Skip to main content
Journal of Neuroinflammation logoLink to Journal of Neuroinflammation
. 2026 Mar 18;23:143. doi: 10.1186/s12974-026-03772-9

Single-cell RNA sequencing uncovers neutrophil clusters associated with autoimmune neuroinflammation

Yong Wang 1, William J Turbitt 1,5, Lianna Zhou 1, Zhaoqi Yan 1,6, Sweta B Patel 2,7, Wei Yang 1,8, Zhang Li 1, Jessica A Buckley 1, Grace Mulia 1, Robert S Welner 2, William R Meador 3, Chander Raman 4, Hongwei Qin 1,, Etty N Benveniste 1,
PMCID: PMC13112694  PMID: 41851894

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by multifocal inflammation and axonal degeneration, driven by innate and adaptive immune cells. The Janus Kinase (JAK)/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STAT)/Suppressors Of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) pathway regulates immune cell activity, with SOCS proteins functioning as negative regulators. Using the Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS, our prior work demonstrated that mice lacking Socs3 in myeloid cells (Socs3ΔLysM) developed severe, brain-targeted EAE (btEAE), with increased cerebellar infiltration of activated neutrophils.

To define neutrophil-specific roles, we generated mice with Socs3 deletion restricted to neutrophils (Socs3ΔLy6G). Following MOG-induced EAE, these mice exhibited clinical features identical to Socs3ΔLysM mice, including severe cerebellar demyelination, increased cerebellar infiltration of activated neutrophils and CD4+ T-cells, and clinical symptoms of both btEAE and classical EAE (cEAE), the latter involving the spinal cord (SC). Cerebellar neutrophils from Socs3ΔLy6G mice exhibited a primed, inflammatory phenotype with elevated reactive oxygen species, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and heightened production of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines. Neutrophil depletion alleviated btEAE, confirming their pathogenic role.

Single-cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-Seq) of cerebellum (CB) and SC neutrophils revealed five clusters in naïve and EAE mice, with expansion of two clusters (Neu2 and Neu4) in Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE. Neu2, Neu3 and Neu4 clusters showed high expression of Saa3, Il1b and Cxcl2, with Neu4 enriched in cytokine signaling pathways and inflammatory responses. Strikingly, Saa3 mRNA and protein expression were markedly increased in the CB and SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE compared to controls. Translationally, the human orthologue SAA1 was significantly elevated in plasma from MS patients relative to healthy controls.

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that Socs3 deficiency unleashes pathogenic neutrophil activity in Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE. They further demonstrate neutrophil heterogeneity within the inflamed CNS and define inflammatory transcriptional states, with Saa3/SAA1 as a potential biomarker and/or target in autoimmune neuroinflammation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-026-03772-9.

Keywords: Suppressors Of Cytokine Signaling 3 (SOCS3), Serum Amyloid A3 (SAA3), Brain-targeted Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (btEAE), Single-cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-Seq), Neutrophils

Introduction

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by immune-mediated demyelination, neuroinflammation, and progressive neurodegeneration [14]. While adaptive immune cells such as T and B lymphocytes are well established as key drivers of MS and its animal model, Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE), the roles of innate immune cells remain less defined [3, 5, 6]. Over twenty FDA-approved disease-modifying therapies reduce relapse rates in relapsing-remitting MS; however, none halt long-term progression, underscoring the need to identify pathogenic and protective immune subsets through high-resolution profiling [7].

The Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway, activated by more than 70 cytokines, is central to immune regulation [811]. Aberrant STAT activation has been reported in MS, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [8, 1216]. Suppressors Of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) proteins serve as negative feedback regulators of JAK/STAT signaling [9, 1720], and dysregulated Socs3 expression in MS correlates with enhanced STAT3 activation [21, 22]. Our prior work showed that pharmacologic JAK/STAT inhibition ameliorates EAE by suppressing pathogenic T-cell differentiation, dampening myeloid activation, and limiting leukocyte infiltration into the CNS [8, 23].

EAE manifests as distinct clinical subtypes: classical EAE (cEAE), with ascending paralysis and spinal cord (SC) inflammation, and brain-targeted EAE (btEAE), marked by ataxia, tremors, and cerebellar (CB) inflammation [6, 2428]. Previously, we showed that mice lacking Socs3 in myeloid cells (Socs3ΔLysM) develop a severe mixed phenotype with both cEAE and btEAE. The btEAE phenotype depends on cerebellar neutrophil infiltration and activation [2426]. These findings suggest that myeloid SOCS3 restrains region-specific CNS inflammation and neutrophil-driven pathology.

Neutrophils are increasingly recognized as important mediators of neuroinflammation across several CNS disorders, including MS, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, AD, PD, and stroke [2938]. In MS, neutrophils display hyperactivation characterized by increased degranulation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [3941]. Neutrophils are among the earliest immune cells to infiltrate the CNS, where they disrupt the blood–brain barrier (BBB), promote demyelination, and amplify inflammatory responses [4246]. Conversely, neutrophils can exert protective roles, such as suppressing pathogenic B-cell responses [47] and promoting axon regeneration [4851]. While single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revealed neutrophil heterogeneity in MS and cEAE [4548, 52, 53], the diversity and function of these cells in btEAE remain poorly understood, revealing a critical knowledge gap relevant to disease mechanisms.

In this study, we generated mice with neutrophil-specific Socs3 deletion (Socs3ΔLy6G) to define the role of neutrophil-intrinsic JAK/STAT signaling in CNS autoimmunity. Socs3ΔLy6G mice developed both severe btEAE and cEAE, with the btEAE phenotype driven by Socs3-deficient neutrophils. Using single-cell transcriptomics, we identified distinct neutrophil subsets, including inflammatory clusters enriched in Socs3ΔLy6G mice during EAE. Importantly, Saa3 emerged as a candidate effector that warrants further investigation. Together, these findings link dysregulated neutrophil JAK/STAT signaling to brain-targeted neuroinflammation and reveal a previously unappreciated mechanism of neutrophil-mediated pathology in MS.

Materials and methods

Mice

Transgenic mice with the Socs3 locus flanked with flox sequences (Socs3fl/fl) [54], the generous gift of Dr. Warren Alexander (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research; Victoria, Australia), were bred at UAB. Socs3ΔLysM mice were generated as previously described [25]. Mice with Socs3 deletion exclusively in neutrophils (Socs3ΔLy6G) were generated by serial breeding of Socs3fl/fl mice with Ly6gCreTdtomato/+ mice (“Catchup mice”) [55], a generous gift from Professor Matthias Gunzer, Institute for Experimental Immunology and Imaging, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. The highly neutrophil-specific locus for Ly6g was genetically modified to drive expression of both Cre-recombinase and tdTomato. Ly6G+/− mice serve as controls. All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of UAB.

Human plasma samples

Subjects with MS and healthy controls (HC) were recruited from the UAB Comprehensive MS Center. Data were collected in a double-blinded manner until all data collection was completed. These studies were conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Institutional Review Board at UAB. All participants provided informed consent. EDTA plasma was collected in BD Vacutainer EDTA tubes and stored at − 80 °C [56]. Information on the MS patient cohort is summarized in Supplementary Table 1.

Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) induction and assessment

EAE was induced in Socs3fl/fl, Ly6G+/−, Socs3ΔLysM and Socs3ΔLy6G mice by s.c. injection of 200 µg MOG35–55 emulsified in CFA (Hooke Laboratories; 0.2 ml/mouse, supplemented with 2 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis) with i.p. injection of 100 ng Pertussis Toxin (Hooke Laboratories) on day 0 and a second dose of Pertussis Toxin on day 1, as previously described [25, 26, 57]. Mice experience cEAE, btEAE, and/or a mixed phenotype after EAE induction. cEAE was scored as follows: 0, no disease; 1, decreased tail tone; 2, hind limb weakness or partial paralysis; 3, complete hind limb paralysis; 4, front and hind limb paralysis; and 5, moribund state. Assessment of btEAE was as follows: 0, no disease; 1, hunched appearance, slight head tilt; 2, ataxia, scruffy coat; 3, severe head tilt, slight axial rotation, staggered walking; 4, severe axial rotation, spinning; and 5, moribund. For mixed phenotypes, cEAE and btEAE were scored separately [26]. Mice were sacrificed on days 12–14 at the peak of EAE for histology, flow cytometry and scRNA-Seq analysis. The CB and SC were isolated as previously described [26].

Assessment of demyelination and NET formation

Mice were anesthetized and intracardially perfused with PBS, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. CB tissues were fixed with 4% PFA at 4 °C overnight and then dehydrated with 30% sucrose. Cryoprotected CB tissues were embedded in an Optimal Cutting Temperature compound and cryosectioned to produce 40 μm slices in the sagittal plane from the center. Sections were stained using the Black Gold II Myelin Staining Kit (Millipore Sigma, AG105) [26, 58]. Images of stained sections were acquired with the Keyence Microscope BZ-X800. The total arbor vitae (white matter) area and the myelinated area (area of black-gold staining) of the CB were measured using the “Hybrid Cell Count” module provided by Keyence Microscope. “% Cerebellar Myelination Area” was defined as the myelinated area divided by the total arbor vitae area.

For assessment of NET formation, CB tissues were cryosectioned to produce 15 μm slices in the sagittal plane from the center. The slides were stained for citrullinated histone 3 (citH3), a biomarker of NET formation, the neutrophil marker Ly6G, and DAPI. After immunofluorescence staining, all images within a group were captured and processed under identical acquisition settings. Spinning disc confocal imaging was performed using a Nikon Ti2 Eclipse spinning disk confocal microscope. The NIS-Elements AR software package was used to count Ly6G+ cells and Ly6G+citH3+ cells, as well as the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of citH3. Three to six CB sections per animal were analyzed after staining.

Antibodies and cytokines

For flow cytometry experiments, antibodies (Abs) directed against murine CD11b (M1/70), CD45 (30-F11), Ly6C (HK1.4), Ly6G (1A8), CXCR2 (SA044G4), CD62L (MEL-14), CD63 (NVG-2), CD3 (17A2), CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53 − 6.7), CD44 (IM7), IFN-γ (XMG1.2) and IL-17 A (TC11-18H10.1) were from BioLegend (San Diego, CA). The LIVE/DEAD® Fixable Aqua Stain kit (L34957) was from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA).

Neutralizing anti-Ly6G Ab (clone 1A8) and isotype control Ab (rat IgG2a, clone 2A3) were purchased from Bio X Cell (West Lebanon, NH). For the neutrophil depletion experiment, mice were treated i.p. with 200 µg anti-Ly6G or isotype control Abs at the indicated time points. We have previously validated the efficacy of the anti-Ly6G Ab in vivo, with ~ 85% neutrophil depletion [24, 59].

Flow cytometry

For surface protein detection, cells were incubated with Fc Block (2.4G2) for 15 min. and washed, followed by incubation with viability dye and the indicated Abs, as previously described [26]. CM-H2DCFDA, a general oxidative stress indicator, was used to detect total ROS production [60, 61]. For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stimulated with PMA (25 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 µg/ml) in the presence of GolgiStop (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) for 4 h and permeabilized using the BD Fixation/Permeabilization Kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), as previously described [62].

For analysis of cells from the EAE experiments, mice were sacrificed and whole-body perfusion was performed. Mononuclear cells were isolated from the CB and SC using a 30%/70% Percoll gradient. Cell phenotypes were determined based on surface and intracellular staining patterns analyzed by flow cytometry, as previously described [23, 25, 26]. All flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo software (version 10.8.1; TreeStar, Ashland, OR).

Cytokine/chemokine analysis

The supernatant of CB and SC tissue homogenates was used to determine cytokine and chemokine levels as measured by the Cytokine/Chemokine Multiplex ELISA assay (Millipore, St. Louis, MO) as previously described [63]. Analyte concentrations were normalized by protein concentration.

Sorting of neutrophils

Mononuclear cells were isolated from the CB and SC of Ly6G+/− or Socs3ΔLy6G EAE mice as previously described [24, 64]. CD45+CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow neutrophils were isolated by flow cytometry.

Quantitative RT-PCR

500–1000 ng of RNA from sorted neutrophils was used as a template for cDNA synthesis. qRT-PCR was performed using TaqMan primers purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The resulting data were analyzed using the comparative cycle threshold method to calculate relative RNA quantities [57].

ELISA

The murine SAA3 ELISA kit (EZMSAA3-12 K; EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA determined the concentrations of SAA3 in murine plasma and supernatants from CB and SC tissue homogenates. The human SAA1 ELISA kit (DY3019-05; R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) detected human SAA1 in plasma samples from MS patients and HC. The Nu.Q® . Discovery H3.1 ELISA kit (1001-01-03; Volition, Carlsbad, CA) quantified nucleosomes in plasma samples from MS patients and HC, as well as in murine plasma and supernatants of CB and SC tissue homogenates.

Cell isolation and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq)

Due to the scarcity of CD45+CD11b+ cells in the CB of naïve mice (both Ly6G+/− and Socs3ΔLy6G) and Ly6G+/− mice with cEAE, we could not perform scRNA-Seq on cells from the CB of these mice. Mononuclear immune cells were isolated from the SC of naïve Ly6G+/− or Socs3ΔLy6G mice, from the SC and CB at the peak of EAE disease at day 12 for Socs3ΔLy6G mice, or from the SC at the peak of EAE disease at day 14 for Ly6G+/− mice following anesthetization, intracardial PBS perfusion and a 30%/70% Percoll gradient separation [26]. Sorted live CD45+CD11b+ cells from the SC of Ly6G+/− mice with EAE (n = 3), from the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE (n = 3), and from the combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/− (n = 3), and naïve Socs3ΔLy6G (n = 4) mice were subjected to scRNA-Seq. One biological sample consisted of samples pooled from three mice with TotalSeq™-B Hashtag antibodies from BioLegend [65]. All sorted CD45+CD11b+ cell libraries were prepared using the 10X Genomics Chromium Single Cell 3′ Reagent Kit V3.1 and sequenced on Illumina NextSeq 500 as previously described [45, 47, 48, 66]. Raw base call files were demultiplexed into FASTQ files. Sequencing files were processed and mapped to mm10, and count matrices were extracted using the Cell Ranger Single Cell Software (v 7.1.0) [45, 67, 68].

scRNA-Seq analysis

The count matrices in the h5 file format generated from Cell Ranger were imported into the Partek Flow (Partek Inc) pipeline [67, 69]. Single-cell quality control was performed by applying an inclusion filter on counts per cell (500-15000) and detected genes per cell (250–5000). Cells with greater than 10% mitochondrial gene expression were excluded to eliminate apoptotic or dying cells [70].

The dataset was also applied by setting the noise reduction filter to exclude features where the value ≤ 0 in at least 99.9% of cells. The filtered dataset was normalized and scaled with the SCTransform workflow. The scRNA-Seq data were integrated with the Harmony package. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on the SCTransform-scaled data. The PCA data node was chosen to perform graph-based clustering based on the Louvain algorithm, with the number of PCA set to 20. The data was visualized using 3D Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) dimensional reduction with the first 20 principal components. Cell annotations for each cluster were determined using the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in computed biomarkers and canonical markers following the classification workflow in Partek Flow [67, 71].

CD45+CD11b+ cells from four conditions are as follows: combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/− (356 cells) and naïve Socs3ΔLy6G mice (795 cells); SC of Ly6G+/− EAE mice (4,106 cells); SC of Socs3ΔLy6G EAE mice (11,394 cells); and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G EAE mice (10,639 cells).

The neutrophil clusters were subsetted from all of the cell clusters. Neutrophils from four different conditions are as follows: combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/− mice (114 cells) and naïve Socs3ΔLy6G mice (263 cells); SC of Ly6G+/− EAE mice (2,102 cells); SC of Socs3ΔLy6G EAE mice (6,458 cells); and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G EAE (6,914 cells). DEGs between different samples were determined by the Hurdle model on log2-normalized counts. The dot plots and violin plots were generated with sc.pl.dotplot and sc.pl.violin functions in Scanpy (1.9.1) package [72] using the annotated h5ad files exported from Partek workflow [67].

Pseudotime analysis

Pseudotime analysis of neutrophil clusters was performed using Monocle3 (version 1.4.26) [73]. The learn graph function was employed to compute a principal graph with UMAP coordinates. Then the order of cell function was used to calculate the pseudotime value of each cell. The Neu1 cluster was identified as the root cell state.

Pathway enrichment analysis

GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis): DEG analysis between individual neutrophils versus other neutrophil clusters was performed with Gene Specific Analysis (GSA) test in Partek workflow [67]. The exported DEG list was ranked by -log(P) and converted to an RNK file, which was uploaded to GSEA software (Version 4.3.2, BROAD Institute) to run GSEAPreRanked by choosing a hallmark gene sets database [74]. The pathway analysis results were plotted in terms of normalized enrichment score (NES) and false discovery rate (FDR) using the ggplot2 (Version 3.4.0) package in RStudio.

NicheNet analysis

The annotated h5ad files were read into R using the anndata package. The Seurat object [75, 76] was created for NicheNet analysis. The expression data of interacting cells was extracted from the Seurat object of integrated data. Neu1, Neu2, Neu3, Neu4 and Neu5 clusters were defined as the sender cell populations and macrophages or microglia were defined as the receiver cell populations. One comparison of interest was Socs3ΔLy6G CB versus Ly6G+/− SC: the condition of interest was set to CB from Socs3ΔLy6G mice and the reference condition was set to SC of Ly6G+/− mice. NicheNet analysis was performed according to the published workflow utilizing published ligand-target, ligand-receptor network and weighted integrated networks [77]. The selected differentially expressed ligand or receptor was visualized in violin plots.

Statistics

Significant differences between the two groups were analyzed by two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test distribution and Mann-Whitney rank sum test. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used to compare differences for multiple groups. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test was used to compare the differences at the indicated time points for EAE scores. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001.

Data set availability

ScRNA-Seq data will be available online. The single-cell data have been deposited in the GEO under the accession number GSE304332. Raw files supporting our findings are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Results

Mice with targeted deletion of Socs3 in neutrophils exhibit brain-targeted EAE

Our previous work established that Socs3ΔLysM mice develop severe btEAE [26], but Socs3 deletion in both neutrophils and macrophages precluded identifying the responsible cell type. To assess whether Socs3 deficiency in neutrophils induces brain-targeted neuroinflammation, mice with neutrophil-specific Socs3 deletion (Socs3ΔLy6G) were generated. Effective gene deletion was confirmed by genotyping and reduced Socs3 mRNA levels (data not shown). Ly6G+/− mice preserve normal neutrophil development, frequency and function, as demonstrated in the original Catchup model characterization [55]. Ly6G+/− mice, used as controls, showed classical EAE (cEAE) scores similar to Socs3fl/fl mice (Fig. 1A) and did not develop brain-targeted EAE (btEAE) (data not shown), consistent with previous findings [26]. Thus, Ly6G haploinsufficiency does not alter neutrophil maturation or activation under baseline or inflammatory conditions, making these mice suitable controls for the Socs3 deficient model.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Socs3 △Ly6G mice exhibit comparable brain-targeted EAE to Socs3 △LysM mice and disease induction requires neutrophils. EAE was induced in Socs3fl/fl, Ly6G+/-, Socs3 △LysM and Socs3 △Ly6G mice. (A) Classical EAE scoring for Socs3fl/fl and Ly6G+/- mice. (B) Brain-targeted EAE scoring for Socs3 △LysM and Socs3 △Ly6G mice. (C) Classical EAE scoring for Socs3 △LysM and Socs3 △Ly6G mice. (D) Survival analysis for Socs3 △LysM and Socs3 △Ly6G mice. (E) Neutrophil-specific depletion was performed in Socs3 △Ly6G mice via neutralizing anti-Ly6G Ab (clone 1A8; 200 μg) and isotype control Ab (rat IgG2a, clone 2A3; 200 μg) administered i.p. on days 0, 3 and 6 post immunization

Socs3ΔLy6G mice developed both severe btEAE and cEAE (Fig. 1B–C), with scores and survival curves closely matching those of Socs3ΔLysM mice (Fig. 1B–D). btEAE scores reached the peak at days 12–13 in Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 1B) while cEAE scores reached the peak at day 14 in Ly6G+/− mice (Fig. 1A). Antibody-mediated neutrophil depletion in Socs3ΔLysM mice reduced btEAE severity (Fig. 1E) but did not affect cEAE (data not shown), indicating that neutrophils are required for the brain-targeted disease phenotype. Thus, neutrophil-specific Socs3 deletion is sufficient to induce the mixed btEAE/cEAE phenotype previously observed in myeloid-specific knockout mice, establishing neutrophils as essential mediators of btEAE.

Cerebellar demyelination and immune cell infiltration in Socs3ΔLy6G mice

Due to the neurological manifestations of btEAE, cerebellar pathology and immune cell infiltration were evaluated in Socs3ΔLy6G mice. Black Gold staining demonstrated severe cerebellar demyelination at the peak of disease, with the myelinated area reduced to approximately 27% compared to 85% in controls (Fig. 2A–B). Flow cytometry confirmed increased total immune cell infiltration in the CB (Fig. 2C). There was an expansion of CD45hiCD11b⁺ myeloid cells and a reduction in CD45loCD11b⁺ microglia (Fig. 2D). Multiplex cytokine analysis of cerebellar homogenates revealed elevated G-CSF, IL-1α, IL-1β, CXCL2, TNF-α, GM-CSF, and CCL2 (Fig. 2E). These patterns indicate a pronounced pro-inflammatory environment. Socs3ΔLy6G mice exhibit pathology characterized by demyelination and a substantial inflammatory infiltrate, demonstrating that neutrophil-specific Socs3 loss establishes a pathogenic immune environment in the cerebellum.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Disease scores, cerebellar myelination, cerebellar immune cell infiltration and expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in Ly6G+/- and Socs3 △Ly6G mice. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3 △Ly6G mice. (A) Classical EAE scores for Ly6G+/- mice and brain-targeted EAE scores for Socs3 △Ly6G mice, sacrifice day, and percent cerebellar myelination. (B) Representative cerebellar myelin staining at the peak of EAE for Ly6G+/- and Socs3 △Ly6G mice. Arrows indicate demyelinated regions. (C) CB was collected at the peak of EAE to determine immune cell populations and the inflammatory milieu in the CB. Cerebellar total cells were counted. (D) Lymphoid cells (CD45+CD11b-), myeloid cells (CD45hiCD11b+), and microglia (CD45loCD11b+) percentages. (E) Cerebellar homogenates were collected at the peak of EAE and analyzed by Multiplex for cytokine and chemokine expression. ns: not significant

Neutrophil activation and NET formation

The activation state and functional properties of cerebellar neutrophils were investigated in Socs3ΔLy6G mice. Flow cytometry showed CD11b upregulation and CD62L downregulation, while CXCR4 and CXCR2 levels stayed unchanged (Fig. 3A). Both the frequency and absolute number of cerebellar neutrophils increased compared to controls, which exhibited few neutrophils in the cerebellum (Fig. 3B–C). Quantification of neutrophil infiltration per mg of CB in Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE confirmed significant neutrophil infiltration compared to controls (Fig. 3D). Socs3ΔLy6G neutrophils showed increased ROS production (Fig. 3E) and higher mRNA expression of inflammatory mediators (Fig. 3F). In inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, neutrophils release NETs, exacerbating tissue damage during sustained inflammation [7882]. To access NET formation in the CB, cryosections were stained with the neutrophil marker Ly6G and NET marker citrullinated histone H3 (citH3) and examined by confocal immunofluorescence imaging (Fig. 3G). The percentage of Ly6G+ cells (Fig. 3G and H) and Ly6G+citH3+ cells (Fig. 3G and I) were significantly increased in CB tissue from Socs3ΔLy6G mice compared to controls. Immunofluorescence staining for citH3 demonstrated clear NET formation in cerebellar lesions (Fig. 3G and J). NETs consist of long strains of decondensed chromatin, with nucleosomes containing repeating subunits of DNA and histone proteins as their basic units [83]. We used the Nu.Q Discovery H3.1 ELISA kit to quantify H3.1-nucleosomes for NET detection in plasma and tissue samples. Increased nucleosome release in plasma (Fig. 3K) and cerebellar tissue (Fig. 3L) was detected in Socs3ΔLy6G mice. Thus, Socs3 deficiency induces a hyperactivated, pro-inflammatory neutrophil phenotype characterized by NET formation, indicating that these cells are key effectors of CNS inflammation and demyelination.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Socs3 △Ly6G mice exhibit increased cerebellar neutrophils and NETs. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3 △Ly6G mice. Mice were sacrificed at the peak of EAE. . (A) CB neutrophils were subjected to surface staining. Ly6G+/- (n=11), Socs3 △Ly6G (n=11). (B) Percent of cerebellar neutrophils (CD45+CD11b+Ly6ClowLy6G+). △Ly6G+/- (n=13), Socs3 △Ly6G (n=20). (C) Total number of cerebellar-infiltrating neutrophils. Ly6G+/- (n=13), Socs3 △Ly6G (n=20). (D) Infiltrating neutrophil cell number normalized by CB weight. Ly6G+/- (n=5), Socs3 △Ly6G (n=5). (E) Cerebellar neutrophils were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with CM-H2DCFDA followed by flow cytometry. Ly6G+/- (n=6), Socs3 △Ly6G (n=6). (F) RNA was isolated from sorted cerebellar neutrophils and gene expression was analyzed by RT-PCR. Ly6G+/- (n=3), Socs3 △Ly6G (n=3). (G) EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3 △Ly6G mice. At the peak of cEAE and btEAE, respectively, the CB was fixed with 4% PFA overnight, then soaked with 30% sucrose for 3 days and embedded in OCT. NET formation was determined by staining for citrullinated histone 3 (citH3), and neutrophils were identified by Ly6G staining. (H) Quantification of Ly6G+ cells. (I) Quantification of Ly6G+citH3+ cells. . (J) MFI of citH3. Plasma (K) and CB (L) homogenate samples were collected at the peak of EAE. H3.1-nucleosome expression was quantified by ELISA. ns: not significant. MFI, mean fluorescent intensity

Spinal cord inflammation

Given that Socs3ΔLy6G mice exhibited cEAE symptoms, spinal cord (SC) pathology was also assessed. Flow cytometry indicated increased total infiltrates (Supplementary Fig. 1A), with a rise in CD11b⁺ myeloid cells and fewer microglia (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Socs3ΔLy6G neutrophil frequency and numbers increased in the SC compared to controls (Supplementary Fig. 1C–D). After quantification of neutrophils per mg of SC, there was an increased trend of neutrophil infiltration in the SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice (data not shown). Also, nucleosome levels were higher in both Socs3ΔLy6G and control EAE SCs compared to naïve mice (Supplementary Fig. 1E). Immunofluorescence staining revealed an increased percentage of Ly6G+ cells in the SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Supplementary Fig. 1F–G). As such, neutrophil activation and NET formation were observed in both the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice. This suggests that Socs3-deficient neutrophils contribute to CNS inflammation in multiple anatomical regions.

Increased neutrophils in spleen, skull Bone Marrow (BM) and femur BM

Skull bone marrow (BM) contributes to myeloid cell migration to inflamed brain tissue [84, 85]. Recent studies found that skull BM reflects inflammatory brain responses in patients with various neurological disorders, including MS [86]. To investigate the potential sources of CNS-infiltrating neutrophils, we examined spleen, skull BM and femur BM using flow cytometry. Socs3ΔLy6G mice exhibited an increased percentage of neutrophils in the spleen (Supplementary Fig. 2A), skull BM (Supplementary Fig. 2B) and femur BM (Supplementary Fig. 2C). These results indicate that CNS-infiltrating neutrophils could originate from either local skull BM and/or peripheral reservoirs, including femur BM and spleen.

Th1 CD4+ T-cells predominate in Socs3ΔLy6G mice

To determine whether neutrophil-driven inflammation influences adaptive immunity, T-cell subsets were profiled in the CB and SC. Socs3ΔLy6G mice exhibited increased total CD4⁺ T-cell numbers in the CB (Supplementary Fig. 3A). There was a significant elevation in IFN-γ–producing T helper 1 (Th1) cells (Supplementary Fig. 3B). A similar Th1 bias was observed in the SC (Supplementary Fig. 3C–D). Neutrophil-specific Socs3 deletion promotes a shift of CD4⁺ T-cells toward the Th1 phenotype, establishing a link between neutrophil activation and adaptive immune polarization in CNS autoimmunity.

scRNA-Seq reveals neutrophil heterogeneity and expansion of inflammatory subsets in Socs3ΔLy6G mice

To study transcriptional heterogeneity in neutrophils, we performed scRNA-Seq on CNS-infiltrating cells from Socs3ΔLy6G and control EAE mice. Cell clusters were annotated with top differentially expressed gene markers and canonical markers for neutrophils, macrophages, microglia, dendritic cells, T-cells and B-cells (Supplementary Fig. 4A). Unsupervised clustering identified five neutrophil subsets (Neu1–Neu5) (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Fig. 4A-B).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Socs3 △Ly6G mice exhibit a differential expansion in neutrophil clusters compared to Ly6G+/- mice. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3 Ly6G mice (n=3), and then SC and/or CB were collected at the peak of EAE (days 12-14). Live CD45+CD11b+ cells from the SC of Ly6G+/- mice with EAE (n=3), from the SC and CB of Socs3 △Ly6G mice with EAE (n=3), and from the combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/- mice (n=3) and naïve Socs3 △Ly6G mice (n=4) were subjected to scRNA-Seq. (A) Neutrophil clusters are shown by UMAP. (B) Percentage of the 5 neutrophil clusters shown in the 4 conditions. (C) Dot plot corresponding to neutrophil cluster genes. Dot size represents the percentage of cells in the cluster expressing the gene and dot color represents its average expression within the cluster. (D) Violin plots colored for differential cluster-defining genes. (E) Signaling pathways identified by GSEA pathway analysis in the 5 Neu clusters

We next investigated the differentiation or functional changes of neutrophil clusters using pseudotime trajectory analysis. The root node was set to the Neu1 cluster. We found that Neu2 and Neu4 deviated from Neu1 (Supplementary Fig. 4C-D), indicating different functional states expanded in disparate inflammatory conditions.

Neu1 was a quiescent group enriched in naïve SC, while Neu2–Neu4 had inflammatory signatures (Fig. 4A–D). Neu2 expressed Saa3, Il1b, Id2, Chil3, Csf3r, Hist1h2bc, and Klhl6. Neu3 expressed Ccl3 and Ccl4. Neu4 showed an interferon and chemokine profile including Saa3, Il1b, Cxcl2, Cxcl3, Cd14, Ifit1, Isg20, and Isg15 (Fig. 4C–D and Supplementary Fig. 5A–B). The top 25 marker genes from each Neu cluster are shown in Supplementary Fig. 5A. In Socs3ΔLy6G mice, Neu2 and Neu4 clusters expanded in both CB and SC, while Neu1 was nearly absent in the CB (Fig. 4A–B). The Neu5 cluster was detected at very low percentages in all four conditions (1–2%) (Fig. 4B). Gene set enrichment showed IFNα/γ response, IL-6–JAK–STAT3, TNFα–NF-κB, and general inflammatory pathways across Neu2-4, with Neu4 most enriched for these signatures (Fig. 4E). The STAT3–C/EBPβ axis is involved in emergency granulopoiesis [87, 88]. C/EBPβ is a critical transcription factor that promotes inflammatory cytokine production and survival of neutrophils [89]. STAT3 directly controls Cebpb expression during G-CSF or infection-driven emergency granulopoiesis [87]. JUNB, a transcription factor prominently expressed in activated neutrophils during inflammatory responses, plays a key role in enhancing neutrophil effector functions [89]. The Neu2, Neu3 and Neu4 clusters were enriched in Cebpb and Junb expression (Supplemental Fig. 6), consistent with their inflammatory gene signatures. Collectively, transcriptomic analysis reveals inflammatory neutrophil subsets expanded by Socs3 loss, with increased STAT3- and NF-κB-driven gene programs likely driving CNS pathology.

Transcriptomic analysis identifies Saa3 as one of the highly upregulated genes in Socs3ΔLy6G mice

DEG analysis revealed the top 20 upregulated genes in the four conditions (Fig. 5A). Saa3, Id2, Ly6a, Ifi207, Ifi204, Fcgr4, Ctss, Ifitm1 and Isg15 were increased in the SC of Ly6G+/− mice compared to the SC of naïve mice (Fig. 5A–B). Saa3, Id2, Chil3, Ly6a, Prnp, Entpd3, Cxcl2, Mmp19, Ifi207, Ifi204, Egr1, Acadl and Cd14 expression was elevated in the SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice compared to Ly6G+/− mice (Fig. 5A–C). Ly6a, Entpd3, Klhl6, Ifi207 and Ifi204 were increased in the CB compared to the SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 5A–B). Strikingly, Saa3 was markedly upregulated in neutrophils from the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice compared to Ly6G+/− (Fig. 5A–B). Cd14 and Cd274 expression was elevated in neutrophils from the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Enhanced EAE-related gene expression in Socs3 △Ly6G mice. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3△Ly6G mice (n=3), and then SC and/or CB were collected at the peak of EAE (days 12-14). Live CD45+CD11b+ cells from the SC of Ly6G+/- mice with EAE (n=3), from the SC and CB of Socs3 △Ly6G mice with EAE (n=3), and from the combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/- mice (n=3) and naïve Socs3 △Ly6G mice (n=4) were subjected to scRNA-Seq. Neutrophils from the 4 conditions were employed for the following analyses. (A) Dot plot corresponding to the top 20 genes related to the 4 conditions. (B) Violin plots colored for differential genes in the 4 conditions. (C) Dot plot corresponding to genes related to neutrophil surface markers in the 4 conditions. Dot size represents the percentage of cells expressing the gene and dot color represents its average expression within the group

Differential gene expression analysis identified Saa3 as one of the most highly induced genes in Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 5A–B). Saa3, with Id2, Chil3, Cxcl2, Mmp19, Ifi204, and Cd14, was upregulated in both SC and CB. CB neutrophils had even higher Saa3 expression. Saa3 transcripts were especially high in the Neu2–Neu4 clusters (Fig. 4C-D and Supplementary Fig. 6). GSEA confirmed robust activation of inflammatory cytokine and interferon pathways associated with Saa3. Saa3 serves as a marker of Socs3-deficient inflammatory neutrophils and may mediate amplification of neuroinflammation.

Neutrophil-macrophage/microglia interactions

To investigate intercellular communication underlying CNS inflammation, ligand–receptor analysis was conducted between neutrophils and macrophage/microglia [77]. Upregulation of Ccl4 in Neu2/Neu4 and Ccr1/Ccr5 in macrophages/microglia predicted enhanced myeloid recruitment (Supplementary Fig. 7A–C). Saa3 also increased in neutrophils and macrophages, while Tlr4 and Tlr2 rose in macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 7D–E, 7G). Saa3 can activate TLR2/TLR4 to boost cytokine production [9093]. These results suggest neutrophil-derived Saa3 activates macrophages and initiates a self-reinforcing inflammatory circuit. Saa3 induces a strong up-regulation of Saa3 transcripts, indicating the self-amplifying potential of Saa3 [94]. Socs3-deficient neutrophils promote pro-inflammatory crosstalk with macrophages via Saa3–TLR2/TLR4 signaling, establishing a feed-forward loop that sustains CNS inflammation.

Saa3 expression is markedly elevated in Socs3ΔLy6G mice

Transcriptomic analysis confirmed substantial Saa3 upregulation in the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice relative to controls (Fig. 6A). Saa3 was most highly expressed in the Neu2, Neu3, and Neu4 clusters, with the highest expression in the Neu4 cluster (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Fig. 4C–D), and was also expressed by macrophages and microglia (Supplementary Fig. 7G). RT–PCR confirmed elevated Saa3 transcripts in neutrophils isolated from both CB and SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 6B–C). At the protein level, Saa3 expression was increased in CB and SC homogenates and plasma from both Socs3ΔLy6G and Ly6G+/− mice with EAE compared to their corresponding naïve mice (Fig. 6D–F). The systemic Saa3 rise shows that neutrophil-specific Socs3 deficiency induces both local and peripheral inflammation. Saa3 upregulation reflects widespread inflammatory activation following Socs3 deletion.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Elevated Saa3 expression in CB and SC of Socs3 △Ly6G mice with EAE compared to Ly6G+/- mice with EAE. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3 △Ly6G mice (n=3), and then SC and/or CB were collected at the peak of EAE (days 12-14). Live CD45+CD11b+ cells from the SC of Ly6G+/- mice with EAE (n=3), from the SC and CB of Socs3 △Ly6G mice with EAE (n=3), and from the combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/- mice (n=3) and naïve Socs3 △Ly6G mice (n=4) were subjected to scRNA-Seq. Neutrophils from the 4 conditions were employed for the following analyses. (A) UMAP plot of Saa3 expression in the 4 conditions. RNA was isolated from sorted neutrophils (CD45+CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow) from the CB. (B) and SC (C) of Ly6G+/- and Socs3 △Ly6G mice with EAE and Saa3 expression was analyzed by RT-PCR. Saa3 protein expression was quantified by ELISA in tissue homogenates of CB. (D) and SC (E) and in plasma (F) from Ly6G+/- and Socs3 △Ly6G naïve mice and those with EAE

SAA1 and NET formation are elevated in MS patients

To assess translational relevance, we analyzed serum from MS patients. Plasma SAA1, the human ortholog of mouse Saa3, was higher than in healthy controls (Fig. 7A). Circulating nucleosome levels, which mark NET formation, were also higher (Fig. 7B). These findings match reports of neutrophil hyperactivation in MS [39, 41, 95]. Increased SAA1 and NET markers in MS patients mirror the Socs3ΔLy6G mouse phenotype. This links neutrophil-driven Saa3/SAA1 signaling to human CNS autoimmunity and points to therapeutic and diagnostic potential.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Enhanced SAA1 expression and NET formation in plasma of MS patients. (A) SAA1 protein expression was quantified by ELISA in plasma samples collected from MS patients and HC. (B) H3.1-nucleosome expression was quantified by ELISA in plasma samples collected from MS patients and HC

Discussion

Neutrophils are increasingly recognized as active regulators of neuroinflammation rather than passive bystanders. Here, we demonstrate that loss of Socs3 in neutrophils alone (Socs3ΔLy6G mice) drives a severe btEAE, which features cerebellar neutrophil infiltration, amplified inflammatory signaling, elevated ROS and NET formation, and extensive demyelination. Notably, depleting neutrophils completely prevented disease, establishing them as primary drivers of the brain-directed phenotype.

Single-cell transcriptomic analysis identified marked neutrophil heterogeneity within the CNS during EAE. We found five transcriptionally distinct clusters (Neu1–5) across naïve and diseased mice and observed expansion of the Neu2 and Neu4 clusters in Socs3ΔLy6G mice. The Neu4 cluster, which increased in both the SC and CB, showed enrichment for JAK/STAT and NF-κB signaling as well as interferon responses (IFNα, IFNγ). This transcriptional profile resembles interferon-stimulated neutrophil subsets previously observed in infection, autoimmunity, and chronic inflammation [89, 9699], pointing to a conserved inflammatory program engaged by Socs3 deficiency. The Neu2, Neu3 and Neu4 clusters were enriched in Cebpb and Junb expression, prominently expressed in activated neutrophils during inflammatory responses, consistent with the hyperactive phenotype of neutrophils elevated in the CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE.

To understand how the neutrophil compartment is organized and how its states relate to functional diversity, an integrated map of global neutrophil compartments in mice, referred to as NeuMap, was recently generated from the integration of scRNA-Seq data from various biological conditions, providing a transcriptional and functional map of neutrophil compartments across various organs and pathophysiological conditions [100]. This has revealed a distribution of seven functional hubs with distinct transcriptional signatures, illustrating the heterogeneity of neutrophil states in multiple studies [100]. Our Neu1 cluster expressed Cd52, resembling hub #3 (immuno-silent) while the Neu4 cluster expressed Ifit1 and Cd274 resembling hub #4 (IFN-response) (Supplementary Fig. 8), as described in NeuMap [100].

A neutrophil subset promoting CNS neuron survival and axon regeneration was recently described [48, 50]. We compared the gene signatures of our five Neu clusters with those of the neuro-regenerative neutrophil subset; none of the clusters expressed the alternative activation markers defining the neuro-regenerative subset. Together, these data support our conclusion that SOCS3 deficiency promotes an inflammatory, rather than neuro-regenerative, neutrophil state.

NETs contribute to the pathogenesis of MS [81]. NETs disrupt the BBB, promote leukocyte infiltration, and exacerbate demyelination [53, 101]. Consistent with this, cerebellar neutrophils from Socs3ΔLy6G mice released abundant NETs, accompanied by elevated expression of interferon-stimulated genes and chemokines such as Cxcl2 (Fig. 5A–B), both of which promote NET formation [102, 103]. We also identified elevated circulating nucleosomes in the plasma of MS patients compared with healthy controls (Fig. 7B), further supporting the translational relevance of NETs as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets.

A notable finding showed strong Saa3 activation in neutrophils from Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Figs. 5A–B and 6A), with expression also seen in microglia and macrophages (Supplemental Fig. 7G). Saa3 levels increased in SC and CB neutrophils from Socs3ΔLy6G mice compared with controls, indicating a role in brain targeting. Since Saa3 signals through TLR2 and TLR4, both of which are upregulated in Socs3ΔLy6G macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 7E), our data support a feed-forward inflammatory loop between neutrophils and myeloid cells. Saa3 was also expressed by macrophages and microglia in the CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Supplementary Fig. 7G). Thus, Saa3-mediated activation of TLR2 and TLR4 could occur through neutrophil-independent pathways such as an autocrine feedback loop in macrophages, amplifying neuroinflammatory pathways during EAE in Socs3ΔLy6G mice. Previous studies found that SAA-deficient mice develop delayed or milder EAE [104], highlighting the pathogenic role of this pathway. Similarly, plasma SAA1 levels were higher in MS patients than in controls (Fig. 7A), linking the murine Saa3 axis to human disease.

Mechanistically, SOCS3 negatively regulates both NF-κB [105, 106], and JAK/STAT3 signaling [20, 22, 107], which are known drivers of Saa3 expression [108112]. Therefore, loss of Socs3 removes these inhibitory controls, leading to persistent activation of these signaling pathways, upregulated Saa3 production, and amplification of inflammatory signals. SAA proteins, whose production is increased as a result, can cross and impair the intact BBB. Thus, the Socs3-deficient state promotes a mechanistic cascade from enhanced signaling and Saa3 production to disruption of the BBB and CNS pathology in MS.

Limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, our data showed significantly increased neutrophil frequencies in the spleen, skull BM and femur BM, indicating the potential contribution of local skull BM and/or peripheral reservoirs. How calvarial or vertebral marrow niches contribute to the infiltration of neutrophils to the CNS remains to be examined. Second, prior studies have reported neutrophil infiltration (MPO+ cells) and citH3+ NETosis in active MS lesions [113115], as well as neutrophil accumulation in the leptomeninges of a subset of patients with progressive MS exhibiting leptomeningeal inflammation and cortical subpial demyelination [116], supporting the relevance of our findings of neutrophil infiltration in the murine EAE model. Although we provided histological validation of neutrophil infiltration in the CB and SC, we acknowledge the absence of MS CNS histology as a limitation in our present study. Third, our data indicate that Saa3 primarily serves as an associated inflammatory marker in Socs3-deficient neutrophils. The causative mechanism of Saa3 as an important driver of inflammation in the btEAE model needs further investigation such as neutralization studies and/or genetic deletion.

Collectively, our findings designate neutrophils as active effectors of autoimmune neuroinflammation. Socs3 loss triggers neutrophil activation, ROS and NET release, and Saa3 upregulation, establishing a proinflammatory circuit that drives cerebellar demyelination. By resolving neutrophil heterogeneity and defining transcriptional programs in EAE, this study highlights the Saa3/SAA1 axis as a potential biomarker and target for modulating CNS autoimmunity.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants P50NS108675 (to ENB), AG075057 and AG081687 (to HQ), and HL150078 (to RSW) and a Mark Foundation Endeavor Award (to RSW). We thank the UAB Flow Cytometry & Single Cell Core Facility for assistance with the flow cytometry and scRNA-Seq experiments. The Core is supported by the Center for AIDS Research, NIH AI027767, and the O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, NIH CA013148.

Abbreviations

AD

Alzheimer’s Disease

BBB

Blood-brain Barrier

btEAE

Brain-targeted EAE

CB

Cerebellum

cEAE

Classical EAE

CNS

Central Nervous System

DEGs

Differentially Expressed Genes

EAE

Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

FDR

False Discovery Rate

GSEA

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

HC

Healthy Controls

ISG

Interferon-stimulated Gene

JAK

Janus Kinase

MS

Multiple Sclerosis

NES

Normalized Enrichment Score

NETs

Neutrophil Extracellular Traps

PCA

Principal Component Analysis

PD

Parkinson’s Disease

PTX

Pertussis Toxin

SAA

Serum Amyloid A

Saa3

Serum Amyloid A3

SC

Spinal Cord

scRNA-Seq

Single-cell RNA Sequencing

SOCS

Suppressors Of Cytokine Signaling

STAT

Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection

Authors’ contributions

Y.W., W.J.T., H.Q., R.S.W., and E.N.B. designed the experiments and wrote the main manuscript. W.R.M. and C.R. provide the human samples and patient information. Y.W., W.J.T., L.Z., Z.Y., S.B.P., W.Y., Z.L., J.A.B., G. M., and H.Q. performed the experiments and analyzed the data.

Funding

Declaration: Y.W., W.J.T., L.Z., Z.Y., W.Y., J.A.B, H.Q., and E.N.B. were supported by NIH grant P50NS108675. L.Z., G. M., H.Q., and E.N.B were supported by NIH grant AG075057. S.B.P. and R.S.W were supported by NIH R01HL150078 and Mark Foundation Endeavor Award.

Author Details, Including Country and City Affiliation: Y.W., W.J.T., L.Z., Z.Y., S.B.P., W.Y., J.A.B, G.M, H.Q.: 1918 University Blvd, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 35294; W.J.T.: EMD Serono, Inc., Billerica, MA, 01821; Z.Y.: Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, CA 94158; R.S.W: Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; W.Y.: Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, NY 10021; W.R.M: Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; C.R.: Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; E.N.B.: 701 19th Street South, ALGEN, Suite 835, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 35294.

Data availability

ScRNA-Seq data will be available online. The single-cell data have been deposited in the GEO under the accession number GSE304332. Raw files supporting our findings are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were performed according to all applicable laws and regulations on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes after receiving approval for the animal license (IACUC-09941) from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Hongwei Qin, Email: hqin@uab.edu.

Etty N. Benveniste, Email: tika@uab.edu

References

  • 1.Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF, Calabresi PA. Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:169–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2018;391:1622–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Attfield KE, Jensen LT, Kaufmann M, Friese MA, Fugger L. The immunology of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22:734–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jakimovski D, Bittner S, Zivadinov R, Morrow SA, Benedict RH, Zipp F, Weinstock-Guttman B. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2024;403:183–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hemmer B, Kerschensteiner M, Korn T. Role of the innate and adaptive immune responses in the course of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:406–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Robinson AP, Harp CT, Noronha A, Miller SD. The experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS: utility for understanding disease pathophysiology and treatment. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;122:173–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Manouchehri N, Salinas VH, Hussain RZ, Stuve O. Distinctive transcriptomic and epigenomic signatures of bone marrow-derived myeloid cells and microglia in CNS autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120:e2212696120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yan Z, Gibson SA, Buckley JA, Qin H, Benveniste EN. Role of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in regulation of innate immunity in neuroinflammatory diseases. Clin Immunol. 2018;189:4–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Morris R, Kershaw NJ, Babon JJ. The molecular details of cytokine signaling via the JAK/STAT pathway. Protein Sci. 2018;27:1984–2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jain M, Singh MK, Shyam H, Mishra A, Kumar S, Kumar A, Kushwaha J. Role of JAK/STAT in the neuroinflammation and its association with neurological disorders. Ann Neurosci. 2021;28:191–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hu Q, Bian Q, Rong D, Wang L, Song J, Huang HS, Zeng J, Mei J, Wang PY. JAK/STAT pathway: Extracellular signals, diseases, immunity, and therapeutic regimens. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1110765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Frisullo G, Angelucci F, Caggiula M, Nociti V, Iorio R, Patanella AK, Sancricca C, Mirabella M, Tonali PA, Batocchi AP. pSTAT1, pSTAT3, and T-bet expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients correlates with disease activity. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:1027–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Canto E, Isobe N, Didonna A, Group M-ES, Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR. Aberrant STAT phosphorylation signaling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee PW, Smith AJ, Yang Y, Selhorst AJ, Liu Y, Racke MK, Lovett-Racke AE. IL-23R-activated STAT3/STAT4 is essential for Th1/Th17-mediated CNS autoimmunity. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e91663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schneider A, Long SA, Cerosaletti K, Ni CT, Samuels P, Kita M, Buckner JH. In active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, effector T cell resistance to adaptive T(regs) involves IL-6-mediated signaling. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:170ra15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lu JQ, Power C, Blevins G, Giuliani F, Yong VW. The regulation of reactive changes around multiple sclerosis lesions by phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013;72:1135–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cianciulli A, Calvello R, Porro C, Trotta T, Panaro MA. Understanding the role of SOCS signaling in neurodegenerative diseases: Current and emerging concepts. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2017;37:67–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sobah ML, Liongue C, Ward AC. SOCS Proteins in Immunity, Inflammatory Diseases, and Immune-Related Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:727987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pandey R, Bakay M, Hakonarson H. SOCS-JAK-STAT inhibitors and SOCS mimetics as treatment options for autoimmune uveitis, psoriasis, lupus, and autoimmune encephalitis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1271102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lynch DM, Forrester B, Webb T, Ciulli A. Unravelling the druggability and immunological roles of the SOCS-family proteins. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1449397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Frisullo G, Mirabella M, Angelucci F, Caggiula M, Morosetti R, Sancricca C, Patanella AK, Nociti V, Iorio R, Bianco A, et al. The effect of disease activity on leptin, leptin receptor and suppressor of cytokine signalling-3 expression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;192:174–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Toghi M, Taheri M, Arsang-Jang S, Ohadi M, Mirfakhraie R, Mazdeh M, Sayad A. SOCS gene family expression profile in the blood of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Sci. 2017;375:481–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu Y, Holdbrooks AT, De Sarno P, Rowse AL, Yanagisawa LL, McFarland BC, Harrington LE, Raman C, Sabbaj S, Benveniste EN, Qin H. Therapeutic efficacy of suppressing the JAK/STAT pathway in multiple models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2014;192:59–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu Y, Holdbrooks AT, Meares GP, Buckley JA, Benveniste EN, Qin H. Preferential recruitment of neutrophils into the cerebellum and brainstem contributes to the atypical experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis phenotype. J Immunol. 2015;195:841–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qin H, Yeh W-I, De Sarno P, Holdbrooks AT, Liu Y, Muldowney MT, Reynolds SL, Yanagisawa LL, Fox THI, Park K, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3/suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (STAT3/SOCS3) axis in myeloid cells regulates neuroinflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:5004–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yan Z, Yang W, Parkitny L, Gibson SA, Lee KS, Collins F, Deshane JS, Cheng W, Weinmann AS, Wei H, et al. Deficiency of Socs3 leads to brain-targeted EAE via enhanced neutrophil activation and ROS production. JCI Insight. 2019;5:e126520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Simmons SB, Liggitt D, Goverman JM. Cytokine-regulated neutrophil recruitment is required for brain but not spinal cord inflammation during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2014;193:555–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pierson ER, Goverman JM. GM-CSF is not essential for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis but promotes brain-targeted disease. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e92362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.De Bondt M, Hellings N, Opdenakker G, Struyf S. Neutrophils: Underestimated players in the pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:4558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Woodberry T, Bouffler SE, Wilson AS, Buckland RL, Brustle A. The emerging role of neutrophil granulocytes in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Med. 2018;7:511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pierson ER, Wagner CA, Goverman JM. The contribution of neutrophils to CNS autoimmunity. Clin Immunol. 2018;189:23–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti CF. Comparative immunopathogenesis of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica, and multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20:343–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rumble JM, Huber AK, Krishnamoorthy G, Srinivasan A, Giles DA, Zhang X, Wang L, Segal BM. Neutrophil-related factors as biomarkers in EAE and MS. J Exp Med. 2015;212:23–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chakraborty S, Tabrizi Z, Bhatt NN, Franciosa SA, Bracko O. A Brief overview of neutrophils in neurological diseases. Biomolecules. 2023;13:743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Aries ML, Hensley-McBain T. Neutrophils as a potential therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1123149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zenaro E, Pietronigro E, Della Bianca V, Piacentino G, Marongiu L, Budui S, Turano E, Rossi B, Angiari S, Dusi S, et al. Neutrophils promote Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology and cognitive decline via LFA-1 integrin. Nat Med. 2015;21:880–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Munoz-Delgado L, Macias-Garcia D, Perinan MT, Jesus S, Adarmes-Gomez AD, Bonilla Toribio M, Buiza Rueda D, Jimenez-Jaraba MDV, Benitez Zamora B, Diaz Belloso R, et al. Peripheral inflammatory immune response differs among sporadic and familial Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2023;9:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang F, Chen B, Ren W, Yan Y, Zheng X, Jin S, Chang Y. Association analysis of dopaminergic degeneration and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in Parkinson’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2024;16:1377994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Naegele M, Tillack K, Reinhardt S, Schippling S, Martin R, Sospedra M. Neutrophils in multiple sclerosis are characterized by a primed phenotype. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;242:60–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hertwig L, Pache F, Romero-Suarez S, Sturner KH, Borisow N, Behrens J, Bellmann-Strobl J, Seeger B, Asselborn N, Ruprecht K, et al. Distinct functionality of neutrophils in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler. 2016;22:160–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tillack K, Naegele M, Haueis C, Schippling S, Wandinger KP, Martin R, Sospedra M. Gender differences in circulating levels of neutrophil extracellular traps in serum of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2013;261:108–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rossi B, Constantin G, Zenaro E. The emerging role of neutrophils in neurodegeneration. Immunobiol. 2020;225:151865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Khaw YM, Cunningham C, Tierney A, Sivaguru M, Inoue M. Neutrophil-selective deletion of Cxcr2 protects against CNS neurodegeneration in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Grist JJ, Marro BS, Skinner DD, Syage AR, Worne C, Doty DJ, Fujinami RS, Lane TE. Induced CNS expression of CXCL1 augments neurologic disease in a murine model of multiple sclerosis via enhanced neutrophil recruitment. Eur J Immunol. 2018;48:1199–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Skinner DD, Syage AR, Olivarria GM, Stone C, Hoglin B, Lane TE. Sustained infiltration of neutrophils into the CNS results in increased demyelination in a viral-induced model of multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:931388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shi K, Li H, Chang T, He W, Kong Y, Qi C, Li R, Huang H, Zhu Z, Zheng P, et al. Bone marrow hematopoiesis drives multiple sclerosis progression. Cell. 2022;185:2234–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Knier B, Hiltensperger M, Sie C, Aly L, Lepennetier G, Engleitner T, Garg G, Muschaweckh A, Mitsdorffer M, Koedel U, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells control B cell accumulation in the central nervous system during autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2018;19:1341–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sas AR, Carbajal KS, Jerome AD, Menon R, Yoon C, Kalinski AL, Giger RJ, Segal BM. A new neutrophil subset promotes CNS neuron survival and axon regeneration. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:1496–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jerome AD, Atkinson JR, McVey Moffatt AL, Sepeda JA, Segal BM, Sas AR. Characterization of Zymosan-modulated neutrophils with neuroregenerative properties. Front Immunol. 2022;13:912193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jerome AD, Sas AR, Wang Y, Hammond LA, Wen J, Atkinson JR, Webb A, Liu T, Segal BM. Cytokine polarized, alternatively activated bone marrow neutrophils drive axon regeneration. Nat Immunol. 2024;25:957–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ng LG, Ostuni R, Hidalgo A. Heterogeneity of neutrophils. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:255–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Quan M, Zhang H, Han X, Ba Y, Cui X, Bi Y, Yi L, Li B. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Transcriptional Landscape of Neutrophils and Highlights the Role of TREM-1 in EAE. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024;11:e200278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shen S, Wu S, Wang Y, Xiao L, Sun X, Sun W, Zhao Y, Li R, Zhang J, Wang Z, et al. Temporal dynamics of neutrophil functions in multiple sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis. 2024;203:106744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Croker BA, Krebs DL, Zhang J-G, Wormald S, Willson TA, Stanley EG, Robb L, Greenhalgh CJ, Förster I, Clausen BE, et al. SOCS3 negatively regulates IL-6 signaling in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:540–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hasenberg A, Hasenberg M, Mann L, Neumann F, Borkenstein L, Stecher M, Kraus A, Engel DR, Klingberg A, Seddigh P, et al. Catchup: a mouse model for imaging-based tracking and modulation of neutrophil granulocytes. Nat Methods. 2015;12:445–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tuck MK, Chan DW, Chia D, Godwin AK, Grizzle WE, Krueger KE, Rom W, Sanda M, Sorbara L, Stass S, et al. Standard operating procedures for serum and plasma collection: early detection research network consensus statement standard operating procedure integration working group. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:113–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gibson SA, Yang W, Yan Z, Liu Y, Rowse AL, Weinmann AS, Qin H, Benveniste EN. Protein kinase CK2 controls the fate between Th17 cell and regulatory T cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2017;198:4244–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liu L, Belkadi A, Darnall L, Hu T, Drescher C, Cotleur AC, Padovani-Claudio D, He T, Choi K, Lane TE, et al. CXCR2-positive neutrophils are essential for cuprizone-induced demyelination: relevance to multiple sclerosis. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:319–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhou L, Yan Z, Yang W, Buckley JA, Al Diffalha S, Benveniste EN, Qin H. Socs3 expression in myeloid cells modulates the pathogenesis of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1163987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Steinbach K, Piedavent M, Bauer S, Neumann JT, Friese MA. Neutrophils amplify autoimmune central nervous system infiltrates by maturing local APCs. J Immunol. 2013;191:4531–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Noubade R, Wong K, Ota N, Rutz S, Eidenschenk C, Valdez PA, Ding J, Peng I, Sebrell A, Caplazi P, et al. NRROS negatively regulates reactive oxygen species during host defence and autoimmunity. Nature. 2014;509:235–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gibson SA, Yang W, Yan Z, Qin H, Benveniste EN. CK2 controls Th17 and regulatory T cell differentiation through inhibition of FoxO1. J Immunol. 2018;201:383–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yang W, Gibson SA, Yan Z, Wei H, Tao J, Sha B, Qin H, Benveniste EN. Protein kinase 2 (CK2) controls CD4(+) T cell effector function in the pathogenesis of colitis. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13:788–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Qin H, Holdbrooks AT, Liu Y, Reynolds SL, Yanagisawa LL, Benveniste EN. SOCS3 deficiency promotes M1 macrophage polarization and inflammation. J Immunol. 2012;189:3439–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lawlor N, Nehar-Belaid D, Grassmann JDS, Stoeckius M, Smibert P, Stitzel ML, Pascual V, Banchereau J, Williams A, Ucar D. Single cell analysis of blood mononuclear cells stimulated through either LPS or anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. Front Immunol. 2021;12:636720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Goel P, Aryal S, Franceski AM, Kuznetsova V, Costa AFO, Luca F, Connelly AN, Phillips DW, Ennis CC, Curtiss BM, et al. The acute myeloid leukemia microenvironment impairs neutrophil maturation and function through NFkappaB signaling. Blood. 2025;146:1707–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hong H, Wang Y, Menard M, Buckley JA, Zhou L, Volpicelli-Daley L, Standaert DG, Qin H, Benveniste EN. Suppression of the JAK/STAT pathway inhibits neuroinflammation in the line 61-PFF mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2024;21:216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Eisenstein M. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis software providers scramble to offer solutions. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:254–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Andueza A, Kumar S, Kim J, Kang DW, Mumme HL, Perez JI, Villa-Roel N, Jo H. Endothelial reprogramming by disturbed flow revealed by single-cell RNA and chromatin accessibility study. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Luecken MD, Theis FJ. Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial. Mol Syst Biol. 2019;15:e8746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Heumos L, Schaar AC, Lance C, Litinetskaya A, Drost F, Zappia L, Lucken MD, Strobl DC, Henao J, Curion F, et al. Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities. Nat Rev Genet. 2023;24:550–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018;19:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Cao J, Spielmann M, Qiu X, Huang X, Ibrahim DM, Hill AJ, Zhang F, Mundlos S, Christiansen L, Steemers FJ, et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature. 2019;566:496–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15545–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:411–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Papalexi E, Satija R. Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:35–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Browaeys R, Saelens W, Saeys Y. NicheNet: modeling intercellular communication by linking ligands to target genes. Nat Methods. 2020;17:159–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Castanheira FVS, Kubes P. Neutrophils and NETs in modulating acute and chronic inflammation. Blood. 2019;133:2178–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Grayson PC, Kaplan MJ. At the Bench: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) highlight novel aspects of innate immune system involvement in autoimmune diseases. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;99:253–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Manda-Handzlik A, Demkow U. The brain entangled: The contribution of neutrophil extracellular traps to the diseases of the central nervous system. Cells. 2019;8:1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Quan M, Zhang H, Deng X, Liu H, Xu Y, Song X. Neutrophils, NETs and multiple sclerosis: a mini review. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1487814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wigerblad G, Kaplan MJ. Neutrophil extracellular traps in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23:274–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wargnies M, Rommelaere G, Candiracci J, Pamart D, Varsebroucq R, Jibassia F, Serneo F, Laloux V, Thiry O, Lambert F, et al. Quantification of H3.1-nucleosomes using a chemiluminescent immunoassay: A reliable method for neutrophil extracellular trap detection. PLoS ONE. 2025;20:e0329352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Herisson F, Frodermann V, Courties G, Rohde D, Sun Y, Vandoorne K, Wojtkiewicz GR, Masson GS, Vinegoni C, Kim J, et al. Direct vascular channels connect skull bone marrow and the brain surface enabling myeloid cell migration. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:1209–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Cugurra A, Mamuladze T, Rustenhoven J, Dykstra T, Beroshvili G, Greenberg ZJ, Baker W, Papadopoulos Z, Drieu A, Blackburn S, et al. Skull and vertebral bone marrow are myeloid cell reservoirs for the meninges and CNS parenchyma. Science. 2021;373:eabf7844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kolabas ZI, Kuemmerle LB, Perneczky R, Forstera B, Ulukaya S, Ali M, Kapoor S, Bartos LM, Buttner M, Caliskan OS, et al. Distinct molecular profiles of skull bone marrow in health and neurological disorders. Cell. 2023;186:3706–e37253729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhang H, Nguyen-Jackson H, Panopoulos AD, Li HS, Murray PJ, Watowich SS. STAT3 controls myeloid progenitor growth during emergency granulopoiesis. Blood. 2010;116:2462–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kwok AJ, Allcock A, Ferreira RC, Cano-Gamez E, Smee M, Burnham KL, Zurke YX, McKechnie S, Mentzer AJ, et al. Neutrophils and emergency granulopoiesis drive immune suppression and an extreme response endotype during sepsis. Nat Immunol. 2023;24:767–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Grieshaber-Bouyer R, Radtke FA, Cunin P, Stifano G, Levescot A, Vijaykumar B, Nelson-Maney N, Blaustein RB, Monach PA, Nigrovic PA, ImmGen C. The neutrotime transcriptional signature defines a single continuum of neutrophils across biological compartments. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sanada Y, Yamamoto T, Satake R, Yamashita A, Kanai S, Kato N, van de Loo FA, Nishimura F, Scherer PE, Yanaka N. Serum Amyloid A3 Gene Expression in Adipocytes is an Indicator of the Interaction with Macrophages. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hiratsuka S, Watanabe A, Sakurai Y, Akashi-Takamura S, Ishibashi S, Miyake K, Shibuya M, Akira S, Aburatani H, Maru Y. The S100A8-serum amyloid A3-TLR4 paracrine cascade establishes a pre-metastatic phase. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:1349–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhang G, Liu J, Wu L, Fan Y, Sun L, Qian F, Chen D, Ye RD. Elevated expression of serum amyloid A 3 protects colon epithelium against acute injury through TLR2-dependent induction of neutrophil IL-22 expression in a mouse model of colitis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lee JM, Kim EK, Seo H, Jeon I, Chae MJ, Park YJ, Song B, Kim YS, Kim YJ, Ko HJ, Kang CY. Serum amyloid A3 exacerbates cancer by enhancing the suppressive capacity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells via TLR2-dependent STAT3 activation. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44:1672–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Verstraelen P, Van Remoortel S, De Loose N, Verboven R, Garcia-Diaz Barriga G, Christmann A, Gries M, Bessho S, Li J, Guerra C, et al. Serum amyloid A3 fuels a feed-forward inflammatory response to the bacterial amyloid curli in the enteric nervous system. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;18:89–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ristori G, Laurenti F, Stacchini P, Gasperini C, Buttinelli C, Pozzilli C, Salvetti M. Serum amyloid A protein is elevated in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 1998;88:9–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Xie X, Shi Q, Wu P, Zhang X, Kambara H, Su J, Yu H, Park SY, Guo R, Ren Q, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals neutrophil heterogeneity in homeostasis and infection. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:1119–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Garrido-Trigo A, Corraliza AM, Veny M, Dotti I, Melon-Ardanaz E, Rill A, Crowell HL, Corbi A, Gudino V, Esteller M, et al. Macrophage and neutrophil heterogeneity at single-cell spatial resolution in human inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Commun. 2023;14:4506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Yao X, Redekar NR, Keeran KJ, Qu X, Jeffries KR, Soria-Florido MT, Saxena A, Dagur PK, Lin WC, McCoy JP, Levine SJ. Neutrophil heterogeneity is modified during acute lung inflammation in Apoa1-/- mice. J Immunol. 2024;213:456–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kapellos TS, Bassler K, Fujii W, Nalkurthi C, Schaar AC, Bonaguro L, Pecht T, Galvao I, Agrawal S, Saglam A, et al. Systemic alterations in neutrophils and their precursors in early-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cerezo-Wallis D, Rubio-Ponce A, Richter M, Pitino E, Kwok I, Marteletto G, Guanolema-Coba AC, Shih C, Huang RK, Moraga A, et al. Architecture of the neutrophil compartment. Nature. 2026;649:1003–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Nowaczewska-Kuchta A, Ksiazek-Winiarek D, Szpakowski P, Glabinski A. The Role of Neutrophils in Multiple Sclerosis and Ischemic Stroke. Brain Sci. 2024;14:423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Martinelli S, Urosevic M, Daryadel A, Oberholzer PA, Baumann C, Fey MF, Dummer R, Simon HU, Yousefi S. Induction of genes mediating interferon-dependent extracellular trap formation during neutrophil differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:44123–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Pylaeva E, Bordbari S, Spyra I, Decker AS, Haussler S, Vybornov V, Lang S, Jablonska J. Detrimental effect of type I IFNs during acute lung infection with pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated through the stimulation of neutrophil NETosis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Lee JY, Hall JA, Kroehling L, Wu L, Najar T, Nguyen HH, Lin WY, Yeung ST, Silva HM, Li D, et al. Serum amyloid A proteins induce pathogenic Th17 cells and promote inflammatory disease. Cell. 2020;180:79–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Chhabra JK, Chattopadhyay B, Paul BN. SOCS3 dictates the transition of divergent time-phased events in granulocyte TNF-alpha signaling. Cell Mol Immunol. 2014;11:105–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Sood V, Lata S, Ramachandran VG, Banerjea AC. Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 (SOCS3) degrades p65 and regulate HIV-1 replication. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Croker BA, Metcalf D, Robb L, Wei W, Mifsud S, DiRago L, Cluse LA, Sutherland KD, Hartley L, Williams E, et al. SOCS3 is a critical physiological negative regulator of G-CSF signaling and emergency granulopoiesis. Immunity. 2004;20:153–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Zhang C, Li Q, Xu Q, Dong W, Li C, Deng B, Gong J, Zhang LZ, Jin J. Pulmonary interleukin 1 beta/serum amyloid A3 axis promotes lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by facilitating the pre-metastatic niche formation. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42:166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Son DS, Roby KF, Terranova PF. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces serum amyloid A3 in mouse granulosa cells. Endocrinology. 2004;145:2245–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Tannock LR, De Beer MC, Ji A, Shridas P, Noffsinger VP, den Hartigh L, Chait A, De Beer FC, Webb NR. Serum amyloid A3 is a high density lipoprotein-associated acute-phase protein. J Lipid Res. 2018;59:339–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Mohanty T, Milicevic K, Gothert H, Tillmann A, Padra M, Papareddy P, Herwald H. Balancing inflammation: the specific roles of serum amyloid A proteins in sterile and infectious diseases. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1544085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Fasshauer M, Klein J, Kralisch S, Klier M, Lossner U, Bluher M, Paschke R. Serum amyloid A3 expression is stimulated by dexamethasone and interleukin-6 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Endocrinol. 2004;183:561–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Nagra RM, Becher B, Tourtellotte WW, Antel JP, Gold D, Paladino T, Smith RA, Nelson JR, Reynolds WF. Immunohistochemical and genetic evidence of myeloperoxidase involvement in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 1997;78:97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lock C, Hermans G, Pedotti R, Brendolan A, Schadt E, Garren H, Langer-Gould A, Strober S, Cannella B, Allard J, et al. Gene-microarray analysis of multiple sclerosis lesions yields new targets validated in autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat Med. 2002;8:500–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Mastronardi FG, Wood DD, Mei J, Raijmakers R, Tseveleki V, Dosch HM, Probert L, Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Moscarello MA. Increased citrullination of histone H3 in multiple sclerosis brain and animal models of demyelination: a role for tumor necrosis factor-induced peptidylarginine deiminase 4 translocation. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11387–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Zuo M, Fettig NM, Bernier LP, Possnecker E, Spring S, Pu A, Ma XI, Lee DS, Ward LA, Sharma A, et al. Age-dependent gray matter demyelination is associated with leptomeningeal neutrophil accumulation. JCI Insight. 2022;7:e158144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ScRNA-Seq data will be available online. The single-cell data have been deposited in the GEO under the accession number GSE304332. Raw files supporting our findings are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Neuroinflammation are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES