Skip to main content
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP logoLink to Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP
. 2026 Mar 17;25(4):101555. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2026.101555

Sec and Tat Mediated Secretion Safeguards Mycobacterium tuberculosis Membrane Homeostasis

Priyadarshini Sanyal 1,2,‡, Jagadeeshwari Uppada 1,‡, Shashank Sinha 3, Yashasvi Bhat 1, Sidra Khan 4, Shri Vishalini Rajaram 3,5, Evanjalee Albert Arokiyaraj 3,5, Gagan Deep Jhingan 4, Nisheeth Agarwal 6, Areejit Samal 3,7,∗, Vinay Kumar Nandicoori 1,2,4,∗
PMCID: PMC13122829  PMID: 41850656

Abstract

Protein secretion is essential for the growth and virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, yet the organization and function of its secretion pathways remain poorly understood. We reviewed the existing literature, combined it with systematic queries, and finalized annotations based on experimental data and computational predictions to compile a curated list of 92 secretory components and 198 reactions involved in Sec, twin-arginine translocation (Tat), and ESX pathways. Using CRISPRi, targeted depletion of SecA1 or TatAC impaired both in vitro growth and ex vivo survival. Label-free quantitative secretome analysis revealed decreased export of substrates dependent on SecA1 and TatAC, with enrichment of cytosolic proteins in culture filtrates, indicating increased membrane dysbiosis. Membrane proteomics showed elevated levels of proteins engaged in intermediary and lipid metabolism, while proteins associated with the cell wall and cell processes decreased, suggesting weakened membrane integrity. Loss of SecA1 or TatAC increased membrane permeability, with the effect being more pronounced in the case of TatAC, and caused structural abnormalities seen under electron microscopy. Overall, our integrated multi-omics and functional genetics studies demonstrate that the SecA1 and Tat pathways are essential for maintaining membrane homeostasis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. These results suggest that essential secretory proteins may be promising targets for therapeutic intervention.

Keywords: CRISPRi knockdown, membrane permeability, membrane proteome, protein secretion, secretome, secretory components

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name ga1.jpg

Highlights

  • •

    Computational Secretion Systems map in Mtb: 92 components, 198 reactions across Mtb secretion and TF–omics overlay defines regulation of secretory gene networks.

  • •

    CRISPRi-mediated depletion of SecA1 or TatA significantly reduced bacterial survival in vitro and ex vivo, establishing their essential roles in Mtb physiology.

  • •

    Quantitative secretomics, membrane proteomics and phenotypic analyses, including ultrastructural defects and increased EtBr uptake, demonstrated disrupted membrane homeostasis upon SecA1 or TatAC depletion.

In Brief

The organization and function of secretion pathways in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) remain unclear. We reconstructed a computational secretory system map for Sec, Tat, and ESX pathways in Mtb containing 92 secretory components and 198 reactions. CRISPRi, depletion of SecA1 or TatAC impaired bacterial survival. Quantitative secretome and membrane proteome revealed enrichment of cytosolic proteins suggesting weakened membrane integrity of depleted strains. SecA1 or TatAC loss increased permeability and structural defects, indicating their essential roles in membrane homeostasis and therapeutic targeting potential.


Protein secretion is a ubiquitous mechanism for transporting macromolecules across membranes. It is found in all three domains of life: Prokaryota, Archaea, and Eukaryota. In Eukaryotes, protein secretion occurs through a general pathway called the “Sec pathway.” This pathway is present in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and involves secretory vesicles carrying proteins to the Golgi apparatus (1). In prokaryotes, proteins with N-terminal signal peptides (SP) are mainly secreted through two pathways. These are the Sec-dependent pathway (2, 3) and the Sec-independent, twin-arginine translocation pathway (Tat) (4), which is also conserved in plants (5, 6, 7, 8).

Sec-dependent secretion is divided into two types: a) cotranslational translocation (Signal Recognition Particle (SRP)-mediated), which exports unfolded proteins while being translated by ribosomes, and b) post-translational translocation (SecA1 and SecA2-mediated), which exports unfolded proteins post-translation (9). The Sec secretion system comprises SecY, SecE, and SecG proteins (9, 10, 11), which form the SecYEG-SecDF-YajC-YidC holotranslocon, with the help of auxiliary proteins SecD, SecF, YajC, and YidC (12). SRP and SecA recognize nascent preproteins with an N-terminal Sec SP, directing translocation via GTP hydrolysis of FtsY in the SRP pathway and ATPase activity of SecA in the case of SecA-mediated transport (13). Type I and II signal peptidases; associated with the holotranslocon, act on the cleavage sites, facilitating the conversion to a mature protein (8, 14). The Tat (15) system in prokaryotes and the thylakoid membrane of plant chloroplasts (4) is involved in secreting a subset of folded proteins (15, 16) containing two invariant arginine residues (RR motif) (17). In Escherichia coli, five tat genes, that is tatABCDE, have been reported, among them tatABCD are present in an operon (18).

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) secretes an array of proteins, including virulence factors, with the help of generalized and specialized secretion pathways. In Mtb, the canonical SecA has two paralogs, SecA1 and SecA2 (19, 20) both having ATPase activity; the non-canonical SecA2 differs from SecA1 in that it only secretes a small set of proteins, which are known to be involved in virulence (21, 22, 23, 24). The Mtb genome does not encode tatE, and tatD is not involved in Tat-mediated protein export (18). TatB and TatC form a Tat Complex-I in the inner membrane, and during translocation, binding of TatA forms Tat Complex-II, which forms an oligomeric pore across the membrane that assists in proton motive force mediated protein translocation (25). Specialized secretion systems like Type VII Secretion Systems (T7SS) transport small proteins with PE/PPE, WXG, or YXXXD/E motifs (26) and comprise five systems (ESX-1 to ESX-5) that are involved in virulence, pathogenesis, metal homeostasis, and host modulation (27). While sharing common structural and evolutionary features, ESX-1, ESX-3, and ESX-5 are well-studied and functionally linked, whereas ESX-2 and ESX-4, which contribute to DNA regulation (28) and heme acquisition (29), are less characterized.

There are several gaps in our understanding of this complex network of secretion systems in Mtb, which we aimed to address. We first considered what is known about: (i) the core and accessory components of different secretion systems and their organization, and (ii) the involvement and regulation of these components across multiple stages of protein transport, to establish the conceptual framework for our study. Building on this foundation, we asked experimentally: (iii) what is the role of the SecA1 and Tat secretion systems in cell growth and survival, and what are their substrates? (iv) what is the impact of depleting SecA1 and TatAC on Mtb membrane homeostasis? In this study, we systematically reviewed the published literature and integrated it with ChIP-Seq and transcriptomic datasets to create an in silico systems-level map of secretory pathways and uncovered the network’s regulatory structure. We generated conditional depletion strains of SecA1 and the Tat pathway to explore their biological roles. Proteome analysis of WT and depleted strains suggested that although secretion of target substrates is compromised, it leads to the unusual secretion of cytosolic proteins. Experiments indicate that depletion of these systems impacts membrane homeostasis, reflected in changes in morphology and permeability.

Experimental Procedures

Bacterial Strains and Plasmids Used for the Study

Mtb H37Rv (Rv), a pathogenic laboratory strain sensitive to all antibiotics, was used in this study. Conditional knockdown strains Rv-secA1dc, Rv-tatAdc, and complementation strains were generated by electroporating relevant constructs into Rv. The pTetIntdCas9 plasmid used in this study has dCas9 under a tetracycline (ATc) inducible promoter and an L5 integrative site, as described previously (30). Two guide RNAs were designed to achieve sufficient depletion upon the addition of ATc (500 ng/ml). sec1144 and sec1183 are the guide RNA sequences aimed at targeting secA1, and tat1142 and tat1181 are two guide RNA sequences for tatA. Two guide RNAs, each of 20 nucleotides complementary sequence for each target gene from 5′UTR and after the PAM sequence 5′NGG3′ were cloned into the pTetIntdCas9 vector pTet-dC-SecA1 and pTet-dC-TatA (Supplemental Fig. S5, A and B). Expression of dCas9 and target sequence-specific guide RNAs, both under a Tet-inducible promoter, halts RNAP progression; thus, the target gene is knocked down (Supplemental Fig. S5C). For complementation, the secA1 (secA1gmut) or tatA (tatAgmut) were mutated (Supplemental Fig. S5D) such that the guide RNA binding is abrogated. secA1gmut and its native promoter were amplified separately, digested, and cloned into the pSNG-S vector containing giles attP and Integrase (unpublished) to generate pSNG-secA1gmut. tatAgmut, along with downstream tatC and their native promoter, were amplified separately (Supplemental Fig. S5D), digested, and cloned into the pSNG-S vector to generate pSNG-tatACgmut. The pknB conditional gene expression strain under regulation of pptr promoter (Pristinamycin) Rv-pptr-B was used as a positive control (31).

Antibody Generation, Lysate Preparation, and Western Blots

The antibodies (SecA1 and TatA) are polyclonal. 6x-His-tagged full-length proteins SecA1 and TatA were purified using Ni-NTA beads and injected into mice. Serum was collected and tested for antibodies using Mtb WT lysate at different dilutions. To evaluate the antibodies raised, 20 ng of purified TatA/SecA1 were resolved and probed with α-TatA (5000 diluted) and α-SecA1 (10,000 diluted). It is apparent from the full blots provided in Panel one and Panel three that the antibodies raised could effectively recognize 20 ng of proteins (Supplemental Fig. S5F). To evaluate their ability to detect endogenous SecA1 and TatA proteins, we have resolved 20 μg and 100 μg of Rv lysate, respectively. Membranes were probed with α-SecA1 antibody (1:5000 dilutions) and α-TatA antibody (1:1000 dilutions). While we detected a single band with α-SecA1 antibody, we observed a few contaminating bands when we probed with α-TatA antibody (Supplemental Fig. S5F). However, the most prominent band corresponded to TatA, and hence we used these antibodies for further work. Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, and Rv-tatAdc strains were grown until A600 ∼0.8, and whole cell lysate (WCL) was prepared by resuspending the cell pellet in lysis buffer (1× PBSG, 1× PMSF, and PIC: Protease Inhibitor Cocktail). The cells were lysed using bead beating (8–10 cycles, 1 min ON and 2 min OFF). The cells were centrifuged at 158,71g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was quantified using the BCA reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The WCLs were resolved on 10% (for SecA1) or 15% (for TatA) SDS-PAGE gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with α-SecA1 or α-TatA, or α-GroEL1 antibodies raised in the lab.

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR

The Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, and Rv-tatAdc strains, with or without ATc, were grown to A600 ∼0.8, and cells equivalent to 10 O.D. were harvested after 3 days of ATc treatment. The cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of Trizol (Invitrogen), and cells were lysed by bead beating (3 rounds of 30 s ON and 2 min OFF). The cells were centrifuged at 158,71g for 10 min at 4 °C, and 300 μl of chloroform was added to the supernatants. The samples were vortexed and centrifuged, and the aqueous layer containing RNA was precipitated. The pellet was resuspended in RNase-free water, treated with DNase I (Invitrogen), and purified using a Qiagen column. 1 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) on the QuantStudio three system (Applied Biosystems). Data were normalized to 16S rRNA expression levels. The ΔΔCt algorithm was used to evaluate the relative fold change in gene expression.

Bacterial Survival invitro and upon exvivo Peritoneal Macrophage Infection

The strains were inoculated at A600 ∼0.1 in the presence and absence of ATc. The colony forming units were enumerated on day 0, 2 and 4. Colonies were calculated and plotted using GraphPad Prism. For the ex vivo infections, peritoneal macrophages were used. Briefly, thioglycolate was injected into the mouse peritoneum, and macrophages were isolated 4 days post-injection. All the procedures involving live animal were conducted following the regulations and ethical guidelines approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee at CSIR-CCMB animal house facility (Institutional Animal Ethics Committee -25/2023). 3 × 105 cells were seeded per well, and infection was performed at a 1:5 (macrophage:bacterial cells) MOI. Colony forming units were enumerated at 4 and 72 h post-infection with and without ATc. Colonies were counted, and a graph was plotted using GraphPad Prism.

Computational Reconstruction of Secretory Systems in Mtb

Inspired by the work by Feizi et al. on genome-scale reconstruction of the protein secretion system in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we created a manually curated reconstruction of the secretion systems in Mtb (32). The systematic manual curation of existing literature on bacterial secretion systems, supported by both experimental and/or computational evidence, was performed as depicted in the workflow (32, 33) (Supplemental Fig. S1A). Based on the compiled evidence, components of secretion pathways, namely, Sec-dependent (SRP-dependent, SecA1-dependent, and SecA2-dependent), Sec-independent (Tat), and T7SS, were collated and annotated (Supplemental Tables S1 and S2).

Further, the protein signatures relevant for secretion and localization, such as presence or absence of SP sequences, lipo motif (LM), transmembrane domain, etc., were assigned using the computational tools SignalP v6.0 (34), Phobius v10.1 (https://phobius.sbc.su.se/), DeepTMHMM v1.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/DeepTMHMM-1.0/), and PcnsHub (35), facilitating the identification and classification of secreted proteins (Supplemental Fig. S1C). Detailed mechanistic information from the existing literature was used to further organize the secretion process into a series of pseudo-chemical reactions, similar to reactions formulated by Feizi et al. for the classical secretion pathway in yeast (32). A pictorial representation of these reactions was created using Biorender (Fig. 1, Supplemental Figs. S2, and S3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of secretion systems in Mtb.A, pictorial model depicting the steps involved in the secretion of a protein containing an N-terminal Sec-specific signal peptide using the SecA1-dependent Sec pathway. B, steps involved in the secretion of a protein containing a Tat signal peptide (twin arginine -RR- motifs) using the Tat pathway. C, overview of protein secretion using specialized secretion systems (ESX1-ESX5) in Mtb. The steps shown were based on mechanistic reactions derived from the experimental evidence provided in Supplemental Table S2. Created in BioRender. Nandicoori, V. (2026) https://BioRender.com/au2hqr4.

To explore the transcriptional regulation of secretory components, publicly available ChIP-Seq data (36) for Mtb transcription factors (TFs) was used to identify TFs directly controlling the different Mtb secretory components (Supplemental Fig. S4 and Supplemental Table S3). A visualization of TFs controlling the Mtb secretory components was generated using the R package ggplot2 (https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/). Gene-level expression changes in secretory components under different stress conditions were obtained from a transcriptomic study by Khan et al. (37). Differential expression was visualized using a heatmap generated with the R package pheatmap (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html).

Culture Filtrate Protein Preparation

To isolate the culture filtrate (CF) proteins from Mtb, Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, and Rv-tatAdc, cultures were grown to early log phase, with or without ATc (500 ng/ml), in Sauton’s media in quadruplets (38). Briefly, the cells were harvested and centrifuged at 1503g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected into a fresh 50 ml Falcon tube, and the pellets were kept aside for preparation of WCL (Whole Cell Lysate). The supernatants were centrifuged again under the same conditions, and the procedure was repeated twice. The supernatants were collected and passed through a 0.2 μm syringe filter after the last centrifugation. The filtered supernatants (CF proteins) were concentrated using 3 kDa Amicon centricons (∼150 ml CF to 1 ml) and stored at −80 °C (Supplemental Fig. S6A).

Secretome Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry

For mass spectrometry of CF proteins, 100 μg were taken into fresh low protein-binding MCTs (microcentrifuge tubes), and 6× volume of ice-cold acetone was added for overnight precipitation at −20 °C. The samples were centrifuged at 158,71g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellets were dried in a speed vacuum. 100 μl resuspension buffer containing 8M urea and 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate was added to the dry pellet, and the sample was resuspended by vortexing for 30 min at RT. 10 mM of tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine was added to the tubes and incubated at RT for 30 min 25 mM of iodoacetamide was added to the tubes and incubated at RT for 30 min in the dark. The proteins were then subjected to trypsin digestion (Trypsin:protein 1:20) at 37 °C overnight. The peptides were desalted using C-18, eluted in a fresh MCT, and stored at −80 °C.

Protocol for Isolation of Membrane and Cytosolic Fractions

Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, and Rv-tatAdc were grown in the presence and absence of ATc (500 ng/ml) in 7H9+OADC media in quadruplets. On the fourth day, the cells were pelleted and resuspended in lysis buffer (1× PBSG, 1× PMSF, and PIC: Protease Inhibitor Cocktail), and cell lysates were prepared using bead beating for eight rounds (1 min ON and 2 min OFF cycles on ice). Samples were centrifuged at 158,71g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and subjected to ultracentrifugation at 1,000,00g for 2h at 4 °C. After the first round of ultracentrifugation, the supernatant was collected and designated as the Cytosolic fraction (C). The pellets were resuspended in 1× PBSG with 1× PMSF and subjected to another two rounds of ultracentrifugation to collect the membrane fractions (M). After the final (third) round of ultracentrifugation, the pellets (M) were resuspended in resuspension buffer (5% SDS, 0.1 M Tris-Cl pH-8.5) and stored at −80 °C (Supplemental Fig. S7A).

MS Sample Preparation and Processing

25 μg of proteins from the membrane and cytosolic fractions were reduced and alkylated with 5 mM tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine and 50 mM iodoacetamide, respectively. Trypsin was added to the lysate at a 1:50 ratio (μg) and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. The digested peptides were purified using a C-18 silica cartridge and dried under speed vacuum. The dry pellet was resuspended in buffer A (2% acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid) and submitted to a mass spectrometer equipped with an Easy-nLC-1000 system connected to an Orbitrap Exploris. The C-18 column (15 cm/1.9 μm) was loaded with 1 μg of peptide and separated using a gradient of buffer B (80% acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 500 nl/min. The LC gradient duration was 110 min. The eluate was injected for MS analysis. MS1 spectra were acquired (Max IT = 60 ms, AGQ goal = 300%; RF Lens = 70%; R = 60K, mass range = 375 − 1500; profile data). All charge states for a given precursor were excluded for 30 s using dynamic exclusion. The top 20 peptides' MS2 spectra were acquired using the following parameters: AGC target 100%, R = 15K, and Max IT = 60 ms.

Experimental Design and Statistical Rationale for Mass Spectrometry

For each strain four biological replicates (n = 4) were processed and 24 RAW files generated were annotated using Proteome Discoverer 2.5 against the M. tuberculosis (strain ATCC 25618/H37Rv) protein obtained from UniProt (proteome identifier UP000001584) database (39) comprising 2306 reviewed entries, downloaded on September 25, 2025. The three replicates (n = 3) were considered for further analysis. The precursor and fragment mass tolerances were set to 10 ppm and 0.02 Da for dual Sequest and Amanda searches. Trypsin/P was set as the protease specificity, with cleavage at the C terminus of "K/R " unless followed by "P". Carbamidomethyl on cysteine was set as a fixed modification, and oxidation of methionine and N-terminal acetylation were set as variable modifications for the database search. Peptides and proteins were annotated at High confidence, corresponding to a false discovery rate of 0.01. Label free quantification values were obtained from MaxQuant (40) as shown in Gagan et al. (41). Mycobrowser (42) database was used for creating a list of Mtb proteins with their respective UniProt ID, Locus ID, and functional classification, and was augmented with information on the presence or absence of SP, transmembrane helices, and non-classical secretion obtained by in silico prediction using SignalP v 6.034, DeepTMHMM v 1.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/DeepTMHMM-1.0/), Phobius v 10.1 (https://phobius.sbc.su.se/), and PncsHub (35). The UniProt IDs and the label free quantification values obtained from MS data were mapped with the list. Proteins with <2 unique peptides were removed, as this eliminates low-confidence identifications that may arise from random peptide matches. For CF samples, proteins with transmembrane helices or known vesicle-associated transport (based on PncsHub (35)) were excluded to avoid contamination from membrane fragments or vesicles, ensuring only genuinely secreted proteins were analyzed. For membrane fractions, proteins lacking transmembrane helices were removed, leaving only integral or strongly membrane-associated proteins. We compared both the CF and membrane fractions dataset obtained with previous studies to further enhance reliability by prioritizing consistently identified proteins, thereby reducing false positives and increasing confidence in the final dataset.

After filtration, the proteins and label free quantification values were log-normalized, and the differential abundance was performed using limma (43). Later, p-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg method, and proteins with adjusted p < 0.05 were considered significant (Fig. 3A). The differential abundance, SP distribution, and functional annotation were visualized using volcano plots, alluvial plots, and chord plots, were generated using ggplot2 (https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/), ggalluvial (44), and circlize (45) packages, respectively, in R.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Secretome of SecA1 and TatAC.A, schematic representation of proteome (Secretome and Membrane proteome) data analysis of SecA1 and TatAC. Raw data generated was searched against the UniProt database, and the resulting spectra were annotated for peptide and protein identification. Sec, Tat, and T7SS signal peptides in the proteins were identified using SignalP v6, PRED-TAT, and PncsHub, and transmembrane helices were predicted using DeepTMHMM 1.0 and Phobius. Protein localization was also checked using psortb v3.0.3. The proteins detected in the samples (n = 3 replicates for each strain) were filtered, normalized, differential abundance analysis and visulatization was done using R. Created in BioRender. Nandicoori, V. (2026) https://BioRender.com/i7bto44. B and C, the volcano plots of SecA1 (B) and TatAC (C) depletion with 1≥log2Fold Change ≤ −1. The purple dots depict the low-abundance proteins, the orange dots depict the high-abundance proteins, and the grey dots represent non-significant proteins. D, the Alluvial plots showing the number of proteins containing various signal peptides and their differential abundances upon SecA1 and TatAC depletion.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

For Scanning Electron Microscopy, 5 ml cells at A600 ∼0.5 of Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, Rv-secA1dc:: secA1, Rv-tatAdc, and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC were centrifuged at 3500×g for 10 min at RT. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellets were resuspended in fixative. The cells were incubated at 37 °C. The cells were centrifuged for 10 min, and the pellets were washed twice with 0.1 M Na-Cacodylate buffer. The cells were resuspended in 1% OsO4 (Osmium tetroxide) and incubated at RT for 90 min in a twirler. The cells were centrifuged again for 10 min at RT. The supernatant was discarded, and dehydration was performed gradually with different concentrations of ethanol: 25% ethanol for 5 min, 50% ethanol for 7 min, 75% ethanol for 10 min, 95% ethanol for 20 min, and 100% ethanol for 30 min, three times. After each step, samples were centrifuged for 10 min at RT. The pellets were resuspended in Hexamethyldisilazane. The samples were gold-coated and imaged by Scanning Electron Microscopy (S3400 N, Hitachi). Cell lengths were measured using ImageJ, and the data were plotted in GraphPad Prism.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

For transmission electron microscopy (TEM) sample preparation, the Scanning Electron Microscopy protocol mentioned above was followed until the dehydration step. After that, the pellets were resuspended in propylene oxide and incubated at 4 °C for 1 to 2 h on a rotator. The samples were spun down, and the supernatant was discarded. A mixture of propylene oxide and resin in a 1:1 ratio was added to the samples, which were then incubated at 4 °C for 2 h on a rotator. This step was repeated with propylene oxide-to-resin ratios of 1:2 and 1:3. Finally, pure resin was added to the samples, which were incubated overnight at 4 °C on a rotator. The next day, the resin was discarded, and pure resin was added to the samples, which were incubated at 60 °C for 2 h. The samples were then sectioned on a microtome into 70 nm-thick transverse sections. The sections were stained with uranyl acetate, and images were acquired using TEM (Talos L120c, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Ethidium Bromide (EtBr) Uptake Assay

Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1, Rv-tatAdc, and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC strains were inoculated with and without ATc, and Rv-pptr-B was grown in the presence and absence of 250 ng/ml Pristinamycin at A600 ∼0.1. A heat-killed Rv-vcdc was used as a purposefully dead cell control. The heat-killed cells were prepared by heating Rv-vcdc at 80 °C for 90 min in a water bath. The cells were then harvested at five time points, D0 (day 0), D2, D3, D4, and D5, for the EtBr uptake assay. The cell pellets were washed with 1× PBST80. Cells at A600 ∼0.5 were harvested from the cultures in an MCT, and 1 μg/ml EtBr was added with and without Verapamil (40 μg/ml). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min (data not shown) and 30 min in a standing incubator in the dark. After incubation, the cells were washed twice with 1× PBST80 to remove residual EtBr. After the second wash, the pellets were resuspended in 4% paraformaldehyde for fixation. 200 μl of the cell suspensions were transferred into a 96-well plate for fluorescence readings. The cell suspensions were excited at 510 nm, and the emission spectra were collected at 595 nm. Without EtBr, the added cells were taken as a control to normalize and obtain the absolute unit value using GraphPad Prism software (https://www.graphpad.com/features).

Propidium Iodide (PI) Uptake Assay

Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1, Rv-tatAdc, and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC strains were grown in the presence and absence of ATc, and Rv-pptr-B was grown in the presence and absence of 250 ng/ml Pristinamycin. The cells were processed at time points D0, D2, D3, D4, and D5 for a propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay. A heat-killed Rv-vcdc strain was used as a purposefully dead cell control (as mentioned above). The cells were washed with 1× PBST80. A volume of 5 μg/ml PI was added to cells at A600 ∼0.5, with and without Verapamil (40 μg/ml), and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 5 min in a standing incubator in the dark. After incubation, the cells were washed twice with 1× PBST80 to remove any residual PI. The cells were then resuspended in 4% paraformaldehyde. The cell suspension was used for flow cytometry analysis. The fluorescence of the PI-containing cells was plotted using GraphPad Prism.

Results

Computational Reconstruction of Protein Secretion Systems in Mtb

The computational reconstruction of the secretory systems in Mtb was inspired by Feizi et al. (32), who developed a genome-scale reconstruction of the protein secretion system in the yeast S. cerevisiae to elucidate context-specific regulation and pathway activity, offering insights into how the secretion system behaves under various physiological conditions. We employed a similar reconstruction approach to integrate molecular components and mechanistic interactions, thereby developing a visual framework that encapsulates the secretion process at the systems level. A total of 92 key secretory components belonging to three subsystems: Sec-dependent (SRP-mediated, SecA2-and SecA1-mediated), Sec-independent (Tat), and T7SS (Supplemental Table S1A), were identified (Supplemental Fig. S1A). Among these, 19 components were unique to Sec pathways, three to Tat, and 67 to T7SS, respectively (Supplemental Fig. S1B). Four components: LepB (Rv2903c), Lgt (Rv1614), LspA (Rv1539), and Ppm1 (Rv2051c), are shared between the Sec and Tat pathways and are primarily involved in lipidation and SP cleavage. Five components, primarily chaperones (Rv3417c- GroEL1, Rv0440- GroEL2, Rv3418c- GroES, Rv0009- PpiA, and Rv2582- PpiB), were common to both the Tat and T7SS pathways (Supplemental Fig. S1b).

A total of 198 mechanistic reactions that illustrate the step-by-step procedure involved in protein export were utilized to generate a predictive computational model of secretion systems in Mtb (Fig. 1, Supplemental Figs. S2, and S3). Protein export via SRP involves recognizing the N-terminal SRP SP, translocating the protein through a membrane channel, and cleaving the SP to yield a mature protein (Supplemental Fig. S3). In the absence of the SRP signal, alternative post-translational routes, such as the SecA1-dependent pathway or the Tat system, are used (Supplemental Fig. S2 and Supplemental Table S2A). SecA2 is predominantly cytosolic and exports proteins in conjunction with the chaperone SatS (46). SecA2 reactions were not included in the model, as there is no clear evidence for how these proteins are transported. In addition, Mtb also contains ESX-1 to ESX-5 (47) secretion systems that facilitate the transport of virulent proteins across the membrane (48, 49), and studies have demonstrated that components of the ESX systems create a channel in the inner membrane (Fig. 1C and Supplemental Table S2), although the mechanism by which the proteins are exported into the extracellular environment remains unclear.

Integrative analysis of publicly available ChIP-Seq data (36, 50), together with the secretory components identified in this study, revealed 68 TFs from 28 families that directly regulate secretion-associated genes. Notably, Rv0081 (ArsR family) regulated 12 components across the Sec, Tat, and T7SS pathways, while CosR (Rv0967) and TrcR (Rv1033c) regulated 11 and nine components, respectively (Supplemental Fig. S4, A and B). Among TFs regulating two to four components, members of the TetR and WhiB families predominated, mainly influencing T7SS components (Supplemental Fig. S4C). To assess transcriptional responses under stress, RNA sequencing data (37) were integrated with the secretion components. Starvation and SDS stress caused the most pronounced changes, with Sec and Tat components largely downregulated during starvation, whereas T7SS components were upregulated (Supplemental Fig. S4D).

Compromised Bacterial Survival upon secA1 and tatAC Depletion

T7SS systems in Mtb are extensively investigated in relation to other secretion pathways, specifically the Sec and Tat pathways. Therefore, in this report, we aim to focus on and investigate the SecA1 and Tat secretion pathways; thus, we selected SecA1 and TatA as the candidates. High-throughput transposon mutagenesis studies indicated that both secA1 and tatA are essential for in vitro growth in complete media (51); thus, we generated CRISPRi-mediated knockdown strains (30) (Rv-secA1dc and Rv-tatAdc) in H37Rv. Depletion of SecA1 and TatA upon ATc addition (day 4) resulted in impaired growth in vitro, as confirmed by Western blotting with α-SecA1 and α-TatA antibodies (Fig. 2, A and B). The CRISPRi system is known to cause polarity effects for the entire operon (30). SecA1 is a solo gene, while tatA and tatC form a two-gene operon, and both are essential in vitro. Although we were targeting only tatA, the addition of ATc led to decreased levels of both tatA and tatC (Fig. 2C). Thus, we used tatAgmut alongside tatC to complement Rv-tatAdc and generated complementation strains (Rv-tatAdc::tatAC) (Supplemental Fig. S5E). In the Rv-secA1dc + ATc strain, compromised growth was observed around ∼4 log10 fold as compared to Rv-vcdc + ATc after 4 days of depletion in vitro (Fig. 2D). While in the case of Rv-tatAdc + ATc, the growth defect was noticed around ∼3 log10 fold (Fig. 2E). In the peritoneal macrophages, the growth was compromised up to ∼2.5 log10 fold in Rv-secA1dc + ATc and ∼0.8 log10 fold in Rv-tatAdc + ATc as compared to Rv-vcdc + ATc control (Fig. 2, F and G). The functional complementation rescued the growth phenotype in both in vitro and ex vivo. We conclude that we successfully generated the Rv-secA1dc and Rv-tatAdc knockdown strains, indicating that secA1 and tatAC (tatA and tatC) are essential for bacterial survival.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Impact of bacterial survival upon secA1 and tatAC depletion.A, Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, and Rv-tatAdc were inoculated at A600 ∼0.1 and grown for 4 days in the presence and absence of ATc. The tubes represent the depletion of Rv-secA1dc and Rv-tatAdc as compared to Rv-vcdc. B, whole cell lysates were prepared from Rv-vcdc + ATc, Rv-secA1dc −/+ATc, and Rv-tatAdc −/+ATc from a fourth day culture. 50 μg of each protein lysate was resolved on 10% (SecA1) and 15% (TatA) SDS-PAGE, transferred to a Nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with α-SecA1 (for SecA1 depletion) and α-TatA (for TatA depletion) antibodies generated in the lab. α-GroEL1 antibody was used as a loading control. C, total RNA was isolated from Rv-vcdc −/+ATc, Rv-secA1dc −/+ATc and Rv-tatAdc −/+ATc from third day grown cultures for qRT-PCR. The expression of secA1, tatA, and tatC was normalized with respect to 16S rRNA, and the Fold Change (2-ΔΔCt) value (mean ± SD (n = 4)) was plotted using GraphPad Prism. The Statistical significance was analyzed using Two-way ANOVA ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001. D and E, the graph depicts the CFU of the in vitro survival of bacteria of Rv-vcdc−/+ATc, Rv-secA1dc−/+ATc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1 −/+ATc, Rv-tatAdc−/+ATc and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC −/+ATc on day 0, day 2 and fourth day post depletion. GraphPad Prism software was used to plot CFUs and perform statistical analysis using Two-way ANOVA. Two independent experiments were performed as biological replicates, and each experiment was conducted in triplicate. Data represents mean and ±SD, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. F and G, peritoneal macrophages, isolated from the mice peritoneum 4 days post thioglycolate injection, were infected with the Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1, Rv-tatAdc, and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC at 1:5 MOI. 4 h post-infection, CFUs were enumerated at 0h and 72h. Survival of the Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1, Rv-tatAdc, and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC in the present and absence of ATc were plotted using GraphPad Prism software and statistical analysis were performed using Two-way ANOVA. Two independent experiments were performed as biological replicates, and each experiment was conducted in triplicate. Data represents mean and ±SD, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. CFU, colony forming unit.

Change in the Secretome upon SecA1 and TatAC Depletion

In silico studies predict putative Sec or Tat substrates based on the presence of consensus SPs or twin-arginine motifs, respectively; no experimental studies confirm these predictions. To identify the SecA1-and Tat pathway mediated secretome, the supernatant of Rv-vcdc, Rv-secA1dc, and Rv-tatAdc strains was enriched for the CF proteins (38) and the pellet was processed for WCL (Supplemental Fig. S6A). When both the fractions were probed with α-PknB and α-Ag85 B antibodies (markers for membrane/WCL and secreted proteins), the absence of a band corresponding to PknB and the presence of Ag85 B bands in CF fractions (Supplemental Fig. S6B) are indicative of the lack of contamination from other fractions. Ag85 B is shown to be secreted through the SecA pathway (52). As anticipated, we observed lower Ag85 B levels upon SecA1 depletion; however, we also observed decreased Ag85 B levels upon TatAC depletion (Supplemental Fig. S6B).

As outlined in Figure 3A, processing the CF data yielded 1255 proteins present in all three samples; after applying the filters described in the methods, 932 proteins were retained. We hypothesized that the absence of SecA1 or TatAC would result in a substantial decrease in the number of secreted proteins compared to the Rv control. On the contrary, we observed a higher number of secreted proteins, including known cytosolic proteins, in both samples, suggesting changes in overall cellular homeostasis upon depletion (Supplemental Table S5). To minimize false positives and enhance confidence, 410 secretory proteins that were common between the current study and at least one other previously published study (four previous studies (53, 54, 55, 56)) were retained (Supplemental Fig. S6C). We obtained a total of 134 differentially secreted proteins in Rv-secA1dc + ATc (Fig. 3B) and 158 proteins for the Rv-tatAdc + ATc samples (Fig. 3C). Of these, 118 (58 higher and 60 lower abundances) and 138 (75 higher and 63 lower abundances) showed a p-value <0.05 in Rv-secA1dc + ATc and Rv-tatAdc + ATc samples, respectively (Supplemental Table S5) with 72 proteins common to both (Supplemental Fig. S6E). Proteins lowered only in Rv-secA1dc + ATc (27) or Rv-tatAdc + ATc (30) were considered to be probable SecA1 or Tat substrates, respectively, while 33 were shared, suggesting dual dependence or indirect effects (Supplemental Fig. S6D) such as changes in the cellular homeostasis. Among the 27 probable SecA1 specific proteins, 13 had SecA1 SP and SecA1 SP + LM (Fig. 3F). Of the 30 probable Tat pathway specific proteins, only five had Tat SP and Tat SP + LM (Fig. 3D). We speculate that depletion of the SecA1 and TatAC, altered the export of membrane stabilizing proteins, potentially compromising Mtb membrane integrity and leading to leakage of periplasmic or cytoplasmic proteins into the CF fraction. To address this, we investigated the changes in the membrane proteome upon SecA1 and TatAC depletion.

Mycobacterial Membrane Proteome Alteration owing to SecA1 and TatAC Depletion

The cytosolic and membrane fractions from Rv-vcdc + ATc, Rv-secA1dc + ATc, and Rv-tatAdc + ATc samples were probed with α-RpoA (a cytosolic marker) and α-PknB (a membrane marker) antibodies, respectively. As anticipated, PknB was detected in WCL and the membrane fraction but not in the cytosolic fraction, whereas RpoA was detected in WCL and the cytosolic fraction but not in the membrane fraction in Rv-vcdc + ATc samples. This suggested that the fractionation method was appropriate and yielded enrichment. However, in the fractions prepared from the Rv-secA1dc + ATc sample, RpoA was also detected in the membrane fraction. This was not the case in fractions prepared from Rv-tatAdc + ATc or in the control Rv-vcdc + ATc samples (Supplemental Fig. S7B).

A total of 2335 proteins were detected in the membrane fractions of Rv-vcdc + ATc, Rv-secA1dc + ATc, and Rv-tatAdc + ATc samples. To enhance confidence, we retained only those candidates that were common to both the current study and at least one other previously published study (filtered as shown in methods (22, 57), reducing the number to 943 proteins. A total of 260 proteins were differentially abundant in Rv-secA1dc + ATc (138 higher and 122 lower abundances) (Fig. 4A), and the number in Rv-tatAdc + ATc was much lower, accounting for 81 in total (31 high and 50 low abundance) (Fig. 4B). In addition, more cytosolic proteins were detected in the membrane fraction of Rv-secA1dc + ATc than in Rv-tatAdc + ATc. This was also reflected in the Western blot (Supplemental Fig. S7B), where cytosolic markers were detected in Rv-secA1dc + ATc samples, but not in Rv-tatAdc + ATc. A total of 32 differentially abundant proteins were common in both the samples; among these, Phenolpthiocerol synthesis type-I polyketide synthase, Proteasome beta subunit, Rv0455c, and Rv1896c were highly abundant in Rv-secA1dc + ATc, whereas they were low in Rv-tatAdc + ATc (Supplemental Table S6). Functional annotation of differentially abundant membrane fraction proteins showed that proteins belonging to cell wall and cell processes were low in abundance, while those involved in metabolic processes were high abundant in Rv-secA1dc + ATc (Fig. 4C). However, both cell wall and cell process proteins, along with metabolic process proteins, were low in abundance in Rv-tatAdc + ATc (Fig. 4D). Together, the data suggests that there may be a possible membrane dysbiosis in Rv-secA1dc + ATc samples, which may also be the case with Rv-tatAdc + ATc, but at a lower scale.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Membrane proteome of SecA1 and TatAC-depleted cells.A and B, the volcano plots representing the proteins detected in the samples (n = 3 replicates for each strain) affected by SecA1 and TatAC depletion using padj<0.05 and 1≥log2Fold Change ≤ −1. The purple dots depict low-abundance proteins, the orange dots high-abundance proteins, and the gray dots non-significant proteins. The chord plot depicts the differential abundances of high and low proteins upon the (C) SecA1-depleted condition and (D) TatAC-depleted condition grouped by functional categories.

SecA1 and TatAC Depletion Result in Mycobacterial Membrane Permeability

Figures 3 and 4 show significant alterations in the secretome and membrane proteome following SecA1 and TatAC depletion. Notably, several cytosolic proteins appeared in both fractions, and many proteins were shared between the two pathways. These observations suggest that SecA1 and, to a lesser extent, TatAC depletion may compromise membrane integrity. Scanning electron microscopy performed to investigate the phenotypic impact on cellular morphology showed bulged and elongated cells (>40% cells were >3 μm) upon SecA1 depletion, which could be restored by complementation (Figs. 5, A and B and Supplemental Fig. S8, A and C). While the cells were elongated (>10% cells were >4 μm) compared with Rv upon TatAC depletion, and did not show a bulged phenotype like Rv-secA1dc + ATc (Fig. 5, A and B and Supplemental Fig. S8B). To further investigate the effect of SecA1 and TatAC depletion on the ultrastructure of the Mtb membrane, we performed TEM. We observed that the architecture of the cell membrane was significantly altered upon SecA1 or TatAC depletion (Fig. 5C). However, we did not detect any membrane perforations, suggesting that the possible changes at this time point may be more subtle and possibly more permeable.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Alteration of the cellular morphology upon SecA1 and TatA depletion.A, scanning Electron Microscopy images of Rv-vcdc + ATc, Rv-secA1dc −/+ATc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1 +ATc, Rv-tatAdc −/+ATc, and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC + ATc. Rv-vcdc + ATc, Rv-secA1dc −/+ATc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1 +ATc, Rv-tatAdc −/+ATc, and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC + ATc were grown for 4 days post ATc addition, and cells were fixed and processed for Scanning Electron Microscopy.. Images of cell morphology were obtained by Scanning Electron Microscopy at 100,00× magnification. The scale bar represents 2 μm. B, cell length (μm) for both SecA1 and TatAC was measured, quantified using ImageJ software (https://imagej.net/ij/)and plotted using GraphPad Prism software. The statistical analysis was performed by One way ANOVA, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. C, transmission electron microscopy images of Rv-vcdc + ATc, Rv-secA1dc −/+ATc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1 +ATc, Rv-tatAdc −/+ATc, and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC + ATc. Rv-vcdc + ATc, Rv-secA1dc −/+ATc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1 +ATc, Rv-tatAdc −/+ATc, and Rv-tatAdc::tatAC + ATc were grown for 4 days post ATc addition, and cells were fixed and processed for transmission electron microscopy. The images of the cell membrane were taken at 450,00× magnification. Scale bar 200 nm. D, the graph represents the fluorescence Arbitrary Unit (A.U. x104) of EtBr uptake by the control Rv-vcdc + ATc, and the depleted cells i.e. Rv-pptr-B -pristi, Rv-secA1dc + ATc, Rv-secA1dc::secA1 +ATc, Rv-tatAdc + ATc, Rv-tatAdc::tatA + ATc strains at time points D0, D2, D3, and D4. The filled lines depict only EtBr uptake by the strains and the dotted lines depict the EtBr uptake in the presence of Verapamil. GraphPad Prism software was used to plot A.U.s at different time points and perform statistical analysis using Two-way ANOVA. Two independent experiments were performed as biological replicates, and each experiment was conducted in triplicate. Data represents mean and ±SD, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. E, the table depicts the % of PI+ cells and EtBr uptake (A.U. x104) by the Rv-vcdc + ATc, heat-killed Rv-vcdc, Rv-pptr-B -pristinamycin, Rv-secA1dc + ATc and Rv-tatAdc + ATc on day 0 and 4. Vp stands for addition of Verapamil (40 μg/ml). The values shown in the table was after deducting the background uptake observed with Rv-vcdc + ATc. Two independent biological experiments were performed, and the average values from the two independent experiments are shown in the table. EtBr, ethidium bromide.

To investigate changes in membrane permeability, we used heat-killed Rv-vcdc (HK-Rv-vcdc) cells as purposefully dead cells. We also used Rv-pptr-B (essential kinase PknB can be depleted upon withdrawing the inducer pristinamycin). PknB is known to regulate cell division and cell wall synthesis and hence can also serve as a control for cell death. We measured the EtBr fluorescence and plotted the relative values at different time points for Rv-vcdc + ATc, heat-killed Rv-vcdc (HK-Rv-vcdc), Rv-pptr-B -pristi (PknB Knockdown), Rv-secA1dc + ATc and Rv-tatAdc + ATc in the presence and absence of Verapamil (40 μg/ml) (Fig. 5D). We observed significant cell death with both SecA1 and TatAC depletion on day 5, and hence we limited our analysis to the first 4 days (day 0, day 2, day 3 and day 4).

On day 0, no death was observed in any strain, and accordingly, EtBr uptake was negligible (after deducting the background uptake observed with Rv-vcdc (Fig. 5, D and E and Supplemental Fig. S8, D and E). The addition of Verapamil increased EtBr fluorescence, clearly demonstrating that blocking efflux pumps increased accumulation in all cases. On day 4, uptake per se was higher, even in the control Rv-vcdc strain (Supplemental Fig. S8, D and E), and did not increase further upon Verapamil addition. This suggests that the mycobacterial membrane has become more permeable on day 4 compared with day 0, and that the impact of blocking efflux pumps is no longer apparent. HK-Rv-vcdc showed significant EtBr uptake, suggesting compromised membrane integrity due to cell death (80% death). Even though cell death observed upon PknB depletion (Rv-pptr-B -pristinamycin) is around 40%, it also showed EtBr uptake comparable to HK-Rv-vcdc (heat-killed Rv-vcdc). This may be due to both compromised membrane homeostasis and cell death. In the SecA1-depleted condition, cell death was 10 to 15%; however, EtBr uptake was ∼33% compared with HK-Rv-vcdc, suggesting that the accumulation is due to a combination of changes in membrane permeability and cell death. Importantly, in the case of TatAC depletion, we observed EtBr uptake of ∼33% compared with HK-Rv-vcdc, even though the observed cell death was only 2 to 3%, indicating that the observed uptake is mostly due to increased permeability.

Discussion

The first genome-scale model for protein secretion was developed for yeast, S. cerevisiae, using a bottom-up approach with the Protein Specific Information Matrix framework, providing a systems-level understanding of secretion machinery in eukaryotes (32). Subsequent studies have performed a genome-scale analysis of protein secretion systems in Aspergillus oryzae (58), humans (59, 60), mice (iMM1685s), and CHO cells (iCHO2048s) (60). In contrast, most available genome-scale models for prokaryotes primarily focus on metabolic pathways and lack detailed representations of protein secretion machineries and their regulation (61, 62, 63). The available metabolic models of Mtb (iNJ661 (64), GSMN-TB (65), iEK1011 (66), and sMtb2018 (67)) have not been extended to build an integrative model with a detailed mechanistic description of the protein secretion machinery at the systems level. While reports offer detailed mechanistic insights, the modular organization of T7SS (68) and the characterization of SecA2 (21) are available independently; however, a single, integrated reconstruction of Mtb secretion pathways (Sec, Tat, and ESX) has not been established. Here, we provided a pictorial and conceptual reconstruction of secretion systems in Mtb, encompassing 92 secretory components and 198 mechanistic reactions, to visualize the elements of the secretory machinery and their architecture within a systems-level model (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Figs. S1–S3). By integrating transcriptomic and ChIP-Seq datasets, we identified key transcription factors that regulate the expression of secretion system genes (Supplemental Fig. S4), revealing the dynamic regulatory networks that underpin their function, which was absent in most previous studies (68, 69, 70). In the future, our computational reconstruction of Mtb secretion systems can be expanded to create a proteome-constrained, genome-scale protein secretory model for Mtb, similar to the recently developed yeast model (71).

CRISPRi-mediated knockdown has limitations for operonic gene targets. While secA1 is a single-gene operon, the tatC gene is downstream of tatA. Our qRT-PCR experiments showed that the expression of both tatA and tatC was downregulated upon induction of guide RNA and dCas9 (Fig. 2C). Since both TatA and TatC function in the same secretion pathway, we did not attempt to create a specific TatA depletion strain by complementing with tatC at another integrative locus. The number of secretory proteins identified in several major studies ranged from 257 (53), 254 (54), 481 (56) to 932 in the current study, and the increased numbers may be due to technical improvements in the mass spectrometer’s sensitivity (Fig. 3). A prior study in M. marinum identified 30 proteins, including 24 PE/PPE proteins that depended on the presence of ESX-5 (72). Another study identified 66 proteins that were either more or less abundant in the ΔsecA2 mutant compared with the WT (22). Here, we report, for the first time, that secretion of 118 proteins was dependent on SecA1 and 138 on TatAC systems, respectively (Fig. 3). Interestingly, 72 proteins were commonly affected in both depletion strains (Supplemental Fig. S6), suggesting either shared pathway dependence or effects related to membrane perturbation. Upon SecA1 depletion, lipoproteins, which are typically localized to the membrane and contain classical Sec SPs, were found to be reduced in abundance (Fig. 3). Proteins like RipA, a PG endopeptidase (73), and Ami1, an amidase (74) necessary for maintaining PG synthesis, were also lower in abundance (Fig. 3). In Streptomyces coelicolor, the authors identified 43 Tat pathway substrates, 25 of which were validated using a sensitive agarase reporter assay (75). Mtb utilizes the Tat pathway to export various proteins, including enzymes, hydrolases, and proteins involved in cell wall processes (17). Tat-deficient mutants in Msm failed to export β-lactamases such as BlaS to the cell envelope, resulting in sensitivity to β-lactam antibiotics (76). Rv2525c also plays a role in maintaining cell wall integrity and stress adaptation in Mtb (77). We observed lower abundances of Rv2525c and PlcB proteins in the Tat-depleted secretome.

A total of 528 (78), 1417 (79), 1318 (22), and 1539 (57) membrane proteins were previously obtained from membrane proteome studies conducted by various groups, and 2335 were identified in our current study. This variation in the number may be due to the type of membrane fractionation methods and biological conditions used. Among 943 membrane proteins identified, 260 were differentially abundant in SecA1, and 81 were for TatAC depletion (Fig. 4). A previous study showed that 13 out of 15 solute binding proteins (SBPs), 12 out of 21 Mce transporter family members were reduced, and 13 out of 21 identified DosR-regulated proteins were increased in the ΔsecA2 mutant (22). Here, we observed that upon SecA1 depletion, metabolic proteins, mostly those involved in lipid degradation, were highly abundant, while cell wall synthesis proteins were less abundant (Fig. 4). A similar trend was observed in TatAC-depleted cells. A previous study showed the localization of LpqH, a membrane-anchored lipoprotein (80), which was also found to be lower in abundance upon SecA1 depletion in the membrane fraction, thus validating the result (Supplemental Fig. S7, C and D).

A notable outcome of this study is the detection of numerous cytosolic proteins in the secretome (Supplemental Fig. S6, D and E) and membrane proteome (Supplemental Fig. S7, C and D) following SecA1 or TatAC depletion. These proteins were not analyzed further because they were not part of the earlier studies. Our ultrastructural analyzes TEM and the EtBr and PI uptake data (Fig. 5 and Supplemental Fig. S8) indicate that increased uptake of EtBr is likely due to both cell death and increased permeability in the case of SecA1 depletion and largely due to compromised permeability in the case of TatAC depletion, leading to the unintended release of periplasmic and cytoplasmic proteins. In line with these observations, in the membrane proteomics data, we have observed that most of the transporters, including phosphate uptake (PstS1, PstS2, PstS3), nutrient ABC transporters (ModC, CysA1), and dicarboxylate transporters (DctA), are reduced in abundance in the membrane fraction of the SecA1-depleted cells (low abundance but not significant in TatAC). However, we have not observed reduced abundance of efflux pump proteins in the membrane fractions of both the depleted cells. While Sec and Tat pathways are mechanistically distinct, some proteins can utilize either pathway, reflecting SP flexibility (6) and crosstalk between pathways. These findings underscore the importance of coordination and regulatory interplay among secretion systems, which ensures balanced export of proteins critical for mycobacterial virulence, adaptation, and physiology.

Data Availability

The mass spectrometry data generated in this study have been deposited in PRIDE under accession PXD066777.

Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact (vinaykn@nii.ac.in or vinaykn.ccmb@csir.res.in) upon request.

Supplemental data

This article contains supplemental data (81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

Research in this publication was supported by the JC Bose Award (JCB/2019/000015), Govt of India, to V. K. N. V. K. N. and J. U. acknowledge the support from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) (Grant No. BT/PR50983/MED/29/1650/2023). V. K. N., P. S., and Y. B. acknowledge the support from the National Bar Institute of Health (NIH) (Grant No. 7R01A|142672-05). A. S. acknowledges funding from the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), Government of India, via the Apex project to the Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IMSc), Chennai. PS is an INSPIRE Fellow from the Department of Science & Technology (DST), Government of India (DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2018/F180904). We are grateful to A. Harikrishna, CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), for his assistance in microtome and TEM image acquisition. We thank the CCMB central research facilities: DNA Sequencing, BSL-3, Tissue Culture, Animal House (IAEC-25/2023), and Electron Microscopy, for providing access. The authors reviewed and edited all text and accept full responsibility for the content. No AI tools were used to generate or alter data, analyzes, results, or figures/images.

Author contributions

P. S., J. U., A. S., and V. K. N. writing-review and editing; P. S. and J. U. writing–original draft; P. S. and J. U. visualization; P. S. and J. U. validation; P. S., J. U., and V. K. N. project administration; P. S., J. U., Y. B., G. D. J., and N. A. methodology; P. S., J. U., A. S., and V. K. N. investigation; P. S., J. U., S. S., Y. B., S. K., S. V. R., and A. S. formal analysis; P. S., J. U., S. S., E. A. A., and A. S. data curation; P. S. conceptualization; J. U., S. S., and A. S. software; Y. B. formal analysis; V. K. N. supervision; V. K. N. resources; V. K. N. funding acquisition.

Footnotes

Present addresses for: Gagan Deep Jhingan, Valerian Chem Private Limited, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201301, India; Sidra Khan, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.

Contributor Information

Areejit Samal, Email: asamal@imsc.res.in.

Vinay Kumar Nandicoori, Email: vinaykn@nii.ac.in, vinaykn.ccmb@csir.res.in.

Supplementary Data

Figure S1.

Figure S1

Figure S2.

Figure S2

Figure S3.

Figure S3

Figure S4.

Figure S4

Figure S5.

Figure S5

Figure S6.

Figure S6

Figure S7.

Figure S7

Figure S8.

Figure S8

Table_S1
mmc1.xlsx (112.1KB, xlsx)
Table_S2
mmc2.xlsx (120.6KB, xlsx)
Table_S3
mmc3.xlsx (55.2KB, xlsx)
Table_S4
mmc4.xlsx (30.7KB, xlsx)
Table_S5
mmc5.xlsx (164.2KB, xlsx)
Table_S6
mmc6.xlsx (235.7KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Muniz M., Morsomme P., Riezman H. Protein sorting upon exit from the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 2001;104:313–320. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00215-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wickner W., Driessen A.J., Hartl F.U. The enzymology of protein translocation across the Escherichia coli plasma membrane. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1991;60:101–124. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.000533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Driessen A.J., Manting E.H., van der Does C. The structural basis of protein targeting and translocation in bacteria. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001;8:492–498. doi: 10.1038/88549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berks B.C., Palmer T., Sargent F. Protein targeting by the bacterial twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005;8:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fan E., Jakob M., Klosgen R.B. One signal is enough: stepwise transport of two distinct passenger proteins by the Tat pathway across the thylakoid membrane. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;398:438–443. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.06.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Natale P., Bruser T., Driessen A.J. Sec- and Tat-mediated protein secretion across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane--distinct translocases and mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1778:1735–1756. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Feltcher M.E., Sullivan J.T., Braunstein M. Protein export systems of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: novel targets for drug development? Future Microbiol. 2010;5:1581–1597. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chatzi K.E., Sardis M.F., Tsirigotaki A., Koukaki M., Sostaric N., Konijnenberg A., et al. Preprotein mature domains contain translocase targeting signals that are essential for secretion. J. Cell Biol. 2017;216:1357–1369. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201609022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller B.K., Zulauf K.E., Braunstein M. The Sec pathways and exportomes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017;5 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBTB2-0013-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Champion P.A., Cox J.S. Protein secretion systems in Mycobacteria. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:1376–1384. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00943.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ligon L.S., Rigel N.W., Romanchuk A., Jones C.D., Braunstein M. Suppressor analysis reveals a role for SecY in the SecA2-dependent protein export pathway of Mycobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 2013;195:4456–4465. doi: 10.1128/JB.00630-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thakur P., Gantasala N.P., Choudhary E., Singh N., Abdin M.Z., Agarwal N. The preprotein translocase YidC controls respiratory metabolism in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci. Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep24998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hou J.M., D'Lima N.G., Rigel N.W., Gibbons H.S., McCann J.R., Braunstein M., et al. ATPase activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA1 and SecA2 proteins and its importance for SecA2 function in macrophages. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190:4880–4887. doi: 10.1128/JB.00412-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ollinger J., O'Malley T., Ahn J., Odingo J., Parish T. Inhibition of the sole type I signal peptidase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is bactericidal under replicating and nonreplicating conditions. J. Bacteriol. 2012;194:2614–2619. doi: 10.1128/JB.00224-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frobel J., Rose P., Muller M. Twin-arginine-dependent translocation of folded proteins. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012;367:1029–1046. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Frain K.M., Robinson C., van Dijl J.M. Transport of folded proteins by the tat system. Protein J. 2019;38:377–388. doi: 10.1007/s10930-019-09859-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McDonough J.A., McCann J.R., Tekippe E.M., Silverman J.S., Rigel N.W., Braunstein M. Identification of functional Tat signal sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190:6428–6438. doi: 10.1128/JB.00749-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ize B., Stanley N.R., Buchanan G., Palmer T. Role of the Escherichia coli Tat pathway in outer membrane integrity. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;48:1183–1193. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Braunstein M., Brown A.M., Kurtz S., Jacobs W.R., Jr. Two nonredundant SecA homologues function in mycobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:6979–6990. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.24.6979-6990.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Swanson S., Ioerger T.R., Rigel N.W., Miller B.K., Braunstein M., Sacchettini J.C. Structural similarities and differences between two functionally distinct SecA proteins, Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA1 and SecA2. J. Bacteriol. 2015;198:720–730. doi: 10.1128/JB.00696-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Braunstein M., Espinosa B.J., Chan J., Belisle J.T., Jacobs W.R., Jr. SecA2 functions in the secretion of superoxide dismutase A and in the virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;48:453–464. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Feltcher M.E., Gunawardena H.P., Zulauf K.E., Malik S., Griffin J.E., Sassetti C.M., et al. Label-free quantitative proteomics reveals a role for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 pathway in exporting solute binding proteins and mce transporters to the cell wall. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2015;14:1501–1516. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.044685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lochab S., Singh Y., Sengupta S., Nandicoori V.K. Mycobacterium tuberculosis exploits host ATM kinase for survival advantage through SecA2 secretome. Elife. 2020;9 doi: 10.7554/eLife.51466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zulauf K.E., Sullivan J.T., Braunstein M. The SecA2 pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exports effectors that work in concert to arrest phagosome and autophagosome maturation. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou W., Hao B., Bricker T.M., Theg S.M. A real-time analysis of protein transport via the twin arginine translocation pathway in response to different components of the protonmotive force. J. Biol. Chem. 2023;299 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rivera-Calzada A., Famelis N., Llorca O., Geibel S. Type VII secretion systems: structure, functions and transport models. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021;19:567–584. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00560-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Unnikrishnan M., Constantinidou C., Palmer T., Pallen M.J. The enigmatic esx proteins: looking beyond mycobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:192–204. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Roy S., Ghatak D., Das P., BoseDasgupta S. ESX secretion system: the gatekeepers of mycobacterial survivability and pathogenesis. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. (Bp) 2020;10:202–209. doi: 10.1556/1886.2020.00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sankey N., Merrick H., Singh P., Rogers J., Reddi A., Hartson S.D., et al. Role of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-4 secretion system in heme iron utilization and pore formation by PPE proteins. mSphere. 2023;8 doi: 10.1128/msphere.00573-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Choudhary E., Thakur P., Pareek M., Agarwal N. Gene silencing by CRISPR interference in mycobacteria. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6267. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Forti F., Crosta A., Ghisotti D. Pristinamycin-inducible gene regulation in mycobacteria. J. Biotechnol. 2009;140:270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Feizi A., Osterlund T., Petranovic D., Bordel S., Nielsen J. Genome-scale modeling of the protein secretory machinery in yeast. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Samal A., Craig J.P., Coradetti S.T., Benz J.P., Eddy J.A., Price N.D., et al. Network reconstruction and systems analysis of plant cell wall deconstruction by Neurospora crassa. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2017;10:225. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0901-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Teufel F., Almagro Armenteros J.J., Johansen A.R., Gislason M.H., Pihl S.I., Tsirigos K.D., et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022;40:1023–1025. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dai W., Li J., Li Q., Cai J., Su J., Stubenrauch C., et al. PncsHub: a platform for annotating and analyzing non-classically secreted proteins in Gram-positive bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D848–D857. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Minch K.J., Rustad T.R., Peterson E.J., Winkler J., Reiss D.J., Ma S., et al. The DNA-binding network of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:5829. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Khan M.Z., Hunt D.M., Singha B., Kapoor Y., Singh N.K., Prasad D.V.S., et al. Divergent downstream biosynthetic pathways are supported by L-cysteine synthases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Elife. 2024;12 doi: 10.7554/eLife.91970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sanyal P., Nandicoori V.K. Preparation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture filtrate to understand TB pathogenesis. J. Vis. Exp. 2025 doi: 10.3791/67540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.UniProt C. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D523–D531. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cox J., Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jhingan G.D., Kumari S., Jamwal S.V., Kalam H., Arora D., Jain N., et al. Comparative proteomic analyses of avirulent, virulent, and clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis identify strain-specific patterns. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:14257–14273. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.666123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kapopoulou A., Lew J.M., Cole S.T. The MycoBrowser portal: a comprehensive and manually annotated resource for mycobacterial genomes. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2011;91:8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ritchie M.E., Phipson B., Wu D., Hu Y., Law C.W., Shi W., et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brunson J.C. Ggalluvial: layered grammar for alluvial plots. J. Open Source Softw. 2020;5 doi: 10.21105/joss.02017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gu Z., Gu L., Eils R., Schlesner M., Brors B. Circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2811–2812. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Miller B.K., Hughes R., Ligon L.S., Rigel N.W., Malik S., Anjuwon-Foster B.R., et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis SatS is a chaperone for the SecA2 protein export pathway. Elife. 2019;8 doi: 10.7554/eLife.40063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Abdallah A.M., Bestebroer J., Savage N.D., de Punder K., van Zon M., Wilson L., et al. Mycobacterial secretion systems ESX-1 and ESX-5 play distinct roles in host cell death and inflammasome activation. J. Immunol. 2011;187:4744–4753. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tran H.R., Grebenc D.W., Klein T.A., Whitney J.C. Bacterial type VII secretion: an important player in host-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions. Mol. Microbiol. 2021;115:478–489. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Groschel M.I., Sayes F., Simeone R., Majlessi L., Brosch R. ESX secretion systems: mycobacterial evolution to counter host immunity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:677–691. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Turkarslan S., Peterson E.J., Rustad T.R., Minch K.J., Reiss D.J., Morrison R., et al. A comprehensive map of genome-wide gene regulation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci. Data. 2015;2 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ju X., Li S., Froom R., Wang L., Lilic M., Delbeau M., et al. Incomplete transcripts dominate the Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcriptome. Nature. 2024;627:424–430. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07105-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nisa A., Counoupas C., Pinto R., Britton W.J., Triccas J.A. Characterization of the protective immune responses conferred by recombinant BCG overexpressing components of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Sec protein export system. Vaccines (Basel) 2022;10 doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Malen H., Berven F.S., Fladmark K.E., Wiker H.G. Comprehensive analysis of exported proteins from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Proteomics. 2007;7:1702–1718. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200600853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.de Souza G.A., Leversen N.A., Malen H., Wiker H.G. Bacterial proteins with cleaved or uncleaved signal peptides of the general secretory pathway. J. Proteomics. 2011;75:502–510. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mehra A., Zahra A., Thompson V., Sirisaengtaksin N., Wells A., Porto M., et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis type VII secreted effector EsxH targets host ESCRT to impair trafficking. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Malakar B., Chauhan K., Sanyal P., Naz S., Kalam H., Vivek-Ananth R.P., et al. Phosphorylation of CFP10 modulates Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. mBio. 2023;14 doi: 10.1128/mbio.01232-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Palande A., Patil S., Veeram A., Sahoo S.S., Lodhiya T., Maurya P., et al. Proteomic analysis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis outer membrane for potential implications in uptake of small molecules. ACS Infect. Dis. 2024;10:890–906. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Celinska E., Nicaud J.M. Filamentous fungi-like secretory pathway strayed in a yeast system: peculiarities of Yarrowia lipolytica secretory pathway underlying its extraordinary performance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019;103:39–52. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9450-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Feizi A., Gatto F., Uhlen M., Nielsen J. Human protein secretory pathway genes are expressed in a tissue-specific pattern to match processing demands of the secretome. NPJ Syst. Biol. Appl. 2017;3:22. doi: 10.1038/s41540-017-0021-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gutierrez J.M., Feizi A., Li S., Kallehauge T.B., Hefzi H., Grav L.M., et al. Genome-scale reconstructions of the mammalian secretory pathway predict metabolic costs and limitations of protein secretion. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:68. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13867-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sertbas M., Ulgen K.O. Genome-scale metabolic modeling for unraveling molecular mechanisms of high threat pathogens. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.566702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Durot M., Bourguignon P.Y., Schachter V. Genome-scale models of bacterial metabolism: reconstruction and applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009;33:164–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00146.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Passi A., Tibocha-Bonilla J.D., Kumar M., Tec-Campos D., Zengler K., Zuniga C. Genome-scale metabolic modeling enables In-Depth understanding of big data. Metabolites. 2021;12 doi: 10.3390/metabo12010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bordbar A., Lewis N.E., Schellenberger J., Palsson B.O., Jamshidi N. Insight into human alveolar macrophage and M. tuberculosis interactions via metabolic reconstructions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010;6:422. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Beste D.J., Hooper T., Stewart G., Bonde B., Avignone-Rossa C., Bushell M.E., et al. GSMN-TB: a web-based genome-scale network model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis metabolism. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R89. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kavvas E.S., Seif Y., Yurkovich J.T., Norsigian C., Poudel S., Greenwald W.W., et al. Updated and standardized genome-scale reconstruction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, iEK1011, simulates flux states indicative of physiological conditions. BMC Syst. Biol. 2018;12:25. doi: 10.1186/s12918-018-0557-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lopez-Agudelo V.A., Mendum T.A., Laing E., Wu H., Baena A., Barrera L.F., et al. A systematic evaluation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome-scale metabolic networks. PLos Comput. Biol. 2020;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shah S., Briken V. Modular organization of the ESX-5 secretion system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2016;6:49. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pal R., Bisht M.K., Mukhopadhyay S. Secretory proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their roles in modulation of host immune responses: focus on therapeutic targets. FEBS J. 2022;289:4146–4171. doi: 10.1111/febs.16369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tsirigotaki A., De Geyter J., Sostaric N., Economou A., Karamanou S. Protein export through the bacterial Sec pathway. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017;15:21–36. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Li F., Chen Y., Qi Q., Wang Y., Yuan L., Huang M., et al. Improving recombinant protein production by yeast through genome-scale modeling using proteome constraints. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:2969. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30689-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ates L.S., Ummels R., Commandeur S., van de Weerd R., Sparrius M., Weerdenburg E., et al. Essential role of the ESX-5 secretion system in outer membrane permeability of pathogenic mycobacteria. Plos Genet. 2015;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kwon K.W., Choi H.G., Choi H.H., Choi E., Kim H., Kim H.J., et al. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of RipA, a peptidoglycan hydrolase, against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing outbreak strains. Vaccine. 2024;42:1941–1952. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Healy C., Gouzy A., Ehrt S. Peptidoglycan hydrolases RipA and Ami1 are critical for replication and persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the host. mBio. 2020;11 doi: 10.1128/mBio.03315-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Widdick D.A., Dilks K., Chandra G., Bottrill A., Naldrett M., Pohlschroder M., et al. The twin-arginine translocation pathway is a major route of protein export in Streptomyces coelicolor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:17927–17932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607025103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.McDonough J.A., Hacker K.E., Flores A.R., Pavelka M.S., Jr., Braunstein M. The twin-arginine translocation pathway of Mycobacterium smegmatis is functional and required for the export of mycobacterial beta-lactamases. J. Bacteriol. 2005;187:7667–7679. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.22.7667-7679.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bellinzoni M., Haouz A., Miras I., Magnet S., Andre-Leroux G., Mukherjee R., et al. Structural studies suggest a peptidoglycan hydrolase function for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis tat-secreted protein Rv2525c. J. Struct. Biol. 2014;188:156–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2014.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wolfe L.M., Mahaffey S.B., Kruh N.A., Dobos K.M. Proteomic definition of the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Proteome Res. 2010;9:5816–5826. doi: 10.1021/pr1005873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Malen H., Pathak S., Softeland T., de Souza G.A., Wiker H.G. Definition of novel cell envelope associated proteins in Triton X-114 extracts of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gunawardena H.P., Feltcher M.E., Wrobel J.A., Gu S., Braunstein M., Chen X. Comparison of the membrane proteome of virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the attenuated Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine strain by label-free quantitative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2013;12:5463–5474. doi: 10.1021/pr400334k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Asthana P., Singh D., Pedersen J.S., Hynönen M.J., Sulu R., Murthy A.V., et al. Structural insights into the substrate-binding proteins Mce1A and Mce4A from. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. IUCrJ. 2021:757–774. doi: 10.1107/S2052252521006199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bandyopadhyay A., Saxena A.K. Structural and ATPase activity analysis of nucleotide binding domain of Rv3870 enzyme of M. tuberculosis ESX-1 system. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;189:879–889. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Beckert B., Kedrov A., Sohmen D., Kempf G., Wild K., Sinning I., et al. Translational arrest by a prokaryotic signal recognition particle is mediated by RNA interactions. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22:767–773. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Beckham K.S., Ciccarelli L., Bunduc C.M., Mertens H.D., Ummels R., Lugmayr W., et al. Structure of the mycobacterial ESX-5 type VII secretion system membrane complex by single-particle analysis. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:17047. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Belin D., Plaia G., Boulfekhar Y., Silva F. Escherichia coli SecG is required for residual export mediated by mutant signal sequences and for SecY-SecE complex stability. J Bacteriol. 2015;197:542–552. doi: 10.1128/JB.02136-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bernal-Cabas M., Miethke M., Antelo-Varela M., Aguilar Suárez R., Neef J., Schön L., et al. Functional association of the stress-responsive LiaH protein and the minimal TatAyCy protein translocase in Bacillus subtilis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2020;1867:118719. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bitter W., Houben E.N., Bottai D., Brodin P., Brown E.J., Cox J.S., et al. Systematic genetic nomenclature for type VII secretion systems. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Blaudeck N., Kreutzenbeck P., Müller M., Sprenger G.A., Freudl R. Isolation and characterization of bifunctional Escherichia coli TatA mutant proteins that allow efficient tat-dependent protein translocation in the absence of TatB. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:3426–3432. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411210200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bordes P., Cirinesi A.M., Ummels R., Sala A., Sakr S., Bitter W., et al. SecB-like chaperone controls a toxin-antitoxin stress-responsive system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:8438–8443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101189108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bottai D., Di Luca M., Majlessi L., Frigui W., Simeone R., Sayes F., et al. Disruption of the ESX-5 system of Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes loss of PPE protein secretion, reduction of cell wall integrity and strong attenuation. Mol Microbiol. 2012;83:1195–1209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bradshaw N., Walter P. The signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA links conformational changes in the SRP to protein targeting. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:2728–2734. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Brodin P., Majlessi L., Marsollier L., de Jonge M.I., Bottai D., Demangel C., et al. Dissection of ESAT-6 system 1 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and impact on immunogenicity and virulence. Infect Immun. 2006;74:88–98. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.1.88-98.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Brülle J.K., Tschumi A., Sander P. Lipoproteins of slow-growing Mycobacteria carry three fatty acids and are N-acylated by apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase BCG_2070c. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Buskiewicz I., Kubarenko A., Peske F., Rodnina M.V., Wintermeyer W. Domain rearrangement of SRP protein Ffh upon binding 4.5S RNA and the SRP receptor FtsY. Rna. 2005;11:947–957. doi: 10.1261/rna.7242305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Buskiewicz I., Peske F., Wieden H.J., Gryczynski I., Rodnina M.V., Wintermeyer W. Conformations of the signal recognition particle protein Ffh from Escherichia coli as determined by FRET. J Mol Biol. 2005;351:417–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Chilukoti N., Kumar C.M., Mande S.C. GroEL2 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals the importance of structural pliability in chaperonin function. J Bacteriol. 2016;198:486–497. doi: 10.1128/JB.00844-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.D’Lima N.G., Teschke C.M. ADP-dependent conformational changes distinguish Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 from SecA1. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:2307–2317. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.533323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dajkovic A., Hinde E., MacKichan C., Carballido-Lopez R. Dynamic organization of SecA and SecY secretion complexes in the B. subtilis membrane. PLoS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Das C., Ghosh T.S., Mande S.S. Computational analysis of the ESX-1 region of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: insights into the mechanism of type VII secretion system. PLoS One. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Di Luca M., Bottai D., Batoni G., Orgeur M., Aulicino A., Counoupas C., et al. The ESX-5 associated eccB-EccC locus is essential for Mycobacterium tuberculosis viability. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Dong L., Yang S., Chen J., Wu X., Sun D., Song C., et al. Structural basis of SecA-mediated protein translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208070120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Draycheva A., Bornemann T., Ryazanov S., Lakomek N.A., Wintermeyer W. The bacterial SRP receptor, FtsY, is activated on binding to the translocon. Mol Microbiol. 2016;102:152–167. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Fan D., Liu L., Zhu L., Peng F., Zhou Q., Liu C. Global analysis of the impact of deleting trigger factor on the transcriptome profile of Escherichia coli. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118:141–153. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Fang J., Wei Y. Expression, purification and characterization of the Escherichia coli integral membrane protein YajC. Protein Pept Lett. 2011;18:601–608. doi: 10.2174/092986611795222713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Feltcher M.E., Gibbons H.S., Ligon L.S., Braunstein M. Protein export by the mycobacterial SecA2 system is determined by the preprotein mature domain. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:672–681. doi: 10.1128/JB.02032-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Fiedler S.M., Graumann P.L. B. subtilis Sec and Srp systems show dynamic adaptations to different conditions of protein secretion. Cells. 2024;13 doi: 10.3390/cells13050377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Fortune S.M., Jaeger A., Sarracino D.A., Chase M.R., Sassetti C.M., Sherman D.R., et al. Mutually dependent secretion of proteins required for mycobacterial virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:10676–10681. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504922102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Gaur A., Sharma V.K., Shree S., Rai N., Ramachandran R. Characterization of EccA3, a CbbX family ATPase from the ESX-3 secretion pathway of M. tuberculosis. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2017;1865:715–724. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Guillet V., Bordes P., Bon C., Marcoux J., Gervais V., Sala A.J., et al. Structural insights into chaperone addiction of toxin-antitoxin systems. Nat Commun. 2019;10:782. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08747-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Harris A.J., Goldman A.D. The very early evolution of protein translocation across membranes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Hou J.M., D’Lima N.G., Rigel N.W., Gibbons H.S., McCann J.R., Braunstein M., et al. ATPase activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA1 and SecA2 proteins and its importance for SecA2 function in macrophages. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:4880–4887. doi: 10.1128/JB.00412-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hu Y., Henderson B., Lund P.A., Tormay P., Ahmed M.T., Gurcha S.S., et al. A Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutant lacking the groEL homologue cpn60.1 is viable but fails to induce an inflammatory response in animal models of infection. Infect Immun. 2008;76:1535–1546. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01078-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Hwang F.u., Huang Y.H., Shen W.Y.C., Groves K., Miller J.T., Shan S.O. Two-step membrane binding by the bacterial SRP receptor enable efficient and accurate Co-translational protein targeting. Elife. 2017;6 doi: 10.7554/eLife.25885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Joshi S.A., Ball D.A., Sun M.G., Carlsson F., Watkins B.Y., Aggarwal N., et al. EccA1, a component of the Mycobacterium marinum ESX-1 protein virulence factor secretion pathway, regulates mycolic acid lipid synthesis. Chem Biol. 2012;19:372–380. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Karniel A., Mrusek D., Steinchen W., Dym O., Bange G., Bibi E. Co-translational folding intermediate dictates membrane targeting of the signal recognition particle receptor. J Mol Biol. 2018;430:1607–1620. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kempf G., Stjepanovic G., Sloan J., Hendricks A., Lapouge K., Sinning I. The Escherichia coli SRP Receptor Forms a Homodimer at the Membrane. Structure. 2018;26:1440–1450.e1445. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2018.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Komar J., Alvira S., Schulze R.J., Martin R., Lycklama A.N.J.A., Lee S.C., et al. Membrane protein insertion and assembly by the bacterial holo-translocon SecYEG-SecDF-YajC-YidC. Biochem J. 2016;473:3341–3354. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kramer G., Rutkowska A., Wegrzyn R.D., Patzelt H., Kurz T.A., Merz F., et al. Functional dissection of Escherichia coli trigger factor: unraveling the function of individual domains. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:3777–3784. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3777-3784.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kuhn P., Weiche B., Sturm L., Sommer E., Drepper F., Warscheid B., et al. The bacterial SRP receptor, SecA and the ribosome use overlapping binding sites on the SecY translocon. Traffic. 2011;12:563–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Laencina L., Dubois V., Le Moigne V., Viljoen A., Majlessi L., Pritchard J., et al. Identification of genes required for Mycobacterium abscessus growth in vivo with a prominent role of the ESX-4 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E1002–e1011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713195115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Lagune M., Le Moigne V., Johansen M.D., Vásquez Sotomayor F., Daher W., Petit C., et al. The ESX-4 substrates, EsxU and EsxT, modulate Mycobacterium abscessus fitness. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Electrostatics and intrinsic disorder drive translocon binding of the SRP receptor FtsY. Angew Chem Int. Lakomek N.A., Draycheva A., Bornemann T., Wintermeyer W., editors. Engl. 2016;55:9544–9547. doi: 10.1002/anie.201602905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Legood S., Seng D., Boneca I.G., Buddelmeijer N. A Defect in lipoprotein modification by Lgt leads to abnormal morphology and cell death in Escherichia coli that Is independent of major lipoprotein Lpp. J Bacteriol. 2022;204 doi: 10.1128/jb.00164-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ligon L.S., Rigel N.W., Romanchuk A., Jones C.D., Braunstein M. Suppressor analysis reveals a role for SecY in the SecA2-dependent protein export pathway of Mycobacteria. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:4456–4465. doi: 10.1128/JB.00630-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Lu Z., Wang H., Yu T. The SecB-like chaperone Rv1957 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: crystallization and X-ray crystallographic analysis. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2016;72:457–461. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X16007287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Lupoli T.J., Fay A., Adura C., Glickman M.S., Nathan C.F. Reconstitution of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteostasis network highlights essential cofactor interactions with chaperone DnaK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E7947–e7956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617644113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Luthra A., Gaur A., Ramachandran R. Rv3868 (EccA1), an essential component of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-1 secretion system, is thermostable. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1834:1181–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Lycklama a Nijeholt J.A., de Keyzer J., Prabudiansyah I., Driessen A.J. Characterization of the supporting role of SecE in protein translocation. FEBS Lett. 2013;587:3083–3088. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.MacGurn J.A., Raghavan S., Stanley S.A., Cox J.S. A non-RD1 gene cluster is required for Snm secretion in. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57:1653–1663. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Mao C., Bariya P., Suo Y., Randall L.L. Comparison of single and multiple turnovers of SecYEG in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2020:202. doi: 10.1128/JB.00462-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Martin R., Larsen A.H., Corey R.A., Midtgaard S.R., Frielinghaus H., Schaffitzel C., et al. Structure and dynamics of the central lipid pool and proteins of the bacterial holo-translocon. Biophys J. 2019;116:1931–1940. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Matavacas J., Hallgren J., von Wachenfeldt C. Bacillus subtilis forms twisted cells with cell wall integrity defects upon removal of the molecular chaperones DnaK and trigger factor. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:988768. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.988768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Mercier E., Holtkamp W., Rodnina M.V., Wintermeyer W. Signal recognition particle binds to translating ribosomes before emergence of a signal anchor sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:11858–11866. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Miller B.K., Hughes R., Ligon L.S., Rigel N.W., Malik S., Anjuwon-Foster B.R., et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis SatS is a chaperone for the SecA2 protein export pathway. Elife. 2019;8 doi: 10.7554/eLife.40063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Miller B.K., Zulauf K.E., Braunstein M. The Sec Pathways and. Exportomes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBTB2-0013-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Mircheva M., Boy D., Weiche B., Hucke F., Graumann P., Koch H.G. Predominant membrane localization is an essential feature of the bacterial signal recognition particle receptor. BMC Biol. 2009;7:76. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Miyazaki R., Yura T., Suzuki T., Dohmae N., Mori H., Akiyama Y. A Novel SRP recognition sequence in the homeostatic control region of heat shock transcription factor σ32. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24147. doi: 10.1038/srep24147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Musik J.E., Poole J., Day C.J., Haselhorst T., Jen F.E., Ve T., et al. New perspectives on Escherichia coli signal peptidase I substrate specificity: investigating why the TasA cleavage site Is incompatible with LepB cleavage. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05005-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Musik J.E., Zalucki Y.M., Day C.J., Jennings M.P. Expression of the Bacillus subtilis TasA signal peptide leads to cell death in Escherichia coli due to inefficient cleavage by LepB. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2021;1863:183768. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Neef J., Bongiorni C., Schmidt B., Goosens V.J., van Dijl J.M. Relative contributions of non-essential Sec pathway components and cell envelope-associated proteases to high-level enzyme secretion by Bacillus subtilis. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19:52. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01315-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Nelson B., Soper N., Lupoli T.J. Bacterial J-domains with C-terminal tags contact the substrate binding domain of DnaK and sequester chaperone activity. Chembiochem. 2023;24 doi: 10.1002/cbic.202300261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Ojha A., Anand M., Bhatt A., Kremer L., Jacobs W.R., Jr., Hatful G.F. GroEL1: a dedicated chaperone involved in mycolic acid biosynthesis during biofilm formation in mycobacteria. Cell. 2005;123:861–874. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Ollinger J., O’Malley T., Ahn J., Odingo J., Parish T. Inhibition of the sole type I signal peptidase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is bactericidal under replicating and nonreplicating conditions. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:2614–2619. doi: 10.1128/JB.00224-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Palaniyandi K., Veerasamy M., Narayanan S. Characterization of Ffh of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its interaction with 4.5S RNA. Microbiol Res. 2012;167:520–525. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Pandey S., Sharma A., Tripathi D., Kumar A., Khubaib M., Bhuwan M., et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis peptidyl-prolyl isomerases also exhibit chaperone like activity in-vitro and in-vivo. PLoS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Pandey S., Tripathi D., Khubaib M., Kumar A., Sheikh J.A., Sumanlatha G., et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis peptidyl-prolyl isomerases are immunogenic, alter cytokine profile and aid in intracellular survival. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:38. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Peschke M., Le Goff M., Koningstein G.M., Karyolaimos A., de Gier J.W., van Ulsen P., et al. FtsY, DnaK and YidC are required for the biogenesis of the E. coli tail-anchored membrane proteins DjlC and Flk. J Mol Biol. 2018;430:389–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Petrilli J.D., Müller I., Araújo L.E., Cardoso T.M., Carvalho L.P., Barros B.C., et al. Differential host pro-inflammatory response to mycobacterial cell wall lipids regulated by the Mce1 operon. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1848. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Petriman N.A., Jauß B., Hufnagel A., Franz L., Sachelaru I., Drepper F., et al. The interaction network of the YidC insertase with the SecYEG translocon, SRP and the SRP receptor FtsY. Sci Rep. 2018;8:578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-19019-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Phan T.H., van Leeuwen L.M., Kuijl C., Ummels R., van Stempvoort G., Rubio-Canalejas A., et al. EspH is a hypervirulence factor for Mycobacterium marinum and essential for the secretion of the ESX-1 substrates EspE and EspF. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Piton J., Pojer F., Wakatsuki S., Gati C., Cole S.T. High resolution CryoEM structure of the ring-shaped virulence factor EspB from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Struct Biol X. 2020;4:100029. doi: 10.1016/j.yjsbx.2020.100029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Poweleit N., Czudnochowski N., Nakagawa R., Trinidad D.D., Murphy K.C., Sassetti C.M., et al. The structure of the endogenous ESX-3 secretion system. Elife. 2019;8 doi: 10.7554/eLife.52983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Prabudiansyah I., Kusters I., Driessen A.J. In vitro interaction of the housekeeping SecA1 with the accessory SecA2 protein of mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Prest R.J., Korotkov K.V., Champion P.A. The regulatory functions of ESX-1 substrates, EspE and EspF, are separable from secretion. J Bacteriol. 2024;206 doi: 10.1128/jb.00271-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Randall L.L., Henzl M.T. Direct identification of the site of binding on the chaperone SecB for the amino terminus of the translocon motor SecA. Protein Sci. 2010;19:1173–1179. doi: 10.1002/pro.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Rawat S., Zhu L., Lindner E., Dalbey R.E., White S.H. SecA drives transmembrane insertion of RodZ, an unusual single-span membrane protein. J Mol Biol. 2015;427:1023–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Rigel N.W., Gibbons H.S., McCann J.R., McDonough J.A., Kurtz S., Braunstein M. The accessory SecA2 system of Mycobacteria requires ATP binding and the canonical SecA1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:9927–9936. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900325200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Saint-Joanis B., Demangel C., Jackson M., Brodin P., Marsollier L., Boshoff H., et al. Inactivation of Rv2525c, a substrate of the twin arginine translocation (Tat) system of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, increases beta-lactam susceptibility and virulence. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:6669–6679. doi: 10.1128/JB.00631-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Sala A.J., Bordes P., Ayala S., Slama N., Tranier S., Coddeville M., et al. Directed evolution of SecB chaperones toward toxin-antitoxin systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:12584–12589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710456114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Sala C., Odermatt N.T., Soler-Arnedo P., Gülen M.F., von Schultz S., Benjak A., et al. EspL is essential for virulence and stabilizes EspE, EspF and EspH levels in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Sander P., Rezwan M., Walker B., Rampini S.K., Kroppenstedt R.M., Ehlers S., et al. Lipoprotein processing is required for virulence of. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 2004;52:1543–1552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Sanganna Gari R.R., Chattrakun K., Marsh B.P., Mao C., Chada N., Randall L.L., et al. Direct visualization of the E. coli Sec translocase engaging precursor proteins in lipid bilayers. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaav9404. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav9404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Schulze R.J., Komar J., Botte M., Allen W.J., Whitehouse S., Gold V.A., et al. Membrane protein insertion and proton-motive-force-dependent secretion through the bacterial holo-translocon SecYEG-SecDF-YajC-YidC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:4844–4849. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315901111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Sharma A.K., Mal S., Sahu S.K., Bagchi S., Majumder D., Chakravorty D., et al. Mycobacterial peptidyl prolyl isomerase A activates STING-TBK1-IRF3 signaling to promote IFNβ release in macrophages. Febs j. 2025;292:94–114. doi: 10.1111/febs.17261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Shivangi, Ekka M.K, Meena L.S. Essential biochemical, biophysical and computational inputs on efficient functioning of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H(37)Rv FtsY. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;171:59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Shivangi, Meena L.S. A multifactorial assessment of the SRP pathway constituent FtsY as a vital mycobacterial constituent. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2022;69:2445–2453. doi: 10.1002/bab.2294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Siegrist M.S., Steigedal M., Ahmad R., Mehra A., Dragset M.S., Schuster B.M., et al. Mycobacterial Esx-3 requires multiple components for iron acquisition. mBio. 2014;5:e01073–01014. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01073-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Soler-Arnedo P., Sala C., Zhang M., Cole S.T., Piton J. Polarly localized EccE(1) Is required for ESX-1 function and stabilization of ESX-1 membrane proteins in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 2020:202. doi: 10.1128/JB.00662-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Song H., Sandie R., Wang Y., Andrade-Navarro M.A., Niederweis M. Identification of outer membrane proteins of. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2008;88:526–544. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Spann D., Pross E., Chen Y., Dalbey R.E., Kuhn A. Each protomer of a dimeric YidC functions as a single membrane insertase. Sci Rep. 2018;8:589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18830-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Steinberg R., Knüpffer L., Origi A., Asti R., Koch H.G. Co-translational protein targeting in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018:365. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Steudle A., Spann D., Pross E., Shanmugam S.K., Dalbey R.E., Kuhn A. Molecular communication of the membrane insertase YidC with translocase SecYEG affects client proteins. Sci Rep. 2021;11:3940. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83224-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Swanson S., Ioerger T.R., Rigel N.W., Miller B.K., Braunstein M., Sacchettini J.C. Structural similarities and differences between two functionally distinct SecA proteins, Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA1 and SecA2. J Bacteriol. 2015;198:720–730. doi: 10.1128/JB.00696-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Teufel F., Almagro Armenteros J.J., Johansen A.R., Gíslason M.H., Pihl S.I., Tsirigos K.D., et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1023–1025. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Texier P., Bordes P., Nagpal J., Sala A.J., Mansour M., Cirinesi A.M., et al. ClpXP-mediated degradation of the TAC antitoxin is neutralized by the SecB-like chaperone in. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Mol Biol. 2021;433:166815. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Thakur P., Choudhary E., Pareek M., Agarwal N. Regulation and overexpression studies of YidC in. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17114. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35475-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Tschumi A., Grau T., Albrecht D., Rezwan M., Antelmann H., Sander P. Functional analyses of mycobacterial lipoprotein diacylglyceryl transferase and comparative secretome analysis of a mycobacterial lgt mutant. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:3938–3949. doi: 10.1128/JB.00127-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Tschumi A., Nai C., Auchli Y., Hunziker P., Gehrig P., Keller P., et al. Identification of apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase (Lnt) in mycobacteria. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:27146–27156. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.022715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Tsirigotaki A., De Geyter J., Šoštaric N., Economou A., Karamanou S. Protein export through the bacterial Sec pathway. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:21–36. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Tsukazaki T. Structure-based working model of SecDF, a proton-driven bacterial protein translocation factor. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018:365. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Tufariello J.M., Chapman J.R., Kerantzas C.A., Wong K.W., Vilchèze C., Jones C.M., et al. Separable roles for Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-3 effectors in iron acquisition and virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E348–E357. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523321113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Van den Berg B., Clemons W.M., Jr., Collinson I., Modis Y., Hartmann E., Harrison S.C., et al. X-ray structure of a protein-conducting channel. Nature. 2004;427:36–44. doi: 10.1038/nature02218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.van Winden V.J., Ummels R., Piersma S.R., Jiménez C.R., Korotkov K.V., Bitter W., et al. Mycosins are required for the stabilization of the ESX-1 and ESX-5 type VII secretion membrane complexes. mBio. 2016:7. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01471-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.van Winden V.J.C., Bunduc C.M., Ummels R., Bitter W., Houben E.N.G. A Chimeric EccB-MycP fusion protein is functional and a stable component of the ESX-5 type VII secretion system membrane complex. J Mol Biol. 2020;432:1265–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Venkatesan A., Palaniyandi K., Sharma D., Bisht D., Narayanan S. Characterization of FtsY, its interaction with Ffh, and proteomic identification of their potential substrates in. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Can J Microbiol. 2018;64:243–251. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2017-0385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Wagner J.M., Chan S., Evans T.J., Kahng S., Kim J., Arbing M.A., et al. Structures of EccB1 and EccD1 from the core complex of the mycobacterial ESX-1 type VII secretion system. BMC Struct Biol. 2016;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12900-016-0056-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Wagner J.M., Evans T.J., Chen J., Zhu H., Houben E.N., Bitter W., et al. Understanding specificity of the mycosin proteases in ESX/type VII secretion by structural and functional analysis. J Struct Biol. 2013;184:115–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Wagner J.M., Evans T.J., Korotkov K.V. Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of EccA₁ ATPase from the ESX-1 secretion system of. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proteins. 2014;82:159–163. doi: 10.1002/prot.24351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Wang Y., Tang Y., Lin C., Zhang J., Mai J., Jiang J., et al. Crosstalk between the ancestral type VII secretion system ESX-4 and other T7SS in Mycobacterium marinum. iScience. 2022;25:103585. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Weaver D.R., Amin D.N., King G.M. The conformations and basal conformational dynamics of translocation factor SecDF vary with translocon SecYEG interaction. J Biol Chem. 2022;298:102412. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Wu K., Minshull T.C., Radford S.E., Calabrese A.N., Bardwell J.C.A. Trigger factor both holds and folds its client proteins. Nat Commun. 2022;13:4126. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31767-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Xiao X., Fay A., Molina P.S., Kovach A., Glickman M.S., Li H. Structure of the M. tuberculosis DnaK-GrpE complex reveals how key DnaK roles are controlled. Nat Commun. 2024;15:660. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44933-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Xie X.Q., Zhang X.L., Qi C., Li D.F., Fleming J., Wang D.C., et al. Crystallographic observation of the movement of the membrane-distal domain of the T7SS core component EccB1 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2016;72:139–144. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X16000212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Yan S., Zhen J., Li Y., Zhang C., Stojkoska A., Lambert N., et al. Mce-associated protein Rv0177 alters the cell wall structure of Mycobacterium smegmatis and promotes macrophage apoptosis via regulating the cytokines. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;66:205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Yosef I., Bochkareva E.S., Bibi E. Escherichia coli SRP, its protein subunit Ffh, and the Ffh M domain are able to selectively limit membrane protein expression when overexpressed. mBio. 2010:1. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00020-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Zhang X.L., Li D.F., Fleming J., Wang L.W., Zhou Y., Wang D.C., et al. Core component EccB1 of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis type VII secretion system is a periplasmic ATPase. Faseb j. 2015;29:4804–4814. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-270843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Zhu Z., Wang S., Shan S.O. Ribosome profiling reveals multiple roles of SecA in cotranslational protein export. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3393. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31061-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table_S1
mmc1.xlsx (112.1KB, xlsx)
Table_S2
mmc2.xlsx (120.6KB, xlsx)
Table_S3
mmc3.xlsx (55.2KB, xlsx)
Table_S4
mmc4.xlsx (30.7KB, xlsx)
Table_S5
mmc5.xlsx (164.2KB, xlsx)
Table_S6
mmc6.xlsx (235.7KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometry data generated in this study have been deposited in PRIDE under accession PXD066777.

Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact (vinaykn@nii.ac.in or vinaykn.ccmb@csir.res.in) upon request.


Articles from Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES