Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1997 May;47(418):275–279.

Guidelines for dyspepsia management in general practice using focus groups.

A P Hungin 1, G P Rubin 1, A J Russell 1, B Convery 1
PMCID: PMC1312999  PMID: 9219401

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of published guidelines on managing dyspepsia in general practice. Existing guidelines emphasize the role of investigations and drugs rather than management approaches. Focus groups are a means of uncovering the way in which the participants think and work in the pragmatic-setting, and have not previously been formally used in creating guidelines. AIM: To develop guidelines for the management of dyspepsia and to assess the use of focus groups of general practitioners (GPs) in order to do so. METHOD: Initial evidence-based guidelines were proposed by a group of four GPs with an audit facilitator, and used for discussion in three focus groups using a standard format. An anthropological analysis of the proceedings led to modifications of the original guidelines, based on knowledge, perceptions and attitudes. The study was set in three distinct locations involving 30 GPs. The outcome measures consisted of feedback, categorized by types of responses, from the analysis of the focus groups and the creation of guidelines. RESULTS: The resulting guidelines were patient centred and based on the principles of good consultation. They encompassed patients' fears and doctors' clinical uncertainties, and allowed flexibility in the individual patient's management. The focus group methodology exposed a substantial number of GPs to guideline development, and had the added benefits of dissemination, peer review and educational challenge. CONCLUSION: It was possible to develop guidelines for dyspepsia using focus groups. The methodology had the added benefits of ownership, peer review, exposure of educational gaps and locality factors, and dissemination of good practice. It included steps from evidence review to implementation strategies. The development of this technique could lead to a strategy towards the creation and application of evidence-based and professionally acceptable clinical guidelines and practice on a locality basis nationally.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (49.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axon A. T., Bell G. D., Jones R. H., Quine M. A., McCloy R. F. Guidelines on appropriate indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Working Party of the Joint Committee of the Royal College of Physicians of London, Royal College of Surgeons of England, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Association of Surgeons, the British Society of Gastroenterology, and the Thoracic Society of Great Britain. BMJ. 1995 Apr 1;310(6983):853–856. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6983.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbour R. S. Using focus groups in general practice research. Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;12(3):328–334. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.3.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Conroy M., Shannon W. Clinical guidelines: their implementation in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jul;45(396):371–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Delaney B. C. Role of Helicobacter pylori in gastrointestinal disease: implications for primary care of a revolution in management of dyspepsia. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Sep;45(398):489–494. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher J. A., Surridge J. G., Vartan C. P., Loehry C. A. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy--a GP service. Br Med J. 1977 Nov 5;2(6096):1199–1201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6096.1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gear M. W., Barnes R. J. Endoscopic studies of dyspepsia in a general practice. Br Med J. 1980 May 3;280(6223):1136–1137. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6223.1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gear M. W., Wilkinson S. P. Open-access upper alimentary endoscopy. Br J Hosp Med. 1989 May;41(5):438, 440, 442-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goulston K. J., Dent O. F., Mant A., Logan J., Ngu M. Use of H2-receptor antagonists in patients with dyspepsia and heartburn: a cost comparison. Med J Aust. 1991 Jul 1;155(1):20–26. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1991.tb116372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greco P. J., Eisenberg J. M. Changing physicians' practices. N Engl J Med. 1993 Oct 21;329(17):1271–1273. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199310213291714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greer A. L. The state of the art versus the state of the science. The diffusion of new medical technologies into practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4(1):5–26. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300003202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hallissey M. T., Allum W. H., Jewkes A. J., Ellis D. J., Fielding J. W. Early detection of gastric cancer. BMJ. 1990 Sep 15;301(6751):513–515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6751.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harvey R. F., Salih S. Y., Read A. E. Organic and functional disorders in 2000 gastroenterology outpatients. Lancet. 1983 Mar 19;1(8325):632–634. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91802-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heading R. C. Definitions of dyspepsia. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1991;182:1–6. doi: 10.3109/00365529109109529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heatley R. V., Rathbone B. J. Dyspepsia: a dilemma for doctors? Lancet. 1987 Oct 3;2(8562):779–782. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92509-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holdstock G., Wiseman M., Loehry C. A. Open-access endoscopy service for general practitioners. Br Med J. 1979 Feb 17;1(6161):457–459. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6161.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Horrocks J. C., De Dombal F. T. Clinical presentation of patients with "dyspepsia". Detailed symptomatic study of 360 patients. Gut. 1978 Jan;19(1):19–26. doi: 10.1136/gut.19.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hungin A. P., Thomas P. R., Bramble M. G., Corbett W. A., Idle N., Contractor B. R., Berridge D. C., Cann G. What happens to patients following open access gastroscopy? An outcome study from general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Nov;44(388):519–521. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones R., Lydeard S. Irritable bowel syndrome in the general population. BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):87–90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones R. What happens to patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia after endoscopy? Practitioner. 1988 Jan;232(1441):75-6, 78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kelbaek H., Linde J., Eriksen J., Mungaard S., Moesgaard F., Bonnevie O. Controlled clinical trial of treatment with cimetidine for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Acta Med Scand. 1985;217(3):281–287. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1985.tb02696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299–302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lydeard S., Jones R. Factors affecting the decision to consult with dyspepsia: comparison of consulters and non-consulters. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Dec;39(329):495–498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mittman B. S., Tonesk X., Jacobson P. D. Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Dec;18(12):413–422. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30567-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Naji S. A., Brunt P. W., Hagen S., Mowat N. A., Russell I. T., Sinclair T. S., Tang T. M. Improving the selection of patients for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut. 1993 Feb;34(2):187–191. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nyrén O., Adami H. O., Bates S., Bergström R., Gustavsson S., Löf L., Nyberg A. Absence of therapeutic benefit from antacids or cimetidine in non-ulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med. 1986 Feb 6;314(6):339–343. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198602063140603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sue-Ling H. M., Johnston D., Martin I. G., Dixon M. F., Lansdown M. R., McMahon M. J., Axon A. T. Gastric cancer: a curable disease in Britain. BMJ. 1993 Sep 4;307(6904):591–596. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6904.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Talley N. J., Fung L. H., Gilligan I. J., McNeil D., Piper D. W. Association of anxiety, neuroticism, and depression with dyspepsia of unknown cause. A case-control study. Gastroenterology. 1986 Apr;90(4):886–892. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90864-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Talley N. J., Zinsmeister A. R., Schleck C. D., Melton L. J., 3rd Dyspepsia and dyspepsia subgroups: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1992 Apr;102(4 Pt 1):1259–1268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Winkler J. D., Lohr K. N., Brook R. H. Persuasive communication and medical technology assessment. Arch Intern Med. 1985 Feb;145(2):314–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES