Skip to main content
Pathogens logoLink to Pathogens
. 2026 Mar 25;15(4):348. doi: 10.3390/pathogens15040348

Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Clostridium tertium Infection Following Obstructed Obturator Hernia Repair: A Case Report and Literature Review

Jin Lu 1,2, Guanjun Zhan 3, Zhongjing Meng 1,2, Yuchen Zhang 1,2, Xiangkai Zhuge 4,*
Editor: Carmelo Biondo
PMCID: PMC13118552  PMID: 42075675

Abstract

Clostridium tertium is an emerging opportunistic pathogen typically associated with immunocompromised hosts, yet it can also cause serious infections in non-neutropenic individuals. We present a case of postoperative peritonitis and bacteremia caused by C. tertium in a non-neutropenic 75-year-old woman following emergency obturator hernia repair. Diagnosis was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and successful treatment was achieved with piperacillin–tazobactam combined with levornidazole alongside surgical source control. A review of 128 cumulative cases (including ours) revealed two distinct patterns: bacteremia in severely neutropenic patients versus a broader spectrum of localized and bloodstream infections in non-neutropenic hosts, often linked to intestinal barrier disruption. Mortality was largely driven by underlying comorbidities and polymicrobial sepsis. These findings indicate that C. tertium infection should be considered in non-neutropenic patients with postoperative or gastrointestinal barrier-disruptive infections, especially when there is a poor response to initial empiric therapy. Consequently, in such clinical scenarios, empirical therapy should be guided by its unique resistance pattern, favoring carbapenems, vancomycin, or piperacillin–tazobactam, often combined with a nitroimidazole, alongside urgent source control.

Keywords: Clostridium tertium, intra-abdominal infection, obturator hernia, postoperative complication, non-neutropenic host

1. Introduction

Clostridium tertium is an aerotolerant, spore-forming, Gram-positive bacillus, an uncommon but increasingly recognized opportunistic human pathogen. As part of the normal microbiota, it colonizes the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and is also present in soil. It primarily causes infection in immunocompromised hosts, patients with underlying gastrointestinal disorders, or following abdominal procedures [1]. Unlike many toxigenic Clostridium species, C. tertium has historically been regarded as non-toxin-producing, although its pathogenic mechanisms are under reevaluation [2].

Its clinical management is complicated by two key characteristics. First, accurate identification is challenging due to its aerotolerant nature, which permits growth under ambient atmospheric conditions and frequently leads to misidentification as Bacillus, Lactobacillus, or even Gram-negative rods in routine cultures [3,4]. Second, it exhibits an atypical and challenging antimicrobial susceptibility profile. This includes variable susceptibility to metronidazole, frequent resistance to clindamycin and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins [4,5], and, notably, a predictable resistance to many third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone and cefotaxime [6,7]. This specific resistance profile may facilitate its selection and emergence as a breakthrough pathogen in patients receiving empirical therapy with these agents.

C. tertium infections have been documented in diverse clinical contexts, including necrotizing soft tissue infections, osteomyelitis, empyema, and ocular infections, typically following compromise of local barriers or direct inoculation. However, due to its diagnostic pitfalls and atypical susceptibility pattern, the full clinical spectrum and optimal management strategies remain incompletely defined. To address this knowledge gap, we report a novel case of postoperative peritonitis and bacteremia due to C. tertium in an elderly patient following emergency surgery for an obstructed obturator hernia, and complement it with a comprehensive review of published international case reports and series, including literature in English, Chinese, and other languages. This work aims to delineate the clinical spectrum of C. tertium infections, compare its epidemiological patterns across different host populations, and synthesize a contemporary evidence base to guide risk assessment and therapeutic decision-making.

2. Case Presentation

A 75-year-old woman presented with acute abdominal pain, distension, nausea, and vomiting one day after a mechanical fall, later developing coffee-ground vomitus. A computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a right obturator hernia with small bowel involvement, proximal bowel dilation, intra-abdominal fluid, and pneumatosis, confirming acute small bowel obstruction. Her vital signs were stable on admission, but laboratory tests revealed leukocytosis (white blood cell count 11.75 × 109/L, reference range: 3.5–9.5 × 109/L) with a neutrophilic predominance (89.4%, reference range: 40–75%) and C-reactive protein (42.38 mg/L, reference range: 0–3.0 mg/L). Following preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, she underwent emergency laparoscopic surgery which included hernia reduction, resection of non-viable bowel, peritoneal lavage, and placement of a drain. Intraoperative hypotension occurred and was managed with vasopressor support, followed by transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Empiric intravenous cefoperazone–sulbactam was initiated for intra-abdominal infection. However, her condition deteriorated on postoperative day 2, necessitating mechanical ventilation. Significant leukocytosis (white blood cell count 18.40 × 109/L, reference range: 3.5–9.5 × 109/L) and rising inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein 84.26 mg/L, reference range: 0–3.0 mg/L, procalcitonin 6.03 ng/mL, reference range: 0–0.5 ng/mL) were observed alongside persistent abdominal tenderness and drainage of purulent fluid. After inoculation of blood and peritoneal drainage samples onto blood agar plates and anaerobic incubation at 37 °C for 48 h, the isolated organism was identified as C. tertium using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; Autobio MS-600 instrument (Autobio Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China)). Formal antimicrobial susceptibility testing was not performed as standardized anaerobic susceptibility testing protocols were unavailable at our institution. Given the clinical progression despite the initial regimen (cefoperazone–sulbactam) and based on the literature reports indicating the potential efficacy of piperacillin–tazobactam combined with a nitroimidazole against C. tertium infections [8,9], the empirical therapy was switched to piperacillin–tazobactam plus levornidazole (a nitroimidazole antimicrobial).

Source control was maintained via the indwelling drain, along with general supportive care in the ICU. As inflammatory markers declined, enteral nutrition was initiated. The patient’s condition gradually improved, followed by normalization of leukocyte count and inflammatory markers. Antibiotics were discontinued after a 10-day course, as the patient achieved clinical resolution (normalized leukocyte count, resolution of abdominal tenderness, and negative repeat cultures) and in accordance with recommendations for intra-abdominal infections caused by anaerobic pathogens. She was subsequently transferred to a general ward and made a full recovery, and was discharged home two weeks later.

Literature Review Methodology

To complement our case findings and summarize the existing evidence on C. tertium infections, we conducted a comprehensive, non-systematic narrative review of the literature. We performed literature searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang Database for articles published up to December 2025, using search terms including “Clostridium tertium,” “C. tertium infection,” and “C. tertium bacteremia.” Additional references were identified through bibliography screening. We included published case reports and series describing human infections with microbiologically confirmed C. tertium. Reviews, non-human studies, and duplicate reports were excluded. Data on patient demographics, clinical features, management, and outcomes were extracted by one author and cross-checked by another. Therefore, given the narrative and integrative aim of this review, a formal systematic review protocol was not preregistered, and a risk of bias assessment of individual case reports was not performed.

3. Discussion

3.1. Clinical and Epidemiological Spectrum

This report describes a novel presentation of postoperative peritonitis and bacteremia caused by C. tertium following emergency surgery for an obstructed obturator hernia. This case, involving an elderly patient with acute bowel compromise but without classic neutropenia, expands the recognized clinical spectrum beyond severely immunocompromised hosts and underscores its role as an opportunistic pathogen in settings of gastrointestinal barrier disruption. To contextualize our findings, we conducted a comprehensive narrative literature review as detailed in Section Literature Review Methodology, which included for analysis five case series (74 patients) and 44 case reports (53 patients), in addition to our index case.

Our analysis reveals two distinct epidemiological patterns (summarized in Table 1 and Table 2). Case series data depict a highly uniform profile: infections occur almost exclusively in severely neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies (98.6%, 73/74), universally present as bacteremia (100%), and are strongly linked to prior broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure [10]. This clustering [11] points to an endogenous, gut-derived pathogenesis facilitated by chemotherapy-induced mucosal injury, impaired immunity, and antibiotic selective pressure (e.g., from third-generation cephalosporins [12]).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Clostridium tertium infections in immunocompromised hosts: summary of case series.

Authors/
Publication Year
No. of
Cases
Age Range
(Years)
Sex
(M:F)
Clinical
Features
Predisposing
Factors
Effective Antimicrobial Therapy Outcome
Thaler M et al., 1986 [6] 10 9–64 6:4 Bacteremia (7), Intra-
abdominal infection
/Perirectal cellulitis (5), Intra-abdominal abscess (2), Pleural empyema (1), Fever
Hematologic malignancies (9/10), Neutropenia, Prior broad-
spectrum antibiotics
Vancomycin (added in 5 cases), Chloramphenicol (added in 4 cases) 6 survived; 4 died (underlying disease progression, polymicrobial sepsis)
Speirs G et al., 1988 [12] 18 14–79 10:8 bacteremia (18), Abdominal pain/Diarrhea/Rectal bleeding (15), Perianal cellulitis (3) Hematologic malignancies (18), Neutropenia (18), Prior 3rd-gen cephalosporin use Vancomycin (used in 14/18 patients) 14 survived; 4 died (polymicrobial bacteremia, septic shock)
Valtonen M et al., 1990 [11] 7 19–58 3:4 Bacteremia (7), Perirectal/
Cecal cellulitis (3), Febrile neutropenia
Acute leukemia (7), Neutropenia (7), Recent 3rd-gen cephalosporin therapy Vancomycin, (added to regimen in 5 patients) 6 survived; 1 died (disseminated aspergillosis, pulmonary embolism)
Miller DL et al., 2001 [13] 32 16–75 20:12 Bacteremia (32), Febrile episode (32), Gastrointestinal symptoms (19) Neutropenia (29/32), Hematologic malignancies, Chemotherapy, β-lactam exposure Not specified per case 28 survived; 4 died within 1 week (underlying leukemia, polymicrobial infection, bowel ischemia)
Shah S et al., 2016 [10] 7 36–82 4:3 Bacteremia (7), Febrile neutropenia (7), Gastrointestinal complaints (4) AML/MDS (7), Neutropenia (7),
Chemotherapy
Vancomycin (used in 6/7 patients), Ciprofloxacin, Metronidazole (used in combination) 2 survived; 5 died (progression of hematologic malignancy)

Note: M: male, F: female, AML: acute myeloid leukemia, MDS: myelodysplastic syndrome, ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, CML: chronic myeloid leukemia, NEC: necrotizing enterocolitis, SBP: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, ESRD: end-stage renal disease.

Table 2.

Clinical data summary of 53 patients with Clostridium tertium infection.

Authors/
Publication Year
Age/
Gender
Clinical Symptoms Specimen Possible Risk Factors Probable Source Antimicrobial Therapy Following Clostridium tertium Diagnosis Course of Treatment
King BM et al., 1963 [14] 7/M Fever, cough, leukocytosis, lung consolidation Blood Influenza-like illness Respiratory Penicillin Survived
7/M Fever, leukocytosis, lung consolidation Blood Influenza-like illness Respiratory Penicillin, tetracycline Survived
Butler T et al., 1982 [15] 42/F Jaundice, ascites, fever Ascitic fluid Cirrhosis, prior antibiotics GIT Cefoxitin Survived
Weiser J et al., 1987 [16] 60/F Fever, bowel obstruction Blood Severe retardation, surgery NS Penicillin Survived
Johnson JR et al., 1988 [17] 48/M Fever, respiratory distress, leukocytosis Blood, sputum Alcohol withdrawal, aspiration pneumonia Aspiration pneumonia Cefazolin Survived
Leichtman DA et al., 1989 [18] 72/F Fever, confusion, hearing deficit Blood CML, severe leukopenia Middle ear infection Cefazolin Survived
Brown EA et al., 1989 [19] 29/M Fever, neutropenia Blood ALL, chemotherapy GIT Vancomycin, clindamycin Survived
Lew JF et al., 1990 [20] 8/F Periorbital swelling, frontal abscess Swab, brain tissue Penetrating injury, soil contamination Soil/wound Penicillin G Survived
Coleman N et al., 1993 [21] 15/M Diarrhea, abdominal pain, neutropenia Blood, feces ALL relapse, neutropenia GIT Ciprofloxacin, vancomycin Survived
Gosbell IB et al., 1996 [22] 19/F Fever, abdominal pain, neutropenia Blood ALL relapse, neutropenia GIT Metronidazole, vancomycin Survived
57/F Diarrhea, fever, abdominal sepsis Blood Ulcerative colitis, intra-abdominal sepsis Intra-abdominal sepsis Ciprofloxacin and metronidazole after ticarcillin/
clavulanate and gentamicin
Survived
Kourtis AP et al., 1997 [23] 12/F Headache, fever, meningitis CSF Congenital fistulae, prior antibiotics GIT/
genital tract
Vancomycin, metronidazole Survived
Steyaert S et al., 1999 [24] 65/M Fever, diarrhea, neutropenia Blood AML, neutropenia GIT Vancomycin Survived
55/M Fever, diarrhea, neutropenia Blood ALL, neutropenia GIT Vancomycin Survived
Gredlein CM et al., 2000 [25] 37/M Foot edema, warmth, erythema Synovial fluid Penetrating trauma Soil/trauma Clindamycin, penicillin G Survived
Miller DL et al., 2001 [13] 28/M Abdominal pain, diarrhea Blood Crohn’s disease GIT Ciprofloxacin, clindamycin Survived
Cheah FC et al., 2001 [26] Preterm/M Feeding intolerance, abdominal distension CSF Prematurity, NEC GIT Penicillin, metronidazole Died (catheter-related septicemia)
Ray P et al., 2003 [27] 58/M Ulcers, fever, leg gangrene Necrotic tissue Alcoholism, lymphoma, chemotherapy Soil/GIT Metronidazole, vancomycin, imipenem Survived
40/M Leg gangrene, fever Necrotic tissue Trauma Soil/wound Penicillin, metronidazole Survived
Séverin A et al., 2005 [3] 61/F Abdominal pain, septic shock Abdominal fluid, blood Pancreatitis, prior antibiotics Soil/GIT Ciprofloxacin, piperacillin/
tazobactam
Died (nosocomial pneumonia)
Tappe D et al., 2005 [28] 51/F Abdominal pain, septic shock Blood Ileus, postoperative state GIT Mezlocillin, metronidazole Died (septic shock with multi-organ failure)
Leegaard TM et al., 2005 [4] 53/M Fever, neutropenia Blood AML, neutropenia GIT Imipenem Survived
33/F Fever, pancytopenia Blood MDS, stem cell transplant GIT Meropenem Died (multi-organ failure)
12/F Fever, neutropenia Blood ALL relapse, neutropenia GIT Gentamicin, amoxicillin Survived
Del Rosario-
Quintana C et al.,
2006 [29]
80/M Jaundice, ascites Ascitic fluid Cirrhosis, nursing home GIT Imipenem Survived
Fujitani S et al., 2007 [30] 51/M Skin abscesses, myonecrosis Wound material IV drug use, skin popping Heroin/skin Amoxicillin/
clavulanate and metronidazole after ampicillin/
sulbactam and metronidazole
Survived
Vanderhofstadt M et al., 2010 [31] 51/M Asymptomatic bacteremia Blood AML, pancytopenia GIT Amoxicillin/
clavulanate, ceftazidime
Survived
23/F Fever, leukopenia Blood Lymphoma, chemotherapy GIT Amoxicillin/clavulanate, amikacin, ceftazidime Survived
Steensma EA et al., 2011 [32] 39/M Cellulitis, myonecrosis Tissue Diabetes, IV drug use Skin/environment Penicillin G Survived
Salvador F et al., 2013 [7] 47/F Fever, abdominal pain, neutropenia Blood ALL, chemotherapy GIT Meropenem, vancomycin Survived
Virot E et al., 2015 [33] 40/M Knee pain, bone infection Bone tissue Shrapnel injury Soil/wound Amoxicillin, pristinamycin Survived
You M-J et al., 2015 [5] 44/F Fever, leukopenia Blood Herbicide ingestion GIT Ertapenem, metronidazole Survived
Joichi Y et al., 2016 [34] 50s/M Shock, hypothermia Blood NS GIT Piperacillin/
tazobactam
Died (septic shock)
60s/M Fever, neutropenia Blood AML, chemotherapy GIT Meropenem, vancomycin Survived
Chalhoub V et al., 2016 [35] 54/F Abdominal pain, septic shock Blood Acute colitis GIT Ampicillin, imipenem, vancomycin Survived
Nambiar PH et al., 2016 [1] 53/F Abdominal pain, abscess Blood, abscess fluid Pancreatic cancer, surgery GIT Meropenem Survived
González-Alad MJ et al.,
2016 [36]
6/NS Fever, neutropenia Blood AML, stem cell transplant GIT Vancomycin Survived
Zhang AP et al., 2016 [37] 52/M Headache, meningitis CSF Scalp trauma External environment Vancomycin Survived
Alroumi F et al., 2016 [38] 75/M Dyspnea, empyema Pleural fluid Abdominal surgery, steroids GIT Clindamycin, vancomycin Survived
Sutton SS et al., 2017 [2] 60/M Abdominal pain, ascites Ascitic fluid Cirrhosis, hernia repair GIT Vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, metronidazole Survived
Cong PS et al., 2018 [39] 69/M Abdominal pain, obstruction Blood Intestinal volvulus, surgery GIT Imipenem, metronidazole Survived
Barakat M et al., 2018 [40] 70/M Liver abscess Abscess fluid Diverticulosis, COPD GIT Piperacillin/
tazobactam, metronidazole
Survived
Wazir M et al., 2019 [8] 62/M Ascites, encephalopathy Blood Cirrhosis, SBP GIT Meropenem, vancomycin Died (shock and respiratory failure)
Milano V et al., 2019 [41] 43/M Hepatic abscess Blood Appendectomy, peritonitis GIT Ertapenem Survived
Li J et al., 2019 [42] 55/F Osteomyelitis Bone tissue, secretions Open fracture Trauma/wound Metronidazole Survived
44/F Osteomyelitis Bone tissue, secretions Open trauma Trauma/wound Metronidazole Survived
Morikawa K et al., 2021 [43] 1d/F Sepsis, abdominal distension Blood,
ascitic fluid
Ileal atresia, perforation GIT Meropenem, vancomycin Survived
Bonda S et al., 2022 [44] 79/M Septic shock, peritonitis Blood Colon perforation, alcoholism GIT Meropenem Survived
Saad E et al., 2022 [45] 66/F Septic shock, diverticulitis Blood COVID-19, diabetes, steroids GIT Meropenem, metronidazole, amoxicillin/
clavulanate
Survived
Lamberto Y et al., 2023 [9] 48/M Peritonitis, septic shock Blood, abdominal fluid Cirrhosis, hernia surgery GIT Piperacillin/
tazobactam
Died (septic shock)
Duan Y et al., 2023 [46] 68/F Diarrhea, fever Blood Pancreatic cancer, chemotherapy GIT Piperacillin/
tazobactam
Survived
Zhu W et al., 2024 [47] 54/M Ocular trauma, infection Eye secretions Explosion injury External environment Vancomycin, levofloxacin Survived
Lovering E et al., 2025 [48] 60s/M Empyema, pleural effusion Pleural fluid ESRD, prior peritonitis GIT Metronidazole Died after 4 months (respiratory distress)

Note: Abbreviations as in Table 1; GIT: gastrointestinal tract, CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, NS: not specified.

In contrast, aggregated individual case reports present a more diverse picture. While bacteremia remains common (61.1%, 33/54), localized infections (intra-abdominal, soft tissue/bone, central nervous system) are frequently reported. Underlying conditions are broader, including cirrhosis, trauma, and postoperative states, with a lower prevalence of neutropenia (40.7%, 22/54), indicating increasing recognition in non-neutropenic hosts with local barrier breakdown [1,31]. Consequently, the isolation of C. tertium from sterile sites should prompt evaluation for occult gastrointestinal pathology or anatomical communications with the gut [23].

The pathogenesis of C. tertium infection is tightly linked to barrier disruption and bacterial translocation. Key risk factors include intestinal mucosal injury, neutropenia, and prior exposure to β-lactam antibiotics, particularly third-generation cephalosporins [11,13]. In neutropenic patients, chemotherapy-induced damage facilitates systemic spread, leading to breakthrough bacteremia [10,19]. In non-neutropenic hosts, conditions like cirrhosis, inflammatory bowel disease, or recent surgery serve as the portal of entry [13], as seen in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis [2,8], post-surgical infections [38], and cases following acute colitis or pancreatitis [3,4,35]. Recent cases of ocular infection [47] and empyema [48] further exemplify mechanisms of direct inoculation or contiguous spread.

Despite its historical classification as non-toxigenic, emerging genomic insights reveal putative virulence factors (e.g., EndoA interferase, hemolytic phospholipase C) that may contribute to tissue damage and severe localized infections [21,23]. Clinical severity is reflected in significant rates of septic shock and mortality (ranging from ~14% to 71% in compiled series), often driven by underlying host conditions or polymicrobial sepsis [10,13]. These findings underscore that C. tertium, while often of low individual virulence, can trigger life-threatening illness in compromised hosts.

3.2. Diagnostic Challenges and Advances

Accurate identification of C. tertium has been historically challenging due to its aerotolerance, variable Gram-staining (often leading to misidentification as Bacillus or Lactobacillus), and ability to form spores [20,21,22]. The advent of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry has revolutionized its identification, as exemplified in our case, providing rapid and accurate results that overcome traditional phenotypic pitfalls [7]. In resource-limited settings lacking MALDI-TOF MS, molecular techniques such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing provide a valuable diagnostic alternative, enabling precise species-level identification.

3.3. Management Principles and Antimicrobial Therapy

The management of C. tertium infection is fundamentally predicated on the concurrent application of two principles: prompt and definitive source control, and antimicrobial therapy deliberately selected to overcome its characteristic resistance profile [27,38,40]. For invasive infections, this translates to immediate surgical interventions such as debridement for necrotizing soft tissue infections, drainage for empyema or abscesses, and removal of infected devices.

The selection of antimicrobial agents must be guided by a clear understanding of the pathogen’s susceptibility patterns, as synthesized from 38 clinical isolates in Table 3. It is important to note that the data in Table 3 span a long publication period (1963–2025), and temporal evolution in susceptibility testing methods and breakpoints may influence the interpretation of these aggregated rates. Carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem) and vancomycin demonstrated 100% susceptibility, solidifying their role as cornerstone therapeutic options for serious infections [12,35]. In stark contrast, therapeutic regimens should deliberately avoid clindamycin and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone and cefepime, given their associated high resistance rates of 90.0% and 85.7%, respectively [7,12]. Despite the reported susceptibility of piperacillin–tazobactam being 76.5% (Table 3), its combination with a nitroimidazole (e.g., levornidazole or metronidazole) has been reported as a clinically used strategy, as demonstrated in our case and supported by several reports [8,9]. This approach may be particularly rational in intra-abdominal infections to ensure broad anaerobic coverage and address frequent polymicrobial involvement, although robust in vitro synergy data specific to C. tertium are lacking.

Table 3.

Summary of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in reported cases of Clostridium tertium infection (1963–2025).

Antimicrobial Class & Agent Sensitive (S) Intermediate +
Resistant
Total Isolates Tested Susceptibility Rate (S%)
Penicillins (Penicillin G, Ampicillin) 16 8 24 66.7
β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors (e.g., Amoxicillin–Clavulanate, Piperacillin–Tazobactam) 13 4 17 76.5
Cephalosporins
1st/2nd Generation (e.g., Cefazolin, Cefalotin) 4 3 7 57.1
Cephamycins (e.g., Cefoxitin, Cefotetan) 10 1 11 90.9
3rd/4th Generation (e.g., Ceftriaxone, Cefepime) 2 12 14 14.3
Carbapenems (Imipenem, Meropenem, Ertapenem) 19 0 19 100.0
Vancomycin 20 0 20 100.0
Metronidazole 24 3 27 88.9
Clindamycin 2 18 20 10.0
Fluoroquinolones (e.g., Cliprofloxacin, Levofloxacin) 8 1 9 88.9
Aminoglycosides (e.g., Gentamicin, Amikacin) 0 5 5 0.0

Note: Data are summarized from 38 isolates with susceptibility reported for agents tested in ≥5 cases.

A significant area of therapeutic uncertainty lies in the variable activity of other agents. Susceptibility to penicillins and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations is inconsistent. Perhaps most critically for empirical anaerobic coverage, metronidazole demonstrates a non-negligible rate of non-susceptibility (11.1%), challenging its reliability when C. tertium is suspected [4,27].

In the present case, the initial clinical progression despite therapy with cefoperazone–sulbactam may be explained by the organism’s inherent resistance profile [11,22]. The escalation to piperacillin–tazobactam combined with levornidazole represented a pragmatic strategy, utilizing an alternative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor while providing reinforced anaerobic coverage based on the literature reports of efficacy [8,9]. For severe infections, an initial combination therapy is often employed, typically followed by a total treatment course of 14 to 28 days. Ultimately, successful outcomes depend on integrating rapid diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy that strategically bypasses predictable resistances, and uncompromising source control.

4. Conclusions

We report a novel case of C. tertium postoperative peritonitis and bacteremia following emergency obstructed hernia repair in a non-neutropenic patient. The successful outcome, achieved through timely surgical source control and literature-guided antimicrobial therapy, underscores the manageability of this infection when its unique resistance profile is considered. Our integrated analysis of 128 cases delineates two principal epidemiological patterns: breakthrough bacteremia in neutropenic hosts and a broader spectrum of localized infections in non-neutropenic hosts, both frequently associated with gastrointestinal barrier compromise.

Key clinical implications derived from this review include: (1) empirical antimicrobial therapy should avoid expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and clindamycin, favoring agents like carbapenems, vancomycin, or piperacillin–tazobactam, with caution regarding metronidazole non-susceptibility; (2) prompt and adequate source control is critical; and (3) recognizing that patient outcomes are significantly influenced by underlying comorbidities and polymicrobial sepsis, necessitating holistic management.

This study has several limitations. Foremost, the absence of formal antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the index isolate precludes definitive confirmation of its resistance pattern and limits its contribution to local epidemiology. Furthermore, because the literature synthesis spans over six decades, it inherently incorporates heterogeneity in data quality, reporting standards, and susceptibility testing methodologies. The analysis is also subject to the inherent biases of published case reports and series, such as publication bias and selective reporting. Taken together, these constraints confined our study to a comprehensive narrative synthesis, precluding a formal meta-analysis.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript, the author(s) used DeepSeek-V3.2 (DeepSeek AI) for the purposes of language refinement and text editing. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Author Contributions

Study concept and design: J.L. and Z.M. Literature review and methodology: J.L., G.Z. and X.Z. Data curation: J.L., Z.M. and Y.Z. Analysis and interpretation of data: J.L., G.Z. and X.Z. Writing—review and editing: All authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of IEC for Clinical Research of Zhongda Hospital Southeast University (protocol code 2026ZDSYLL039-P01, 12 March 2026).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the subject in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Nambiar P.H., Belden K.A., Roslund B., Silibovsky R. Sustained Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Nonneutropenic Patient: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 2016;24:201–203. doi: 10.1097/IPC.0000000000000373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sutton S.S., Jumper M., Shah A., Edun B. Clostridium tertium Peritonitis and Concurrent Bacteremia in a Patient with a History of Alcoholic Cirrhosis. J. Investig. Med. High Impact Case Rep. 2017;5:2324709617731457. doi: 10.1177/2324709617731457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Séverin A., Rémi P., Berth A., Balgone L., Coudray J.M., Thyrault M. Acute Pancreatitis Complicated by Clostridium tertium Septicaemia. Presse Med. 2005;34:446–447. doi: 10.1016/S0755-4982(05)83941-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Leegaard T.M., Sandven P., Gaustad P. Clostridium tertium: 3 Case Reports. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2005;37:230–232. doi: 10.1080/00365540410020910-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.You M.J., Shin G.W., Lee C.S. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Patient with Glyphosate Ingestion. Am. J. Case Rep. 2015;16:4–7. doi: 10.12659/ajcr.891287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thaler M., Gill V., Pizzo P.A. Emergence of Clostridium tertium as a Pathogen in Neutropenic Patients. Am. J. Med. 1986;81:596–600. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90543-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Salvador F., Porte L., Durán L., Marcotti A., Pérez J., Thompson L., Noriega L.M., Lois V., Weitzel T. Breakthrough Bacteremia due to Clostridium tertium in a Patient with Neutropenic Fever, and Identification by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;17:e1062–e1063. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wazir M., Jain A.G., Nadeem M., Ur Rahman A., Everett G. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Non-neutropenic Patient with Liver Cirrhosis. Cureus. 2019;11:e4432. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lamberto Y., Huarachi-Chirilla Y., Dominguez C., Saul P., Chedjack V., Cunto E. Bacteriemia por Clostridium tertium en un paciente con cirrosis hepática. Medicina. 2023;83:635–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shah S., Hankenson J., Pabbathi S., Greene J., Nanjappa S. Clostridium tertium in Neutropenic Patients: Case Series at a Cancer Institute. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;51:44–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Valtonen M., Sivonen A., Elonen E. A Cluster of Seven Cases of Clostridium tertium Septicemia in Neutropenic Patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1990;9:40–42. doi: 10.1007/BF01969532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Speirs G., Warren R.E., Rampling A. Clostridium tertium Septicemia in Patients with Neutropenia. J. Infect. Dis. 1988;158:1336–1340. doi: 10.1093/infdis/158.6.1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miller D.L., Brazer S., Murdoch D., Reller L.B., Corey G.R. Significance of Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in Neutropenic and Nonneutropenic Patients: Review of 32 Cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001;32:975–978. doi: 10.1086/319346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.King B.M., Ranck B.A., Daugherty F.D., Rau C.A. Clostridium tertium Septicemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1963;269:467–469. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196308292690909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Butler T., Pitt S. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis due to Clostridium tertium. Gastroenterology. 1982;82:133–134. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(82)90135-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Weiser J. Case Report: Rare Isolate from a Blood Culture (Clostridium tertium) Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 1987;9:94. doi: 10.1016/0196-4399(87)90022-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Johnson J.R., Tenover F.C. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Patient with Aspiration Pneumonia: An Elusive Diagnosis. J. Infect. Dis. 1988;157:854–855. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.4.854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Leichtman D.A., LeBar W.D. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Leukemia Patient. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1989;8:314–315. doi: 10.1007/BF01963460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brown E.A., Talbot G.H., Provencher M., Cassileth P. Anaerobic Bacteremia in Patients with Acute Leukemia. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1989;10:65–69. doi: 10.1086/645963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lew J.F., Wiedermann B.L., Sneed J., Campos J., McCullough D. Aerotolerant Clostridium tertium Brain Abscess following a Lawn Dart Injury. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990;28:2127–2129. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.2127-2129.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Coleman N., Speirs G., Khan J., Broadbent V., Wight D.G., Warren R.E. Neutropenic Enterocolitis Associated with Clostridium tertium. J. Clin. Pathol. 1993;46:180–183. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.2.180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gosbell I.B., Johnson C.G., Newton P.J., Jelfs J. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia: 2 Cases and Review. Pathology. 1996;28:70–73. doi: 10.1080/00313029600169573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kourtis A.P., Weiner R., Belson K., Richards F.O., Jr. Clostridium tertium Meningitis as the Presenting Sign of a Meningocele in a Twelve-Year-Old Child. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 1997;16:527–529. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199705000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Steyaert S., Peleman R., Vaneechoutte M., De Baere T., Claeys G., Verschraegen G. Septicemia in Neutropenic Patients Infected with Clostridium tertium Resistant to Cefepime and Other Expanded-Spectrum Cephalosporins. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37:3778–3779. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.11.3778-3779.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gredlein C.M., Silverman M.L., Downey M.S. Polymicrobial Septic Arthritis due to Clostridium species: Case Report and Review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000;30:590–594. doi: 10.1086/313686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cheah F.C., Lim K.E., Boo N.Y. Clostridium tertium in Cerebrospinal Fluid of a Premature Neonate with Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Contamination or Real? Acta Paediatr. 2001;90:704–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2001.tb02438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ray P., Das A., Singh K., Bhansali A., Yadav T.D. Clostridium tertium in Necrotizing Fasciitis and Gangrene. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003;9:1347–1348. doi: 10.3201/eid0910.030287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tappe D., Dirks J., Müller R., Brederlau J., Abele-Horn M., Suerbaum S., Kurzai O. Fatal Clostridium tertium Septicemia in a Nonneutropenic Patient. J. Infect. 2005;50:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.del Rosario-Quintana C., Monzón-Moreno C., Ojeda-Vargas M. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in an Exalcoholic Elderly Man. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2006;24:401–402. doi: 10.1157/13089697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fujitani S., Liu C.X., Finegold S.M., Song Y.L., Mathisen G.E. Clostridium tertium Isolated from Gas Gangrene Wound; Misidentified as Lactobacillus spp. Initially Due to Aerotolerant Feature. Anaerobe. 2007;13:161–165. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vanderhofstadt M., André M., Lonchay C., Levecque P., Holemans X., Canon J.L., D’Hondt L. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia: Contamination or True Pathogen? A Report of Two Cases and a Review of the Literature. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2010;14:e335–e337. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Steensma E.A., Ertl C.W., Burke L.H. Clostridium tertium Isolated from a Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection in a Diabetic but Otherwise Nonimmunocompromised Patient. J. Am. Coll. Certif. Wound Spec. 2011;3:42–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcws.2011.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Virot E., Servien E., Laurent F., Ferry T., Lyon Bone and Joint Infection Study Group Reactivation of Clostridium tertium Bone Infection 30 Years after the Iran–Iraq War. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2014209169. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-209169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Joichi Y., Kayama S., Hayashi I., Onodera M., Furushimo M., Koba Y., Yokozaki M., Ohge H., Sugai M. Two Cases of Clostridium tertium Infection and Successful Identification of the Organism by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Analysis. Ann. Lab. Med. 2016;36:281–283. doi: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.3.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chalhoub V., Kallab R., El Hajj A., Hachem K., Yazbeck P. Septic Shock due to Clostridium tertium in an Immunocompetent Patient Following Colitis without Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain Med. 2016;35:167–168. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.González-Alad M.J., Alonso Sanz M. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Patient with Febrile Neutropenia: Potential Benefit of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 2016;38:117–118. doi: 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2016.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang A.P., Zou J.M., Yin Y.H. Characterization of a Strain of Clostridium tertium Causing Intracranial Infection. Chin. J. Infect. Chemother. 2016;16:71–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alroumi F., Giaccotto J., Sarwar A., McQuillen D.P. Clostridium tertium Empyema after a Hemi-colectomy and Repair of Incarcerated Hernia. Surg. Infect. Case Rep. 2016;1:146–148. doi: 10.1089/crsi.2016.0041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cong P.S., He H., Peng L.J., Huang X.L., Liu J., Sun G.R. Postoperative Clostridium tertium Bacteremia in a Patient with Intestinal Obstruction: Case Report. Chin. J. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018;11:446–448. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Barakat M., Hernandez S., Benoit J., Pourshahid S., Mamoon Y., Martin G.T. Clostridium tertium: An Unusual Cause of Pyogenic Liver Abscess. ACG Case Rep. J. 2018;5:e30. doi: 10.14309/crj.2018.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Milano V., Biehle L., Patel S., Hammer J. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia and Hepatic Abscess in a Non-neutropenic Patient. IDCases. 2019;15:e00510. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2019.e00510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li J., Hu L., Huo M., Mao M.Z., Zhen J.C. Bone Infection due to Clostridium tertium: Case Reports and Literature Review. Clin. Med. J. 2019;17:80–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Morikawa K., Nozaki M., Hirata K., Abe T., Yanagihara I., Wada K. Clostridium tertium Peritonitis and Bacteremia in a Neonate with Congenital Intestinal Atresia: A Case Report. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2021;40:159–161. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bonda S., Lee K., Rovig J., Asad S. Clostridium Bacteremia and its Implications: A Case Report. IDCases. 2022;29:e01516. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2022.e01516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Saad E., Egoryan G., Padmanabhan S.V., Trongtorsak A., Ramachandran A., Zhang Q., Mohamed K., Friedman H.J. Clostridium tertium Bacteremia: A Marker of an Underlying Perforated Colonic Diverticular Disease in a Non-neutropenic Patient with COVID-19. J. Med. Cases. 2022;13:212–218. doi: 10.14740/jmc3916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Duan Y., Chen X.Y., Wang Y.Q. Bloodstream Infection Caused by Clostridium tertium: One Case Report and Literature Review. Chin. J. Infect. Chemother. 2023;23:323–327. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhu W., Xing Y. A Case of Ocular Infection with Clostridium tertium Caused by a Salute Gun Explosion. Clin. Lab. 2024;70:1769–1773. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lovering E., Haque O., Wolff M. Pleural Empyema due to Polymicrobial Clostridioides difficile, Clostridium tertium and Robinsoniella peoriensis following C. difficile Peritonitis. Anaerobe. 2025;96:103013. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2025.103013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Pathogens are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES