Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are emerging contaminants whose bioremediation becomes challenging under multiple environmental stressors. This study evaluates the resilience and NSAID tolerance of Bacillus safensis HS4–2 and Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1. The two strains were isolated from saline-sodium sediment. They were tested independently for tolerance to salinity (0 – 3.4µ M), pH (5–11), and the NSAIDs diclofenac, ibuprofen, and ketoprofen (10, 100, and 1000 µM). Genetic identification was performed using the 16S rRNA gene, followed by whole-genome sequencing with the Illumina and Nanopore platforms, and annotation through RAST. The Strain HS4–2 tolerated 0 – 2.5µ M NaCl, pH 5–11, 10 µM diclofenac, 1000 µM ibuprofen, and 100 µM ketoprofen. The strain TXO1–1SG1 tolerated 0 – 2.5 µM NaCl, pH 5–11, 10 µM diclofenac, 100 µM ibuprofen, and 1000 µM ketoprofen. Both genetic and genomic analyses confirm the species assignments (Bacillus safensis HS4–2, Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1). Genome annotation revealed genes associated with stress response, and aromatic compound metabolism, suggesting their potential role in NSAID transformation, although no analytical validation of degradation was performed. All sequences are available in GenBank. The dataset provides a resource for comparative and functional genomic studies of extremotolerant Bacillus strains in environments with multiple stress conditions.
Keywords: Bacillus, Genome, Multiple stress, Resilience, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, Tolerance
Specifications Table
| Subject | Biology |
| Specific subject area | Resilience genes and biotechnological potential of Bacillus species |
| Type of data | Experimental data: Fig. 1, Fig. 2 (tolerance assays for NaCl, pH, and NSAIDs) Analytical data: Table 1, Fig. 3, and Fig. 4 (genome assembly, annotation, and functional gene analyses) |
| Data collection | Strains HS4–2 and TXO1–1SG1 were isolated from saline-sodium sediment from Lake Texcoco in Mexico. High-molecular-weight DNA was extracted from both strains using the MasterPure Complete DNA & RNA Purification Kit (LGC Biosearch Technologies, MV89010) according to the manufacturer's specifications. The extracted DNA was subsequently sent to Plasmidsaurus (CA, USA) for whole-genome sequencing using a hybrid Illumina-Nanopore approach. Species identification was performed using RapdTool v2.1.0, followed by genome annotation with the RAST server. Finally, genes associated with stress response and the metabolism of aromatic compounds were screened within the annotated genomes. |
| Data source location | Country: México City: Texcoco Location: Texcoco’s Lake (19°30′N 98°59′O) |
| Data accessibility | Repository name: National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBankData identification number:HS4–2:
Genome sequences:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JBLQUJ000000000.1/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_JBLGEH000000000.1 |
| Related research article | None |
1. Value of the Data
-
•
Bacillus safensis HS4–2 and Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1 have a remarkable resilience to multiple stress factors. This stability in the face of environmental stress factors positions these bacteria as strong candidates for biotechnological applications, instilling confidence in their potential.
-
•
The Bacillus species show promise for tolerate diclofenac, ibuprofen, and ketoprofen, which are common environmental contaminants. Furthermore, according to their genomic information, their potential is likely not limited to these compounds but could also tolerate various contaminants, whether emerging or persistent such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).
-
•
The data reported in this study can serve as background information for further investigations that delve deeper into genomic details to harness the biotechnological potential of Bacillus safensis HS4–2 and Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1.
2. Background
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in human and veterinary medicine. Their presence in the environment is concerning because they are designed to exert biological effects at low doses, posing a potential risk to non-target organisms exposed to them [1]. In Mexico, although NSAIDs such as diclofenac, ibuprofen, and ketoprofen are available over the counter, there is no specific legislation regulating their use or environmental control. Several reports document their presence in water bodies, soil, and living organisms; internationally, they are classified as priority pollutants in the European Union [2].
Given this situation, microorganisms have emerged as sustainable tools for eliminating pharmaceutical contaminants. Species such as Bacillus mojavensis and B. paralicheniformis have demonstrated diclofenac-degrading activity [3,4], while B. siamensis, B. thuringiensis, and B. freudenreichii have been reported as ibuprofen degraders [[5], [6], [7]]. Likewise, B. thuringiensis and B. paralicheniformis show the capacity to degrade naproxen and ketoprofen, respectively [4,8].
This study evaluates the tolerance of Bacillus strains against diclofenac, ibuprofen, and ketoprofen through in vitro assays and genomic analysis. The findings highlight the strains' resilience, evidenced by their growth under high salinity, pH variation, and the presence of pharmaceutical contaminants. These results reinforce their potential application in bioremediation processes in extreme environments.
3. Data Description
3.1. Morphological description of isolated strains HS4–2 and TXO1–1SG1
The strains isolated from saline-sodium sediment were macroscopically described as colonies 2–4 mm in diameter, flat and oval, beige in color, and dry. They differ in that strain HS4–2 has serrated edges and is friable, whereas strain TXO1–1SG1 has defined edges and a creamy consistency. Microscopically, both strains are Gram-positive bacilli.
3.2. Resilience to multiple stresses
The two strains were characterized based on their growth across different NaCl concentrations, pH levels, and various concentrations of diclofenac, ibuprofen, and ketoprofen. Strain HS4–2 had an adequate development in a NaCl range of 0 – 2.5µ M, with optimal growth at 0µ M, showing the beginning of the stationary phase after 96 h of incubation; while its growth at different pH levels indicates that it tolerates both acidic and alkaline environments, as it grew in the range of 5–11, with optimal growth at pH 6, 7, and 8, and the stationary phase observed after 96 h of incubation.
The strain was moderately tolerant to 10 µM diclofenac in the medium. In contrast, at 100 µM and 1000 µM, growth was minimal compared to the biotic control. Tolerance to ibuprofen was higher, as it developed at concentrations of 10 µM, 100 µM, and 1000 µM of the contaminant. Observing that cell death began at 96 h at the highest concentration, while at the other concentrations, this phase began at 120 h. Growth in the presence of ketoprofen was moderate at 10 µM and 100 µM, whereas at 1000 µM, growth was minimal compared to the biotic control. Fig. 1 illustrates the development of strain HS4–2 under various stress factors, highlighting its resilience.
Fig. 1.
Growth of Bacillus safensis HS4–2 under different concentrations of a) NaCl, b) different pH conditions, c) in the presence of diclofenac, d) in the presence of ibuprofen, and e) in the presence of ketoprofen.
The growth range of strain TXO1–1SG1 in the presence of NaCl was 0 – 2.5 µM, with optimal growth at 1.7 µM, where the stationary phase begins after 168 h of incubation, and the cell death phase is observed after 240 h of incubation. Likewise, the strain grew over a pH range of 5–11, with optimal growth at 6. Again, the stationary phase began at 168 h, and cell death at 240 h.
The TXO1–1SG strain grows best at a 10 µM concentration of diclofenac, starting cell death after 120 h of incubation. Growth at 100 µM and 1000 µM diclofenac was minimal compared to the biotic control. With ibuprofen, optimal growth occurs at 10 µM after 96 h, aligning with biotic control. At 100 µM, growth is moderate; at 1000 µM, it is minimal. In the presence of ketoprofen at 10 µM, 100 µM, and 1000 µM, growth is mild relative to biotic control. Fig. 2 illustrates the resilience of the TXO1–1SG1 strain.
Fig. 2.
Growth of Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1 at different concentrations of a) NaCl, b) different pH conditions, c) in the presence of diclofenac, d) in the presence of ibuprofen, and e) in the presence of ketoprofen.
Based on observed resilience, strains HS4–2 and TXO1–1SG1 are moderately halotolerant, exhibiting broad tolerance to both acidic and alkaline pH levels, as well as adaptability to pharmaceutical contaminants such as diclofenac, ibuprofen, and ketoprofen.
3.3. Genetic identification based on the 16S rRNA gene
The sequences were deposited and compared with the databases. The fragment size of strain HS4–2 was 1406 base pairs, identified as Bacillus safensis FO-36b in BLAST, with 100 % coverage and a similarity percentage of 99.72 %; while in EzBiocloud, the similarity percentage was 99.72 % with Bacillus safensis subsp safensis FO-36b, with 95.4 % coverage. The sequence is deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database with the access code PX401006.
For TXO1–1SG1, a fragment of 1412 base pairs were obtained; in BLAST, it had a similarity percentage of 99.72 % with Bacillus haynesii NRRL B-41,327 with 100 % coverage, while in EzBiocloud, the coverage was 95.9 % and a similarity percentage of 99.72 % with the previously mentioned species. The sequence is deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database with the access code PX401007.
3.4. Species assignment and genomic annotation
The HS4–2 strain was identified as Bacillus safensis, with an Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) of 98.5 %, a CheckM completeness of 99.12 %, and a genomic distance of 0.015. Three contigs were obtained, totaling 3697,781 base pairs (bp) and with a GC content of 41.6 %. 3849 genes were annotated, of which 3658 are coding, 24 are rRNA, 20 are ncRNA, and 81 are tRNA. Fig. 3 shows the annotated genome of strain HS4–2, which reveals six genes encoding enzymes involved in aromatic compound metabolism. The genome is deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database with the access code JBLQUJ000000000.1 (The NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) annotations can be accessed at: Bacillus safensis: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/gene/GCF_048159725.1/).
Fig. 3.
Bacillus safensis HS4–2, a) position in the genome of osmotic stress response genes, b) position in the genome of genes participating in encoding enzymes involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds, and c) distribution of subsystems and enzymes implicated in osmotic stress response and in the metabolism of aromatic compounds.
Fig. 4 displays the genome of strain TXO1–1SG1, classified as Bacillus haynesii, with an ANI of 99.5 %, CheckM completeness of 98.78 %, and a genomic distance of 0.005. Three contigs were assembled; the genome is 4232,822 bp long with a GC content of 46 %. A total of 4346 genes were annotated, including 4132 coding genes, 24 rRNA, 43 ncRNA, and 85 tRNA genes. Eleven genes encoding enzymes for metabolizing aromatic compounds were identified. The NCBI accession number for the Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1 genome data is NZ_JBLGEH000000000.1 (NCBI PGAP can be accessed at Bacillus haynesii: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/gene/GCF_049068305.1/).
Fig. 4.
Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1, a) position in the genome of osmotic stress response genes, b) position in the genome ofgenes participating in encoding enzymes involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds, and c) distribution of subsystems and enzymes implicated in osmotic stress response and in the metabolism of aromatic compounds.
Table 1 shows the genes involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds found in the genomes of Bacillus safensis HS4–2, also shows the genes implicated in osmotic stress. On the other hand, Table 2 shows Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1 genes for osmotic stress and genes involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds. Both strains harbor genes for the metabolism of aromatic compounds like yisk, aroD and aroQ, as well as genes that participate in osmoregulation like opuAC, opuAB, opuD and betB.
Table 1.
Genes involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds and osmotic stress were found in the genome of Bacillus safensis HS4–2.
| Genes involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genome location | Locus tag | Name | Symbol |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:286,235–286,630 | ACLKGD_RS014 | VOC family protein | |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:551,122–551,895 | ACLKGD_RS02620 | type I 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase | aroD |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:2378,748–2379,191 | ACLKGD_RS12020 | type II 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase | aroQ |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:981,934–982,836 | ACLKGD_RS04890 | shikimate dehydrogenase | aroE_1 |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:3499,403–3500,308 | ACLKGD_RS17820 | fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase family protein | yisK |
| Genes involved in osmotic stress | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genome location | Locus tag | Name | Symbol |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:576,832–577,713 | ACLKGD_RS02 | glycine betaine ABC transporter substrate-binding protein | opuAC |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:577,713–578,558 | ACLKGD_RS027 | glycine/proline betaine ABC transporter permease subunit | opuAB |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:578,569–579,834 | ACLKGD_RS02750 | glycine/proline betaine ABC transporter ATP-binding protein | opuAA |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:1544,053–1545,201 | ACLKGD_RS076 | betaine/proline/choline family ABC transporter ATP-binding | opuCA_2 |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:1545,215–1545,868 | ACLKGD_RS07 | ABC transporter permease | opuCB |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:1545,882–1546,799 | ACLKGD_RS07655 | osmoprotectant ABC transporter substrate-binding protein | opuCC |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:1546,821–1547,510 | ACLKGD_RS07660 | ABC transporter permease | opuCD |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:1825,907–1827,376 | ACLKGD_RS09155 | betaine-aldehyde dehydrogenase | betB |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:1827,404–1828,612 | ACLKGD_RS0916 | iron-containing alcohol dehydrogenase | gbsB |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:1910,106–1911,638 | ACLKGD_RS09690 | glycine betaine transporter OpuD | opuD |
| NZ_JBLQUJ010000002.1:3623,482–3624,297 | ACLKGD_RS184 | Glycerol uptake facilitator protein | glpF |
Table 2.
Genes involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds and osmotic stress were found in the genome of Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1.
| Genes involved in the metabolism of aromatic compounds | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genome location | Locus tag | Name | Symbol |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000001.1:37,299–38,130 | ACLKGG_RS00235 | Nitrilotriacetate monooxygenase | |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000003.1:381,545–382,309 | ACLKGG_RS2037 | type I 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase | aroD |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000001.1:689,931–690,836 | ACLKGG_RS03580 | fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase family protein | yisK |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:694,391–694,828 | ACLKGG_RS0708 | type II 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase | aroQ |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1956,036–1957,241 | ACLKGG_RS13670 | 4-hydroxybenzoate 3-monooxygenase | pobA |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1957,257–1958,633 | ACLKGG_RS13675 | MFS transporter | pcaK |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1958,672–1959,523 | ACLKGG_RS13680 | extradiol ring-cleavage dioxygenase | hpcB |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:2768,205–2768,774 | ACLKGG_RS17670 | non-oxidative hydroxyarylic acid decarboxylases subunit B | bsdB |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:2768,788–2770,209 | ACLKGG_RS17675 | non-oxidative hydroxyarylic acid decarboxylases subunit C | bsdC |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:2770,229–2770,456 | ACLKGG_RS17680 | non-oxidative hydroxyarylic acid decarboxylases subunit D | bsdD |
| Genes involved in osmotic stress | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genome location | Locus tag | Name | Symbol |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:700,407–701,291 | ACLKGG_RS07120 | glycine betaine ABC transporter substrate-binding protein | opuAC |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:701,291–702,145 | ACLKGG_RS07125 | glycine/proline betaine ABC transporter permease subunit OpuAB | OpuAB |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:702,145–703,401 | ACLKGG_RS07130 | glycine/proline betaine ABC transporter ATP-binding protein OpuAA | opuAA |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1224,565–1226,100 | ACLKGG_RS09855 | glycine betaine transporter OpuD | opuD |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1317,667–1318,875 | ACLKGG_RS10410 | iron-containing alcohol dehydrogenase | gbsB |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1318,893–1320,365 | ACLKGG_RS10415 | betaine-aldehyde dehydrogenase | betB |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1620,702–1621,379 | ACLKGG_RS120 | ABC transporter permease | opuCD |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1621,395–1622,312 | ACLKGG_RS120 | osmoprotectant ABC transporter substrate-binding lipoprotein OpuCC | opuCC |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1622,326–1622,979 | ACLKGG_RS12030 | ABC transporter permease | opuCB |
| NZ_JBLGEH010000002.1:1623,001–1624,140 | ACLKGG_RS12035 | betaine/proline/choline family ABC transporter ATP-binding protein | opuCA |
The datasets generated in this study, including phenotypic stress tolerance profiles and annotated draft genomes, provide a resource for comparative analyses of extremotolerant Bacillus species. These data may be useful for studies focused on microbial adaptation to saline and variable pH environments, as well as for genome-based screening of metabolic pathways associated with aromatic compound transformation.
4. Experimental Design, Materials, and Methods
4.1. Isolation and morphological characterization of strains
Strains HS4–2 and TXO1–1SG1 were isolated from saline-sodium sediment from Lake Texcoco in Mexico. The culture medium used was a halophilic medium (MH) for moderate halophiles (10 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L proteose peptone, 1 g/L dextrose, and 18 g/L bacteriological agar; supplemented with 5 % NaCl solution, sufficient for 1 L).
Macroscopic morphology was assessed based on size, color, shape, edges, elevation, texture, appearance, and malleability. Gram staining was also conducted on the strains to identify microscopic morphology.
4.2. Tolerance to multiple stress factors
4.2.1. NaCl and pH tolerance
Lake Texcoco is characterized as a naturally saline and alkaline environment, with reports of elevated salt concentrations and pH values frequently exceeding 9 in several zones. Based on this environmental background, the tolerance assays were designed to encompass an ecologically relevant interval while also extending beyond it to evaluate the full physiological tolerance of the strains. The range and concentration of NaCl for optimal growth of each strain were determined by inoculating them in MH broth at varying NaCl concentrations (0µ M, 0.5µ M, 0.9µ M, 1.7µ M, 2.5µ M y 3.4µ M) at a pH of 7. Aliquots of 1 mL were taken every 24 h, and the absorbance was measured at 600 nm in a spectrophotometer (EPOCH, Biotek), this wavelength indicates cellular growth [9]. The optimal range and pH for the strain's growth were determined by inoculating the strain into MH broth and adjusting the NaCl concentration to achieve optimal growth. The pH was adjusted to 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, and absorbance was measured daily at 600 nm in a spectrophotometer (EPOCH, Biotek). The tests were conducted in triplicate, and the means and standard deviations were used to construct the graphs.
4.3. Tolerance to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Flasks containing MH broth with diclofenac (Sigma-Aldrich®, D6899–25 G), ibuprofen (Sigma-Aldrich®, I4883–5 G), or ketoprofen (PROFENID®, DMXA004) at three concentrations (10 µM, 100 µM, and 1000 µM, methanol reactive degree was used as a solvent) were prepared. Published studies have reported degradation analyses of these drugs at a concentration of 100µ M [[10], [11], [12]]; for this reason, concentrations of 10µ M (lower than 100µ M) were also tested to determine whether the bacteria could adapt to the medium containing the contaminant, and concentrations of 1000µ M (higher than 100 µM) were tested because, although this is a high concentration, it is believed that the medium contains additional sources of carbon and growth factors that could facilitate tolerance.
A bacterial inoculum of strains HS4–2 or TXO1–1SG1 at 6 × 10⁸ cells/mL was added to these flasks. Biotic controls containing only the culture medium and bacterial inoculum were also prepared to compare the strain's normal growth with its growth in the presence of the contaminant
Both samples and controls were prepared in triplicate and incubated at 37 °C for 120 h (5 days). Aliquots of 200 µL were taken every 24 h and measured in the spectrophotometer (EPOCH, Biotek) at 600 nm to assess bacterial growth [9]; culture medium without NSAIDs or bacterial inoculum was used as a blank for background-corrections of the lectures; the means and standard deviations were used to construct the graphs. The measurements taken indicate only the growth of the strains in the presence of the contaminants; no additional markers were measured.
4.4. DNA extraction
The Promega Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit was used to extract DNA according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis at 1 %. DNA extraction products were used to verify the presence of DNA and assess its quality.
4.5. Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene
The amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and universal primers 27F: 5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′ and 1492R: 5′-TAC GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3′
Commercial Taq DNA polymerase (Meridian Bioscience, Bio-21,105) was used to perform the reaction. The thermal cycle was set as follows: a pre-denaturation cycle at 94 °C for 5 min, denaturation at 94 °C for 60 s, annealing at 59 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 60 s, repeated 30 times, followed by a post-elongation cycle at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified products are visualized on a 1 % agarose gel and revealed with ethidium bromide for 7 s. Macrogen Korea's sequencing service was selected to process the amplified products.
4.6. Genetic identification of strains based on the 16S rRNA gene
The sequences obtained were reviewed and corrected with the Chromas Pro program [10]. Consensus sequences were assembled using BioEdit version 7.0.9 [11].
The consensus sequences were compared with sequences deposited in the GenBank databases using the BLAST [12] program from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and the EzBiocloud [13] server to determine the percentage of similarity.
4.7. DNA extraction for genome sequencing
Strains HS4–2 and TXO1–1SG1 were inoculated into MH broth from a pure colony and incubated at 37 °C for 72 h until sufficient biomass was obtained for DNA isolation. High-molecular-weight DNA was extracted from the strains using the MasterPure Complete DNA & RNA Purification Kit (LGC Biosearch Technologies, MV89010) according to the manufacturer's specifications. These two strains were sent to Plasmidsaurus (CA, USA) for sequencing [14].
4.8. Taxonomic assignment and genomic annotation
Genome sequencing was performed using a hybrid approach that combined Illumina and Nanopore platforms. The 5 % of lowest-quality reads were removed using Filtlong v0.2.1 [15] with default parameters. Subsequently, pre-assembly was performed with Miniasm v0.3 [16], after which the coverage was adjusted to a minimum of 100x. With the filtered sequences, final assembly and polishing were performed using Flye v2.9.1, with specific parameters optimized for high-quality ONT reads. Genome annotation was performed with Bakta v1.6.1 [17]. Contig analysis was performed with Bandage v0.8.1 [18]. Genome integrity and contamination were assessed with CheckM v1.2.2 [19]. Finally, species identification was performed with RapdTool v2.1.0. An additional annotation was added to the RAST server [20] to identify genes involved in stress response regulation and aromatic compound metabolism, given that the molecular structure of NSAIDs includes this type of ring. GCView [20] was used to generate a circular genome map.
Limitations
This study is based on phenotypic growth assays and genomic annotation. The potential for NSAID degradation is inferred from the presence of genes associated with aromatic compound metabolism; however, no analytical validation was performed. Therefore, the results should be interpreted as evidence of tolerance and a metabolic potential suggested by genomic annotation, rather than confirmed biodegradation. Additionally, the experiments were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, which may not fully reflect the environmental conditions of the original sampling site.
Ethics Statement
The authors have read and follow the ethical requirements for publication in Data in Brief and confirm that the current work does not involve human subjects, animal experiments, or any data collected from social media platforms.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Lorna Catalina Can-Ubando: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Keila Isaac-Olivé: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Ayixon Sánchez-Reyes: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Gauddy Lizeth Manzanares-Leal: Writing – review & editing. Ninfa Ramírez-Durán: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Secretariat of Research and Advanced Studies at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEMex) for its financial support through the research project “Análisis de genomas bacterianos de Bacillus sp. con potencial degradador de los antinflamatorios no esteroideos: Diclofenaco e Ibuprofeno” code 6543/2022CIB. The authors would like to thank to Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA) through the Aguas del Valle de México basin authority in Texcoco’s Lake, México.
This work is derived from the project “Degradación bacteriana de los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos diclofenaco e ibuprofeno determinada por UPLC-QTOF” corresponding to a Postdoctoral Academic Stay (CVU: 772750) granted by the Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (SECIHTI), México.
This product was developed with the support of the academic and collaborative network “Microbiología y Química en Ciencias de la Salud”
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.
Footnotes
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2026.112776.
Contributor Information
Lorna Catalina Can-Ubando, Email: lccanu@uaemex.mx.
Keila Isaac-Olivé, Email: kisaaco@uaemex.mx.
Ayixon Sánchez-Reyes, Email: ayixon.sanchez@ibt.unam.mx.
Gauddy Lizeth Manzanares-Leal, Email: glmanzanarezl001@profesor.uaemex.mx.
Ninfa Ramírez-Durán, Email: nramirezd@uaemex.mx.
Appendix. Supplementary materials
Figure 5. Growth of Bacillus safensis HS4–2 in petri plates at different salt concentrations a)0µ M, b)0.5µ M, c)0.9µ M, d)1.7µ M, e)2.5µ M and f)3.4µM
Figure 6. Growth of Bacillus safensis HS4–2 in petri plates at different pH conditions a) pH=5, b) pH=6, c) pH=7, d) pH=8, e) pH=9, f) pH=10 and g) pH=11
Figure 7. Growth of Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1 in petri plates at different salt concentrations a)0µ M, b)0.5µ M, c)0.9µ M, d)1.7µ M, e)2.5µ M and f)3.4µM
Figure 8. Growth of Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1 in petri plates at different pH conditions a) pH=5, b) pH=6, c) pH=7, d) pH=8, e) pH=9, f) pH=10 and g) pH=11
Figure 9. Agarose gel electrophoresis (1 %) stained with ethidium bromide showing amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. Lane 1: 1 kb DNA Ladder molecular weight marker (Thermo Scientific); Lane 2: negative control; Lane 3: positive control; Lane 4: Bacillus safensis HS4–2; Lane 5: Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1
Figure 10. Agarose gel electrophoresis (1 %) stained with ethidium bromide showing amplification of DNA. Lane 1: 1 kb DNA Ladder molecular weight marker (Thermo Scientific); Lane 2: positive control; Lane 3: Bacillus safensis HS4–2; Lane 4: Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1; Lane 5: negative control
Data Availability
National Center for Biotechnology InformationBacillus haynesii strain TXO1-1SG1, whole genome shotgun sequencing project (Original data).
National Center for Biotechnology InformationBacillus safensis strain HS4-2, whole genome shotgun sequencing project (Original data).
References
- 1.Wang J., Zhao S.-Q., Zhang M.-Y., He B.-S. Targeted eco-pharmacovigilance for ketoprofen in the environment: need, strategy and challenge. Chemosphere. 2018;194:450–462. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.C.L. Gomez et al., Selection of substances for the 4th Watch List under the Water Framework Directive, JRC Publications Repository. Accedido: 7 de septiembre de 2025. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC130252.
- 3.Adıgüzel S.K., Odabaşı S.Ü., Yabalak E., Kaya N.G., Mazmancı B., Adıgüzel A.O. A durable biocatalyst constructed by immobilization of recombinant laccase-like multicopper oxidase from Bacillus mojavensis onto hazelnut shell hydrochar: its characterization and potential for use in the degradation of sulfamethoxazole and diclofenac. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;315(Pt 2) doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Can-Ubando L.C., et al. Degradation of Diclofenac and Ketoprofen by Bacillus Paralicheniformis HAS-1, strain isolated from a soda lake sediment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2025;236(8):536. doi: 10.1007/s11270-025-08187-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chopra S., Kumar D. Characterization and biodegradation of ibuprofen by Bacillus siamensis strain DSI-1 isolated from wastewater. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei. 2022;33(3):643–652. doi: 10.1007/s12210-022-01085-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marchlewicz A., Guzik U., Smułek W., Wojcieszyńska D. Exploring the degradation of Ibuprofen by Bacillus thuringiensis B1(2015b): the new pathway and factors affecting degradation. Molecules. 2017;22(10):1676. doi: 10.3390/molecules22101676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.M. Soto, Biodegradation of ibuprofen and metformin by bacteria isolated from Chihuahua, Mexico. Accedido: 8 de septiembre de 2025. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://cathi.uacj.mx/handle/20.500.11961/30300.
- 8.Górny D., Guzik U., Hupert-Kocurek K., Wojcieszyńska D. Naproxen ecotoxicity and biodegradation by Bacillus thuringiensis B1(2015b) strain. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;167:505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abkar L., Wilfart F.M., Piercey M., Gagnon G.A. Enhanced reproducibility and precision of high-throughput quantification of bacterial growth data using a microplate reader. J. Vis. Exp. (JoVE) 2022;(185) doi: 10.3791/63849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.ChromasPro | Technelysium Pty Ltd. 2025. https://technelysium.com.au/wp/chromaspro/ Accedido: 28 de mayo de.
- 11.T. Hall, Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/nt. Accedido: 22 de septiembre de 2025. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/BIOEDIT%3A-A-USER-FRIENDLY-BIOLOGICAL-SEQUENCE-EDITOR-Hall/0ae262d9cf78536754bc064e07113ab5e978f208.
- 12.Benson D.A., et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D37–D42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoon S.-H., et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017;67(5):1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Plasmidsaurus :: sequence everything. Accedido: 28 de mayo de 2025. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://plasmidsaurus.com/.
- 15.GitHub; 2025. Releases · Rrwick/Filtlong.https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong/releases Accedido: 28 de mayo de[En línea]. Disponible en: [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li H. Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(14):2103–2110. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schwengers O., Jelonek L., Dieckmann M.A., Beyvers S., Blom J., Goesmann A. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb. Genom. 2021;7(11) doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wick R.R., Schultz M.B., Zobel J., Holt K.E. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(20):3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parks D.H., Imelfort M., Skennerton C.T., Hugenholtz P., Tyson G.W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stothard P., Wishart D.S. Circular genome visualization and exploration using CGView. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(4):537–539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure 5. Growth of Bacillus safensis HS4–2 in petri plates at different salt concentrations a)0µ M, b)0.5µ M, c)0.9µ M, d)1.7µ M, e)2.5µ M and f)3.4µM
Figure 6. Growth of Bacillus safensis HS4–2 in petri plates at different pH conditions a) pH=5, b) pH=6, c) pH=7, d) pH=8, e) pH=9, f) pH=10 and g) pH=11
Figure 7. Growth of Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1 in petri plates at different salt concentrations a)0µ M, b)0.5µ M, c)0.9µ M, d)1.7µ M, e)2.5µ M and f)3.4µM
Figure 8. Growth of Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1 in petri plates at different pH conditions a) pH=5, b) pH=6, c) pH=7, d) pH=8, e) pH=9, f) pH=10 and g) pH=11
Figure 9. Agarose gel electrophoresis (1 %) stained with ethidium bromide showing amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. Lane 1: 1 kb DNA Ladder molecular weight marker (Thermo Scientific); Lane 2: negative control; Lane 3: positive control; Lane 4: Bacillus safensis HS4–2; Lane 5: Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1
Figure 10. Agarose gel electrophoresis (1 %) stained with ethidium bromide showing amplification of DNA. Lane 1: 1 kb DNA Ladder molecular weight marker (Thermo Scientific); Lane 2: positive control; Lane 3: Bacillus safensis HS4–2; Lane 4: Bacillus haynesii TXO1–1SG1; Lane 5: negative control
Data Availability Statement
National Center for Biotechnology InformationBacillus haynesii strain TXO1-1SG1, whole genome shotgun sequencing project (Original data).
National Center for Biotechnology InformationBacillus safensis strain HS4-2, whole genome shotgun sequencing project (Original data).




