Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1997 Jun;47(419):353–357.

Determining priorities for change in primary care: the value of practice-based needs assessment.

D A Ruta 1, M C Duffy 1, A Farquharson 1, A M Young 1, F B Gilmour 1, S P McElduff 1
PMCID: PMC1313025  PMID: 9231468

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary care is being expected to expand the range of services it provides, and to take on many of the tasks traditionally provided in secondary care. At the same time, general practitioners (GPs) will become increasingly responsible for assessing their patients' health care needs and commissioning care from other providers. This article describes an approach taken in one general practice to meet these difficult challenges. AIM: To examine whether information on health and health care needs, when used as the basis for a priority setting exercise, can provide a useful first step in planning primary care provision within a practice. METHOD: A three-stage process of information-gathering from a number of sources, including continuous data recording of patient contacts and a postal survey of all adults registered with the practice, identification of key findings and discussion of associated issues, and priority setting of proposals for practice development using the nominal group technique. RESULTS: Continuous data recording of patient contacts with GPs and the practice nurse provided data on 4489 GP contacts with 2027 patients, 1000 district nurse contacts with 101 patients, and 361 health visitor contacts with 172 clients. More than 70% of patient records had been computerized, with 600 diagnostic READ codes identified and 11,500 separate entries made. The socioeconomic and health survey questionnaire achieved an 84% response rate. Following the priority-setting exercise, 28 proposed practice developments were identified. These were reduced to a final list of eight. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive method of practice-based needs assessment, when used as the basis for some form of priority setting, has great potential in helping to plan primary care services within a practice. The success of such initiatives will require a substantial investment of resources in primary care and fundamental changes to the way in which primary care is funded.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (49.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bain J. General practices and the new contract. I--Reactions and impact. BMJ. 1991 May 18;302(6786):1183–1186. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6786.1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chambers R., Belcher J. Work patterns of general practitioners before and after the introduction of the 1990 contract. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Oct;43(375):410–412. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coulter A. Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care. BMJ. 1995 Dec 2;311(7018):1447–1448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gallagher M., Hares T., Spencer J., Bradshaw C., Webb I. The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice? Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):76–81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.1.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garratt A. M., Ruta D. A., Abdalla M. I., Buckingham J. K., Russell I. T. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1440–1444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ham C. Priority setting in the NHS: reports from six districts. BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):435–438. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hopton J. L., Dlugolecka M. Patients' perceptions of need for primary health care services: useful for priority setting? BMJ. 1995 May 13;310(6989):1237–1240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6989.1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leese B., Bosanquet N. Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics. BMJ. 1995 Aug 26;311(7004):546–550. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7004.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murray S. A., Graham L. J. Practice based health needs assessment: use of four methods in a small neighbourhood. BMJ. 1995 Jun 3;310(6992):1443–1448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6992.1443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Newrick D. C., Spencer J. A., Jones K. P. Collecting data in general practice: need for standardisation. BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):33–34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7022.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Short J. A. Has nursing lost its way? Dual perspective. BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):303–304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES