Abstract
Despite the rapid growth in routine computerized data collection within the National Health Service (NHS), and the increased use of such data for generating hospital statistics and doctor activity rates, few validation studies exist. During a study of 158 acute medical admissions, and examination of hospital data revealed numerous and systematic inaccuracies. If general practitioner (GP) performance statistics are to be reliably based on such sources, data validation, staff training, and protocols for data entry should form a routine part of NHS practice.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (22.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chisholm J. The Read clinical classification. BMJ. 1990 Apr 28;300(6732):1092–1092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6732.1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKee M. Routine data: a resource for clinical audit? Qual Health Care. 1993 Jun;2(2):104–111. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.2.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pringle M., Hobbs R. Large computer databases in general practice. BMJ. 1991 Mar 30;302(6779):741–742. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6779.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]