stable He permeance of 3.7 GPU and a He/CH4 selectivity exceeding 2000. The effect of feed pressure was also examined, and Figure 2f shows that both He permeance and He/CH4 selectivity decreased with increasing pressure, which can be attributed to competitive sorption of CH4 over He. Nevertheless, a permeate helium purity of 98.4% was still achieved at 400 psia. These results demonstrate that optimization of the pyrolysis temperature is an effective strategy to tighten ultramicropores in CMS membranes for improving He/CH4 selectivity.

This fact notwithstanding, thermally induced ultramicropore tightening at high pyrolysis temperatures is unavoidably accompanied by a decrease in He permeance. To further enhance He/CH4 selectivity while maintaining high He permeance, we therefore sought to primarily tighten the larger ultramicropores at the upper end of the pore‐size distribution (Figure 3a). To this end, a post‐pyrolysis hyperaging treatment was applied to CMS fibers. Our previous work showed that freshly prepared CMS membranes undergo self‐retarding physical aging associated with tightening of these larger ultramicropores [24, 25], thereby allowing this process to be tuned by hyperaging [26]. We illustrate this pore‐tuning approach to selectively tailor the larger ultramicropores for He/CH4 separation of CMS‐700 fibers by hyperaging in air at different temperatures and durations. As shown in Figure 3b, compared with the pristine CMS‐700 fibers, the hyperaged CMS‐700 fibers exhibited markedly reduced permeance for CO2, N2, and CH4, while the permeance for the smaller He and H2 molecules remained nearly unchanged. Consistent with this effect, Figure 3c shows that hyperaging significantly enhanced the He/CH4 selectivity with little loss in He permeance. Notably, compared with standard CMS‐900 fibers and other advanced membranes shown in Figure S3 and Table S3, the CMS‐700 fibers hyperaged at 200°C for 1 h achieved more than an order‐of‐magnitude higher pure He permeance (32.6 GPU), with only a slightly lower ideal He/CH4 selectivity (2745.6 vs. 3674.4 for CMS‐900 in Figure 3c). A similar tendency was observed for H2/CH4 separation (Figure S4). Moreover, Figures 3d and S5 indicate that hyperaging also significantly improved He/N2 and H2/N2 separations, and the hyperaged CMS‐700 fibers at 200°C for 1 h showed both substantially higher He permeance and higher He/N2 selectivity (568.5) than the CMS‐900 fibers. By contrast, Figure S6 shows that hyperaging did not benefit CO2/CH4 or N2/CH4 separations, where the hyperaging treatment led to a noticeable decrease in gas permeance while the CO2/CH4 and N2/CH4 selectivities were not improved. These results suggest that hyperaging preferentially improves separations involving small penetrants (He, H2) over larger species (CO2, N2, CH4), which is consistent with our hypothesis that hyperaging can selectively tighten the upper end of the ultramicropore distribution [24]. Furthermore, cross‐sectional SEM images of CMS fiber walls in Figure S7 showed no significant differences in overall morphology or skin‐layer thickness before and after hyperaging treatment, indicating that hyperaging primarily affects subtle ultramicropore structure within the dense skin layer rather than inducing visible morphological changes.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(a) Schematic of ultramicropore tuning by pyrolysis temperature and hyperaging; pure‐gas permeance (b), ideal He/CH4 (c) and ideal He/N2 (d) selectivity of hyperaged CMS‐700 fibers; (e) comparison of mixed He/CH4 separation performance of CMS fibers (5/95 He/CH4, 35°C, 100 psia) and (f) Long‐term mixed He/CH4 separation performance of hyperaged CMS‐700 fibers (200°C for 1 h).

We also evaluated the separation performance of the hyperaged CMS‐700 fibers (200°C, 1 h) using a 5/95 He/CH4 feed at 35°C and 100 psia. As shown in Figure 3e,f, the hyperaged fibers exhibited a clear increase in He/CH4 selectivity (1338.1) while retaining high He permeance (about 26 GPU) well beyond the simple 900°C pyrolysis sample. These results confirm that post‐pyrolysis hyperaging provides a more favorable trade‐off between He/CH4 selectivity and He permeance than simply increasing the pyrolysis temperature.

Beyond intrinsic material tuning, the practical He productivity of a hollow‐fiber module depends strongly on the amount of membrane area that can be packed into the module shell. When the permeance remains unchanged, the module‐averaged productivity increases with higher packing density. Since the packable membrane area per unit module volume scales inversely with fiber outer diameter (OD) (∝ 1/OD) [27, 28], reducing the CMS fiber OD is an efficient means to increase the membrane area per unit volume (Figure 4a) and thereby maximize He throughput. Thus, besides selectively tightening ultramicropores through hyperaging, engineering CMS hollow fibers with reduced OD represents a complementary and equally critical design lever for achieving high‐performance He/CH4 separation at the module level [29].

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

(a) Schematic of fiber packing density as function of OD of CMS fibers; (b) photo of Matrimid hollow fiber precursors spun with take up rate of 50 and 100 m min 1; pure‐gas permeance (c) and ideal He/CH4 (d) and ideal He/N2 (d) selectivity of CMS fibers with reduced OD; Long‐term mixed He/CH4 separation performance of CMS‐900‐ROD (e) and hyperaged CMS‐700‐ROD fibers (f).

To explore this option, Matrimid hollow fibers with reduced OD were produced by increasing the take‐up rate while holding all other spinning parameters constant. As shown in Figure 4b and Table S2, defect‐free fibers were successfully spun at a take‐up rate as high as 100 m min 1. SEM images (Figure S8) show that the precursor OD decreased from 323 µm to 121 µm as the take‐up rate increased from 30 to 100 m min 1; correspondingly, the OD of the resulting CMS‐900 fibers derived from the 100 m min 1 precursors decreased to 85 µm. Bend tests as shown in Figure S9 indicate that the CMS‐900 fibers with reduced OD (i.e., ROD) remain highly flexible, demonstrating mechanical robustness for module fabrication and practical use. Pure gas permeance was evaluated for CMS fibers with reduced OD (take‐up rate 100 m min 1), including CMS‐900‐ROD and hyperaged CMS‐700‐ROD, and benchmarked them against CMS fibers prepared from precursors spun at 50 m·min 1. As shown in Figure 4c,d, reducing OD did not significantly affect gas permeance or He/CH4 selectivity. Under a 5/95 He/CH4 mixed‐gas feed, both CMS‐900‐ROD and hyperaged CMS‐700‐ROD exhibited stable separation performance (Figure 4e,f). Although CMS‐900‐ROD shows reduced He permeance under mixed‐gas conditions compared with pure gas due to He/CH4 competition, the mixed‐gas selectivity remains high and stable. Specifically, CMS‐900‐ROD (OD = 85 µm) showed a stable He permeance of 2.1 GPU and He/CH4 selectivity of 2216, yielding permeate helium purity above 99%, comparable to that of CMS‐ 900 fibers with OD of 187 µm (He permeance of 3.7 GPU with He/CH4 selectivity of about 2000, as shown in Figure 2e). In comparison, CMS‐700‐ROD (OD < 100 µm) exhibited a higher and stable He permeance (∼16.2 GPU) while maintaining mixed gas He/CH4 selectivity above 1000. Notably, the hyperaged CMS‐700‐ROD membranes maintained stable He permeance and He/CH4 selectivity for over 120 h (Figure 4f), demonstrating excellent operational stability for practical separation processes. Collectively, these results show that OD reduction increases packable area without significantly compromising fiber mechanics or intrinsic membrane selectivity, thereby enabling higher module‐level He productivity with maintained high He/CH4 selectivity. Although reducing fiber diameter requires careful management of bore‐side pressure drop and wall porosity, our results demonstrate that this can be balanced in practice.

In conclusion, we demonstrate a scalable strategy for ultraselective He/CH4 separation based on Matrimid‐derived asymmetric CMS hollow fibers, where co‐engineering of ultramicropores and fiber geometry enables high He/CH4 selectivity with elevated module‐level He productivity. This combination of mechanically robust hollow‐fiber form, precise ultramicropore engineering, and module‐focused design enables a practical, reproducible platform for industrial helium recovery and can be readily adapted to other challenging small/large gas‐pair separations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting File: anie71903‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Roberto C. Goizueta Chair fund, the U.S. Department of Energy Grant DE‐FG02‐04ER15510, and the Specialty Separations Center at Georgia Institute of Technology for assistance in equipment resource funds.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Nuttall W. J., Clarke R. H., and Glowacki B. A., “Stop Squandering Helium,” Nature 485 (2012): 573–575, 10.1038/485573a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sunarso J., Hashim S. S., Lin Y., and Liu S., “Membranes for Helium Recovery: An Overview on the Context, Materials and Future Directions,” Separation and Purification Technology 176 (2017): 335–383, 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.12.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dai Z., Deng J., He X., et al., “Helium Separation Using Membrane Technology: Recent Advances And Perspectives,” Separation and Purification Technology 274 (2021): 119044, 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Park H. B., Kamcev J., Robeson L. M., Elimelech M., and Freeman B. D., “Maximizing the Right Stuff: The Trade‐off Between Membrane Permeability and Selectivity,” Science 356 (2017): eaab0530, 10.1126/science.aab0530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Li X., Chen C., Sun L., et al., “Superior He/CH4 Separation Properties of Crosslinked Thermally Rearranged Membranes Obtained by Direct Fluorination Strategy,” Journal of Membrane Science 731 (2025): 124230, 10.1016/j.memsci.2025.124230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Liu L., Li Q., Sun L., et al., “Ultrahigh He Enrichment Property of Carbon Molecular Sieve Membranes by Direct Fluorination,” Journal of Membrane Science 717 (2025): 123647, 10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jin D., Xiao G., Lu Z., et al., “Industrial Advances in Helium Recovery and Purification Technologies: A Review,” Separation and Purification Technology 380 (2026): 135136, 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.135136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Scholes C. A., Gosh U. K., and Ho M. T., “The Economics of Helium Separation and Purification by Gas Separation Membranes,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 56 (2017): 5014–5020, 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Alders M., Winterhalder D., and Wessling M., “Helium Recovery Using Membrane Processes,” Separation and Purification Technology 189 (2017): 433–440, 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ward D. E. and Pierce A. P., “Helium in the United States Mineral Resources,” U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 820 (1973): 289. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Liu Z., Qiu W., Quan W., and Koros W. J., “Advanced Carbon Molecular Sieve Membranes Derived From Molecularly Engineered Cross‐Linkable Copolyimide for Gas Separations,” Nature Materials 22 (2023): 109–116, 10.1038/s41563-022-01426-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Liu Z., Cao Y., and Koros W. J., “Polyimide‐Derived Carbon Molecule Sieve Membranes for Gas Separations,” Nature Chemical Engineering 1 (2024): 119–123, 10.1038/s44286-023-00021-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lei L., Pan F., Lindbråthen A., et al., “Carbon Hollow Fiber Membranes For A Molecular Sieve With Precise‐Cutoff Ultramicropores For Superior Hydrogen Separation,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 268, 10.1038/s41467-020-20628-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cao Y., Liu Z., and Koros W. J., “Above‐T g Annealing Benefits in Nanoparticle‐Stabilized Carbon Molecular Sieve Membrane Pyrolysis for Improved Gas Separation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): e202317864, 10.1002/anie.202317864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zhang C. and Koros W. J., “Ultraselective Carbon Molecular Sieve Membranes With Tailored Synergistic Sorption Selective Properties,” Advanced Materials 29 (2017): 1701631, 10.1002/adma.201701631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vu D. Q., Koros W. J., and Miller S. J., “High Pressure CO2/CH4 Separation Using Carbon Molecular Sieve Hollow Fiber Membranes,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 41 (2002): 367–380, 10.1021/ie010119w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhang C., Kumar R., and Koros W. J., “Ultra‐Thin Skin Carbon Hollow Fiber Membranes for Sustainable Molecular Separations,” AIChE Journal 65 (2019): e16611, 10.1002/aic.16611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ning X. and Koros W. J., “Carbon Molecular Sieve Membranes Derived From Matrimid® Polyimide for Nitrogen/Methane Separation,” Carbon 66 (2014): 511–522, 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Xu L., Rungta M., and Koros W. J., “Matrimid® Derived Carbon Molecular Sieve Hollow Fiber Membranes for Ethylene/Ethane Separation,” Journal of Membrane Science 380 (2011): 138–147, 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kim S.‐J., Kim J. F., Cho Y. H., Nam S.‐E., Park H., and Park Y.‐I., “Aging‐Resistant Carbon Molecular Sieve Membrane Derived From Pre‐Crosslinked Matrimid® for Propylene/Propane Separation,” Journal of Membrane Science 636 (2021): 119555, 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119555. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Clausi D. T. and Koros W. J., “Formation of Defect‐Free Polyimide Hollow Fiber Membranes for Gas Separations,” Journal of Membrane Science 167 (2000): 79–89, 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00276-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Dong G., Li H., and Chen V., “Factors Affect Defect‐Free Matrimid® Hollow Fiber Gas Separation Performance in Natural Gas Purification,” Journal of Membrane Science 353 (2010): 17–27, 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bhuwania N., Labreche Y., Achoundong C. S., et al., “Engineering Substructure Morphology Of Asymmetric Carbon Molecular Sieve Hollow Fiber Membranes,” Carbon 76 (2014): 417–434, 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Liu Z., Qiu W., and Koros W. J., “New Insights Into Physical Aging‐Induced Structure Evolution in Carbon Molecular Sieve Membranes,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61 (2022): e202210831, 10.1002/anie.202210831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hays S. S., Sanyal O., León N. E., Arab P., and Koros W. J., “Envisioned Role of Slit Bypass Pores In Physical Aging Of Carbon Molecular Sieve Membranes,” Carbon 157 (2020): 385–394, 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Qiu W., Vaughn J., Liu G., et al., “Hyperaging Tuning of a Carbon Molecular‐Sieve Hollow Fiber Membrane With Extraordinary Gas‐Separation Performance and Stability,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58 (2019): 11700–11703, 10.1002/anie.201904913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li D., Wang R., and Chung T.‐S., “Fabrication of Lab‐Scale Hollow Fiber Membrane Modules With High Packing Density,” Separation and Purification Technology 40 (2004): 15–30, 10.1016/j.seppur.2003.12.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Baker R. W., Membrane Technology and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2023), 10.1002/9781119686026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. McKelvey S. A., Clausi D. T., and Koros W. J., “A Guide to Establishing Hollow Fiber Macroscopic Properties for Membrane Applications,” Journal of Membrane Science 124 (1997): 223–232, 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00249-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File: anie71903‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES