Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1976 Fall;9(3):335–354. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-335

Correspondence between saying and doing: teaching children to share and praise1

Ann Rogers-Warren 1, Donald M Baer 1
PMCID: PMC1311946  PMID: 16795529

Abstract

Five small groups of preschool children were taught to share and praise by the modelling of these behaviors and reinforcement of their reports of sharing and praising. Experiment I demonstrated that modelling and reinforcement of any (true or untrue) reports of sharing, and then of praising, promptly increased reports of the corresponding behaviors. Modelling and reinforcement for true reports of each behavior increased both reporting and actual behavior. Experiment II showed that both reported and actual sharing and praising may be increased by modelling and reinforcement for true reports of the target behavior, without previous reinforcement for any (true or untrue) reports of those behaviors. Sharing, but not praising, generalized to a second setting. Experiment III replicated the results of Experiment II for sharing and praising, and demonstrated similar success in increasing a third behavior, specific praising. In general, these experiments show that developing correspondence between children's reports of behavior and actual behavior may be an efficient means of increasing prosocial responses.

Keywords: social behavior, sharing, modelling, praise, reporting, generalization, multiple baseline, reinforcement delay, children

Full text

PDF
335

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bem S. L. Verbal self-control: the establishment of effective self-instruction. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Aug;74(4):485–491. doi: 10.1037/h0024822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FESTINGER L., CARLSMITH J. M. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. J Abnorm Psychol. 1959 Mar;58(2):203–210. doi: 10.1037/h0041593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LOVAAS O. I. CONTROL OF FOOD INTAKE IN CHILDREN BY REINFORCEMENT OF RELEVANT VERBAL BEHAVIOR. J Abnorm Psychol. 1964 Jun;68:672–678. doi: 10.1037/h0047612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. LOVAAS O. I. CUE PROPERTIES OF WORDS: THE CONTROL OF OPERANT RESPONDING BY RATE AND CONTENT OF VERBAL OPERANTS. Child Dev. 1964 Mar;35:245–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1964.tb05934.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LOVAAS O. I. Interaction between verbal and nonverbal behavior. Child Dev. 1961 Jun;32:329–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1961.tb05031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Meichenbaum D., Goodman J. The developmental control of operant motor responding by verbal operants. J Exp Child Psychol. 1969 Jun;7(3):553–565. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(69)90016-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Monahan J., O'Leary K. D. Effects of self-instruction on rule-breaking behavior. Psychol Rep. 1971 Dec;29(3):1059–1066. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1971.29.3f.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Leary K. D. The effects of self-instruction on immoral behavior. J Exp Child Psychol. 1968 Jun;6(2):297–301. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(68)90092-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Risley T. R., Hart B. Developing correspondence between the non-verbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Winter;1(4):267–281. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SHERMAN J. A. MODIFICATION OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR THROUGH REINFORCEMENT OF RELATED VERBAL BEHAVIOR. Child Dev. 1964 Sep;35:717–723. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1964.tb05211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES