Abstract
The effect of candy reward on I.Q. scores was investigated in 72 first- and second-grade children. All subjects were administered Form A of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and, based upon these scores, were divided into three blocks: low, middle, and high. From each block, subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (contingent reward, noncontingent reward, or no reward) that were in effect during administration of Form B. Results showed that candy given contingent upon each correct response increased I.Q. scores for the initially low scoring subjects, but had no influence on the scores of middle and high scoring subjects.
Keywords: IQ, scores, contingent rewards in testing, noncontingent rewards, standardized tests, children
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ayllon T., Kelly K. Effects of reinforcement on standardized test performance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Winter;5(4):477–484. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edlund C. V. The effect on the test behavior of children, as reflected in the I.Q. scores, when reinforced after each correct response. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Fall;5(3):317–319. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Connor J. J., Weiss F. L. A brief discussion of the efficacy of raising standardized test scores by contingent reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Summer;7(2):351–352. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Tramontana J. Social versus edible rewards as a function of intellectual level and socioeconomic class. Am J Ment Defic. 1972 Jul;77(1):33–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]