Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2026 Apr 21;22(4):e1012118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1012118

Inducible gene deletion reveals essentiality of protein kinases and a septation initiation network in Candida albicans

Bernardo Ramírez-Zavala 1, Ines Krüger 1, Sonja Schwanfelder 1, Johannes Lackner 1, Thomas Krüger 2, Olaf Kniemeyer 2, Joachim Morschhäuser 1,*
Editor: Jennifer A Benanti3
PMCID: PMC13128113  PMID: 42013161

Abstract

Protein kinases are key components of many signaling pathways that regulate cellular activities, and some of them are indispensable for the viability of cells. We used inducible gene deletion to assess the importance of a set of putative essential protein kinases for growth and viability of the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans and to get clues about the functions of uncharacterized essential kinases. We found that bud32Δ, ctk1Δ, rio1Δ, and rio2Δ mutants were viable but grew very slowly, explaining previous failures to generate homozygous deletion mutants. PTK2 was essential, but under certain conditions ptk2Δ mutants remained viable and over time could acquire suppressor mutations in the Ptk2-dependent plasma membrane ATPase Pma1 that restored growth. Deletion of the uncharacterized orf19.5376 was lethal and the null mutants formed pseudohyphae that lacked normal septa and eventually lysed, a phenotype that was phenocopied by auxin-induced protein depletion. The mutants were defective in septin organization, indicating that the orf19.5376-encoded kinase is functionally similar to the nonessential kinase Elm1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but is indispensable for viability in C. albicans. Mutants lacking orf19.3456, which does not have a homolog in S. cerevisiae, were also nonviable and grew as aseptate, sometimes multinucleate hyphae before cell death. Co-immunoprecipitation followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry identified a protein, encoded by the uncharacterized orf19.193, as a candidate regulatory subunit of the orf19.3456-encoded kinase, as mutants lacking this protein exhibited the same terminal phenotype as orf19.3456 mutants. These results provide strong evidence that instead of using a mitotic exit network (MEN) with only two kinases (Cdc15 and Dbf2), as was previously thought, C. albicans regulates septum formation and cytokinesis via a septation initiation network (SIN), known from fission yeast and filamentous fungi, which contains a protein kinase cascade consisting of the upstream kinase Cdc15, the orf19.3456-encoded kinase, and the downstream kinase Dbf2.

Author summary

Elucidating the function of essential genes in the biology of an organism is challenging, because mutants lacking an essential gene are inviable and cannot be recovered by standard methods. To investigate the importance of a set of putative essential protein kinases for growth and viability of the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans, we generated mutants by forced, inducible gene deletion, which provides definite proof of whether a gene is essential or not. Some of the mutants turned out to be viable but grew very slowly, explaining previous failures to obtain homozygous deletion mutants. Other kinases were truly essential for viability, and the terminal phenotypes of the mutants before cell death provided insights into their function. Mutants lacking a previously uncharacterized kinase that has no homolog in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae were unable to grow as budding yeast cells and formed hyphae without septa that eventually lysed. Our results reveal that C. albicans and other pathogenic Candida species unexpectedly use a protein kinase signaling pathway that is known from fission yeast and filamentous fungi to regulate septum formation and cytokinesis during the cell cycle.

Introduction

Protein kinases are key components of many signaling pathways that regulate basic cellular activities and the responses of cells to external signals. Deciphering the functions of individual protein kinases is therefore important to understand the regulatory networks that control the behavior of organisms and how they adapt to changes in their environment. The pathogenic yeast Candida albicans possesses 108 genes encoding known or predicted protein kinase catalytic subunits [1]. To enable systematic investigations of their roles in the biology and pathogenicity of this fungus, we previously had generated a comprehensive protein kinase deletion mutant library of the wild-type reference strain SC5314 [2,3]. We could successfully construct homozygous null mutants for 86 of these genes by sequentially deleting both alleles using the SAT1-flipping strategy [4,5]. For the remaining 22 protein kinase genes, only heterozygous mutants were obtained, possibly because they are essential for viability. Alternatively, the selection conditions might have prevented the recovery of homozygous mutants. Indeed, subsequent investigations showed that for two of these kinases, Snf1 and Ypk1, which were thought to be essential [6–10], null mutants could be generated by forced, inducible gene deletion [11,12]. The snf1Δ and ypk1Δ mutants exhibited a slow-growth phenotype that precluded their isolation under routine selection conditions. In the case of the snf1Δ mutants, growth was strongly improved at 37°C compared with the standard incubation temperature of 30°C [11].

The strategy of inducible gene deletion in C. albicans, which was originally established in our lab for an auxotrophic laboratory strain [13] and recently modified for use in wild-type strains [11], is outlined in Fig 1. A gene cassette containing a functional copy of the putative essential gene and a hygromycin resistance marker (HygB), flanked by target sequences of the site-specific recombinase FLP, is inserted at an ectopic site in the genome of heterozygous mutants. The second endogenous allele of the target gene can then be deleted using the recyclable SAT1 flipper cassette. Finally, the ecaFLP (enhanced Candida-adapted FLP) gene, encoding a mutated version of the FLP recombinase with enhanced activity, is integrated under the control of the tightly regulated and efficiently inducible SAP2 promoter, using a nourseothricin resistance marker (caSAT1), to generate the desired conditional mutants. Passage in SAP2-inducing medium results in the excision of the FLP-deletable gene copy in the vast majority of the cells to produce an almost pure population of null mutants. Plating of these cells and incubation under any desired conditions provides definite proof of whether the gene is essential (no colony formation) or not. Furthermore, the phenotype and behavior of the null mutants before cell death may offer clues about the essential biological functions of the encoded protein. In the present study, we used this approach to assess the essentiality of a select set of protein kinases (as explained below) and obtain insights into the function of kinases that are indispensable for the viability of C. albicans wild-type cells.

Fig 1. Schematic illustrating the generation of the inducible gene deletion mutants.

Fig 1

Heterozygous mutants (M2) in which one allele of the putative essential kinase gene (PEK, green arrow) is already deleted were previously constructed. Ectopic integration of a functional PEK copy and the HygB selection marker (yellow arrow), flanked by FLP recognition sites (FRT, red chevrons), at the ADH1 locus results in M3 mutants. Replacement of the second endogenous PEK allele by the SAT1 flipper cassette (SAT1-FLIP, blue bar) and subsequent excision of the SAT1 flipper cassette yields M4 and M5 mutants, respectively. A PSAP2-ecaFLP fusion (orange arrow) is then inserted into the SAP2 locus with the help of the caSAT1 selection marker (blue arrow) to obtain the conditional M6 mutants. The PSAP2-ecaFLP fusion is also integrated into the M3 mutants to produce control strains (M7) retaining one of the endogenous PEK alleles. If the PEK gene is not essential, forced deletion of the ectopically integrated copy after passage of the conditional mutants in SAP2-inducing YCB-BSA-YE medium yields viable pekΔ null mutants (M8) and corresponding control strains (M9). In the case of KSP1, excision of the SAT1 flipper cassette from M4 mutants also produced derivatives that had simultaneously excised the ectopically integrated KSP1 copy, which were kept as null mutants (KSP1M5).

Results

Inducible deletion of putative essential protein kinase genes

We selected eight protein kinases (Table 1) for which we had not obtained homozygous deletion mutants during the construction of our library [2,3] to firmly establish by inducible gene deletion whether they are essential or not for viability in the wild-type reference strain SC5314. In a previous genome-wide in vivo transposon mutagenesis study with a haploid C. albicans strain, seven of these were deemed essential and only one of them (KSP1) was found to be dispensable [9]. Mutants in which KSP1 was inactivated by gene-specific transposon insertions had also been obtained before [6], but no homozygous ksp1Δ mutants were recovered in another targeted approach [14]. Both of the latter two studies found BUD32 to be nonessential, but conflicting results were obtained for other kinases. CTK1 and RIO1 were considered as putative essential genes because no homozygous mutants were obtained by Blankenship et al. [6], but ctk1Δ and rio1Δ mutants were recently generated by Kramara et al. [14]. Conversely, ptk2 and rio2 transposon insertion mutants were obtained by Blankenship et al. [6] while no homozygous ptk2Δ and rio2Δ mutants could be generated by Kramara et al. [14]. For the two predicted protein kinases encoded by orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 no null mutants were obtained in all three studies. Interestingly, analysis of the GRACE collection of repressible mutants found none of the eight kinases to be essential, and only one of them (the BUD32 knock-down) exhibited a detectable growth defect [15] (see Table 1 for a summary).

Table 1. Protein kinases analyzed in this study and reported putative essentiality1.

Gene name orf19 number Tn mutagenesis2 UAU1 method3 Deletion4 Repression5
BUD32 orf19.4252 ESS NE NE NE
CTK1 orf19.1619 ESS ESS NE NE
KSP1 orf19.4432 NE NE ESS NE
PTK2 orf19.3415 ESS NE ESS NE
RIO1 orf19.2320 ESS ESS NE NE
RIO2 orf19.6369 ESS NE ESS NE
orf19.3456 ESS ESS ESS NE
orf19.5376 ESS ESS ESS NE

1ESS, essential; NE, not essential

2ESS: No transposon insertions in haploid strain [9]

3ESS: No homozygous insertion mutants obtained by UAU1 method [6]

4ESS: No homozygous deletion mutants obtained [14]

5NE: Conditional mutants viable under repressive conditions [15]

For these eight putative essential kinases (PEKs), we generated inducible deletion mutants containing a single FLP-deletable gene copy (M6 mutants) as well as control strains that additionally retained one of the endogenous alleles (M7 mutants), as illustrated in Fig 1. All conditional mutants grew as well as the wild-type strain SC5314 and control strains, demonstrating that each of the single ectopically integrated gene copies was sufficient for normal growth under standard conditions (S1 Fig). After the induced gene deletion, five of the eight null mutants (bud32Δ, ctk1Δ, ksp1Δ, rio1Δ, rio2Δ) remained viable and produced colonies upon subsequent plating and incubation on YPD medium (Fig 2). In the case of KSP1, this became evident already after the excision of the SAT1 flipper cassette from the second endogenous allele, as some of the analyzed descendants had simultaneously excised the ectopically integrated KSP1 copy and become null mutants (see Fig 1). The ksp1Δ mutants grew as well as the wild-type strain SC5314 and control strains retaining the ectopically integrated KSP1 copy (Figs 2, S2; the plates shown in Fig 2 contain both types of M4 derivatives), demonstrating that our previous failure to obtain homozygous ksp1Δ mutants had technical reasons. The bud32Δ, rio1Δ, and especially the ctk1Δ and rio2Δ mutants generated by forced deletion of the ectopically integrated last gene copy grew poorly on rich medium, with improved growth at 37°C compared to 30°C, explaining why homozygous mutants were not recovered in our previous efforts (Figs 2, S2).

Fig 2. Growth of viable pekΔ null mutants.

Fig 2

The conditional M6 mutants and M7 control strains were passaged overnight in YCB-BSA-YE medium to induce FLP-mediated excison of the ectopically integrated PEK copy. For KSP1 the M4 mutants were used. Appropriate dilutions of the cultures were plated on YPD medium and incubated at 30°C and at 37°C. Photographs were taken after 2, 4, and 6 days. The two independently generated series of strains behaved identically and only one of them is shown in each case.

In contrast, after deletion of the last copy of PTK2, orf19.3456, and orf19.5376, the null mutants were unable to grow under standard conditions (Fig 3). The induced gene deletion occurred with high efficiency, since <0.1% of the cells grown in the inducing medium produced normal colonies after plating on rich medium, in contrast to the control strains in which the majority of cells yielded colonies (Table 2). However, upon prolonged incubation, the ptk2Δ mutants started to form visible colonies of different sizes, especially at 37°C in a CO2 incubator, suggesting that the mutants survived the gene deletion and over time accumulated suppressor mutations that enabled growth (Fig 3). When restreaked on fresh medium, cells from large colonies grew well also at 30°C (S3A Fig), indicating that incubation in a CO2 incubator only facilitated the acquisition of suppressor mutations. We confirmed that the ectopically integrated PTK2 copy had been correctly excised by FLP-mediated recombination in four well-growing ptk2Δ mutants, two each derived from conditional mutants M6A and M6B (S3 Fig). Ptk2 has two largely redundant orthologs in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ptk1 and Ptk2, which are required for the activity of the essential plasma membrane H+-ATPase Pma1 by phosphorylating its autoinhibitory C-terminal domain at S911 and T912 [16]. The corresponding residues S888 and T889 are conserved in C. albicans Pma1 and have been found to be phosphorylated in two phosphoproteome studies [17,18]. Deletion of the autoinhibitory domain, and also a G648S substitution in Pma1 that interferes with the self-inhibition, bypass the requirement for Ptk1/2 in S. cerevisiae and render ptk1Δ ptk2Δ double mutants viable [16]. We therefore sequenced the PMA1 alleles of the four ptk2Δ suppressor mutants shown in S3 Fig. Intriguingly, three of the four clones contained mutations in PMA1. Clone A1 was heterozygous for a T1760C mutation resulting in a G587A substitution in Pma1, A2 was homozygous for a C1709T mutation resulting in an A570V substitution, and B2 was heterozygous for a T2647C mutation resulting in a S883P substitution. Clone B1 did not contain a mutation in the PMA1 coding sequence and retained the wild-type alleles. These results indicate that the essential function of Ptk1/2 in Pma1 activation in S. cerevisiae is conserved in C. albicans Ptk2, and suppressor mutations in Pma1, but also other mutations, enable growth of ptk2Δ mutants. Some slow-growing colonies also appeared after prolonged growth of orf19.3456Δ and orf19.5376Δ mutants, but at a much lower frequency (Fig 3, which also shows a rare normally growing colony from a cell that had escaped FLP-mediated orf19.5376 deletion), indicating that the encoded kinases are essential for viability of the wild-type strain SC5314.

