Abstract
Recently, the use of timeout rooms has been questioned by various agencies, and some have adopted policies that prohibit or greatly restrict exclusionary timeout. The present study developed a timeout procedure that did not require removal of the misbehaver from the learning environment. The procedure was applied to the disruptive behaviors of five severely retarded children in an institutional special-education classroom. An observer prompted all teacher behaviors related to the procedures to assure their precise implementation. After baseline, a reinforcement-only condition was implemented. Each child was given a different colored ribbon to wear as a tie and received edibles and praise every few minutes for good behavior and for wearing the ribbon. When timeout was added, a child's ribbon was removed for any instance of misbehavior and teacher attention and participation in activities ceased for three minutes or until the misbehavior stopped. Reinforcement continued at other times for appropriate behavior. An ABCBC reversal design was used to demonstrate control of the behavior by the conditions applied. On average, the children misbehaved 42% and 32% of the time during the baseline and reinforcement conditions respectively but only 6% of the time during the timeout conditions. A followup probe during the new school year revealed that the teacher was able to conduct the procedure independently and that the children's disruptive behaviors were maintained at low levels. The practicality and acceptability of the procedure were supported further by the successful implementation of the procedure by a teacher in another state and by responses to a questionnaire given to 40 mental health professionals. The ribbon procedure appears to be a viable form of timeout, provided that disruptive behaviors during timeout can be tolerated within the setting, or a backup procedure such as exclusionary timeout can be tolerated within the setting, or a backup procedure such as exclusionary timeout is available when needed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Clark H. B., Rowbury T., Baer A. M., Baer D. M. Timeout as a punishing stimulus in continuous and intermittent schedules. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Fall;6(3):443–455. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drabman R., Spitalnik R. Social isolation as a punishment procedure: a controlled study. J Exp Child Psychol. 1973 Oct;16(2):236–249. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(73)90164-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foxx R. M. The use of overcorrection to eliminate the public disrobing (stripping) of retarded women. Behav Res Ther. 1976;14(1):53–61. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(76)90044-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Husted J. R., Hall P., Agin B. The effectiveness of time-out in reducing maladaptive behavior of autistic and retarded children. J Psychol. 1971 Nov;79(2D):189–196. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1971.9921310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Leary K. D., Kaufman K. F., Kass R. E., Drabman R. S. The effects of loud and soft reprimands on the behavior of disruptive students. Except Child. 1970 Oct;37(2):145–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'leary K. D., Becker W. C., Evans M. B., Saudargas R. A. A token reinforcement program in a public school: a replication and systematic analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Spring;2(1):3–13. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porterfield J. K., Herbert-Jackson E., Risley T. R. Contingent observation: an effective and acceptable procedure for reducing disruptive behavior of young children in a group setting. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Spring;9(1):55–64. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramp E., Ulrich R., Dulaney S. Delayed timeout as a procedure for reducing disruptive classroom behavior: a case study. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Fall;4(3):235–239. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sajwaj T. E., Pinkston S., Cordua G., Jackson C. Adverse effects of differential parental attention. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):15–30. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyler V. O., Jr, Brown D. The use of swift, brief isolation as a group control device for institutionalized delinquents. Behav Res Ther. 1967 Feb;5(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(67)90050-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vukelich R., Hake D. F. Reduction of dangerously aggressive behavior in a severely retarded resident through a combination of positive reinforcement procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Fall;4(3):215–225. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]