Abstract
Heterogeneous catalysis is pivotal to modern chemical industries, and molecular-level insights into catalytic processes are essential for developing highly efficient catalysts and advancing energy conversion technologies. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS), which integrates scanning probe microscopy with plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, provides chemical and topographic information simultaneously with exceptional sensitivity and nanoscale spatial resolution. This technique is ideally suited for the nanoscale chemical characterization of solid catalysts, enabling direct structure–performance correlations. In this review, we first introduce the fundamental principles of TERS, and then highlight its key applications in probing heterogeneous catalysis, focusing on critical aspects such as active sites, molecular activation pathways, conversion efficiency, chemical selectivity, and operando studies. We conclude by discussing current challenges and potential strategies to advance TERS in heterogeneous catalysis, and by outlining future directions for the field.
Keywords: heterogeneous catalysis, tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, active sites, chemical selectivity, operando studies, activation pathway, electrocatalysis, spatial resolution


1. Introduction
Heterogeneous catalysis lies at the core of the modern chemical industry and has driven many technological advancements with the aim of making a more sustainable society. − To date, heterogeneous catalysis has been widely used in numerous fields, including petrochemical refinement, pharmaceutical manufacture, environmental protection, and fine chemical synthesis. − In heterogeneous catalysis, solid catalysts such as supported or unsupported metal catalysts, − zeolites, , and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), are extensively used and play key roles in achieving high catalytic activity and selectivity. Solid catalysts react with molecules in the liquid or gas phase during catalytic processes. Various highly dynamic processes in time and space may occur at the interface between the surface of the catalysts and the reactants, including submonolayer molecular adsorption, diffusion, electron transfer (generation of intermediates), and desorption of products on the catalyst surface. In the above processes, all the molecular species near the catalysts’ surface form the complex interfacial region. Understanding the physicochemical properties of these interfacial processes is crucial in controlling the catalytic activity and selectivity. The morphology and electronic structure of the solid catalysts inherently determine their catalytic performance. For example, local structures, including step edges, corners, kinks, adatoms, and defects, are often considered highly active sites where charge transfer between the molecules and substrates usually occurs. , In addition, surface reconstruction and relaxation of solid catalysts may occur during catalysis. Therefore, it is necessary to establish the relationship between the topographic and electronic structure of solid catalysts and their chemical performance at the molecular to atomic level, which allows for the improvement of the rational design of highly efficient and selective catalysts. −
A complete understanding of the interfacial processes during heterogeneous catalysis calls for techniques that can provide information about the surface with a molecular fingerprint and nanometer-scale spatial resolution. With the development of surface science, various analytical tools have been employed to characterize the surface structure and properties of solid catalysts. Techniques include in situ electron microscopy, scanning probe microscopy (SPM), such as atomic force microscopy (AFM) , and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), , X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), , X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electrochemical cell microscopy (SECCM), − surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), and TERS. In situ electron microscopy, especially in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM), has been developed for studying the structural evolution of solid materials during catalytic reactions in liquid. − Similarly, SPM can provide surface morphology and electronic structure at the atomic resolution under various measurement conditions. , However, these methods provide limited chemical information on the surface of catalysts. Recently, X-ray microscopies, such as ambient pressure XPS and XAS, have shown great potential in revealing the chemical composition and the electronic structure of the surfaces as well as the surface species. , Nevertheless, the in situ studies of X-ray microscopies in liquid are still challenging, for which purpose an in situ reactor is required. Among these techniques, TERS stands out for its ability to simultaneously provide geometric and chemical information on the surface of catalysts at the nanoscale, and for its easy implementation under various conditions, including ultrahigh vacuum, air, and liquid (under electrochemical control).
Raman spectroscopy provides chemical fingerprint information on molecules. , However, the small Raman cross-section of molecules usually renders this method unsuitable for studying monolayers. Another bottleneck is the spatial resolution, which is restricted by the diffraction limit. TERS was first demonstrated in 2000 − and has rapidly developed into a powerful tool for the chemical analysis of surfaces over the past two decades. − TERS couples SPM with plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and thus combines subnanometer spatial resolution (under ultrahigh vacuum and cryogenic conditions) with single molecule sensitivity. In this method, a Ag or Au tip with a radius of approximately 20 nm is commonly used as a probe. The plasmonic tip is brought onto the sample surface with a distance below 1 nm using the feedback loop of the SPM. Under the resonant illumination of the tip apex with a laser, plasmons induced at the gap between the tip and the substrate result in a highly localized electromagnetic field, which enhances the Raman signal of the molecules under the tip. Due to the strong localization of the enhanced electromagnetic field at the tip apex, TERS can probe the topographic and chemical structure of the sample with a spatial resolution of approximately 2–3 nm at ambient conditions. − Under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) and cryogenic conditions, TERS can even achieve spatial resolution down to the Angstrom level, − which is rationalized by the ultimate confinement of light at the plasmonic picocavity in the junction. − This ability allows for a direct correlation between the specific surface structure and the catalytic performance in a label-free and nondestructive way, revealing catalyst–molecule interactions during heterogeneous catalysis. Furthermore, TERS can be effectively implemented in ambient, liquid, or even electrochemical environments, which makes it a feasible tool for operando monitoring of catalytic reactions. −
This review summarizes recent advances in the application of TERS for heterogeneous catalysis and highlights some key studies where TERS has been employed to probe the model catalysts, focusing on critical aspects such as active sites, molecular activation pathways, conversion efficiency, chemical selectivity, and operando studies. We then provide a detailed discussion on mechanistic insights into catalysis revealed by TERS across various model systems. Finally, we outline current challenges and potential strategies for advancing TERS studies in heterogeneous catalysis, concluding with future directions for developing TERS in this field.
2. Critical Insights into Catalytic Reactions
2.1. Active Sites
Studying the physicochemical properties of surface active sites of catalysts at the molecular level can provide valuable insights into the relationship between the structures of catalysts and their catalytic performance. In heterogeneous catalysis, the solid catalyst provides the surface sites for the adsorption and reaction of molecules, along with the generation of intermediates and desorption of products. Some minor surface sites, including step edges, defects, and perimetrical interfaces of various catalytic materials, are often highly active in heterogeneous catalysis. It is still challenging to visualize active sites with nanoscale spatial resolution under catalytically relevant conditions. Recently, TERS has been applied to monitor the catalytic activities of different surface sites of model catalysts. TERS is ideally suited for this work, as it offers high spatial resolution down to a few nm under ambient conditions, making it highly effective for revealing surface active sites.
In 2015, Kumar et al. reported the first TERS study of the catalytically active sites of a Ag substrate for the plasmon-induced reactions of para-aminothiophenol (pATP) to p,p′-dimercaptoazobenzene (DMAB). An aluminum-coated AFM tip was employed to enhance the Raman signal, meanwhile, the direct photocatalytic reactions at the tip apex were blocked. TERS maps reveal that the photocatalytic reactions only occurred at certain locations of the Ag substrate, evidenced by the distribution of the Raman peaks of DMAB. The catalytically active and inactive sites were mapped with a spatial resolution of 20 nm. Due to the complicated catalyst structure, it is still challenging to establish a full understanding of the catalytic processes. To simplify the geometric structure of solid catalysts, the Ren group fabricated a well-defined bimetallic model catalyst using underpotential deposition (UPD). In this way, they prepared a submonolayer of Pd on a Au(111) surface. The phenyl isocyanide (PIC) molecule was used as a probe molecule because its NC triple bond can directly interact with the surface and is sensitive to the electronic property of the surface, which allows us to distinguish different local structures of catalysts. TERS results showed that the NC vibrational peak gradually decreased and the peak at 1590 cm–1 significantly broadened on Au(111), while these changes were not observed on the Pd surface. This indicates that PIC is oxidized to phenyl isocyanate on Au(111), but surprisingly not on the Pd surface. Further, TERS line scans across a Pd–Au–Pd area showed a stronger TERS signal of PIC due to a stronger electromagnetic field located at the Pd step edges, with 3 nm spatial resolution (Figure a,b). Moreover, a lower frequency band at 1933 cm–1 was observed at the Pd step edge (Figure c), which is attributed to the weakened vibration of the NC triple bond of PIC molecules adsorbed. This result suggests an enhanced oxidation reactivity of PIC molecules at the Pd step edge compared to the Pd terrace, due to the d-band shift of the low-coordinated Pd step edge atoms to higher energy. Step edges of the Pd surface possess higher activity than the terrace. This is the first report to probe the oxidation of PIC molecules on metal surfaces using ambient TERS, achieving an exceptionally high spatial resolution of ∼3 nm. The authors effectively show the temporal evolution of TERS spectra for PIC on both Au and Pd. However, a missing element is deeper insight into the reaction dynamics at the Pd/Au step edges, likely due to the sluggish oxidation rate at these specific sites. Likewise, the Zenobi group demonstrated a higher trans-to-cis photoisomerization efficiency of azobenzenethiol at the Au step edges than that on the Au terraces. DFT suggests that it is also ascribed to the shift of d-bands to higher energy and the lower reaction enthalpy of trans-to-cis isomerization at Au steps. Additionally, the Kurouski group found that the step edges and corners of Pd on Au bimetallic nanoplates are the active sites for the Pd-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyuara reaction, rather than the Pd terrace, demonstrated with cargo-TERS. These studies demonstrate that step edges and corners, due to their distinct electronic structures, exhibit stronger catalytic activity than terraces, which is a consensus in heterogeneous catalysis. For the plasmon-induced dimerization of 4-bromothiophenol on nickel-decorated Au nanoplates, they discovered that it primarily occurred on Ni nanoislands rather than the surrounding Au, which demonstrated that Ni islands served as active sites during the catalytic reaction.
1.

Relationship between the catalyst structure and catalytic activity. (a) STM image of the Pd submonolayer on a Au(111) surface with adsorbed PIC, showing a gold hole in the middle. (b) Top three panels: plots of intensities of the three main TERS peaks (1165, 1590, and 1995 cm–1) as a function of the tip position. Error bars indicate the standard deviation for the three measurements. Bottom panel: Height profile of the surface along the dashed line in (a) superimposed with the atomic model of the surface atoms. The adsorbed PIC molecules on the surface are not included in the model. (c) Line-scan TERS spectra (from bottom to top) across a Pd terrace-Pd step edge-Au terrace region. Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2017 Springer Nature. (d) Atomic model of a Pt nanoisland on Au(111) shown in (e). Yellow, Au; white, first-layer Pt; red, blue, purple, and dark yellow, second-layer Pt. (e) STM image of the Pt nanoisland on the Au(111) surface. (f) TER spectra acquired along the red solid line in (e). (g) Representative TER spectra of the v NC peak of CPI adsorbed at different atomic sites of Pt. Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2018 John Wiley and Sons.
The local electronic property of solid catalysts, such as the coordination environment, can efficiently tune the interfacial metal/molecule electronic structure and thus the charge transfer kinetics. Su et al. fabricated Pt nanoislands on Au(111) through UPD of Cu on a Au(111) surface, followed by galvanic replacement of Pt. 4-Chlorophenyl isocyanide (CPI) was used as a probe molecule. In Figure d–g, a clear shift of the NC vibrations of CPI is observed when the tip crosses over the Pt terrace to the step edge, and to the kink. DFT confirms that a lower coordination number at the step edge and kink than that on the Pt terrace leads to a higher d-band center, resulting in stronger metal/molecule interaction and thus the shift of the NC peak of CPI molecules to a higher vibrational frequency. This work is strong evidence that TERS is well suited for the in situ studies of the various surface sites and their catalytic properties of solid catalysts.
Furthermore, the distribution of active sites plays a key role in determining the local catalytic performance of catalysts. Ex situ TERS studies provide a straightforward and efficient approach to observe the molecular changes after catalytic reactions, which can offer direct evidence for the identification of catalytically active sites. The hydrogen spillover depicts the dynamic migration of surface adsorbed hydrogen species from hydrogen-rich sites to hydrogen-poor sites, which is an important effect in H-involving reactions. Unveiling how hydrogen transfers on the surface of solid catalysts is essential for enhancing the catalytic performance of H-involving reactions, which is, however, hampered due to the structural complexity of powder catalysts, especially for oxide catalysts. Recently, Yin et al. employed TERS to study the spatial distribution of active hydrogen atoms and their catalytic activities, thereby elucidating the structure–reactivity relationship on the surface of Pd/Au bimetallic model catalysts. The hydrogenation of chloronitrobenzenethiol (CNBT) was used as the model system, utilizing the catalytic reduction of CNBT to chloroaminobenzenethiol (CABT) in the presence of hydrogen to identify the catalyst’s active sites (Figure a). TERS maps demonstrated that CNBT is selectively hydrogenated to CABT on the Pd surface, revealing a clear correlation between the location of the Pd area and the spatial distribution of CABT in Figure b. Moreover, a slight discrepancy between the spatial distribution of CABT and Pd was observed. The TERS intensity of the NO2 vibrational peak at 1336 cm–1 even decreases in the Au crater, indicating the reduction of the nitro group of CNBT on Au. By calculating the adsorption energy of species on Pd and Au, they concluded that this discrepancy is attributed to hydrogen spillover, where hydrogen molecules dissociate on Pd initially and then hydrogen atoms diffuse to the adjacent Au surface, facilitating the reduction of CNBT on Au. To gain a further understanding of the hydrogenation process of CNBT, a quantitative characterization of the relationship between the active sites (blue region in Figure c) and surface structure was conducted. The colocalized STM image with the height profile is also given (Figure d), showing a Pd island on a Au surface. For the Au surface with low Pd coverage, the size of the active region is approximately 50 nm, while the size of the Pd island is only 20 nm. With more TERS results, they found that the reactive regions are ∼15–30 nm larger than the Pd areas, indicating that hydrogenation occurs beyond the Pd active sites and onto the Au areas. This work investigated the hydrogenation of the CNBT self-assembled layer on Pd/Au bimetallic model catalysts using TERS with approximately ∼10 nm chemical spatial resolution, enabling the visualization of catalytically active sites. Since the hydrogenation products on Pd and Au are identical, it is difficult to visually track the hydrogen spillover. A better model reaction would yield distinct products at different sites, for example, hydrogenation on Pd and dehalogenation on Au (within the spillover region). This would allow the spillover region to be easily identified in TERS maps by locating the dehalogenation products.
2.
Catalytically active sites and the diffusion range of reactive species revealed by TERS. (a) Scheme of the selective catalytic hydrogenation of a CNBT self-assembled monolayer (SAM) on a Pd/Au bimetallic surface. (b) First panel: STM image of CNBT SAM on submonolayer Pd on Au(111) after exposure to H2, showing a Au crater on the Pd surface. Second panel: the normalized TERS map of the peak at 1336 cm–1 (NO2 stretching mode) of CNBT SAM on high coverage Pd on Au(111) after exposure to H2, colocalized with the STM image in the first panel of b. Third panel: Cubic spline interpolation of the TERS map shown in the second panel of b. Fourth panel: atomic model of a Au crater on the Pd surface. (c) Plot of the TERS intensity of the peak at 1336 cm–1 in Raman spectra in TERS line scan spectra on low Pd coverage on Au(111) after exposure to H2 as a function of the tip position. The size of the active region defined by the peak width of the fitted curve (red solid line) is represented by the dark blue region. Blue arrows accompanied by dots indicate the hydrogen spillover direction. (d) Height profile (red line) of the surface along the dashed line of the inset of the corresponding STM images, superimposed with a schematic of the surface structure in (d). Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2020 Springer Nature. (e) STM image of a PBT SAM on a Pd/Au(111) bimetallic surface after reaction in 30% H2O2 aqueous solution. (f) Height profile (top panel) along the blue solid line in (e) and TERS intensity profile (bottom panel, red circle) along the red solid line in (g). (g) Corresponding 1607 cm–1 TERS peak map recorded simultaneously with the STM image in (e), using the intensity of the peak at 1607 cm–1. (h) Schematic illustration of the diffusion of OH radicals generated at Pd step edge active sites on a Pd/Au(111) bimetallic surface. (i) Waterfall plots of all TER spectra from a TERS line scan. Step size: 1 nm. The vertical dashed line indicates the position of the Pd step edge. (j) TERS intensity profiles (blue dots) of the 1607 cm–1 peak in (i) fitted with a Gaussian function (blue line). The spatial distribution of the number of unreacted PBT molecules obtained by deconvolution (red dashed curve). The diffusion-induced distribution of the probability of OH radicals (green dashed curve). Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Similarly, Su et al. applied TERS to investigate the local generation and diffusion of active oxygen species (AOS) on a Pd/Au bimetallic model catalyst. They used 4′-(pyridin-4-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)-methanethiol (PBT) as a Raman marker. TERS maps revealed that PBT underwent oxidative degradation by AOS which is generated on the Pd surface after immersion in 30% H2O2 solution for 30 min, resulting in the disappearance of PBT Raman signal (Figure e–g). They discovered that H2O2 can only be activated to generate highly active OH radicals on the Pd surface but not on the Au surface. These OH radicals subsequently destroyed the adsorption capacity of PBT on the metal surface, reducing the Raman signal intensity of PBT on the catalyst surface. However, TERS maps showed that the size of the area with a positive PBT signal was around 9 nm smaller than that of the Au-hole region, indicating that OH radicals diffuse to the adjacent Au area upon generation. To distinguish the activity between different Pd sites, the reaction was conducted under mild conditions (immersion in 15% H2O2 solution for 2 min). It is found that PBT signals near the Pd step regions decreased, while the TERS intensity of PBT at the Pd terrace remained comparatively strong, similar to that observed on the Au(111) surface (Figure h–i). This indicated that the Pd step edge is more active than the Pd terrace in generating AOS. Gaussian function deconvolution of the TERS signal of PBT at the Pd/Au interface indicated that the OH radical diffusion length at the Pd step edge was approximately 5.4 nm (Figure j). These results provide valuable insights into the spatial distribution of the active sites in AOS-induced catalytic reactions promoted by Pd and demonstrate the spillover of AOS.
2.2. Molecular Activation Pathway
Gaining insight into the molecular activation pathway at the nanoscale to unveil catalytic mechanisms is crucial for developing highly efficient catalysts. The challenge of distinguishing individual molecules and their interaction with metal surfaces can be overcome by employing analytical techniques with ultrahigh spatial resolution, such as STM and TERS, to achieve molecular-level imaging of surfaces. Compared with STM, TERS has an inherent advantage as it provides the chemical information on the surface simultaneously with the topography. Thus, it has been widely applied to study the chemical reaction processes of surface molecules, such as coupling, ,, decomposition, ,, and oxidation. −
Recently, TERS was employed to investigate the oxidation of ordered and disordered pATP monolayers on Au by oxygen and elucidate the oxygen activation pathway on gold surfaces (Figure a). To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the oxidation of the ordered and disordered pATP on Au, a quantitative analysis of the conversion efficiency of pATP to p-nitrothiophenol (pNTP) after exposure to oxygen was performed. In Figure d,e, TERS intensity maps of the NO2 group demonstrate that the disordered pATP monolayer on Au shows a higher reaction efficiency compared to that on the ordered SAM sample (Figure b,c), after exposure to O2. Direct oxidation of pATP adlayers in H2O2 solution affirms that the oxidation of pATP molecules proceeds via interaction with on-surface oxidative species. When pATP molecules were arranged in an ordered phase on the gold surface, spatial constraints limited their interaction with reactive oxygen species, inhibiting the oxidation reaction. The detailed activation pathway of O2 on Au surfaces was further demonstrated by the isotope labeling method. The observed 3 cm–1 red shift of the NO2 Raman peak during pATP oxidation with H2 18O (Figure d) is unexpectedly small. Isotope labeling with 18O typically produces shifts of an order of magnitude larger (tens of cm–1). − The minimal shift here indicates that only a tiny amount of the N18O2 group is formed, implying that oxygen activation via interfacial water on the Au surface is a limited process. Nevertheless, this result provides empirical evidence for the generation of active oxidative species, such as hydroperoxyl radicals, atomic oxygen, and hydroxyl radicals (Figure e), on the Au(111) surface through a water-promoted O2 activation mechanism. This study reveals the role of water in promoting oxygen activation using TERS, promoting the fundamental understanding of oxygen activation mechanisms on gold surfaces. These findings provide strong support for the application of TERS in elucidating molecular activation pathways on catalytic surfaces. Despite this advance, what is missing in the report is to provide the spectroscopic evidence of these active oxidative species induced by O2 and interfacial water using TERS, which will help gain deep insights into the molecular activation process on metal substrates.
3.
Insights into molecular activation pathways at the nanoscale via TERS. (a) Schematic of studying the oxidation of the ordered and disordered pATP on Au using STM-TERS. (b,c) Top panels: TERS intensity (1335 cm–1 peak) maps of the ordered (b) and disordered (c) pATP samples after O2 treatment. Bottom panels: the corresponding atomic models for illustration. (d) The average TERS spectra of the H2 18O-treated pATP adlayer and the pATP adlayer without H2 18O treatment after O2 exposure. (e) Schematic illustrating the theoretically proposed water-promoted mechanism of O2 activation on Au(111) surface. Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2024 John Wiley and Sons.
2.3. Conversion Efficiency
Conversion efficiency of catalysts is one of the important parameters to evaluate the chemical performance of the solid catalysts, which is determined by various factors, including the composition of catalysts, the orientation of adsorbed molecules, and the reaction time. Taking advantage of the high sensitivity of TERS, one can (sub)quantitatively evaluate the conversion efficiency of solid catalysts in catalytic reactions. TERS combined with theoretical calculations provides fundamental aspects in catalysis to unravel the underlying catalytic mechanism.
Plasmon-driven photocatalytic coupling reactions, particularly the oxidation of pATP and the reduction of pNTP to form DMAB, have emerged as prominent model systems in the SERS and TERS fields due to their utility in studying photocatalytic mechanisms and plasmonic enhancement effects. In 2012, van Schrojenstein Lantman et al. pioneered the study of TERS to investigate the photocatalytic coupling reaction of pNTP to form DMAB on a gold substrate. The study employed a dual-wavelength laser strategy: a 532 nm (green) laser triggered the photocatalytic coupling reaction of pATP, while a 633 nm (red) laser monitored its progression in real time, because the coupling process was selectively activated by green light. This approach enabled the direct observation of the reaction kinetics of pNTP dimerization at the nanoscale. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that the reaction rate was significantly influenced by the surface coverage of pNTP, with partially covered regions exhibiting a faster reaction rate compared to fully covered monolayers. Recently, the Kurouski group investigated this catalytic reaction on tungsten disulfide (WS2) nanoplates supported on a Si substrate. They found that the catalytic activity was significantly enhanced when the WS2 nanoplates were functionalized with Pd nanoparticles. This study highlights the potential of coupling catalytic metals with transition metal dichalcogenides to enhance their catalytic performance. However, coupling two-dimensional materials with metal nanoparticles yields a complex with complicated structure, making it difficult to disentangle the catalytic mechanisms on the complex. Beyond surface coverage, the molecular orientation of pNTP on gold surfaces also plays a crucial role in determining the reaction rate. Cai et al. employed TERS mapping to investigate the impact of ordered and disordered molecular arrangements on the dimerization of pNTP to form DMAB (Figure a). To this end, two different sample preparation methods were used. The ordered pNTP SAM was prepared by immersing the Au substrate in a pNTP solution overnight. This method resulted in well-organized molecular domains with sizes of tens of nanometers, as shown in Figure b. In contrast, the disordered pNTP sample was fabricated via drop-casting of pNTP onto Au. This rapid deposition method produced only sparse molecular domains with sizes of a few nanometers, as observed in Figure c. The TERS peaks at 1146, 1390, and 1442 cm–1 (corresponding to DMAB vibrational modes) exhibit significantly stronger intensities in the disordered pNTP samples compared to the ordered SAMs (Figure d,e). The enhanced signal suggests that the varied molecular orientations of pNTP in disordered configurations promote a higher conversion efficiency for pNTP dimerization into DMAB. DFT calculations further demonstrated that in the disordered sample, pNTP molecules exhibit greater orientational flexibility, resulting in a lower reaction energy barrier. Similarly, the Ren group found that the plasmon-induced dimerization of pATP on Au(111) and on Ag(111) is highly dependent on the adsorbed molecular orientations. In Figure f, the Raman peaks of DMAB appeared in the TERS spectrum of pATP SAM on Au(111) following 5 s irradiation of a 633 nm laser. In contrast, no DMAB Raman peaks were detected in the TERS spectrum of pATP SAM on Ag(111) even after 10 min of irradiation with the same wavelength (Figure g). DFT simulations revealed that the most stable configuration of pATP on Au(111) occurred with the molecular axis tilted 31° relative to the normal surface (Figure h), while the tilt angle of pATP on Ag(111) corresponding to its optimized configuration was only 16°. This suggests that pATP molecules adopt a more vertical orientation on Ag(111), thereby inhibiting their dimerization. Furthermore, the authors demonstrated that pATP coupling reactions could occur on polycrystalline Ag substrates, confirming that molecular orientation variations facilitate this reaction. Notably, the coupling reaction of pATP is also dependent on the metal substrates, for example, it can take place on Au(111) but not on Au(100). By correlating molecular orientation with reactivity, both studies independently demonstrated that adsorption geometry is a critical factor controlling the efficiency of plasmon-driven catalytic reactions.
4.
Correlation between conversion efficiency and molecular orientation on the surface. (a) Schematic of the TERS measurement of ordered and disordered pNTP to form DMAB on a Au surface. (b,c). STM images of the pNTP adlayers on Au prepared via immersion (b) and drop-cast protocols (c). (d,e) Average TERS spectra of pNTP-functionalized (d) TS-Au and (e) Au(111) surfaces prepared via drop-cast (blue trace) or immersion (red trace) protocols and the confocal Raman spectrum of pNTP powders (black trace). Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society. (f,g) Top panels: STM images of pATP adlayers on a Au(111) surface (f) and a Ag(111) plate (g). Bottom panels: The corresponding profiles along the white dashed lines indicated on the top panels of Figure f,g. (h,i) TERS spectra acquired on pATP SAMs on Au(111) (h) and Ag(111) (i) substrates marked with the white dots in the top panels of Figure f,g. The black spectra were collected before the laser irradiation. The red spectrum in Figure h and the gray spectrum in Figure i were collected after 5 s (h) and 10 min (i) of laser irradiation, respectively. (j,k) Atomic models illustrating the optimized molecular arrangements of pATP on Au(111) (j) and Ag(111) (k). Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
2.4. Chemical Selectivity
Chemical selectivity in heterogeneous catalysis is a cornerstone of catalytic performance and is inherently linked to the catalyst’s microstructure dictating reactant adsorption, activation, and reaction pathways. TERS offers transformative insights into these phenomena by combining ultrahigh spatial resolution and single-molecule sensitivity. These capabilities allow TERS to probe catalytic selectivity at the single-bond level, resolving localized chemical interactions and transient intermediates that are otherwise obscured in the ensemble-averaged techniques. In heterogeneous catalysis, chemical selectivity refers to the ability of a catalyst to direct a chemical reaction toward a specific desired product(s) over other thermodynamically feasible products. Selective chemical bond activation (bond selectivity within a single molecule) is a crucial manifestation of reaction selectivity. We will use a few recent studies, including selective bond breaking within a single molecule directed either by plasmon or by voltage pulses in STM, and selective product formation controlled by metals (reaction selectivity), to exemplify the chemical selectivity studied by TERS.
Although chemical reactions assisted by surface plasmons have been extensively studied in the past decades, the precise control of localized plasmons to activate a specific moiety of a molecule, in the presence of multiple chemically equivalent parts within a single molecule, is extremely challenging due to the relatively large lateral distribution of the plasmonic field. In a recent study, Mahapatra et al. demonstrated the selective activation of a C–Si bond in individual 5, 10, 15, 20-(tetra-trimethylsilylethynyl) porphyrin (TMSEP) molecules on Cu(100). Under UHV and cryogenic conditions, they combined STM with light irradiation to achieve this with single-bond precision (Figure a,b). Atomic-scale confinement of the localized surface plasmon, which was achieved by holding the STM tip within a subnanometer proximity to the target molecule for several seconds under laser excitation, facilitated the selective bond breaking. The authors demonstrated the sequential cleavage of the three C–Si bonds within a single TMSEP molecule, leading to the formation of carbon radicals presenting a different height contrast in STM images (Figure c–f). The resultant carbon radical intermediates exhibited characteristic topographic variations in STM imaging, manifesting as distinct height contrast features that provided direct spatial evidence of the bond-breaking sequence. This work is among the few to successfully demonstrate plasmon-induced chemistry at the single-bond level.
5.
Chemical selectivity at the single bond level. (a) Simplified scheme of the C–Si bond breaking. (b) Schematic of the plasmon-assisted site-selective activation of a single TMSEP molecule on Cu(100) in the STM nanojunction by a Ag tip under the illumination of a 532 nm laser. (c–f) Consecutive C–Si bond dissociations within a TMSEP molecule. Top panel: STM image of TMSEP with 4 lobes (c), 3 lobes (d), 2 lobes (e), and 1 lobe (f), respectively. Bottom panel: a corresponding ball-and-stick model of the molecule. Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society. (g) TER spectra obtained at the middle and end sites indicated by the crosses on the pentacene species of α, β, and γ in panel h. Excitation source: 532 nm with an intensity of 0.2 mW. Exposure time: 5 s. The spectra are vertically shifted for clarity. (h) STM images of the pentacene species of α, β, and γ. The transformed species (β, and γ) were achieved by voltage pulses. Tunneling conditions: V = 0.1 V and I = 8 nA. (i). TERS maps of the C–H stretching mode of the pentacene species α, β, and γ. (j). Simulated Raman maps of the C–H stretching mode of the three pentacene species. Red arrows indicate the C–H bond breaking at the central benzene ring in β and γ. Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2021 American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Similarly, Xu et al. utilized a combined STM, AFM, and TERS to characterize the structure of individual pentacene molecules on Ag(100) under UHV and cryogenic conditions. They found that pentacene molecules (intact, α) can be selectively transformed to derivatives (β and γ) through the specific C–H bond breaking driven by the pulsed voltage or more possibly by tip-induced nanocavity plasmons, which is deduced by the same voltage threshold for both pathways at 1.5–1.6 V (Figure h). For the detailed mechanism of the bond breaking, the readers are referred to the ref . TERS was employed to unravel the chemical structure of the three species. Figure g shows the TER spectra taken from the species α, β, and γ when the tip was located around the middle and end sites of the molecules. For species α and β, the Raman peak at around 2850 cm–1 corresponding to the C–H stretching mode is visible when the tip is placed in the middle of the molecule, while for species γ, this peak completely disappears. Furthermore, TERS mapping shows the spatial distribution of the C–H vibrational mode, as confirmed by DFT simulations (Figure i,j). The structure of the three species was also investigated by AFM imaging. The combined STM-AFM-TERS strategy enabled the unambiguous correlation between the structure and chemical heterogeneities of the three pentacene-derivative species obtained by the specific C–H bond breaking, which demonstrated the precise control of single bond selectivity at the atomic level.
Bimetallic nanostructures composed of plasmonic and catalytic metals exhibit unique catalytic reactivity and selectivity in heterogeneous catalysis, especially in plasmon-driven reactions. Recently, the Kurouski group used TERS mapping to investigate the plasmon-induced redox chemistry of 4-mercaptophenylmethanol (MPM) and 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (MBA) on gold–platinum bimetallic nanoplates (Au@PtNPs), gold–palladium bimetallic nanoplates (Au@PdNPs), and their monometallic counterparts, gold nanoplates (AuNPs). TERS mapping revealed distinct catalytic behaviors for MPM on Au@PtNPs and MBA on Au@PdNPs. On Au@PtNPs, a new peak at 1714 cm–1 (assigned to the CO vibrations) appeared predominantly in the spectra from the edges of the nanoplates (Figure b–e), confirming the plasmon-driven oxidation of MPM to MBA at these sites. No evidence of the reverse reaction (MBA reduction to MPM) was observed on Au@PtNPs, indicating that the oxidation was exclusive to the edges of Au@PtNPs (Figure a). In contrast, Au@PdNPs facilitated only the plasmon-driven reduction of MBA to MPM, as shown in TERS maps (Figure f–h). These results highlight that the reactivity and selectivity of bimetallic nanoplates depend critically on the catalytic metal. Kinetic studies further revealed that the reduction rate on Au@PdNPs exceeded the oxidation rate on Au@PtNPs. Notably, monometallic AuNPs exhibited different selectivity: both MPM and MBA were converted to thiophenol (TP) (Figure i–m), underscoring the unique catalytic properties of bimetallic systems. Their findings suggest that while the rectified electric field likely serves as the driving force, the catalytic metal ultimately governs the selectivity. In other words, the properties of the catalytic metal inherently determine the catalytic pathway and products of these plasmon-driven reactions.
6.
Reaction selectivity revealed by TERS mapping. (a) Schematic of the plasmon-driven oxidation of MPM to MBA on Au@PtNPs. (b,c) Typical TERS spectra extracted from the TERS maps of MPM SAM on Au@PtNPs (d,e) showing the presence of MPM (blue, b) and MBA (green, c). (d,e) TERS peak intensity maps (1593 cm–1, (d); 1714 cm–1, (e) of MPM SAM on Au@PtNPs. Step size: 10 nm. (f). Schematic of the plasmon-driven reduction of MBA to MPM on Au@PdNPs. (g,h) TERS peak intensity maps (1570–1750 cm–1 containing the CC and CO vibrations of MBA, g; 1593 cm–1 corresponding to the CC vibrations of MPM, (h) of MBA SAM on Au@PdNPs. Step size: 10 nm. (i) Schematic of the C–C cleavage in MBA and MPM that leads to the formation of TP on AuNPs. (j,k) Typical TERS spectra extracted from the TERS maps of MPM SAM on AuNPs showing the presence of MPM (blue, j) and TP (red, k). (l,m) Typical TERS spectra extracted from the TERS maps of MBA SAM on AuNPs showing the presence of MBA (blue, j) and TP (red, k). Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
The same group further explored plasmon-driven catalytic selectivity using mono- and bimetallic nanostructures for the redox chemistry of pATP and pNTP. , Their earlier work demonstrated that on Au@PtNPs, pATP underwent stepwise oxidation, namely first to pNTP and then to DMAB. On AuMPs, however, pATP was oxidized directly to DMAB without any detectable intermediates. Conversely, Au@PdMPs catalyzed the reduction of pNTP to both pATP and DMAB, while AuMPs produced only DMAB from pNTP. These results underscore how metal composition starkly dictates reaction pathways and selectivity. However, the fundamental mechanism by which catalytic metals, such as Pt and Pd, govern this selectivity requires deeper investigation. Future work should focus on the underlying factors, such as the adsorption geometry of reactants on different metal surfaces, as discussed previously, to elucidate the precise role of the catalytic metal in regulating these selective pathways.
2.5. Operando Studies
One of the primary goals of operando studies in heterogeneous catalysis is to establish an intrinsic correlation between the surface structure of catalysts under reaction conditions and their corresponding catalytic performance, including activity, selectivity, deactivation, and poisoning resistance. To achieve this, it is essential to simultaneously monitor the structure of catalysts and the formation of products in situ. As mentioned above, TERS is compatible with measurements performed in liquid under electrochemical control, known as electrochemical TERS (EC-TERS). − EC-TERS enables the in situ identification of catalytically active sites at the nanometer scale during electrocatalytic reactions.
Pfisterer et al. employed EC-TERS to image the oxidation of nanoscale protrusions at a Au(111) single-crystal electrode, with a spatial resolution of ∼10 nm. These protrusions, identified as Au oxide (AuO x ), were generated by electrochemical water splitting at defect sites (Figure a). Cyclic voltammogram (CV) of Au(111) in 0.1 M H2SO4 showed a broad shoulder peak from 1.32 to 1.48 V before the oxidation of Au terraces at 1.5 V, corresponding to the oxidation of selective oxidation of nanoscale defects. This was demonstrated by the presence of the Raman band at 560–580 cm–1 that was assigned to the AuO x compounds induced by water splitting, when the potential of the sample was maintained at 1.45 V (Figure b). EC-TERS maps and colocalized STM images further show that the AuO x peak at around 580 cm–1 is only present at the Au defect area, but not at the terraces (Figure c,d). By correlating the apparent height of the defect structures with the peak intensity and position of Au oxide in the EC-TERS spectra, they found that the maximum film thickness of AuO x is approximately 3 nm. A detailed analysis of the AuO x peak in the TER spectra acquired at various locations of the Au defect area was performed. For relatively flat areas on the defect, the peak is located above 565 cm–1 corresponding to the Au–O vibrations of Au2O3 (Figure e–f), whereas for protrusions, the Raman shift is smaller than 565 cm–1 corresponding to the Au–O vibrations of Au2O (Figure g). All these results contribute to the understanding of the origin of the broad and asymmetric peak shape of AuO x in electrochemistry and demonstrate the capabilities of EC-TERS in resolving the spatial distribution of active sites in electrocatalysis. While this work provides valuable insights into the electrooxidation of Au(111), the formation and evolution of such defects are not sufficiently explored. A detailed understanding of the initial stages of defect evolution would require a higher spatial resolution, on the order of a few nanometers. Notably, such advancements have emerged. A recent study by El-Khoury demonstrated TERS imaging of chemical reactions in H2O with a spatial resolution of ∼3 nm. Applying this improved resolution to electrochemical systems would enable a more detailed investigation of the growth of defects at metal electrodes.
7.
Visualization of the real–time reaction dynamics using TERS. (a) Schematic of probing the defect oxidation ON (right, 1.45 V vs Pd–H) and OFF (left, 1.1 V vs Pd–H) states of a Au(111) single crystal electrode using EC-TERS. (b) EC-TER spectra for ON (at 1.45 V) and OFF (at 1.1 V) states acquired at the defect site. (c,d) TERS intensity map of the AuO x Raman band (d) and the corresponding STM image (c) of the Au(111) substrate. Experimental conditions: I = 1 nA, E tip = 1.0 V vs Pd–H, E sample as indicated. Scale bar: 10 nm. (e) TERS intensity map of the AuO x Raman band extracted from the upper part of panel d. (f,g) Correlation between the EC-TERS AuO x peak positions and Δheight profiles, which are extracted from the TERS map in panel (e) and the corresponding STM image in panel (c), respectively. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the bootstrapping fitting analysis. Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2019 Springer Nature. (h). Schematic of the hydrogen coverage at the edge of MoS2 in different HER stages. Yellow and green spheres represent sulfur and hydrogen atoms, respectively. (i–l) Potential dependence of the peak positions (i,k) and intensities (j,l) of the two Raman modes, namely the 2LA (K–M) mode and the A1g mode, at the edge and basal plane of MoS2. Reprinted and adapted with permission from ref Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Recently, significant progress has been made by the Ren group in probing the structure evolution of active sites in MoS2 during the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), demonstrated by EC-TERS mapping. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the HER processes, a detailed characterization of the relationship between the surface structures and catalytic performance was conducted. When the potential was tuned from 0.05 V to −0.3 V (versus RHE) corresponding to different stages of the HER (Figure h), the TERS peaks of the MoS2 edge, in particular the A1g mode (405 cm–1) and the 2LA (K–M) mode (450 cm–1) originating from the van Hove singularity in the vibrational density of states at the saddle point along the KM direction, displayed an apparent evolution for both peak position and intensity. However, both peaks in the EC-TERS spectra of the basal plane remained almost unchanged, as shown in Figure i–l. This direct evidence confirmed that the active site for the HER was the edge of MoS2, as reported in other works. , Moreover, EC-TERS line scan was used to explore the dynamics of the active site and to visualize the synergistic evolution of atoms around it. The TERS line scan revealed an expansion of the lattice reconstruction region at the edge of a MoS2 bilayer during electrochemical activation, resulting from the adsorption and desorption of hydrogen atoms leading to the loss of sulfur atoms at the edge. This work provides a comprehensive characterization of the relationship between surface structures and catalytic performance, thereby revealing the intrinsic nature of MoS2’s active sites under operating conditions. However, key intermediates during HER, such as adsorbed interfacial water and highly reactive hydride species, were not detected in the TERS spectra. This limitation is likely due to the insufficient Raman enhancement from a single TERS hotspot for these transient species. Directly probing these intermediates under working conditions is crucial for a complete mechanistic understanding and remains a critical goal for future technical advancements in this field.
Similarly, Chen and co-workers employed the combined EC-TERS and DFT calculations to investigate the structure evolution and deactivation pathway of iron(II) phthalocyanine (FePc) during the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). The presence of the Raman peaks at 594, 682, and 751 cm–1 in the TER spectra indicated the formation of a nonplanar geometry of FePc during ORR catalysis at 0.4 V. Under extended cathodic polarization, both the appearance of the new peaks at 724 and 795 cm–1 and the attenuation of the peaks at 593 and 793 cm–1 in the TER spectra demonstrated the direct demetalation of FePc to form H2Pc during ORR. This is clear evidence to support the argument that the degradation mechanism of FePc during ORR involves a direct demetalation process. ,
3. Conclusion and Outlook
In this review, recent progress in the use of TERS for the structural, temporal, and spatially resolved analysis of heterogeneous catalysts has been highlighted. With the ultrahigh spatial resolution and high chemical sensitivity, TERS has demonstrated its capability to gain valuable insights into heterogeneous catalysis, including resolving the spatial distribution of active sites in catalysis and revealing the activation pathway and chemical selectivity, even under working conditions.
Despite the significant breakthroughs achieved by TERS in heterogeneous catalysis, considerable challenges persist, particularly in extending the technique’s applicability to industrially relevant catalysts. To date, the majority of TERS investigations have focused on highly idealized systems, such as thiolate self-assembled monolayers on atomically flat gold or silver substrates. In stark contrast, industrial catalysts are complex three-dimensional composites, often comprising metal nanoparticles dispersed on high-surface-area oxide supports (e.g., Pd/CeO2 and Cu/CeO2 catalysts) and metal clusters. − The intrinsic surface-sensitivity of TERS makes probing the chemical environment within the pores or beneath the surface layer of such materials exceptionally difficult. One promising strategy to overcome this limitation involves integrating TERS with advanced sample preparation methods, such as ultramicrotomy, to create smooth cross sections that expose the catalyst’s interior for analysis. Furthermore, the operational conditions of industrial catalysis under elevated temperatures and pressures (tens of bars for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis) pose severe challenges for TERS. These conditions can destabilize the tip–sample junction and degrade the plasmonic activity of the tip. The following discussion elaborates on these challenges and outlines potential strategies to advance TERS for broader application in heterogeneous catalysis.
3.1. Fabrication of Highly Active and Stable TERS Tips
Developing TERS tips with strong and stable plasmonic enhancement is paramount, as the tip is the cornerstone of the technique, dictating both spatial resolution and chemical sensitivity. Most TERS studies for the application of heterogeneous catalysis are demonstrated with the gap-mode TERS on coinage metal surfaces, such as Au and Ag. However, it is still quite difficult to probe the reactive species with the nongap-mode TERS or on noncoinage metal surfaces, such as Pt and Pd (typical catalytic metal), owing to the relatively low TERS enhancement on these surfaces in the visible light range. In addition, when the surface coverage of the reactive species is low, the detection of the TERS signal is rather challenging, even on coinage metals. This calls for the fabrication of highly active TERS tips with high reproducibility. To achieve this goal, the combination of simulations and accurate nanofabrication techniques, such as focused ion beam milling, , electron bombardment, and field-directed sputtering, can be carried out to fabricate highly active TERS tips with optimal radii of the curvature and the geometry. Another critical challenge is maintaining this enhancement in operando conditions, where the tip must remain stable against dynamic changes at the catalyst surface. The tip instability is a primary source of poor reproducibility, a long-standing issue in the field. Therefore, future progress hinges on fabricating more robust tips and integrating them into systems engineered for exceptional vibrational and electronic stability to ensure reliable feedback control. Promising strategies to mitigate tip degradation, such as applying protective coatings to the plasmonic nanostructure, have already been demonstrated to effectively prevent the laser-induced inactivation of the tip.
3.2. Thermal Drift
Most studies of heterogeneous catalysis using TERS are conducted at ambient or ultralow temperatures. However, many heterogeneous catalytic reactions are performed at high temperatures or high pressures. The reaction conditions at high temperatures give rise to a challenge in performing STM-TERS imaging under stable tunneling conditions to achieve high resolution images. Thus, it is desired to develop TERS equipment that could work under those relevant conditions. For STM-TERS, thermal drift mainly results from the temperature difference between a catalyst and the STM tip. This makes it difficult to achieve high resolution images at high temperatures. Fortunately, operating STM at a high temperature of 230 °C and a low pressure (30 mbar) has been demonstrated to achieve atom-resolved images. In addition, placing the tip close to the sample surface by 20–100 nm during the heating process of the catalyst before imaging could largely reduce the time to reach an approximate thermal equilibrium with the sample. , Moreover, introducing ultrafast TERS imaging techniques can further reduce the thermal drift of the system. It can be foreseen that developing TERS equipment that can perform at high temperatures or high pressures can significantly expand the application scope of TERS in catalysis.
3.3. Temporal Resolution
TERS provides information on the surface species with a high spatial resolution down to the single chemical bond level. However, the temporal resolution of TERS is still limited in the time scale of seconds, which is limited by the small Raman cross-section of the surface species. It usually takes minutes to hours to obtain an eligible TERS map. However, the interfacial reactions typically occur in the picosecond to femtosecond range. Thus, it is still quite difficult to monitor the surface reaction with TERS in real time. If the temporal resolution of TERS can be further improved to the picosecond or femtosecond level, it will enable the investigation of the dynamics of surface reactions with nanoscale spatial resolution. To this end, coupling ultrafast optical systems with TERS is one way to overcome this obstacle. Some pioneering works have been done in either ambient TERS , or UHV-TERS, , systems, demonstrating the successful implementation of TERS with ultrashort laser pulses. Moreover, overcoming the potential reactivity of the tip itself by appropriate coating of dielectric materials is beneficial to monitor the surface reactions. As mentioned above, fabricating highly active TERS tips can also effectively reduce the recording time of the TERS signal. We believe that the development of TERS with high spatiotemporal resolution will significantly deepen the understanding of heterogeneous catalysis.
3.4. Combination of Other Techniques
Combining TERS with other advanced surface characteristic techniques, such as in situ TEM, (near ambient pressure, NAP) XPS, mass spectrometry, XAS, scanning electrochemical microscopy, ,, and other methods, can yield more comprehensive and in-depth insights into catalytic processes. While TERS provides unparalleled nanoscale chemical information on surfaces, a complete mechanistic understanding requires correlating this data with the information on the electronic structure, morphology, and reaction kinetics of surfaces. A compelling case is its synergy with NAP-XPS. While both are surface-sensitive techniques capable of probing adsorbates and intermediates under various environments, they provide fundamentally different information. NAP-XPS is capable of quantifying the averaged electronic states and chemical composition of surfaces, as demonstrated by its use in elucidating the CO2 activation pathway on Cu(100), and the reduction dynamics by atomic dispersed Pt at the Cu/Cu2O interfaces. However, a critical limitation of NAP-XPS is its spatial resolution, which is constrained by the X-ray beam size to the micrometer scale. This inherently limits its ability to probe the nanoscale heterogeneity intrinsic to industrially relevant catalysts. While both techniques have been primarily applied to model, atomically flat systems, NAP-XPS faces even more formidable challenges than TERS in analyzing rough, high-surface-area materials under operating conditions of elevated temperature and pressure. We envision that overcoming these obstacles through technical advancements will make the combined application of TERS and NAP-XPS transformative. This multitechnique strategy, potentially extended to include in situ TEM, XAS, and mass spectrometry, will provide a comprehensive understanding of catalytic processes.
Besides, thanks to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, there have now been a few reports of applying AI or machine learning in the TERS field. , Compared with the traditional technique, the aforementioned tools help to save the acquisition time of TERS images and to accelerate the data analysis of TERS results, which is extremely useful when dealing with a large amount of imaging data. Upon overcoming the aforementioned challenges, TERS holds immense promise for establishing precise structure–activity relationships at the single-site level. A prime example is the evolution of active sites under operating conditions. Recent work by Shi et al. showed that lattice O–O ligands boost OER activity in iron-hydroxide catalysts, as corroborated by in situ Raman spectroscopy, XAS, and simulations, yet the pathway for their formation remains elusive. This is precisely where TERS could offer a transformative solution, by directly probing the generation of such transient species with (sub)nanoscale spatial resolution. The resulting profound insights are crucial for the rational design of advanced catalysts, fulfilling the ultimate objective of the field.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 92478110) and the Start-up Research Fund of Nanjing University (1480604106).
Glossary
Vocabulary Section
- Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS)
an analytical technique that combines scanning probe microscopy and plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, providing invaluable topographic and chemical information with nanoscale spatial resolution.
- Heterogeneous catalysis
a chemical process where the catalyst exists in a different phase (typically solid) than the reactants (usually liquid or gas).
- Active sites
the specific locations on the surface of a solid catalyst where the chemical reaction actually takes place.
- Conversion efficiency
a performance metric that describes how effectively a catalytic process transforms reactants into the desired products.
- Chemical selectivity
the ability of a catalyst to favor the formation of one desired product over other possible byproducts.
†.
Y.Z. and Y.X. contributed equally to this work. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Bell A. T.. The Impact of Nanoscience on Heterogeneous Catalysis. Science. 2003;299(5613):1688–1691. doi: 10.1126/science.1083671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tao F., Crozier P. A.. Atomic-Scale Observations of Catalyst Structures under Reaction Conditions and during Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2016;116(6):3487–3539. doi: 10.1021/cr5002657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Su X., Ding J., Zhou J., Liu Z., Wei X., Yang H. B., Liu B.. Progress and Challenges in Structural, in Situ and Operando Characterization of Single-Atom Catalysts by X-Ray Based Synchrotron Radiation Techniques. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024;53(24):11850–11887. doi: 10.1039/D3CS00967J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H., Sun J., He D., Zhao K., Qian B., Shi F.. Well-Defined Catalytic System for Integrating Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis. ACS Catal. 2024;14(21):16025–16043. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c03701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liang X., Fu N., Yao S., Li Z., Li Y.. The Progress and Outlook of Metal Single-Atom-Site Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(40):18155–18174. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Védrine J. C.. Metal Oxides in Heterogeneous Oxidation Catalysis: State of the Art and Challenges for a More Sustainable World. ChemSusChem. 2019;12(3):577–588. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201802248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang Y., Li F., Miao R. K., Hu S., Ni W., Zhang S., Liu Y., Bai Y., Wan H., Ou P., Li X.-Y., Wang N., Park S., Li F., Zeng J., Sinton D., Sargent E. H.. Efficient Ethylene Electrosynthesis through C-O Cleavage Promoted by Water Dissociation. Nat., Synth. 2024;3(9):1104–1112. doi: 10.1038/s44160-024-00568-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z., Ehtesabi S., Gojare S., Richter M., Kupfer S., Gräfe S., Kurouski D.. Plasmon-Determined Selectivity in Photocatalytic Transformations on Gold and Gold-Palladium Nanostructures. ACS Photonics. 2023;10(9):3390–3400. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guan Q., Zhu C., Lin Y., Vovk E. I., Zhou X., Yang Y., Yu H., Cao L., Wang H., Zhang X., Liu X., Zhang M., Wei S., Li W.-X., Lu J.. Bimetallic Monolayer Catalyst Breaks the Activity-Selectivity Trade-Off on Metal Particle Size for Efficient Chemoselective Hydrogenations. Nat. Catal. 2021;4(10):840–849. doi: 10.1038/s41929-021-00679-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dai J., Sun Y., Liu Z., Zhang Y., Duan S., Wang R.. Using in Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy to Study Strong Metal-Support Interactions in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;136(42):e202409673. doi: 10.1002/anie.202409673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiao F., Li J., Pan X., Xiao J., Li H., Ma H., Wei M., Pan Y., Zhou Z., Li M., Miao S., Li J., Zhu Y., Xiao D., He T., Yang J., Qi F., Fu Q., Bao X.. Selective Conversion of Syngas to Light Olefins. Science. 2016;351(6277):1065–1068. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiao F., Bai B., Li G., Pan X., Ye Y., Qu S., Xu C., Xiao J., Jia Z., Liu W., Peng T., Ding Y., Liu C., Li J., Bao X.. Disentangling the Activity-Selectivity Trade-Off in Catalytic Conversion of Syngas to Light Olefins. Science. 2023;380(6646):727–730. doi: 10.1126/science.adg2491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z., Wang Z., Mu H., Zhou Y., Zhou J., Dong Z.. Synthesis and Redox Catalysis of Carbodiphosphorane Ligated Stannylene. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):9849. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54321-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X., Huang S.-C., Huang T.-X., Su H.-S., Zhong J.-H., Zeng Z.-C., Li M.-H., Ren B.. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Surfaces and Interfaces. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46(13):4020–4041. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00206H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu P., Qin R., Fu G., Zheng N.. Surface Coordination Chemistry of Metal Nanomaterials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139(6):2122–2131. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b10978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su H.-S., Zhang X.-G., Sun J.-J., Jin X., Wu D.-Y., Lian X.-B., Zhong J.-H., Ren B.. Real-Space Observation of Atomic Site-Specific Electronic Properties of a Pt Nanoisland/Au(111) Bimetallic Surface by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57(40):13177–13181. doi: 10.1002/anie.201807778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H., Zhang X.-G., Wei J., Wang C., Chen S., Sun H.-L., Wang Y.-H., Chen B.-H., Yang Z.-L., Wu D.-Y., Li J.-F., Tian Z.-Q.. Revealing the Role of Interfacial Properties on Catalytic Behaviors by in Situ Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139(30):10339–10346. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buurmans I. L. C., Weckhuysen B. M.. Heterogeneities of Individual Catalyst Particles in Space and Time as Monitored by Spectroscopy. Nat. Chem. 2012;4(11):873–886. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding K., Gulec A., Johnson A. M., Schweitzer N. M., Stucky G. D., Marks L. D., Stair P. C.. Identification of Active Sites in CO Oxidation and Water-Gas Shift over Supported Pt Catalysts. Science. 2015;350(6257):189–192. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen G., Zhao Y., Fu G., Duchesne P. N., Gu L., Zheng Y., Weng X., Chen M., Zhang P., Pao C.-W., Lee J.-F., Zheng N.. Interfacial Effects in Iron-Nickel Hydroxide-Platinum Nanoparticles Enhance Catalytic Oxidation. Science. 2014;344(6183):495–499. doi: 10.1126/science.1252553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen Z.-Z., Zhang X.-S., Wan J., Liu G.-X., Tian J.-X., Liu B., Guo Y.-G., Wen R.. Nanoscale Visualization of Lithium Plating/Stripping Tuned by on-Site Formed Solid Electrolyte Interphase in All-Solid-State Lithium-Metal Batteries. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63(13):e202316837. doi: 10.1002/anie.202316837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen Z.-Z., Lang S.-Y., Liu R.-Z., Zhou C., Zhang Y.-Z., Liu B., Wen R.. Revealing the CO2 Conversion at Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces in Li-CO2 Batteries Via Nanoscale Visualization Methods. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63(1):e202316781. doi: 10.1002/anie.202316781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X., Cai Z.-F., Wang Y.-Q., Feng Y.-C., Yan H.-J., Wang D., Wan L.-J.. In Situ Scanning Tunneling Microscopy of Cobalt-Phthalocyanine-Catalyzed CO2 Reduction Reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59(37):16098–16103. doi: 10.1002/anie.202005242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amirbeigiarab R., Tian J., Herzog A., Qiu C., Bergmann A., Roldan Cuenya B., Magnussen O. M.. Atomic-Scale Surface Restructuring of Copper Electrodes under CO2 Electroreduction Conditions. Nat. Catal. 2023;6(9):837–846. doi: 10.1038/s41929-023-01009-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Velasco-Velez J.-J., Wu C. H., Pascal T. A., Wan L. F., Guo J., Prendergast D., Salmeron M.. The Structure of Interfacial Water on Gold Electrodes Studied by X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Science. 2014;346(6211):831–834. doi: 10.1126/science.1259437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen C., Chai J., Sun M., Guo T., Lin J., Zhou Y., Sun Z., Zhang F., Zhang L., Chen W., Li Y.. An Asymmetrically Coordinated Zncofe Hetero-Trimetallic Atom Catalyst Enhances the Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2024;17(6):2298–2308. doi: 10.1039/D4EE00134F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lian X., Gao J., Ding Y., Liu Y., Chen W.. Unraveling Catalytic Reaction Mechanism by in Situ near Ambient Pressure X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022;13(35):8264–8277. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mariano R. G., Kang M., Wahab O. J., McPherson I. J., Rabinowitz J. A., Unwin P. R., Kanan M. W.. Microstructural Origin of Locally Enhanced CO2 Electroreduction Activity on Gold. Nat. Mater. 2021;20(7):1000–1006. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-00958-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X., Han C., Xu W.. Imaging Analysis of Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy in Energy Catalysis. Chem. Biomed. Imaging. 2023;1(3):205–219. doi: 10.1021/cbmi.2c00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strange L. E., Li X., Wornyo E., Ashaduzzaman M., Pan S.. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy for Chemical Imaging and Understanding Redox Activities of Battery Materials. Chem. Biomed. Imaging. 2023;1(2):110–120. doi: 10.1021/cbmi.3c00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei J., Qin S.-N., Liu J.-L., Ruan X.-Y., Guan Z., Yan H., Wei D.-Y., Zhang H., Cheng J., Xu H., Tian Z.-Q., Li J.-F.. In Situ Raman Monitoring and Manipulating of Interfacial Hydrogen Spillover by Precise Fabrication of Au/TiO2/Pt Sandwich Structures. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59(26):10343–10347. doi: 10.1002/anie.202000426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartman T., Wondergem C. S., Kumar N., van den Berg A., Weckhuysen B. M.. Surface- and Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7(8):1570–1584. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dai J., Sun Y., Liu Z., Zhang Y., Duan S., Wang R.. Using in Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy to Study Strong Metal-Support Interactions in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63(42):e202409673. doi: 10.1002/anie.202409673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao H.-G., Cui L., Whitelam S., Zheng H.. Real-Time Imaging of Pt3Fe Nanorod Growth in Solution. Science. 2012;336(6084):1011–1014. doi: 10.1126/science.1219185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao H.-G., Zherebetskyy D., Xin H., Czarnik C., Ercius P., Elmlund H., Pan M., Wang L.-W., Zheng H.. Facet Development during Platinum Nanocube Growth. Science. 2014;345(6199):916–919. doi: 10.1126/science.1253149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng H., Meng Y. S., Zhu Y.. Frontiers of in Situ Electron Microscopy. MRS Bull. 2015;40(1):12–18. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2014.305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshimoto S., Itaya K.. Adsorption and Assembly of Ions and Organic Molecules at Electrochemical Interfaces: Nanoscale Aspects. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2013;6:213–235. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-062012-092559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Yang F., Zhang Y., Xiao J., Yu L., Liu Q., Ning Y., Zhou Z., Chen H., Huang W., Liu P., Bao X.. Enhanced Oxidation Resistance of Active Nanostructures Via Dynamic Size Effect. Nat. Commun. 2017;8(1):14459. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dell’Angela M., Anniyev T., Beye M., Coffee R., Föhlisch A., Gladh J., Katayama T., Kaya S., Krupin O., LaRue J., Møgelhøj A., Nordlund D., Nørskov J. K., Öberg H., Ogasawara H., Öström H., Pettersson L. G. M., Schlotter W. F., Sellberg J. A., Sorgenfrei F., Turner J. J., Wolf M., Wurth W., Nilsson A.. Real-Time Observation of Surface Bond Breaking with an X-Ray Laser. Science. 2013;339(6125):1302–1305. doi: 10.1126/science.1231711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X., Yang W., Liu Z.. Recent Progress on Synchrotron-Based in-Situ Soft X-Ray Spectroscopy for Energy Materials. Adv. Mater. 2014;26(46):7710–7729. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hess C.. New Advances in Using Raman Spectroscopy for the Characterization of Catalysts and Catalytic Reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50(5):3519–3564. doi: 10.1039/D0CS01059F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian S., Zhang Z., Meng F., Wang Z., Luo L.. Recent Advances in Enhancement of Raman Scattering Intensity for Biological Applications. Chem. Biomed. Imaging. 2023;1(7):575–589. doi: 10.1021/cbmi.3c00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stöckle R. M., Suh Y. D., Deckert V., Zenobi R.. Nanoscale Chemical Analysis by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000;318(1):131–136. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01451-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson M. S.. Locally Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with an Atomic Force Microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000;76(21):3130–3132. doi: 10.1063/1.126546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hayazawa N., Inouye Y., Sekkat Z., Kawata S.. Metallized Tip Amplification of near-Field Raman Scattering. Opt. Commun. 2000;183(1):333–336. doi: 10.1016/S0030-4018(00)00894-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pettinger B., Picardi G., Schuster R., Ertl G.. Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Towards Single Molecule Spectroscopy. Electrochemistry. 2000;68(12):942–949. doi: 10.5796/electrochemistry.68.942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stadler J., Schmid T., Zenobi R.. Nanoscale Chemical Imaging of Single-Layer Graphene. ACS Nano. 2011;5(10):8442–8448. doi: 10.1021/nn2035523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng L.-Q., Wang X., Shao F., Hegner M., Zenobi R.. Nanoscale Chemical Imaging of Reversible Photoisomerization of an Azobenzene-Thiol Self-Assembled Monolayer by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57(4):1025–1029. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng L.-Q., Servalli M., Schlüter A. D., Zenobi R.. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Structural Analysis of Two-Dimensional Covalent Monolayers Synthesized on Water and on Au (111) Chem. Sci. 2019;10(42):9673–9678. doi: 10.1039/C9SC03296G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shao F., Dai W., Zhang Y., Zhang W., Schlüter A. D., Zenobi R.. Chemical Mapping of Nanodefects within 2d Covalent Monolayers by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Nano. 2018;12(5):5021–5029. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng L.-Q., Yang S., Lan J., Gyr L., Goubert G., Qian H., Aprahamian I., Zenobi R.. Solution Phase and Surface Photoisomerization of a Hydrazone Switch with a Long Thermal Half-Life. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141(44):17637–17645. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b07057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xia Y., Greis K., Xu C., Kumar N., Zenobi R.. Monitoring the on-Surface Boronic Acid Condensation Process at the Nanoscale Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Nano. 2025;19(6):6511–6519. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c17728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu D., Li L., Jiang N.. Nanoscale Chemical Probing of Metal-Supported Ultrathin Ferrous Oxide Via Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Chem. Biomed. Imaging. 2024;2(5):345–351. doi: 10.1021/cbmi.4c00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verma P.. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Technique and Recent Advances. Chem. Rev. 2017;117(9):6447–6466. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pettinger B., Schambach P., Villagómez C. J., Scott N.. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Near-Fields Acting on a Few Molecules. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2012;63:379–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai Z.-F., Zheng L.-Q., Zhang Y., Zenobi R.. Molecular-Scale Chemical Imaging of the Orientation of an on-Surface Coordination Complex by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143(31):12380–12386. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c06366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mrd̵enović D., Ge W., Kumar N., Zenobi R.. Nanoscale Chemical Imaging of Human Cell Membranes Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61(43):e202210288. doi: 10.1002/anie.202210288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhong J.-H., Jin X., Meng L., Wang X., Su H.-S., Yang Z.-L., Williams C. T., Ren B.. Probing the Electronic and Catalytic Properties of a Bimetallic Surface with 3 nm Resolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017;12(2):132–136. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaculbia R. B., Imada H., Miwa K., Iwasa T., Takenaka M., Yang B., Kazuma E., Hayazawa N., Taketsugu T., Kim Y.. Single-Molecule Resonance Raman Effect in a Plasmonic Nanocavity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020;15(2):105–110. doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0614-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J., Zhu X., Tan S., Zhang Y., Li B., Tian Y., Shan H., Cui X., Zhao A., Dong Z., Yang J., Luo Y., Wang B., Hou J. G.. Determining Structural and Chemical Heterogeneities of Surface Species at the Single-Bond Limit. Science. 2021;371(6531):818–822. doi: 10.1126/science.abd1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang R., Zhang Y., Dong Z. C., Jiang S., Zhang C., Chen L. G., Zhang L., Liao Y., Aizpurua J., Luo Y., Yang J. L., Hou J. G.. Chemical Mapping of a Single Molecule by Plasmon-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Nature. 2013;498(7452):82–86. doi: 10.1038/nature12151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benz F., Schmidt M. K., Dreismann A., Chikkaraddy R., Zhang Y., Demetriadou A., Carnegie C., Ohadi H., de Nijs B., Esteban R., Aizpurua J., Baumberg J. J.. Single-Molecule Optomechanics in “Picocavities”. Science. 2016;354(6313):726–729. doi: 10.1126/science.aah5243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosławska A., Neuman T., Doppagne B., Borisov A. G., Romeo M., Scheurer F., Aizpurua J., Schull G.. Mapping Lamb, Stark, and Purcell Effects at a Chromophore-Picocavity Junction with Hyper-Resolved Fluorescence Microscopy. Phys. Rev. X. 2022;12(1):011012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Martín-Jiménez A., Fernández-Domínguez A. I., Lauwaet K., Granados D., Miranda R., García-Vidal F. J., Otero R.. Unveiling the Radiative Local Density of Optical States of a Plasmonic Nanocavity by Stm. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):1021. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14827-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Schrojenstein Lantman E. M., Deckert-Gaudig T., Mank A. J. G., Deckert V., Weckhuysen B. M.. Catalytic Processes Monitored at the Nanoscale with Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012;7(9):583–586. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang S., Chen Z., Chen X., Nguyen D., Mattei M., Goubert G., Van Duyne R. P.. Investigation of Cobalt Phthalocyanine at the Solid/Liquid Interface by Electrochemical Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019;123(15):9852–9859. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang S.-C., Ye J.-Z., Shen X.-R., Zhao Q.-Q., Zeng Z.-C., Li M.-H., Wu D.-Y., Wang X., Ren B.. Electrochemical Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Improved Sensitivity Enabled by a Water Immersion Objective. Anal. Chem. 2019;91(17):11092–11097. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmid T., Yeo B.-S., Leong G., Stadler J., Zenobi R.. Performing Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Liquids. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2009;40(10):1392–1399. doi: 10.1002/jrs.2387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Martín Sabanés N., Driessen L. M. A., Domke K. F.. Versatile Side-Illumination Geometry for Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy at Solid/Liquid Interfaces. Anal. Chem. 2016;88(14):7108–7114. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z., Kurouski D.. Probing the Plasmon-Driven Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling Reactions with Cargo-TERS Towards Tailored Catalysis. Nanoscale. 2021;13(27):11793–11799. doi: 10.1039/D1NR02478G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S., Li F., Zhao J., Zeng Y., Li Y., Lin Z.-Y., Lee T.-J., Liu S., Ren X., Wang W., Chen Y., Hung S.-F., Lu Y.-R., Cui Y., Yang X., Li X., Huang Y., Liu B.. Manipulating C-C Coupling Pathway in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction for Selective Ethylene and Ethanol Production over Single-Atom Alloy Catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):10247. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54636-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar N., Stephanidis B., Zenobi R., Wain A. J., Roy D.. Nanoscale Mapping of Catalytic Activity Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Nanoscale. 2015;7(16):7133–7137. doi: 10.1039/C4NR07441F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patil S. J., Kurouski D.. Tip-Enhanced Raman Imaging of Plasmon-Driven Dimerization of 4-Bromothiophenol on Nickel-Decorated Gold Nanoplate Bimetallic Nanostructures. Chem. Commun. 2023;59(73):10976–10979. doi: 10.1039/D3CC02670A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khoobiar S.. Particle to Particle Migration of Hydrogen Atoms on Platinum-Alumina Catalysts from Particle to Neighboring Particles. J. Phys. Chem. 1964;68(2):411–412. doi: 10.1021/j100784a503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Zhang R., Lin L., Wang Y., Liu C., Mu R., Fu Q.. Direct Observation of Accelerating Hydrogen Spillover Via Surface-Lattice-Confinement Effect. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):613. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36044-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin H., Zheng L.-Q., Fang W., Lai Y.-H., Porenta N., Goubert G., Zhang H., Su H.-S., Ren B., Richardson J. O., Li J.-F., Zenobi R.. Nanometre-Scale Spectroscopic Visualization of Catalytic Sites during a Hydrogenation Reaction on a Pd/Au Bimetallic Catalyst. Nat. Catal. 2020;3(10):834–842. doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-00511-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Su H.-S., Feng H.-S., Zhao Q.-Q., Zhang X.-G., Sun J.-J., He Y., Huang S.-C., Huang T.-X., Zhong J.-H., Wu D.-Y., Ren B.. Probing the Local Generation and Diffusion of Active Oxygen Species on a Pd/Au Bimetallic Surface by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(3):1341–1347. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b10512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai Z.-F., Merino J. P., Fang W., Kumar N., Richardson J. O., De Feyter S., Zenobi R.. Molecular-Level Insights on Reactive Arrangement in on-Surface Photocatalytic Coupling Reactions Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(1):538–546. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c11263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang R., Li J., Rigor J., Large N., El-Khoury P. Z., Rogachev A. Y., Kurouski D.. Direct Experimental Evidence of Hot Carrier-Driven Chemical Processes in Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (TERS) J. Phys. Chem. C. 2020;124(3):2238–2244. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b12002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cai Z.-F., Käser T., Kumar N., Zenobi R.. Visualizing on-Surface Decomposition Chemistry at the Nanoscale Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022;13(22):4864–4870. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szczerbiński J., Metternich J. B., Goubert G., Zenobi R.. How Peptides Dissociate in Plasmonic Hot Spots. Small. 2020;16(4):1905197. doi: 10.1002/smll.201905197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L., Schultz J. F., Mahapatra S., Liu X., Zhang X., Hersam M. C., Jiang N.. Atomic-Scale Insights into the Interlayer Characteristics and Oxygen Reactivity of Bilayer Borophene. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62(32):e202306590. doi: 10.1002/anie.202306590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai Z.-F., Tang Z.-X., Zhang Y., Kumar N.. Mechanistic Understanding of Oxygen Activation on Bulk Au(111) Surface Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63(19):e202318682. doi: 10.1002/anie.202318682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L., Schultz J. F., Mahapatra S., Lu Z., Zhang X., Jiang N.. Chemically Identifying Single Adatoms with Single-Bond Sensitivity during Oxidation Reactions of Borophene. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):1796. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29445-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ze H., Chen X., Wang X.-T., Wang Y.-H., Chen Q.-Q., Lin J.-S., Zhang Y.-J., Zhang X.-G., Tian Z.-Q., Li J.-F.. Molecular Insight of the Critical Role of Ni in Pt-Based Nanocatalysts for Improving the Oxygen Reduction Reaction Probed Using an in Situ SERS Borrowing Strategy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143(3):1318–1322. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c12755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shao F., Wong J. K., Low Q. H., Iannuzzi M., Li J., Lan J.. In situ spectroelectrochemical probing of CO redox landscape on copper single-crystal surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2022;119(29):e2118166119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118166119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi G., Li J., Lu T., Yang C., Xu Q., Gu H., Tong H., Zhao S., Zhu C., Shen Y., Wu J., Lao X., Chen P.-C., Li J., Zhang S., Shi J., Zhang K. H. L., Li Y.-F., Liu Z.-P., Zhang L.. Lattice O-O Ligands in Fe-Incorporated Hydroxides Enhance Water Oxidation Electrocatalysis. Nat. Chem. 2025;17:1607–1614. doi: 10.1038/s41557-025-01898-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Y.-F., Zhu H.-P., Liu G.-K., Wu D.-Y., Ren B., Tian Z.-Q.. When the Signal Is Not from the Original Molecule to Be Detected: Chemical Transformation of Para-Aminothiophenol on Ag during the SERS Measurement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(27):9244–9246. doi: 10.1021/ja101107z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Y.-F., Wu D.-Y., Zhu H.-P., Zhao L.-B., Liu G.-K., Ren B., Tian Z.-Q.. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Study of p-Aminothiophenol. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012;14(24):8485–8497. doi: 10.1039/c2cp40558j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patil S. J., Kurouski D.. Nanoscale Imaging of Palladium-Enhanced Photocatalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrothiophenol on Tungsten Disulfide Nanoplates. Nano Lett. 2024;24(41):13004–13009. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J.-J., Su H.-S., Yue H.-L., Huang S.-C., Huang T.-X., Hu S., Sartin M. M., Cheng J., Ren B.. Role of Adsorption Orientation in Surface Plasmon-Driven Coupling Reactions Studied by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019;10(10):2306–2312. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikeda K., Suzuki S., Uosaki K.. Crystal Face Dependent Chemical Effects in Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering at Atomically Defined Gold Facets. Nano Lett. 2011;11(4):1716–1722. doi: 10.1021/nl200251a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahapatra S., Schultz J. F., Li L., Zhang X., Jiang N.. Controlling Localized Plasmons Via an Atomistic Approach: Attainment of Site-Selective Activation inside a Single Molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(5):2051–2055. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c11547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z., Kurouski D.. Probing the Redox Selectivity on Au@Pd and Au@Pt Bimetallic Nanoplates by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Photonics. 2021;8(7):2112–2119. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z., Kurouski D.. Elucidation of Photocatalytic Properties of Gold-Platinum Bimetallic Nanoplates Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2020;124(23):12850–12854. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z., Wang R., Kurouski D.. Nanoscale Photocatalytic Activity of Gold and Gold-Palladium Nanostructures Revealed by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020;11(14):5531–5537. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tao F., Salmeron M.. In Situ Studies of Chemistry and Structure of Materials in Reactive Environments. Science. 2011;331(6014):171–174. doi: 10.1126/science.1197461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng Z.-C., Huang S.-C., Wu D.-Y., Meng L.-Y., Li M.-H., Huang T.-X., Zhong J.-H., Wang X., Yang Z.-L., Ren B.. Electrochemical Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137(37):11928–11931. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurouski D., Mattei M., Van Duyne R. P.. Probing Redox Reactions at the Nanoscale with Electrochemical Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2015;15(12):7956–7962. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martín Sabanés N., Ohto T., Andrienko D., Nagata Y., Domke K. F.. Electrochemical TERS Elucidates Potential-Induced Molecular Reorientation of Adenine/Au(111) Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;56(33):9796–9801. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfisterer J. H. K., Baghernejad M., Giuzio G., Domke K. F.. Reactivity Mapping of Nanoscale Defect Chemistry under Electrochemical Reaction Conditions. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):5702. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13692-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Khoury P. Z.. Tip-Enhanced Raman Chemical and Chemical Reaction Imaging in H2O with Sub-3-nm Spatial Resolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145(12):6639–6642. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c01626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang T.-X., Cong X., Wu S.-S., Wu J.-B., Bao Y.-F., Cao M.-F., Wu L., Lin M.-L., Wang X., Tan P.-H., Ren B.. Visualizing the Structural Evolution of Individual Active Sites in MoS2 during Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Nat. Catal. 2024;7(6):646–654. doi: 10.1038/s41929-024-01148-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jaramillo T. F., Jørgensen K. P., Bonde J., Nielsen J. H., Horch S., Chorkendorff I.. Identification of Active Edge Sites for Electrochemical H2 Evolution from MoS2 Nanocatalysts. Science. 2007;317(5834):100–102. doi: 10.1126/science.1141483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng J., Li H., Xiao J., Tu Y., Deng D., Yang H., Tian H., Li J., Ren P., Bao X.. Triggering the Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Activity of the Inert Two-Dimensional MoS2 Surface Via Single-Atom Metal Doping. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8(5):1594–1601. doi: 10.1039/C5EE00751H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z., Jiang S., Kang G., Nguyen D., Schatz G. C., Van Duyne R. P.. Operando Characterization of Iron Phthalocyanine Deactivation during Oxygen Reduction Reaction Using Electrochemical Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141(39):15684–15692. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b07979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi C. H., Baldizzone C., Polymeros G., Pizzutilo E., Kasian O., Schuppert A. K., Ranjbar Sahraie N., Sougrati M.-T., Mayrhofer K. J. J., Jaouen F.. Minimizing Operando Demetallation of Fe-N-C Electrocatalysts in Acidic Medium. ACS Catal. 2016;6(5):3136–3146. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00643. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Muravev V., Parastaev A., van den Bosch Y., Ligt B., Claes N., Bals S., Kosinov N., Hensen E. J. M.. Size of Cerium Dioxide Support Nanocrystals Dictates Reactivity of Highly Dispersed Palladium Catalysts. Science. 2023;380(6650):1174–1179. doi: 10.1126/science.adf9082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song T., Shen C., Tian Y., Zhai Q., Tang S., Zhu Y.. A Heterodimeric Cluster-based Pair Catalyst for Electrochemical Synthesis of Cyclohexanone Oxime. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202507569. doi: 10.1002/anie.202507569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song T., Liu X., Wang H., Yuan Q., Cai X., Ding W., Zhu Y.. Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide over atomically precise metal clusters toward fine chemicals. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2025;543:216922. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.216922. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Z., Zhou C., Chen Z., Zeng Y., Sun T., Dong X., Yang L., Wang X., Wu Q., Huang H., He L., Hu Z.. Decoupling Activity-Selectivity Trade-off in Photothermal Catalytic CO2 Hydrogenation: A Hydrogen Spillover-Assisted Dual-Site Synergy Mechanism. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202508090. doi: 10.1002/anie.202508090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai X., Wang H., Tian Y., Ding W., Zhu Y.. Catalytic Application of Atomically Precise Metal Clusters in Selective Hydrogenation Processes. ACS Catal. 2024;14:11918–11930. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c02965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Qiao Y., Shen S., Mao C., Xiao Y., Lai W., Wang Y., Zhong X., Lu Y., Li J., Ge J., Hsu H.-Y., Su Y., Shao M., Hu Z., Huang H.. Interfacial Oxygen Vacancy-Copper Pair Sites on Inverse CeO2/Cu Catalyst Enable Efficient CO2 Electroreduction to Ethanol in Acid. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202424248. doi: 10.1002/anie.202424248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao S., Gao L., Tao H., Gong L., Yu J., Lu Y., Lian C., Li X., Huang H.. Partially Amorphous Pearl-Chain-Shaped PtTe Nanowires for Robust Fuel Cell Catalysis. Nano Lett. 2025;25:8732–8739. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c01757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar N., Kalirai S., Wain A. J., Weckhuysen B. M.. Nanoscale Chemical Imaging of a Single Catalyst Particle with Tip-Enhanced Fluorescence Microscopy. ChemCatChem. 2019;11(1):417–423. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201801023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li J., He Y., Tan L., Zhang P., Peng X., Oruganti A., Yang G., Abe H., Wang Y., Tsubaki N.. Integrated Tuneable Synthesis of Liquid Fuels Via Fischer–Tropsch Technology. Nat. Catal. 2018;1(10):787–793. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0144-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vasconcelos T. L., Archanjo B. S., Fragneaud B., Oliveira B. S., Riikonen J., Li C., Ribeiro D. S., Rabelo C., Rodrigues W. N., Jorio A., Achete C. A., Cançado L. G.. Tuning Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance in Scanning near-Field Optical Microscopy Probes. ACS Nano. 2015;9(6):6297–6304. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vasconcelos T. L., Archanjo B. S., Oliveira B. S., Valaski R., Cordeiro R. C., Medeiros H. G., Rabelo C., Ribeiro A., Ercius P., Achete C. A., Jorio A., Cançado L. G.. Plasmon-Tunable Tip Pyramids: Monopole Nanoantennas for near-Field Scanning Optical Microscopy. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018;6(20):1800528. doi: 10.1002/adom.201800528. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Böckmann H., Liu S., Müller M., Hammud A., Wolf M., Kumagai T.. Near-Field Manipulation in a Scanning Tunneling Microscope Junction with Plasmonic Fabry-Pérot Tips. Nano Lett. 2019;19(6):3597–3602. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tallarida N., Lee J., Apkarian V. A.. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectromicroscopy on the Angstrom Scale: Bare and CO-Terminated Ag Tips. ACS Nano. 2017;11(11):11393–11401. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b06022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szczerbiński J., Yin H., Zhang Y.-J., Zhang F.-L., Li J.-F., Zenobi R.. Preserving Plasmonic Nanostructures from Laser-Induced Deactivation by a Protective Dielectric Shell. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2020;124(11):6385–6394. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tao F., Nguyen L., Zhang S.. Design of a New Reactor-Like High Temperature near Ambient Pressure Scanning Tunneling Microscope for Catalysis Studies. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2013;84(3):034101. doi: 10.1063/1.4792673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tao F., Tang D., Salmeron M., Somorjai G. A.. A New Scanning Tunneling Microscope Reactor Used for High-Pressure and High-Temperature Catalysis Studies. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2008;79(8):084101. doi: 10.1063/1.2960569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bao Y.-F., Zhu M.-Y., Zhao X.-J., Chen H.-X., Wang X., Ren B.. Nanoscale Chemical Characterization of Materials and Interfaces by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024;53(20):10044–10079. doi: 10.1039/D4CS00588K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee J., Crampton K. T., Tallarida N., Apkarian V. A.. Visualizing Vibrational Normal Modes of a Single Molecule with Atomically Confined Light. Nature. 2019;568(7750):78–82. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wickramasinghe H. K., Chaigneau M., Yasukuni R., Picardi G., Ossikovski R.. Billion-Fold Increase in Tip-Enhanced Raman Signal. ACS Nano. 2014;8(4):3421–3426. doi: 10.1021/nn406263m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ichimura T., Hayazawa N., Hashimoto M., Inouye Y., Kawata S.. Tip-Enhanced Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering for Vibrational Nanoimaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;92(22):220801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.220801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pozzi E. A., Sonntag M. D., Jiang N., Chiang N., Seideman T., Hersam M. C., Van Duyne R. P.. Ultrahigh Vacuum Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Picosecond Excitation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014;5(15):2657–2661. doi: 10.1021/jz501239z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo Y., Martin-Jimenez A., Gutzler R., Garg M., Kern K.. Ultrashort Pulse Excited Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Molecules. Nano Lett. 2022;22(13):5100–5106. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Höppener C., Aizpurua J., Chen H., Gräfe S., Jorio A., Kupfer S., Zhang Z., Deckert V.. Tip-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers. 2024;4(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s43586-024-00323-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J.-L., Zhou Y.-W., Jia M.-Y., Liu Q., Cai Z.-F.. Insights into Heterogeneous Catalysis by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. ChemCatChem. 2024;16(17):e202400370. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202400370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Eren B., Weatherup R. S., Liakakos N., Somorjai G. A., Salmeron M.. Dissociative Carbon Dioxide Adsorption and Morphological Changes on Cu(100) and Cu(111) at Ambient Pressures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138(26):8207–8211. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schilling A. C., Groden K., Simonovis J. P., Hunt A., Hannagan R. T., Çınar V., McEwen J.-S., Sykes E. C. H., Waluyo I.. Accelerated Cu2O Reduction by Single Pt Atoms at the Metal-Oxide Interface. ACS Catal. 2020;10(7):4215–4226. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b05270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- He H., Cao M., Gao Y., Zheng P., Yan S., Zhong J.-H., Wang L., Jin D., Ren B.. Noise Learning of Instruments for High-Contrast, High-Resolution and Fast Hyperspectral Microscopy and Nanoscopy. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):754. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44864-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






