Abstract
BACKGROUND: General practice is the focal point of primary care. There are national differences in the structure and organization of practice, the relationship with secondary care is being redefined, and in some countries major changes are taking place. AIM: To describe and examine differences in the service profiles of general practitioners (GPs) in European countries. METHOD: Standardized questionnaires in the national languages were sent to samples of GPs in 1993. Four areas of service provision were measured: the GP's position in the first contact with selected health problems, the involvement in minor surgery and the application of medical procedures, disease management and preventive care. The importance of the gatekeeping role, remuneration system, and geographical region in Europe was examined by comparing scores in appropriate national groupings. RESULTS: Data were received from 7233 GPs in 30 countries. Most national samples were random and the average response rate was 47%. In countries where GPs have a gatekeeping role, they had a relatively stronger position as doctors of first contact. In those countries where GPs were usually self-employed, they had a stronger role in disease management and screening for blood cholesterol. In the examination of the three structural elements of health care, the most striking differences were evident in the comparison between eastern and western Europe. GPs throughout Europe had a comparatively small role in organized health education. CONCLUSION: The position of GPs is weak in eastern Europe and some Mediterranean countries, where service profiles have a limited range. General practice was more comprehensive where the doctors had a gatekeeping role.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (53.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Evans P. R. The changing scene in general practice in Europe. BMJ. 1994 Mar 5;308(6929):645–648. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6929.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol R., de Maeseneer J., Whitfield M., Mokkink H. Disease-centred versus patient-centred attitudes: comparison of general practitioners in Belgium, Britain and The Netherlands. Fam Pract. 1990 Jun;7(2):100–103. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.2.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKee M. Health services in central and eastern Europe: past problems and future prospects. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Dec;45(4):260–265. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.4.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McPherson K., Wennberg J. E., Hovind O. B., Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mechanic D. General medical practice: some comparisons between the work of primary care physicians in the United States and England and Wales. Med Care. 1972 Sep-Oct;10(5):402–420. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197209000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandier S. Health services utilization and physician income trends. Health Care Financ Rev. 1989 Dec;Spec No:33–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starfield B. Is primary care essential? Lancet. 1994 Oct 22;344(8930):1129–1133. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90634-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vayda E. A comparison of surgical rates in Canada and in England and Wales. N Engl J Med. 1973 Dec 6;289(23):1224–1229. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197312062892305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]