Abstract
Background: Etiologies of neural tube defects (NTDs) are multifactorial. Genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors may contribute to their reported variation in prevalence across the globe. Ethiopia has among the highest reported NTD prevalence globally, making investigation of genetic determinants in this high-risk population particularly important for advancing the understanding of NTD etiology. Genes involved in folate metabolism, such as the reduced folate carrier 1 (RFC1), have been investigated for the potential associations with NTDs, but findings throughout the literature remain inconsistent and inconclusive. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine an association of RFC-1 polymorphism at rs1131596 and rs1051266 loci (functional variants previously implicated in folate transport efficiency and NTD susceptibility) among mothers with the occurrence of NTDs in their offspring in Ethiopia. Methods: A case–control study involving 250 mothers (187 controls and 63 cases) of children with or without NTDs was conducted in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from April 2022, to September 2024. A total of 250 maternal whole blood samples were systematically collected and subjected to genetic analysis at loci rs1131596 and rs1051266 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing. Results: Detection of heterozygous (TC) and homozygous (CC) genotypes for SNP rs1131596 (−43T>C) in the RFC1 gene was 27.2%, with heterozygous (TC) comprising 10.4% and homozygous (CC) 16.8%. In contrast, for the rs1051266 (80A>G), the prevalence of the AG polymorphism was 28% while the GG polymorphism was 16.4%, resulting in a cumulative prevalence of 44.4%. The presence of maternal RFC-1 polymorphism at these two locations were not associated with significantly (p = 0.601 & p = 0.225 respectively) higher odds for NTD births. Conclusions: This study did not reveal significant association between maternal RFC1 gene polymorphisms and NTD-affected births. Comprehensive whole-genome sequencing of affected off-spring is essential to identify specific mutations or polymorphisms that may individually or collaboratively affect the risk of NTDs in the Ethiopian context.
Keywords: single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), neural tube defects (NTD), RFC1 gene
1. Introduction
Neural tube defects (NTDs) are structural defects of the central nervous system that affect the brain and spinal column during the first month after conception. NTDs occur due to the partial or complete failure of neural tube closure [1,2]. Ranging from mild to severe symptoms, the three main defects (anencephaly, encephalocele, and spina bifida) pose significant challenges. While anencephaly is typically associated with early mortality, individuals with spina bifida can survive with appropriate medical care, even though they often face substantial disability and limited life expectancy [3]. NTDs rank as the second most prevalent birth defect following congenital heart defects worldwide [4].
The global prevalence of neural tube defects is estimated at 18.6/10,000 (uncertainty interval: 15.3–23.0) live births, where approximately 75% of cases result in under-five mortality. An estimate of two cases per 1000 births would annually approximate 214,000–322,000 affected pregnancies worldwide [5].
Most of the mortality burden of NTDs is in low- and middle-income countries like Ethiopia. NTDs occur at a markedly higher rate in North Ethiopia compared to the global norm, with an estimated 131 affected infants per 10,000 births [6], in contrast to the worldwide average of 18.6 per 10,000 [5]. A recent study underscores the severity of the issue in Ethiopia, revealing the country’s high adjusted mortality fraction (7.5%) and adjusted mortality rate (104.0 per 10,000 births) attributed to NTDs if compared to South-East Asia (13.1 per 10,000 births) and other Sub-Saharan countries (14.2 per 10,000 births) [7]. Despite these alarming statistics, there is a significant gap in our understanding of the potential genetic risk factors associated with the occurrence of births affected with NTDs.
The etiology of NTDs is multifactorial, involving an interplay of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental determinants. Genetic contributions are estimated to account for up to 70% of the observed variance in NTD prevalence, highlighting their predominant role in disease susceptibility [8]. Among the genetic factors, genes involved in folate metabolism namely Reduced Folate Carrier 1 (RFC1) and Methyl Tetrahydro Folate Reductase (MTHFR) have been primarily indicated to have associations with births affected with NTDs with varying degrees of supportive evidence [9,10,11].
Case-control studies have found no significant association between the common RFC1 A80G (rs1051266) polymorphism and NTD risk, suggesting that RFC1 may not be a major determinant in folate-related NTD etiology across different populations [12,13]. In contrast, other investigations, particularly in populations with suboptimal folate status, have indicated a potential modest risk elevation linked to the G allele, possibly due to altered folate transport efficiency that impairs cellular folate availability during early embryogenesis [13,14].
The RFC1 gene encodes a transmembrane protein crucial for transporting folate, which is essential for intracellular folate levels and normal cellular metabolism. Folate is a key precursor in purine and pyrimidine synthesis, necessary for DNA replication, repair, and methylation [14,15]. Variants like the A80G polymorphism in RFC1 gene can reduce folate transport efficiency, leading to impaired nucleotide synthesis, disrupted methylation, and genomic instability. These effects are particularly critical during embryogenesis, increasing the risk of NTDs and other developmental abnormalities. Elevated homocysteine levels due to impaired folate metabolism may further contribute to oxidative stress and complications [13].
The importance of RFC1 extends beyond metabolic pathways. The absorption of folate and its cellular uptake, facilitated by the RFC1 gene encodes a cell surface transmembrane protein that facilitates the bidirectional movement of folate across cell membranes [12,16].
RFC1 gene polymorphisms have been associated with several disease conditions including congenital anomalies like NTDs, ventricular septal defects (VSD), autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) [13], congenital heart disease (CHD) and orofacial defects [14]. The rs1131596 and rs1051266 SNPs within the RFC1 gene have received attention due to their potential influence on RFC1 function and one-carbon metabolism [12,13]. However, a conclusive understanding of the impact of these particular polymorphisms on NTD susceptibility remains elusive. In this study, we aimed to assess the contribution of RFC1 polymorphisms at rs1131596 and rs1051266 in relation to the occurrence of NTDs within an Ethiopian population.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Setting
A hospital-based case–control study was conducted in two purposely selected hospitals (Zewditu Memorial Hospital and St. Peter’s Specialized Hospital) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. These two hospitals are among the leading referral hospitals in Addis Ababa with specialized pediatric neurosurgery departments. Infants and children affected by neural tube defects are referred to these centers from Addis Ababa and surrounding regions across Ethiopia. The study period was from April 2022 to September 2024.
Cases were defined as mothers of offspring affected by neural tube defects (NTDs), including major phenotypes such as spina bifida, anencephaly, and encephalocele, in accordance with standard classifications by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Hydrocephalus was not considered a primary NTD phenotype; however, cases of hydrocephalus secondary to NTDs (e.g., spina bifida with hydrocephalus) were included under the corresponding primary NTD diagnosis. Cases with ambiguous diagnoses, isolated hydrocephalus, hydrocephalus of non-NTD etiology, or multiple/non-NTD congenital anomalies were excluded.
2.2. Data Collection
Data collection for this study was done by trained General Practitioners (GPs) and nurses using a pretested questionnaire for comprehensive information gathering. These healthcare professionals interviewed mothers designated as cases and reviewed their medical records to confirm the diagnosis of NTDs. The absence of NTD anomalies was also explored in the control mothers’, i.e., mothers having normal children and visiting the hospitals for immunization or circumcision.
In parallel, whole blood samples from the mothers were collected by senior laboratory technicians following specialized training designed to ensure the consistency of sample collection. The data collectors utilized the Open Data Kit (ODKv.2023.1; (University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA), which was installed on encrypted tablets for conducting interviews and recording responses. This approach was implemented to prioritize data integrity, privacy and security.
Participants were recruited using a consecutive sampling approach during the defined data collection period. All eligible mothers who attended the selected hospitals and met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in the study until the end of the recruitment period. This approach allowed the inclusion of all available cases of mothers with NTD affected children presenting to the study sites, along with controls recruited from the same hospitals.
2.3. Ethical Approval and Consent for Research Participation
Ethical clearance was obtained from the National Research Ethics Review Board under the Ministry of Education, Ethiopia (IRB 17/246/818/22, 27 October 2022), from Addis Ababa University (IRB/02/14/2021, 28 September 2021) and from Oklahoma State University (IRB-24-234, 5 August 2024).
Participants were provided with an electronic information sheet and informed consent form using the ODK tool. Only individuals who willingly agreed to participate and formally signed the consent form were included in the research. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
2.4. Blood Collection for Genetic Analysis
Whole blood samples (3 mL) were systematically collected from mothers having infants and children affected with NTDs and from a control group of mothers with unaffected infants and children and stored in EDTA tubes. These blood samples were stored under −80 degrees in an EPHI laboratory until shipped to Oklahoma State University in the United States for genetic analysis. A total of 250 maternal samples were analyzed by PCR and DNA sequencing was done for RFC1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs1131596 and rs1051266.
2.5. DNA Extraction and Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from 50 µL of whole blood using the HighPrepTM Blood & Tissue DNA Kit (MagBio Genomics, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was stored at −20 °C until used for PCR. Genomic DNA was amplified by PCR using primers (5′-gtgaagttcttgtcgggccccaggaggtag-3′ and 5′-gcccagcagtgccatgagtctagtg-3′) designed by Primer3 software (version 4.1.0; Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA) [17] and GoTaq Green polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation at 95 degrees for 2 min, then 35 cycles at 95 degrees for 30 s and annealing and extension at 68 degrees for 1 min (step 3), and a final extension at 72 degrees for 5 min. Samples were sequenced by Eurofins Genomics (Louisville, KY, USA) and chromatograms were viewed individually for RFC1 SNPs rs1131596 and rs1051266, using methods similar to those published by our laboratory previously [18].
The selected SNPs (rs1051266 and rs1131596) in the RFC1 gene were chosen based on their reported functional relevance and prior evidence of association with folate metabolism and neural tube defects. In particular, the rs1051266 (80A>G) is a well-characterized functional polymorphism that may influence folate transport efficiency, while rs1131596 (−43T>C) has been investigated in previous association studies and may have regulatory significance [12,13,14].2.6. Statistical Analysis
Genotype and allele frequencies were calculated for both SNPs (rs1131596 and rs1051266), and HWE was assessed to evaluate genotype distribution within the study population. Minor allele frequency (MAF) was computed and compared with African population MAF data reported in the ALFA Allele Frequency Aggregator from the NCBI database [19,20]. Genotype distributions for each SNP were assessed for conformity with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control group using the chi-square test.
Associations between maternal genotypes and the risk of NTD-affected births were assessed using logistic regression. Regressions were applied under an additive genetic model, treating the number of minor alleles as a continuous predictor, and a recessive genetic model, comparing individuals homozygous for the minor allele with all others. Logistic regression analyses were conducted without adjustment for covariates to assess the direct relationship between genotype and outcome. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm that baseline characteristics did not act as confounding factors. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with statistical significance set at p-value less than 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Participants’ Characteristics
The study enrolled 250 mothers with a case-to-control ratio of one-to-three. All cases were mothers of children diagnosed with spina bifida, a major phenotype of neural tube defects. Among these, 55.6% had spina bifida without hydrocephalus, while 44.4% had spina bifida with associated hydrocephalus (spina bifida with hydrocephalus). No cases of isolated (non-NTD-associated) hydrocephalus were included in the analysis. Among all participants 82.4% were in the age group of 20–34 years whereas 16% were beyond 35 years of age. The proportion of the mothers at the age of 35 and above constituted 17.5% of cases and 15.5% of controls (Table 1).
Table 1.
Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers with (cases) and without (controls) a prior NTD birth.
| Characteristics | Cases (n = 63) | Controls (n = 187) | Total (n = 250) | χ2 | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (years) | 1.34 | 0.935 | |||
| 16–20 | 1 (1.6%) | 3 (1.6%) | 4 (1.6%) | ||
| 20–34 | 51 (81.0%) | 155 (82.9%) | 206 (82.4%) | ||
| 35–45 | 11 (17.5%) | 29 (15.5%) | 40 (16.0%) | ||
| Residence | 12.40 | <0.001 | |||
| Urban | 51 (81.0%) | 178 (95.2%) | 229 (91.6%) | ||
| Rural | 12 (19.0%) | 9 (4.8%) | 21 (8.4%) | ||
| Marital status | 1.33 | 0.249 | |||
| Unmarried | 2 (3.2%) | 2 (1.1%) | 4 (1.6%) | ||
| Married | 61 (96.8%) | 185 (98.9%) | 246 (98.4%) | ||
| Educational status | 5.53 | 0.137 | |||
| No formal education | 7 (11.1%) | 13 (7.0%) | 20 (8.0%) | ||
| Primary school | 23 (36.5%) | 70 (37.4%) | 93 (37.2%) | ||
| Secondary school | 30 (47.6%) | 76 (40.6%) | 106 (42.4%) | ||
| Higher education and above | 3 (4.8%) | 28 (15.0%) | 31 (12.4%) | ||
| Occupation | 47.41 | <0.001 | |||
| Housewife | 62 (98.4%) | 93 (49.7%) | 155 (62.0%) | ||
| Employed/business | 1 (1.6%) | 94 (50.3%) | 95 (38.0%) | ||
| Monthly income | 26.70 | <0.001 | |||
| Low | 40 (63.5%) | 51 (27.3%) | 91 (36.4%) | ||
| Lower-middle | 23 (36.5%) | 136 (72.7%) | 159 (63.6%) | ||
| Religion | 4.52 | 0.341 | |||
| Orthodox | 48 (76.2%) | 136 (72.7%) | 184 (73.6%) | ||
| Muslim | 13 (20.6%) | 29 (15.5%) | 42 (16.8%) | ||
| Protestant | 2 (3.2%) | 20 (10.7%) | 22 (8.8%) | ||
| Number of children | 1.21 | 0.750 | |||
| One | 35 (55.6%) | 114 (61.0%) | 149 (59.6%) | ||
| Two | 24 (38.1%) | 58 (31.0%) | 82 (32.8%) | ||
| ≥Three | 4 (6.4%) | 15 (8.0%) | 19 (7.6%) |
Among the study participants, 91.6% of the mothers were living in urban areas and 8.4% were from rural areas. Most of the participants were literate; 54.8% had completed high school and higher education and only 8% had no formal education. Nearly two thirds (62%) of the women were housewives.
3.2. Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) Analysis of RFC1 Polymorphisms
The genotype distributions of the two RFC1 polymorphisms were assessed for compliance with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in both case and control groups (Table 2). For rs1131596 (−43T>C), significant deviation from HWE was observed in both cases (χ2 = 25.39, p < 0.001) and controls (χ2 = 61.82, p < 0.001). Similarly, for rs1051266 (80A>G), the control group showed significant deviation from HWE (χ2 = 18.74, p < 0.001), whereas the case group did not deviate significantly (χ2 = 1.64, p = 0.127).
Table 2.
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium analysis of RFC1 SNPs among case and control mothers.
| SNP | Genotype | Cases (n = 63) Observed |
Expected | Controls (n = 187) Observed |
Expected | χ2 (Case) | χ2 (Control) |
p-Value (Case) |
p-Value (Control) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1131596 (−43T>C) |
TT | 48 (76.2%) | 42.36 | 134 (71.6%) | 108.01 | 0.75 | 6.25 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| TC | 7 (11.1%) | 18.59 | 19 (10.2%) | 68.21 | 7.23 | 35.50 | |||
| CC | 8 (12.7%) | 2.04 | 34 (18.2%) | 10.77 | 17.41 | 20.07 | |||
| Total χ2 | 25.39 | 61.82 | |||||||
| rs1051266 (80A>G) |
AA | 36 (57.1%) | 33.58 | 103 (55.1%) | 87.62 | 0.18 | 2.55 | 0.127 | <0.001 |
| AG | 20 (31.7%) | 24.82 | 50 (26.7%) | 80.76 | 0.94 | 11.06 | |||
| GG | 7 (11.1%) | 4.60 | 34 (18.2%) | 18.62 | 0.52 | 3.96 | |||
| Total χ2 | 1.64 | 18.74 |
Overall, the observed genotype frequencies differed from those expected under HWE, particularly in the control group for both polymorphisms. These findings suggest potential influences such as population substructure or sampling variation, which should be considered when interpreting the genetic association results.
3.3. Comparison of RFC1 Allele Frequencies in Ethiopian and African Reference Populations
The allelic distribution of the selected RFC1 polymorphisms among the study participants and their comparison with the broader African population averages are summarized in Table 3. For the rs1131596 (−43T>C) variant, the frequency of the reference (G) allele was notably higher in the Ethiopian cohort compared to the ALFA African average (0.719). Specifically, women with prior NTD births (cases) exhibited a mean allele frequency (MAF) of 0.818, while control women showed a MAF of 0.767.
Table 3.
Allele frequency of selected RFC1 SNPs of the Ethiopian mothers compared to the average for the African population according to Allele Frequency Aggregator (ALFA).
| SNP | Population | Group | Reference Allele | Alternate Allele |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1131596 (−43T>C) |
Ethiopia (n = 250) | Cases | G = 0.818 | A = 0.182 |
| Controls | G = 0.767 | A = 0.232 | ||
| Africa (n = 1322) | — | G = 0.719 | A = 0.280 | |
| rs1051266 (80A>G) |
Ethiopia (n = 250) | Cases | T = 0.762 | C = 0.238 |
| Controls | T = 0.685 | C = 0.315 | ||
| Africa (n = 1322) | — | T = 0.673 | C = 0.327 |
Conversely, the alternate (A) allele frequency in the Ethiopian cases (0.182) and controls (0.232) was lower than the reported 1000 Genomes/ALFA African frequency of 0.280. Similarly, for the rs1051266 (80A>G) variant, the alternate (C) allele frequency in Ethiopian cases (0.238) was lower than both the Ethiopian controls (0.315) and the African reference population (0.327) [19,20].
3.4. RFC1 Gene Polymorphism (rs1131596 & rs1051266) Using the Additive Genetic Model
As shown in Table 4, under an additive genetic model, maternal RFC1 polymorphisms were not significantly associated with NTD-affected births. For rs1131596, neither the heterozygous (TC) nor homozygous variant (CC) genotype showed a significant association compared to the TT reference genotype (TC: OR = 1.029, p = 0.953; CC: OR = 0.657, p = 0.325).
Table 4.
Distribution of rs1131596 & rs1051266 genotypes and alleles among women with and without a prior NTD birth using additive model.
| SNP/Genotype | Total (n = 250) | Cases (n = 63) | Controls (n = 187) | p-Value | OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1131596 (−43T>C) | ||||||
| TT (Reference) | 182 (72.8%) | 48 (76.2%) | 134 (71.7%) | 0.605 | — | — |
| TC | 26 (10.4%) | 7 (11.1%) | 19 (10.2%) | 0.953 | 1.029 | 0.407–2.599 |
| CC (Alternate) | 42 (16.8%) | 8 (12.7%) | 34 (18.2%) | 0.325 | 0.657 | 0.284–1.518 |
| C allele | 110 (22.0%) | 23 (18.2%) | 87 (23.2%) | — | — | — |
| T allele | 390 (78.0%) | 103 (81.8%) | 287 (76.7%) | — | — | — |
| rs1051266 (80A>G) | ||||||
| AA (Reference) | 139 (55.6%) | 36 (57.1%) | 103 (55.1%) | 0.425 | — | — |
| AG | 70 (28.0%) | 20 (31.7%) | 50 (26.7%) | 0.681 | 1.144 | 0.602–2.176 |
| GG (Alternate) | 41 (16.4%) | 7 (11.1%) | 34 (18.2%) | 0.248 | 0.589 | 0.240–1.445 |
| A allele | 313 (72.8%) | 94 (76.2%) | 256 (68.5%) | — | — | — |
| G allele | 117 (27.2%) | 34 (23.8%) | 118 (31.5%) | — | — | — |
Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) represent crude associations between genotype categories and NTD outcome.
Similarly, for rs1051266, no statistically significant association was observed for either the AG genotype (OR = 1.144, p = 0.681) or the GG genotype (OR = 0.589, p = 0.248) compared to the AA reference group. Overall, no significant differences were observed in genotype distribution between mothers with and without a prior NTD-affected birth.
3.5. RFC1 Gene Polymorphism (rs1131596 & rs1051266) Using the Recessive Genetic Model
We investigated the role of rs1131596 & rs1051266 in RFC1 gene further using a recessive genetic model, where mothers of homozygous carriers of the variant allele were compared with other genotypes combined (heterozygous and homozygous wild-type) to assess the potential association with the occurrence of NTD affected births.
For rs1131596 (−43T>C), the proportion of mothers with the homozygous variant genotype (CC) was lower among cases (12.7%) compared to controls (18.2%). Under the recessive model (CC versus TT + TC), logistic regression analysis showed lower odds of NTD occurrence among CC carriers, although this association was not statistically significant (OR = 0.654, 95% CI: 0.284–1.498, p = 0.317) as shown in Table 5.
Table 5.
Genotypes and Alleles for selected SNPs of RFC1 variant (rs1131596 & rs1051266) among women with and without a prior NTD birth using recessive model.
| Genotype (Recessive Model) |
Total (n = 250) | Cases (n = 63) | Controls (n = 187) | p-Value | OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1131596 (−43T>C) | ||||||
| CC (Alternate) | 42 (16.8%) | 8 (12.7%) | 34 (18.2%) | 0.317 | 0.654 | 0.284–1.498 |
| TT + TC | 208 (83.2%) | 55 (87.3%) | 153 (81.9%) | — | — | — |
| rs1051266 (80A>G) | ||||||
| GG (Alternate) | 41 (16.4%) | 7 (11.1%) | 34 (18.2%) | 0.194 | 0.563 | 0.236–1.340 |
| AG + AA | 209 (83.6%) | 56 (88.8%) | 153 (81.8%) | — | — |
Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) represent crude associations between genotype categories and NTD outcome.
Similarly, for rs1051266 (80A>G), the frequency of the homozygous variant genotype (GG) was also lower among cases (11.1%) compared to controls (18.2%). The recessive model analysis (GG versus AA + AG) indicated reduced odds of NTD occurrence among GG carriers, but again this finding did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.563, 95% CI: 0.236–1.340, p = 0.194).
Overall, the recessive model analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant association between maternal homozygosity for the variant alleles of either SNPs and NTD-affected births.
3.6. Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age and educational status (Table 6). Under the recessive genetic model, the adjusted estimates remained consistent with the unadjusted results for both RFC1 polymorphisms.
Table 6.
Sensitivity Analysis of RFC1 Polymorphisms (Recessive Model).
| SNP | Model | OR | 95% CI | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1131596 (−43T>C) | ||||
| CC vs. (TT + TC) | Unadjusted | 0.654 | 0.284–1.498 | 0.317 |
| Adjusted * | 1.333 | 0.543–3.267 | 0.530 | |
| rs1051266 (80A>G) | ||||
| GG vs. (AG + AA) | Unadjusted | 0.563 | 0.236–1.340 | 0.194 |
| Adjusted * | 1.256 | 0.470–3.358 | 0.649 |
* Adjusted for maternal age and educational status.
For rs1131596, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for the CC genotype compared to TT + TC was 1.33 (95% CI: 0.54–3.27; p = 0.530), compared to an unadjusted OR of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.28–1.50; p = 0.317).
Similarly, for rs1051266, the adjusted odds ratio for the GG genotype compared to AG + AA was 1.26 (95% CI: 0.47–3.36; p = 0.649), compared to an unadjusted OR of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.24–1.34; p = 0.194).
Although slight changes in the magnitude and direction of the odds ratios were observed after adjustment, none of the associations reached statistical significance. These findings indicate that the results are robust and not materially influenced by the assessed confounding variables.
4. Discussion
In the present study, the association of RFC1 polymorphism (rs1131596 and rs1051266) was assessed in mothers who had prior NTD births and those with no prior NTDs births. The association of these polymorphisms with socio-demographic, clinical and nutritional risk factors was assessed. We found no statistically significant association between maternal RFC1 rs1131596 and rs1051266 polymorphisms and NTD-affected births, consistent with findings reported by some studies in the literature [21,22,23,24,25,26].
Nonetheless, this study provides important genetic data from Ethiopia, a population with one of the highest reported neural tube defect burdens globally and where genetic studies of folate metabolism pathways remain scarce.
We originally hypothesized that genetic variation in either of these two RFC1 polymorphisms would be associated with a greater risk of offspring NTDs. However, no significant association between these two polymorphisms in the mother and NTDs in the infant were found. The rs1051266 variant is the most studied RFC1 polymorphism. It has been associated with an increased risk of NTDs in some populations, although results vary across populations and studies [21,23,24].
A comprehensive meta-analysis by Zhang and colleagues [24], which evaluated 85 case-control comparisons across five common genetic variants, reported a suggestive but not definitively confirmed association between RFC1 polymorphisms and an increased risk of NTDs. Specifically, in their sub-analysis of 42 studies regarding the RFC1 80A>G (rs1051266) variant, a potential link to NTD susceptibility was identified; however, this association was confirmed only within Asian populations. The lack of significance in other groups was attributed to the contradictory results frequently observed in studies involving Caucasian populations. These findings align with our current results, which also revealed no significant association between the RFC1 80A>G genotypes and NTD births (p = 0.605), further underscoring the population-specific nature of this genetic risk factor.
However, in contrast, a study by Cao and colleagues [27] reported a statistical difference in the allele and genotype frequencies of rs1051266 in RFC1 gene between cases and controls and the risk for NTDs was also higher in children with G allele and GG genotype, compared with A allele and AA genotype, respectively [27]. Some researchers have suggested that the G allele is associated with reduced folate transport efficiency, leading to lower intracellular folate levels [21,26]. This folate deficiency can impair nucleotide biosynthesis and methylation reactions, which are critical for neural tube closure during embryogenesis. Similarly, a study conducted on the Han population in Northern China reported a significant correlation between a RFC1 polymorphism (rs1051266) and increased NTD risk, particularly implicating the G allele [27].
Similarly, the rs1051266 polymorphism was associated with NTD susceptibility in both Italian [21] and Polish populations but not in Irish populations or in at least some Ethiopian population groups [25], suggesting that the genetic influence of RFC1 polymorphisms or additional factors may vary across different populations. This health impact associated with rs1051266 is reportedly due to Arg27His amino acid substitution that occurs when the G allele is substituted by A in an RFC1 polymorphism and may impair folate transport efficiency. The A allele (His27) is associated with reduced folate transport activity, potentially leading to lower intracellular folate levels and elevated homocysteine, a known teratogen that disrupts endothelial function and contributes to neural tube defects. Additionally, the Arg-to-His substitution may affect RFC1 protein stability and membrane localization, further reducing folate uptake and increasing NTD risk [21].
There are also a few studies indicating increased risk of congenital anomalies like NTD births [27] as well as orofacial and conotruncal heart defects in the presence of RFC1 A80G polymorphism [14]. These divergent results may indicate gene–nutrient interactions, variation in ethnicity, sample size limitations among cases and controls, or methodological difference across studies.
Unlike the rs1051266 SNP in RFC1, the effect of rs1131596 polymorphism has not to our knowledge, been studied in relation to NTDs. However, this SNP located in the SLC19A1 gene and encoding the RFC1 protein has shown variable associations with several other disease conditions like recurrent pregnancy loss [28], leukemia [24], ischemic stroke, silent brain infarction [29] and oral cavity cancers. Notably, rs1051266 (A80G), a missense variant altering the protein sequence (His > Arg), is in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs1131596 (r2 = 0.98) [29]. Thus, any observed associations in other studies on rs1131596 may stem from its LD with rs1051266. The indirect implication of rs1131596 in folate metabolism, through its linkage to rs1051266, suggests a potential association with NTDs. While direct evidence linking rs1131596 to NTDs is lacking, its role in altering folate metabolism provides a plausible basis for its potential contribution to NTD births.
In our study, maternal age, education, and household economic status had no significant association with neural tube defects (NTDs), aligning with findings from local case–control studies in Eastern Ethiopia [30] and at Debre Berhan Specialized Hospital [31], which reported no significant relationships after adjusting for confounders. These results are also consistent with evidence from a large multi-centered U.S. case–control study [32], which found no association between socioeconomic factors, including maternal age, education, and income, with the occurrence of NTDs. However, some of the studies in a meta-analysis showed contradictory results, i.e an increased risk of congenital anomalies like NTD to women living in deprived neighborhoods measured according to income, education and occupation [33]. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of NTD births with genetic predispositions, folate metabolism disruptions, and environmental factors playing more decisive roles than demographic variables.
Although the primary analyses were conducted using unadjusted logistic regression models, based on the biological premise that genotypes are fixed at conception and are generally independent of most environmental and demographic factors, we further performed a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the potential influence of key baseline characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age and educational status yielded results consistent with the unadjusted analyses under the recessive genetic model for both RFC1 polymorphisms. The findings from our sensitivity analysis were consistent with the unadjusted results, further supporting the multifactorial etiology of NTDs in the Ethiopian context. This observation aligns with recent regional meta-analyses which emphasize that while genetic predispositions are critical, they operate within a complex framework of nutritional and environmental factors [33].
While minor variations in the magnitude and direction of the effect estimates were observed, none reached statistical significance, and the overall interpretation remained unchanged. These findings support the strength of the unadjusted models and suggest that the assessed baseline characteristics did not materially confound the observed associations. Nonetheless, this should be considered when interpreting the results, and future studies with larger sample sizes may enable more comprehensive adjusted analyses incorporating additional relevant factors.
The expected HWE was not observed in the control group for either RFC1 polymorphisms. Thus, these results should be interpreted with caution, because case–control studies assume the existence of HWE at least in controls. Several factors may contribute to such deviations, including population stratification, selection bias, small sample size, and potential genotyping error [34]. In the present study, the Ethiopian population is characterized by substantial genetic diversity and possible substructure, which may lead to non-random genotype distributions. In addition, the hospital-based recruitment of controls may have introduced selection bias.
To minimize the likelihood of technical artifacts, rigorous genotyping quality-control measures were implemented, including adherence to standardized laboratory protocols, use of appropriate controls, and repeat genotyping of a subset of samples to ensure reproducibility. These steps reduce the likelihood that the observed deviation is due to genotyping error.
Although no significant association was observed, this study provides important genetic epidemiological data from Ethiopia, a population with one of the highest reported neural tube defect burdens globally [7] and where genetic studies of folate metabolism pathways remain scarce. The relatively small sample size, particularly the limited number of cases, may have reduced the statistical power of the study to detect modest genetic effects. As a result, the absence of statistically significant associations should be interpreted with caution and not necessarily as evidence of no effect. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and provide more precise estimates of the association between RFC1 polymorphisms and NTD births.
This study provides important insights into the genetic epidemiology of neural tube defects in an underrepresented population. To our knowledge, this is among the first to investigate RFC1 polymorphisms rs1131596 and rs1051266 in an Ethiopian population. The findings contribute novel data on allele frequencies and genotype distributions in this setting and highlight the potential variability of genetic associations across different populations. Given the role of RFC1 in folate transport and metabolism, these results add to the growing body of evidence exploring genetic susceptibility to NTDs and underscore the need for population-specific investigations.
4.1. Strengths of the Study
This study has several notable strengths. The case–control design is appropriate for investigating NTDs, which are relatively rare but carry substantial morbidity and mortality, allowing efficient comparison between affected and unaffected births. The use of robust molecular techniques, including PCR and genomic sequencing, enhanced the accuracy of polymorphism detection and minimized genotyping error.
Although no significant association was observed between NTDs and the selected RFC1 polymorphism, the study identified a high frequency and diversity of genetic variants, providing important baseline evidence of genetic heterogeneity that may contribute to NTD births. Notably, this is the first study in Ethiopia to examine these polymorphisms using maternal whole-blood DNA, adding novel and valuable data to the local genetic research landscape.
Conducting the study in Ethiopia, a country with one of the highest (104.0 per 10,000 births) [7] reported burdens of NTD-related mortality globally, further strengthens its public health relevance. Studying genetic polymorphisms in such a high-burden context enhances the relevance of the findings and supports the need for continued genetic and nutritional research to inform prevention strategies.
4.2. Limitations of the Study
This study has some limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the relatively small sample size, particularly the limited number of cases compared with controls, may have reduced the statistical power to detect modest genetic associations. In addition, while the present study focused on selected polymorphisms using targeted molecular approaches, future studies incorporating larger sample sizes and whole-genome or exome sequencing would allow a more comprehensive assessment of genetic variation and may better capture the complex genetic architecture underlying NTDs.
5. Conclusions
Although this study did not identify a statistically significant association between maternal RFC1 gene polymorphisms and the occurrence of NTD-affected births, the findings do not eliminate the possibility of a genetic contribution. Given the complex and multifactorial nature of NTDs, the role of RFC1 variants may be subtle or context-dependent, requiring more sensitive or comprehensive approaches to detect.
To gain a more complete understanding of the genetic architecture underlying NTDs in the Ethiopian population, further investigations are necessary. Advanced genomic techniques such as whole-genome sequencing of RFC1 and other genes involved in folate metabolism could help identify rare or interacting variants that contribute to NTD susceptibility. Such efforts are crucial for informing future prevention strategies and tailoring interventions to high-risk groups.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) laboratory staff for their support in the secure storage and preprocessing of blood samples collected for this study. We also thank colleagues from the Oklahoma State University (OSU) Nutritional Sciences Laboratory for their technical assistance and in-kind donation of laboratory supplies. In particular, we acknowledge Meseret Woldeyohannes (EPHI), Melat Belayneh, and Zelalem Chimdesa for their valuable support during the study. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT (version 5.2) to assist with table formatting in accordance with the journal template and to improve the clarity of language in selected sections. The authors critically reviewed and edited all content generated with the assistance of this tool and take full responsibility for the integrity, accuracy, and originality of the work.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| AAU | Addis Ababa University |
| ALFA | Allele Frequency Aggregator |
| EPHI | Ethiopian Public Health Institute |
| HWE | Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium |
| ICD | International Classification of Diseases |
| MAF | Mean Allele Frequency |
| MTHFR | Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase |
| NCBI | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| NTD | Neural Tube Defect |
| ODK | Open Data Kit |
| OSU | Oklahoma State University |
| PCR | Polymerase Chain Reaction |
| RFC | Reduced Folate Carrier |
| SNP | Single Nucleotide Polymorphism |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.T.M., W.C. and D.G.; methodology, W.C., B.S. and H.T.M.; software, H.T.M. and W.C.; validation, W.C., formal analysis, H.T.M.; investigation, H.T.M. and W.C.; resources, D.G., W.C. and B.S.; data curation and writing—original draft preparation, H.T.M.; writing—review and editing, B.S., W.C. and D.G.; visualization, W.C.; supervision, W.C. and B.S.; project administration, D.G. and H.T.M.; funding acquisition, D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Boards of Addis Ababa University (IRB No. 04-14-2021, 28 September 2021) and Oklahoma State University (IRB No. 24-234, 5 August 2024). As the biological samples were shipped from Ethiopia to OSU, USA, material transfer agreement and additional ethical approval was obtained from the National Research Ethics Review Board of the Ministry of Education, Ethiopia (IRB No. 17/246/818/22, 27 October 2022). Prior to study initiation, formal authorization was obtained from the Chief Executive Officer of each participating health facility. Approval letters included detailed descriptions of the study objectives, data collection procedures, and participant information sheets, together with requests to identify eligible participants and to access the respective hospital departments including the pediatric neurosurgery. Institutional permission was subsequently granted by the respective, confirming adherence to ethical standards and regulatory requirements. All participants were recruited using a written informed consent process conducted in accordance with approved ethical guidelines.
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study. Participant data were anonymized and accessible only to the principal investigator whereas the other authors had access only to de-identified data. Consent was obtained from all mothers for participation in the interview questionnaire, collection and genetic analysis of blood samples, and publication of study findings in scientific journals.
Data Availability Statement
Ethical and legal restrictions specified in the approved protocol preclude unrestricted public deposition of the individual-level data. De-identified data, including chromatograms, and summary statistics not presented in the manuscript may be made available upon reasonable request to the first author, contingent on approval by the relevant ethics committee and the execution of a data-transfer agreement. Requests should be directed to the first author and will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Gates Foundation through the GeoNutrition project (INV-009129). The genetic analysis conducted at Oklahoma State University (OSU), USA, was made possible through the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) under the research training and capacity-building partnership with Addis Ababa University (Sida Contribution ID: 51080124). The funders had no role in the design, execution, analysis or interpretation of the data.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Isaković J., Šimunić I., Jagečić D., Hribljan V., Mitrečić D. Overview of Neural Tube Defects: Gene–Environment Interactions, Preventative Approaches and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines. 2022;10:965. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10050965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Copp A.J., Stanier P., Greene N.D. Neural Tube Defects: Recent Advances, Unsolved Questions, and Controversies. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:799–810. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70110-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wilde J.J., Petersen J.R., Niswander L. Genetic, Epigenetic, and Environmental Contributions to Neural Tube Closure. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2014;48:583–611. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ravi K.S., Divasha, Hassan S.B., Pasi R., Mittra S., Kumar R. Neural Tube Defects: Different types and brief review of neurulation process and its clinical implication. J Fam. Med. Prim. Care. 2021;10:4383–4390. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_904_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kancherla V. Neural Tube Defects: A Review of Global Prevalence, Causes, and Primary Prevention. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2023;39:1703–1710. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-05910-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Berihu B.A., Welderufael A.L., Berhe Y., Magana T., Mulugeta A., Asfaw S., Gebreselassie K. High Burden of Neural Tube Defects in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: Hospital-Based Study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0206212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Madrid L., Vyas K.J., Kancherla V., Leulseged H., Suchdev P.S., Bassat Q., Sow S.O., Arifeen S.E., Madhi S.A., Onyango D., et al. Neural Tube Defects as a Cause of Death among Stillbirths, Infants, and Children Younger than 5 Years in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia: An Analysis of the CHAMPS Network. Lancet Glob. Health. 2023;11:e1041–e1052. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00191-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Molloy A.M., Pangilinan F., Brody L.C. Genetic Risk Factors for Folate-Responsive Neural Tube Defects. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2017;37:269–291. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cai C.-Q., Fang Y.-L., Shu J.-B., Zhao L.-S., Zhang R.-P., Cao L.-R., Wang Y.-Z., Zhi X.-F., Cui H.-L., Shi O.-Y., et al. Association of Neural Tube Defects with Maternal Alterations and Genetic Polymorphisms in One-Carbon Metabolic Pathway. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2019;45:37. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0630-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Finnell R.H., Caiaffa C.D., Kim S.-E., Lei Y., Steele J., Cao X., Tukeman G., Lin Y.L., Cabrera R.M., Wlodarczyk B.J. Gene Environment Interactions in the Etiology of Neural Tube Defects. Front. Genet. 2021;12:659612. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.659612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rochtus A., Jansen K., Geet C., Freson K. Nutri-Epigenomic Studies Related to Neural Tube Defects: Does Folate Affect Neural Tube Closure Via Changes in DNA Methylation? MRMC. 2015;15:1095–1102. doi: 10.2174/1389557515666150909144828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yee S.W., Gong L., Badagnani I., Giacomini K.M., Klein T.E., Altman R.B. SLC19A1 Pharmacogenomics Summary. Pharmacogenetics Genom. 2010;20:708–715. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32833eca92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gao Y., Sheng C., Xie R., Sun W., Asztalos E., Moddemann D., Zwaigenbaum L., Walker M., Wen S.W. New Perspective on Impact of Folic Acid Supplementation during Pregnancy on Neurodevelopment/Autism in the Offspring Children—A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0165626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shaw G.M., Zhu H., Lammer E.J., Yang W., Finnell R.H. Genetic Variation of Infant Reduced Folate Carrier (A80G) and Risk of Orofacial and Conotruncal Heart Defects. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003;158:747–752. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kakebeen A.D., Niswander L. Micronutrient Imbalance and Common Phenotypes in Neural Tube Defects. Genesis. 2021;59:e23455. doi: 10.1002/dvg.23455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Relton C.L., Wilding C.S., Pearce M.S., Laffling A.J., Jonas P.A., Lynch S.A., Tawn E.J., Burn J. Gene–Gene Interaction in Folate-Related Genes and Risk of Neural Tube Defects in a UK Population. J. Med. Genet. 2004;41:256–260. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.010694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Untergasser A., Cutcutache I., Koressaar T., Ye J., Faircloth B.C., Remm M., Rozen S.G. Primer3—New Capabilities and Interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e115. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hart M.D., Girma M., Strong M.D., Tadesse B.T., Taddesse B.M., Alemayehu F.R., Stoecker B.J., Chowanadisai W. Vitamin D Binding Protein Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Lower Plasma 25-Hydroxy-Cholecalciferol Concentrations in Ethiopian Lactating Women. Nutr. Res. 2022;107:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2022.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.National Center for Biotechnology Information dbSNP: Rs1051266. [(accessed on 16 April 2024)]; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs1051266.
- 20.National Center for Biotechnology Information dbSNP: Rs1131596. [(accessed on 16 April 2024)]; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs1131596.
- 21.De Marco P., Calevo M.G., Moroni A., Merello E., Raso A., Finnell R.H., Zhu H., Andreussi L., Cama A., Capra V. Reduced Folate Carrier Polymorphism (80A→G) and Neural Tube Defects. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2003;11:245–252. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Franke B., Vermeulen S.H.H.M., Steegers-Theunissen R.P.M., Coenen M.J., Schijvenaars M.M.V.A.P., Scheffer H., Den Heijer M., Blom H.J. An Association Study of 45 Folate-related Genes in Spina Bifida: Involvement of Cubilin (CUBN) and tRNA Aspartic Acid Methyltransferase 1 (TRDMT1) Birth Defects Res. 2009;85:216–226. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.O’Leary V.B., Pangilinan F., Cox C., Parle-McDermott A., Conley M., Molloy A.M., Kirke P.N., Mills J.L., Brody L.C., Scott J.M. Reduced Folate Carrier Polymorphisms and Neural Tube Defect Risk. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2006;87:364–369. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2005.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang T., Lou J., Zhong R., Wu J., Zou L., Sun Y., Lu X., Liu L., Miao X., Xiong G. Variants in the Folate Pathway and the Risk of Neural Tube Defects: A Meta-Analysis of the Published Literature. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dewelle W.K., Melka D.S., Aklilu A.T., Gebremariam M.Y., Alemayehu M.A., Alemayehu D.H., Woldemichael T.S., Gebre S.G. Polymorphisms in Maternal Selected Folate Metabolism-Related Genes in Neural Tube Defect-Affected Pregnancy. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2023;12:160. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_103_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee S., Gleeson J.G. Closing in on Mechanisms of Open Neural Tube Defects. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43:519–532. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cao L., Wang Y., Zhang R., Dong L., Cui H., Fang Y., Zhao L., Shi O., Cai C. Association of Neural Tube Defects with Gene Polymorphisms in One-Carbon Metabolic Pathway. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2018;34:277–284. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3558-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Darweesh H., Eissa A.A. Effect of SLC19A1 Gene Polymorphism and Haplotypes on Idiopathic Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Among Women In Duhok City. Sci. J. Univ. Zakho. 2025;13:620–627. doi: 10.25271/sjuoz.2025.13.4.1604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cho Y., Kim J.O., Lee J.H., Park H.M., Jeon Y.J., Oh S.H., Bae J., Park Y.S., Kim O.J., Kim N.K. Association of Reduced Folate Carrier-1 (RFC-1) Polymorphisms with Ischemic Stroke and Silent Brain Infarction. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0115295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mohamed F.A., Dheresa M., Raru T.B., Yusuf N., Hassen T.A., Mehadi A., Wilfong T., Tukeni K.N., Kure M.A., Roba K.T. Determinants of Neural Tube Defects among Newborns in Public Referral Hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia. BMC Nutr. 2023;9:93. doi: 10.1186/s40795-023-00752-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mulu G.B., Atinafu B.T., Tarekegn F.N., Adane T.D., Tadese M., Wubetu A.D., Kebede W.M. Factors Associated with Neural Tube Defects among Newborns Delivered at Debre Berhan Specialized Hospital, North Eastern Ethiopia, 2021. Case-Control Study. Front. Pediatr. 2022;9:795637. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.795637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yang J., Carmichael S.L., Canfield M., Song J., Shaw G.M., the National Birth Defects Prevention Study Socioeconomic Status in Relation to Selected Birth Defects in a Large Multicentered US Case-Control Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2008;167:145–154. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bitew Z.W., Worku T., Alebel A., Alemu A. Magnitude and Associated Factors of Neural Tube Defects in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Glob. Pediatr. Health. 2020;7:2333794X20939423. doi: 10.1177/2333794X20939423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hosking L., Lumsden S., Lewis K., Yeo A., McCarthy L., Bansal A., Riley J., Purvis I., Xu C.-F. Detection of Genotyping Errors by Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium Testing. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2004;12:395–399. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Ethical and legal restrictions specified in the approved protocol preclude unrestricted public deposition of the individual-level data. De-identified data, including chromatograms, and summary statistics not presented in the manuscript may be made available upon reasonable request to the first author, contingent on approval by the relevant ethics committee and the execution of a data-transfer agreement. Requests should be directed to the first author and will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