Fig 3. PTK2, orf19.3456, and orf19.5376 are essential.

Fig 3

The conditional M6 mutants and M7 control strains were passaged overnight in YCB-BSA-YE medium to induce FLP-mediated excison of the ectopically integrated PEK copy. Appropriate dilutions of the cultures were plated on YPD medium and incubated at 30°C, 37°C, and in a CO2 incubator at 37°C. Photographs were taken after 2 and 6 days. The two independently generated series of strains behaved identically and only one of them is shown in each case.

Table 2. Efficiency of induced gene deletion.

Strain 1 Description Total cells/ml CFU/ml CFU/total cells
SCPTK2M6A (1) Conditional ptk2∆ mutant 1.3 x 109 2.5 x 105 1.9 x 10–4
SCPTK2M6A (2) Conditional ptk2∆ mutant 1.2 x 109 1.6 x 105 1.3 x 10–4
SCPTK2M6B (1) Conditional ptk2∆ mutant 1.4 x 109 2.6 x 105 1.9 x 10–4
SCPTK2M6B (2) Conditional ptk2∆ mutant 1.2 x 109 2.8 x 105 2.4 x 10–4
SCPTK2M7A (1) Control strain 1.2 x 109 8.2 x 108 0.67
SCPTK2M7A (2) Control strain 1.3 x 109 7.8 x 108 0.62
SCPTK2M7B (1) Control strain 1.1 x 109 7.7 x 108 0.72
SCPTK2M7B (2) Control strain 1.2 x 109 8.3 x 108 0.70
SC3456M6A (1) Conditional orf19.3456∆ mutant 1.4 x 109 3.5 x 105 1.9 x 10–4
SC3456M6A (2) Conditional orf19.3456∆ mutant 1.4 x 109 2.3 x 105 1.3 x 10–4
SC3456M6B (1) Conditional orf19.3456∆ mutant 1.2 x 109 1.4 x 105 1.9 x 10–4
SC3456M6B (2) Conditional orf19.3456∆ mutant 1.3 x 109 2.7 x 105 2.4 x 10–4
SC3456M7A (1) Control strain 9.4 x 108 9.4 x 108 0.67
SC3456M7A (2) Control strain 1.3 x 109 9.1 x 108 0.62
SC3456M7B (1) Control strain 1.2 x 109 1.1 x 109 0.72
SC3456M7B (2) Control strain 1.2 x 109 9.2 x 108 0.70
SC5376M6A (1) Conditional orf19.5376∆ mutant 1.3 x 109 7.3 x 105 5.5 x 10–4
SC5376M6A (2) Conditional orf19.5376∆ mutant 1.6 x 109 4.6 x 105 3.0 x 10–4
SC5376M6B (1) Conditional orf19.53576∆ mutant 1.2 x 109 6.0 x 105 5.1 x 10–4
SC5376M6B (2) Conditional orf19.5376∆ mutant 1.4 x 109 8.0 x 105 5.8 x 10–4
SC5376M7A (1) Control strain 1.2 x 109 1.1 x 109 0.91
SC5376M7A (2) Control strain 1.3 x 109 7.7 x 108 0.58
SC5376M7B (1) Control strain 1.1 x 109 8.5 x 108 0.75
SC5376M7B (2) Control strain 1.3 x 109 1.0 x 109 0.81

1Two independent colonies of each strain were tested.

Phenotype of orf19.3456Δ and orf19.5376Δ mutants

We focused our further efforts on the two uncharacterized essential protein kinases encoded by orf19.3456 and orf19.5376. We first monitored the terminal phenotype of the null mutants by inoculating them onto YPD agar after the induced gene deletion and observing the cells by time-lapse video microscopy. In contrast to the wild-type strain SC5314 and the M7 control strains, which grew as budding yeasts under these conditions, both mutants were unable to maintain the normal yeast morphology after 2–3 initial cell doublings that were likely enabled by remaining gene product (S1-S5 Videos, Figs 4, S4). The orf19.3456Δ mutants first formed aberrantly shaped cells and then often grew as thin hyphae; over time the filaments stopped elongating and the cells eventually lysed. The orf19.5376Δ mutants produced pseudohyphae with constrictions between highly elongated cells, ultimately followed by cell lysis.

Fig 4. Terminal phenotype of orf19.3456Δ and orf19.5376Δ mutants.

Fig 4

The conditional M6 mutants were passaged overnight in YCB-BSA-YE medium to induce FLP-mediated excison of the ectopically integrated gene copy. The cultures were diluted in water, transferred to a 35 mm culture dish, covered with YPD agar, and incubated at 30°C. Images were taken every 5 min with a DMI6000 Leica inverted microscope (S1-S3 Videos). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points. The wild-type strain SC5314 was treated identically and is included for comparison. M7 control strains are shown in S4-S5 Videos and S6 Fig.

To further characterize the filamentous cells of the mutants, the strains were grown in YPD liquid medium after the induced gene deletion and then fixed and treated with calcofluor white, to stain chitin in cell walls and septa, or with DAPI, to visualize nuclei (Fig 5). In the orf19.3456Δ mutants, septa were only detectable between yeast cells that remained attached to one another, but no septa were visible in the long filaments (Fig 5A). While aberrantly shaped yeast cells of the orf19.3456Δ mutants often contained multiple nuclei, nuclear staining became diffuse and extended in the long filaments, indicating that the mutants were defective in nuclear segregation and distribution (Fig 5B). The pseudohyphae of the orf19.5376Δ mutants showed no or mislocalized chitin at the constrictions between cells, pointing to a defect in septum formation (Fig 5A) that resulted in some cells having no or multiple nuclei (Fig 5B, compare with serum-induced wild-type hyphae in S5 Fig). The M7 control strains that retained a wild-type allele after excision of the FLP-deletable gene copy behaved like the parental strain SC5314 (S6 Fig). Altogether, these results indicate that both orf19.3456Δ and orf19.5376Δ mutants have severe cytokinesis defects that ultimately result in cell death.

Fig 5. orf19.3456Δ and orf19.5376Δ mutants have cytokinesis defects.

Fig 5

YCB-BSA-YE overnight cultures of the wild-type strain SC5314 and the conditional M6 mutants were diluted 1:100 in YPD medium and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the cultures were taken after 12 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS and stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B). Cells were imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy.

The kinase activity of the proteins encoded by orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 is essential for viability

To investigate if the essential function of the proteins encoded by orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 depends on their predicted kinase activity, we generated strains that after loss of the FLP-deletable wild-type allele retained a mutated, “kinase-dead” allele at the endogenous locus (see materials and methods and S1 Table). These strains behaved like the conditional null mutants; they could not generate colonies after the deletion of the wild-type allele (S7A Fig) and had the same terminal phenotype as the null mutants (S6-S7 Videos and S7B Fig). We confirmed that the mutated proteins were produced by introducing 3xHA-tagged wild-type and kinase-dead alleles at the endogenous locus into strains with an additional wild-type allele (to ensure viability). Western blotting showed that wild-type and kinase-dead proteins were produced at comparable levels (S7C Fig). Furthermore, HA-tagging did not detectably compromise protein function, since replacement of the remaining wild-type allele in the heterozygous M2 mutants by a 3xHA-tagged allele did not affect growth (S7D Fig). These results provide evidence that the kinase activity of the predicted protein kinases encoded by orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 is essential for viability in the C. albicans wild-type strain SC5314.

orf19.5376 encodes a functional homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Elm1 that regulates septin localization and cytokinesis

The protein kinase encoded by orf19.5376 is the closest C. albicans homolog of S. cerevisiae Elm1, which has a redundant role with two other kinases, Sak1 and its paralog Tos3, in the activation of Snf1, a protein kinase that is required for adaptation to glucose limitation and utilization of alternative carbon sources [19–21]. In C. albicans, Snf1 phosphorylation in its activation loop is largely abolished in sak1Δ mutants, indicating that orf19.5376 cannot compensate for the loss of Sak1 and does not have a significant, if any, role in Snf1 activation [3]. However, Elm1 has additional functions in the yeast cell cycle. It is localized at the bud neck where it controls the assembly of septin filaments into the hourglass structure and their reorganization into the double ring structure at the division site; absence of Elm1 results in a mitotic delay [22–26]. S. cerevisiae elm1Δ mutants display a highly elongated cell morphology and, in some genetic backgrounds, constitutive pseudohyphal growth, because the cells remain attached to each other after cytokinesis [27]. These phenotypes resemble those of C. albicans orf19.5376Δ mutants (Fig 4 and S3 Video). To study orf19.5376 function further, we tested if the orf19.5376Δ mutant phenotype could also be brought about by auxin-inducible protein depletion [28], and possibly faster than by forced gene deletion. To this aim, the remaining wild-type orf19.5376 allele in the two independently generated heterozygous M2 mutants was fused with the AID* cassette (see materials and methods). Log-phase cells of the resulting strains were treated with 1 µM of the auxin analog 5-Ad-IAA and samples were taken at different time points for detection of the tagged proteins by Western blotting. Fig 6A shows that the degron-tagged kinase, which can be detected with an anti-HA antibody, was successfully removed within 15 min of treatment. To determine the phenotypic consequences of protein depletion, cells grown in YPD liquid medium were transferred to YPD agar containing 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and observed by video microscopy. As can be seen in S8 Video and Fig 6B, the cells exhibited the same pseudohyphal phenotype as the induced gene deletion mutants, only that it was induced more rapidly, presumably because of the more immediate effect of protein depletion (identically treated, untagged control cells are shown in S9 Video). Furthermore, staining of cells grown in YPD liquid medium showed that auxin-induced protein depletion resulted in the same defects in septum formation and nuclear distribution as seen in the gene deletion mutants (S8 Fig). This was further corroborated by monitoring septin localization in cells containing a GFP-tagged CDC3 allele. In contrast to auxin-treated wild-type cells, which showed the typical septin ring between mother and daughter cells as well as the double ring in large-budded cells (S9 Fig), Cdc3 was largely absent at the restrictions between cells and relocalized to the pseudohyphal tip in the auxin-induced mutants (Fig 6C), similar to the mislocalization of septins in S. cerevisiae elm1Δ mutants [22,26,29,30]. For comparison, serum-induced hyphae of the wild-type strain showed normal septa, nuclei distribution, and septin rings (S10 Fig). Together, these observations demonstrate that the kinase encoded by orf19.5376 controls septin localization and cytokinesis in C. albicans, indicating that it is indeed a functional ortholog of S. cerevisiae Elm1. However, while S. cerevisiae elm1Δ mutants are viable, the morphologial defects caused by the absence of this kinase are much more severe and eventually lethal in C. albicans.

Fig 6. Phenotypic consequences of auxin-induced degradation of the orf19.5376-encoded kinase.

Fig 6

(A) Strains containing a single orf19.5376 copy fused to the AID* cassette were grown to log phase in YPD medium. Samples were taken before and at the indicated time points after addition of 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and analyzed by Western blotting. The degron-tagged kinase was detected with an anti-HA antibody and the Tir protein with an anti-Myc antibody. (B) YPD-grown cells containing the degron-tagged kinase were transfered to a 35-mm culture dish, covered with YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA agar, and incubated at 30°C. Images were taken every 5 min for 24 h with a Leica DMI6000 microscope (S8 Video). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points. (C) A YPD overnight culture of the auxin-inducible mutants containing a GFP-tagged CDC3 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with paraformaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with DAPI, and imaged by DIC (left panels) and fluorescence microscopy (middle panels). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points, including overlays of the DIC and fluorescence micrographs (right panels).

The protein kinase encoded by orf19.3456 is part of a septation initiation network in C. albicans

The protein kinase encoded by orf19.3456 does not have an ortholog in S. cerevisiae, but one of its homologs in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is the protein serine/threonine kinase Sid1, a component of the septation initiation network (SIN) that coordinates cytokinesis with chromosome segregation [31,32]. The SIN includes a kinase cascade, Cdc7-Sid1-Sid2, that is positioned at the spindle pole body (SPB) by the GTPase Spg1. The SIN becomes active at the new SPB (by the recruitment of Sid1) when the mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) is inactivated in late mitosis. Under restrictive conditions, sid1 as well as other sin mutants undergo nuclear division without septation and form elongated, multinucleate cells that eventually lyse [31]. A related signaling pathway in S. cerevisiae is the mitotic exit network (MEN), which promotes exit from mitosis by triggering the release of the phosphatase Cdc14 from the nucleolus to antagonize the mitotic CDKs [33,34]. The MEN contains homologs of many of the SIN components, including the Spg1 homolog Tem1, the Cdc7 homolog Cdc15, and the Sid2 homologs Dbf2/Dbf20, but it lacks a Sid1 homolog and Dbf2 is directly activated by Cdc15 [35]. S. cerevisiae mutants lacking MEN proteins arrest in late anaphase and fail to inactivate CDKs and initiate cytokinesis [34].

Sid1 has comparable homology to several C. albicans kinases, not only that encoded by orf19.3456 (62.1% similarity in the kinase domain), e.g., Kic1 (64.1%), Cla4 (60.6%), Sps1 (58.5%), or Cdc15 (58.1%). However, the orf19.3456Δ mutant phenotype (multinucleate cells, hyphae without septa) suggested that the encoded kinase could be a Sid1 ortholog and that C. albicans, despite being a budding yeast like S. cerevisiae, possesses a signaling pathway that is more related to the SIN of S. pombe than to the MEN of S. cerevisiae. We tested if the orf19.3456Δ mutant phenotype could be reproduced by auxin-induced protein depletion and replaced the remaining wild-type orf19.3456 allele in the heterozygous M2 mutants by an AID*-tagged copy. Fig 7A shows that the degron-tagged protein became undetectable within 15 min after the addition of 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA to log-phase cells. Similarly to the gene deletion mutants, the cells were unable to grow as budding yeasts and instead formed hyphae without constrictions, and this phenotype was rapidly induced upon protein depletion (S10 Video and Fig 7B). The video also shows that the hyphae originated from buds that had become larger than their mother cells (identically treated, untagged control cells are shown in S11 Video). Moreover, the defect in septum formation and a sometimes multinucleate nature of aseptate hyphae were evident in these mutants (S11 Fig). In cells containing a GFP-tagged CDC3 allele, the septin became mislocalized soon after the auxin-induced protein depletion and was either absent in hyphae or found at apparently random sites without forming a ring structure Fig 7C).

Fig 7. Phenotypic consequences of auxin-induced degradation of the orf19.3456-encoded kinase.

Fig 7

(A) Strains containing a single orf19.3456 copy fused to the AID* cassette were grown to log phase in YPD medium. Samples were taken before and at the indicated time points after addition of 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HA and anti-Myc antibodies. (B) YPD-grown cells containing the degron-tagged kinase were transfered to a 35-mm culture dish, covered with YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA agar, and incubated at 30°C. Images were taken every 5 min for 24 h with a Leica DMI6000 microscope (S10 Video). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points. (C) A YPD overnight culture of the auxin-inducible mutants containing a GFP-tagged CDC3 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with paraformaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with DAPI, and imaged by DIC (left panels) and fluorescence microscopy (middle panels). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points, including overlays of the DIC and fluorescence micrographs (right panels). Note that the hyphae were deformed after the fixation and centrifugation steps (compare with the live hyphae in (B).

Several components of the MEN/SIN pathway have already been studied in C. albicans and, in analogy to S. cerevisiae, described as parts of the MEN [36–39]. Indeed, the GTPase Tem1, the kinases Cdc15 and Dbf2, and the phosphatase Cdc14 were thought to constitute all key components of the MEN signaling cascade in C. albicans [36]. TEM1, CDC15, and DBF2 are essential genes, and their functions have been investigated by expressing them under the control of repressible promoters. The tem1 and cdc15 knock-down mutants formed hyphae without septa [36,39], similar to our orf19.3456 mutants. In contrast, dbf2 knock-down mutants showed a different phenotype. They were unable to make septa, but instead of forming hyphae produced chains of cells that failed to separate after promoter shut-off [38]. Cells expressing an HA-tagged DBF2, whose function was partially compromised, exhibited an even stronger phenotype under repressive conditions. They arrested as pairs of large budded cells without a septum after DNA replication and displayed a nuclear segregation defect due to improper mitotic spindle organization [38]. To investigate whether the orf19.3456-encoded kinase and the putative downstream kinase Dbf2 indeed have different functions in the C. albicans cell cycle or the different mutant phenotypes were caused by the experimental approaches (gene repression versus gene deletion/protein depletion), we generated auxin-inducible dbf2 mutants of the wild-type strain SC5314. Dbf2-depleted cells exhibited the same phenotype as the orf19.3456 mutants; they formed aseptate hyphae that often contained two elongated nuclei, suggesting a nuclear segregation defect after they had entered a new cell cycle (Fig 8 and S12 Video; auxin-treated, untagged control cells are shown in S13 Video and S12 Fig). These results suggest that Tem1, Cdc15, the orf193456-encoded kinase, and Dbf2 act in the same signaling pathway and their loss results in the same terminal phenotype.

Fig 8. Phenotypic consequences of auxin-induced Dbf2 depletion.

Fig 8

(A) Strains containing a single DBF2 copy fused to the AID* cassette were grown to log phase in YPD medium. Samples were taken before and at the indicated time points after addition of 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HA and anti-Myc antibodies. (B) YPD-grown cells containing the degron-tagged Dbf2 were transfered to a 35-mm culture dish, covered with YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA agar, and incubated at 30°C. Images were taken every 5 min for 24 h with a Leica DMI6000 microscope (S12 Video). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points. (C, D) A YPD overnight culture of the auxin-inducible dbf2 mutants was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (C) or DAPI (D), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points.

orf19.193 encodes a putative regulatory subunit of the orf19.3456-encoded kinase

Sid1 of S. pombe is bound to a regulatory subunit that is required for its activity [31]. To identify potential interaction partners of the orf19.3456-encoded kinase, we performed co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) experiments with derivatives of strain SC5314 in which both orf19.3456 alleles were HA-tagged. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry identified 105 proteins (including the tagged kinase itself) that were significantly enriched in immunoprecipitates of the tagged strains compared to the untagged wild-type control strain (S2 Table; extended dataset provided in S3 Table). Among those, one protein stood out because of its > 1,000-fold increased abundance. It is encoded by the putative essential orf19.193, the function of which is unknown. However, according to the Candida Genome Database, the protein belongs to the same family as Cdc14, the regulatory subunit of Sid1 in S. pombe (not to be confounded with the phosphatase Cdc14 of S. cerevisiae and C. albicans), and a subsequent BLAST search of the C. albicans genome with S. pombe Cdc14 identified orf19.193 as the best hit. We confirmed the binding of the orf19.193-encoded protein to the orf19.3456-encoded kinase in Co-IP experiments with strains containing Myc-tagged orf19.3456 and/or HA-tagged orf19.193 (see S4 Table). Fig 9 shows that the orf19.193-encoded protein was specifically immunoprecipitated by the Myc-tagged kinase (lanes 5–8), but not in strains with the untagged kinase (lanes 1 and 2).

Fig 9. The orf19.193-encoded protein specifically interacts with the orf19.3456-encoded kinase.

Fig 9

Strains with or without Myc-tagged orf19.3456 and HA-tagged orf19.193 were grown to log phase in YPD at 30°C. Protein extracts were prepared as described in materials and methods and immunoprecipitated with an anti-Myc antibody. The immunoprecipitated orf19.3456-encoded kinase was detected by Western blotting with an anti-Myc antibody, and the co-immunoprecipitated orf19.193-encoded protein with an anti-HA antibody (top panels, IP). Tagged proteins in the input samples were detected with anti-HA and anti-Myc antibodies (bottom panels, input). Detection of tubulin with an anti-tubulin antibody served as loading control for the input samples. Both independently generated series of strains were used for the experiment.

We reasoned that, if orf19.193 encodes a regulatory subunit that is essential for the activity of the orf19.3456-encoded kinase, orf19.193 mutants should exhibit the same phenotype as orf19.3456 mutants. Either of the two orf19.193 alleles could be deleted in the wild-type strain SC5314, but no homozygous mutants were obtained among 24 second-round transformants of the two types of heterozygous mutants, providing further evidence that orf19.193 is an essential gene. We therefore generated auxin-inducible conditional mutants in which the remaining wild-type orf19.193 allele was fused with the AID* cassette. Strikingly, following depletion of the degron-tagged protein, the cells grew as aseptate hyphae containing elongated nuclear masses, just like the orf19.3456 mutants (Fig 10 and S14 Video; auxin-treated, untagged control cells are shown in S15 Video and S13 Fig). This phenotype provided additional evidence that C. albicans regulates cytokinesis via a SIN pathway that includes the orf19.3456-encoded kinase and its regulatory subunit in addition to the upstream kinase Cdc15 and the downstream kinase Dbf2.

Fig 10. Phenotypic consequences of auxin-induced degradation of the orf19.193-encoded protein.

Fig 10

(A) Strains containing a single orf19.193 copy fused to the AID* cassette were grown to log phase in YPD medium. Samples were taken before and at the indicated time points after addition of 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HA and anti-Myc antibodies. (B) YPD-grown cells containing the degron-tagged orf19.193 were transfered to a 35-mm culture dish, covered with YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA agar, and incubated at 30°C. Images were taken every 5 min for 24 h with a Leica DMI6000 microscope (S14 Video). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points. (C, D) A YPD overnight culture of the auxin-inducible orf19.193 mutants was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (C) or DAPI (D), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points.

Discussion

The results presented in this work illustrate that inducible gene deletion is a powerful method to determine gene essentiality in C. albicans. We found that the protein kinases Bud32, Ctk1, Rio1, and Rio2 are not essential for viability of the wild-type strain SC5314, but bud32Δ, ctk1Δ, rio1Δ, and rio2Δ mutants grew very slowly, explaining why homozygous deletion mutants for these genes were not recovered in our previous efforts [2] and why no insertions in these genes were found in a genome-wide in vivo transposon mutagenesis study with a haploid C. albicans strain [9]. A particular advantage of the induced gene deletion is that it occurs in almost every individual cell of the conditional mutants, resulting in a population of independent null mutants whose growth can be compared by plating for single colonies immediately after the gene deletion. The small size of all colonies generated by individual bud32Δ, ctk1Δ, rio1Δ, and rio2Δ cells after prolonged incubation demonstrated that absence of the corresponding kinases results in poor growth even under optimal conditions (see Fig 2). In this respect, we note that Kramara et al. [14] did not observe a fitness defect of ctk1Δ and rio1Δ mutants generated in strain SN250, an auxotrophic derivative of SC5314, whereas our induced ctk1Δ and rio1Δ deletion mutants exhibited severely reduced growth (Figs 2, S2), indicating that a suppressor mutation may have allowed normal growth of the former mutants. The occurrence of suppressor mutations that enable (normal) growth of otherwise nonviable or poorly growing mutants is indeed an issue that must be kept in mind, especially when rare homozygous mutants are obtained using traditional gene deletion methods. It also became evident when we recovered ptk2Δ mutants after the induced gene deletion. Colonies of highly variable size appeared after prolonged incubation at 37°C, indicating that the ptk2Δ mutants remained viable but had to acquire secondary mutations in order to be able to propagate. This was verified for several independent ptk2Δ mutants that contained suppressor mutations in the candidate gene PMA1 and grew well after restreaking. We conclude that PTK2 is an essential gene in C. albicans wild-type strains (at least in the reference strain SC5314), because it is required for the activity of the plasma membrane ATPase Pma1. Other mutations that support growth of cells lacking Ptk2 may also rescue Pma1 activity to some degree, but this was not further investigated. Blankenship et al. generated viable ptk2 transposon insertion mutants by the UAU method, but the transposon was inserted behind the kinase domain, which might also explain the viability of these mutants [6].

In addition to firmly establishing that the uncharacterized orf19.5376 and orf19.3456 are indeed essential for viablity in the C. albicans wild-type strain SC5314, the analysis of the terminal phenotypes of the induced deletion mutants also provided strong evidence that the encoded kinases are functional homologs of S. cerevisiae Elm1 and S. pombe Sid1, and we suggest to rename these ORFs ELM1 and SID1 (and orf19.193 SRS1, for Sid1 regulatory subunit). In the case of orf19.5376 this may have seemed likely, because the encoded kinase is the closest Elm1 homolog in C. albicans. However, unlike Elm1 in S. cerevisiae, the kinase encoded by orf19.5376 has no detectable role in Snf1 activation, because it cannot compensate for the loss of Sak1 in C. albicans [3]. Furthermore, several previous studies have also indicated that orf19.5376 is essential in C. albicans [3,6,9,14], while S. cerevisiae elm1Δ mutants are viable. The phenotype of orf19.5376Δ mutants, which was mirrored by auxin-induced protein depletion, demonstrates that the encoded kinase has retained the known functions of Elm1 in septin organization and cytokinesis, and its loss is lethal in C. albicans, indicating that it cannot at least partially be substituted by other kinases involved in these processes. Interestingly, ELM1 is not essential in C. auris and its deletion in several different strains resulted in constitutive pseudohyphal growth [40,41], similar to the phenotype of some S. cerevisiae elm1Δ mutants and the C. albicans orf19.5376 mutants.

A discovery that came out of our analysis of essential kinase mutants is that C. albicans possesses a SIN pathway comprising the three kinases Cdc15, Sid1, and Dbf2 instead of a MEN pathway with only two kinases, Cdc15 and Dbf2, as was previously thought. While the direct relationships between these kinases have not yet been experimentally addressed in C. albicans, the lethal cytokinesis defect of all mutants lacking one of the three kinases indicates that Cdc15 cannot bypass Sid1 for activation of the downstream kinase Dbf2. One notable difference between the phenotypes of previously reported tem1 and cdc15 knock-down mutants as compared with our orf19.3456 mutants is that the former showed a mitotic arrest, resulting in cells with two nuclei that did not enter subsequent rounds of nuclear division [36,39]. In contrast, we observed multinucleate cells in orf19.3456 mutants, similar to what has been described for S. pombe sid1 mutants [31]. However, the nuclear bodies in orf19.3456 mutant hyphae were often extended, pointing to a mitotic delay from which some cells eventually could escape (Figs 5, S11 Fig). While it is possible that loss of Tem1 and Cdc15 result in a stronger defect in mitotic exit than does loss of Sid1 and Dbf2, the phenotypic differences may also be due to the fact that depletion of Tem1 and Cdc15 required 6 h and 12 h, and hyphal growth began only at 8 h and 20 h, respectively, after promoter shut-off in the repressible mutants [36,39], whereas auxin-induced protein depletion occurred within minutes in our mutants and hyphal growth started much earlier than in the tem1 and cdc15 knock-down mutants (Figs 7, 8, 10; S10 Video, S12 Video, S14 Video), which may have allowed detection of additional nuclear division events. Cells with three or more nuclei have also been observed in dbf2 knock-down mutants [38].

Differences between the MEN in S. cerevisiae and its counterpart in C. albicans have been noted before, as the terminal phosphatase Cdc14, which is essential in S. cerevisae and required for inactivation of the mitotic CDKs, is not essential in C. albicans and its primary role is the induction of cell separation after cytokinesis [37]. Furthermore, in C. albicans Cdc14 is degraded at the end of mitosis instead of being sequestered into the nucleolus [37]. Dbf2 has been identified as a Cdc14 interaction partner in C. albicans [42], indicating that Dbf2 might phosphorylate Cdc14 to promote its release from the nucleus into the cytoplasm, as in S. cerevisiae [43]. However, the SIN must have additional targets, because all three core kinases as well as the upstream GTPase Tem1 are essential for viability, whereas Cdc14 is dispensable.

The SIN pathway regulates cytokinesis also in filamentous fungi, although its precise functions differ from that in S. pombe [44–46]. In Neurospora crassa, phosphorylation of the Sid2 homolog DBF-2 by SID-1 has been demonstrated, indicating that Dbf2/Sid2 homologs are phosphorylated by Sid1 homologs instead of homologs of the upstream kinase Cdc15/Cdc7 in fungi with a tripartite kinase cascade [45]. The absence of a known Sid1 homolog in budding yeasts as opposed to fission yeast and filamentous fungi had been attributed to their morphological differences, but a Sid1 homolog has recently been described also in the methylotrophic yeast Ogataea polymorpha [47]. Our finding that orf19.3456 encodes a functional Sid1 homolog, combined with the fact that orf19.3456 orthologs are present in other Candida and related species (http://www.candidagenome.org), supports the conclusion by Maekawa et al. [47] that the SIN pathway is the ancestral type and Sid1 homologs have been lost in the S. cerevisiae lineage.

Materials and methods

Strains and growth conditions

The C. albicans strains used in this study are listed in S1 Table. All strains were stored as frozen stocks with 17.2% (v/v) glycerol at -80°C and subcultured on YPD agar plates (10 g yeast extract, 20 g peptone, 20 g glucose, 15 g agar per liter) at 30°C. Strains were routinely grown in YPD liquid medium at 30°C in a shaking incubator. For the selection of transformants, 200 µg/ml nourseothricin (Werner Bioagents, Jena, Germany) or 1 mg/ml hygromycin B was added to YPD agar plates. To obtain nourseothricin-sensitive derivatives in which the SAT1 flipper cassette was excised by FLP-mediated recombination, transformants were grown overnight in YCB-BSA-YE medium (23.4 g yeast carbon base, 4 g bovine serum albumin, 2 g yeast extract per liter, pH 4.0) without selective pressure to induce the SAP2 promoter controlling caFLP expression. Appropriate dilutions were plated on YPD agar plates and grown for 2 days at 30°C. Individual colonies were picked and streaked on YPD plates as well as on YPD plates with 100 µg/ml nourseothricin to confirm sensitivity. Specific growth conditions for particular experiments are described in the text and figure legends.

Strain constructions

C. albicans strains were transformed by electroporation as described previously [48]. To generate FLP-deletable cassettes containing functional copies of the protein kinase genes, the coding region and flanking sequences of the genes were amplified from genomic DNA of strain SC5314 with the primers listed in S4 Table and substituted for the SNF1 gene in the previously described pSNF1ex3 [11], resulting in plasmids pBUD32ex3, pCTK1ex3, pKSP1ex3, pPTK2ex3, pRIO1ex3, pRIO2ex3, p3456ex3, and p5376ex3. The cassettes were excised from the vector backbone and integrated at the ADH1 locus in the corresponding heterozygous M2 mutants [2] to obtain M3 mutants (see Fig 1 and S1 Table). The previously described gene deletion cassettes [2,3] were then used to delete the second endogenous alleles in these strains to generate M4 mutants. These strains were grown overnight in YCB-BSA-YE medium to induce FLP-mediated excision of the SAT1 flipper cassette, resulting in M5 mutants which contained only the FLP-deletable gene copy. The insert from plasmid pSAP2FL1 [11] was used to integrate the ecaFLP gene under control of the SAP2-1 promoter into the SAP2-1 allele of M5 and M3 mutants to generate the conditional M6 mutants and the M7 control strains, respectively. Induction of ecaFLP expression by passage in YCB-BSA-YE medium resulted in the loss of the FLP-deletable gene copy. When the null mutants were viable (bud32Δ, ctk1Δ, rio1Δ, rio2Δ), corresponding M8 mutants (from M6) and M9 control strains (from M7) were retained. An exception were the KSP1 mutants for which two types of derivatives of the M4 strains were obtained. In some clones, both the SAT1 flipper cassette and the FLP-deletable ectopic KSP1 copy were deleted, and these were kept as ksp1Δ null mutants (SCKSP1M5). Others had excised only the SAT1 flipper cassette but retained the ectopic KSP1 copy, and these were used as control strains (SCKSP1M6).

The kinase-dead orf19.3456K41R allele was amplified in two parts from genomic DNA of strain SC5314 with the primer pairs 3456.01/3456.07 and 3456.06/3456.05, followed by a fusion PCR with primers 3456.01 and 3456.05; the overlapping primers 3456.07 and 3456.06 changed the lysine codon AAA (positions +121 to +123 in orf19.3456) into the arginine codon AGA. The PCR product was digested with SacI/SacII and substituted for the upstream flanking sequence in the orf19.3456 deletion cassette to obtain p3456K41R. The kinase-dead orf19.5376K65R allele was generated in analogous fashion with the primer pairs 5376.01/5376.13 and 5376.12/5376.11, thereby changing the lysine codon AAA (positions +193 to +195 in orf19.5376) into the arginine codon AGA. The PCR product was digested with SacI/SacII and substituted for the upstream flanking sequence in the orf19.5376 deletion cassette to obtain p5376K65R. The inserts from these plasmids were integrated into one of the inactivated endogenous alleles of the corresponding M5 mutants to generate M8 mutants, followed by recycling of the SAT1 flipper cassette to produce M9 mutants. The insert from plasmid pSAP2FL1 was then used to integrate the ecaFLP gene under control of the SAP2-1 promoter into the SAP2-1 allele to generate M10 mutants.

To construct 3xHA-tagged orf19.3456 and orf19.3456K41R alleles, their upstream and coding sequences were amplified with primers 3456.01 and 3456.08; the latter primer introduced a KasI site, encoding a Gly-Ala linker, instead of the stop codon. The PCR products were digested with SacI/KasI and cloned together with a KasI-SacII fragment from pMIG1H3 [17], encoding three copies of the HA epitope followed by a stop codon and the ACT1 transcription termination sequence, into the SacI/SacII-digested p3456K41R to obtain p3456H1 and p3456HK41R, respectively. 3xHA-tagged orf19.5376 and orf19.5376K65R alleles were generated in an analogous way using primers 5376.01 and 5376.14 to obtain plasmids p5376H1 and p5376HK65R. The inserts from these plasmids were integrated into one of the inactivated endogenous alleles of the corresponding M5 mutants to generate M11 and M13 mutants, followed by recycling of the SAT1 flipper cassette to produce M12 and M14 mutants. The inserts from p3456H1 and p5376H1 were also inserted into the remaining wild-type orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 alleles of the M2 mutants, followed by recycling of the SAT1 flipper cassette to generate H2 strains expressing a single 3xHA-tagged copy these genes from their own promoter. Subsequent integration of the 3xHA-tagged orf19.3456 into the already deleted second allele resulted in H4 strains.

To generate an orf19.193 deletion cassette, the orf19.193 upstream and downstream regions were amplified with the primer pairs 193.09/193/10 and 193.11/193.12, respectively, and cloned on both sides of the SAT1 flipper cassette in plasmid pSFS5 [5]. Replacement of one of the orf19.193 alleles in strain SC5314 by the orf19.193 deletion cassette, followed by recycling of the SAT1 flipper, generated heterozygous M2 mutants.

To obtain auxin-inducible orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 mutants, the AID* cassette from plasmid pHLP728 (a kind gift from Mark Hall) was amplified in two parts with the primer pairs AID01/AID02 and AID03/AID04. The PCR products were digested with KasI/NsiI and NsiI/XhoI, respectively, and, after fusion at the introduced NsiI sites, inserted into the KasI/XhoI-digested p3456H1 and p5376H1 to generate p3456AID1 and p5376AID1, respectively. The inserts from these plasmids were used to tag the remaining wild-type orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 alleles in the corresponding M2 mutants with the AID* cassette. The resulting SC3456AID1 and SC5376AID1 strains express single orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 alleles, respectively, containing a C-terminal fusion to the auxin-inducible degron, the OsTIR1 gene under control of the C. albicans ACT1 promoter, and a nourseothricin resistance marker [a modified version of the caSAT1 marker generated in the Hall lab [28]]. Auxin-inducible dbf2 and orf19.193 mutants were generated in an analogous fashion. The 3’ part of the DBF2 coding region was amplified with primers DBF2.12 and DBF2.06 and the PCR product digested with SacI/KasI and cloned together with the KasI-XhoI fragment from p3456AID1 containing the AID* cassette into the SacI/XhoI-digested pDBF2M1 [2] to generate pDBF2AID1. The 3’ part of orf19.193 was amplified with primers 193.13/193.02 and the orf19.193 downstream region with primers 193.11 and 193.12. The PCR products were digested with SacI/KasI and XhoI/ApaI, respectively, and substituted for the orf19.3456 flanking sequences in p3456AID1 to obtain p193AID1. The inserts from the latter plasmids were used to tag the remaining wild-type DBF2 and orf19.193 alleles in the corresponding M2 mutants with the AID* cassette.

To facilitate HA-, Myc- and GFP-tagging in nourseothricin- or hygromycin-resistant strains, the HygB marker from plasmid pGRP2M2 [49] was first amplified in two parts with the primer pairs HygB-1/HygB-8 and HygB-9/HygB-2, followed by a fusion PCR with primers HygB-1 and HygB-2. The complementary primers HygB-8 and HygB-9 introduced a silent T285G substitution that removed an internal SacI site. The PCR product was digested with XhoI/PstI and cloned in the vector pBluescript II KS to obtain plasmid pHygB. A fragment comprising a KasI linker, three tandem copies of the Myc epitope sequence followed by a stop codon, and the ACT1 transcription termination sequence was amplified from plasmid pKIS1Myc3 [50] with primers Myc3KasI and ACT1TSalI, digested with ApaI/SalI, and cloned in the ApaI/XhoI-digested pHygB to generate pMyc3-HygB. Furthermore, a shorter version of the caSAT1 marker (without the ACT1 intron) was obtained by amplifying the caSAT1 gene in two parts with the primer pairs ACT1P1/ACT1P2 and SAT9/SAT10, followed by a fusion PCR with primers ACT1P1 and SAT10. The PCR product was digested with XhoI/PstI and cloned in the vector pBluescript II KS to generate pSAT5 with the modified caSAT2 marker. A fragment comprising a KasI linker, three tandem copies of the Myc epitope sequence followed by a stop codon, and the ACT1 transcription termination sequence was amplified as described above and cloned in the ApaI/XhoI-digested pSAT5 to generate pMyc3-SAT2.

To generate a 3xMyc-tagged orf19.3456, the orf19.3456 downstream region was amplified with primers 3456.09 and 3456.04. The PCR product was digested with PstI/ApaI and cloned together with the KasI/PstI digested 3xMyc-ACT1T-caSAT2 fragment from pMyc3-SAT2 into the KasI/ApaI-digested p3456H1. The insert from this plasmid was used to replace the remaining orf19.3456 wild-type allele in the heterozygous M2 mutants as well as one of the orf19.3456 wild-type alleles in the strains containing a single HA-tagged orf19.193 allele (described below). To generate a 3xMyc-tagged orf19.193, a part of the orf19.193 coding sequence was amplified with the primers 193.01 and 193.02; the latter primer introduced a KasI site, encoding a Gly-Ala linker, instead of the stop codon. The orf19.193 downstream region was amplified with primers 193.03 and 193.04. The PCR products were digested with ApaI/KasI and PstI/SacI, respectively, and cloned together with the KasI-PstI fragment from pMyc3-HygB in the ApaI/SacI-digested vector pBluescript II KS to generate p193Myc3. A 3xHA-ACT1T fragment was amplified from pMIG1H3 with the primers MIG1HAfwd and ACT1TSalI, digested with KasI/SalI, and cloned together with the XhoI-PstI HygB-Fragment from pHygB in the Kas/PstI-digested p193Myc3 to obtain p193H1, thereby exchanging the 3xMyc tag for a 3xHA tag. The insert from p193H1 was used to replace the remaining orf19.193 wild-type allele in the heterozygous M2 mutants as well as one of the orf19.193 wild-type alleles in the strains containing a single Myc-tagged orf19.3456 allele.

For GFP-tagging, a fragment containing GFP and the ACT1 transcription termination sequence was amplified from plasmid pYOR1G1 [51] with the primers GFP28 and ACT1TSalI. The PCR product was digested with KasI/SalI and used to replace the 3xMyc tag in pMyc3-HygB by GFP, yielding pGFP-HygB. To construct a CDC3-GFP fusion, a part of the CDC3 coding sequence was amplified with the primers CDC3.01 and CDC3.02; the latter primer introduced a KasI site, encoding a Gly-Ala linker, instead of the stop codon. The CDC3 downstream region was amplified with primers CDC3.03 and CDC3.04. The PCR products were digested with ApaI/KasI and PstI/SacI, respectively, and cloned together with the KasI-PstI fragment from pGFP-HygB in the vector pBluescript II KS to generate pCDC3G1. The insert from this plasmid was used to replace one of the endogenous CDC3 alleles by a GFP-tagged copy in the wild type and the auxin-inducible orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 mutants. In all cases two independent series of mutants (A and B) were generated (see S1 Table).

Isolation of genomic DNA and Southern hybridization

Genomic DNA from C. albicans strains was isolated as described previously [4]. The DNA was digested with appropriate restriction enzymes, separated on a 1% agarose gel, transferred by vacuum blotting onto a nylon membrane, and fixed by UV crosslinking. Southern hybridization with enhanced chemiluminescence-labeled probes was performed with the Amersham ECL Direct Nucleic Acid Labelling and Detection System (Cytiva) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.

Determination of induced gene deletion efficiency

Conditional deletion mutants and control strains were grown overnight at 30°C in YCB-BSA-YE medium to induce ecaFLP expression from the SAP2 promoter. Tenfold dilution series were prepared and the 10-2 dilutions used to determine the total number of cells/ml in a counting chamber (Thoma neu). The number of viable cells (CFUs) was determined by plating 100 µl of the 10-3 dilutions of the conditional mutants and 100 µl of the 10-6 dilutions of the control strains on YPD plates. The number of colonies was determined after two days of growth at 30°C.

Time lapse microscopy

YPD overnight cultures of the strains were diluted 1:5 in water. Five µl of the diluted cell suspension was transferred to an IBIDI µ-Dish 35 mm and covered with a previously prepared YPD agar pad, without or with 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA (TCI). The µ-Dish was placed in a Leica DMI6000 microscope equipped with a climate chamber, prewarmed to an ambient temperature of 30°C. DIC images were acquired at 5 min intervals for 24 h. Image processing was carried out with FIJI software [52].

Fluorescence microscopy

For cell wall and nuclei staining, cells from liquid cultures were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and washed with PBS. Fixed cells were stained with 1 µg/ml calcofluor white or 5 µg/ml DAPI. For localization of GFP-tagged Cdc3, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed with PBS, and stained with 1 µg/ml calcofluor white or 5 µg/ml DAPI. Cells were imaged with a Leica DMI6000 microscope using appropriate filters for fluorescence detection. Z-stacks were acquired over 5 µm in 0.5 µm increments and deconvolved using LAS X software. Additional image processing was carried out with FIJI software [52].

Western blotting

Overnight cultures of the strains were diluted to an OD600 of 0.4 in fresh YPD and grown for 5 h at 30°C. Cells were collected by centrifugation, washed with ice-cold water, and resuspended in 300 µl breaking buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% [v/v] Triton X-100, cOmplete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail and PhosStop Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail [Roche]). An equal volume of 0.5 mm acid-washed glass beads was added to each tube. Cells were mechanically disrupted on a FastPrep-24 cell-homogenizer (MP Biomedicals) with three 40 s pulses, with 5 min on ice between each pulse. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C, the supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was quantified using the Bradford protein assay. Equal amounts of protein of each sample were mixed with one volume of 2 x Laemmli buffer, heated for 5 min at 95°C, and separated on an SDS-polyacrylamide (8% or 10%) gel. Separated proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane with a mini-Protean System (Bio-Rad). To detect HA-tagged proteins, membranes were blocked with 5% milk in TBST and incubated overnight with rat monoclonal anti-HA-peroxidase antibody, clone 3F10 (Roche). For the detection of tubulin, membranes were blocked with 5% milk in TBST and incubated overnight at 4°C with rat anti-tubulin alpha antibody MCA 78G (Bio-Rad), washed with TBST, and then incubated with rabbit anti-rat HRP-conjugated antibody STAR21B (Bio-Rad). Myc-tagged proteins were detected with anti-Myc (71D10) rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-rabbit HRP G-21234 (Invitrogen) as secondary antibody. To reprobe the immunoblots, membranes were incubated in stripping buffer (0.2 M glycine, 0.1% SDS, 1% Tween 20, pH 2.2), and washed in PBS and TBST before blocking with 5% milk. Signals were generated with the ECL chemiluminescence detection system (Cytiva) and captured with the ImageQuant LAS 4000 imaging system (Cytiva).

Co-immunoprecipitation

For Co-IP of proteins with the HA-tagged orf19.3456-encoded kinase, cells were grown to log phase in YPD and treated for 1 h with 1 mM DSP (CAS 57757-57-0) at room temperature. Crosslinking was stopped by adding Tris-HCl pH 7.4 to a final concentration of 50 mM and incubating for additional 15 min. The cells were then washed with ice-cold water and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cell extracts were obtained by grinding the cells using mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen. The powdered extracts were mixed with two volumes of IP-Buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 250 mM sodium citrate, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100) and centrifuged for 15 min (21,000 x g, 4°C).The supernatants were recovered, mixed with 100 µl anti-HA agarose beads (Pierce 26181, Thermo Scientific), and incubated for 1 h at 4°C with end-over-end rotation. The agarose beads were washed with IP-buffer, followed by three washes with PBS and a final wash with ultrapure water. Bound proteins were eluted with 50 µl 0.1% (v/v) TFA in 30% (v/v) aqueous acetonitrile. The elution step was repeated two additional times and the eluates were combined for a final volume of 150 µl. 10 µl of the eluates were dried in a SpeedVac, resuspended in 2x protein sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting using an anti-HA HRP-conjugated antibody. Three biological replicates of the tagged strains (two from the A strain and one from the B strain) and three biological replicates of the untagged control strain SC5314 were used for proteomic analysis.

For specific Co-IP of the HA-tagged orf19.193-encoded protein with the Myc-tagged orf19.3456-encoded kinase, cell extracts were prepared as described above. Supernatants were mixed with 100 µl anti-c-Myc agarose beads (Pierce 20168, Thermo Scientific) and incubated for 18 h at 4°C with end-over-end rotation. The agarose beads were washed with IP-buffer, followed by three washes with PBS, and bound proteins eluted with 50 µl of 2x protein sample buffer. Immunoprecipitated samples and corresponding input samples were analyzed by Western blotting as described above.

Proteomics

Tryptic digestion.

Co-IP eluates (35 µl of 0.1% TFA in 30/70 ACN/H2O, v/v) were evaporated to dryness in a vacuum concentrator (Eppendorf). Proteins were resolubilized in 50 µl of 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) in 50/50 trifluoroethanol (TFE)/H2O (v/v). Cysteine thiols were reduced and carbamidomethylated in one step for 30 min at 70°C by addition of each 1 µL of 500 mM TCEP (tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine) and 625 mM 2-chloroacetamide (CAA) per 50 µl sample. Samples were again evaporated to dryness and resolubilized in 50 µl of 100 mM TEAB in 5/95 TFE/H2O (v/v). Proteins were digested for 18 h at 37°C after addition of 1 µl of a 2 µg/µl Trypsin/Lys-C mix (in 50 mM acetic acid). Tryptic peptides were evaporated to dryness with a vacuum concentrator. Dried peptides were resolubilized in 30 µl 0.05% TFA and 2% ACN in water by pipetting up and down several times followed by 15 min ultrasonic bath treatment and Vortex homogenization. Finally, the peptides were filtered through 0.2 µm Ultrafree-MC hydrophilic PTFE filters (Merck-Millipore) for 15 min at 16,000 × g (8°C). The filtrate was transferred to HPLC vials.

LC-MS/MS analysis.

Injection volume was 6 µl. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on an Ultimate 3000 nano RSLC system connected to a Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer (both Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with FAIMS. Peptide trapping for 5 min on an Acclaim Pep Map 100 column (2 cm x 75 µm, 3 µm) at 5 µL/min was followed by separation on a µPACneo 110 column. Mobile phase gradient elution of eluent A (0.1% [v/v] formic acid in water) mixed with eluent B (0.1% [v/v] formic acid in 90/10 acetonitrile/water) was performed using the following gradient: 0 min at 4% B and 750 nl/min, 10 min at 9% B and 750 nl/min, 12 min at 9.5% B and 300 nl/min, 55 min at 25% B and 300 nl/min, 70 min at 50% B and 300 nl/min, 75 min at 96% B and 300 nl/min, 78–80 min at 96% B and 750 nl/min, 80.1-90 min at 4% B and 750 nl/min. Positively charged ions were generated at spray voltage of 2.2 kV using a stainless steel emitter attached to the Nanospray Flex Ion Source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The quadrupole/orbitrap instrument was operated in Full MS/ data-dependent MS2 mode. Precursor ions were monitored at m/z 300–1100 at a resolution of 120,000 FWHM (full width at half maximum) using a maximum injection time (ITmax) of 50 ms and 300% normalized AGC (automatic gain control) target. Precursor ions with a charge state of z = 2–5 were filtered at an isolation width of m/z 4.0 amu for further fragmentation at 28% HCD collision energy. MS2 ions were scanned at 15,000 FWHM (ITmax = 40 ms, AGC = 200%). Each sample was measured in triplicate with a different compensation voltage (-42 V, -57 V, -72 V).

Protein database search.

Tandem mass spectra were searched against the UniProt database of Candida albicans SC5314 (https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/UP000000559; 2025/10/20) using FragPipe 23.1 and the database search algorithm MS Fragger 4.3. Two missed cleavages were allowed for the tryptic digestion. The precursor mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm and the fragment mass tolerance was set to 20 ppm. Modifications were defined as dynamic Met oxidation, protein N-terminal acetylation, and Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphorylation (Sequest HT only). DDA + was used for data-dependent acquisition with wide window isolation and chimeric spectra detection of the top 5 precursor ions. MS Booster with the deep learning model of DIA-NN for retention time and mass spectra prediction was applied together with Percolator and a reverse decoy database for q-value validation of spectral matches using a strict false discovery rate (FDR) <1% on both peptide and protein level. Label-free protein quantification was based on the IonQuant 1.11.11 algorithm. Normalization was performed by using the total protein amount method per sample group. Imputation of missing quan values was applied by using deterministic random abundance values of 50–100% of the lowest abundance identified per sample. Enriched proteins were defined as a fold change of >2, pvalue <0.05 and at least identified in 2 of 3 biological replicates of the HA-tagged sample group. Statistics and data visualization was performed with R 4.5.1 and RStudio 2025.09.0.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Growth of the conditional mutants and control strains.

The conditional mutants (M6), which contain only the ectopically integrated gene copy, and control strains (M7), which additionally retain one of the endogenous alleles (M3 in the case of KSP1) were streaked on YPD plates and incubated for 2 days at 30°C. Both independently generated strain series are shown in each case. WT, parental wild-type strain SC5314.

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s001.pdf (158.8KB, pdf)
S2 Fig. Growth of viable pekΔ null mutants.

The M8 null mutants (M5 in the case of KSP1) and M9 control strains (M6 in the case of KSP1) were streaked on YPD plates and incubated at 30°C and at 37°C. Photographs were taken after 2, 4, and 6 days. Both independently generated strain series are shown in each case.

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s002.pdf (395.7KB, pdf)
S3 Fig. Analysis of ptk2Δ suppressor mutants.

(A) Four viable clones obtained after the induced gene deletion in the conditional M6 mutants (two each from strains A and B) were streaked on YPD plates and incubated for two days at 30°C. The wild-type strain SC5314 (WT) is shown for comparison. (B) Southern hybridization analysis of ClaI-digested genomic DNA of the wild-type strain SC5314, the conditional M6 mutants, and the four ptk2Δ suppressor mutants with probes from the PTK2 downstream and coding regions confirms the absence of PTK2 in the suppressor mutants. (C) Southern hybridization analysis of XhoI/SpeI-digested genomic DNA of the same strains with an ADH1 upstream probe demonstrates correct FLP-mediated excision of the ectopically integrated PTK2 copy in the suppressor mutants. A labeled size marker (M, in kb) was included in the probes. The identities of the hybridizing fragments are indicated.

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s003.pdf (212.9KB, pdf)
S4 Fig. Growth of orf19.3456Δ and orf19.5376Δ control strains.

The M7 mutants were passaged overnight in YCB-BSA-YE medium to induce FLP-mediated excison of the ectopically integrated gene copy. The cultures were diluted in water, transferred to a 35 mm culture dish, covered with YPD agar, and incubated at 30°C. Images were taken every 5 min with a DMI6000 Leica inverted microscope (S4-S5 Videos). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points.

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s004.pdf (338.8KB, pdf)
S5 Fig. Chitin and nuclei staining of serum-induced wild-type hyphae.

A YPD overnight culture of the wild-type strain SC5314 was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 10% FCS and incubated for 6 h at 37°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 hours and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS and stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B). Cells were imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy.

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s005.pdf (283.8KB, pdf)
S6 Fig. Chitin and nuclei staining of orf19.3456Δ and orf19.5376Δ control strains.

YCB-BSA-YE overnight cultures of the M7 mutants were diluted 1:100 in YPD medium and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the cultures were taken after 4 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS and stained with calcofluor white (A and C) or DAPI (B and D). Cells were imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy.

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s006.pdf (290.5KB, pdf)
S7 Fig. Analysis of orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 kinase-dead mutants.

(A) Viability of strains that retain a kinase-dead allele at the endogenous locus after FLP-mediated excision of the ectopically integrated wild-type copy. YCB-BSA-YE overnight cultures of the conditional M10 mutants were appropriately diluted and the total number of cells and CFUs was determined as described in materials and methods. (B) Microscopic appearance of the kinase-dead mutants. Cells from the YCB-BSA-YE cultures were diluted, transferred to a culture dish, covered with YPD agar, and observed by video microscopy at 30°C (S6-S7 Videos). Pictures were taken at the indicated time points. (C) Kinase-dead proteins are produced at wild-type levels. Strains expressing an HA-tagged wild-type or kinase-dead allele from the endogenous genomic locus in addition to an ectopically integrated wild-type copy were grown to log-phase in YPD medium and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HA and anti-tubulin antibodies. (D) HA-tagged kinases are functional. Strains containing a single wild-type (M2) or HA-tagged (H2) allele at the endogenous locus were grown for 2 days at 30°C on YPD plates. The wild-type strain SC5314 is shown for comparison. Results for two independently generated series of strains are shown in (A), (C), and (D).

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s007.pdf (448.5KB, pdf)
S8 Fig. Auxin-induced degradation of the orf19.5376-encoded kinase causes defects in septum formation and nuclear localization.

A YPD overnight culture of the auxin-inducible orf19.5376 mutants was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points. Identically treated control cells (the heterozygous M2 mutants containing a single untagged orf19.5376 allele) are shown in (C) and (D).

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s008.pdf (373.5KB, pdf)
S9 Fig. Septin localization in wild-type cells.

A YPD overnight culture of the wild-type strain SC5314 containing a GFP-tagged CDC3 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with paraformaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with DAPI, and imaged by DIC (left panels) and fluorescence microscopy (middle panels). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points, including overlays of the DIC and fluorescence micrographs (right panels).

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s009.pdf (218.4KB, pdf)
S10 Fig. Septin localization in serum-induced wild-type hyphae.

A YPD overnight culture of the wild-type strain SC5314 containing a GFP-tagged CDC3 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD with 10% serum and grown at 37°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with paraformaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with DAPI (A) or calcofluor white (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points, including overlays of the DIC and fluorescence micrographs.

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s010.pdf (373.5KB, pdf)
S11 Fig. Auxin-induced degradation of the orf19.3456-encoded kinase causes formation of aseptate, multinucleate hyphae.

A YPD overnight culture of the auxin-inducible orf19.3456 mutants was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points. Identically treated control cells (the heterozygous M2 mutants containing a single untagged orf19.3456 allele) are shown in (C) and (D).

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s011.pdf (365.5KB, pdf)
S12 Fig. Chitin and nuclei staining of auxin-treated DBF2 control strains.

A YPD overnight culture of the heterozygous M2 mutants containing a single untagged DBF2 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points.

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s012.pdf (301.2KB, pdf)
S13 Fig. Chitin and nuclei staining of auxin-treated orf19.193 control strains.

A YPD overnight culture of the heterozygous M2 mutants containing a single untagged orf19.193 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points.

(PDF)

pgen.1012118.s013.pdf (297.6KB, pdf)
S1 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of the wild-type strain SC5314.

(AVI)

Download video file (4.9MB, avi)
S2 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.3456Δ mutants.

(AVI)

Download video file (7MB, avi)
S3 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.5376Δ mutants.

(AVI)

Download video file (12.9MB, avi)
S4 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.3456Δ control cells.

(AVI)

Download video file (3.9MB, avi)
S5 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.5376Δ control cells.

(AVI)

Download video file (4.3MB, avi)
S6 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.3456K41R mutants.

(AVI)

Download video file (10.7MB, avi)
S7 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.5376K65R mutants.

(AVI)

Download video file (8.1MB, avi)
S8 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-inducible orf19.5376 mutants.

(AVI)

Download video file (10MB, avi)
S9 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-treated orf19.5376 control cells.

(AVI)

Download video file (3.3MB, avi)
S10 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-inducible orf19.3456 mutants.

(AVI)

Download video file (8.5MB, avi)
S11 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-treated orf19.3456 control cells.

(AVI)

Download video file (3.4MB, avi)
S12 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-inducible dbf2 mutants.

(AVI)

Download video file (8MB, avi)
S13 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-treated dbf2 control cells.

(AVI)

Download video file (3MB, avi)
S14 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-inducible orf19.193 mutants.

(AVI)

Download video file (7.9MB, avi)
S15 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-treated orf19.193 control cells.

(AVI)

Download video file (3.5MB, avi)
S1 Table. C. albicans strains used in this study.

(XLSX)

pgen.1012118.s029.xlsx (25.6KB, xlsx)
S2 Table. Significantly enriched proteins identified after Co-IP with the orf19.3456-encoded kinase.

(XLSX)

pgen.1012118.s030.xlsx (24KB, xlsx)
S3 Table. Proteomics results.

(XLSX)

pgen.1012118.s031.xlsx (2.4MB, xlsx)
S4 Table. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

(XLSX)

pgen.1012118.s032.xlsx (19.6KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We thank Mark Hall for the generous gift of plasmid pHLP728 containing the AID* cassette before publication.

Data Availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [53] partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD070087.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the TRR 124 FungiNet, “Pathogenic fungi and their human host: Networks of Interaction,” DFG project number 210879364, projects C2 to JM and Z2 to OK. Publication of the work was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Würzburg. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Lew-Smith J, Binkley J, Sherlock G. The Candida Genome Database: annotation and visualization updates. Genetics. 2025;229(3):iyaf001. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyaf001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ramírez-Zavala B, Krüger I, Dunker C, Jacobsen ID, Morschhäuser J. The protein kinase Ire1 has a Hac1-independent essential role in iron uptake and virulence of Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18(2):e1010283. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ramírez-Zavala B, Mottola A, Haubenreißer J, Schneider S, Allert S, Brunke S et al. The Snf1-activating kinase Sak1 is a key regulator of metabolic adaptation and in vivo fitness of Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol. 2017;104(6):989–1007. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reuss O, Vik A, Kolter R, Morschhäuser J. The SAT1 flipper, an optimized tool for gene disruption in Candida albicans. Gene. 2004;341:119–27. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sasse C, Schillig R, Dierolf F, Weyler M, Schneider S, Mogavero S. The transcription factor Ndt80 does not contribute to Mrr1-, Tac1-, and Upc2-mediated fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blankenship JR, Fanning S, Hamaker JJ, Mitchell AP. An extensive circuitry for cell wall regulation in Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(2):e1000752. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Enloe B, Diamond A, Mitchell AP. A single-transformation gene function test in diploid Candida albicans. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(20):5730–6. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.20.5730-5736.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Petter R, Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ. A gene homologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF1 appears to be essential for the viability of Candida albicans. Infect Immun. 1997;65(12):4909–17. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.12.4909-4917.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Segal ES, Gritsenko V, Levitan A, Yadav B, Dror N, Steenwyk JL et al. Gene essentiality analyzed by in vivo transposon mutagenesis and machine learning in a stable haploid isolate of Candida albicans. mBio. 2018;9(5):e02048-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02048-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vyas VK, Barrasa MI, Fink GR. A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Sci Adv. 2015;1(3):e1500248. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mottola A, Schwanfelder S, Morschhäuser J. Generation of viable Candida albicans mutants lacking the “essential” protein kinase Snf1 by inducible gene deletion. mSphere. 2020;5(4):e00805-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00805-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ramírez-Zavala B, Krüger I, Wollner A, Schwanfelder S, Morschhäuser J. The Ypk1 protein kinase signaling pathway is rewired and not essential for viability in Candida albicans. PLoS Genet. 2023;19(8):e1010890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Michel S, Ushinsky S, Klebl B, Leberer E, Thomas D, Whiteway M.et al. Generation of conditional lethal Candida albicans mutants by inducible deletion of essential genes. Mol Microbiol. 2002;46(1):269–80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03167.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kramara J, Kim M-J, Ollinger TL, Ristow LC, Wakade RS, Zarnowski R et al. Systematic analysis of the Candida albicans kinome reveals environmentally contingent protein kinase-mediated regulation of filamentation and biofilm formation in vitro and in vivo. mBio. 2024;15(8):e0124924. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01249-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fu C, Zhang X, Veri AO, Iyer KR, Lash E, Xue A, et al. Leveraging machine learning essentiality predictions and chemogenomic interactions to identify antifungal targets. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6497. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26850-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guarini N, Saliba E, Andre B. Phosphoregulation of the yeast Pma1 H -ATPase autoinhibitory domain involves the Ptk1/2 kinases and the Glc7 PP1 phosphatase and is under TORC1 control. PLoS Genet. 2024;20(1):e1011121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ramírez-Zavala B, Betsova D, Schwanfelder S, Krüger I, Mottola A, Krüger T.et al. Multiple phosphorylation sites regulate the activity of the repressor Mig1 in Candida albicans. mSphere. 2023;8(6):e0054623. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00546-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Willger SD, Liu Z, Olarte RA, Adamo ME, Stajich JE, Myers LC.et al. Analysis of the Candida albicans phosphoproteome. Eukaryot Cell. 2015;14(5):474–85. doi: 10.1128/EC.00011-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hong S-P, Leiper FC, Woods A, Carling D, Carlson M. Activation of yeast Snf1 and mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase by upstream kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(15):8839–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1533136100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nath N, McCartney RR, Schmidt MC. Yeast Pak1 kinase associates with and activates Snf1. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(11):3909–17. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.11.3909-3917.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sutherland CM, Hawley SA, McCartney RR, Leech A, Stark MJR, Schmidt MC.et al. Elm1p is one of three upstream kinases for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF1 complex. Curr Biol. 2003;13(15):1299–305. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00459-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bouquin N, Barral Y, Courbeyrette R, Blondel M, Snyder M, Mann C. Regulation of cytokinesis by the Elm1 protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 2000;113 (Pt 8):1435–45. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.8.1435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marquardt J, Chen X, Bi E. Reciprocal regulation by Elm1 and Gin4 controls septin hourglass assembly and remodeling. J Cell Biol. 2024;223(5):e202308143. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202308143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marquardt J, Yao L-L, Okada H, Svitkina T, Bi E. The LKB1-like kinase Elm1 controls septin hourglass assembly and stability by regulating filament pairing. Curr Biol. 2020;30(12):2386-2394.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moriya H, Isono K. Analysis of genetic interactions between DHH1, SSD1 and ELM1 indicates their involvement in cellular morphology determination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1999;15(6):481–96. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199904)15:6<481::AID-YEA391>3.0.CO;2-M [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sreenivasan A, Kellogg D. The Elm1 kinase functions in a mitotic signaling network in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(12):7983–94. doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.12.7983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Blacketer MJ, Koehler CM, Coats SG, Myers AM, Madaule P. Regulation of dimorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: involvement of the novel protein kinase homolog Elm1p and protein phosphatase 2A. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13(9):5567–81. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5567-5581.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Milholland KL, Gregor JB, Hoda S, Píriz-Antúnez S, Dueñas-Santero E, Vu BG.et al. Rapid, efficient auxin-inducible protein degradation in Candida pathogens. mSphere. 2023;8(5):e0028323. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00283-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gladfelter AS, Zyla TR, Lew DJ. Genetic interactions among regulators of septin organization. Eukaryot Cell. 2004;3(4):847–54. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.4.847-854.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thomas CL, Blacketer MJ, Edgington NP, Myers AM. Assembly interdependence among the S. cerevisiae bud neck ring proteins Elm1p, Hsl1p and Cdc12p. Yeast. 2003;20(9):813–26. doi: 10.1002/yea.1003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Guertin DA, Chang L, Irshad F, Gould KL, McCollum D. The role of the Sid1p kinase and Cdc14p in regulating the onset of cytokinesis in fission yeast. EMBO J. 2000;19(8):1803–15. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.8.1803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Simanis V. Pombe’s thirteen - control of fission yeast cell division by the septation initiation network. J Cell Sci. 2015;128(8):1465–74. doi: 10.1242/jcs.094821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bardin AJ, Amon A. MEN and SIN: what’s the difference?. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2(11):815–26. doi: 10.1038/35099020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McCollum D, Gould KL. Timing is everything: regulation of mitotic exit and cytokinesis by the MEN and SIN. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11(2):89–95. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01901-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mah AS, Jang J, Deshaies RJ. Protein kinase Cdc15 activates the Dbf2-Mob1 kinase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(13):7325–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.141098998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bates S. Candida albicans Cdc15 is essential for mitotic exit and cytokinesis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27157-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Clemente-Blanco A, González-Novo A, Machín F, Caballero-Lima D, Aragón L, Sánchez M.et al. The Cdc14p phosphatase affects late cell-cycle events and morphogenesis in Candida albicans. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 6):1130–43. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.González-Novo A, Labrador L, Pablo-Hernando ME, Correa-Bordes J, Sánchez M, Jiménez J.et al. Dbf2 is essential for cytokinesis and correct mitotic spindle formation in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol. 2009;72(6):1364–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06729.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Milne SW, Cheetham J, Lloyd D, Shaw S, Moore K, Paszkiewicz KH.et al. Role of Candida albicans Tem1 in mitotic exit and cytokinesis. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;69:84–95. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bryak G, Cox A, Lionakis MS, Thangamani S. Yeast and filamentous Candida auris stimulate distinct immune responses in the skin. mSphere. 2024;9(7):e0005524. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00055-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Santana DJ, O’Meara TR. Forward and reverse genetic dissection of morphogenesis identifies filament-competent Candida auris strains. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):7197. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27545-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kaneva IN, Sudbery IM, Dickman MJ, Sudbery PE. Proteins that physically interact with the phosphatase Cdc14 in Candida albicans have diverse roles in the cell cycle. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42530-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mohl DA, Huddleston MJ, Collingwood TS, Annan RS, Deshaies RJ. Dbf2-Mob1 drives relocalization of protein phosphatase Cdc14 to the cytoplasm during exit from mitosis. J Cell Biol. 2009;184(4):527–39. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200812022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bruno KS, Morrell JL, Hamer JE, Staiger CJ. SEPH, a Cdc7p orthologue from Aspergillus nidulans, functions upstream of actin ring formation during cytokinesis. Mol Microbiol. 2001;42(1):3–12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02605.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Heilig Y, Schmitt K, Seiler S. Phospho-regulation of the Neurospora crassa septation initiation network. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e79464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Souza ACO, Martin-Vicente A, Nywening AV, Ge W, Lowes DJ, Peters BM.et al. Loss of Septation Initiation Network (SIN) kinases blocks tissue invasion and unlocks echinocandin cidal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(8):e1009806. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Maekawa H, Jiangyan S, Takegawa K, Pereira G. SIN-like pathway kinases regulate the end of mitosis in the methylotrophic yeast Ogataea polymorpha. Cells. 2022;11(9):1519. doi: 10.3390/cells11091519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Köhler GA, White TC, Agabian N. Overexpression of a cloned IMP dehydrogenase gene of Candida albicans confers resistance to the specific inhibitor mycophenolic acid. J Bacteriol. 1997;179(7):2331–8. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.7.2331-2338.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ramírez-Zavala B, Hoffmann A, Krüger I, Schwanfelder S, Barker KS, Rogers PD.et al. Probing gene function in Candida albicans wild-type strains by Cas9-facilitated one-step integration of two dominant selection markers: a systematic analysis of recombination events at the target locus. mSphere. 2024;9(7):e0038824. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00388-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ramírez-Zavala B, Mottola A, Krüger I, Morschhäuser J. A suppressor mutation in the β-subunit Kis1 restores functionality of the SNF1 complex in Candida albicans snf4Δ mutants. mSphere. 2021;6(6):e0092921. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00929-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ramírez-Zavala B, Manz H, Englert F, Rogers PD, Morschhäuser J. A hyperactive form of the zinc cluster transcription factor Stb5 causes YOR1 overexpression and beauvericin resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(12):e01655-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01655-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Perez-Riverol Y, Bandla C, Kundu DJ, Kamatchinathan S, Bai J, Hewapathirana S. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Research. 2025;53(D1):D543–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Genet. 2026 Apr 21;22(4):e1012118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1012118.r001

Author response to Decision Letter 0


Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

11 Nov 2025

Decision Letter 0

Geraldine Butler, Jennifer Benanti

7 Dec 2025

PGENETICS-D-25-01229

Inducible gene deletion reveals essentiality of protein kinases and a septation initiation network in Candida albicans

PLOS Genetics

Dear Dr. Morschhäuser,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Genetics. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Genetics's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Most importantly, I agree with the concerns raised by Reviewer 2 that additional experimental evidence is needed to support the claims that orf19.3456 is a functional ortholog of S. pombe Sid1, that orf19.5376 is an ortholog of S. cerevisiae Elm1, and that orf19.193 is likely to be a regulatory subunit of orf19.193. In addition, as noted by Reviewers 2 and 3, several experiments lack the appropriate control strains for comparison, and these should be included.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 02 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosgenetics@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jennifer A Benanti

Academic Editor

PLOS Genetics

Geraldine Butler

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

Aimée Dudley

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Anne Goriely

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Journal Requirements:

1) Please ensure that the CRediT author contributions listed for every co-author are completed accurately and in full.

At this stage, the following Authors/Authors require contributions: Bernardo Ramírez-Zavala, Ines Krüger, Sonja Schwanfelder, Johannes Lackner, Thomas Krüger, Olaf Kniemeyer, and Joachim Morschhäuser. Please ensure that the full contributions of each author are acknowledged in the "Add/Edit/Remove Authors" section of our submission form.

The list of CRediT author contributions may be found here: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/s/authorship#loc-author-contributions

2) We ask that a manuscript source file is provided at Revision. Please upload your manuscript file as a .doc, .docx, .rtf or .tex. If you are providing a .tex file, please upload it under the item type u2018LaTeX Source Fileu2019 and leave your .pdf version as the item type u2018Manuscriptu2019.

3) Please upload all main figures as separate Figure files in .tif or .eps format. For more information about how to convert and format your figure files please see our guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/s/figures

4) We notice that your supplementary Figures are included in the manuscript file. Please remove them and upload them with the file type 'Supporting Information'. Please ensure that each Supporting Information file has a legend listed in the manuscript after the references list.

Note: If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Reviewer #1: In this study, the authors apply their inducible gene deletion strategy to definitively assign function to C. albicans protein kinase genes. They extend their analysis through time course analysis, auxin-directed protein depletion, and mass spectrometry to assign pathway relationships to several essential protein kinase genes and functionally related genes. Each new essential protein kinase gene is followed up to reach clear conclusions about signaling pathways.

This study presents a truly monumental amount of work. It is of central importance to the C. albicans community because of its implications for cell biology, virulence, regulatory networks, and drug development. It will be of interest to geneticists beyond the C. albicans community because of the clarity of thought and logic, and the elegance of the approaches.

There is an additional reason that I am especially enthusiastic about the manuscript: it presents a very high level of scholarly analysis of the literature. Essentiality and protein kinase functions have been assessed in this organism for about 25 years, so most authors seem to rely simply on the accurate but more minimal gene summaries at the CGD and other databases. I appreciated especially that the authors here really dug into the original literature to explain why results have differed over the decades.

Finally, there is a quote from the authors that I have already etched into my memory and embraced in my heart. Yeah, I may even put it on a T-shirt for all to see! It is, "The occurrence of suppressor mutations that enable (normal) growth of otherwise nonviable or poorly growing mutants is indeed an issue that must be kept in mind, especially when rare homozygous mutants are obtained using traditional gene deletion methods." In one sense it is obvious, but I cannot tell you how many times authors and experimentalists forget all about this issue as soon as they get their long sought-after mutant. I really appreciate the examples that the authors drilled down into in this study.

I have a few minor criticisms for the authors' consideration.

Line 223 "because of the immediate effect of protein depletion" I thought you might say "more immediate effect."

Lines 352-354 "...we suggest to rename these ORFs ELM1 and SID1 (and orf19.193 SRS1, for Sid1 regulatory subunit)." You might put these gene names in the abstract, because many readers may overlook them here toward the end of the paper.

Table 1. A very useful summary - thank you! (No criticism.)

Table 2. I really appreciate this summary of results, but it would be more intuitive if there were an additional column listing gene name or something like that.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript, Ramírez-Zavala et al. used an innovative inducible gene deletion strategy to assess the essentiality of eight putative essential protein kinases in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Of the eight kinases, PTK2, orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 were confirmed to be essential for growth under standard conditions. Under specific conditions, the authors were able to generate suppressor mutations in ptk2∆ mutants that enabled growth, namely in the Ptk2-dependent plasma membrane ATPase Pma1. Follow-up studies on the uncharacterized essential genes orf19.5376 and orf19.3456 showed the formation of filamentous cells with a defect in septum organization, which eventually lead to cell lysis. For orf19.3456, deletion mutants also exhibited multinucleated cells. To confirm the kinase activity of orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 is what was required for gene essentiality, the authors generated kinase-dead mutants, which confirmed the phenotypes of the inducible gene deletion mutants. In addition, the authors generated auxin-inducible protein depletion strains and confirmed the phenotypes of the deletion mutants. For orf19.3456, the authors performed co-IP followed by mass spectrometry to identify interacting partners, which led to the discovery of orf19.193 as a physical interactor. Depletion of degron-tagged orf19.193 resulted in the same terminal phenotype as orf19.3456 mutants, highlighting a role of this gene in C. albicans septin organization and cell cycle.

Overall, the paper presents an innovative approach to assess gene essentiality in C. albicans, emphasizing inducible gene deletion as a useful strategy to assess gene fitness in this fungal pathogen. Further, the authors establish the essentiality of several putative protein kinases that were previously uncharacterized. The authors examined the terminal phenotypes of several mutants, providing insights into the possible functions of two uncharacterized essential genes, orf19.3456 and orf19.5376. They employed complementary genetic strategies that confirmed phenotypes observed using the inducible gene deletion strategy. Nonetheless, the work could benefit from additional mechanistic insights into how orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 regulate septin organization and cytokinesis in C. albicans. To increase the impact of the manuscript, I have listed some suggestions in the point-by-point comments below:

Major comments:

1) The authors claim that orf19.3456 is the functional ortholog of S. pombe Sid1 based on cellular morphology and lack of septum formation. However, the disruption of unrelated proteins can also produce multinucleate cells and septation defects (e.g., mutants of the C. albicans RAM network). The authors should provide additional experimentation including cellular localization studies and/or functional complementation. For instance, the authors could confirm whether orf19.3456 localizes to spindle pole body in anaphase as seen with S. pombe Sid1 (Guertin et al., 2000).

2) The authors performed co-IP followed by mass spectrometry to identify orf19.193 as a physical interactor of orf9.3456. While they confirmed a orf19.193 mutant showed the same phenotypes as a orf19.3456 mutant, they were unable to validate the physical interaction co-IP coupled to western blotting. To further investigate whether orf19.193 may be a regulatory subunit of orf19.3456, the authors should perform additional experimentation; for example, cellular co-localization studies to support the mass spectrometry results.

3) The authors showed that orf19.5376 is important for septin localization and cytokinesis, which is similar to S. cerevisiae Elm1. As discussed in Comment 1, disruption of many unrelated proteins can produce these phenotypes. Thus, additional experimental evidence to support functional orthology between orf19.5376 and S. cerevisiae Elm1 is required. For example, examining the localization of orf19.5376 to confirm it is localized to the budneck. Alternatively, the authors could attempt functional complementation studies to assess whether C. albicans orf19.5376 can complement S. cerevisiae elm1 mutants and vice versa.

4) The authors employ auxin-inducible degron-tagged kinase strains in Fig 6-Fig 9, S5 Fig, and S7 Fig. For comparison, it would be helpful to include parental controls (e.g., a strain containing single wild type allele treated with 5-Ad-IAA). For comparison of filamentous cells, it is important to include controls (e.g., serum-induced filaments), which possesses normal constrictions, septin and/or nuclei as opposed to filaments induced upon cell cycle inhibition.

5) The authors employ kinase-dead orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 strains in S4 Fig. It would be helpful for comparison to include wild type controls in both viability and microscopy assays (S4 Fig A-B).

Minor comments:

1) The authors claim C. albicans orf19.3456 has no orthologue in S. cerevisiae (line 239-242). However, orf19.3456 appears to have 42.56% sequence identity to S. cerevisiae KIC1 (for reference orf19.3456 shows 40.23% identity to S. pombe SID1). Kic1 is a component of the well-established RAM network, which regulates polarized growth and cell separation. C. albicans RAM mutants exhibit cell separation defects and a multinucleate phenotype (Song et al. 2008), consistent with orf19.3456 mutant phenotypes. Thus, it should be addressed in the manuscript whether orf19.3456 may function as part of RAM network in C. albicans.

2) The authors claim that orf19.193 belongs to the same family as S. pombe Cdc14 and thus is a putative regulatory subunit of orf19.3456 (line 301-303). However, BLASTp analysis of C. albicans orf19.193 against S. pombe Cdc14 indicates poor sequence similarity (21.71%). The authors should include supporting evidence (e.g., structural similarity analysis or conserved domains search) of why they believe orf19.193 belongs to the same family as S. pombe Cdc14.

3) For ease of comparison, it would be helpful to combine Fig 6C (degron-tagged kinase strain) with S6 Fig (the auxin-treated wild type control) in the same figure.

4) Remove the delta symbol from line 197. The header should read: “orf19.5376 encodes…”

Reviewer #3: In this paper, the investigators have used a clever inducible gene deletion strategy to study a handful of kinases thought to be essential based on past inability to generate mutants in one or more reports in the human opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans. Using this strategy they found that several are actually not truly essential for growth under lab conditions, where others are. By characterizing the terminal phenotypes after gene deletion they have been able to assign a previously uncharacterized essential kinase ORF as the homolog of the S. cerevisiae ELM1 kinase involved in septin organization, bud growth and cytokinesis. For another essential uncharacterized kinase ORF, they demonstrate that it is a previously unrecognized component of the SIN pathway found in S. pombe and filamentous fungi but absent in S. cerevisiae (and thought to be generally absent in budding yeasts) and identify its putative activating subunit (also a previously uncharacterized ORF). The investigators then used a completely orthologous method, auxin-inducible protein degradation, to confirm the phenotypes and functional assignments of these two essential kinases. The application of two different methods, each producing the same phenotype, makes the study very robust and the conclusions rock solid. I find this study quite impactful as it highlights some of the problems with using permanent gene disruptions to characterize gene function and assess essentiality. In addition, the authors have provided useful new insight into the kinome of this important fungal pathogen and revealed something unexpected about a key fungal signaling pathway.

I have only a few minor comments for consideration. Otherwise, the study is well-designed and the manuscript well-written.

1. In the abstract the authors state that the product of orf19.5376 “is functionally similar” to Elm1 of S. cerevisiae. However, I think it also is the closest ortholog of Elm1 in C. albicans, correct? At least, in the Candida Genome Database Elm1 is listed as the S. cerevisiae ortholog of this kinase. I would adjust the wording to indicate this.

2. Also in the abstract I would go ahead and state the name of the S. pombe ortholog in the SIN pathway at the end (rather than just calling it the orf19.3456-encoded kinase).

3. One concern with the conclusion about the hyperpolarized “hyphal”-like structures being aseptate is that there is no control showing septa in wild-type hyphae. I understand the structures that form in these induced mutants are probably not true hyphae or pseudohyphae and that septa can be seen between some of the yeast-form cells, but it would be nice to know that the imaging method could reveal septa in the hyphal-like structures if they were present. This could be accomplished simply by inducing hyphae in the wild-type parent strain and showing the septa for comparison under identical imaging and processing conditions.

4. The authors conclude that the mutants exhibit cytokinesis defects (e.g. lines 179-180). While this may be true, cytokinesis has not been explicitly monitored. I feel this conclusion would require assessing formation and contraction of the actomyosin ring because there are many mutants in other pathways that give rise to a similar hyperpolarized cell phenotype in this organism. The results are consistent with this possibility but maybe the conclusion is worded too strong. Or the authors can provide more explanation for why they conclude cytokinesis is defective – its possible I am missing something.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information., and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information., and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information., and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy....

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors of applicable studies deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Geraldine Butler, Jennifer Benanti

26 Mar 2026

PGENETICS-D-25-01229R1

Inducible gene deletion reveals essentiality of protein kinases and a septation initiation network in Candida albicans

PLOS Genetics

Dear Dr. Morschhäuser,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Genetics. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Genetics's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

As you will see, the revised manuscript has been reviewed by two of the original reviewers, both of whom are supportive of publication. Reviewer 3 has identified one minor point concerning a newly added experiment that would benefit from additional clarification prior to publication. This appears to be a simple and straightforward control that should be able to addressed easily.

Please submit your revised manuscript within by Apr 25 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosgenetics@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jennifer A Benanti

Academic Editor

PLOS Genetics

Geraldine Butler

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

Aimée Dudley

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Anne Goriely

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

1) Please ensure that the CRediT author contributions listed for every co-author are completed accurately and in full.

At this stage, the following Authors/Authors require contributions: Bernardo Ramírez-Zavala, Ines Krüger, Sonja Schwanfelder, Johannes Lackner, Thomas Krüger, Olaf Kniemeyer, and Joachim Morschhäuser. Please ensure that the full contributions of each author are acknowledged in the "Add/Edit/Remove Authors" section of our submission form.

The list of CRediT author contributions may be found here: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/s/authorship#loc-author-contributions

2) We ask that a manuscript source file is provided at Revision. Please upload your manuscript file as a .doc, .docx, .rtf or .tex. If you are providing a .tex file, please upload it under the item type u2018LaTeX Source Fileu2019 and leave your .pdf version as the item type u2018Manuscriptu2019.

3)  Please ensure that the funders and grant numbers match between the Financial Disclosure field and the Funding Information tab in your submission form. Note that the funders must be provided in the same order in both places as well.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: This study presents a monumental amount of rigorous, highly significant work. My comments have all been addressed. I hope to see it in press soon, so that it can benefit our community.

Reviewer #3: I still think this is a great study and the overall rigor is high and suitable for publishing in PLoS Genetics. I only had a few comments on the initial submission and most were addressed adequately. Unfortunately, one of my concerns was not addressed as I had intended, possibly due to a lack of detail on my part. I had suggested that wild-type hyphae be shown with calcofluor white staining side-by-side with the two kinase mutants to show what normal septa would look like and validate the conclusion that the mutants lack septa in their hyperpolarized structures. The authors added new Figure S9 to address this, but unfortunately it includes Cdc3-GFP signal demarking the septin rings, which overlaps with and occludes the calcofluor white signal at the septa. This figure also does not use the same imaging and image processing method as the figures I was referring to - Figure 5A and Figure 8C. I still think it is important that wild-type hyphal controls (just SC5314) be included specifically for these figures, highlighting normal septum signal with this imaging procedure.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics    data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information., and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information., and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information., and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy....

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure resubmission:

While revising your submission, we strongly recommend that you use PLOS’s NAAS tool (https://ngplosjournals.pagemajik.ai/artanalysis) to test your figure files. NAAS can convert your figure files to the TIFF file type and meet basic requirements (such as print size, resolution), or provide you with a report on issues that do not meet our requirements and that NAAS cannot fix.

After uploading your figures to PLOS’s NAAS tool - https://ngplosjournals.pagemajik.ai/artanalysis, NAAS will process the files provided and display the results in the "Uploaded Files" section of the page as the processing is complete. If the uploaded figures meet our requirements (or NAAS is able to fix the files to meet our requirements), the figure will be marked as "fixed" above. If NAAS is unable to fix the files, a red "failed" label will appear above. When NAAS has confirmed that the figure files meet our requirements, please download the file via the download option, and include these NAAS processed figure files when submitting your revised manuscript.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 2

Geraldine Butler, Jennifer Benanti

2 Apr 2026

Dear Dr Morschhäuser,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Inducible gene deletion reveals essentiality of protein kinases and a septation initiation network in Candida albicans" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional acceptance, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about making your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Jennifer A Benanti

Academic Editor

PLOS Genetics

Geraldine Butler

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

Aimée Dudley

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Anne Goriely

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

BlueSky: @plos.bsky.social

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our . As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our . As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our . As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website....

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly:

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-25-01229R2

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present. requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present. requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present. requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org....

Acceptance letter

Geraldine Butler, Jennifer Benanti

PGENETICS-D-25-01229R2

Inducible gene deletion reveals essentiality of protein kinases and a septation initiation network in Candida albicans

Dear Dr Morschhäuser,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Inducible gene deletion reveals essentiality of protein kinases and a septation initiation network in Candida albicans" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

For Research Articles, you will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Anita Estes

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Growth of the conditional mutants and control strains.

    The conditional mutants (M6), which contain only the ectopically integrated gene copy, and control strains (M7), which additionally retain one of the endogenous alleles (M3 in the case of KSP1) were streaked on YPD plates and incubated for 2 days at 30°C. Both independently generated strain series are shown in each case. WT, parental wild-type strain SC5314.

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s001.pdf (158.8KB, pdf)
    S2 Fig. Growth of viable pekΔ null mutants.

    The M8 null mutants (M5 in the case of KSP1) and M9 control strains (M6 in the case of KSP1) were streaked on YPD plates and incubated at 30°C and at 37°C. Photographs were taken after 2, 4, and 6 days. Both independently generated strain series are shown in each case.

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s002.pdf (395.7KB, pdf)
    S3 Fig. Analysis of ptk2Δ suppressor mutants.

    (A) Four viable clones obtained after the induced gene deletion in the conditional M6 mutants (two each from strains A and B) were streaked on YPD plates and incubated for two days at 30°C. The wild-type strain SC5314 (WT) is shown for comparison. (B) Southern hybridization analysis of ClaI-digested genomic DNA of the wild-type strain SC5314, the conditional M6 mutants, and the four ptk2Δ suppressor mutants with probes from the PTK2 downstream and coding regions confirms the absence of PTK2 in the suppressor mutants. (C) Southern hybridization analysis of XhoI/SpeI-digested genomic DNA of the same strains with an ADH1 upstream probe demonstrates correct FLP-mediated excision of the ectopically integrated PTK2 copy in the suppressor mutants. A labeled size marker (M, in kb) was included in the probes. The identities of the hybridizing fragments are indicated.

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s003.pdf (212.9KB, pdf)
    S4 Fig. Growth of orf19.3456Δ and orf19.5376Δ control strains.

    The M7 mutants were passaged overnight in YCB-BSA-YE medium to induce FLP-mediated excison of the ectopically integrated gene copy. The cultures were diluted in water, transferred to a 35 mm culture dish, covered with YPD agar, and incubated at 30°C. Images were taken every 5 min with a DMI6000 Leica inverted microscope (S4-S5 Videos). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points.

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s004.pdf (338.8KB, pdf)
    S5 Fig. Chitin and nuclei staining of serum-induced wild-type hyphae.

    A YPD overnight culture of the wild-type strain SC5314 was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 10% FCS and incubated for 6 h at 37°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 hours and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS and stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B). Cells were imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy.

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s005.pdf (283.8KB, pdf)
    S6 Fig. Chitin and nuclei staining of orf19.3456Δ and orf19.5376Δ control strains.

    YCB-BSA-YE overnight cultures of the M7 mutants were diluted 1:100 in YPD medium and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the cultures were taken after 4 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS and stained with calcofluor white (A and C) or DAPI (B and D). Cells were imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy.

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s006.pdf (290.5KB, pdf)
    S7 Fig. Analysis of orf19.3456 and orf19.5376 kinase-dead mutants.

    (A) Viability of strains that retain a kinase-dead allele at the endogenous locus after FLP-mediated excision of the ectopically integrated wild-type copy. YCB-BSA-YE overnight cultures of the conditional M10 mutants were appropriately diluted and the total number of cells and CFUs was determined as described in materials and methods. (B) Microscopic appearance of the kinase-dead mutants. Cells from the YCB-BSA-YE cultures were diluted, transferred to a culture dish, covered with YPD agar, and observed by video microscopy at 30°C (S6-S7 Videos). Pictures were taken at the indicated time points. (C) Kinase-dead proteins are produced at wild-type levels. Strains expressing an HA-tagged wild-type or kinase-dead allele from the endogenous genomic locus in addition to an ectopically integrated wild-type copy were grown to log-phase in YPD medium and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HA and anti-tubulin antibodies. (D) HA-tagged kinases are functional. Strains containing a single wild-type (M2) or HA-tagged (H2) allele at the endogenous locus were grown for 2 days at 30°C on YPD plates. The wild-type strain SC5314 is shown for comparison. Results for two independently generated series of strains are shown in (A), (C), and (D).

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s007.pdf (448.5KB, pdf)
    S8 Fig. Auxin-induced degradation of the orf19.5376-encoded kinase causes defects in septum formation and nuclear localization.

    A YPD overnight culture of the auxin-inducible orf19.5376 mutants was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points. Identically treated control cells (the heterozygous M2 mutants containing a single untagged orf19.5376 allele) are shown in (C) and (D).

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s008.pdf (373.5KB, pdf)
    S9 Fig. Septin localization in wild-type cells.

    A YPD overnight culture of the wild-type strain SC5314 containing a GFP-tagged CDC3 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with paraformaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with DAPI, and imaged by DIC (left panels) and fluorescence microscopy (middle panels). The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points, including overlays of the DIC and fluorescence micrographs (right panels).

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s009.pdf (218.4KB, pdf)
    S10 Fig. Septin localization in serum-induced wild-type hyphae.

    A YPD overnight culture of the wild-type strain SC5314 containing a GFP-tagged CDC3 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD with 10% serum and grown at 37°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with paraformaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with DAPI (A) or calcofluor white (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points, including overlays of the DIC and fluorescence micrographs.

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s010.pdf (373.5KB, pdf)
    S11 Fig. Auxin-induced degradation of the orf19.3456-encoded kinase causes formation of aseptate, multinucleate hyphae.

    A YPD overnight culture of the auxin-inducible orf19.3456 mutants was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points. Identically treated control cells (the heterozygous M2 mutants containing a single untagged orf19.3456 allele) are shown in (C) and (D).

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s011.pdf (365.5KB, pdf)
    S12 Fig. Chitin and nuclei staining of auxin-treated DBF2 control strains.

    A YPD overnight culture of the heterozygous M2 mutants containing a single untagged DBF2 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points.

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s012.pdf (301.2KB, pdf)
    S13 Fig. Chitin and nuclei staining of auxin-treated orf19.193 control strains.

    A YPD overnight culture of the heterozygous M2 mutants containing a single untagged orf19.193 allele was diluted 1:100 in YPD + 1 µM 5-Ad-IAA and grown at 30°C. Aliquots of the culture were taken every 2 h and fixed with formaldehyde. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with calcofluor white (A) or DAPI (B), and imaged by DIC and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows photographs of the cells at the indicated time points.

    (PDF)

    pgen.1012118.s013.pdf (297.6KB, pdf)
    S1 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of the wild-type strain SC5314.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (4.9MB, avi)
    S2 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.3456Δ mutants.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (7MB, avi)
    S3 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.5376Δ mutants.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (12.9MB, avi)
    S4 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.3456Δ control cells.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (3.9MB, avi)
    S5 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.5376Δ control cells.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (4.3MB, avi)
    S6 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.3456K41R mutants.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (10.7MB, avi)
    S7 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of orf19.5376K65R mutants.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (8.1MB, avi)
    S8 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-inducible orf19.5376 mutants.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (10MB, avi)
    S9 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-treated orf19.5376 control cells.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (3.3MB, avi)
    S10 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-inducible orf19.3456 mutants.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (8.5MB, avi)
    S11 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-treated orf19.3456 control cells.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (3.4MB, avi)
    S12 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-inducible dbf2 mutants.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (8MB, avi)
    S13 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-treated dbf2 control cells.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (3MB, avi)
    S14 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-inducible orf19.193 mutants.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (7.9MB, avi)
    S15 Video. Time-lapse microscopy of auxin-treated orf19.193 control cells.

    (AVI)

    Download video file (3.5MB, avi)
    S1 Table. C. albicans strains used in this study.

    (XLSX)

    pgen.1012118.s029.xlsx (25.6KB, xlsx)
    S2 Table. Significantly enriched proteins identified after Co-IP with the orf19.3456-encoded kinase.

    (XLSX)

    pgen.1012118.s030.xlsx (24KB, xlsx)
    S3 Table. Proteomics results.

    (XLSX)

    pgen.1012118.s031.xlsx (2.4MB, xlsx)
    S4 Table. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

    (XLSX)

    pgen.1012118.s032.xlsx (19.6KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pgen.1012118.s033.docx (28.7KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pgen.1012118.s034.docx (17.8KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [53] partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD070087.


    Articles from PLOS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES