Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1997 May;47(418):297–300.

How general practitioners manage children with urinary tract infection: an audit in the former Northern Region.

S Vernon 1, C K Foo 1, M G Coulthard 1
PMCID: PMC1313004  PMID: 9219406

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) in childhood are common and may be difficult to diagnose because of non-specific symptoms and technical problems with urine collection. Active management is important because UTIs may cause permanent renal scarring in young children. AIM: To determine how general practitioners (GPs) manage children with suspected UTIs. METHOD: A postal questionnaire to 494 GPs in the former Northern Region (a random selection of 26.2%) asking how they manage children with suspected UTI and their perception of their training needs. RESULTS: A total of 333 (67.4%) GPs replied. On weekdays, up to 22.9% of GPs treated children who had symptoms suggestive of UTI without collecting a diagnostic urine sample, and up to 64.8% did so at weekends. Urine collection was satisfactory in 73.2% of boys and girls aged under one year, but in only 50.4% of older boys and 48.0% of older girls, caused in part by the use of unreliably 'cleaned' potties in the older group. On weekdays, up to 87.2% of GPs culture the urine, but up to 4.8% use dipsticks as the sole diagnostic test; at weekends, only up to 58.6% culture urines, and up to 19.1% rely on dipsticks alone. Up to 11.0% of GPs examine urine under a microscope for bacteria to test for UTI on weekdays and at weekends. Up to 23.8% of GPs who collect urines on weekdays wait for a positive culture result before starting antibiotics. At weekends, only 3.9% of GPs build in this delay to treatment, mainly because far fewer take urine samples at all. GPs refer younger children for diagnostic imaging more readily than older ones, and boys more readily than girls at all ages. Although virtually all GPs refer all children under five years, some still do so only after recurrent infections. Over half the GPs wanted more training in managing UTI in children. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variation in clinical practice by GPs. Some always appropriately collect and test urine samples, treat without delay and refer for imaging after one proven UTI. Some never collect urines, treat blindly and refer only young infants with recurrent UTIs. Many vary their standards of practice from weekdays to weekends. The provision for GPs of clear, local, practical guidelines, drawn up between paediatricians and GPs and backed up with study days, might produce a consistent improvement in standards.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (44.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahmad T., Vickers D., Campbell S., Coulthard M. G., Pedler S. Urine collection from disposable nappies. Lancet. 1991 Sep 14;338(8768):674–676. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91242-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jacobson S. H., Eklöf O., Eriksson C. G., Lins L. E., Tidgren B., Winberg J. Development of hypertension and uraemia after pyelonephritis in childhood: 27 year follow up. BMJ. 1989 Sep 16;299(6701):703–706. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6701.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jadresic L., Cartwright K., Cowie N., Witcombe B., Stevens D. Investigation of urinary tract infection in childhood. BMJ. 1993 Sep 25;307(6907):761–764. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6907.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jewkes F. E., McMaster D. J., Napier W. A., Houston I. B., Postlethwaite R. J. Home collection of urine specimens--boric acid bottles or Dipslides? Arch Dis Child. 1990 Mar;65(3):286–289. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.3.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumar R. K., Turner G. M., Coulthard M. G. Don't count on urinary white cells to diagnose childhood urinary tract infection. BMJ. 1996 May 25;312(7042):1359–1359. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7042.1359a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Powell H. R., McCredie D. A., Ritchie M. A. Urinary nitrite in symptomatic and asymptomatic urinary infection. Arch Dis Child. 1987 Feb;62(2):138–140. doi: 10.1136/adc.62.2.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rees J. C., Vernon S., Pedler S. J., Coulthard M. G. Collection of urine from washed-up potties. Lancet. 1996 Jul 20;348(9021):197–197. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66144-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. STANSFELD J. M. The measurement and meaning of pyuria. Arch Dis Child. 1962 Jun;37:257–262. doi: 10.1136/adc.37.193.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smellie J. M., Poulton A., Prescod N. P. Retrospective study of children with renal scarring associated with reflux and urinary infection. BMJ. 1994 May 7;308(6938):1193–1196. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6938.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smellie J. M., Ransley P. G., Normand I. C., Prescod N., Edwards D. Development of new renal scars: a collaborative study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jun 29;290(6486):1957–1960. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6486.1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Turner G. M., Coulthard M. G. Fever can cause pyuria in children. BMJ. 1995 Oct 7;311(7010):924–924. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7010.924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vernon S., Redfearn A., Pedler S. J., Lambert H. J., Coulthard M. G. Urine collection on sanitary towels. Lancet. 1994 Aug 27;344(8922):612–612. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91996-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vickers D., Ahmad T., Coulthard M. G. Diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children: fresh urine microscopy or culture? Lancet. 1991 Sep 28;338(8770):767–770. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90662-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wing A. J., Brunner F. P. Twenty-three years of dialysis and transplantation in Europe: experiences of the EDTA Registry. Am J Kidney Dis. 1989 Nov;14(5):341–346. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(89)80165-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES