Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2026 Mar;26(1):124–133. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v26i1.14

Impact of metabolic syndrome on the progression of arterial stiffness in people of African ancestry

Omotayo Alaba Eluwole 1,3,, Adeleye Adeomi 2, Kgothathso Nkoana 3, Muzi Joseph Maseko 3
PMCID: PMC13126133  PMID: 42063910

Abstract

Background

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is an atherogenic risk factor influenced by both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, including race, hypertension, obesity, and age. This study evaluated the association between MS and arterial stiffness (AS) in individuals of African ancestry.

Methods

Using WHO criteria, MS was assessed in 668 participants aged 18-70 years. Obesity was evaluated through body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Blood pressure (BP) measurements included office BP, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and daytime/nighttime BP. Arterial stiffness was assessed via pulse wave velocity (PWV). Blood samples were analyzed for triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and fasting blood glucose. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and STATA.

Results

The prevalence of metabolic syndrome increased with age and was significantly higher in females. Participants with MS had a higher prevalence of hypertension and obesity. PWV was significantly associated with BP parameters and obesity indices (BMI, WC, WHR). Moreover, PWV was higher in individuals with MS compared to those without.

Conclusion

Obesity and hypertension, key diagnostic components of MS, are independently associated with arterial stiffness. This underscores their role in driving target organ damage among individuals with MS in this African ancestry cohort.

Keywords: Metabolic Syndrome, Arterial Stiffness, Pulse Wave Velocity

Introduction

World Health Organization emphasised five major components of metabolic syndrome, which include obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, and microalbuminuria1,2. Central or abdominal obesity is the first criterion attributed to metabolic syndrome (MS), simultaneously, it is also a risk factor for other components of MS1,2. Crude assessment of anthropometric measures of abdominal obesity, such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-hip ratio (WHR) are strong and consistent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity3,4. Several studies have demonstrated that all components of MS are independently associated with arterial stiffness (AS)5-7. Notably, the accuracy of the association is dependent on the component of MS and the ethnicity of the participants6,7. However, uncontrolled hypertension and obesity are atherosclerotic risk factors strongly associated with vascular remodeling and hardening of the inner layers of the aorta and other large arteries, known as AS. Arterial stiffness, is the hallmark of atherosclerosis5 a leading contributor to the rising incidence of cardiovascular complications of MS. It is the macroscopic manifestation of endothelia dysfunction that involves several signaling pathways such as renin aldosterone angiotensin (RAS), reactive oxidative stress (ROS), insulin resistance (IR) and metabolism of advanced glycation end (AGE) products5,6.

Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) is the gold standard for the assessment of AS. It is usually measured between the carotid and femoral artery. It is directly proportional to arterial wall width and the measurement of elastin and collagen concentration, or AS, and it is inversely proportional to vessel diameter and blood viscosity8. Hence, higher arterial wall width and stiffness may result in higher PWV. However, the accuracy of the association depends on the component of MS and the ethnicity7. This is associated with endothelial dysfunction in physological and pathological conditions such as aging, MS, hypertension, and obesity9. Notably, PWV increases proportionally to the number of cardiovascular risk factors9. Hence, our study investigated the association between assessment of AS (PWV), obesity, and hypertension among Africans with a high prevalence of the two major diagnostic criteria.

Methods

Study design and population

Participants were stratified according to WHO criteria for MS. Out of the 1516 participants, 668 fulfilled the stipulated requirements. Participants were provided with information sheets detailing the purpose and process of the study. Each participant gave written informed consent for his/her voluntary participation in the study.

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Witwatersrand, Human Research Ethics Committee [Medical (Reference number: M190472)].

Measurements and Biochemical analysis

i. Anthropometric measurement

Anthropometric measurement was assessed according to the methods described by Eluwole et al., 2022 [10].

ii. Conventional (clinic) blood pressure assessment

Conventional blood pressure was measured using an automated sphygmomanometer (Omron, Kyoto, Japan) after 10 min of rest in the seated position. A regular adult cuff of 12 cm wide and 30 cm long was used for arm circumferences less than 33 cm, while a large adult cuff of 16 cm wide and 36 cm long was used for arm circumference that is greater than 33 cm10. Brachial blood pressure was recorded to the nearest 2 mmHg. Korotkov phases I and V were identified as systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), respectively. Five consecutive BP readings were obtained. The average of the five readings was taken as the BP. Participants were classified as hypertensive if the mean value of blood pressure was higher than 140/90 mmHg (WHO standard for MS).

iii. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Ambulatory 24-hr day and night BP was determined using SpaceLabs monitors (model 90207; Spacelabs, Redmond, WA). The cuff size is the same as that used in conventional BP measurements. Monitors was programmed to measure 24-hr BP at 15 minutes intervals during the day time (6:00 - 22:00) and at 30 minutes interval during the night time (22:00 - 06:00). Fixed clock periods as opposed to actual in-bed and out of bed periods were statistically analysed to ensure that similar day and night periods was selected for comparison among individuals10,11,12.

iv. Pulse wave measurement and analysis

Aortic pulse wave velocity was determined using applanation tonometry and SphygmoCor software11. The participants rested for 15 minutes in a supine position. Arterial waveforms with an electrocardiogram recording were recorded at carotid-femoral pulse simultaneously by applanation tonometry during 8-second period using a high-fidelity SPC-301 micromanometer (Millar Instrument, Houston, TX) interfaced with a computer employing SphygmoCor, version 6.21 software AtCor, Medical, West Ryde, New South Wales, Australia). Recordings were discarded when the systolic or diastolic variability of consecutive waveforms exceeds 5% or when the amplitude of the pulse wave signal is < 80 mV. The time delay in the pulse wave between the carotid and femoral sites was determined using the R wave of electrocardiograph recordings as a fiducial point. Pulse transit time was taken as the average of 10 consecutive beats. Distance from the suprasternal notch to the carotid sampling site (distance A) and from the suprasternal notch to the femoral artery (distance B) was measured. Pulse wave velocity was calculated as distance B minus distance A. Aortic PWV was calculated as distance (meters) divided by transit time12,13.

v. Biochemical analysis

After an overnight fast, a 5ml of venous blood sample was collected from the cubital fossa using an aseptic procedure. Lipid profiles [Triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), High-density lipoprotein (HDL), and fasting blood sugar were analysed at Contact Laboratory Services (CLS).

vi. Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome

Metabolic syndrome was defined according to WHO criteria1; insulin resistance was defined as type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) or impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (> 100 mg/dl) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), plus two of the following:

  • Abdominal obesity (waist-to-hip (WHR) ratio > 0.9 in men or > 0.85 in women, or body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2.

  • Triglycerides 150 mg/dl or greater, and/or high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol < 40 mg/dl in men and < 50 mg/dl in women.

  • Hypertension; 140/90 mmHg or greater.

  • Microalbuminuria (urinary albumin secretion rate 20 µg/min or greater, or albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30 mg/g or greater).

Statistical analysis

All analyses were conducted using SPSS software for Windows, version 11.0J (SPSS, Chicago, USA) and STATA. P value of <0.05 was considered to denote statistical significance. Continuous data were reported as mean ± SEM. Results from the participants were compared between the two groups using Student's t-test. The χ2 statistic was used to compare means and proportions. Stata/MP 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) was used to analyse the association between MS and different assessments of BP. Multiple regression and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to determine the association between MS status and changes in peripheral BP, central BP, and ABPM. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. All models were also adjusted for all the assessments of PWV.

Results

Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the study population according to MS status using WHO criteria. Hypertension and diabetes were significantly higher in those with metabolic syndrome. Participants with MS were older than those without metabolic syndrome. Lifestyle factors, smoking, and alcohol intake were not significantly different between the two groups.

Table 1.

General characteristics of the study population according to MS status (WHO criteria)

value Total population Without MS With MS P
Number 668 588 80
Age
(years) 48.5±18.1 42.4±17.9 56.2±14.4
0.0200*
Female
(%) 61.7 59.7 76.2
0.0030*
Alcohol intake
(%) 19.3 18.9 22.5
0.2611
Smokers
(%) 16.6 17 � 13.8
0.2887
Hypertensive
(%) 45.7 40.6 82.5
<0.0001*
Diabetic
(%) 9.6 3.9 51.2
<0.0001*

MS- Metabolic syndrome

*

P value <0.05 depicts significant difference between those with and without MS

Table 2 shows haemodynamic characteristics of the study population according to MS status. The result revealed that SBP24, DBP24, SBPN, DBPN,SBPD, DBPD, SBPC, DBPC, DBPC were significantly higher in those with metabolic syndrome compared to those without metabolic syndrome. SBP24, 24-hoursystolic BP; SBPD, 24-hour diastolic BP; SBPN, night-time systolic BP; DBPN, night-time diastolic BP; SBPD,daytime systolic BP; DBPD, daytime diastolic BP; SBPC, conventional systolic BP; DBPC, conventional diastolic BP; C_SBP, centralsystolic BP; C_DBP, centraldiastolic BP. *p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. values expressed as mean ±standard deviation; p value < 0.05 considered significant.

Table 2.

Haemodynamic characteristics of the study population (mm Hg) according to MS status

Total population Without MS With MS P value
SBP24 662 117.1 ± 14.1 125.4
±17.8 <0.001*
DBP24 662 72.2 ± 9.6 76.0 ±
11.0 0.100
SBPN 662 110.4 ±16.2 119
±21.0 0.011*
DBPN 662 64 ± 11.2 68.6 ±
12.7 0.020 *
SBPD 662 121.3 ± 13.7 128.5 ±
16.4 0.001*
DBPD 662 77.1 ± 9.5 80.5 ±
10.6 0.170
SBPC 688 127.2 ± 20.9 140.1 ±
24.1 0.005*
DBPC 688 82.6 ±11.5 88.4
±14.9 0.001*
C_SBP 647 117.7 ±23.5 126.6
±22.6 0.002*
C_DBP 647 83.32 ± 12.9 87.5 ±
11.4 0.006*

Table 3 shows the association between MS and BP in the WHO category of MS. The result revealed that SBP24, DBP24, SBPN, DBPN, SBPD, DBPD, SBPC, and DBPC were significantly associated with PWV. CI, confidence intervals, SBPC- Conventional Systolic Blood Pressure, DBPC- Conventional Diastolic Blood Pressure, SBP 24 - 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure, DBP24 - 24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure, SBPD-Daytime Systolic Blood Pressure, DBPD- Daytime Diastolic Blood Pressure, SBPN - Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure, DBPN - Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure, PWV- pulse wave velocity, *means there was a significant p value when compared with metabolic syndrome category, p < 0.05. Values expressed as a percentage or mean ±standard deviation; p value < 0.05 considered significant.

Table 3.

The association between MS and BP (mm Hg) in the WHO

R2 CI
P value
PWV vs
SBP24 0.171 0.061 to 0.091
< 0.001*
DBP24 0.097 0.062 to 0.110
< 0.001*
SBPN 0.163 0.051 to 0.077
< 0.001*
DBPN 0.109 0.058 to 0.099
< 0.001*
SBPD 0.142 0.056 to 0.088
< 0.001*
DBPD 0.064 0.046 to 0.095
< 0.001*
SBPC 0.303 0.059 to 0.074

Table 4 shows the multivariate association between PWV and the indices of obesity. The analysis shows that the three indices of obesity (WC, BMI, and WHR) were significantly associated with PWV. PWV- Pulse waist velocity, WC- waist circumference, BMI-body mass index. Corrected for age, sex, smoking, and alcohol intake; CI, confidence intervals; values expressed as a mean ±standard deviation; p value < 0.05 considered significant.

Table 4.

Multivariate association between PWV and the indices of obesity

R2 CI
P value
PWV vs
WW (cm) 0.090 0.038 to 0.062
< 0.001*
BMI (kg/m2) 0.043
<0.001*
WHR 0.054 2.754 to 5.338
<0.001*

Discussion

Our study revealed a high prevalence of obesity (36.8%) among the study population [Fig. 1]. Metabolic syndrome (MS) was noticed to be common among female participants than male. Moreover, those with MS are significantly older than those without MS (Table 1). However, studies have shown that indices of obesity (WC, BMI, and WHR) and hypertension increase with increasing age4,14. Hence, the observed age-related increase in MS in this study (Fig. 2) was believed to be mediated by the indices of obesity and hypertension. Interestingly, two of the three indices (WC and BMI) and hypertension have been documented to be strongly related to insulin resistance4,15. Notably, the prevalence of diabetic participants in this study significantly increased among those with MS [Table 1].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

In the study population, 4% were underweight, 35.8% had normal weight, 23.4% and 36.8% were overweight and obese, respectively

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Showing the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) among the age groups in the study population

According to the 2021 USPSTF hypertension screening recommendation, hypertension is defined17 as blood pressure >= 130/80 mm Hg. Our result implies that, irrespective of the WHO definition of hypertension, MS may be diagnosed among apparently healthy people with normal BP and isolated systolic hypertension (Table 2). Isolated systolic hypertension means systolic BP increases despite normal diastolic BP. Studies have shown that this is more prevalent in older adults and related to arterial stiffness and MS18; there is are risk of atherosclerosis19,20. As earlier stated, most participants with MS are hypertensive (82.5%) and older than those without MS (Table 1). Furthermore, in this study, there was an association between PWV and the haemodynamic parameters (Table 2). Likewise, all the BP measurements significantly correlate with PWV (Table 3). This corroborates studies by Pietri et al., and Omboni et al, 2019, which observed increased peripheral wave reflections and endothelial dysfunction in untreated essential hypertensive patients and suggested that ambulatory pulse wave analysis may help evaluate vascular health of individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease21,22.

Variability in ethnicity, gender, and other related components of MS are interrelated factors to the development of AS23-25. These factors influence the interwoven mechanisms involved in the development/progression of AS regardless of the contributory factors24,25. Regarding the gender differences, a study in Korean men revealed an association between AS in men and no association AS in women based on flexibility25. In addition, relative risk factors such as alcohol and smoking are also associated with accelerated progression of arterial stiffening26. Our findings show that the two risk factors were not significantly different between those with or without MS. On the contrary, Wang et al. (2022) reported that active smoking is associated with increased prevalence of MS, especially among those less than 70 years27. Yu et al. (2014) also documented that smoking and alcohol contribute to an increase in the prevalence of MS in Chinese men only28. However, the main focus of our study is on the impact of pathological conditions on the pathogenesis of AS. Therefore, obesity, persistent hypertension, and MS revealed in our study most likely result to distending pressure in the large elastic-type arteries (aorta and carotid) are key determinants of the degenerative changes; thus, our results show that PWV is significantly higher in individuals with MS compared to those without MS (Fig 1). This could be further linked with the pressure wave generated by the left ventricle, which travels down the arterial tree and then reflected at multiple peripheral sites, mainly at resistance arteries (small muscular arteries and arterioles). Consequently, the pressure waveform recorded at any site of the arterial tree is the sum of the forward traveling waveform generated by left ventricular ejection and the backward traveling wave, the pattern of the incident wave reflected at peripheral sites30,31. If the large conduit arteries are healthy and stable, the reflected wave merges with the incident in the proximal aorta during diastole, thus, augmenting the diastolic BP and enhance coronary perfusion. In contrast, if the arteries are hardened, pulse wave velocity increases, accelerating the incident and reflected waves; thus, the reflected wave merges with the incident wave in systole and augments aortic systolic rather than diastolic pressure12,13,32. As a result, left ventricular afterload increases and normal ventricular relaxation and coronary filling are compromised. Apart from changes in the timing of the waveforms merging, changes in the magnitude of the reflected wave and central pressures may result from changes in the proportion of the incident wave that is reflected13. Hence, the association between all the indices of obesity and AS (Table 4) implies that prevention/treatment of obesity and hypertension in Blacks will reduce the prevalence of MS and attenuate the progression of arterial damage and its associated complications.

Conclusion

Obesity and hypertension are major components of MS emphasized by the WHO criteria; the two components are rampant among Africans. Our study observed that these two major factors remain important components in the determinants of the degenerative vascular changes among Africans. Therefore, interventions aimed at reducing the progression of arterial damage and associated complications should be targeted at the prevention and management of obesity and hypertension.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Shows the differences in PWV in the WHO category of MS. The PWV of participants with metabolic syndrome was significantly higher than participants without metabolic syndrome

Acknowledgements

All participants formed an integral part of this study, without whom the study would not have been realizable. We appreciate their voluntary contributions.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Authors' Contributions

Study concept and design; OAE, MJM; acquisition of data: EOA, KFN; Statistical analysis; AA and OAE interpretation of data: OAE; drafting of the manuscript: OAE; critical revision of the manuscript: and study supervision: MJM.

References

  • 1.Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the Metabolic Syndrome; A Joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640–1645. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kassi E, Pervanidou P, Kaltsas G, Chrousos G. Metabolic syndrome: definitions and controversies. BMC Medicine. 2011;9:48–57. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Duque AP, Rodrigues JLF, Mediano MFF, Tibiriça E, De Lorenzo A. Emerging concepts in metabolically healthy obesity. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;10(2):48–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fahed G, Aoun L, Bou Zerdan M, Allam S, Bou Zerdan M, Bouferraa Y, Assi HI. Metabolic Syndrome: Updates on Pathophysiology and Management in 2021. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;23(2):786–865. doi: 10.3390/ijms23020786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schillaci G, Pirro M, Vaudo G, Mannarino MR, Savarese G, Pucci G, et al. Metabolic syndrome is associated with aortic stiffness in untreated essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2005;45:1078–1082. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000165313.84007.7d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Touyz RM, Eluwole OA, Camargo LL, Rios FJ, Alves-Lopes R, Neves KB, et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying vascular disease in diabetes. In Blood Pressure Disorders in Diabetes Mellitus. Springer Nature. 2023;3(2):105–122. Eds. A. Berbari and G. Mancia. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schutte AE, Kruger R, Gafane-Matemane LF, Breet Y, Strauss-Kruger M, Cruickshank JK. Ethnicity and Arterial Stiffness. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2020;40:1044–1054. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.313133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Touyz RM, Rios FJ, Montezano AC, Neves KB, Eluwole OA, Maseko MJ, et al. Galis Z, editor. The vascular phenotype in hypertension. The Vasculome: From Many to One. 2022.
  • 9.Nemcsik J, Cseprekál O, Tislér A. Measurement of arterial stiffness: a novel tool of risk stratification in hypertension. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;956:475–488. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eluwole OA, Nkoana KF, Phukubje E, Ngema M, Maseko MJ. Left ventricular geometrical changes associated with metabolic syndrome in a population with high prevalence of obesity and hypertension (2022) Acta Scientific Nutritional Health Journal. 2017;2(4):10–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pereira T, Correia C, Cardoso J. Novel Methods for Pulse wave velocity measurement. Journal of Medical Biological Engineering. 2015;35(5):555–565. doi: 10.1007/s40846-015-0086-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shiburi CP, Staessen JA, Maseko M, Wojciechoska W, Thijs L, Van-Bortel LM, et al. Reference values for SphygmorCor measurements in South Africans of African ancestry. American Journal of Hypertension. 2006;19(1):40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Redelinghuys M, Norton GR, Scott L, Maseko MJ, Brooksbank R, Majane OH, et al. Relationship between urinary salt excretion and pulse pressure and central aortic hemodynamics independent of steady state pressure in the general population. Hypertension. 2010;56:584–590. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.156323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kruszyńska E, Łoboz-Rudnicka M, Palombo C, Vriz O, Kozakova M, Ołpińska B, Morizzo C, Łoboz-Grudzień K, Jaroch J. Carotid Artery Stiffness in Metabolic Syndrome: Sex Differences. Journal of Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity. 2020;13:3359–3369. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S262192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Razzouk L, Muntner P. Ethnic, gender, and age-related differences in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2009;11(2):127–132. doi: 10.1007/s11906-009-0023-8. doi: 10.1007/s11906-009-0023-8. PMID: 19278602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nagayama D, Watanabe Y, Yamaguchi T, Suzuki K, Saiki A, Fujishiro K, et al. Issue of waist circumference for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome regarding arterial stiffness: Possible utility of a body shape index in middle-aged nonobese Japanese urban residents receiving health screening. Obes. Facts. 2022;15:160–169. doi: 10.1159/000520418. doi: 10.1159/000520418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Starzak M, Stanek A, Jakubiak GK, Cholewka A, Cieslar G. Arterial Stiffness Assessment by Pulse Wave Velocity in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components: Is It a Useful Tool in Clinical Practice? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(16):10368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ferdinand KC, Brown Will the 2021 USPSTF Hypertension Screening Recommendation Decrease or Worsen Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Blood Pressure Control? JAMA Network Open. p. 3718. https://doi.org/10.1001amanetworkopen.2021.3718. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Tomiyama H, Shiina K, Nakano H, Iwasaki Y, Matsumoto C, Fujii M, et al. Arterial stiffness and pressure wave reflection in the development of isolated diastolic hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2020;38:2000–2007. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Majane OH, Woodiwiss AJ, Maseko MJ, Crowther NJ, Dessein PH, Norton GR. Impact of age on the independent association of adiposity with pulse-wave velocity in a population sample of African ancestry. Am J Hypertens. 2008;(8):936–942. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.203. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shen J, Poole JC, Topel ML, Bidulescu A, Morris AA, Patel RS, Binongo JG, Dunbar SB, Phillips L, Vaccarino V, Gibbons GH, Quyyumi AA. Subclinical Vascular Dysfunction Associated with Metabolic Syndrome in African Americans and Whites. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2005;100(11):4231–4239. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pietri P, Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Baou K, Xaplanteris P, Dima I, et al. Inflammatory status, arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. Artery Research. 2009;3(3):115–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Omboni S, Posokhov I, Parati G, Rogoza A, Kotovskaya Y, Arystan A, et al. VASOTENS Registry Study Group (2019), author Ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness web-based telemonitoring in patients at cardiovascular risk. First results of the VASOTENS (Vascular Health Assessment of the hypertensive patients) Registry. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) 2019;21(8):1155–1168. doi: 10.1111/jch.13623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang YM, Shin BC, Son C, Ha IH. An analysis of the associations between gender and metabolic syndrome components in Korean adults: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2019;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0393-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suliga E, Koziel D, Cielsla E, Rebak D, Gluszek-Osuch M, Gluszek S. Consumption of alcoholic beverages and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2764. doi: 10.3390/nu11112764. Doi:10.3390/nu11112764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yoo TK, Park SH, Park SJ, Lee JY. Impact of sex on the association between flexibility and arterial stiffness in older adults. Medicina. 2022;58:789. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060789. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lopes-Vicente WRP, Rodrigues S, Cepeda FX, Jordão CP, Costa-Hong V, Dutra-Marques ACB, et al. Arterial stiffness and its association with clustering of metabolic syndrome risk factors. Diabetol. Metab. Syndrome. 2017;9:87. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0286-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang J, Bai Y, Zeng Z, Wang J, Wang P, Zhao Y, et al. Association between life-course cigarette smoking and metabolic syndrome: a discovery-replication strategy. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2022;14:11. doi: 10.1186/s12098-022-00784-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yu M, Xu CX, Zhu HH, Hu RY, Zhang J, Wang H, et al. Associations of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption with metabolic syndrome in a male Chinese population: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Epidemiology. 2014;24(5):361–369. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20130112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Badhwar S, Chandran DS, Jaryal AK, Narang R, Deepak KK. Regional arterial stiffness in central and peripheral arteries is differentially related to endothelial dysfunction assessed by brachial flow-mediated dilation in metabolic syndrome. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research. 2018. pp. 106–113. doi: 10.1177/1479164117748840. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Yang YM, Shin BC, Son C, Ha IH. An analysis of the associations between gender and metabolic syndrome components in Korean adults: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2019;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0393-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ruiz HH, Ramasamy R, Schmidt AM. Advanced Glycation End Products: Building on the Concept of the “Common Soil” in Metabolic Disease. Endocrinology. 2020;161(1):bqz006. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqz006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Versari D, Daghini E, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Taddei S. Endothelial dysfunction as a target for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 2):314–321. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S330. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gong J, Xie Q, Han Y, Chen B, Li L, Zhou G, et al. Relationship between components of metabolic syndrome and arterial stiffness in Chinese hypertensives. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 2020;42:146–152. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2019.1590385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES