Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1970 Spring;3(1):13–28. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-13

The control of “classroom attention”: a group contingency for complex behavior1

Robert G Packard 1,2
PMCID: PMC1311086  PMID: 16795234

Abstract

Cumulative time measures of classroom attention, as delineated by the teacher, were taken of four elementary classes (kindergarten, third, fifth, and sixth grades) and of 16 randomly chosen students in these same classes. Each class of students was viewed as an individual responding organism. Base rates showed considerable variability. Explicit instructions alone concerning student attention produced temporary increase for some students and for some grades. Adding group contingencies (i.e., contingencies dependent on the attention of every student in the class) and token-mediated reinforcement to class achievement of a gradually increasing attention criterion raised group measures to a consistent 70 to 85% level of time attending to task as instructed, and raised individual student measures to a stable 90 to 100% level. Reversals and other data indicate that the elementary teacher can, by herself and with little effort, maximize what she considers the “paying-attention behavior” of all her students by her less-than-precise measure and consequation of the attention of the class as a whole.

Full text

PDF
13

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRACKBILL Y., JACK D. Discrimination learning in children as a function of reinforcement value. Child Dev. 1958 Jun;29(2):185–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bushell D., Wrobel P. A., Michaelis M. L. Applying "group" contingencies to the classroom study behavior of preschool children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):55–61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hall R. V., Lund D., Jackson D. Effects of teacher attention on study behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):1–12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Madsen C. H., Becker W. C., Thomas D. R. Rules, praise, and ignoring: elements of elementary classroom control. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):139–150. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Martin G. L., Powers R. B. Attention span: an operant conditioning analysis. Except Child. 1967 Apr;33(8):565–570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. O'Leary K. D., Becker W. C. Behavior modification of an adjustment class: a token reinforcement program. Except Child. 1967 May;33(9):637–642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schmidt G. W., Ulrich R. E. Effects of group contingent events upon classroom noise. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Fall;2(3):171–179. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wahler R. G. Child-child interactions in free field settings: some experimental analyses. J Exp Child Psychol. 1967 Jun;5(2):278–293. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(67)90013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Walker H. M., Buckley N. K. The use of positive reinforcement in conditioning attending behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Fall;1(3):245–250. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zimmerman E. H., Zimmerman J., Russell C. D. Differential effects of token reinforcement on instruction-following behavior in retarded students instructed as a group. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):101–112. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES