Abstract
A daily report-card system, involving home privileges administered by parents, was developed for use with “problem” junior-high students. In Experiment I, when home privileges and parent praise were contingent on improved school conduct, classwork, daily grades, and teacher satisfaction, the school performance of three students improved considerably. In Experiment II, a similar report-card system was employed with two additional students, except only parent praise was contingent on improved school performance. Under these conditions, one of the students did not bring the report card home, and class performance did not improve until contingent home privileges were added. The school performance of the second student improved with the card and praise alone. However, there appeared to be a slow decline of classwork performance over time. For Experiment III, an instructional manual, describing the report-card program, was written for school guidance counsellors. Two guidance counsellors read the program, used it with one student each, and found that the school performance of both students improved. These results suggest that the daily report-card program with home consequences administered by parents can improve the school performance of, and teacher satisfaction about, students having considerable difficulty in school.
Keywords: academic behavior, classroom behavior, disruptive behavior, point economy, home-based reinforcement, teacher satisfaction, counsellors, parents, adolescents
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baer D. M., Wolf M. M., Risley T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bailey J. S., Wolf M. M., Phillips E. L. Home-based reinforcement and the modification of pre-delinquents' classroom behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Fall;3(3):223–233. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barrish H. H., Saunders M., Wolf M. M. Good behavior game: effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):119–124. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Broden M., Hall R. V., Dunlap A., Clark R. Effects of teacher attention and a token reinforcement system in a junior high school special education class. Except Child. 1970 Jan;36(5):341–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris V. W., Sherman J. A. Effects of peer tutoring and consequences on the math performance of elementary classroom students. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Winter;6(4):587–597. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maloney K. B., Hopkins B. L. The modification of sentence structure and its relationship to subjective judgements of creativity in writing. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Fall;6(3):425–433. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McAllister L. W., Stachowiak J. G., Baer D. M., Conderman L. The application of operant conditioning techniques in a secondary school classroom. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Winter;2(4):277–285. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quilitch H. R. A comparison of three staff-management procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Spring;8(1):59–66. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]