In the published article, the Ethics statement was erroneously given as “The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (protocol no. 1873045).”
The correct Ethics statement is “The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (protocol no. 1831045).”
In the published article, there was an error. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol number in the Materials and Methods section was incorrectly stated as 1873045 instead of the correct protocol number, 1831045.
A correction has been made to the section Materials and Methods, Animals, First Paragraph:
“The main study was a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (protocol no. 1831045).”
The original version of this article has been updated.
Footnotes
Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.