Skip to main content
NCBI home page
EFSA Journal logoLink to EFSA Journal
. 2010 Nov 25;8(11):1886. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1886

Scientific Opinion on the practice of harvesting (collecting) feathers from live geese for down production

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
PMCID: PMC13129921  PMID: 42079536

Abstract

The Scientific Opinion on the practice of collecting feathers from live geese for down production concluded that removing feathers from live geese can be carried without causing pain, suffering or injury to the birds, if feathers are gathered. Gathering feathers from live geese is defined as removing feathers that are ripe due to the phenomenon of moulting and would never result in tissue damage. Plucking is the forcible removal of feathers that results in bleeding follicles and possibly other skin damage such as tears and bruising. The possibility that feathers are plucked cannot be excluded and it seems that at least minor suffering from pain and injuries is unavoidable under current commercial conditions. The process of catching, carrying and restraining the bird is the same whether feathers are gathered or plucked. Incorrect handling can include carrying the bird by the neck, legs or by one wing, restraining by sitting on the neck of the bird and throwing or dropping the bird. Bloody feathers, skin injuries, posture changes (e.g. hanging wings), dead birds and broken or dislocated bones are welfare‐outcome indicators which could be used to assess the welfare of geese submitted to feather collection. It is recommended that only ripe feathers should be removed from live geese. A control system should be in place to ensure this is carried out in practice. The presence of skin tears and blood or tissue and the presence of non‐ripe feathers in the collected feather material should be used to distinguish between plucking and gathering. Operators should be aware of good animal handling methods and the differentiation between ripe and unripe feathers. Further studies should be encouraged to improve the validity and reliability of welfare‐outcome indicators. The method to evaluate the maturity of the feathers should be validated and further developed.

Keywords: Animal welfare, feathers, down, geese, harvesting, gathering, collecting, plucking

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) : Scientific Opinion on the welfare aspects of the practice of harvesting feathers from live geese for down production. EFSA Journal 2010;8(11):1886. [57 pp.]. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1886

Panel members: Anette Bøtner, Donald Broom, Marcus Doherr, Mariano Domingo, Joerg Hartung, Linda Keeling, Frank Koenen, Simon More, David Morton, Pascal Oltenacu, Albert Osterhaus, Fulvio Salati, Mo Salman, Moez Sanaa, Michael Sharp, Jan Stegeman, Endre Szücs, Hans‐Hermann Thulke, Philippe Vannier, John Webster, Martin Wierup

Correspondence: AHAW@efsa.europa.eu

Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on the welfare aspects of the practice of harvesting feathers from live geese for down production: Linda Keeling (Panel Member, Chair), Donald Broom (Panel member, Rapporteur), Halina Bielińska, Janbaz Janan, Kurt Kotrschal, János Kozák, Dorothy McKeegan, Endre Szűcs, Hans‐Hermann Thulke, Grzegorz Tomczyk. The participants at the Member States and Stakeholder Technical Meeting held at EFSA premises in Parma on 28th May are gratefully acknowledged, for the useful discussions during the meeting and the provided information. H. Pingel, M. Muller and M. Lieber are gratefully acknowledge for the information provided to the experts WG during the WG Meeting on 2nd August as hearing experts. The Panel wishes to thank EFSA's staff members Oriol Ribó and Diana Quiliquini (trainee) for the support provided to this EFSA scientific output.

Adoption date: 27 October 2010

Published date: 25 November 2010

Question number: EFSA‐Q‐2009‐00966

On request from: European Commission

References

  1. AAdám, I. ; 2001. A toll. A baromfitoll és feldolgozása. [The feather. The poultry feather and its processing]. Budapest, Scriptor Kiadó. [Google Scholar]
  2. Apáczai Csere, J. , 1959. Magyar encyclopaedia. [Hungarian Encyclopedy]. s.l., Szépirodalmi Kiadó
  3. Ashton, Ch. , 1999. Domestic Geese. (Ramsbury, Marlborough, The Crowood Press; ). [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakos, A. , 2009. Libatépőket cincál a Négy Mancs. www.delmagyar.hu/_print.php?&block=_article&cid=2107054 [Accessed 22/07/2009]
  5. Báldy, B. , 1961. A baromfi tenyésztése. [The Breeding of Poultry]. Budapest, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó; [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartlett, T. , 1986. Ducks and Geese. A Guide to Management. (Ramsbury, Marlborough, The Crowood Press; ) [Google Scholar]
  7. Bentley, P.J. , 1998. 3rd ed. Comparative vertebrate endocrinology. UK, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. BielińAska, H. , Herbut, E. 2002. Effect of access to swimming water on welfare of White KołSuda®geese. Ann. Anim. Sci., No. 1. 67–70.
  9. Bogenfürst, F. , 1992. Lúdtenyésztők kézikönyve. [Handbook for goose breeders] Budapest, Új Nap Lap‐ és Könyvkiadó. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bogenfürst F., Kozák J., Mihók S., Szász S., 1997. Feltételrendszer a lúdtépéséhez és a tépöludak tartásához (Standard for harvesting feathers and for keeping harvesting geese). April, 1997. pp. 1–9.
  11. Bogenfürst, F. , 2000. Lúdtenyésztés. [Goose breeding]. In: Horn P. (szerk.): Állattenyésztés 2. Baromfi, haszongalamb. [Animal Breeding. Vol 2. Poultry, Pigeon]. p. 225–280. (Budapest, Mezőgazda Kiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  12. Bögre, J. , 1968. Lúdtenyésztés. (Goose Breeding). In: Bögre J. (szerk.): Kacsa‐, lúd‐, pulyka‐ és gyöngytyúktenyésztés kézikönyve. (Handbook of Duck, Goose, Turkey and Guineafowl) p. 115–224. (Budapest, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  13. Bögre, J. , 1981. Lúdtenyésztés. (Goose Breeding). In: Bögre J. (ed.): Baromfitenyésztők kézikönyve. (Handbook of Poultry Breeders) p. 559–625. (Budapest, Mezőgazda Kiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  14. Bögre, J. , Bogenfürst, F. , 1971. A 0–12 hetes növendékludak tollazatának testtájankénti fejlődése és a fejlődés szakaszos jellege. (Feather Development of Twelve Weeks Young Geese at the Different Body Parts and Their Section Specifics) Baromfiipar, 18:109–122. [Google Scholar]
  15. Boissy, A. , Manteuffel, G. , Jensen, M.B. , Moe, R.O. , Spruijt, B. , Keeling, L.J. , Winckler, C. , Forkman, B. , Dimitrov, I. , Langbein, J. , Bakken, M. , Viessier, I. , Aubert, A. , 2007. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol. Behav. 92, 375–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Broom, D.M. 1986. Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal, 142: 524–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Broom, D.M. 1991. Assessing welfare and suffering. Behavioural Processes, 25:117–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Broom D.M. 1998. Welfare, stress and the evolution of feelings. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 27: 371–403. [Google Scholar]
  19. Broom, D.M. 2001a. Coping, stress and welfare. In: Coping with Challenge: Welfare in Animals including Humans. (Ed). Broom D.M., 1–9. Berlin: Dahlem University Press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Broom, D.M. 2001b. Evolution of pain. In Pain: its nature and management in man and animals, ed. Soulsby, Lord and Morton, D. Royal Society of Medicine International Congress Symposium Series, 246, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  21. Broom, D.M. , 2006a. Adaptation. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 119, 1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Broom, D.M. 2006b. Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 97, 71–83. [Google Scholar]
  23. Broom, D.M. and Johnson, K.G. , 2000. Stress and Animal Welfare, 221. Springer/Kluwer:Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  24. Broom, D.M. and Kirkden, R.D. , 2004. Welfare, stress, behaviour and pathophysiology. In: Veterinary Pathophysiology, 337–369. (Eds). Dunlop, R.H. and Malbert, C.H. Ames Iowa: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  25. Broom, D.M. and Fraser, A.F. 2007. Domestic Animal Behaviour and Welfare, 4th edn. Wallingford: CABI. [Google Scholar]
  26. Buckland, R. , Guy, G. , 2002. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper. 154. ISBN: 9251048622) Edited by Buckland Roger, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; and Gérard Guy, Institut de la recherche agronomique, SEPFG d'Artiguères, France [Google Scholar]
  27. Classen, H.L. , Riddell, C. and Robinson, F.E. , 1991. Effects of increasing photoperiod length on performance and health of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 32: 21–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Columella, L.I.M. , 2005. A mezőgazdaságról. [From the Agriculture]. Szeged, Lectum, Kiadó: [Google Scholar]
  29. Council of Europe , 1999. T‐AP (95)5 adopted version. Standing Committe of the European Convention for Protection Concerning domestic geese (Anser anser f. domesticus, Anser cygnoides f. domesticus) and their crossbreeds. pp. 1–12.
  30. Dawson, A. , 2006. Control of moult in birds: Association with prolactin and gonadal regression in starlings. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 147, 314–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dawson, A. , 2008. The effects of day length and testosterone on the initiation and progress of moult in Starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Ibis 136, 335–340. [Google Scholar]
  32. Deaton, J.W. , Reece F.N., McNaughton J.L. and Lott B.D., 1981. Effects of light intensity and low‐level intermittent lighting on broiler performance during a high density limited‐area brooding period. Poultry Science, 60: 2385–2387. [Google Scholar]
  33. Del Hoyo, J. , Elliott, A. , Sargatal, J. , 1992. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 1. Ostrich to Ducks. (Barcelona, SPAIN, Lynx Edicions; ) [Google Scholar]
  34. Dorward, P. , 1970. Response pattern of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in domestic duck. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiologu 35: 729–735. [Google Scholar]
  35. Duncan, I.J.H. , 1996. Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science, Supplement 27, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  36. EDFA. , 2009. Press Statement about the subject “feather harvesting”. 11.02.2009. Juliane Hedderich. www.sanders.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/edfa_briefbogen_eng.pdf [Google Scholar]
  37. EFSA , 2009. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from European Commission on the overall effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. The EFSA Journal (2009) 1143, 1–38 [Google Scholar]
  38. FAO , 2002. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Goose Production. Chapter 10. Feather and Down Production. Invited papers: Rosinski. Goose production in Poland and Eastern Europe‐ Feather and down production.
  39. Fraser, D. and Matthews, L.R. , 1997. Preference and motivation testing. In: Animal Welfare. Appleby MC, Hughes BO (eds). Oxon: CAB International. 159–73. [Google Scholar]
  40. Fraser, D. and Duncan, I.J.H. , 1998. ‘Pleasures’, ‘pains’ and animal welfare: Toward a natural history of affect. Animal Welfare. 7, 383–396. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gentle, M.J. , 1989. Cutaneous sensory afferents recorded from the nerve intra mandibularis of Gallus gallus var domesticus. Journal of Comparative physiology A 164: 763–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gentle, M.J. , 1992. Pain in birds. Animal Welfare 1: 235–247. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gentle, M.J. , 2001. Attentional shifts alter pain perception in the chicken. Animal Welfare 10: S187–194. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gentle, M.J. , Hunter, L.N. , 1990. Physiological and behavioural responses associated with feather removal in Gallus gallus var domesticus. Research in Veterinary Science 50: 95–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gentle, M.J. , Tilston, V.L. , 2000. Nociceptors in the legs of poultry: implications for potential pain in pre‐slaughter shackling. Animal Welfare 9: 227–236. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gentle, M.J. , Tilston, V.L. , McKeegan, D.E.F. , 2001. Mechanothermal nociceptors in the scaly skin of the chicken leg. Neuroscience 106: 643–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gregory, N.G. , Wilkins, L.J. , 1989. Broken bones in the domestic fowl: handling and processing damage in end‐of‐lay battery hens. British Poultry Science 30: 555–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Grow, O. , 1972. Modern Waterfowl Management and Breeding Guide. (U.S.A. Augusta, NJ, American Bantam Association; ) [Google Scholar]
  49. Héjja, S. , 1984. Ha lúd, legyen kövér! Libagondozók és libahizlalók könyve (Might as well be hung for a sheep as a lumb. Book of goose keepers and goose fatteners.) (Budapest, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó; ) [Google Scholar]
  50. Herre, W. , Röhrs, M. , 1973. Haustiere, zoologisch gesehen. Stuttgart: Fischer. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hirschenhauser, K.E. , Möstl, E. , Kotrschal, K. , 1999. Seasonal patterns of sex steroids determined from feces in different social categories of Greylag geese (Anser anser). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 114, 67–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Holloway, J.A. , Trouth, C.O. , Weight, L.E. , Keyner, G.F. , 1980. Cutaneous receptive field characteristics of primary afferents and dorsal horn cells in the avian (Gallus domesticus). Experimental Neurology 68: 477–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hreblay, E. , 1901. Lud‐ és kacsatenyésztés. [Goose and Duck Breeding]. Budapest, Pallas Részvénytársaság Nyomdája. [Google Scholar]
  54. Hughes, B. O. Black, A. J. , 1974. Effect of environmental factors on activity, selected behaviour patterns and ‘fear’ of fowls in cages and pens. British Poultry Science. 1974. 15: No.4, 375–380. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hughes, B.O. and Duncan, I.J.H. (1988a). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 20: 352–355. [Google Scholar]
  56. IDFL , 2009. Finding the truth about “live‐plucking” and “harvesting”.
  57. Janan, J. , Bódi, L. , Kozák, J. , Ács, I. , Karsai, K. M. , 1997a. Effect of light and feeding regimes on food intake, body weight and egg production of geese bred for fatty liver. 11th European Symposium on Waterfowl, Nantes, France, September 8–10 1997. 424–429. [Google Scholar]
  58. Janan, J. , Bódi, L. , Kozák, J. , Ács, I. , Karsainé, K. M. , Orosz, Sz. , Rudas, P. , 1997b. A ludak egyes élettani paramétereinek alakulása különböző tartási és takarmányozási rendszerek hatására (The level of some physiological parameter during different feeding and keeping systems. Abstract, in Hungarian language). A Magyar Élettani Társaság LXII. (Meeting of the Hungarian Physiological Society) Vándorgyűlése Pécs, Hungary, 1997. július 9‐12. 145.
  59. Janan, J. , Bódi, L. , Bárdos, L. , Oppel, K. , Karsainé Kovács, M. , 2001a. A tolltépés hatása a ludak vérglükózszintjére. [Effect of feather plucking in geese'blood glucose level.] Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja, 123: 354–359. [Google Scholar]
  60. Janan, J. , Bódi L., Karsainé K. M. 2001b. A tolltépés és a stressz (The harvesting of feather and stress). Baromfiágazat 4. (2), 60–62 [Google Scholar]
  61. Janan, J. , Rudas P., Szikora Zs., Bódi L., 2003. A tolltépés hatása a vér plazma kortikoszteron szintjére ludakban. [The effect of harvesting of feather on blood corticosterone level in geese]. p. 1. In: MTA Állatorvos tudományi Bizottsága (szerk.): Akadémiai beszámolók. (Annual conference of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary Physiology, Biochemistry and Pathophysiology Section) p. 29 [Google Scholar]
  62. Járvás, K. , Béres, A. , Janan, J. , 2008. A tolltépés okozta stressz vizsgálata ludakban. [Examination of the stress by feather plucking in geese]. Animal welfare, etológia és tartástechnológia / Animal welfare, ethology and housing systems. 4. 2. 337–343. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kelly, K.W. 1980. Stress and immune function: a bibliographic review. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires, 11, 445–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Koch, M. , Mostl, E. , Steinmetz, H.W. , Clauss, M. , Masello, J.F. , Quillfeldt, P. , 2009. Non‐invasive measurement of faecal glucocorticoid metabolites in Upland Geese Chloephaga picta. Polar Biology 32 (2): 281–285. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kotrschal, K. , Scheiber, I.B.R. , Hirschenhauser, K. , 2010. Individual Performance in Complex Social Systems: The Greylag Goose Example. In: Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms/. Kappeler P. (ed.). 121–148. Springer Verlag; Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kozák, J. , 1999. Magyarország baromfigazdasága és szabályozásának EU‐konformitása. Baromfitartás, piacszabályozás, állatvédelem. (Poultry Industry of Hungary and its EU‐conform Regulation. Technologies, market regulation and animal welfare). (Budapest, Agroinform Kiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  67. Kozák, J. , Bódi, L. , Ács, I. , Monostori, K , Karsai, M. , 1995. Changes in prolificacy and feather producing characteristics of Hungarian Upgraded and Grey Landes geese. pp. 201–209. In: Füleky Gy. (Editor‐in‐Chief): BULLETIN of the University of Agricultural Sciences, Gödöllő, Gödöllői Agrártudományi Egyetem. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kozák, J. , Vargáné, S.Sz. , Kawada, T. , 1999. Examination of down‐feather of geese from the third plucking. 137–141.p. In: Proceedings 12th European Symposium on Waterfowl, Adana Turkey, 18–20 October 1999. University of Cukurava, Faculty of Agriculture Press, pp. 137‐141. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kozák, J. , Monostori, K. , Ács, I. , Pécsi, A. , 2010a. Postnatal feather cycle of Hungarian Upgraded Goose goslings. (pp 1–7) en.engormix.com/MA‐poultry‐industry/health/articles/timing‐feather‐plucking‐natural_1470.htm. [Publication date: 09/02/2010]. [Accessed: 20/02/2010]
  70. Kozák, J. , Monostori, K , Karsai, M. , Pécsi, A. , 2010b. Timing feather plucking to natural moult in Gray Landes Geese Poultry industry technical publication. en.engormix.com/MA‐poultry‐industry/healt/articles/timing‐feather‐plucking‐natural_1469.htm [Published data: 09/02/2010.] [Accessed: 20/02/2010]
  71. Kralj‐Fiser, S. , Weiss, B.M. , Kotrschal, K. , 2010. Behavioural and physiological correlates of personality in greylag geese (Anser anser). Journal of Ethology 28 (2): 363–370. [Google Scholar]
  72. Lacza, B. , 1962. Lúdtenyésztés. [Goose Breeding]. Budapest, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lucas, A.M. , Stettenheim, P.R. , 1972. Avian Anatomy Integument. Part II. Washington DC, United States Department of Agriculture. [Google Scholar]
  74. Manser, C.E. 1996. Effects of lighting on the welfare of domestic poultry: a review. Animal Welfare, 5, 341–360. [Google Scholar]
  75. MARD , 1997. (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development: MARD). FVM r. Az Állategészségügyi Szabályzat kiadásáról.(MARD Decree 41/1997 (V.28.) on the issue on the subject of Animal Health Regulation) Mezőgazdasági és Élelmezésügyi Értesítő, 48: 690–1000. [Google Scholar]
  76. MARD , 1999. Regulations on the plucking of geese. In: Annex 5 to Decree 32/1999 (III.31.) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development pp26‐27. 32/1999. (III.31.) FVM r. A mezőgazdasági haszonállatok tartásának állatvédelmi szabályairól. (MARD Decree 32/1999. (III. 31.) on rules keeping of agricultural animals). Földművelésügyi és Vidékfejlesztési Értesítő 50: 1299–1308. [Google Scholar]
  77. MARD , 2009. A földművelésügyi és vidékfejlesztési miniszter 178/2009. (XII. 29.) FVM rendelete a mezőgazdasági haszonállatok tartásának állatvédelmi szabályairól szóló 32/1999. (III. 31.) FVM rendelet módosításáról. [The MARD 178/2009. (XII. 29.) Decree of the Minister Agriculture and Rural Development on the correction No. 32/1999. (III. 31.) on the domestic animal keeping and animal protection]. Magyar Közlöny, No. 194: 47907–47924.
  78. Matull, A. and Reiter, K. (1995). Investigations of comfort behaviour of pekin duck, muskovy duck and mallard duck. 10th European Symposium on waterfowl, Halle, 118–121. [Google Scholar]
  79. MÉM , 1975. (Mezőgazdasági és Élelmezésügyi Minisztérium) A nagyüzemi baromfitartás állategészségügyi irányelvei. [The main guidelines of animal healthcare in the large scale poultry production system]. (Budapest, Mezőgazdasági és Élelmezésügyi Minisztérium Tájékoztatási Főosztály; ). [Google Scholar]
  80. Ménesi, J. , Szekér, I. , Takáts, K. , 1964. Baromfitoll. [The Poultry Feather]. (Budapest, Műszaki Könyvkiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  81. Millan, M.J. , 1999. The induction of pain: an integrative review. Progress in Neurobiology 57: 1–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Nagy N, Szabóné Willin E., Tőzsér J., 1996. A gazdasági állatok értékmérő tulajdonságai. [Productive traits of domestic animals]. pp. 174–199. In: Nagy N. (szerk.) Az állattenyésztés alapjai. [Bases of Animal Breeding] (Budapest, Mezőgazda Kiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  83. Nagyváthy, N. , 1820. Magyar házi gazdaasszony. [The Hungarian House Wife] (Pesten Trattner János Tamás betűivel és költségeivel).
  84. National Standard , 1989. MSZ 6986–1989 Nyers, tépett libatoll (Crude goose feather). Magyar Népköztársaság, Országos Szabvány, Budapest, Magyar Szabványügyi Hivatal (Hungarian Bureau of Standards), pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  85. Necker, R , Reiner, B. , 1980. Temperature‐sensitive mechanoreceptors, thermoreceptors and heat nociceptors in the feather skin of pigeons. Journal of Comparative Physiology 135: 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  86. Newberry, R.C. , Hunt J.R and Gardiner E.E., 1988. Influence of light intensity on behaviour and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 67: 1020–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Ostmann, O.W. , Ringer, R.K. , Tetzlaff, M. , 1963a. The anatomy of the feather follicle and its immediate surroundings. Poultry Science 42: 957–969. [Google Scholar]
  88. Ostmann, O.W. , Ringer, R.K. , Tetzlaff, M. , 1963b. The effect of various neuromimetc, anaesthetic and tranquilizing drugs on feather release. Poultry Science 42; 969–973. [Google Scholar]
  89. Pacs, I. , 1968. A ludak tolltermelő képességének vizsgálata. [Feather Production, Examination of Geese]. pp. 103–110. In: Manczel J. (ed.): Az Agrártudományi Egyetem Közleményei, Mezőgazdaságtudományi Kar, (Gödöllő, Mezőgazdasági Könyvkiadó Vállalat; ). [Google Scholar]
  90. Pálffy, D. , 1980. Lúdárutermelés (Pecsenyelúd, húslúd, májliba és lúdtoll előállítása, feldolgozása). [Goose Production. (Broiler Goose, Meat, Liver, Feather Production and Processing] (Budapest, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  91. Pingel, H , 1990. Genetics of growth and meat production in waterfowl. In.: Grawford, RD . (ed.): Poultry Breeding and Genetics. pp. 691–704. (Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V; ). [Google Scholar]
  92. Pingel, H , 1993. Genetics of growth and meat production in waterfowl. pp. 691–704. In: Crawford, R.D. (ed.): Poultry Breeding and Genetics. (Amsterdam‐Oxford‐New York‐ Tokyo, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.). [Google Scholar]
  93. Pingel, H , 2004. Duck and Geese Production around the world. World Poultry, 20 (8) pp. 26–28. (Germany, Institute of animal breeding and husbandry with veterinary clinic; ). [Google Scholar]
  94. Pisa, P.E. , Scheiber, B.R. , Ferrero, E.A. , Kotrschal, K. , 2006. Grelag ganders show active and passive dominance styles. Journal of Ornithology 147 (5): 231–231. [Google Scholar]
  95. Rutherford, K.M.D. , 2002. Assessing pain in animals. Animal Welfare 11: 31–53. [Google Scholar]
  96. Sanford, J. , Ewbank, R. , Molony, V. , Tavenor, W.D. , Uvarov, O. , 1986. Guidelines for the recognition and assessment of pain in animals. Veterinary Record 188: 334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Schneider, K.H. , 1991. Studie zum Lebendraufen von Gänsen. (Leipzig. Schreib‐maschinen‐Manuskript; ). 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  98. Schneider, K.H. , 1995. Gänse. Eine Anleitung über ihre Züchtung, Haltung, Fütterung und Nutzung. (Berlin, Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag Berlin GmbH; ). [Google Scholar]
  99. Schwark H.J., Mazanowski A., Peter V., 1987. Internationales Handbuch der Tierproduktion ‐Geflügel. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  100. Stresemann, E. , Stresemann, V. , 1966. Die Mauser der Vögel. J. Ornithol. 107, 1–445. [Google Scholar]
  101. Szado, J. , Pakulska, E. , Kapkowska, E. , 1995. Influence of production factors on feather quality. Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl. World's Poultry Science Association. March 26–31, 1995 Halle (Saale), Germany, pp. 331–341. [Google Scholar]
  102. Szentirmay, L. , 1968. Lúdtartás, ‐nevelés, ‐hizlalás. (Goose Keeping, Growing and Fattening) (Budapest, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  103. Szigeti, M. , 1987. Hulladékhasznosítás helyzete a baromfiiparban. (Poultry Waste Utilisation in Poultry Industry) Baromfitenyésztés és Feldolgozás, 34 (Különszám) 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  104. Toates, F. and Jensen, P. 1991. Ethological and psychological models of motivation: towards a synthesis In: Farm Animals to Animats ed: Meyer J A and Wilson S 194–205 MIT Press: Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  105. Tomczyk, G , Bednarek, D. , Minta, 2009. Non‐specific immunity and body weight gain of commercial goose after plucking ‐ XXI International Poultry Symposium‐7‐9.09.2009 Szklarska Poręba, Poland. [Google Scholar]
  106. Tóth, P. , 1956. A baromfitenyésztés kézikönyve. [Handbook of Poultry Husbandry]. (Budapest, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  107. Tóth, S. , 1989. Economy of selection of geese for feather production. pp. 81–85. In: Füleky, Gy. (editor‐in‐chief): BULLETIN of the University of Agricultural Sciences, Gödöllő, Gödöllői Agrártudományi Egyetem. [Google Scholar]
  108. Tóth‐Baranyi, I. , 1957. Baromfiipari ismeretek. [Poultry Industry Knowledges]. (Budapest, Műszaki Könyvkiadó; ). [Google Scholar]
  109. Tóth, S. , Szélné Szeri, M. , Nguyen, D.V. , 1988. A ludak tolltermelését befolyásoló tényezők. (Factors affecting feather production of geese). Állattenyésztés és Takarmányozás, 37 (2) 174–179. [Google Scholar]
  110. Pfoten Vier, 2009. Tierhalteverbot für Gänsequäler Schwerk. www.vier‐pfoten.de/website/ouput._php?id=1231&printable=1&idcontent=3042 [Accessed 22/07/2009].
  111. Welty, J.C. , 1982. 3rd ed. The life of birds. Philadelphia, etc., Saunders College Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  112. Vestergaard, K.S. , 1996. Assessing animal welfare: the significance of causal studies of behaviour at the motivational level. Acta Agric. Scand. A, Anim. Sci. Suppl. 27, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
  113. Wilton, G.C. , 2000. 5th ed. Avian physiology. San Diego, Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  114. Winkelmann, R.K. , Myers, T.T. , 1961. The histochemistry and morphology og the cutaneous sensory end‐organs of the chicken. Journal of Comparative Neurology 117: 27–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Winkler, J. , 1926. A lúd és kacsa tenyésztése. [Goose and Duck Breeding]. Budapest, “Pátria” Irodalmi Vállalat és Nyomdai R.‐T. [Google Scholar]

Articles from EFSA Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES