Skip to main content
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology logoLink to Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
letter
. 2025 Jun 17;32(2):e246–e248. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2025.0594

Correspondence to letter to the editor on “Sex disparities in alcohol-associated liver disease and subtype differences in alcohol-attributable cancers in the United States”

Pojsakorn Danpanichkul 1,✉, Luis Antonio Diaz 2,3,4, Juan Pablo Arab 2,3,5, Amit G Singal 6, Ju Dong Yang 7,✉
PMCID: PMC13129795  PMID: 40524566

Dear Editor,

We are grateful to Liu [1] for thoughtful comments and critical appraisal of our manuscript [2], which aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of sex-specific trends in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) and alcohol-attributable cancers using the most recent Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 framework [3].

We appreciate the suggestion to deepen our policy analysis. While our primary aim was to identify epidemiological trends in ALD and alcohol-attributable cancers, we agree that incorporating policy context enhances translational relevance. As highlighted by Liu, interventions such as alcohol taxation and minimum unit pricing have proven effective. Indeed, recent evidence from Latin America demonstrated that a higher number of alcohol-related public health policies was associated with lower ALD mortality and alcohol use disorder (AUD) prevalence [4]. Likewise, Rehm et al. [5] showed that integrated alcohol policies led to significant reductions in per capita alcohol consumption. While our study did not directly assess the impact of specific policies, we used state-level variation as a proxy to reflect differenc-es in policy implementation and enforcement [6]. The results underscore the need for coordinated national strategies that incorporate evidence-based policy tools, including excise taxes, advertising restrictions, and limitations on alcohol availability, particularly in regions with the highest burden. However, policy-level efforts alone are insufficient. Reducing alcohol-related mortality requires a multi-level approach. At the individual level, patient education can promote awareness and encourage behavior change. Provider-level strategies, such as routine alcohol screening and brief interventions [7], should be more widely adopted. At the neighborhood level, interventions targeting the density of alcohol outlets through zoning regulations can influence consumption patterns [8]. These efforts should be combined with broader policy measures to form a comprehensive public health response.

We concur that ethnic disparities in ALD outcomes are of critical importance. As noted, the GBD framework does not currently disaggregate U.S. data by ethnicity, limiting our ability to examine intra-national disparities [3]. However, recent studies, utilizing the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dataset [9,10], fill this gap by demonstrating markedly different ALD trajectories across racial and ethnic groups. Notably, Hispanic individuals had disproportionately high ALD prevalence despite lower overall alcohol consumption, and Asian females had the lowest rates of liver transplantation once waitlisted [9]. These findings highlight the structural and biological contributors to ALD and AUD disparities and reinforce our call for more granular data in future GBD iterations. Policy interventions are also a key to addressing racial and ethnic disparities in alcohol mortality, often driven by unequal healthcare access, neighborhood factors, and exposure to alcohol-related harms [11,12].

We appreciate the attention drawn to the rise in ALD among women. Our study identified steeper increases in ALD-related mortality and cancer burden among women than men, which warrants targeted interventions. The sexbased biological mechanisms underlying greater susceptibility to alcohol-induced liver injury in women include differences in alcohol metabolism, hormonal modulation of inflammation, and altered gut permeability [13]. These mechanisms, combined with sociocultural barriers to AUD treatment and care engagement, contribute to the accelerated disease progression observed in women [14]. We support efforts to develop sex-specific clinical pathways and public health messaging to address these disparities.

We also acknowledge the limitations of CODEm and the potential for cause-of-death misclassification in alcohol-related conditions. The GBD 2021 capstone publication notes this challenge, especially in settings with underdeveloped health reporting systems [3]. However, in high-income countries like the U.S., death certificate coding is generally reliable, and K70 codes have demonstrated reasonable validity. Moreover, our findings align closely with those from national registries and independent analyses, including Zhang et al. [15], which used GBD methodology to describe similar upward trends in ALD incidence. While refinements in cause attribution will always be necessary, the consistency of our findings across multiple sources underscores the robustness of our conclusions.

We thank Liu for their constructive engagement with our work. We believe our study offers timely insight into evolving patterns of ALD and alcohol-attributable cancer burden in the U.S., with important implications for both research and policy. Future investigations should aim to integrate policy effectiveness, ethnicity-specific risk, and sex-based biological mechanisms into a unified framework for reducing the burden of alcohol-related diseases.

Abbreviations

ALD

alcohol-associated liver disease

AUD

alcohol use disorder

GBD

global burden of disease

SLD

steatotic liver disease

Footnotes

Authors’ contribution

Writing, original draft – Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Luis Antonio Diaz. Writing, review, and editing – Juan Pablo Arab, Ju Dong Yang, Amit G. Singal. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Conflicts of Interest

Amit G. Singal has served as a consultant or on advisory boards for Genentech, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Exelixis, Bayer, Elevar, Boston Scientific, Sirtex, FujiFilm Medical Sciences, Exact Sciences, Helio Genomics, Roche, Abbott, Glycotest, Curve Bio, IMCare, and GRAIL. Ju Dong Yang consults for AstraZeneca, Eisai, Exact Sciences, and FujiFilm Medical Sciences.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Liu D. Letter to the editor on “Sex disparities in alcoholassociated liver disease and subtype differences in alcoholattributable cancers in the United States”. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2026;32:e153–e154. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2025.0537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Danpanichkul P, Pang Y, Mahendru T, Tothanarungroj P, Díaz LA, Arab JP, et al. Sex disparities in alcohol-associated liver disease and subtype differences in alcohol-attributable cancers in the United States. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025;31:1058–1070. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2025.0169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.GBD 2021 Causes of Death Collaborators Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403:2100–2132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Díaz LA, Idalsoaga F, Fuentes-López E, Márquez-Lomas A, Ramírez CA, Roblero JP, et al. Impact of public health policies on alcohol-associated liver disease in Latin America: An ecological multinational study. Hepatology. 2021;74:2478–2490. doi: 10.1002/hep.32016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rehm J, Lange S, Miščikienė L, Jiang H. The impact of an integrated alcohol policy: The example of Lithuania. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2025;44:403–410. doi: 10.1111/dar.13980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Subbaraman MS, Sesline K, Kerr WC, Roberts SCM. Associations between state-level general population alcohol policies and drinking outcomes among women of reproductive age: Results from 1984 to 2020 National Alcohol Surveys. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken) 2023;47:1773–1782. doi: 10.1111/acer.15156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saitz R. Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: Absence of evidence for efficacy in people with dependence or very heavy drinking. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29:631–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00217.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hippensteel CL, Sadler RC, Milam AJ, Nelson V, Debra Furr-Holden C. Using zoning as a public health tool to reduce oversaturation of alcohol outlets: An examination of the effects of the new “300 Foot Rule” on packaged goods stores in a Mid-Atlantic City. Prev Sci. 2019;20:833–843. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0947-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ayares G, Díaz LA, Fuentes-López E, Idalsoaga F, Cotter TG, Dunn W, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the natural history of alcohol-associated liver disease in the United States. Liver Int. 2024;44:2822–2833. doi: 10.1111/liv.16023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim D, Danpanichkul P, Wijarnpreecha K, Cholankeril G, Loomba R, Ahmed A. Current burden of steatotic liver disease and fibrosis among adults in the United States, 2017-2023. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025;31:382–393. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Danpanichkul P, Pang Y, Kim D, Auttapracha T, Chan SY, Kim DH, et al. Disproportionately rising mortality rates of alcoholassociated acute Pancreatitis: Analysis from centers for Disease Control and prevention database (2011-2020) Pancreatology. 2025;25:508–515. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2025.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Slutske WS, Deutsch AR, Piasecki TM. Neighborhood contextual factors, alcohol use, and alcohol problems in the United States: Evidence from a nationally representative study of young adults. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40:1010–1019. doi: 10.1111/acer.13033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bizzaro D, Becchetti C, Trapani S, Lavezzo B, Zanetto A, D’Arcangelo F, et al. Influence of sex in alcohol-related liver disease: Pre-clinical and clinical settings. United European Gastroenterol J. 2023;11:218–227. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sedarous M, Flemming JA. Culture, stigma, and inequities creating barriers in alcohol use disorder management in alcohol-associated liver disease. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2023;21:130–133. doi: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang X, Zhang X, Liu M, Zhu L, He Z. Global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases due to alcohol use, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2019. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22:484. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02518-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Molecular Hepatology are provided here courtesy of Korean Association for the Study of the Liver

RESOURCES