Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1978 Winter;11(4):465–473. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-465

Finders, keepers?: an analysis and validation of a free-found-ad policy

Richard S Goldstein 1,1, Bonnie L Minkin 1, Neil Minkin 1, Donald M Baer 1
PMCID: PMC1311330  PMID: 16795598

Abstract

A survey of Lost and Found classified sections in metropolitan and smaller newspapers revealed disparate rates between Lost ads and Found ads: Lost ads greatly outnumbered Found ads, probably because newspapers usually require the finders of lost personal property to pay for Found advertisements. The effect of a Free-Found-Ad policy on the rate of Found advertisements placed in the Lost and Found sections of three community newspapers was investigated using a multiple-baseline design. The results suggested that the Free-Found-Ad policy was effective in increasing the rates of Found ads in all three newspapers. To determine whether increases in Found ads resulted in increases in recovered property, a sample of individuals who placed Found ads were surveyed in both baseline and treatment conditions and asked if the found items had been claimed by their owners. The Free-Found-Ad policy appeared to be effective in increasing the amount of personal property returned. The study concluded that community newspapers can provide incentives to increase such help-giving or altruistic behaviors. The implications of this study for a general policy-research strategy are discussed.

Keywords: altruism, newspapers, response cost, policy-research strategy, multiple baseline

Full text

PDF
465

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boren J. J. An experimental social relation between two monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Nov;9(6):691–700. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryan J. H., Test M. A. Models and helping: naturalistic studies in aiding behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1967 Aug;6(4):400–407. doi: 10.1037/h0024826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schnelle J. F., Kirchner R. E., Macrae J. W., McNees M. P., Eck R. H., Snodgrass S., Casey J. D., Uselton P. H. Police evaluation research: an experimental and cost-benefit analysis of a helicopter patrol in a high crime area. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Spring;11(1):11–21. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schnelle J. F., Kirchner R. E., McNees M. P., Lawler J. M. Social evaluation research: the evaluation of two police patrolling strategies. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Winter;8(4):353–365. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stokes T. F., Fawcett S. B. Evaluating municipal policy: an analysis of a refuse packaging program. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Fall;10(3):391–398. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES