Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1974 Summer;7(2):263–269. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-263

The effectiveness of currently enrolled student proctors in an undergraduate special education course1

John F Gaynor 1,2, William D Wolking 1,2
PMCID: PMC1311965  PMID: 4436174

Abstract

Potential users of Keller's personalized college classroom method might find it impractical to provide student proctors from the ranks of those who had previously mastered the course material. An alternative is to let currently enrolled students proctor and tutor each other. Such a method imposes the burden of showing that its effectiveness is not a function of (1) student collaboration or (2) the effects of “practice” received by students who listen to the performance of others before their own performance. The present study compared students proctored by previously trained students (Control) with students who received proctoring from classmates (Experimental). Experimental group performance was superior to Control group performance. The effects of “practice” and collaboration were ruled out as determinants of the difference between groups. It is hypothesized that the superior performance of the Experimental students was related to their activities as proctors.

Full text

PDF
263

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Farmer J., Lachter G. D., Blaustein J. J., Cole B. K. The role of proctoring in personalized instruction. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Winter;5(4):401–404. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Keller F. S. "Good-bye, teacher...". J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):79–89. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lloyd K. E., Knutzen N. J. A self-paced programmed undergraduate course in the experimental analysis of behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):125–133. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McMichael J. S., Corey J. R. Contingency management in an introductory psychology course produces better learning. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):79–83. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sheppard W. C., Macdermot H. G. Design and evaluation of a programmed course in introductory psychology. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Spring;3(1):5–11. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES