Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1997 Sep;47(422):558–561.

Specialist outreach clinics in general practice: what do they offer?

M Black 1, B Leese 1, T Gosden 1, N Mead 1
PMCID: PMC1313104  PMID: 9406489

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Specialist outreach clinics in general practice, in which hospital-based specialists hold outpatient clinics in general practitioners' (GPs) surgeries, are one example of a shift in services from secondary to primary care. AIM: To describe specialist outreach clinics held in fundholding general practices in two specialties from the perspective of patients, GPs, and consultants, and to estimate the comparative costs of these outreach clinics and equivalent hospital outpatient clinics. METHOD: Data were collected from single outreach sessions in fundholding practices and single outpatient clinics held by three dermatologists and three orthopaedic surgeons. Patients attending the outreach and outpatient clinics, GPs from practices in which the outreach clinics were held, and the consultants all completed questionnaires. Managers in general practice and hospital finance departments supplied data for the estimation of costs. RESULTS: Initial patient questionnaires were completed by 83 (86%) outreach patients and 81 (75%) outpatients. The specialist outreach clinics sampled provided few opportunities for increased interaction between specialists and GPs. Specialists were concerned about the travelling time resulting from their involvement in outreach clinics. Waiting times for first appointments were shorter in some outreach clinics than in outpatient clinics. However, patients were less concerned about the location of their consultation with the specialist than they were about the interpersonal aspects of the consultation. There was some evidence of a difference in casemix between the dermatology patients seen at outreach and those seen at outpatient clinics, which confounded the comparison of total costs associated with the two types of clinic. However, when treatment and overhead costs were excluded, the marginal cost per patient was greater in outreach clinics than in hospital clinics for both specialties studied. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that a cautious approach should be taken to further development of outreach clinics in the two specialties studied because the benefits of outreach clinics to patients, GPs and consultants may be modest, and their higher cost means that they are unlikely to be cost-effective.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (44.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailey J. J., Black M. E., Wilkin D. Specialist outreach clinics in general practice. BMJ. 1994 Apr 23;308(6936):1083–1086. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6936.1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowling A., Stramer K., Dickinson E., Windsor J., Bond M. Evaluation of specialists' outreach clinics in general practice in England: process and acceptability to patients, specialists, and general practitioners. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Feb;51(1):52–61. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coulter A. Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care. BMJ. 1995 Dec 2;311(7018):1447–1448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dixon J., Glennerster H. What do we known about fundholding in general practice? BMJ. 1995 Sep 16;311(7007):727–730. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7007.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Finlay A. Y., Khan G. K. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994 May;19(3):210–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gillam S. J., Ball M., Prasad M., Dunne H., Cohen S., Vafidis G. Investigation of benefits and costs of an ophthalmic outreach clinic in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):649–652. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935–939. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Helliwell P. S. Comparison of a community clinic with a hospital out-patient clinic in rheumatology. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35(4):385–388. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.4.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Spencer N. J. Consultant paediatric outreach clinics--a practical step in integration. Arch Dis Child. 1993 Apr;68(4):496–500. doi: 10.1136/adc.68.4.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tod E. D. Should consultants do sessions in GP fundholders' practices? A GP's view. Br J Hosp Med. 1993 Dec 15;50(11):636–637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tyrer P. Psychiatric clinics in general practice. An extension of community care. Br J Psychiatry. 1984 Jul;145:9–14. doi: 10.1192/bjp.145.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zegleman F. E. Psychiatric clinics in different settings--default rates. Health Bull (Edinb) 1988 Sep;46(5):286–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES