Abstract
Industrial emissions of large amounts of CO2 have seriously affected human health, making it imperative to reduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations. However, carbon capture technologies such as chemical absorption and membrane separation are still limited by high regenerative energy costs, corrosion, and low efficiency in diluting flue gas. Within this technological landscape, physical adsorption separation technology, due to its advantages such as a wide operating temperature range, low equipment corrosivity, and low regeneration energy consumption, has gradually become a research hotspot in carbon capture technology. The core of physical adsorption lies in finding high-quality adsorbents. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), with their ultra-high specific surface area, tunable pore structure, and abundant functionalization sites, are considered highly promising next-generation CO2 adsorbent materials. This review summarizes strategies for modifying MOFs to improve CO2 adsorption performance, focusing on aperture adjustment, doped metal ions, functional group doping, and computational screening. Performance enhancements are mechanism-dependent rather than simply additive. Moderate aperture adjustment and defect engineering can improve gas selectivity and CO2 capture capacity, while excessively narrow pores sacrifice available pore volume and gas diffusion. Doped metal ions, particularly in MOF-74 and related materials, can enhance CO2 capture capacity while controlling framework integrity and dopant composition. Functional group Doping remains an effective method for capturing low-partial-pressure CO2. Computational screening is shifting from ranking based on single adsorption capacity to a comprehensive consideration that includes humidity tolerance, stability, and regenerability. Overall, under industrial conditions, modified MOFs should be evaluated by balancing affinity, selectivity, capacity, stability, and energy efficiency. This review provides guidance for the rational design of MOF-based carbon capture adsorbents.
Keywords: metal–organic frameworks, carbon capture adsorbents, modification, aperture adjustment, metal-ion doping, functional group doping, doped metal ions
1. Introduction
Since the Industrial Revolution, the excessive reliance of human society on fossil fuels has led to a sharp increase in the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases, thereby triggering a climate crisis primarily manifested as global warming. Among the various greenhouse gases, CO2 is widely recognized as the dominant contributor to the greenhouse effect because of its large emission volume and long atmospheric lifetime. As of 2026, the atmospheric CO2 concentration remains above 420 ppm, as shown in Figure 1. This is accompanied by an increase in extreme weather events, including severe floods, prolonged droughts, and accelerated cryosphere retreat [1,2,3]. These changes have caused widespread environmental degradation, placed increasing stress on public health systems, and contributed to a rise in heat-related illnesses. Under the net-zero commitment established by the Paris Agreement, achieving deep reductions in CO2 emissions has become a central priority of global climate policy. As global warming intensifies and extreme weather events become more frequent, ecosystems are facing mounting pressure, while governments worldwide are under increasing urgency to accelerate energy and industrial transitions. The core challenge is to achieve rapid decarbonization while maintaining climate stability and economic development. In this context, carbon capture and storage (CCS) has emerged as a critical component of deep decarbonization strategies. Its importance is particularly evident in hard-to-abate sectors such as steel, cement, and chemicals, where full decarbonization remains exceptionally challenging due to unavoidable process emissions and technological constraints. Consequently, CCS is increasingly regarded as an indispensable pathway toward carbon neutrality [4], as shown in Figure 2. There are various methods for CCS, with chemical absorption of aqueous amines being the most mature option. However, its large-scale application is constrained by high regeneration energy demand, solvent degradation, and equipment corrosion [5]. Membrane separation and cryogenic processes are attractive in specific niche applications, but low CO2 partial pressures often compromise product purity and economic viability [6,7]. Calcium looping enables rapid high-temperature CO2 capture, yet the substantial energy consumption associated with repeated calcination remains a major unresolved challenge [8].
Figure 1.
Evolution of atmospheric CO2 over the past 800,000 years (800 kyr), major climate change drivers, and greenhouse effect (reproduced with permission from reference [1]).
Figure 2.
Schematic diagram of carbon capture and storage process.
Physical adsorption separation technology has gradually become a research hotspot in the CCS field due to its advantages, such as a wide operating temperature range, low equipment corrosivity, low regeneration energy consumption, and no liquid waste discharge [9,10]. The core of adsorption separation technology lies in the performance of the adsorbent, but traditional adsorbents such as zeolites and activated carbon cannot maintain high performance and stability for CO2 adsorption under complex operating conditions. Among emerging porous materials, MOFs have attracted extensive attention because of their structural diversity and tunability. MOFs are crystalline porous coordination materials constructed from metal ions or clusters and organic linkers, forming highly ordered network structures. Their most notable advantages include exceptionally high specific surface areas and remarkable structural flexibility. Through rational framework design, both topology and local chemical environments can be tuned with near-atomic precision. Nevertheless, early MOFs often performed unsatisfactorily under realistic operating conditions. In humid flue gas, water vapor competes strongly with CO2 for adsorption sites, leading to significant losses in adsorption capacity and selectivity. Moreover, many MOFs exhibit insufficient hydrothermal stability and may undergo irreversible structural degradation during repeated adsorption–desorption cycles. These limitations have driven the field away from the mere discovery of entirely new frameworks toward the targeted modification of existing MOFs to enhance adsorption capacity, selectivity, and structural stability. However, a unified framework for classifying MOF modification strategies from an industrial applicability perspective remains incomplete.
In the paper, the most effective approaches for improving CO2 adsorption performance are categorized into three main strategies: aperture adjustment, doped metal ions, and functional group doping [11,12,13,14,15]. Doped metal ions mainly influence the local electrostatic field, the density of open metal sites, and the polarity of the framework [16]. Functional group doping controls the adsorption microenvironment through acid–base balance, dipole/quadrupole effects, hydrophilicity, and steric spectroscopy. In parallel, theoretical design has become equally important. Although computational screening does not alter the overall classification framework of modification strategies, it increasingly determines which modifications are worth experimental exploration. As a result, theoretical studies have evolved from merely interpreting adsorption mechanisms to guiding high-throughput screening and rational material design [14,15,17,18,19].
2. Synthesis of Metal–Organic Frameworks
2.1. Architectures and Design Objectives
For CO2 capture, MOF synthesis should be discussed in terms of the adsorptive function it enables rather than as a stand-alone preparative exercise [12,20]. Architectures based on one-dimensional metal-oxide chains, such as MOF-74 analogues, are valuable when a high density of open metal sites is desired because those sites can increase CO2 affinity at low pressure [16]. Zr-based clusters, exemplified by UiO-66, UiO-67, MOF-801, and MOF-808, are often selected when hydrothermal and chemical stability are central design requirements [21]. Cu-paddlewheel systems such as HKUST-1 can provide strong adsorption sites and high porosity, but their performance can be strongly influenced by guest activation and stability in humid environments [22,23]. Mesoporous MIL-101-type architectures offer large cages suitable for post-synthetic loading of amines or other functional molecules, but pore blocking becomes a major risk when the grafting density is high [24]. Ti-based MOFs and mixed-ligand systems occupy an intermediate position, where framework stability and chemical tunability are balanced against more complex synthesis and activation requirements [25,26]. MOF-74 derivatives, because of their accessible metal sites, are especially suitable for defect engineering and metal substitution [16,23,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Zr-based materials are more frequently used for post-synthetic functionalization because the underlying cluster remains stable during grafting or ligand exchange. Large-pore frameworks such as MOF-177 and MIL-101(Cr) are useful platforms for amine loading, but the same large-pore character that permits high loading can also dilute confinement effects that would otherwise improve selectivity [24]. For this reason, the most meaningful design question is rarely which MOF has the highest uptake, but instead which architecture best preserves useful pore volume while enabling a targeted change in low-pressure affinity, selectivity, or cyclic stability [21,37,38].
2.2. Synthetic Pathways and Morphological Control
Synthetic route and crystal growth control can influence CO2 capture even before any explicit post-modification is applied, because the route changes crystal size, defect concentration, accessible pore volume, and activation behavior. For Mg-MOF-74-Nx, H4DOBDC (0.674 g, 3.4 mmol) and Mg (NO3)2·6H2O (2.8 g, 10.9 mmol) were added to 300 mL of a DMF/EtOH/H2O mixed solution with a volume ratio of 15:1:1 and stirred until dissolved. Then, 0–2 equivalent amounts of NaAc were added to the mixture, and then the reaction liquid was placed in a crystallization kettle and reacted in an oven at 125 °C for 20 h. Finally, the morphology of Mg-MOF-74-Nx is shown in Figure 3 [27]. Shi et al. further showed that high-gravity synthesis could produce high-quality MOF-74-Co with a BET surface area of 1599 m2 g−1, and the small-sized MOF-74-Co sample with an average size of 78 nm exhibited a CO2 saturation capacity of 298 mg g−1 [31]. These results indicate that the synthesis step can already function as a modification method when it changes defect density or mass-transfer length scales in a controlled way. A similar conclusion arises in Zr-based systems. Kazemi et al. compared sonochemical and solvothermal UiO-66-NH2 and found that the sonochemically synthesized sample reached 3.2 mmol g−1 CO2 at 298 K and 1 bar, compared with 2.3 mmol g−1 for the solvothermal analogue, as shown in Figure 4. Under simulated flue-gas conditions, the same sonochemical sample displayed a CO2/N2 selectivity of 202 and a reported isosteric heat (Qst) above 80 kJ mol−1, while the capacity loss over eight cycles was only 0.6 mmol g−1 [39].
Figure 3.
SEM images of Mg-MOF-74-N0 (a), Mg-MOF-74-N0.5 (b), Mg-MOF-74-N1 (c), and MgMOF-74-N2 (d) (reproduced with permission from reference [28]).
Figure 4.
The preparation of UiO-66-NH2 by the sonochemical method (reproduced with permission from reference [39]).
2.3. Economic Assessment and Feasibility
The industrial-scale process for CO2 adsorption and separation is illustrated in Figure 5. Flue gas first undergoes pretreatment and compression, then enters a multi-bed VSA/PSA unit packed with MOF adsorbents. Through cyclic adsorption, desorption, purge, and pressure equalization, CO2 is selectively captured, producing an N2-rich stream and a concentrated CO2 stream for further purification, compression, or storage. For industrial applications, however, adsorption performance alone is not enough; economic viability and practical feasibility must also be considered.
Figure 5.
Schematic illustration of the industrial-scale MOF-based CO2 adsorption and separation process.
The economics of MOFs for physical CO2 adsorption should be evaluated from the viewpoint of industrial operation rather than equilibrium uptake alone. In practice, the value of an adsorbent depends on the total cost of synthesis, shaping, deployment, regeneration, and replacement during continuous use. A full cost assessment showed that MOF manufacturing still costs about 55 dollars per kilogram at 100 tons per year and 29.5 dollars per kilogram at 1 kiloton per year, whereas costs below 10 dollars per kilogram remain a long-term target that depends on cheaper ligands and more mature large-scale processing. At the process level, the minimum capture cost of MOF-based adsorption for wet flue gas was reported to be 91 versus 104.1 dollars per tonne of CO2 captured at 25 °C and 113.3 versus 146.9 dollars per tonne of CO2 captured at 40 °C under different process configurations [40]. These results show that industrial feasibility depends on the total cost per tonne of CO2 captured rather than on a single adsorption property. Within this framework, the value of aperture adjustment depends on whether pore-size control can be introduced without costly multistep post-synthetic treatment. However, these improvements are meaningful only if the added cost of fluorinated linkers, stricter synthesis control, or reduced pore volume is offset by lower adsorbent inventory or lower energy consumption. Similar considerations apply to structured adsorbents, since industrial systems require mechanically stable forms with high active-material utilization [41]. Metal-ion doping is often more attractive when the dopant can be introduced through a one-pot route while preserving the parent framework. Although such strategies can improve CO2 uptake and selectivity, their industrial value depends on whether the performance gain can offset higher precursor cost and tighter control in large-scale production. Functional-group doping often gives greater low-pressure improvement, but it is usually less economical because grafting or impregnation adds extra reagents and processing steps. Therefore, the most feasible strategy for industrial deployment is not necessarily the one with the highest affinity, but the one that best balances material cost, synthesis simplicity, shaping compatibility, and stable cyclic productivity under realistic conditions.
2.4. Regeneration and Desorption Considerations
For practical CO2 capture, the evaluation of MOFs should extend beyond adsorption capacity and selectivity to include the efficiency of CO2 release during regeneration. In cyclic operation, adsorption affinity, desorption kinetics, and regeneration energy are intrinsically linked, rather than independently optimized. When the interaction between CO2 and the framework is too weak, the working capacity under dilute flue-gas conditions becomes inadequate; when it is too strong, the energy demand for regeneration increases and CO2 desorption becomes less efficient. Accordingly, the objective of material design is not merely to maximize uptake, but to construct a pore environment that balances selective CO2 capture with rapid and reversible release.
This balance is governed to a large extent by the local structure of the adsorption environment. Moderate confinement, continuous diffusion pathways, and a controlled distribution of polar functionalities or open metal sites can sustain strong CO2 affinity without imposing an excessive desorption penalty. By contrast, overly restricted pore channels, excessive functional loading, or highly heterogeneous binding environments may enhance low-pressure uptake while simultaneously hindering mass transfer and increasing regeneration resistance. This trade-off is illustrated by diamine- and tetraamine-appended frameworks. In 2-ampd-Mg2(dobpdc), water-assisted cooperative adsorption enabled a high CO2 cycling capacity of 2.4 mmol g−1 with only a 100 °C temperature swing, demonstrating that a favorable adsorption mechanism can also support efficient regeneration [42]. Similarly, tetraamine-appended MOFs were shown to capture CO2 under humid conditions and to be regenerated directly with steam, indicating that strong adsorption affinity can remain compatible with practical desorption when the regeneration route is properly matched to the adsorption chemistry. CALF-20 offers a further example: as a durable physisorbent, it combines selective CO2 uptake with a low regeneration enthalpy and excellent steam stability over more than 450,000 cycles, highlighting the importance of framework robustness and the avoidance of water-dominated binding environments in maintaining regeneration efficiency.
A more regeneration-oriented perspective was provided by Alivand et al. [43], whose discussion is particularly relevant because it shifts attention from equilibrium capture alone to the structural factors governing CO2 release. They reported a water-dispersible Fe3O4@UiO-66-SO4 nanocatalyst for catalytic solvent regeneration, in which mesoporosity promoted molecular transport and sulfate-derived superacid sites accelerated desorption, reducing the overall energy consumption of CO2 capture by 44.7% with only 0.1 wt.% nanocatalyst while maintaining good recyclability. Although this system belongs to an absorption–regeneration process rather than a conventional fixed-bed physisorption cycle, it underscores a principle that is equally important for adsorption-based MOF design: the practical value of a material depends not only on how strongly it captures CO2, but also on how effectively its framework environment supports diffusion, desorption, low regeneration energy demand, and long-term cyclic efficiency.
3. Modification Methods
Modification is most useful when it is interpreted as a way to redistribute adsorption driving forces rather than as a generic means of improving all performance metrics simultaneously. In MOFs for CO2 capture, capacity, selectivity, Qst, diffusion rate, and regeneration penalty rarely increase together. A given modification may increase CO2 affinity while sacrificing available pore volume or may raise CO2/N2 selectivity by suppressing N2 uptake rather than by increasing CO2 loading. The subsections below therefore focus on how each modification method changes the balance between capacity and selectivity [13,15,21,37,44,45,46].
3.1. Aperture Adjustment
Aperture adjustment is used in an operational sense to include linker substitution, defect engineering, and local pore-environment tuning that alter the effective window size or ultramicroporous confinement experienced by CO2. Di et al. reported a stepwise fluorination strategy in an isoreticular ultramicroporous MOF series to gradually reduce the pore size of DMOFs, where the CO2 uptake at 273 K and 1 bar increased from 4.55 mmol g−1 for DMOF-0F to 4.73 mmol g−1 for DMOF-1F and 4.79 mmol g−1 for DMOF-2F. The more informative changes, however, were in affinity and selectivity. Qst increased from 19.3 to 20.2 and then 23.3 kJ mol−1, while the CO2/N2 selectivity rose from 8.4 to 11.3 and 14.8. At 0.3 bar, CO2/N2 selectivity increased from 12.4 to 14.5 and 21.9 across the same series as shown in Figure 6 [45]. This provides strong evidence that mild aperture narrowing combined with local polarity enhancement can improve low-pressure discrimination without a catastrophic loss of capacity. Defect engineering yields a related but distinct mechanism. By employing a chloride-assisted defect-engineering strategy, An et al. synthesized defect-rich hierarchical porous Mg-MOF-74, in which the weak coordination of Cl− interfered with the regular assembly of Mg2+ and organic linkers, thereby generating ligand defects and hierarchical mesopores. As a result, the Qst increased from 36 to 46 kJ mol−1, the saturated CO2 uptake under ambient pressure rose by approximately 15%, and the CO2/N2 selectivity was enhanced by nearly 20-fold, which was attributed to the combined effects of stronger adsorption sites and accelerated mass transfer through hierarchical pore channels [29]. This is an important point because aperture adjustment is often assumed to mean only pore contraction. In practice, controlled defect creation can simultaneously create stronger local binding and shorter diffusion paths, provided that the framework remains intact and open metal sites remain accessible [47]. That mechanistic balance also determines whether aperture-engineered MOFs can leave the powder stage and enter real adsorption hardware. UTSA-16, whose small cages and narrow pore openings place CO2 in a size-matched confinement regime [48], has already been processed into pellets with 30 wt% loading in activated-carbon composites, giving 75% higher CO2 capacity and about 1000% higher CO2/N2 selectivity than the parent activated carbon pellet while retaining stability toward humid air, SOx, and NOx [49], and has also been translated into 3D-printed monoliths that showed reproducible breakthrough behavior without detectable degradation even near 100% RH [50]. Related process-scale evidence has been obtained for shaped MIL-160(Al), where a three-bed six-step VPSA pilot delivered 90% CO2 purity and 92.7% recovery for a 15/85 vol% CO2/N2 feed, outperforming zeolite 13X under the same conditions [51]. Table 1 summarizes the adsorption performance of representative MOFs developed through aperture adjustment. The main limitation of aperture adjustment is that there is no monotonic relationship between narrower pores and better capture. When the window is narrowed too aggressively, diffusional resistance increases, and the gravimetric capacity can fall even if Qst increases. The fluorinated MOF-801 illustrates the same point from another angle; partial modification can improve selectivity, whereas excessive functional loading can lower capacity because the window becomes too crowded. Aperture adjustment is therefore most convincing when it delivers a moderate shift in ultramicropore environment rather than an extreme reduction in accessible volume. Within aperture adjustment, linker skeleton engineering, window edge functionalization, and flexibility or gate opening control can be distinguished by how they regulate confinement rather than by whether they simply reduce pore size, as shown in Figure 7. Linker skeleton engineering changes the backbone length, shape, or rigidity of the linker and therefore shifts cage dimensions and window cross-section in a predictable way. Its main advantage is that pore contraction is encoded at the framework design stage, so stronger low-pressure CO2 discrimination can be achieved without relying on heavy post-synthetic loading, although excessive shortening can sacrifice pore volume and make the gain strongly topology dependent. Window edge functionalization acts more locally by decorating the aperture perimeter with polar or sterically active groups that adjust the electrostatic environment and the kinetic bottleneck seen by CO2 and competing gases. This route is particularly effective when small polar substituents strengthen quadrupole interactions while preserving diffusional access, but overdecoration can crowd the entrance and suppress useful uptake. Flexibility or gate opening control differs from both strategies because the effective aperture is not fixed but evolves during adsorption. By tuning linker dynamics, intraframework hydrogen bonding, or steric frustration, one can shift the balance between closed, intermediate, and open pore states so that CO2 triggers opening more readily than less interactive gases. In practice, the most useful aperture-adjusted MOFs are therefore those that combine moderate confinement, accessible transport pathways, and a controllable structural response under working pressures. For more examples of aperture adjustment, see Table 2.
Figure 6.
(a) Simulated IAST selectivity of CO2/N2 for DMOF-0F (dark green line), DMOF-1F (pale blue line), and DMOF-2F (orange line) under atmospheric CO2 concentration (i.e., 500 ppm of CO2 to N2). (b) CO2/N2 selectivity of three MOFs based on initial slope method (pale blue) and IAST method (orange). Simulated interactions between the framework and adsorbed CO2 molecules in (c,d) DMOF-0F, (e,f) DMOF-1F, and (g,h) DMOF-2F, where CO2 molecules with no effective interactions are emitted. CH/O(CO2), CF/C(CO2), and p/C(CO2) interactions are shown in pink, red, and light green dotted lines, respectively. (Reproduced with permission from reference [45]).
Table 1.
Adsorption performance of more MOFs with Aperture Adjustment.
| Name | Index | Conditions | Value | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRI-1 | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 1 bar | 71.0 mg/g | [52] |
| Polymer-in-Cage ZIF-8 | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K | 80 | [53] |
| Zn3 MOF | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K, 1.0 bar | 4800 | [54] |
| Cu-F-pymo | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K, 1.0 bar (15:85) | >107 | [55] |
| opt-UiO-66(Zr)-(OH)2 | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 0.15 bar | 2.50 mmol/g | [56] |
| UU-201 | CO2 adsorption | 293 K, 1.0 bar | 3.52 mmol/g | [57] |
| MIL-120(Al)-AP | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K, 0.1 bar (15:85) | 95 | [41] |
| MOF-801(Ce) | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 1.0 bar | 3.30 mmol/g | [58] |
| Zn-TCPP-dmtrz | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 1.0 bar | 2.61 mmol/g | [59] |
| bio-MOF-12 | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K, 1.0 bar (10:90) | 52 | [60] |
| Qc-5-Cu | CO2 adsorption | 298 K, 1.0 bar | 2.48 mmol/g | [61] |
| UiO-66@PAN10 | CO2/N2 Selectivity | 298 K (15:85) | 17 | [62] |
Figure 7.
Three common methods in Aperture Adjustment.
Table 2.
Summary of the improvement of CO2 adsorption performance by aperture adjustment.
| Strategy | Structure Before and After Doping | Index | Values Before and After Doping | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linker skeleton engineering | MFM-136 → MFM-126 | CO2/N2 selectivity | 37.0 → 65.4 | [63] |
| [Zn2(bdc)2(dabco)] → [Zn2(tdc)2(dabco)] | CO2 uptake | 46.0 → 67.4 cm3 g−1 | [64] | |
| [Zn2(bdc)2(dabco)] → [Zn2(sedc)2(dabco)] | CO2/CH4 selectivity | 11.9 → 15.1 | [65] | |
| Window-edge functionalization | DMOF-0F →DMOF-2F | CO2/N2 selectivity | 12.4 → 21.9 | [45] |
| bio-MOF-11 → bio-MOF-12 | CO2/N2 selectivity | 73 → 123 | [60] | |
| Flexibility/gate-opening control | MOF-76-Ce →MOF-76-Ce | CO2 uptake | 2.87 → 17.83 cm3 g−1 | [66] |
| closed-pore Fe(4-PyC)2(OH) → gate-open Fe(4-PyC)2(OH) | CO2/N2 selectivity | 325 → 3131 | [67] | |
| [Co3(OH)2(btca)2] → [Co3(OH)2(btca)2]·0.5DMF | CO2/N2 selectivity | 46.3 → 79.6 | [68] |
3.2. Doped Metal Ions
Doped metal ions alter the adsorption field more directly than aperture adjustment because the dopant can change charge density, polarizability, open-metal-site chemistry, and sometimes the framework topology itself. The usefulness of this route depends strongly on whether the parent framework survives the substitution and whether the dopant remains accessible after activation. Evidence in the recent literature suggests that the benefits of metal doping are real but composition-sensitive, and often restricted to a narrow doping window [23,25,34,35,36,69]. Metal-ion doping is divided into two categories: single-metal doping and multimetallic doping, as shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Two common methods in doped metal ions.
3.2.1. Single-Metal Doping
Only one dopant type or loading is varied on a common framework platform in single-metal-doped systems. In practice, this type of modification can be discussed in terms of two main material-centered categories, namely alkali-metal incorporation for electrostatic-field tuning and single-metal reinforcement of frameworks that already contain strong adsorption sites, while the dopant loading window and process-relevant applicability provide a final criterion for judging their practical value. Song et al. incorporated Li, Na, and K into NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and reported that 1 wt% Li- and Na-doped samples reached CO2 uptakes of 4.60 and 4.57 mmol g−1, respectively, at 293 K and 1 atm, whereas the 1 wt% K-doped sample reached 3.55 mmol g−1. The corresponding BET surface areas increased from 1038 m2 g−1 for pristine NH2-MIL-125(Ti) to 1470, 1451, and 1226 m2 g−1 for the Li-, Na-, and K-containing samples, as shown in Figure 9. The data suggest that alkali incorporation does not act only through simple surface-area increase; the identity of the cation shapes the adsorption field, and the heavier or more space-occupying dopant is not necessarily advantageous [25]. In the same general direction, Zhou et al. reported lithium-doped HKUST-1 with altered CO2 adsorption behavior, supporting the broader proposition that small alkali ions can tune the electrostatic environment of classical MOFs without complete structural replacement [23]. These studies are best understood as electrostatic-field-tuning cases, in which a single light metal species modulates local charge distribution and CO2 affinity without fundamentally reconstructing the parent framework. More pronounced gains have been observed in DOBDC-type frameworks. By contrast, the following studies belong to a second category, where single-metal doping acts mainly by reinforcing adsorption environments that are already strong because of open metal sites or highly accessible polar channels. Cui et al. modified Mg/DOBDC with alkali metals and reported that the best sample, 0.5 K-Mg/DOBDC, reached a dynamic CO2 adsorption capacity of 14.93 mmol g−1 at 0.1 MPa and 298 K, which was 3.44 times that of the parent Mg/DOBDC [32]. Ullah et al. similarly showed that alkali doping of MOF-74 increased BET surface area and pore size, and raised the dynamic CO2 adsorption capacity from 8.9 wt% to 11.68 wt% [33]. These studies suggest that single-metal doping can be especially effective when it reinforces strong adsorption sites already present in frameworks such as MOF-74 or Mg/DOBDC. At the same time, they illustrate the need to distinguish between equilibrium and dynamic data. Dynamic improvement is often more relevant to practical separations, but it can reflect changes in transport and site accessibility in addition to intrinsic thermodynamic affinity. For this reason, the final assessment of single-metal doping should not rely only on uptake enhancement, but also on whether the selected dopant level remains within a useful loading window and whether the modified framework can retain its advantage after shaping, humid-gas exposure, and cyclic operation. From an implementation perspective, however, published evidence for single-metal-doped MOFs still lies closer to engineering demonstration than to full pilot deployment. A Ni/DOBDC pellet from the same open-metal-site family used in metal-site tuning delivered a CO2 capacity of 3.74 mol kg−1 at 0.15 bar and a CO2/N2 selectivity of 38 in fixed-bed breakthrough tests, while still retaining significant performance at 3% RH [70]. Pelletized Mg-MOF-74 was likewise prepared without large capacity loss and dynamically benchmarked against zeolite 13X under low-pressure separation conditions [71]. Together with the CO2/H2O equilibrium and rate measurements reported for HKUST-1 and Ni/DOBDC [72], these results indicate that the practical value of a single dopant is realized only when the improved adsorption field survives pelletization, water competition, and cyclic packed-bed operation. The main caution is that higher dopant loading is not automatically better. Excessive loading can block pores, reduce crystallinity, or create chemically heterogeneous surfaces that complicate regeneration. Excessive single-metal doping can gradually convert a beneficial local perturbation into a structural and transport penalty. At moderate levels, isolated dopant species may strengthen the electrostatic field, improve the accessibility of adsorption sites, or increase the polarity of the pore environment. Once the loading exceeds the tolerance of the parent framework, however, the same dopant can begin to block pore apertures, occupy free volume, and disrupt the uniformity of the internal adsorption field. This often leads to slower CO2 diffusion, reduced site accessibility, and a loss of the balance between affinity and capacity. Overdoping may also lower crystallinity or create chemically heterogeneous regions, making adsorption sites less well defined and regeneration more difficult. In dynamic operation, these effects are even more pronounced because apparent performance then depends not only on equilibrium uptake, but also on mass transfer, water competition, and the ability of the framework to preserve its adsorption advantage after shaping and cycling.
Figure 9.
CO2 adsorption isotherms of NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) at 293 K. (Reproduced with permission from reference [25]).
3.2.2. Multimetallic Doping
Multimetallic doping attempts to combine the benefits of two metal environments within one framework, usually to tune open-metal-site density, adsorption enthalpy, and local channel polarity. Multimetallic doping can be discussed through two closely related categories, namely composition-balanced bimetallic synergy in isostructural frameworks and low-level heterometal substitution that redistributes local adsorption fields while preserving the parent host, whereas the final criterion remains whether the mixed-metal composition stays within a useful substitution window and retains its advantage under process-relevant conditions. This approach is attractive in principle but only convincing when the framework topology is preserved, and the composition is well controlled. Chen et al. synthesized a series of bimetallic NiCo-MOF-74 materials by a microwave-assisted route and reported that Ni1Co1-MOF-74 reached a CO2 uptake of 8.30 mmol g−1 at 273 K and 1 bar. Under the same conditions, Ni-MOF-74 adsorbed 3.99 mmol g−1, Co-MOF-74 adsorbed 5.03 mmol g−1, Ni6Co1-MOF-74 adsorbed 3.62 mmol g−1, and Ni1Co6-MOF-74 adsorbed 6.40 mmol g−1, as shown in Figure 10 [34]. The CO2/N2 selectivity was reported to reach 34. The 1:1 composition outperforms both monometallic and off-stoichiometric bimetallic analogues, so the benefit was not simply more metal diversity but a narrow composition-dependent synergy. These results are representative of the first category, in which two metal environments cooperate most effectively only within a narrow stoichiometric range, indicating that multimetallic doping is valuable not because more metal species are present, but because a balanced combination can optimize the density, accessibility, and polarity of adsorption sites simultaneously.
Figure 10.
CO2 adsorption isotherms of NixCoy-MOF-74 at (a) 273 K and (b) 298 K; CO2 adsorption capacity of NixCoy-MOF-74 at (c) 0.15 bar and (d) 1.0 bar (reproduced with permission from reference [34]).
Recent environmentally oriented syntheses of mixed-metal MOF-74 derivatives lead to the same conclusion. Kazemi et al. reported a 1:1 CoNiMOF-74 with CO2 uptakes of 7.55 mmol g−1 at 298 K and 9.36 mmol g−1 at 278 K, a Qst of 40.7 kJ mol−1, CO2/N2 selectivity around 27.5, and stable performance over 10 cycles [35], together with the simulated-flue-gas selectivity and cycling stability already observed for CoNiMOF-74, these results suggest that the most realistic near-term route for multimetallic MOFs is shaped or packed adsorber validation under cyclic and compositionally relevant conditions. Zhang et al. prepared Nix/Mgx-MOF-74 and found that Ni0.11/Mg0.89-MOF-74 reached 7.02 mmol g−1 CO2 capacity and a CO2/N2 selectivity of 20.50, corresponding to improvements of 10.2% in capacity and 18.02% in selectivity relative to Mg-MOF-74 [36]. A second category is represented by systems in which a limited amount of the second metal is introduced to perturb the parent framework selectively rather than to create a fully equivalent dual-metal lattice, so that improvement arises from controlled redistribution of adsorption enthalpy, open-metal-site character, or channel polarity while structural retention remains the essential requirement. A broader modification strategy combines metal doping with chemical loading. Khan et al. investigated Mg-doped MOF-199 and showed that only up to 2 mol% Mg substitution preserved the framework. The 2 mol% Mg-doped material adsorbed 8.61 mmol g−1 CO2 at 273.15 K and 1 bar, representing a 17.78% increase over pristine MOF-199. When 40 wt% polyethyleneimine was subsequently introduced, CO2 adsorption selectivity increased by 37.90% [69]. Low-level Mg substitution improved uptake while preserving the host, and polymer loading then amplified selectivity. Accordingly, the practical value of multimetallic doping should be judged not only by the highest equilibrium uptake or selectivity, but also by whether the optimized metal ratio remains inside a stable composition window and whether the mixed-metal framework can preserve its adsorption advantage after shaping, repeated cycling, and dynamic separation testing. From an implementation viewpoint, however, the published evidence for multimetallic doping still lies mainly at the level of packed-bed and cyclic demonstrations rather than dedicated pilot plants. A bimetallic Mg-Ca/DOBDC adsorbent reached a dynamic CO2 uptake of 10.92 mmol g−1 at 0.1 MPa and 25 °C, while retaining 82.5% of its adsorption capacity after ten adsorption–desorption cycles, indicating that dual-metal-site tuning can survive repeated fixed-bed operation [73]. Dynamic separation evidence has also been reported for MIL-101(Cr-Al), where the CO2/CH4 dynamic selectivity increased from 1.82 to 4.2 at 15 bar with a space time of 1.12 min [74]. For more examples of multimetallic doping, see Table 3.
Table 3.
Representative examples of multimetallic doping in MOFs for CO2 adsorption and separation.
| Strategy | Structure Before and After Doping | Values Before and After Doping | Index | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composition-balanced bimetallic synergy | Ni-MOF-74 → Ni1Co1-MOF-74 | 3.99 → 8.30 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [34] |
| MIL-100(Fe) → MIL-100(Fe, Al) | 2.60 → 3.27 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [75] | |
| ZIF-8-1000 → Zn/Ni-ZIF-8-1000 | 102 → 124 | CO2/N2 selectivity | [76] | |
| CPM-200-In/Mg → CPM-200-Fe/Mg | 190.9 → 207.6 cm3 g−1 | CO2 uptake | [77] | |
| Ce-BTC → CuCe-BTC-1:2 | 0.10 → 0.74 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [78] | |
| Heterometal substitution | MIL-96(Al) → MIL-96(Al)-Ca1 | 8.09 → 10.22 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [79] |
| MIL-101(Cr) → MIL-101(Cr-Al) | 1.82 → 4.2 | CO2/CH4 selectivity | [67] | |
| Zn-MOF → Zn Ce-MOF | 0.66 → 0.74 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [80] | |
| HKUST-1(Cu) → HKUST-1(Cu, Mg) | 12.02 → 16.66 | CO2/CH4 selectivity | [81] | |
| UiO-66(Zr) → Ti-exchanged UiO-66 | 2.3 → 4.0 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [82] | |
| MOF-5 → Cu0.05-MOF-5 | 3.52 → 4.61 mmol g−1 | CO2 uptake | [83] |
3.3. Functional Group Doping
Functional-group doping is one of the broadest and most heavily used strategies in MOF-based CO2 capture because it can be performed by linker design, post-synthetic grafting, covalent anchoring, or guest loading. This category refers to deliberate introduction of chemical moieties that reshape the adsorption microenvironment by changing local polarity, acid–base character, hydrogen-bonding capacity, steric hindrance, or hydrophobicity. The evidence base is uneven across functional-group classes. Amines are strongly supported by quantitative low-pressure data. Oxygen-containing groups usually produce more moderate gains unless they are part of a multistep architecture, as shown in Figure 11.
Figure 11.
Four common methods in functional group doping.
3.3.1. Amine
Amine modification remains the most consistently validated route for improving low-pressure CO2 capture because it can introduce specific acid–base interactions and, in some cases, chemisorption-like behavior. The quantitative effect depends strongly on amine size, loading level, and pore geometry. Mutyala et al. incorporated tetraethylenepentamine into UiO-66 and found that 30TEPA/UiO-66 adsorbed 3.70 mmol g−1 CO2 at 348 K and 1 bar. The value is notable because it was achieved under relatively elevated temperatures, where physisorption-dominated MOFs often lose capacity [84]. Pirzadeh et al. compared aminated UiO-66 and Cu3(BTC)2 and reported CO2 uptakes of 3.32 and 3.86 mmol g−1, respectively, at 298 K and 1 bar. Under a 15/85 vol% CO2/N2 mixture, the CO2/N2 selectivities were 120 for NH2-UiO-66 and 53 for NH2-Cu3(BTC)2, while NH2-Cu3(BTC)2 showed a Qst of 43 kJ mol−1 [85]. These results indicate that amination does not act uniformly across frameworks; the same functional group can give higher uptake on one platform and higher selectivity on another, depending on pore architecture and site accessibility. Large-pore frameworks make it possible to increase amine loading, but the gain is useful only if pore blocking remains limited. Gaikwad et al. functionalized MOF-177 with TEPA and showed that 20% TEPA-MOF-177 increased the CO2 capacity by 4.8 times relative to the parent at 298 K, while reaching 4.6 mmol g−1 at 328 K. The high-temperature performance is especially important because it suggests that strong amine-CO2 interactions compensated for the loss of weak physisorption that would otherwise occur at elevated temperature [86]. A similar principle was demonstrated by Jun et al. in MOF-808 functionalized with ethyleneamines. The MOF-808-TEPA sample adsorbed about 2.5 times as much CO2 as pristine MOF-808 at 15 kPa and delivered a CO2/N2 selectivity of 256, about seven times that of the parent [87]. The study provides strong evidence that polyamine loading is particularly effective under low-pressure conditions relevant to flue gas. Recent Zr-based studies reinforce the same point while also clarifying the limits of overfunctionalization. Nam et al. functionalized MOF-808 through an EDTA-assisted route followed by trisamine introduction and reported that MOF808-EDTA-TREN reached a CO2/N2 selectivity of 519 at 100 kPa, with stable performance over five runs. But a moderate degree of TREN functionalization is optimal, because increasing TREN loading raises the density of amino sites and strengthens low-pressure CO2 capture, excessive grafting markedly reduces BET surface area and pore volume from 2087 m2 g−1 and 0.70 cm3 g−1 for pristine MOF-808 to 118 m2 g−1 and 0.09 cm3 g−1 for MOF808-EDTA-TREN(0.5), which severely limits the CO2 adsorption environment of the skeleton [88]. On the higher-pressure side, Esfahani et al. modified Zr-BTC with NH2-containing mixed ligands and observed a maximum equilibrium CO2 capacity of 369.11 mg g−1 at 298 K and 9 bar for the sample containing 20 wt% NH2. The same modification increased specific surface area and pore volume by 15% and 6%, respectively, and after 15 cycles, the capacity decreased only from 279.05 to 257.56 mg g−1, as shown in Figure 12 [89].
Figure 12.
Regenerability of MH-20% sample for consecutive CO2 adsorption process (reproduced with permission from reference [89]).
Practical translation of amine-functionalized MOFs has also begun to move beyond powder tests, although fully dedicated pilot-scale reports remain limited. Monolith-supported mmen-Mg2(dobpdc) delivered CO2 uptakes of 2.37 mmol g−1 for 10% CO2 and 2.88 mmol g−1 for pure CO2, with excellent multicycle performance in a scalable low-pressure-drop honeycomb contactor [90]. A related 2-ampd-Mg2(dobpdc)/PES hollow-fiber module contained up to 70 wt% MOF and preserved 98% of the pure-MOF uptake while showing breakthrough behavior consistent with the parent framework and reduced pressure drop. At the process level, tetraamine-appended frameworks were further shown to capture CO2 efficiently under humid natural-gas-flue-gas conditions and could be regenerated directly with steam, while subsequent fixed-bed process analysis for an approximately 600 MW NGCC plant indicated that such materials can be embedded into temperature-swing adsorption systems with capture costs only about 30% higher than solvent capture under realistic heat-recovery assumptions [91].
Aminosilane-functionalized Ti-based MOFs and aminosilane-functionalized UiO-67 have also been reported to improve selective CO2 capture, but the mechanistic value of these studies lies less in reporting the highest absolute uptake and more in showing that tether length, grafting mode, and the ratio of amine to free pore volume are decisive. Across the recent literature, the strongest general conclusion is that amines are most effective for low-pressure capture when they are introduced at a loading that increases site-specific affinity without collapsing diffusional access. Very high Qst values can be advantageous for selectivity, but they may impose a larger regeneration penalty. Thus, the best-performing amine-modified MOFs are not necessarily those with the highest amine loading, but rather those in which amine accessibility and residual pore connectivity remain balanced.
3.3.2. Oxygen-Containing Functional Groups
Compared with amines, oxygen-containing groups usually deliver more moderate but still useful changes in CO2 adsorption because they can increase local polarity, create hydrogen-bond acceptor sites, and alter pore wetting behavior without always causing the strong pore blocking associated with bulky polyamines. MFM-300(VIII) contains bridging –OH groups lining the pore channels. The –OH groups strengthen host–guest interactions by providing a specific hydrogen-bonding site for CO2 and increasing the adsorption enthalpy, while also slightly narrowing the pore environment to favor stronger confinement. As a result, MFM-300(VIII) shows a CO2 uptake of 6.0 mmol g−1 at 298 K and 1 bar, whereas MFM-300(VIV) adsorbs only 3.54 mmol g−1 under the same conditions, corresponding to a 41% increase. At 273 K and 1 bar, the uptake also rises from 6.56 to 8.6 mmol g−1, an improvement of about 31%. The Qst of adsorption is higher for the hydroxyl-bearing material, confirming that pore hydroxylation enhances CO2 affinity and overall adsorption performance [92]. Park et al. modified MOF-808 stepwise and reported CO2/N2 selectivities of 40 for pristine MOF-808, 48 for MOF-808-EDTA, 19 for MOF-808-EDTA-ED, and 197 for the reduced derivative MOF-808-EDTA-ED-R, measured at 298 K and 1 bar. Clearly, the adsorption performance improved and then declined again because the functionalization of oxygen-rich EDTA provides numerous carboxyl-related sites, enhancing electron transfer between the framework and maintaining acid–base balance at the adsorption sites, thus providing an excellent adsorption environment for CO2 separation. However, not every additional functionalization is beneficial. The intermediate product MOF-808-EDTA-ED forms a high concentration of amide groups, leading to a decrease in the concentration of basic sites. Inappropriate chemicals can reduce releasable porosity or create unfavorable adsorption environments. The final product, MOF-808-EDTA-ED-R, transforms into an amine-functionalized material, significantly improving separation performance, as shown in Table 4 [93]. Oxygen-containing groups are therefore better understood as controlled polar modifiers than as inherently strong CO2-binding sites. At the implementation level, oxygen-containing pore environments appear attractive precisely because they usually preserve moderate binding strength and therefore avoid the excessive regeneration penalty often associated with stronger chemisorptive routes. Dedicated pilot-scale reports for this subclass are still scarce, but hydroxyl-lined frameworks have already moved into realistic packed-bed demonstrations. MFM-300(Fe), in which μ2-OH groups are preferred CO2 binding sites, was synthesized on a 1000-fold larger scale and achieved packed-bed CO2/N2 breakthrough separation with a selectivity of 21.6. Earlier, MIL-53(Al, PVA) pellets also demonstrated effective CO2/CH4 column separation, showing that hydroxyl-containing frameworks can be shaped without losing their practical adsorption function [94]. These results suggest that oxygen-containing functionalization is especially relevant when the target is not the highest possible affinity, but a robust adsorbent that can be pelletized, cycled, and integrated into fixed-bed contactors with acceptable mass transfer and regeneration behavior.
Table 4.
Performances of some selected M808s in CO2 adsorptions at 298 K. (Reproduced with permission from reference [93].)
| Material | CO2 Uptake (mmol/g) | Relative Adsorption Ratio * | CO2/N2
Selectivity ** |
CO2/N2
Selectivity ** |
−ΔHst (kJ/mol) *** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at 0.15 atm | at 1.0 atm | at 0.15 atm | at 1.0 atm | |||
| M808 | 0.29 | 1.38 | 0.21 | 72 | 40 | 34 |
| M808-EDTA | 0.33 | 1.46 | 0.23 | 80 | 48 | 40 |
| M808-EDTA-ED(0.6) | 0.22 | 1.23 | 0.18 | – | – | – |
| M808-EDTA-ED(1.2) | 0.13 | 0.63 | 0.2 | 23 | 19 | 24 |
| M808-EDTA-ED(1.8) | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.36 | – | – | – |
| M808-EDTA-ED-R(1.2) | 0.62 | 1.62 | 0.38 | 431 | 197 | 48 |
* Relative ratio of adsorption of 0.15 atm/1.0 atm. ** Calculated by IAST (for CO2:N2 = 0.15:0.75, at 1.0 atm and 298 K). *** Isosteric heat of adsorption at zero-coverage (calculated from the isotherms at 273, 288, 298 and 303 K).
The broader evidence base reviewed by Lee et al. similarly suggests that non-amine polar groups can increase adsorption capacity, selectivity, or Qst, but the gain is often smaller than that of well-positioned amines and more sensitive to framework geometry. In many cases, oxygen-containing groups serve best as enabling elements for multistep modification, for example, by anchoring secondary functionalities or stabilizing a post-synthetic transformation [44]. That interpretation is consistent with the MOF-808 series above, where the oxygen-rich intermediate was beneficial but not transformative on its own. For this reason, oxygen-containing functionalization should be regarded as a moderate-strength strategy, especially valuable when a milder increase in affinity is preferred over the stronger regeneration penalty that can accompany polyamine loading.
3.3.3. Halogen Incorporation
Halogen incorporation, especially fluorination, has become one of the most persuasive non-amine strategies for increasing CO2 selectivity in MOFs. Halogen-modified MOFs tend to exhibit stronger electrostatic or dipole-quadrupole interactions with CO2, altering electronic properties while enhancing hydrophobicity. Furthermore, the introduction of halogens can also modulate pore characteristics. In the isoreticular fluorinated DMOF series reported by Di et al., stepwise fluorination increased the CO2 uptake only modestly from 4.55 to 4.79 mmol g−1 at 273 K and 1 bar, but it increased Qst from 19.3 to 23.3 kJ mol−1 and raised CO2/N2 selectivity at 0.3 bar from 12.4 to 21.9, as shown in Table 5 [45]. This pattern is important because it shows that fluorination may be more valuable for low-pressure discrimination than for maximizing total gravimetric capacity. Venturi et al. reached a similar conclusion in fluorinated MOF-801 analogues. By increasing the incorporation of fluorinated units, the authors raised Qst up to 30 kJ mol−1 and obtained a CO2/N2 selectivity of 41 in the partially fluorinated analogue PF-MOF. However, complete fluorination reduced the adsorption capacity because the bulky fluorinated moiety narrowed the pore windows too strongly; at the same time, the interaction between CO2 and hydrogen bonds led to changes in the optimal adsorption site of CO2-MOF [46]. It demonstrates both the benefit and the limit of halogen incorporation within one material family. Fluorination is most effective when it enhances local electrostatics without imposing excessive steric crowding. In addition to fluorination, to address the bulky disadvantage of MOFs, Han et al. incorporated Cu-F/Cl/Br-Cu into LNU-H1/2/3, as shown in Figure 13. At the same time, Cu-F/Cl/Br-Cu replaced the original organic ligands, acting as a blocker to eliminate the one-dimensional channels with scarce polar sites, thus forming single-type-cage cage-base MOFs [95]. Halogen incorporation in MOFs often coexists with aperture adjustment, because halogen substituents not only modify the pore-surface polarity and electronic environment but also alter the effective window size and channel shape. This dual effect can synergistically enhance CO2 adsorption by strengthening host–guest interactions while simultaneously improving molecular sieving and diffusion selectivity.
Table 5.
BET surface area (SBET), total pore volume (Vtotal), isosteric heat of adsorption (Qst), and CO2/N2 selectivity (reproduced with permission from reference [45]).
| SBET a (m2 g−1) | Vtotal b (cm3 g−1) | Qst (kJ mol−1) | Selectivity (Initial Slope) | Selectivity c (IAST) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMOF-0F | 949 | 0.41 | 19.3 | 8.4 | 12.4 |
| DMOF-1F | 1123 | 0.48 | 20.2 | 11.3 | 14.5 |
| DMOF-2F | 1225 | 0.48 | 23.3 | 14.8 | 21.9 |
a BET surface area. b Total pore volume. c Values at 0.3 bar.
Figure 13.
Assembly process of LNU-H1, LNU-H2, and LNU-H3. (a) Every two teeth in the hexadentate ligand are twisted around N and bind to Cu2+ cations and X− (X = F, Cl, and Br) anions. (b) The coordination environment of mononuclear copper and fluorine atoms and the assembled 12-hedral cage. (c) An infinitely extended 3D network assembled from individual cages. (d) Simplified topological graph of LNU-H1, LNU-H2, and LNU-H3. (Reproduced with permission from reference [95]).
3.3.4. Alkyl Chains and Bulky Non-Polar Groups
In principle, nonpolar groups can indirectly improve selectivity by altering pore constraint, restricting the window for N2 molecules to enter the pore, or controlling the configuration of adjacent polar groups, but they generally do not provide strong interactions with CO2 [44,96]. Lee et al. functionalized MIL-101(Cr), where alkyl-NH2, aryl-NH2, -SO3H, and -NO2 groups were compared under matched conditions. The reported performance order was alkyl-NH2 > -SO3H > aryl-NH2 > -NO2, indicating that local chemical environment and flexibility matter more than nominal functional-group identity alone. However, even the excellent performance of alkyl-NH2 failed to isolate a purely nonpolar effect, as amines still dominated as the primary adsorbent, as shown in Figure 14 [24]. Studies on functionalized MOF-177 also show that strongly polar groups are generally superior to -CH3 substitution in enhancing CO2 affinity [96]. The incorporation of alkyl chains and bulky non-polar substituents into metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) has been increasingly recognized as an effective molecular design strategy for regulating framework hydrophobicity. A representative example is provided by NMOF-1 decorated with exposed octadecyl chains, in which the long alkyl moieties substantially reduce the surface free energy and impart pronounced superhydrophobicity [97]. Importantly, the role of alkyl substitution is not limited to surface hydrophobization. Increasing evidence suggests that alkyl side chains can also profoundly affect framework assembly. For example, systematic extension of alkyl substituents has been shown to progressively increase the water contact angle from 136.9° to 155.0°, while the introduction of an n-octyl group can even drive a transformation from a three-dimensional framework to a two-dimensional layered structure [98]. A similar rationale applies to the use of bulky non-polar groups, whose steric and hydrophobic effects can further diversify pore environments. MOFs constructed from 5-tert-butylisophthalic acid have been reported to exhibit coexisting hydrophilic and hydrophobic channels, where the tert-butyl group serves as a sterically demanding hydrophobic unit [99]. These studies collectively emphasize that alkyl chain engineering and bulky nonpolar functionalization are versatile approaches for tuning the hydrophobicity, pore chemistry, and CO2 adsorption behavior of MOFs under humid conditions.
Figure 14.
Plausible mechanisms of CO2 adsorption over (a) -SO3H, (b) -NO2, (c) aryl-NH2, and (d) alkyl-NH2 (reproduced with permission from reference [24]).
3.4. Synergistic Effects
Synergistic effects between metal doping or metal-node chemistry and functional groups are increasingly recognized as an effective strategy for improving CO2 physisorption and separation in MOFs. This is because the adsorption field is often governed by the combined influence of metal polarity, local coordination environment, and functional-group distribution, rather than by either factor alone. A simple example is that the same amino group can behave differently on different framework nodes. In aminated UiO-66 and Cu3(BTC)2, the CO2 uptakes at 298 K and 1 bar were 3.32 and 3.86 mmol g−1, respectively, but the CO2/N2 selectivities under a 15/85 vol% mixture were 120 for NH2-UiO-66 and 53 for NH2-Cu3(BTC)2, while NH2-Cu3(BTC)2 showed the highest Qst of 43 kJ mol−1 [85]. These results show that the effect of a functional group depends strongly on the metal node and the surrounding pore environment.
More direct synergy has been reported when functional groups are introduced through reactive hydroxyl sites on metal clusters. In MOF-808, ethyleneamines were anchored through the μ-OH environment of the Zr cluster, and MOF-808-TEPA showed an IAST CO2/N2 selectivity of 256, about seven times that of pristine MOF-808, together with a CO2 uptake about 2.5 times higher at 15 kPa. A similar effect was observed in UiO-67, where aminosilanes introduced through μ-OH sites on the Zr node gave an IAST CO2/N2 selectivity of 407 at 100 kPa, 163 times that of pristine UiO-67, while the CO2 uptake at 15 kPa increased by about 2.6 times [100]. In these systems, the metal cluster not only supports the framework but also determines the accessibility and effective basicity of the amino groups.
Synergy is also seen when oxygen-containing groups act as secondary anchors or electronic modifiers near metal clusters. In the MOF-808 series, EDTA alone increased the CO2/N2 selectivity from 40 to 48, whereas reduced MOF-808-EDTA-ED-R reached 197, indicating stronger cooperation between oxygen-rich anchoring groups and newly formed amine sites. Nam et al. further showed that MOF808-EDTA-TREN reached a CO2/N2 selectivity of 519 at 100 kPa, although excessive functionalization greatly reduced the BET surface area and pore volume. A combined strategy was also reported for Mg-doped MOF-199, where Mg substitution increased CO2 uptake and subsequent polyethyleneimine loading further improved selectivity. Even without external amines, embedded functional groups can cooperate with metal centers, as shown in MFM-300(VIII), where bridging hydroxyl groups and V centers together strengthened CO2 binding. Overall, the strongest synergistic effects are currently found in systems combining moderate metal modification with amino or oxygen-containing groups, while comparable data for halogen–metal co-modification remain limited.
4. Computational Screening
Computational screening has evolved from a ranking exercise based mainly on single-component uptake and selectivity into a more demanding workflow that increasingly incorporates stability, humidity, and process-level relevance. Earlier high-throughput screening of experimental and hypothetical MOFs established the methodological basis, grand canonical Monte Carlo calculations enabled large-scale ranking, and early screening studies clarified that uptake alone is a poor decision variable. This remains an important point for modification studies. A modification that increases Qst or low-pressure uptake may not improve working capacity or productivity in a pressure-swing process. Computational screening is therefore most useful when it translates local modifications into process-relevant descriptors rather than into a single scalar performance value [14,15,19,37,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108].
Recent studies show a clear methodological refinement. Zhang et al. used machine learning to identify geometric targets for humid-condition CO2 capture and reported an optimal characteristic pore diameter around 14.18 Å and an accessible surface area around 1750 m2 g−1 [109], indicating that humid-flue-gas performance is associated with intermediate rather than extreme porosity. Kancharlapalli and Snurr extended this logic to wet flue gas through a multiscale screening strategy based on CoRE-MOF-2019 [18]. Mohamed et al. then moved the field further by integrating thermodynamic, mechanical, thermal, and activation stability metrics with high-throughput screening of hypothetical MOFs. In their study of 15,219 hMOFs, 148 candidates met the initial thresholds of CO2 uptake ≥4 mmol g−1 and CO2/N2 selectivity ≥200, and the highest CO2 uptake among those top-performing hMOFs was 8.47 mmol g−1 [19]. Screening studies now increasingly target realistic wet flue gas, identify hydrophobic or stability-compatible adsorption environments, and combine molecular simulation with data-driven models. Reviews by Demir et al. and Wang and Zhou emphasize that the next useful layer is process-aware design: screening should account for framework flexibility, defect chemistry, water competition, and the possibility that post-synthetic modification changes not only equilibrium loading but also diffusion and regenerability. Computational screening is most informative when it predicts which modification class is likely to help on a specific platform—for example, which pore diameter window benefits fluorination, which metal pair is likely to preserve topology in MOF-74, or what amine loading can be tolerated before pore blocking outweighs affinity gains. Hossein summarized recent research works on MD, GCMC, and DFT simulations of CO2 capture by MOFs [110].
5. Current Challenges and Future Perspectives
Despite rapid progress in tailoring MOFs for CO2 physisorption, the main challenge is no longer simply to maximize equilibrium uptake under ideal dry conditions, but to maintain working capacity, selectivity, and fast mass transfer under humid and compositionally complex gas streams. Many laboratory studies still evaluate adsorption mainly on activated powders under single-component or idealized binary conditions. In practice, however, successful separation requires reproducible synthesis, structured adsorbents, multicomponent breakthrough validation, effective heat management, and stable cyclic operation in the presence of water vapor. For physisorption-based CO2 separation, a moderate increase in host–guest affinity is valuable only if it does not greatly reduce pore accessibility, adsorption kinetics, or regeneration efficiency. Future experiments should therefore move beyond static uptake screening and focus more on standardized evaluation of working capacity, productivity, hydrothermal stability, shaping compatibility, and long-term cyclic durability. Recent progress in scalable and water-tolerant physisorbents is encouraging, but their practical value will depend on whether these properties can be preserved after pelletization, binder addition, and continuous operation under realistic flue-gas conditions [21].
From a theoretical perspective, materials are still often ranked by equilibrium uptake or ideal selectivity, whereas industrial separation is controlled by many coupled factors, including water competition, defect chemistry, framework flexibility, thermal effects, and process design. High-throughput screening and machine learning have pushed the field toward more realistic descriptors, but a clear gap remains between theory and experiment because simulations often assume ideal crystals, while real materials are defective, partially activated, and limited by shaping and cost [14]. The next stage should rely on a closed-loop workflow in which molecular simulation, process modeling, and experimental synthesis are integrated iteratively rather than treated separately. In this framework, the most useful models will not simply identify materials with the highest uptake, but predict frameworks that are synthetically accessible, mechanically robust, humidity-tolerant, and still competitive after shaping and under process-relevant conditions.
After industrial translation, economics will become the decisive factor. Process studies and production-cost analyses show that future success will depend less on record uptake values and more on whether a physisorbent can be made from low-cost precursors, processed into robust forms, and regenerated with low energy penalty while maintaining stable CO2/N2 separation performance [40]. Overall, recent advances in scalable physisorbents, robust Al-based frameworks, and process-integrated studies suggest that MOF-based CO2 physical separation is moving from proof-of-concept research toward practical deployment.
6. Conclusions
This review shows that aperture adjustment, metal-ion doping, and functional-group incorporation can each improve uptake or selectivity, but the gains are rarely independent. Stronger host–guest interactions often reduce accessible pore volume, slow diffusion, or raise regeneration energy. Accordingly, modified MOFs should not only be judged based on equilibrium capacity or equal heat dissipation, but also on working capacity, adsorption kinetics, cycle stability, water resistance, and energy consumption under real flue gas conditions. Aperture adjustment is best when moderate constraints and a favorable local electrostatic environment are introduced without significantly clogging the pores. Defect engineering can also be beneficial, but only within a narrow window in which additional binding sites are created without compromising crystallinity or framework robustness. Metal-ion doping shows particular promise in MOF-74 and related families, where controlled substitution can tune open-metal-site chemistry and channel polarity. Its benefit, however, depends on strict compositional control and retention of the parent structure. Functional-group incorporation, especially amine modification, remains the most reliable strategy for low-partial-pressure CO2 capture because it can enhance the interaction between CO2 and the skeleton. The main challenge is to avoid excessive loading, which can cause pore blocking, slower diffusion, and higher regeneration penalties, especially under humid and cyclic operation. Computational screening should be improved to enhance its practicality by incorporating framework flexibility, water competition, thermal stability, and synthetic feasibility. The most useful candidates for practical deployment will not necessarily be those with the highest reported uptake, but those that combine robust structure, reproducible synthesis, low regeneration cost, and stable performance over repeated cycles. This review proposes a clear MOF modification classification framework, providing guidance for the theoretical design of MOFs to improve CO2 adsorption capacity.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22178039) and the Special Foundation for Key Fields of Colleges and Universities in Guangdong Province (2021ZDZX4094, 2023ZDZX3091).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Wang F., Harindintwali J.D., Wei K., Shan Y., Mi Z., Costello M.J., Grunwald S., Feng Z., Wang F., Guo Y., et al. Climate Change: Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation. Innov. Geosci. 2023;1:100015. doi: 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee H., Calvin K., Dasgupta D., Krinner G., Mukherji A., Thorne P.W., Trisos C., Romero J., Aldunce P., Barrett K., et al. Climate Change 2023. IPCC; Geneva, Switzerland: 2023. Synthesis Report. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Friedlingstein P., O’Sullivan M., Jones M.W., Andrew R.M., Hauck J., Landschützer P., Le Quéré C., Li H., Luijkx I.T., Olsen A., et al. Global Carbon Budget 2024. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2025;17:965–1039. doi: 10.5194/essd-17-965-2025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shu D.Y., Deutz S., Winter B.A., Baumgärtner N., Leenders L., Bardow A. The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage to Achieve Net-Zero Energy Systems: Trade-Offs between Economics and the Environment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023;178:113246. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113246. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yamada H. Amine-Based Capture of CO2 for Utilization and Storage. Polym. J. 2020;53:93–102. doi: 10.1038/s41428-020-00400-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hou R., Fong C., Freeman B.D., Hill M.R., Xie Z. Current Status and Advances in Membrane Technology for Carbon Capture. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022;300:121863. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121863. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Song C., Liu Q., Deng S., Li H., Kitamura Y. Cryogenic-Based CO2 Capture Technologies: State-of-the-Art Developments and Current Challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019;101:265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Blamey J., Anthony E.J., Wang J., Fennell P.S. The Calcium Looping Cycle for Large-Scale CO2 Capture. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010;36:260–279. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2009.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Raganati F., Miccio F., Ammendola P. Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide for Post-Combustion Capture: A Review. Energy Fuels. 2021;35:12845–12868. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tao Z., Tian Y., Wu W., Liu Z., Fu W., Kung C.-W., Shang J. Development of Zeolite Adsorbents for CO2 Separation in Achieving Carbon Neutrality. npj Mater. Sustain. 2024;2:20. doi: 10.1038/s44296-024-00023-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ding M., Flaig R.W., Jiang H.L., Yaghi O.M. Carbon Capture and Conversion Using Metal-Organic Frameworks and Mof-Based Materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48:2783–2828. doi: 10.1039/c8cs00829a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sun M., Wang X., Gao F., Xu M., Fan W., Xu B., Sun D. Synthesis Strategies of Metal-Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture. Microstructures. 2023;3:2023032. doi: 10.20517/microstructures.2023.32. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ding M., Rong W., Wang Y., Kong S., Yao J. Pore Engineering of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Boosting Low-Pressure CO2 Capture. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023;11:25784–25802. doi: 10.1039/D3TA05413F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Demir H., Daglar H., Gulbalkan H.C., Aksu G.O., Keskin S. Recent Advances in Computational Modeling of Mofs: From Molecular Simulations to Machine Learning. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023;484:215112. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang Z., Zhou T. Computer-Aided Metal–Organic Framework Screening and Design Approaches toward Efficient Carbon Capture Processes. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2025;10:1005–1023. doi: 10.1039/D5ME00075K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Choe J.H., Kim H., Hong C.S. Mof-74 Type Variants for CO2 Capture. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021;5:5172–5185. doi: 10.1039/D1QM00205H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chung Y.G., Haldoupis E., Bucior B.J., Haranczyk M., Lee S., Zhang H., Vogiatzis K.D., Milisavljevic M., Ling S., Camp J.S., et al. Advances, Updates, and Analytics for the Computation-Ready, Experimental Metal–Organic Framework Database: Core Mof 2019. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2019;64:5985–5998. doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.9b00835. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kancharlapalli S., Snurr R.Q. High-Throughput Screening of the Core-Mof-2019 Database for CO2 Capture from Wet Flue Gas: A Multi-Scale Modeling Strategy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15:28084–28092. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c04079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mohamed S.A., Zhao D., Jiang J. Integrating Stability Metrics with High-Throughput Computational Screening of Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture. Commun. Mater. 2023;4:79. doi: 10.1038/s43246-023-00409-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mahajan S., Lahtinen M. Recent Progress in Metal-Organic Frameworks (Mofs) for CO2 Capture at Different Pressures. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022;10:108930. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108930. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Siegelman R.L., Kim E.J., Long J.R. Porous Materials for Carbon Dioxide Separations. Nat. Mater. 2021;20:1060–1072. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li J.R., Sculley J., Zhou H.C. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Separations. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:869–932. doi: 10.1021/cr200190s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhou L., Niu Z., Jin X., Tang L., Zhu L. Effect of Lithium Doping on the Structures and CO2 Adsorption Properties of Metal-Organic Frameworks Hkust-1. ChemistrySelect. 2018;3:12865–12870. doi: 10.1002/slct.201803164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee G., Jhung S.H. CO2 Capture Using Functionalized Mil-101(Cr) Metal–Organic Frameworks: Functionality Nanoarchitectonics of Nanospace for CO2 Adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025;354:129514. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129514. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Song L., Xue C., Xia H., Qiu S., Sun L., Chen H. Effects of Alkali Metal (Li, Na, and K) Incorporation in NH2-Mil125Ti on the Performance of CO2 Adsorption. Materials. 2019;12:844. doi: 10.3390/ma12060844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huang Z., Ying L., Gong F., Lu J., Wang W., Ding J., Yan J. Aminosilane-Functionalized Ti-Based Metal–Organic Framework for Efficient and Selective CO2 Adsorption. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023;11:109739. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ma M., Zhou A., Hong T., Jia X., Liu M. Tailored Porous Structure and CO2 Adsorption Capacity of Mg-Mof-74 Via Solvent Polarity Regulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;476:146845. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.146845. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Xin C., Hou S., Yu L., Zhou X., Fu Y., Yang X., Sun W., Yang F., Wang X., Liu L. Controlled Synthesis of Mg-Mof-74 and Its CO2 Adsorption in Flue Gas. Coatings. 2024;14:383. doi: 10.3390/coatings14040383. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.An H., Tian W., Lu X., Yuan H., Yang L., Zhang H., Shen H., Bai H. Boosting the CO2 Adsorption Performance by Defect-Rich Hierarchical Porous Mg-Mof-74. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;469:144052. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kazemi A., Pordsari M.A., Tamtaji M., Zainali F., Keshavarz S., Baesmat H., Manteghi F., Ghaemi A., Rohani S., Goddard W.A., III Eco-Friendly Synthesis and Morphology Control of Mof-74 for Exceptional CO2 Capture Performance with Dft Validation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025;361:131328. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.131328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shi X.-R., Qiao M., Wei Y., Yun L.-X., Wang J.-X., Chen J.-F. Green, Efficient and Controllable Synthesis of High-Quality Mof-74 with High Gravity Technology. Green Chem. 2024;26:6209–6218. doi: 10.1039/d4gc01350f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cui S., Gu Y., Shao Y., Zhong W. Experimental Research of Alkali Metals Modified Mg/Dobdc Metal Organic Framework as High Capacity CO2 Adsorbent. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024;331:125471. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125471. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ullah S., Bustam M.A., Sagir M., Raza M.R., Nawaz S., Assiri M.A., Al-Sehemi A.G., Mukhtar A., Feng C.L., Ayoub M. Synthesis and Doping of Alkali Metals on Mof-74 for CO2 and CH4 Pure and Binary Mixtures Adsorption. Gas Sci. Eng. 2025;134:205502. doi: 10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen C., Kosari M., Jing M., He C. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Bimetallic Nico-Mof-74 with Enhanced Open Metal Site for Efficient CO2 Capture. Environ. Funct. Mater. 2022;1:253–266. doi: 10.1016/j.efmat.2023.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kazemi A., Pordsari M.A., Tamtaji M., Manteghi F., Ghaemi A., Rohani S., Goddard W.A. Environmentally Friendly Synthesis and Morphology Engineering of Mixed-Metal Mof for Outstanding CO2 Capture Efficiency. Chem. Eng. J. 2025;505:158951. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.158951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang X., Li G., Hong M., Ban H., Yang L., Liu X., Li F., Matus E.V., Li C., Li L. Development of Ni/Mg1-Mof-74 for Highly Efficient CO2/N2 Separation. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2024;52:1745–1758. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(24)60464-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Farmahini A.H., Krishnamurthy S., Friedrich D., Brandani S., Sarkisov L. Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:10666–10741. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ahlen M., Cheung O., Xu C. Low-Concentration CO2 Capture Using Metal-Organic Frameworks-Current Status and Future Perspectives. Dalton Trans. 2023;52:1841–1856. doi: 10.1039/D2DT04088C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kazemi A., Moghadaskhou F., Pordsari M.A., Manteghi F., Tadjarodi A., Ghaemi A. Enhanced CO2 Capture Potential of Uio-66-NH2 Synthesized by Sonochemical Method: Experimental Findings and Performance Evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:19891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47221-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Peh S.B., Farooq S., Zhao D. Techno-Economic Analysis of Mof-Based Adsorption Cycles for Postcombustion CO2 Capture from Wet Flue Gas. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023;268:118390. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.118390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen B., Fan D., Pinto R.V., Dovgaliuk I., Nandi S., Chakraborty D., Garcia-Moncada N., Vimont A., McMonagle C.J., Bordonhos M., et al. A Scalable Robust Microporous Al-Mof for Post-Combustion Carbon Capture. Adv. Sci. 2024;11:e2401070. doi: 10.1002/advs.202401070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Siegelman R.L., Milner P.J., Forse A.C., Lee J.H., Colwell K.A., Neaton J.B., Reimer J.A., Weston S.C., Long J.R. Water Enables Efficient CO2 Capture from Natural Gas Flue Emissions in an Oxidation-Resistant Diamine-Appended Metal-Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:13171–13186. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b05567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Alivand M.S., Mazaheri O., Wu Y., Zavabeti A., Christofferson A.J., Meftahi N., Russo S.P., Stevens G.W., Scholes C.A., Mumford K.A. Engineered Assembly of Water-Dispersible Nanocatalysts Enables Low-Cost and Green CO2 Capture. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1249. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28869-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lee G., Ahmed I., Jhung S.H. CO2 Adsorption Using Functionalized Metal–Organic Frameworks under Low Pressure: Contribution of Functional Groups, Excluding Amines, to Adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;481:148440. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.148440. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Di T., Yoshida Y., Otake K.I., Kitagawa S., Kitagawa H. Increased CO2/N2 Selectivity by Stepwise Fluorination in Isoreticular Ultramicroporous Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Sci. 2024;15:9641–9648. doi: 10.1039/D4SC01525H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Venturi D.M., Notari M.S., Bondi R., Mosconi E., Kaiser W., Mercuri G., Giambastiani G., Rossin A., Taddei M., Costantino F. Increased CO2 Affinity and Adsorption Selectivity in Mof-801 Fluorinated Analogues. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14:40801–40811. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c07640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kazemi A., Pordsari M.A., Tamtaji M., Afshari M.H., Keshavarz S., Zeinali F., Baesmat H., Zahiri S., Manteghi F., Ghaemi A., et al. Unveiling the Power of Defect Engineering in Mof-808 to Enhance Efficient Carbon Dioxide Adsorption and Separation by Harnessing the Potential of Dft Analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;494:153049. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.153049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Agueda V.I., Delgado J.A., Uguina M.A., Brea P., Spjelkavik A.I., Blom R., Grande C. Adsorption and Diffusion of H2, N2, CO, CH4 and CO2 in Utsa-16 Metal-Organic Framework Extrudates. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015;124:159–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.08.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gaikwad S., Han S. Shaping Metal-Organic Framework (Mof) with Activated Carbon and Silica Powder Materials for CO2 Capture. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023;11:109593. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Grande C.A., Blom R., Middelkoop V., Matras D., Vamvakeros A., Jacques S.D.M., Beale A.M., Di Michiel M., Anne Andreassen K., Bouzga A.M. Multiscale Investigation of Adsorption Properties of Novel 3d Printed Utsa-16 Structures. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;402:126166. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Henrotin A., Heymans N., Duprez M.E., Mouchaham G., Serre C., Wong D., Robinson R., Mulrooney D., Casaban J., De Weireld G. Lab-Scale Pilot for CO2 Capture Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption: Mil-160(Al) Vs Zeolite 13x. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2024;12:100224. doi: 10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li Y., Bai Y., Wang Z., Gong Q., Li M., Bo Y., Xu H., Jiang G., Chi K. Exquisitely Constructing a Robust Mof with Dual Pore Sizes for Efficient CO2 Capture. Molecules. 2023;28:6276. doi: 10.3390/molecules28176276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim M., Min H.J., Choi M.K., Kim K.C., Kim B., Kang M., Lee N., Eum K., Kim J.H., Kim D.W. Polymer-in-Cage Strategy for Pore Tuning of High-Aspect Ratio Zif Nanoplate: Toward Sub-Micrometer-Thick Large Area CO2 Separation Membranes. Adv. Sci. 2026;13:e19351. doi: 10.1002/advs.202519351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Berdichevsky E.K., Downing V.A., Hooper R.W., Butt N.W., McGrath D.T., Donnelly L.J., Michaelis V.K., Katz M.J. Ultrahigh Size Exclusion Selectivity for Carbon Dioxide from Nitrogen/Methane in an Ultramicroporous Metal-Organic Framework. Inorg. Chem. 2022;61:7970–7979. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shi Y., Xie Y., Cui H., Alothman Z.A., Alduhaish O., Lin R.-B., Chen B. An Ultramicroporous Metal–Organic Framework with Dual Functionalities for High Sieving Separation of CO2 from CH4 and N2. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;446:137101. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hu Z., Wang Y., Farooq S., Zhao D. A Highly Stable Metal-Organic Framework with Optimum Aperture Size for CO2 Capture. AIChE J. 2017;63:4103–4114. doi: 10.1002/aic.15837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Åhlén M., Zhou Y., Hedbom D., Cho H.S., Strømme M., Terasaki O., Cheung O. Efficient SF6 capture and separation in robust gallium- and vanadium-based metal–organic frameworks. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023;11:26435–26441. doi: 10.1039/D3TA05297D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Li C.N., Wang S.M., Tao Z.P., Liu L., Xu W.G., Gu X.J., Han Z.B. Green Synthesis of Mof-801(Zr/Ce/Hf) for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 Separation. Inorg. Chem. 2023;62:7853–7860. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhu Z., Xiao J., Zhang M., Huang Y., Yuan S. Precision Pore Engineering Via Fit-Topology Assembly in a Zn-Porphyrin Mof for Selective C2H2 Capture. Chem. Sci. 2025;16:22638–22646. doi: 10.1039/D5SC07319G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Li T., Chen D.-L., Sullivan J.E., Kozlowski M.T., Johnson J.K., Rosi N.L. Systematic Modulation and Enhancement of CO2: N2 Selectivity and Water Stability in an Isoreticular Series of Bio-Mof-11 Analogues. Chem. Sci. 2013;4:1746–1755. doi: 10.1039/c3sc22207a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.He T., Xiao Y., Zhao Q., Zhou M., He G. Ultramicroporous Metal–Organic Framework Qc-5-Cu for Highly Selective Adsorption of CO2 from C2H4 Stream. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020;59:3153–3161. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05665. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gebremariam S.K., Varghese A.M., Ehrling S., Al Wahedi Y., AlHajaj A., Dumee L.F., Karanikolos G.N. Hierarchically Porous Structured Adsorbents with Ultrahigh Metal-Organic Framework Loading for CO2 Capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024;16:50785–50799. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c10730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Humby J.D., Benson O., Smith G.L., Argent S.P., da Silva I., Cheng Y., Rudic S., Manuel P., Frogley M.D., Cinque G., et al. Host-Guest Selectivity in a Series of Isoreticular Metal-Organic Frameworks: Observation of Acetylene-to-Alkyne and Carbon Dioxide-to-Amide Interactions. Chem. Sci. 2019;10:1098–1106. doi: 10.1039/C8SC03622E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bolotov V.A., Kovalenko K.A., Samsonenko D.G., Han X., Zhang X., Smith G.L., McCormick L.J., Teat S.J., Yang S., Lennox M.J., et al. Enhancement of CO2 Uptake and Selectivity in a Metal-Organic Framework by the Incorporation of Thiophene Functionality. Inorg. Chem. 2018;57:5074–5082. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Demakov P.A., Volynkin S.S., Samsonenko D.G., Fedin V.P., Dybtsev D.N. A Selenophene-Incorporated Metal-Organic Framework for Enhanced CO2 Uptake and Adsorption Selectivity. Molecules. 2020;25:4396. doi: 10.3390/molecules25194396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ethiraj J., Bonino F., Vitillo J.G., Lomachenko K.A., Lamberti C., Reinsch H., Lillerud K.P., Bordiga S. Solvent-Driven Gate Opening in Mof-76-Ce: Effect on CO2 Adsorption. ChemSusChem. 2016;9:713–719. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201501574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Singh H.D., Nandi S., Chakraborty D., Singh K., Vinod C.P., Vaidhyanathan R. Coordination Flexibility Aided CO2 -Specific Gating in an Iron Isonicotinate Mof. Chem. Asian J. 2022;17:e202101305. doi: 10.1002/asia.202101305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ren H.-Y., Zhang X.-M. Enhanced Selective CO2 Capture Upon Incorporation of Dimethylformamide in the Cobalt Metal–Organic Framework [CO3(OH)2(Btca)2] Energy Fuels. 2015;30:526–530. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02393. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ullah Khan A., Samuel O., Othman M.H.D., Younas M., Kamaludin R., Puteh M.H., Kurniawan T.A., Yinn Wong K., Kadirkhan F., Yoshida N. Enhancing CO2 Adsorption Selectivity of Mof-199: Investigating the Synergistic Effect of Mg Metal Doping and Polyethyleneimine Impregnation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024;347:127511. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127511. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liu J., Tian J., Thallapally P.K., McGrail B.P. Selective CO2 Capture from Flue Gas Using Metal–Organic Frameworks―A Fixed Bed Study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012;116:9575–9581. doi: 10.1021/jp300961j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Remy T., Peter S.A., Van der Perre S., Valvekens P., De Vos D.E., Baron G.V., Denayer J.F.M. Selective Dynamic CO2 Separations on Mg-Mof-74 at Low Pressures: A Detailed Comparison with 13×. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117:9301–9310. doi: 10.1021/jp401923v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Liu J., Wang Y., Benin A.I., Jakubczak P., Willis R.R., LeVan M.D. CO2/H2O Adsorption Equilibrium and Rates on Metal-Organic Frameworks: Hkust-1 and Ni/Dobdc. Langmuir. 2010;26:14301–14307. doi: 10.1021/la102359q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Cui S., Shao Y., Zhong W. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Bimetallic Mg-Ca/Dobdc Metal—Organic Frameworks as a High Stability CO2 Adsorbent. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;474:145018. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.145018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rafati Jolodar A., Abdollahi M., Fatemi S., Mansoubi H. Enhancing Carbon Dioxide Separation from Natural Gas in Dynamic Adsorption by a New Type of Bimetallic Mof; MIL-101(Cr-Al) Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024;334:125990. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Le V.N., Nguyen V.C., Nguyen H.T., Tran H.D., Tu T.N., Kim W.-S., Kim J. Facile Synthesis of Bimetallic Mil-100(Fe, Al) for Enhancing CO2 Adsorption Performance. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2023;360:112716. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Li R., Ren X., Feng X., Li X., Hu C., Wang B. A Highly Stable Metal- and Nitrogen-Doped Nanocomposite Derived from Zn/Ni-ZIF-8 Capable of CO2 Capture and Separation. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:6894–6897. doi: 10.1039/c4cc01087f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Raptopoulou C.P. Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthetic Methods and Potential Applications. Materials. 2021;14:310. doi: 10.3390/ma14020310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jampaiah D., Shah D., Chalkidis A., Saini P., Babarao R., Arandiyan H., Bhargava S.K. Bimetallic Copper-Cerium-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Selective Carbon Dioxide Capture. Langmuir. 2024;40:9732–9740. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Abid H.R., Rada Z.H., Li Y., Mohammed H.A., Wang Y., Wang S., Arandiyan H., Tan X., Liu S. Boosting CO2 Adsorption and Selectivity in Metal-Organic Frameworks of MIL-96(Al) Via Second Metal Ca Coordination. RSC Adv. 2020;10:8130–8139. doi: 10.1039/D0RA00305K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Cui P., Tang Y., Guo A., Wang C., Liu M., Peng W., Yu F. Enhanced CO2 Adsorption Properties with Bimetallic Znce-Mof Prepared Using a Microchannel Reactor. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2024;19:14. doi: 10.1007/s11705-025-2518-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Denning S., Majid A.A., Lucero J.M., Crawford J.M., Carreon M.A., Koh C.A. Metal-Organic Framework Hkust-1 Promotes Methane Hydrate Formation for Improved Gas Storage Capacity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:53510–53518. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c15675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lau C.H., Babarao R., Hill M.R. A Route to Drastic Increase of CO2 Uptake in Zr Metal Organic Framework Uio-66. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:3634–3636. doi: 10.1039/c3cc40470f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lei R., Shen W., Yang Z., Jin H., Chai W., Guo X., Ge H., Jin D. Enhanced CO2 Adsorption in Cux-Mof-5: Optimal Doping and Regeneration Performance. Mater. Today Sustain. 2025;31:101181. doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Mutyala S., Yu Y.-D., Jin W.-G., Wang Z.-S., Zheng D.-Y., Ye C.-R., Luo B. CO2 Capture Using Amine Incorporated Uio-66 in Atmospheric Pressure. J. Porous Mater. 2019;26:1831–1838. doi: 10.1007/s10934-019-00779-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Pirzadeh K., Esfandiari K., Ghoreyshi A.A., Rahimnejad M. CO2 and N2 Adsorption and Separation Using Aminated Uio-66 and Cu3(Btc)2: A Comparative Study. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020;37:513–524. doi: 10.1007/s11814-019-0433-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gaikwad S., Kim Y., Gaikwad R., Han S. Enhanced CO2 Capture Capacity of Amine-Functionalized Mof-177 Metal Organic Framework. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021;9:105523. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Jun H.J., Yoo D.K., Jhung S.H. Metal-Organic Framework (Mof-808) Functionalized with Ethyleneamines: Selective Adsorbent to Capture CO2 under Low Pressure. J. CO2 Util. 2022;58:101932. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101932. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Nam H.Y., Lee G., Jhung S.H. Selective CO2 Adsorption over a Zr-Based Metal–Organic Framework Functionalized with Tris(2-Aminoethyl)Amine. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;494:153072. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.153072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Esfahani H.J., Shahhosseini S., Ghaemi A. Improved Structure of Zr-Btc Metal Organic Framework Using NH2 to Enhance CO2 Adsorption Performance. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:17700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44076-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Quan W., Holmes H.E., Zhang F., Hamlett B.L., Finn M.G., Abney C.W., Kapelewski M.T., Weston S.C., Lively R.P., Koros W.J. Scalable Formation of Diamine-Appended Metal-Organic Framework Hollow Fiber Sorbents for Postcombustion CO2 Capture. JACS Au. 2022;2:1350–1358. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.2c00029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Hughes R., Yancy-Caballero D., Zamarripa-Perez M., Omell B., Matuszewski M., Bhattacharyya D. Modeling and Techno-Economic Optimization of a Tetraamine-Appended Metal–Organic Framework for Ngcc-Based CO2 Capture Using Fixed Bed Contactors. Energy Fuels. 2024;38:2511–2524. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c03802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lu Z., Godfrey H.G., da Silva I., Cheng Y., Savage M., Tuna F., McInnes E.J., Teat S.J., Gagnon K.J., Frogley M.D., et al. Modulating Supramolecular Binding of Carbon Dioxide in a Redox-Active Porous Metal-Organic Framework. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14212. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Park J.M., Yoo D.K., Jhung S.H. Selective CO2 Adsorption over Functionalized Zr-Based Metal Organic Framework under Atmospheric or Lower Pressure: Contribution of Functional Groups to Adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;402:126254. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Finsy V., Ma L., Alaerts L., De Vos D.E., Baron G.V., Denayer J.F.M. Separation of CO2/CH4 Mixtures with the MIL-53(Al) Metal–Organic Framework. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009;120:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Han Y., Ji C., Lou Y., Li R., He M., Yuan D., Han Z. Topology-Directed Cage Engineering in Mofs for Efficient C2H2/CO2/C2H4 Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:19262–19271. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c05068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Gu C., Liu Y., Wang W., Liu J., Hu J. Effects of Functional Groups for CO2 Capture Using Metal Organic Frameworks. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2020;15:437–449. doi: 10.1007/s11705-020-1961-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Roy S., Suresh V.M., Maji T.K. Self-Cleaning Mof: Realization of Extreme Water Repellence in Coordination Driven Self-Assembled Nanostructures. Chem. Sci. 2016;7:2251–2256. doi: 10.1039/C5SC03676C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.He X., Yu C., Li J., Wang Z., Ye K.-Y. Introducing Alkyl Chains to Realize the Construction of Superhydrophobic/Superoleophilic Mofs and the Transformation from Three-Dimensional to Two-Dimensional Structure. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2024;11:1123–1134. doi: 10.1039/D3QI02250A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Chaudhari A.K., Mukherjee S., Nagarkar S.S., Joarder B., Ghosh S.K. Bi-Porous Metal–Organic Framework with Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Channels: Selective Gas Sorption and Reversible Iodine Uptake Studies. CrystEngComm. 2013;15:9465–9471. doi: 10.1039/c3ce40795k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Yoo D.K., Jhung S.H. Selective CO2 Adsorption at Low Pressure with a Zr-Based Uio-67 Metal–Organic Framework Functionalized with Aminosilanes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022;10:8856–8865. doi: 10.1039/D1TA09772E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Pham T., Space B. Insights into the Gas Adsorption Mechanisms in Metal-Organic Frameworks from Classical Molecular Simulations. Top. Curr. Chem. 2020;378:14. doi: 10.1007/s41061-019-0276-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Colon Y.J., Snurr R.Q. High-Throughput Computational Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:5735–5749. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00070F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Qiao Z., Zhang K., Jiang J. In Silico Screening of 4764 Computation-Ready, Experimental Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Separation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:2105–2114. doi: 10.1039/C5TA08984K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Li S., Chung Y.G., Snurr R.Q. High-Throughput Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture in the Presence of Water. Langmuir. 2016;32:10368–10376. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Qiao Z., Peng C., Zhou J., Jiang J. High-Throughput Computational Screening of 137953 Metal–Organic Frameworks for Membrane Separation of a CO2/N2/CH4 Mixture. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:15904–15912. doi: 10.1039/C6TA06262H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ji C., Zhang K. Computational Screening of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separation of CO2 and N2 from Wet Flue Gas. J. Mater. Sci. 2024;59:9371–9383. doi: 10.1007/s10853-024-09744-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Boyd P.G., Chidambaram A., Garcia-Diez E., Ireland C.P., Daff T.D., Bounds R., Gladysiak A., Schouwink P., Moosavi S.M., Maroto-Valer M.M., et al. Data-Driven Design of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Wet Flue Gas CO2 Capture. Nature. 2019;576:253–256. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1798-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Daglar H., Keskin S. Recent Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges in High-Throughput Computational Screening of Mofs for Gas Separations. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020;422:213470. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zhang X., Zhang K., Yoo H., Lee Y. Machine Learning-Driven Discovery of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Efficient CO2 Capture in Humid Condition. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021;9:2872–2879. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Mashhadimoslem H., Abdol M.A., Karimi P., Zanganeh K., Shafeen A., Elkamel A., Kamkar M. Computational and Machine Learning Methods for CO2 Capture Using Metal-Organic Frameworks. ACS Nano. 2024;18:23842–23875. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c13001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study.














