Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Sep 5;104(6):539–555. doi: 10.1111/cen.70027

Cardiovascular Health in Women—Across the Lifespan

Jaya Chandrasekhar 1,2, Jessica Yao 3,4, Simone Gong 4, Madhuka Wijayarathne 1, Monique Watts 5, Swati Mukherjee 5,6,✉
PMCID: PMC13124682  PMID: 40908825

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among women worldwide. However, CVD continues to be perceived as a predominantly male issue. CVD in women therefore remains understudied, underrecognized and undertreated. Starting in adolescence and extending into older age, lifestyle factors, psychosocial stressors, hormonal changes and pregnancy, significantly influence the cardiovascular health of women. This review provides a comprehensive overview of CVD in women, focusing on sex‐specific risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment across the lifespan. The article seeks to raise awareness and provide insights into sex‐specific prevention, diagnosis and management strategies. We highlight gaps in knowledge to underscore the importance of sex‐based research that is crucial to improving outcomes for women with CVD.

Keywords: CVD, heart disease in women, pregnancy and heart disease, sex specific risk factors, Women's Heart Health

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among women worldwide [1]. Overall mortality and rehospitalization rates due to CVD are higher in women than men, especially among younger women [2]. CVD includes vascular dementia which accounts for 15%–20% of dementia cases, a leading cause of illness and morbidity in Australian women. However, CVD continues to be perceived as a predominantly male issue and therefore remains understudied, underrecognized and undertreated in women [3, 4] Women have poorer clinical outcomes and reported patient experience than men [5]. A better understanding of the unique risk factors, manifestations, underlying biological mechanisms that contribute to sex‐specific differences in outcomes will have a positive impact not just on clinical outcomes in women but also reduce the economic burden due to repeat hospitalisations and missed workdays.

Starting in adolescence and extending into older age, lifestyle factors, psychosocial stressors, hormonal changes and pregnancy, significantly influence the cardiovascular health of women. This review provides a comprehensive overview of CVD in women, focusing on sex‐specific risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment across the lifespan.

The article seeks to raise awareness and provide insights into sex‐specific prevention, diagnosis and management strategies. We also highlight gaps in knowledge to underscore the importance of sex‐based research that is crucial to improving outcomes for women with CVD. The review includes sections addressing adolescence, pregnancy, young women, perimenopause and older women.

2. Adolescence

Manifestations of CVD In childhood, occur largely from congenital heart defects, inherited cardiomyopathies, rheumatic heart disease (RHD), and infective endocarditis [6]. The incidence of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) also peaks in the years following menarche, with the former being an important risk factor for CVD, and the latter causing substantial disability in young women. In addition, poor cardiovascular risk factor control in childhood is associated with cardiovascular events in adulthood.

2.1. Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)

PCOS is defined by hyperandrogenism and ovarian dysfunction. These hormonal aberrancies have a detrimental effect on cardiometabolic health, as androgen excess causes central and visceral adiposity, thus facilitating atherogenic lipid profiles and insulin resistance. Compensatory hyperinsulinism further stimulates androgen secretion and subsequent adipose tissue dysfunction [7, 8].

Women with PCOS are threefold more likely to develop diabetes, and 50% more likely to develop CVD [9]. Risk reduction involves lifestyle modifications with a focus on maintaining a healthy BMI, anti‐androgenic pharmacotherapy, blood glucose management and ongoing surveillance for insulin resistance and traditional risk factors of CVD. In addition to diet and exercise, studies have also found that GLP‐1 agonists and bariatric surgery are effective weight loss options, and result in significant decreases in serum levels of testosterone, as well as improvement in PCOS symptoms such as hirsutism and menstrual dysfunction [10, 11].

First‐line medication for women with PCOS are combined oral contraceptives (COC). COCs containing a progestin that has either low androgen receptor affinity (third generation) or anti‐androgen action (fourth generation such drospirenone) are preferred in women with PCOS [12, 13]. Similarly, anti‐androgenic medications such as spironolactone, flutamide, and 5α‐reductase inhibitors which are prescribed for symptoms of androgen excess in PCOS such as hirsutism and acne also ameliorate systemic hyperandrogenism, thus having a beneficial effect on body fat distribution and cardiometabolic health [8, 14]. Oral hypoglycaemics, particularly metformin, are considered for insulin resistance.

2.2. Endometriosis

Endometriosis affects 10% of women worldwide, appearing following menarche, with peak incidence between 25 and 45 years of age [15]. Women with endometriosis are approximately 20% more likely to develop CVD, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure and arrhythmias, and this risk further increases in those who undergo hysterectomy and bilateral salphingo‐oophorectomy likely due to lack of oestrogen and inflammation caused by endometriosis [16]. Higher oxidative stress and elevated pro‐inflammatory cytokines may contribute to higher prevalence of CVD [17]. Increased psychological distress in women with endometriosis may also increase risks of a poor cardiometabolic profile.

2.3. Contraceptive Choice

Studies regarding the association between COC and arterial thromboembolism, particularly myocardial infarction (AMI), have yielded inconsistent results, with older studies indicating a positive association, whereas some newer studies have found that COC may even reduce CVD risk, especially with longer durations of use [18, 19]. All women, before COC commencement, should however be screened for traditional risk factors such as high blood pressure, as COC choice should be individualised and tailored accordingly. First‐generation contraceptives containing higher doses of oestrogen have been found to confer a nearly threefold risk for CVD [19]. Hence, women with higher risk cardiometabolic profiles should receive third or fourth generation COCs with 20 μg of ethinyl estradiol or less. Women with PCOS would also benefit from the androgen‐suppressing effects of newer COCs. In women with a very high risk of thromboembolic events, progestin‐only pills (POPs) may be considered. However, POPs provide less anti‐androgenic benefits, and there is limited evidence on how they affect cardiometabolic health in women with PCOS [12].

2.4. Management of CV Risk in Adolescents

In addition to PCOS and endometriosis being sex‐specific risk factors, traditional CV risk factors in adolescents should also be assessed and managed.

Recent WHO data highlights that 30% of children are overweight or obese, and up to 80% fail to meet daily physical activity guidelines [20]. Over 10% of teenagers report smoking, while a third report using e‐cigarettes, a habit with yet unclear cardiovascular implications [21].

In a prospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 35 years, it was found that adults who had poor cardiovascular risk profiles as children carried this risk into adulthood [22]. Promoting healthy lifestyle in children and adolescents is vital. In young, additional risk factors such as PCOS and endometriosis should be recognised.

3. Pregnancy and Cardiovascular System

Pregnancy triggers physiological adaptations to ensure adequate uteroplacental blood flow [23], including increase in cardiac output and systemic vasodilation, most marked in the first trimester [23, 24]. Hormonal, metabolic and immunological changes also occur [25].

Pregnancy complications including gestational diabetes (GDM), pre‐eclampsia (PE), preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, stillbirth and placental abruption increase future CVD risk [26]. PE increases heart failure (HF) risk fourfold and coronary artery disease (CAD) twofold [27]. GDM raises type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and CVD [28] risk. Assisted reproductive therapies may also increase CVD risk [29, 30, 31], due to physiological changes causing a prothrombotic state and endothelial dysfunction.

3.1. Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy

Around 4% of pregnancies worldwide are complicated by cardiac disease. CVD is the leading cause of pregnancy‐related deaths [32]. Figure 1 lists current guideline recommendations for management of CAD, arrhythmias, heart failure and adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) during pregnancy. Table 1 shows the risk‐stratified management of ACHD, and valvular presentations in pregnancy.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Current guideline recommendations for management of cardiovascular disease during pregnancy.

Table 1.

Cardiovascular disease in pregnancy.

Congenital heart disease
Lesion Risk Intervention/delivery
Low risk lesions (WHO I and II)
  • Pulmonary stenosis (small/mild)
  • Patent ductus arteriosus (small/mild)
  • Mitral valve prolapse (small/mild)
  • Successfully repaired simple shunt defects (ASD, VSD, PDA, APVR)
  • Unrepaired ASD or VSD
  • Repaired tetralogy of fallot
  • Turner syndrome without aortic dilatation
No detectable increased risk of maternal mortality and no/mild increased risk in morbidity Followed up quarterly
Delivery local hospital
Moderate risk lesions (WHO class III)
  • Systemic right ventricle (transposition of the great arteries)
  • Cyanotic lesions without pulmonary hypertension
  • Fontan‐type circulation.
  • Marfan syndrome without aortic dilation
  • Aortic dilation < 45 mm in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy
  • Repaired coarctation
Mild‐to‐moderate increased risk Followed up at least once every trimester in a tertiary centre with a multidisciplinary team
Delivery tertiary hopsital
High risk lesions WHO class IV
  • Pulmonary arterial hypertension (of any cause)
  • Eisenmenger syndrome.
High maternal morbidity and mortality risk Generally advised against pregnancy
Early termination should be considered in unplanned pregnancies.
Care in a tertiary centre with a multidisciplinary team with weekly follow up in the third trimester is recommended
Valvular heart disease
Left sided lesions
Mitral stenosis is the most common valvulopathy in pregnancy. Common causes include rheumatic and ACHD. Moderate‐severe MS, NYHA class III‐IV symptoms or a history of cardiac complications are at highest risk Vaginal delivery in mild MS; Caesarean in moderate–severe MS in FC III/IV or having pulmonary HT on medical therapy
Aortic stenosis most often caused by congenital bicuspid aortic valve Mild‐moderate AS is well tolerated. Severe AS and age > 30 years old are at highest risk Non‐severe AS vaginal delivery, in selected cases of severe AS Caesarean delivery can be considered.
Mitral regurgitation (MR) most often due to RHD and mitral valve prolapse. Moderate‐to‐severe MR with good LV function: low risk with good care Vaginal delivery is preferable. Epidural anaesthesia and shortened second stage is advisable
Severe MR with LV dysfunction: high risk of heart failure or arrhythmia
Aortic regurgitation (AR) most often due to congenital bicuspid aortic valve or aortopathies. Moderate‐to‐severe AR with good LV function: low risk with good care Vaginal delivery is preferable. Epidural anaesthesia and shortened second stage is advisable
Severe AR with LV dysfunction: high risk of heart failure or arrhythmia
Right sided lesions
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is uncommon and usually in the setting of Ebstein anomaly, RHD or endocarditis. Moderate‐to‐severe TR with good RV function: arrythmias Vaginal delivery is preferable.
Moderate‐to‐severe TR with impaired RV function: heart failure
Pulmonic stenosis (PS) is most commonly due to ACHD. Mild‐moderate PS is generally well tolerated. Severe PS has been associated with high rates of hypertensive disorders, preterm delivery and thromboembolic complications. Furthermore, RV failure and arrhythmias have been described in pregnancy Vaginal delivery is preferable unless very symptomatic in severe PS
Prosthetic valves
Prosthetic valves are commonly encountered in pregnancy. Anticoagulation requires careful consideration Women with bioprosthetic and mechanical valves should be on aspirin during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. In those with mechanical valves, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended in the 1st trimester. In the 2nd and 3rd trimesters, warfarin is recommended until 36 weeks' gestation. Women should then be transitioned to intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) until 24 h before delivery. UFH should be recommenced 6 h after vaginal delivery or 12 h after a Caesarean section.
Acute coronary syndrome
The most common cause of MI in the first trimester is atherosclerotic MI. In the second trimester, atherosclerotic MI and thrombosis are the most common causes. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is most common in the third trimester and postpartum period. Pregnancy associated‐SCAD (P‐SCAD) is the most common cause of MI in pregnancy overall (43%), occurring most frequently in the 1st week postpartum. Maternal risk factors for SCAD include older age, black race, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, depression, migraine, infertility treatment and multiparity Acute MI can cause hemodynamic instability with incident maternal and foetal risk Atherosclerotic MI should be managed with angiography and intervention in STEMI and high risk NSTEMI
Compared to SCAD in nonpregnant patients, P‐SCAD has been associated with worse prognosis and more severe clinical presentations including STEMI, larger infarcts, more proximal dissections, LV dysfunction, cardiogenic shock, left main and multivessel dissection Management of P‐SCAD is similar to non‐pregnancy SCAD with a preference for conservative management.

As well as increasing heart rate and cardiac output, pregnancy is associated with increased plasma catecholamines, adrenergic receptor sensitivity, atrial stretch and end‐diastolic volumes due to increased stroke volume [33]. This increases awareness of benign palpitations and increases arrhythmia risk in the setting of pre‐existing substrate. Arrhythmia risk is highest in the 3rd trimester [34] and is increased in those with prior history of arrhythmias and ACHD [35]. Premature atrial and ventricular complexes and non‐sustained arrhythmias occur in ~50% of pregnant women with palpitations [33, 36]. AF is more common in those with underlying heart disease [37]. Current guidelines suggest routine anticoagulation with low weight molecular heparin [38].

AMI in pregnancy is rare, occurring in 1 per 16,000 deliveries [39]. with STEMI in 75% of cases [40]. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is most common in the third trimester and postpartum [39]. Coronary angiography is the gold standard diagnostic tool [41].

HF is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality [42] with Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) being the most common cardiomyopathy (68%). PPCM presents with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 45% occurring near delivery or post‐partum, in the absence of other causes [43]. Risk factors include age, PE, multiparity, multifetal gestation, hypertension, diabetes and obesity [43]. Complications include cardiogenic shock, thromboembolism, arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death [43]. Management recommendations are generally extrapolated from other HF cohorts [38]. ACE‐inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists are contraindicated in pregnancy due to risk of foetal malformations [42]. Women should continue HF medications until LV recovery. Contraception counselling is essential due to relapse risk and increased mortality risk in those with persistent LV dysfunction with subsequent pregnancies [44]. Given increased risk of thromboembolism with LV dysfunction, oestrogen‐based contraceptives should be avoided [44]. Implanon and Mirena are preferred.

In women with valvular heart disease (VHD) significant haemodynamic changes occur throughout pregnancy and serial monitoring is warranted. Mitral stenosis (MS) secondary to RHD is the most common valvulopathy [45]. Common complications include HF, arrhythmias and thromboembolism. Vaginal delivery is preferred given less blood loss, faster recovery and reduced thrombotic and infection risk. Epidural is preferred over spinal anaesthesia given lower risk of hypotension. Maternal effort can cause a Valsalva effect which transiently reduces cardiac output. Thus, assisted second stage of labour is preferred in those with moderate‐severe obstructive left‐sided valvular lesions.

Prevalence of ACHD in women of child‐bearing age is rising [46]. Validated risk‐stratification scores aid assessment [46] and preconception evaluation is crucial [47]. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing can determine cardiopulmonary reserve and functional status. Generally, risk factors include poor functional status, cyanosis, LVEF < 40%, left heart obstruction and prior history of complications [48]. ACHD risk in the foetus is also increased (3%–12% vs. 0.8% in mothers without ACHD) and a foetal echocardiogram at 18–22 weeks gestation is warranted [46]. ACHD also increases risk of postpartum haemorrhage, pre‐term delivery and small‐for‐gestational age babies [46]. Delivery plan should be outlined by 28 weeks [46] preferring vaginal delivery with an assisted second stage and epidural over a spinal anaesthetic [46]. Caesarean section is considered in high‐risk patients only. Table 1 shows low, moderate and high‐risk lesions and management options [46, 47, 48, 49]. Implanon and Mirena are also first‐line contraception in this group [50].

Multidisciplinary collaboration across cardiology, obstetrics, maternal‐foetal medicine, anaesthetics and primary care is crucial. Preconception counselling should include risk assessment and optimisation. Pregnancy requires regular monitoring and tailored delivery planning. Medications must be reviewed for maternal and foetal safety throughout [51]. Post‐partum, management should emphasise contraception and CVD risk factor optimisation [52].

4. Young Women

4.1. Coronary Syndromes

While CVD mortality continues to decline across all age groups, the rate of decline in younger women has plateaued in recent years [53]. Table 2 highlights pertinent issues related to managing coronary syndromes in young women. Women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) often have symptoms such as weakness, nausea, palpitations, or back pain, leading to delays in seeking medical care, often 2–5 h later than men [1]. These delays, compounded by underutilisation of guideline‐directed therapies and invasive interventions, contribute to poorer outcomes.

Table 2.

Important issues in the management of coronary syndromes in young women.

Important issues Focus areas
Coronary syndromes
Atherosclerotic disease pathogenesis
  • Less plaque rupture, More plaque erosion
  • Need for intravascular imaging for improved understanding but low uptake due to cost/clinical workflow reasons and no routine Medicare rebate
Unique presentations: Non obstructive disease
ANOCA (Angina with no obstructive coronary disease)
  • Inaccurate or incomplete diagnosis with lower uptake of guideline directed therapy in INOCA/ANOCA
  • Need for interventional testing (CMD and vasospasm) and/or cardiac MRI for more complete diagnosis.
INOCA (Ischaemia with no obstructive coronary disease)
  • Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) can be detected as reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR) on positron emission tomography or cardiac MRI or invasive techniques
  • Reduced uptake due to costs, time required for testing and lack of Medicare rebate
MINOCA (Myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary disease)
  • Coronary spasm is defined by reversible vascular smooth muscle hypercontractility resulting in > 90% narrowing of the coronary artery confirmed on coronary provocative testing with intracoronary acetylcholine
  • Need for randomised trials

Myocarditis

The cause is commonly viral in young patients but could be related to other infections, immune‐chemotherapy or recreational drug use

  • Presentation may be with arrhythmias and shock
  • Early echo will guide progress and need for pulsed steroids + transfer to a specialist transplant centre for cardiac MRI and biopsy
High index of suspicion required in young patients with high cardiac enzyme risk, cardiogenic shock and ventricular arrhythmias with no obstructive coronary disease

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD)

Associated with physical, emotional stress or hormonal stressors (use of contraceptive pills or hormone replacement therapy). Other risk factors include fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), extracoronary vascular arteriopathies and heritable connective tissue disorders such as Marfan, Ehlers‐Danlos and Loeys‐Dietz syndromes. SCAD is known to be familial in some cases and a common SCAD risk allele has been identified at the PHACTR1 (phosphatase and actin regulator 1)/EDN1 (endothelin 1) locus

  • Gradually improving recognition
  • Use of imaging is low for fear of extending dissection
  • Prolonged observation required
  • Conservative management is first‐line
  • Registry inclusion
  • FMD screening
  • Need for dedicated rehab
  • Advise re genetic testing and utility currently restricted to multivessel or recurrent SCAD (cost vs. benefit)
  • Need for randomised trials

Young women with ACS have distinct comorbidity profiles compared to men. Conditions including diabetes and hypertension confer significantly higher risk of AMI in women than in men [54]. Autoimmune diseases, more common in women, further elevate CVD risk. Sex‐specific risk factors like PCOS, premature menopause, and pregnancy complications also accelerate atherosclerosis. Cancer treatments can contribute to CV risk [55]. Indigenous women in Australia are disproportionately affected, being up to twice as likely to experience CVD and to die from coronary heart disease or stroke [56].

Myocardial infarction with non‐obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is increasingly recognised in women presenting with AMI [57] (15% women vs. 8% men) [58] and can have several causes. Intravascular imaging and cardiac MRI (CMR) can be used to establish underlying aetiology in majority of MINOCA cases [59].

SCAD is a leading cause of ACS and MINOCA [60, 61, 62] in young women [63] of mean age 42–53 years [64]. Strong female preponderance and increased prevalence of SCAD in pregnancy suggests hormonal links to pathophysiology [61]. Diagnosis is typically by coronary angiography and management with conservative therapy being the preferred option. In < 10% of patients, SCAD can progress within the first 3–6 days [64], thus in‐hospital observation is recommended. Coronary intervention is reserved for high‐risk cases. Patients are cautioned to avoid extreme or elite competitive sports, heavy lifting or activities that require straining [61]. In a recent Australia‐New Zealand registry, recurrence was noted in 3.6% over 18 months of follow‐up [65].

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is another key cause of MINOCA. CMD can affect epicardial and/or microvascular endothelial circulation, which reduces myocardial perfusion [66]. CMD can be detected as reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR) on positron emission tomography (PET) or CMR or using invasive techniques. Treatment based on interventional testing can improve quality of life [67].

Coronary spasm accounts for ~20% of MINOCA and is more common in men than women [68], characterised by reversible vascular smooth muscle hypercontractility [69]. Coronary spasm typically occurs at rest, but can be precipitated by stress, cold weather and hyperventilation. Diagnosis can be confirmed on invasive angiography and provocative testing with intracoronary acetylcholine [59]. Treatment includes calcium‐channel blockers nitrates and Nicorandil, and avoidance of triggers [59]. Nicorandil is not currently licensed in the US [70].

4.2. Arrhythmias

Atrioventricular (AV) node re‐entrant tachycardia is the most common cause for paroxysmal SVT and is twice more common in women than men [71]. Women have a greater tendency for atrial tachycardia. Automaticity is more common in premenopausal than postmenopausal women. Women are more likely to be diagnosed later, often being mislabelled with stress or anxiety and are more likely to choose medications over definitive therapy such as ablation [71, 72].

Men have a higher prevalence of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), mitral, tricuspid, ventriculo‐septal and non‐outflow tract ventricular tachycardia (VT) than women. In terms of sex specific triggers, 59% of women in one survey reported right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) VT initiation during periods of hormonal flux (premenstrual, gestational, perimenopausal or with administration of contraceptive pills) [71]. Medications including beta‐blockers or calcium‐channel blockers [73] and/or catheter ablation are recommended. After puberty, females with Long QT syndrome (LQT) 1 have a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias [71]than men. Women with LQT2 have higher risk of arrhythmias pre and post puberty. This risk increases in the postpartum period. Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator should be considered in women with LQT2 and a QTc> 500 ms. There is no clear sex difference in arrhythmia risk with LQT3. Although arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) affects an equal number of men and women genetically, more men than women manifest the phenotype and present with VT and sudden death [71, 74].

4.3. Dysautonomia

POTS is one form of dysautonomia with orthostatic intolerance primarily affecting young women [75]. In a large observational data set of 8919 patients with POTS, ~94% were female [76]. Diagnostic delay was longer in women (1.5 y vs. 0.92 y in men, p < 0.001) and both sexes saw a median number of 5 doctors before diagnosis. Symptoms include light‐headedness, palpitations and chest pain. More women experience gastrointestinal, allergic and neurological symptoms. More women report a preceding trigger such as a viral infection. More men report a family history of POTS. Diagnosis is clinical, although tilt‐table testing can be used as an adjunct to detect heart rate elevation of ≥ 30 bpm without fall in blood pressure on standing, with symptoms of orthostatic intolerance [77]. Treatment includes salt and electrolyte replacement, use of compressive wear, and medications such as beta blockers, ivabradine, selective‐serotonin‐reuptake inhibitors, fludrocortisone and midodrine.

4.4. Valvular Heart Disease

Rheumatic MS is the most common valvulopathy in young women [78]. AIHW data indicate that in 2019, 39% of RHD individuals were < 25 years of age and 66% were women [79]. Treatment of rheumatic MS includes diuretics, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation and balloon valvulotomy or mitral valve replacement in severe cases.

5. Cardiovascular Health During Peri‐Menopause

Menopause marks a period of steeply increasing cardiovascular risk. Women tend to develop CVD 7–10 years later than men, but women have a similar lifetime prevalence and mortality burden from heart disease to men [80, 81, 82, 83]. Early‐onset menopause (< 45 years), particularly from a surgical cause at a young age, confers greater risk of CVD, including both coronary and heart failure [84]. As such menopause is an opportune time to evaluate and manage cardiovascular risk, to improve long‐term prognosis [85, 86].

5.1. Pathophysiology

The exact pathophysiological links between reproductive hormone levels and CVD are still not fully understood, however, it can be clearly seen from longitudinal studies that post‐menopausal women have a vastly different cardiometabolic profile to premenopausal women [86, 87]. Figure 2 highlights the pathophysiology contributing to CVD in peri‐menopause. Reduced oestradiol (E2) and increased follicle stimulating hormone (FSH in the perimenopausal period, are associated with a number of adverse cardiometabolic processes that are linked to atherosclerosis, including dyslipidaemia, inflammation, increased visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, vascular reactivity and endothelial dysfunction [86, 88, 89].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pathophysiology contributing to cardiovascular disease in peri‐menopause.

During the peri‐menopausal period, many women experience weight gain secondary to a slowing basal metabolic rate (BMR), physical inactivity, sarcopenia, sleep disturbance and depression. Studies have found a disproportionate increase in central adiposity and visceral fat deposition during the peri‐menopausal period [90]. This increased paracentral adiposity subsequently contributes to the development of diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through insulin resistance creating a systemic pro‐inflammatory state and adverse vascular remodelling [88, 91].

Oestrogen is a potent vasodilator and modulates vascular reactivity. The low oestrogen state following menopause leads to decreased nitric oxide (NO) synthase, increased endothelin‐1, increased sympathetic activity and increased renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system (RAAS) activity [88, 89]. As a result, oxidative stress, detrimental vascular wall remodelling, endothelial dysfunction, and hypertension occur [92, 93]., The SWAN (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation) heart study found that women had increased arterial stiffness within 1 year of their final menstrual period [94].

Like hypertension, the rates of dyslipidaemia increase sharply in post‐menopausal women. Adult premenopausal women have lower total cholesterol (TC) and LDL‐C levels, and higher HDL‐C levels, than matched men [95, 96] however post‐menopausal women see a reversal in their lipid profiles, having on average higher levels of LDL‐C, TC and apolipoprotein B, as well as lower HDL‐C than matched men [96]. Investigators in the Framingham Study noted that the peri‐menopausal period marked a transition in LDL particles in women to smaller and more dense particles, conferring a higher atherosclerotic risk [97].

Finally, through the hypothalamic‐pituitary axis, reproductive hormones are also thought to be immunomodulatory [88, 89, 98]. Periods of hormonal flux, namely puberty, pregnancy and menopause, are associated with spikes and troughs in the incidence or exacerbations of various autoimmune diseases. On a cellular level, an increase in pro‐inflammatory serum markers (IL1, IL6, TNF‐alpha) is seen during menopause. Autoimmune conditions are independent risk factors for CVD, with patients who have one autoimmune disease 1.5 times more likely to develop CVD than the average population [85, 99]. This ratio increases in those with multiple autoimmune disorders and is higher for specific disorders like SLE which has nearly 3 times more risk of CVD [99].

5.2. Presentation and Management

Clinical presentation and outcomes of CVD differ between men and women and across the lifespan [100], particularly in the early post‐menopausal group, women who have CAD are predisposed towards smaller overall plaque burden, fewer focal calcified lesions and less obstructive disease when compared to men [85, 101, 102]. When women do have calcified vessels however, these lesions tend to be longer segments and indicate higher CVD mortality than matched men [101].

A discussion of CVD prevention in middle‐aged women should begin with risk assessment, education and classical risk factor modification in peri and post‐menopause. The Australian guidelines recommend risk assessment begin at 45 years of age [103]. While recent movement towards developing sex‐specific risk calculators, such as with SCORE2 [104] is encouraging, this algorithm does not include female‐specific risk factors. Risk assessment for women should include nontraditional risk factors discussed in previous sections.

There are currently no sex‐specific recommendations for CVD management. All women should receive nonpharmacological management addressing smoking, alcohol consumption, diet and exercise, and be placed on appropriate guideline‐directed medical treatment to reach lipid, blood pressure and glucose targets. Promoting regular physical exercise has the additional benefit of improving vasomotor symptoms during menopause [105].

5.3. Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT)

MHT is well‐established as the most effective strategy for managing menopausal symptoms such as hot flushes, sleep disturbances, and general fatigue, providing a significant benefit to patient quality of life [106]. This improvement to quality of life enhances cardiac health by improving sleep, mental health, and physical activity rates. On a physiological level, oestradiol administration improves lipid and vascular markers. The 5‐year ELITE Trial showed reduced carotid intima‐media thickness progression when MHT was initiated in women < 6 years following menopause [107]. No benefits have been seen in women who begin MHT over 10 years following menopause, and in fact may cause higher risks of AMI, venous thromboembolism and stroke [108].

MHT is not currently indicated for primary or secondary CVD prevention, however both observational data and randomised trials suggest that when initiated in younger women, under 60 years of age or within 10 years of menopause, the risk of CAD and all cause mortality may be reduced [107]. Data from the Women's Health Initiative however shows harm from MHT in older women regarding CVD, stroke and venous thromboembolism [109], giving rise to the “timing hypothesis” whereby the timing of initiation of MHT determines the impact on cardiovascular health and specifically that MHT [107]. This may be especially important for women with severe vasomotor symptoms, who have been shown to have a particularly unfavourable cardiometabolic profile compared to their peers due to sympathetic overactivity and the effect of disabling vasomotor symptoms on lifestyle [110, 111].

There is a lack of head‐to‐head trials comparing MHT regimens and routes of administration however transdermal preparations impact coagulation and inflammatory biomarkers to a lesser degree with data suggesting lower risk of stroke and venous thromboembolism with transdermal therapy [112]. Progestogens are necessary in women with intact uterus, who receive oestrogen, to mitigate risk of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Early trials suggested increased risk of CVD in women receiving combined oestrogen and progestogen, but not in those receiving oestrogen alone, driving a hypothesis that progestogen may impact CV risk. The 2010 E3N study showed that the use of micronized progesterone with oestrogen was not associated with increased venous thromboembolism risk, whereas use of norpregnane progestins was [113]. Similarly, the Oestrogen and Thromboembolism Risk study showed that the risk of developing idiopathic venous thromboembolism was not associated with micronised compared with norpregnane derived synthetic progestins [114].

In conclusion, increasing cardiovascular risk must be recognised alongside other physiological changes that occur during menopause. Management should always include careful risk assessment, aggressive primary prevention through risk factor modification, and consideration of hormone therapy for those with disabling symptoms, with attention to timing of initiation.

6. Elderly Women

Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death in older women.

Table 3 shows the issues related to coronary and VHD in older women.

Table 3.

Important issues in management of coronary syndromes and valvular disease in older women.

Important issues Focus areas
Coronary syndromes
Symptoms
  • Symptoms considered atypical compared to men, including weakness, dyspnoea, malaise, nausea, palpitations or back pain are noted in women
  • Risk of delays due to social dependence
  • Social isolation and loneliness increase risk
Atherosclerotic disease pathogenesis More calcific nodules can make intervention challenging Use of intravascular imaging to assist invasive management
ACS Presentations:
  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • MINOCA (Myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary disease)
  • Takotsubo's cardiomyopathy
Reduced uptake of guideline directed therapy and invasive management due to frailty bias Improved referral for invasive testing and treatment with coronary stenting or bypass surgery as needed, guideline directed medical therapy and rehabilitation
Valvular heart disease
Aortic stenosis (AS)
  • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a definitive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with reduced morbidity.
  • Bleeding risk remains higher than men, although improved technologies have reduced vascular risks
  • Septal bulge and left ventricular outflow tract gradient can preclude TAVI with need for alcohol septal ablation/surgical myectomy + SAVR.
  • Bicuspid AS is discussed on a case‐by‐case basis for TAVI versus SAVR.
  • Emphasis is on lifetime planning in patients that may require repeat aortic valve interventions subsequently
Mitral regurgitation: secondary to prolapse (primary) and functional (secondary) MR Late diagnosis due to absence of sex specific criteria on echo is common
  • Mitral valve repair is the gold standard for primary MR.
  • Mitraclip and transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) can be considered in high risk surgical cases, to improve MR intensity, heart failure and improve New York Heart Association dyspnoea class and quality of life.
  • Requires referral to select specialist centres.
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) Severe TR can be associated with left heart disease and is often functional. May also be associated with permanent pacemaker lead in the right ventricle
  • Surgery for isolated severe TR is uncommon due to morbidity related to recovery.
  • TEER is a novel option in high surgical risk patients that may offer reduced frequency of right heart failure and improved quality of life.
  • Requires referral to select specialist centres.
  • Randomised data for mortality outcomes are lacking.

6.1. Coronary Syndromes

Atherosclerotic CVD rises in women with age, especially after 70 years [115]. Women present with ACS later than men, often with higher overall comorbidities [58, 116] and more non‐obstructive CAD [58, 117, 118]. Management is challenging due to under‐recognition, underdiagnosis and under‐representation in clinical trials [117, 119]. Elderly women are less likely to report typical chest pain/any chest pain with a longer symptom to balloon time than males [120]. Language barrier, frailty and cognitive decline [121, 122] further complicate care. A US study of more than 57,000 older women, found that social isolation and loneliness increased CVD risk by 13% and 27% higher risk of incident CVD respectively compared to counterparts with less social isolation and loneliness.

Aging women show faster increase in coronary calcification, calcified plaque progression and calcific nodules [118, 123]. Women are more vulnerable to endothelial dysfunction and microvascular remodelling [118]. Following ACS, females across the lifespan receive fewer interventions including PCI and mechanical circulatory support. Females > 85 years are significantly less likely to undergo CABG [124]. They are also less likely to be prescribed guideline‐directed therapy for ACS including ACEi, beta blockers, aspirin and statins [124, 125].

Women typically have higher risk of in‐hospital and short term mortality, and readmission at 30 days and 2 years post‐ACS, however, adverse events in older women are comparable to men [116]. A meta‐analysis looking at sex differences proposes that observed differences in mortality vary depending on clinical presentation and angiographic disease [58].

6.2. Systemic Hypertension, Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension

Ageing women have a greater increase in arterial stiffness compared to males, and more rapid blood pressure elevation [118], with hypertension being more prevalent among women than men after the age of 65 years [118]. The latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines for hypertension categorise recommendations for managing hypertension in older and frail patients [126].

HF phenotypes differ according to gender; women have a higher prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [117, 127, 128]. While ischaemia is a significant cause in males, hypertension and diabetes are key contributors in women [117, 127]. Women with heart failure tend to be older [117], have greater comorbidities [128], and report worse symptoms and quality of life [127, 128].

Despite this, women with heart failure have lower rate of cardiovascular death in women, likely due to significantly lower risk of sudden cardiac death and higher non‐cardiovascular mortality [127]. The TOPCAT trial (The Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial) [128], and I‐PRESERVE trial (Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial [129] found women to have lower rates of cardiovascular mortality, HF hospitalisations and all‐cause mortality compared to men.

Guidelines do not differentiate guideline‐directed medical therapy by gender [130] but optimal doses in older adults and whether doses should be adjusted by sex remain unclear. BIOSTAT‐CHF a prospective European study of patients with HFrEF showed that men achieved the lowest risk of adverse CV outcomes at 100% of guideline‐directed doses, whereas women reached 30% risk reduction at 50% of the guideline‐directed doses with no additional benefit at higher doses [131]. Current evidence does not support withholding medications or use of optimal doses in frailty. It remains important to tailor treatment to and be aware that optimal doses may be lower than those tolerated by younger populations studied in trials [130].

Pulmonary artery hypertension (PHT) is an under‐diagnosed cause for dyspnoea in women. Group 1 PHT is more prevalent in women [132]. While PHT can be related to left heart disease or lung disease, formal testing with right heart catheterisation and referral to specialist centres is required to identify suitability for vasodilator medications [133].

6.3. Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

AF incidence increases with age in both sexes reaching 30.4 per 1000 patient years in women by 85–89 years of age [134]. Women have higher prevalence of hypertension and valvular disease, with higher left atrial dimensions. Female sex is an independent risk factor for stroke in AF [134] yet women are undertreated with anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis. In a Canadian AF registry it was found that in patients > 75years of age, women with > 1 stroke risk factor were less likely to be on warfarin than males [135]. However women on warfarin were also three times more likely to experience a major bleed compared to males [135]. Similarly, women were less likely to receive a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) even when eligible with low bleeding risk (CHA2DS2VASc score of ≥ 2 and HAS‐BLED score of ≤ 3) [136]. Women also had a higher ischaemic stroke risk and lower intracranial haemorrhage compared to men, in this study which was partially due to anticoagulation disparities [136].

6.4. Valvular Heart Disease

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is more common in women [78] and is more likely to be anterior or bileaflet prolapse [137]. Women with severe MR often do not reach echocardiographic parameters for surgical interventions as recommendations in guidelines are based on male populations and are not indexed for body surface area [137]. Consequently, women have later surgical referrals, undergo mitral valve surgery less frequently and have higher long‐term mortality [78, 137]. While transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) improves clinical outcomes irrespective of sex compared to guideline‐directed medical therapy alone, the reduction of HF hospitalisations was lower in women beyond the first year after treatment [78].

Randomised trial data in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis have shown equal prevalence in high‐risk older women and men, with women demonstrating excellent outcomes with reduced morbidity after transcatheter aortic valve intervention compared to surgical aortic valve replacement [138].

7. Summary and Key Recommendations

There is growing recognition that CVD prevention, treatment, and management require a sex‐specific approach. Table 4 lists some future recommendations for the management of CVD in women. Figure 3 represents the central graphic for CV issues over the lifespan of a woman.

Table 4.

Future recommendations for the management of cardiovascular disease in women.

Stage of life Recommendations for clinical management Recommendations for research in all women
Adolescence Start CV risk stratification early to address lifetime risk.
  • Design studies with adequate female representation and powered analyses.
  • Explore under‐researched areas (e.g., non‐obstructive disease, SCAD, and device studies).
  • Provide detailed informed consent processes and support, including interpreters and multilingual materials for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients.
  • Aim for equal representation of women, including older women, and systematically screen to ensure inclusion.
  • Offer alternatives to face‐to‐face follow‐up, such as electronic, text, or phone consultations.
  • Ensure diversity among research staff, including more women.
Young women
  • Involve specialists for non‐obstructive disease and SCAD.
  • Refer for complete interventional diagnostic testing in in non‐obstructive disease patients with recurrent symptoms.
Pregnancy
  • Reduce metabolic risks before pregnancy planning.
  • Monitor CV risks during pregnancy (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, intrauterine growth restriction [IUGR], preterm labour).
  • Provide longitudinal follow‐up postpartum to monitor for early CV disease development.
  • Link postpartum women with metabolic complications of pregnancy to cardiology clinics for continued care.
Perimenopause
  • Perform careful risk assessment and aggressive primary prevention through risk factor modification.
  • Consider hormone therapy for disabling vasomotor symptoms.
Older age Treat heart disease in older women with guideline‐directed therapies (medications and invasive management).
All stages Ensure healthcare teams are diverse to make women feel more comfortable discussing symptoms, treatment options, and follow‐up.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Central illustration—Cardiovascular issues over the lifespan of a woman.

CVD risk factors often emerge in adolescence, underscoring the importance of early identification and prevention of atherosclerosis, by encouraging healthy lifestyles in teenagers, and their families [139]. Interventions should focus on the overall risk trajectory, with particular emphasis on vulnerable populations such as indigenous women. Women are less likely than men to discuss heart health with their general practitioner or undergo heart health checks, highlighting the need for targeted policy and education campaigns to raise awareness among both women and their clinicians.

Female‐specific risk factors and impact on metabolism should be addressed before pregnancy planning [140]. Linking postpartum women with cardiology clinics for long‐term follow‐up is critical, as is ensuring that women with modifiable risk factors receive optimal care. Perimenopausal management with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), particularly for vasomotor symptoms, should not be discouraged.

National health metrics should prioritise early presentation and reduced symptom‐to‐treatment times, with hospitals held accountable for these targets. The term atypical chest pain should be phased out and women should be considered for all presenting symptoms in the context of their risk factors [141]. Regular audits of guideline‐directed medical therapy uptake in women across all age groups are essential.

Clinical research must increase the inclusion of women, accounting for caregiving roles and other barriers. Major funding bodies now mandate the inclusion of women and minorities in trials, with analyses of sex and racial differences. Journals should further support this policy by requiring authors to address sex and sex differences in their publications.

The growing recognition of persistent sex‐based disparities in CVD is driving vital advancements in research, clinical practice, public awareness, and health policy.

Acknowledgements

Open access publishing facilitated by Monash University, as part of the Wiley ‐ Monash University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

References

  • 1. Mehta L. S., Beckie T. M., DeVon H. A., et al., “Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women,” Circulation 133, no. 9 (2016): 916–947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Izadnegahdar M., Mackay M., Lee M. K., et al., “Sex and Ethnic Differences in Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Angina Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease,” supplement, Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 9, no. 2 S1 (2016): S26–S35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ghare M. I., Chandrasekhar J., Mehran R., Ng V., Grines C., and Lansky A., “Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Device Evaluations,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 12, no. 3 (2019): 301–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Matthews S., Cook S., Clayton T., Murray S., Wynne R., and Sanders J., “Factors Affecting Women's Participation in Cardiovascular Research: A Scoping Review,” European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 23, no. 2 (2024): 107–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Okunrintemi V., Valero‐Elizondo J., Patrick B., et al., “Gender Differences in Patient‐Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease,” Journal of the American Heart Association 7, no. 24 (2018): e010498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Shaddy R. E., George A. T., Jaecklin T., et al., “Systematic Literature Review on the Incidence and Prevalence of Heart Failure in Children and Adolescents,” Pediatric Cardiology 39, no. 3 (2018): 415–436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Escobar‐Morreale H. F. and Millán J. L. S., “Abdominal Adiposity and the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome,” Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 18, no. 7 (2007): 266–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Escobar‐Morreale H. F., “Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Definition, Aetiology, Diagnosis and Treatment,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology 14, no. 5 (2018): 270–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wan Z., Zhao J., Ye Y., et al., “Risk and Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease Associated With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome,” European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 31, no. 13 (2024): 1560–1570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Escobar‐Morreale H. F., Santacruz E., Luque‐Ramírez M., and Botella Carretero J. I., “Prevalence of ‘Obesity‐Associated Gonadal Dysfunction’ in Severely Obese Men and Women and Its Resolution After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Human Reproduction Update 23, no. 4 (2017): 390–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cena H., Chiovato L., and Nappi R. E., “Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Infertility: A New Avenue for GLP‐1 Receptor Agonists,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 105, no. 8 (2020): 2695–2709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Akre S., Sharma K., Chakole S., and Wanjari M. B., “Recent Advances in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Review Article,” Cureus 14, no. 8 (2022): e27689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Teede H. J., Misso M. L., Costello M. F., et al., “Recommendations From the International Evidence‐Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome†,” Human Reproduction 33, no. 9 (2018): 1602–1618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gambineri A., Patton L., Vaccina A., et al., “Treatment With Flutamide, Metformin, and Their Combination Added to a Hypocaloric Diet in Overweight‐Obese Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized, 12‐Month, Placebo‐Controlled Study,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 91, no. 10 (2006): 3970–3980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Marchandot B., Curtiaud A., Matsushita K., et al., “Endometriosis and Cardiovascular Disease,” European Heart Journal Open 2, no. 1 (2022): oeac001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Havers‐Borgersen E., Hartwell D., Ekelund C., et al., “Endometriosis and Long‐Term Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Danish Study,” European Heart Journal 45 (2024): 4734–4743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Taylor H. S., Kotlyar A. M., and Flores V. A., “Endometriosis Is a Chronic Systemic Disease: Clinical Challenges and Novel Innovations,” The Lancet 397, no. 10276 (2021): 839–852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dou W., Huang Y., Liu X., et al., “Associations of Oral Contraceptive Use With Cardiovascular Disease and All‐Cause Death: Evidence From the UK Biobank Cohort Study,” Journal of the American Heart Association 12, no. 16 (2023): e030105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tanis B. C., van den Bosch M. A. A. J., Kemmeren J. M., et al., “Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction,” New England Journal of Medicine 345, no. 25 (2001): 1787–1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hallal P. C., Andersen L. B., Bull F. C., Guthold R., Haskell W., and Ekelund U., “Global Physical Activity Levels: Surveillance Progress, Pitfalls, and Prospects,” Lancet 380, no. 9838 (2012): 247–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Organization W. H. WHO Global Report on Trends in Prevalence of Tobacco Use 2000–2025. 2021;4th ed. Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Jacobs D. R., Woo J. G., Sinaiko A. R., et al., “Childhood Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Adult Cardiovascular Events,” New England Journal of Medicine 386, no. 20 (2022): 1877–1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Sanghavi M. and Rutherford J. D., “Cardiovascular Physiology of Pregnancy,” Circulation 130, no. 12 (2014): 1003–1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tamirisa K. P., Elkayam U., Briller J. E., et al., “Arrhythmias in Pregnancy,” JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology 8, no. 1 (2022): 120–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Blaauw J., Smit A. J., van Pampus M. G., et al., “Skin Autofluorescence, a Marker of Advanced Glycation End Products and Oxidative Stress, Is Increased In Recently Preeclamptic Women,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 195, no. 3 (2006): 717–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Marschner S., Mukherjee S., Watts M., et al., “Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women With Pregnancy‐Related Risk Factors: A Prospective Women's Heart Clinic Study,” Journal of the American Heart Association 12, no. 17 (2023): e030015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wu P., Haththotuwa R., Kwok C. S., et al., “Preeclampsia and Future Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 10, no. 2 (2017): e003497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mosca L., Benjamin E. J., Berra K., et al., “Effectiveness‐Based Guidelines for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women‐‐2011 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association,” Circulation 123, no. 11 (2011): 1243–1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Elder P., Sharma G., Gulati M., and Michos E. D., “Identification of Female‐Specific Risk Enhancers Throughout the Lifespan of Women to Improve Cardiovascular Disease Prevention,” American Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2 (2020): 100028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Niazi E. and Dumanski S. M., “Change of HeART: Cardiovascular Implications of Assisted Reproductive Technology,” CJC Open 6, no. 2Part B (2024): 142–152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Magnus M. C., Fraser A., Håberg S. E., et al., “Maternal Risk of Cardiovascular Disease After Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies,” JAMA cardiology 8, no. 9 (2023): 837–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Merlo A. C., Rosa G. M., and Porto I., “Pregnancy‐Related Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review of the Recent Literature,” Clinical Research in Cardiology 111, no. 7 (2022): 723–731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Adamson D. L. and Nelson‐Piercy C., “Managing Palpitations and Arrhythmias During Pregnancy,” Heart (British Cardiac Society) 93, no. 12 (2007): 1630–1636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Li J. M., Nguyen C., Joglar J. A., Hamdan M. H., and Page R. L., “Frequency and Outcome of Arrhythmias Complicating Admission During Pregnancy: Experience From a High‐Volume and Ethnically‐Diverse Obstetric Service,” Clinical Cardiology 31, no. 11 (2008): 538–541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Ramlakhan K. P., Kauling R. M., Schenkelaars N., et al., “Supraventricular Arrhythmia in Pregnancy,” Heart 108, no. 21 (2022): 1674–1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Blomström‐Lundqvist C., Scheinman M. M., Aliot E. M., et al., “Acc/Aha/Esc Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias‐‐Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias) Developed In Collaboration With Naspe‐Heart Rhythm Society,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 42, no. 8 (2003): 1493–1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chokesuwattanaskul R., Thongprayoon C., Bathini T., et al., “Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Pregnancy and Clinical Significance: A Meta‐Analysis,” Advances in medical sciences 64, no. 2 (2019): 415–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Regitz‐Zagrosek V., Roos‐Hesselink J. W., Bauersachs J., et al., “2018 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases During Pregnancy,” European Heart Journal 39, no. 34 (2018): 3165–3241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Edupuganti M. M. and Ganga V., “Acute Myocardial Infarction in Pregnancy: Current Diagnosis and Management Approaches,” Indian Heart Journal 71, no. 5 (2019): 367–374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Elkayam U., Jalnapurkar S., Barakkat M. N., et al., “Pregnancy‐Associated Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review of Contemporary Experience In 150 Cases Between 2006 and 2011,” Circulation 129, no. 16 (2014): 1695–1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Havakuk O., Goland S., Mehra A., and Elkayam U., “Pregnancy and the Risk of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: An Analysis of 120 Contemporary Cases,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 10, no. 3 (2017): e004941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. DeFilippis E. M., Haythe J. H., Walsh M. N., and Kittleson M. M., “Intersection of Heart Failure and Pregnancy: Beyond Peripartum Cardiomyopathy,” Circulation. Heart failure 14, no. 5 (2021): e008223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Honigberg M. C. and Givertz M. M., “Peripartum Cardiomyopathy,” BMJ 364 (2019): k5287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Davis M. B., Arany Z., McNamara D. M., Goland S., and Elkayam U., “Peripartum Cardiomyopathy,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 75, no. 2 (2020): 207–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Lewey J., Andrade L., and Levine L. D., “Valvular Heart Disease in Pregnancy,” Cardiology Clinics 39, no. 1 (2021): 151–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. van Hagen I. M. and Roos‐Hesselink J. W., “Pregnancy in Congenital Heart Disease: Risk Prediction and Counselling,” Heart 106, no. 23 (2020): 1853–1861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Lindley K. J., Bairey Merz C. N., Asgar A. W., et al., “Management of Women With Congenital or Inherited Cardiovascular Disease From Pre‐Conception Through Pregnancy and Postpartum,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 77, no. 14 (2021): 1778–1798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Uebing A., Steer P. J., Yentis S. M., and Gatzoulis M. A., “Pregnancy and Congenital Heart Disease,” BMJ 332, no. 7538 (2006): 401–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Canobbio M. M., Warnes C. A., Aboulhosn J., et al., “Management of Pregnancy in Patients With Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association,” Circulation 135, no. 8 (2017): e50–e87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Baro‐Marine F., Pijuan‐Domenech A., Goya M. D. M., et al., “Progestogen Only Contraception in Women With Congenital Heart Disease,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 44, no. 1 (2024): 2320296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Halpern D. G., Weinberg C. R., Pinnelas R., Mehta‐Lee S., Economy K. E., and Valente A. M., “Use of Medication for Cardiovascular Disease During Pregnancy,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 73, no. 4 (2019): 457–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Davis M. B., Arendt K., Bello N. A., et al., “Team‐Based Care of Women With Cardiovascular Disease From Pre‐Conception Through Pregnancy and Postpartum,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 77, no. 14 (2021): 1763–1777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Welfare A. I. H.. Trends in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality: Age Groups and Populations. 2014.
  • 54. Yusuf S., Hawken S., Ôunpuu S., et al., “Effect of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors Associated With Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries (The INTERHEART Study): Case‐Control Study,” Lancet 364, no. 9438 (2004): 937–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Aleman B. M. P., Moser E. C., Nuver J., et al., “Cardiovascular Disease After Cancer Therapy,” European Journal of Cancer Supplements 12, no. 1 (2014): 18–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Welfare A. Io. Ha. Cardiovascular Disease in Indigenous Women. 2019.
  • 57. Kunadian V., Chieffo A., Camici P. G., et al., “An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia With Non‐Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration With European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group,” European Heart Journal 41, no. 37 (2020): 3504–3520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Berger J. S., “Sex Differences in Mortality Following Acute Coronary Syndromes,” Journal of the American Medical Association 302, no. 8 (2009): 874–882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Safdar B., Spatz E. S., Dreyer R. P., et al., “Presentation, Clinical Profile, and Prognosis of Young Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): Results From the VIRGO Study,” Journal of the American Heart Association 7, no. 13 (2018): e009174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hayes S. N., Kim E. S. H., Saw J., et al., “Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Current State of the Science: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association,” Circulation 137, no. 19 (2018): e523–e557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Hayes S. N., Tweet M. S., Adlam D., et al., “Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 76, no. 8 (2020): 961–984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Adlam D., Alfonso F., Maas A., et al., “European Society of Cardiology, Acute Cardiovascular Care Association, SCAD Study Group: A Position Paper on Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection,” European Heart Journal 39, no. 36 (2018): 3353–3368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Minissian M. B., Mehta P. K., Hayes S. N., et al., “Ischemic Heart Disease in Young Women,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 80, no. 10 (2022): 1014–1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Tweet M. S., Kok S. N., and Hayes S. N., “Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women: What Is Known and What Is Yet to Be Understood,” Clinical Cardiology 41, no. 2 (2018): 203–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Dang Q., Psaltis P., Burgess S., et al., “Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Recurrence From the Australia‐New Zealand Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (ANZ‐SCAD) Registry,” supplement, European Heart Journal 45, no. S1 (2024): ehae666.1718. [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Pacheco Claudio C., Quesada O., Pepine C. J., and Noel Bairey Merz C., “Why Names Matter for Women: MINOCA/INOCA (Myocardial Infarction/Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease),” Clinical Cardiology 41, no. 2 (2018): 185–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ford T. J., Stanley B., Good R., et al., “Stratified Medical Therapy Using Invasive Coronary Function Testing in Angina,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 72, no. 23 Pt A (2018): 2841–2855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Hung M. J., Hu P., and Hung M. Y., “Coronary Artery Spasm: Review and Update,” International Journal of Medical Sciences 11, no. 11 (2014): 1161–1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Matta A., Bouisset F., Lhermusier T., et al., “Coronary Artery Spasm: New Insights,” Journal of Interventional Cardiology 2020 (2020): 5894586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Tarkin J. M. and Kaski J. C., “Nicorandil and Long‐Acting Nitrates: Vasodilator Therapies for the Management of Chronic Stable Angina Pectoris,” European Cardiology Review 13, no. 1 (2018): 23–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Zeitler E. P., Poole J. E., Albert C. M., et al., “Arrhythmias in Female Patients: Incidence, Presentation and Management,” Circulation Research 130, no. 4 (2022): 474–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Lessmeier T. J., “Unrecognized Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia. Potential for Misdiagnosis as Panic Disorder,” Archives of Internal Medicine 157, no. 5 (1997): 537–543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Lu Y. Y., Chen Y. C., Lin Y. K., Chen S. A., and Chen Y. J., “Electrical and Structural Insights into Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Arrhythmogenesis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 14 (2023): 11795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Hauer R. N. W., “Men and Women in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy∗,” JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology 2, no. 5 (2016): 556–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. McDonald C., Koshi S., Busner L., Kavi L., and Newton J. L., “Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Is Associated With Significant Symptoms and Functional Impairment Predominantly Affecting Young Women: A UK Perspective,” BMJ Open 4, no. 6 (2014): e004127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Bourne K. M., Hall J., Stiles L. E., et al., “Symptom Presentation and Access to Medical Care in Patients With Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: Role of Sex,” CJC Open 3, no. 12 Suppl (2021): S44–S52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Olshansky B., Cannom D., Fedorowski A., et al., “Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS): A Critical Assessment,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 63, no. 3 (2020): 263–270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. DesJardin J. T., Chikwe J., Hahn R. T., Hung J. W., and Delling F. N., “Sex Differences and Similarities in Valvular Heart Disease,” Circulation Research 130, no. 4 (2022): 455–473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Acute Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease in Australia. (AIHW, Australian Government, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Townsend N., Wilson L., Bhatnagar P., Wickramasinghe K., Rayner M., and Nichols M., “Cardiovascular Disease in Europe: Epidemiological Update 2016,” European Heart Journal 37, no. 42 (2016): 3232–3245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Martin S. S., Aday A. W., Almarzooq Z. I., et al., “2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association,” Circulation 149, no. 8 (2024): e347–e913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Rodgers J. L., Jones J., Bolleddu S. I., et al., “Cardiovascular Risks Associated With Gender and Aging,” Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 6, no. 2 (2019): 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Taqueti V. R., “Sex Differences in the Coronary System.” in Sex‐Specific Analysis of Cardiovascular Function, eds. Kerkhof P. L. M. and Miller V. M. (Springer International Publishing, 2018), 257–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Faubion S. S., Kuhle C. L., Shuster L. T., and Rocca W. A., “Long‐Term Health Consequences of Premature or Early Menopause and Considerations for Management,” Climacteric 18, no. 4 (2015): 483–491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Maas A. H. E. M., Rosano G., Cifkova R., et al., “Cardiovascular Health After Menopause Transition, Pregnancy Disorders, and Other Gynaecologic Conditions: A Consensus Document From European Cardiologists, Gynaecologists, and Endocrinologists,” European Heart Journal 42, no. 10 (2021): 967–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. El Khoudary S. R., Aggarwal B., Beckie T. M., et al., “Menopause Transition and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Implications for Timing of Early Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association,” Circulation 142, no. 25 (2020): e506–e532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Mehta J. M. and Manson J. E., “The Menopausal Transition Period and Cardiovascular Risk,” Nature Reviews Cardiology 21, no. 3 (2024): 203–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Davis S. R., Lambrinoudaki I., Lumsden M., et al., “Menopause,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers 1 (2015): 15004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Turgeon J. L., Carr M. C., Maki P. M., Mendelsohn M. E., and Wise P. M., “Complex Actions of Sex Steroids In Adipose Tissue, the Cardiovascular System, and Brain: Insights From Basic Science and Clinical Studies,” Endocrine Reviews 27, no. 6 (2006): 575–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Janssen I., Powell L. H., Kazlauskaite R., and Dugan S. A., “Testosterone and Visceral Fat in Midlife Women: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Fat Patterning Study,” Obesity 18, no. 3 (2010): 604–610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Lambrinoudaki I., Paschou S. A., Armeni E., and Goulis D. G., “The Interplay Between Diabetes Mellitus and Menopause: Clinical Implications,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology 18, no. 10 (2022): 608–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Miller V. M. and Duckles S. P., “Vascular Actions of Estrogens: Functional Implications,” Pharmacological Reviews 60, no. 2 (2008): 210–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Moreau K. L., Hildreth K. L., Meditz A. L., Deane K. D., and Kohrt W. M., “Endothelial Function Is Impaired Across the Stages of the Menopause Transition in Healthy Women,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 97, no. 12 (2012): 4692–4700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. El Khoudary S. R., Wildman R. P., Matthews K., Thurston R. C., Bromberger J. T., and Sutton‐Tyrrell K., “Progression Rates of Carotid Intima‐Media Thickness and Adventitial Diameter During the Menopausal Transition,” Menopause 20, no. 1 (2013): 8–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Palmisano B. T., Zhu L., Eckel R. H., and Stafford J. M., “Sex Differences in Lipid and Lipoprotein Metabolism,” Molecular Metabolism 15 (2018): 45–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Yi S. W., Yi J. J., and Ohrr H., “Total Cholesterol and All‐Cause Mortality by Sex and Age: A Prospective Cohort Study Among 12.8 Million Adults,” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 1596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Phan B. A. and Toth P. P., “Dyslipidemia in Women: Etiology and Management,” International Journal of Women's Health 6 (2014): 185–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Desai M. K. and Brinton R. D., “Autoimmune Disease in Women: Endocrine Transition and Risk Across the Lifespan,” Frontiers in Endocrinology 10 (2019): 265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Conrad N., Verbeke G., Molenberghs G., et al., “Autoimmune Diseases and Cardiovascular Risk: A Population‐Based Study on 19 Autoimmune Diseases and 12 Cardiovascular Diseases in 22 Million Individuals in the UK,” Lancet 400, no. 10354 (2022): 733–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Aggarwal N. R., Patel H. N., Mehta L. S., et al., “Sex Differences in Ischemic Heart Disease: Advances, Obstacles, and Next Steps,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 11, no. 2 (2018): e004437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Shaw L. J., Min J. K., Nasir K., et al., “Sex Differences in Calcified Plaque and Long‐Term Cardiovascular Mortality: Observations From the CAC Consortium,” European Heart Journal 39, no. 41 (2018): 3727–3735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Han S. H., Bae J. H., D. R. Holmes, Jr. , et al., “Sex Differences In Atheroma Burden and Endothelial Function in Patients With Early Coronary Atherosclerosis,” European Heart Journal 29, no. 11 (2008): 1359–1369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Nelson M. R., Banks E., Brown A., et al., “2023 Australian Guideline for Assessing and Managing Cardiovascular Disease Risk,” Medical Journal of Australia 220, no. 9 (2024): 482–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Hageman S., Pennells L., Ojeda F., et al., “SCORE2 Risk Prediction Algorithms: New Models to Estimate 10‐year Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Europe,” European Heart Journal 42, no. 25 (2021): 2439–2454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Berin E., Hammar M., Lindblom H., Lindh‐Åstrand L., Rubér M., and Spetz Holm A. C., “Resistance Training for Hot Flushes in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomised Controlled Trial,” Maturitas 126 (2019): 55–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Hays J., Ockene J. K., Brunner R. L., et al., “Effects of Estrogen Plus Progestin on Health‐Related Quality of Life,” New England Journal of Medicine 348, no. 19 (2003): 1839–1854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Hodis H. N., Mack W. J., Henderson V. W., et al., “Vascular Effects of Early Versus Late Postmenopausal Treatment With Estradiol,” New England Journal of Medicine 374, no. 13 (2016): 1221–1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators I., “Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial,” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 288, no. 3 (2002): 321–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Manson J. E., Chlebowski R. T., Stefanick M. L., et al., “Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Health Outcomes During the Intervention and Extended Poststopping Phases of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trials,” Journal of the American Medical Association 310, no. 13 (2013): 1353–1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Thurston R. C., Johnson B. D., Shufelt C. L., et al., “Menopausal Symptoms and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE),” Menopause 24, no. 2 (2017): 126–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Thurston R. C., Sutton‐Tyrrell K., Everson‐Rose S. A., Hess R., and Matthews K. A., “Hot Flashes and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease: Findings From the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation Heart Study,” Circulation 118, no. 12 (2008): 1234–1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Shufelt C. L. and Manson J. E., “Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Disease: The Role of Formulation, Dose, and Route of Delivery,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 106, no. 5 (2021): 1245–1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Canonico M., Fournier A., Carcaillon L., et al., “Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Risk of Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism: Results From the E3N Cohort Study,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 30, no. 2 (2010): 340–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Canonico M., Oger E., Plu‐Bureau G., et al., “Hormone Therapy and Venous Thromboembolism Among Postmenopausal Women: Impact of the Route of Estrogen Administration and Progestogens: The ESTHER Study,” Circulation 115, no. 7 (2007): 840–845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Blum A., “Gender Differences in Vascular Aging and in Coronary Artery Disease Pathophysiology,” QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 116, no. 9 (2023): 745–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Earle N. J., Doughty R. N., Devlin G., et al., “Sex Differences In Outcomes After Acute Coronary Syndrome Vary With Age: A New Zealand National Study,” European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care 13, no. 3 (2023): 284–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Mankad R. and Best P. J., “Cardiovascular Disease in Older Women: A Challenge in Diagnosis and Treatment,” Women's Health 4, no. 5 (2008): 449–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Ji H., Kwan A. C., Chen M. T., et al., “Sex Differences in Myocardial and Vascular Aging,” Circulation Research 130, no. 4 (2022): 566–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Heiat A., Gross C. P., and Krumholz H. M., “Representation of the Elderly, Women, and Minorities in Heart Failure Clinical Trials,” Archives of Internal Medicine 162, no. 15 (2002), 10.1001/archinte.162.15.1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. You B., Zhu B., Su X., Liu F., and Wang B., “Gender Differences Among Elderly Patients With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Aging and Disease 9, no. 5 (2018): 852–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Lindley K. J., Aggarwal N. R., Briller J. E., et al., “Socioeconomic Determinants of Health and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Women,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 78, no. 19 (2021): 1919–1929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Golaszewski N. M., LaCroix A. Z., Godino J. G., et al., “Evaluation of Social Isolation, Loneliness, and Cardiovascular Disease Among Older Women in the US,” JAMA Network Open 5, no. 2 (2022): e2146461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Seegers L. M., Araki M., Nakajima A., et al., “Sex Differences in Culprit Plaque Characteristics Among Different Age Groups in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes,” Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 15, no. 6 (2022): e011612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Shikuma A., Nishi M., and Matoba S., “Sex Differences in Process‐of‐Care and In‐Hospital Prognosis Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction,” Circulation Journal 88, no. 8 (2024): 1201–1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Zhao M., Woodward M., Vaartjes I., et al., “Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Medication Prescription in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of the American Heart Association 9, no. 11 (2020): e014742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. McEvoy J. W., McCarthy C. P., Bruno R. M., et al., “2024 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension],” Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006) 25, no. 11 (2024): 1e–107e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Regitz‐Zagrosek V., “Sex and Gender Differences In Heart Failure,” International Journal of Heart Failure 2, no. 3 (2020): 157–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Sun J., Tai S., Guo Y., et al., “Sex Differences in Characteristics and Outcomes in Elderly Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Post‐Hoc Analysis From TOPCAT,” Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 8 (2021): 721850, 10.3389/fcvm.2021.721850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Lam C. S., Carson P. E., Anand I. S., et al., “Sex Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction,” Circulation. Heart failure 5, no. 5 (2012): 571–578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Maddox T. M., Januzzi J. L., Allen L. A., et al., “2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 83, no. 15 (2024): 1444–1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Santema B. T., Ouwerkerk W., Tromp J., et al., “Identifying Optimal Doses of Heart Failure Medications in Men Compared With Women: A Prospective, Observational, Cohort Study,” Lancet 394, no. 10205 (2019): 1254–1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Park E. and Safdar Z., “Pulmonary Hypertension in Women,” Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal 20, no. 2 (2024): 70–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Humbert M., Kovacs G., Hoeper M. M., et al., “2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension,” European Heart Journal 43, no. 38 (2022): 3618–3731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Ko D., Rahman F., Schnabel R. B., Yin X., Benjamin E. J., and Christophersen I. E., “Atrial Fibrillation in Women: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Presentation, and Prognosis,” Nature Reviews Cardiology 13, no. 6 (2016): 321–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Humphries K. H., Kerr C. R., Connolly S. J., et al., “New‐Onset Atrial Fibrillation,” Circulation 103, no. 19 (2001): 2365–2370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Yong C. M., Tremmel J. A., Lansberg M. G., Fan J., Askari M., and Turakhia M. P., “Sex Differences in Oral Anticoagulation and Outcomes of Stroke and Intracranial Bleeding in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation,” Journal of the American Heart Association 9, no. 10 (2020): e015689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Avierinos J. F., Inamo J., Grigioni F., Gersh B., Shub C., and Enriquez‐Sarano M., “Sex Differences in Morphology and Outcomes of Mitral Valve Prolapse,” Annals of Internal Medicine 149, no. 11 (2008): 787–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Smith C. R., Leon M. B., Mack M. J., et al., “Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic‐Valve Replacement in High‐Risk Patients,” New England Journal of Medicine 364, no. 23 (2011): 2187–2198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Martínez‐Gómez J., de Cos‐Gandoy A., Fernández‐Alvira J. M., et al., “Cardiovascular Health Trajectories in Adolescence and Their Association With Sociodemographic and Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Spain,” Journal of Adolescent Health 74, no. 5 (2024): 1039–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Park K., Bairey Merz C. N., Bello N. A., et al., “Management of Women With Acquired Cardiovascular Disease From Pre‐Conception Through Pregnancy and Postpartum,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 77, no. 14 (2021): 1799–1812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. DeVon H. A., Mirzaei S., and Zègre‐Hemsey J., “Typical and Atypical Symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Time to Retire the Terms?,” Journal of the American Heart Association 9, no. 7 (2020): e015539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Endocrinology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES