Abstract
Lactobacillus buchneri is a technological additive intended to improve the ensiling process at a proposed dose of 1.0 × 108 CFU/kg fresh material. The bacterial species L. buchneri is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach. As the identity of the strain has been clearly established and as no antibiotic resistance was detected, the use of the strain in the production of silage is considered safe for livestock species, consumers of products from animals fed the treated silage and for the environment. Evidence of a lack of irritancy was provided for one formulation of the additive. It is unlikely that given the nature of the alternative food grade excipients, different results would be obtained for other formulations containing this strain of L. buchneri. However, the proteinaceous nature of the active agent means its potential to be a skin/respiratory sensitizer cannot be excluded. Five studies with laboratory‐scale silos are described, each lasting at least 90 days, made using samples of forage covering a range of dry matter content (20 to 71 %) with differing water‐soluble carbohydrate content. In each case, replicate silos containing treated forage were compared to identical silos containing the same untreated forage and, after opening, the period before deterioration became evident was measured. The results showed that the additive containing this specific strain of L. buchneri has the potential to improve the production of silage from all forages by increasing acetic acid production resulting in an extended aerobic stability of the treated silage.
Keywords: Technological additive, silage additive, Lactobacillus buchneri, QPS, safety, efficacy
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) ; Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri DSM 22963 as a silage additive for all species. EFSA Journal 2011;9(4):2138. [11 pp.] doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2138.
Panel members: Gabriele Aquilina, Georges Bories, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Joop de Knecht, Noël Albert Dierick, Mikolaj Antoni Gralak, Jürgen Gropp, Ingrid Halle, Christer Hogstrand, Reinhard Kroker, Lubomir Leng, Secundino Lopez Puente, Anne‐Katrine Lundebye Haldorsen, Alberto Mantovani, Giovanna Martelli, Miklós Mézes, Derek Renshaw, Maria Saarela, Kristen Sejrsen and Johannes Westendorf
Correspondence: feedap@efsa.europa.eu
Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Silage for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion.
Adoption date: 7 April 2011
Published date: 14 April 2011
Question number: EFSA‐Q‐2010‐01276
On request from: European Commission
References
- EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2007. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA. The EFSA Journal, 587, 1–16 [Google Scholar]
- EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2008. Technical guidance prepared by the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) on the update of the criteria used in the assessment of bacterial resistance to antibiotics of human or veterinary importance. The EFSA Journal, 732, 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2010. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2010 update. EFSA Journal; 8(12):1944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
