Skip to main content
Frontiers in Neurology logoLink to Frontiers in Neurology
. 2026 Apr 15;17:1789842. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1789842

Glymphatic dysfunction across sleep disorders: a meta-analysis of DTI-ALPS studies

Xiaoxin Zhang 1, Dongmei He 2,*
PMCID: PMC13124995  PMID: 42064983

Abstract

Background

Sleep disorders are increasingly linked to glymphatic dysfunction, but whether this impairment is universal across different sleep pathologies remains unclear.

Objective

This meta-analysis examined whether glymphatic dysfunction, assessed via the diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) index, may represent a shared neural feature across a spectrum of sleep disorders.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 31, 2025, for observational studies comparing DTI-ALPS index between patients with sleep disorders and healthy controls. Data were synthesized from 19 studies (n = 2,315) using a random-effects model to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs). Methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessment were performed.

Results

The pooled analysis revealed significant global glymphatic impairment in patients with sleep disorders (SMD = −1.60, 95% CI [−2.65, −0.54], p = 0.003), indicating global glymphatic dysfunction. However, heterogeneity was extremely high (I2 = 94.7%). Disorder-specific analyses showed pronounced deficits in obstructive sleep apnea (SMD = −0.92, p < 0.001) and idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (SMD = −0.63, p = 0.004), as well as in PSQI-defined poor sleep (SMD = −0.50, p < 0.001). Results for insomnia and narcolepsy were non-significant and highly heterogeneous. Meta-regression identified no significant moderators; publication bias was detected (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Glymphatic dysfunction, as assessed by DTI-ALPS, is consistently observed across several sleep disorders, suggesting a potential shared pathway. However, extreme heterogeneity limits interpretability of the pooled effect, and cross-sectional data preclude causal inference.

Keywords: diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space, DTI-ALPS, glymphatic dysfunction, meta-analysis, sleep disorders

Introduction

Sleep disorders, as defined by the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-3), extend beyond mere disruptions of normal sleep patterns; they represent pervasive challenges to central nervous system homeostasis with profound implications for long-term brain health (1). Beyond the well-established consequences of sleep fragmentation, an emerging pathophysiological model positions dysregulation of the brain’s glymphatic system as a central mechanism linking disordered sleep to neurodegenerative risk (2, 3).

The glymphatic system is a macroscopic waste-clearance network that facilitates efficient exchange of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) through specialized perivascular tunnels (4). Its activity is strongly sleep-state dependent, with solutes, including neurotoxic metabolites such as amyloid-β, being cleared most effectively during slow-wave sleep (3). Consequently, chronic sleep disruption is hypothesized to induce a state of functional glymphatic insufficiency, creating a permissive environment for pathological protein accumulation and increasing susceptibility to a range of neurological disorders (5, 6). Within this framework, measurable alterations in glymphatic function may serve as a candidate biomarker; however, cross-sectional associations do not establish diagnostic validity, and longitudinal data are lacking.

The recent introduction of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Analysis along the Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS) has provided a transformative, non-invasive method to assess human glymphatic dynamics in vivo. By quantifying water-diffusion anisotropy specifically along the perivascular spaces of deep medullary veins, the DTI-ALPS index acts as a proxy for glymphatic fluid-transport efficiency (7). Its validation in neurodegenerative contexts renders it an ideal tool for investigating the sleep–glymphatic–neurodegeneration axis.

Although the foundational link between sleep and glymphatic clearance is established, a critical question remains: Is glymphatic impairment a universal or disorder-specific feature across the spectrum of sleep pathologies? Current evidence remains fragmented, lacking a synthesized quantitative assessment. This meta-analysis therefore aims to definitively quantify and compare glymphatic activity, as measured by the DTI-ALPS index, across various sleep-disordered populations and healthy controls, and to elucidate whether glymphatic dysfunction constitutes a shared pathophysiological pathway.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval was not required for this study as it was a meta-analysis based on data extracted from previously published studies, which did not involve direct contact with human participants or animals. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (8).

Literature search and eligibility criteria

A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception until December 31, 2025. The search strategy employed a comprehensive combination of keywords on “DTI-ALPS” OR “diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space” (Supplementary Table). The full search strings for each database are provided in the Supplementary materials.

Studies were included if they met the following pre-specified criteria: (1) enrolled adult human participants with a formal diagnosis of a sleep disorder according to ICSD-3 criteria, including insomnia, sleep-disordered breathing, hypersomnolence, circadian rhythm disorders, parasomnias, and sleep-related movement disorders; (2) Presented a cross-sectional comparison of glymphatic function between patient cohorts and healthy controls using the DTI-ALPS index; (3) provided extractable DTI-ALPS index data in the form of mean and standard deviation. No restrictions were placed on publication language or date. Studies enrolling participants with primary neurodegenerative diseases (Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease) were included only if they reported a sleep disorder diagnosis as a secondary or comorbid condition; these were categorized as ‘mixed sleep disorders’ and subjected to sensitivity analysis.

Data extraction and outcomes

Two independent reviewers (X. Z. and D. H.) extracted data from each included study using a standardized data extraction form. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion or, if necessary, consultation with a third reviewer. The following information was extracted: first author, year of publication, country, study design, sample size (patients and controls), demographic characteristics (age, sex distribution), sleep disorder diagnosis (as per ICSD-3 criteria), MRI field strength, DTI-ALPS index values (mean and standard deviation for each group), and methodological quality indicators (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale scores, NOS). The NOS evaluates studies across three key domains: sample selection (0–4 stars), comparability of groups (0–2 stars), and ascertainment of the exposure or outcome (0–3 stars), with a higher score indicating superior quality (9).

The primary outcome was the glymphatic function, quantified by the DTI-ALPS index. The DTI-ALPS index is a continuous measure derived from diffusion tensor imaging, reflecting water diffusivity along perivascular spaces; lower values indicate greater glymphatic impairment. For each study, we extracted the mean DTI-ALPS index and its standard deviation for both the sleep disorder group and the healthy control group.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.0) with the “meta” package. The primary effect measure was the standardized mean difference (SMD) in the DTI-ALPS index between patients with sleep disorders and healthy controls. A random-effects model was employed to account for anticipated clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic.

To assess the potential impact of publication bias, we performed both Egger’s regression test and trim-and-fill analysis. Pre-specified meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The robustness of the pooled findings was tested through sensitivity analyses, including leave-one-out procedures and subgroup analyses stratified by specific sleep-disorder diagnoses.

Results

Study selection and cohort characteristics

This systematic search identified 19 eligible studies (1028), comprising a total of 2,315 participants (1,090 patients with sleep disorders and 1,225 healthy controls) (Figure 1). Included studies covered major sleep-disorder categories: four studies each for insomnia disorder and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); three studies each for narcolepsy and idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD); one for restless legs syndrome (RLS); two for mixed sleep disorders; and two that defined poor sleep quality based on a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score >5 (Table 1; Supplementary Table).

Figure 1.

Flowchart illustrating the systematic selection of studies for review. Records identified from five databases totaled eight hundred twenty-two, with four hundred seventy-seven duplicates removed. Three hundred forty-five records were screened; two hundred fifty-two were excluded as irrelevant, seventy reports were not retrieved due to being non-sleep disorders, and four were excluded for unavailable DTI-ALPS index. Nineteen studies were ultimately included in the review.

PRISMA flow diagram for the systematic review.

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

Study Sample size (Disorder/Control) Age (years) Disorder/Control Female (%) Disorder/Control Spectrum Quality
Li et al. (2024) (10) 114 (43/71) 62.7 ± 9.8/60.0 ± 9.3 25.6/43.7 Sleep disorder (mixed) 3/2/2
Shang et al. (2024) (11) 65 (40/25) 68.6 ± 6.2/67.4 ± 7.1 65.0/52.0 Sleep disorder (mixed) 3/2/2
Zhou et al. (2024) (12) 61 (29/32) 54.5 ± 1.5/55.5 ± 1.1 41.4/53.1 Insomnia disorder 4/1/2
Qian et al. (2024) (13) 49 (28/21) 71.7 ± 7.5/71.7 ± 7.5 57.1/57.1 Insomnia disorder 2/1/2
Yu et al. (2024) (14) 53 (33/20) 57.3 ± 5.3/58.0 ± 5.8 90.9/80.0 Insomnia disorder 4/2/2
Ruifang et al. (2025) (15) 62 (25/37) 52.9 ± 1.9/32.5 ± 2.7 68.0/59.5 Insomnia disorder 4/2/2
Ho-Joon et al. (2022) (16) 48 (24/24) 62.0 ± 15.0/63.7 ± 6.3 37.5/41.7 OSA 4/2/2
Bhaswati et al. (2022) (17) 121 (59/62) 49.9 ± 10.0/50.1 ± 10.4 40.7/45.2 OSA 4/2/2
Shiwei et al. (2024) (18) 155 (105/50) 33.4 ± 8.9/37.0 ± 8.6 23.8/34.0 OSA 4/2/2
Zhenliang et al. (2024) (19) 65 (31/34) 39.9 ± 9.3/43.2 ± 8.5 9.7/14.7 OSA 4/2/2
Ekim et al. (2022) (20) 36 (25/11) 33.5 ± 4.2/36.0 ± 6.8 60.0/54.5 Narcolepsy 4/2/2
Pengxin et al. (2024) (21) 83 (41/42) 19.0 ± 2.0/21.5 ± 1.5 46.3/57.1 Narcolepsy 4/2/2
Eva et al. (2025) (22) 23 (12/11) 33.3 ± 10.5/31.8 ± 13.4 33.3/36.4 Narcolepsy 4/2/2
Xiaoli et al. (2022) (23) 248 (119/129) 61.9 ± 7.6/62.0 ± 7.2 47.9/54.3 iRBD 3/2/2
Dong et al. (2022) (24) 36 (18/18) 69.3 ± 7.2/67.3 ± 6.2 38.9/38.9 iRBD 4/2/2
Yun Jung et al. (2023) (25) 40 (20/20) 73.0 ± 7.0/73.0 ± 6.9 40.0/40.0 iRBD 4/2/2
Kang Min (2023) (26) 120 (69/51) 57.0 ± 6.7/55.9 ± 8.1 71.0/74.5 RLS 4/2/2
Yuya et al. (2023) (27) 832 (317/515) 28.7 ± 3.5/28.8 ± 3.7 44.8/45.2 Poor sleep (PSQI>5) 3/2/2
Junko et al. (2024) (28) 104 (52/52) 73.1 ± 5.7/73.8 ± 4.3 57.7/57.7 Poor sleep (PSQI>5) 3/2/2

OSA, obstructive sleep apnea. iRBD, idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index. RLS, restless legs syndrome.

Methodological quality and heterogeneity profile

Methodological quality, assessed via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), was consistently high (scores ranging from 5 to 8 stars; mean ± SD: 7.5 ± 0.8), indicating robust study designs with rigorous participant selection, appropriate adjustment for comparability, and valid ascertainment of the DTI-ALPS outcome.

Global and disorder-specific glymphatic impairment

Primary meta-analysis revealed significant global impairment of glymphatic function in patients with sleep disorders compared to healthy controls, evidenced by a marked reduction in the pooled DTI-ALPS index (SMD = −1.60, 95% CI [−2.65, −0.54], p = 0.003). The extreme heterogeneity observed (I2 = 94.7%) likely reflects underlying pathophysiological diversity across sleep disorders rather than statistical artifact (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Forest plot summarizing standardized mean differences for multiple studies comparing various sleep disorders to control groups, including insomnia, OSA, narcolepsy, iRBD, RLS, and poor sleep. Each disorder is grouped with individual study estimates, confidence intervals, means, and standard deviations for both experimental and control groups. Diamonds represent overall effect sizes for each spectrum and combined effects, with weights for common and random effects models. Heterogeneity statistics and tests for subgroup differences are displayed at the bottom.

Forest plot of the pooled DTI-ALPS index using standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The pooled analysis demonstrated significant DTI-ALPS reductions in overall sleep disorders (SMD = −1.60, 95% CI [−2.65, −0.54], p = 0.003; I2 = 94.7%), with pronounced deficits in OSA (p < 0.001), iRBD (p = 0.004), and PSQI-defined poor sleep (p < 0.001). Insomnia disorder (p = 0.086) and narcolepsy (p = 0.111) showed non-significant trends.

Subgroup analyses indicated a gradient of glymphatic compromise across specific diagnoses. The most pronounced deficits were observed in OSA (SMD = −0.92, p < 0.001; I2 = 75.7%) and iRBD (SMD = −0.63, p = 0.004; I2 = 53.7%)—disorders with strong mechanistic links to intermittent hypoxia and protein aggregation, respectively. PSQI-defined poor sleep also showed significant, albeit more modest, impairment (SMD = −0.50, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%).

In contrast, pooled estimates for insomnia disorder (SMD = −3.97, p = 0.086) and narcolepsy (SMD = −1.02, p = 0.111) did not reach statistical significance. These non-significant associations were characterized by exceptionally high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.4 and 88.3%, respectively), suggesting that these averages mask substantial underlying variability related to differences in patient phenotyping, disease chronicity, or imaging protocols, rather than indicating a true absence of effect.

Heterogeneity and bias

Sensitivity analyses, including leave-one-out procedures, confirmed the overall robustness of the primary findings (Figure 3). Pre-specified meta-regression indicated that neither demographic variables (age, gender), sample size, sleep-disorder spectrum, study quality (NOS score), nor MRI parameters (field strength, b value, ROI definition) significantly explained the observed heterogeneity (all p > 0.05).

Figure 3.

Forest plot illustrating leave-one-out sensitivity analysis for a meta-analysis, listing individual studies omitted on the left and displaying standardized mean difference (SMD), 95 percent confidence intervals, p-values, Tau2, Tau, and I2 values for each omission; the common effect model SMD is minus 0.66 with a 95 percent confidence interval of minus 0.74 to minus 0.57, p-value less than 0.0001, Tau2 is 5.3845, Tau is 2.3204, and I2 is 94.7 percent.

Sensitivity analysis evaluating robustness of pooled results. Sensitivity analyses were performed by sequentially excluding individual studies and recalculating the pooled effect estimates using a fixed-effects model. The consistency of effect sizes across all iterations confirms the robustness of the synthesized outcomes.

Egger’s regression test indicated substantial publication bias (p = 0.010). The adjusted pooled SMD by trim-and-fill analysis remained significant and showed virtually no change (SMD = −1.59, 95% CI [−2.66, −0.54]), indicating that publication bias had little impact on the magnitude of the effect (Supplementary Trim-and-Fill).

To address potential confounding by underlying neurodegeneration, we performed a sensitivity analysis excluding the two studies with comorbid neurodegenerative conditions. The pooled SMD was −1.48 (95% CI [−2.57, −0.39], p < 0.001, I2 = 93.9%).

Discussion

This meta-analysis suggests for the first time that glymphatic dysfunction, as assessed by the DTI-ALPS index, may represent a shared neural correlate across a spectrum of sleep pathologies. The substantial pooled effect size (SMD = −1.60) is consistent with major disruption of the brain’s fluid-transport system, positioning glymphatic impairment as a potential pathophysiological amplifier linking disordered sleep to long-term brain health. However, the extreme heterogeneity (I2 = 94.7%) substantially limits the interpretability of the global pooled estimate. While this heterogeneity may reflect the etiologic diversity of sleep disorders and their distinct interactions with neurofluid dynamics (29), it also precludes a simple unified interpretation. Therefore, findings should be interpreted primarily through the lens of disorder-specific subgroup analyses.

A key finding is the differential gradient of glymphatic impairment across specific disorders. The most robust deficits were observed in OSA and iRBD—two conditions with well-defined, albeit distinct, mechanisms converging on perivascular clearance. In OSA, chronic intermittent hypoxia is hypothesized to disrupt the polarized expression of astrocytic AQP4 water channels, a cornerstone of glymphatic influx. In iRBD, early accumulation of α-synuclein aggregates may physically obstruct perivascular conduits, impeding fluid flow (30, 31). This disorder-specificity suggests that glymphatic dysfunction is not a monolithic outcome but may be mediated by distinct molecular and cellular pathways across different sleep pathologies.

In contrast, the non-significant pooled estimates for insomnia and narcolepsy were accompanied by I2 values exceeding 85%, indicating that high heterogeneity prevents firm conclusions; future standardized studies with consistent phenotyping and imaging protocols are needed. The observed variability likely stems from differences in disease chronicity and patient selection rather than indicating a true absence of glymphatic involvement.

A potential confound warranting explicit consideration is the inclusion of studies with comorbid neurodegenerative conditions (Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease). Sensitivity analysis excluding these two studies yielded a pooled SMD of −1.48, which remained significant but was attenuated compared to the primary analysis. This suggests that while neurodegeneration contributes to the observed glymphatic impairment, it does not fully account for it. Future studies should carefully disentangle the relative contributions of primary sleep pathology versus underlying neurodegenerative disease.

The inability of meta-regression to identify significant moderators points to the influence of unmeasured technical and biological variables. Notably, DTI-ALPS measurement is highly sensitive to MRI acquisition parameters (e.g., field strength, b-values, ROI definition), which were not uniformly reported. Moreover, DTI-ALPS is an indirect measure; it reflects anisotropic water diffusivity along medullary veins and may be influenced by white matter integrity, small vessel disease, venous architecture, and partial volume effects. It does not directly quantify perivascular fluid transport. Furthermore, reliance on subjective PSQI scores to define “poor sleep” may have introduced phenotypic misclassification, as subjective sleep quality often diverges from objective polysomnographic measures (32). The detected publication bias underscores a literature potentially skewed toward dramatic positive findings, warranting cautious interpretation of the pooled effect magnitude, particularly in smaller subgroups.

Therapeutically, these findings suggest a potential avenue for mechanistically targeted sleep interventions. Preliminary evidence indicating the potential reversibility of this system (3335) raises the hypothesis that treatments improving sleep architecture or mitigating specific insults (e.g., hypoxia in OSA) could augment waste clearance. However, whether DTI-ALPS can serve as a dynamic biomarker in clinical trials requires prospective validation.

Limitations and future directions

This study has several limitations inherent to its design. First, the cross-sectional nature of all included data precludes causal inference; we cannot determine whether glymphatic dysfunction precedes or follows sleep disorders. Second, the DTI-ALPS index, while promising, remains an indirect proxy that does not directly measure perivascular fluid transport. It is influenced by microstructural integrity, vascular factors, and technical parameters, which may confound interpretations. Third, the inclusion of studies with comorbid neurodegenerative disease introduces potential confounding; although sensitivity analysis suggested persistence of the effect, residual confounding cannot be excluded. Fourth, the extreme heterogeneity (I2 = 94.7%) limits the interpretability of the global pooled effect, and the limited number of studies precluded more comprehensive meta-regression analyses.

Future research should transition to longitudinal designs, integrating DTI-ALPS with molecular neuroimaging (e.g., amyloid-PET), CSF biomarkers, and direct measures of glymphatic function (e.g., perivascular space dynamics) to establish temporal sequence and biological specificity. There is an urgent need for international consortia to standardize DTI-ALPS acquisition and processing pipelines, including consensus on ROI definitions, b-value selection, and quality control procedures. Finally, expanding this research into pre-symptomatic and pediatric cohorts will be vital to determine whether glymphatic dysfunction is a precursor or a consequence of chronic sleep disruption.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests that glymphatic dysfunction, as assessed by DTI-ALPS, may represent a shared pathophysiological feature across several sleep disorders, particularly OSA and iRBD. However, extreme heterogeneity, publication bias, the inclusion of studies with comorbid neurodegeneration, and the cross-sectional nature of available data warrant cautious interpretation. DTI-ALPS remains an emerging proxy measure; its clinical utility requires validation through longitudinal and interventional studies that directly link it to clinical outcomes and disease progression.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Edited by: Anna Szucs, Queen Victoria Hospital, United Kingdom

Reviewed by: Monica Puligheddu, University of Cagliari, Italy

Daniele Botta, University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland

Abbreviations: DTI-ALPS, diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

XZ: Writing – review & editing. DH: Writing – original draft.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1789842/full#supplementary-material

Data_Sheet_1.PDF (45.7KB, PDF)
Data_Sheet_2.PDF (43KB, PDF)

References

  • 1.Christophe G, Régis L, Pierre AM, Charles M, Kelly G, Élodie G, et al. A systematic analysis of ICSD-3 diagnostic criteria and proposal for further structured iteration. Sleep Med Rev. (2021) 58:101439. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berton G, Moreira M, Rodrigues A, Donadon I, Calza F, Menegat É, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in sleep deprived patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis (P8-9.008). Neurology. (2024) 102:6885. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208155 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Klostranec J, Vucevic D, Bhatia K, Kortman H, Krings T, Murphy K, et al. Current concepts in intracranial interstitial fluid transport and the Glymphatic system: part I-anatomy and physiology. Radiology. (2021) 301:502–14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao L, Tannenbaum A, Bakker E, Benveniste H. Physiology of Glymphatic solute transport and waste clearance from the brain. Physiology (Bethesda). (2022) 37, 349–362. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00015.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.James M, Marcos GW, Jonathan P, Sandip R. Sleep function: toward elucidating an enigma. Sleep Med Rev. (2015) 28:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jun Z, Shengwen L, Yaqi W, Zhijian T, Yasong W, Yiwei Q, et al. Enlarged perivascular space and index for diffusivity along the perivascular space as emerging neuroimaging biomarkers of neurological diseases. Cell Mol Neurobiol. (2024) 44:14. doi: 10.1007/s10571-023-01440-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Toshiaki T, Rintaro I, Rei N, Toshiki N, Hisashi K, Shinji N. Diffusion tensor image analysis ALong the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS): revisiting the meaning and significance of the method. Magn Reson Med Sci. (2024) 23:268–90. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2023-0175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wells B.S., O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in Meta-analyses. Spring, (2000). Available online at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li Y, Zhang T, Wang C, Geng L, Liu T, Lu T, et al. The impact of sleep disorders on Glymphatic function in Parkinson's disease using diffusion tensor MRI. Acad Radiol. (2025) 32:2209–19. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.030, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shang Y, Yu L, Xing H, Chang Y, Dong K, Xiao Y, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) demonstrates that sleep disorders exacerbate Glymphatic circulatory impairment and cognitive impairment in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Nat Sci Sleep. (2024) 16:2205–15. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S496607, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou Y, Yi M, Li X, Wang T, Jiang Y, Zhang L, et al. Enlarged choroid plexus related to atrophy of hippocampal subfield volumes and glymphatic dysfunction in benzodiazepine use disorder. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2024). doi: 10.1111/bcp.16328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Qian G, Jingcai M, Mingqiang S, Hongxuan F, Xiaofeng D, Daqiang X, et al. Relationship of Glymphatic function with cognitive impairment, sleep disorders, anxiety and depression in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2024) 20:1809–21. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S480183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yu J, Wenmin Z, Mengjie Y, Jie L, Yang D, Weidong W, et al. Glymphatic system dysfunction in middle-aged and elderly chronic insomnia patients with cognitive impairment evidenced by diffusion tensor imaging along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS). Sleep Med. (2024) 115:145–51. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.01.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ruifang X, Jie F, Hanting Z, Chengyi L, Pengxin H, Yu Z, et al. Evaluation of glymphatic system dysfunction in patients with insomnia via diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space. Quant Imaging Med Surg. (2025) 15:1114–24. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ho-Joon L, Dong Ah L, Kyong Jin S, Kang Min P. Glymphatic system dysfunction in obstructive sleep apnea evidenced by DTI-ALPS. Sleep Med. (2022) 89:176–81. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bhaswati R, Alba N, Ravi A, Daniel SK, Susana WV, Rajesh K. Impaired Glymphatic system actions in obstructive sleep apnea adults. Front Neurosci. (2022) 16:884234. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.884234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shiwei L, Xiaoshan L, Shengli C, Qunjun L, Ying L, Fajian W, et al. Association of MRI indexes of the perivascular space network and cognitive impairment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Radiology. (2024) 311:e232274. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhenliang X, Mingxian B, Zhongxin W, Rongpin W, Chong T, Lihui W, et al. Resting-state fMRI network efficiency as a mediator in the relationship between the glymphatic system and cognitive function in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome: insights from a DTI-ALPS investigation. Sleep Med. (2024) 119:250–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ekim G, Elif A, Irsel TF, Emine Ulku S, Kader K. Assessment of glymphatic function in narcolepsy using DTI-ALPS index. Sleep Med. (2022) 101:522–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pengxin H, Yuqing Y, Yu Z, Ruifang X, Jiankun D, Xihai Z, et al. Alterations in the DTI-ALPS index and choroid plexus volume are associated with clinical symptoms in participants with narcolepsy type 1. Sleep Med. (2024) 124:471–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.10.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eva M, Jari G, Gert Jan KL, Ysbrand DW, Matthias RO, Rolf JRF, et al. MRI-based surrogates of brain clearance in narcolepsy type 1. J Sleep Res. (2025) 34:e14479. doi: 10.1111/jsr.14479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xiaoli S, Tao G, Zhiyun W, Yi F, Luyan G, Lanxiao C, et al. Neuroimaging evidence of glymphatic system dysfunction in possible REM sleep behavior disorder and Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. (2022) 8:54. doi: 10.1038/s41531-022-00316-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dong Ah L, Ho-Joon L, Kang Min P. Glymphatic dysfunction in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder. Acta Neurol Scand. (2021) 145:464–70. doi: 10.1111/ane.13573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yun Jung B, Jong-Min K, Byung Se C, Nayoung R, Yoo Sung S, Yoonho N, et al. Altered brain Glymphatic flow at diffusion-tensor MRI in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Radiology. (2023) 307:e221848. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kang Min P, Keun Tae K, Dong Ah L, Gholam M, Won CY. Glymphatic system dysfunction in restless legs syndrome: evidenced by diffusion tensor imaging along the perivascular space. Sleep. (2023) 46:zsad239. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yuya S, Yayoi H, Koji K, Junko K, Takeshi M, Christina A, et al. Glymphatic system impairment in sleep disruption: diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS). Jpn J Radiol. (2023) 41:1335–43. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01463-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Junko K, Koji K, Kaito T, Yayoi H, Toshiaki T, Yuya S, et al. Decreased water diffusivity along the perivascular space in older adults with poor sleep quality. J Neurosci Res. (2024) 102:e70005. doi: 10.1002/jnr.70005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ni C, Chen L, Lin R, Zheng W, Cai Y, Cai G, et al. Diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the diagnosis and severity assessment of Parkinson's disease. Quant Imaging Med Surg. (2025) 15:1411–24. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu S, Li H, Shen Y, Zhu W, Wang Y, Wang J, et al. Aqp4Moxibustion improves hypothalamus polarization in APP/PS1 mice: evidence from spatial transcriptomics. Front Aging Neurosci. (2023) 15:1069155. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1069155, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dario V, Jaromira K, Jiri N, Dean L. Alpha-Synuclein aggregates associated with mitochondria in Tunnelling nanotubes. Neurotox Res. (2020) 39:429–43. doi: 10.1007/s12640-020-00285-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xiaofan Z, Xin Z, Lei Z, Wenjuan L, You X, Yonghua Z, et al. Discordant subjective perception of sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and insomnia: a retrospective study. Med Sci Monit. (2022) 28:e937134. doi: 10.12659/MSM.937134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wanbin H, Yu Z, Yanjie Z, Jiabin Z, Tao Q, Luyu H, et al. Glymphatic dysfunction in migraine mice model. Neuroscience. (2023) 528:64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.07.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhengkun Y, Shiyuan G, Jiana Z, Yue Z, Huiming L, Yuhan L, et al. Sleep disturbances are related to glymphatic dysfunction in blepharospasm. Neuroscience. (2025) 573:228–36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.03.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ying L, Shiwei L, Zheng G, Qunjun L, Yanyu Z, Xiaoshan L, et al. Decoupling of global signal and cerebrospinal fluid inflow is associated with cognitive decline in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Sleep Med. (2025) 129:330–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data_Sheet_1.PDF (45.7KB, PDF)
Data_Sheet_2.PDF (43KB, PDF)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Neurology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES