Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1977 Winter;10(4):673–678. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-673

Differential effects of fixed- and variable-time feedback on production rates of elementary school children

Richard W Saudargas 1,2,3, Charles H Madsen Jr 1,2,3,1, John W Scott 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1311245  PMID: 16795573

Abstract

The performance of 26 third-grade students who worked on individual weekly academic tasks was compared under fixed- and variable-time “home reports”. During fixed-time home reports, each student was given a report to take home on Friday that indicated the quantity of work the student had completed that week, contained comments concerning the quality of the work, and had a space for parental remarks and signature. The same report was given during the variable-time reports, except that seven to nine students were randomly selected each day to receive a home report. During variable-time reporting, students completed more assignments and completed assignments on a greater percentage of available workdays than during fixed-time reporting. The teachers' preference for the variable-time reporting was one additional advantage for the variable system.

Keywords: elementary classwork, production rates, variable schedule, fixed schedule, feedback, children

Full text

PDF
673

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bijou S. W., Orlando R. Rapid development of multiple-schedule performances with retarded children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jan;4(1):7–16. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lovitt T. C., Esveldt K. A. The relative effects on math performance of single- versus multiple-ratio schedules: a case study. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Winter;3(4):261–270. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mawhinney V. T., Bostow D. E., Laws D. R., Blumenfeld G. J., Hopkins B. L. A comparison of students studying-behavior produced by daily, weekly, and three-week testing schedules. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Winter;4(4):257–264. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schroeder S. R. Parametric effects of reinforcement frequency, amount of reinforcement, and required response force on sheltered workshop behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Winter;5(4):431–441. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Weiner H. Controlling human fixed-interval performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):349–373. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES