Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2026 Apr 27;14:e21175. doi: 10.7717/peerj.21175

Comprehensive genome characterization and expression analysis of the DUF4228 gene family in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under salt stress conditions

Esra Alther 1,2, Awadalla Abdalla Abdelmula 1, Hind Abdelmonim Elsanosi 1,2, Salma Mostafa 3,4, Guisheng Zhou 2,✉
Editor: Diaa Abd El-Moneim
PMCID: PMC13131349  PMID: 42079717

Abstract

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is recognized for its resilience to environmental adversities; the DUF4228 gene family plays vital roles in development, growth, and response to stress in number of plant species such as Arabidopsis thaliana, and Glycine max, however, the systematic analysis of these gene families lacks reports in Sorghum. In this study, we identified and characterized members of the DUF4228 gene family in the Sorghum genome through comprehensive bioinformatics analyses. A total of 25 SbDUF4228 genes were discovered and mapped across eight chromosomes. Phylogenetic analysis divided these genes into six different groupings. Subcellular localization indicated that SbDUF4228 proteins are distributed across the nucleus, mitochondria, cytoplasm, and plasma membrane, indicating potential functional diversity. Expression analysis based on Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM) values revealed that SbDUF4228 genes are differentially expressed across distinct tissues. Furthermore, the promoter regions of the DUF4228 gene were enriched with cis-regulatory elements associated with stress responses (MYB, MYC) and hormone signaling (ABA, MeJA). To further examine their role in abiotic stress response, we preformed quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) on seven SbDUF4228 genes under salt stress conditions. The results indicated SbDUF4228-4, SbDUF4228-14, SbDUF4228-1, and SbDUF4228-15 genes were significantly up-regulated following salt treatment, indicating their crucial role in salt stress tolerance. Overall, this study identifies key stress-responsive members of the SbDUF4228 family and provides a foundation for future functional research and Sorghum improvement strategies.

Keywords: Sorghum, Domains of unknown function (DUFs), Salinity stress, Expression analysis, Salt stress, Expression analysis

Introduction

Environmental disturbances are responsible for approximately 70% of annual crop yield losses (Shi, Wang & Liu, 2021), with abiotic stresses such as salinity being major contributors that disrupt plant growth and development (Mahalingam & Fedoroff, 2003; Sade et al., 2018). Although plants lack specialized sensory organs for directly perceiving environmental changes, they exhibit adaptive responses to cope with ecological stressors (Hamant & Haswell, 2017). To mitigate cellular damage caused by stress, plants activate complex defense mechanisms at molecular and cellular levels, which are essential for preserving physiological function under adverse conditions (Kim et al., 2014). The growing availability of genomic data has facilitated the identification and characterization of gene families susceptible to stress, encompassing FKBP, MAPK, NAC, PEPC, bHLH, Aux/IAA, bZIP, TIFY, HSF, and GRAS transcription factors (Zaynab, Khan & Li, 2021). Plant genomes encode several stress associated proteins with evolutionarily conserved domains that play crucial functions in diverse biological systems during stress (Zaynab, Khan & Li, 2021).

Domain of unknown function (DUF) proteins is characterized by the presence of the DUF domain and are widely found in plants (Bateman, Coggill & Finn, 2010; Luo et al., 2024). According to the Pfam database, which includes 18,259 protein entries, about 5,645 are classified as DUF families (Zhao et al., 2021). Notable DUFs include DUF581 and DUF724 in Arabidopsis thaliana, as well as DUF1618, DUF936, DUF866, DUF810, and DUF221 in Oryza sativa. jointly termed DUF families (Su et al., 2021), account for approximately 24% (4,795 out of 19,632) of the protein families cataloged in the Pfam database (version 35.0) (Su et al., 2021). As of the 2021 update, functional roles have been identified for 1,132 DUF or UPF families, resulting in their reclassification and corresponding updates to Pfam annotations (Su et al., 2021). Members of the DUF family have emerged as important contributors to plant responses under abiotic stress conditions. For example, in rice (Oryza sativa), OsDUF810.7 classified under DUF2275 has been shown to enhance stress tolerance (Mistry et al., 2021), while other DUF containing proteins such as DUF966 (OsDSR2) and DUF1644 (SIDP361) are implicated in adaptive stress mechanisms (Luo et al., 2014). In Arabidopsis thaliana, AT3g55990, which encodes a DUF231 domain protein, acts as an inhibitor of cold adaptation by suppressing low-temperature adaptation responses (Li et al., 2016). Furthermore, RING-DUF1117 E3 ubiquitin ligases, encoded by ARTDUF1 and ARTDUF2, exhibit reduced transcriptional activity under stress conditions (Xin et al., 2007). Similarly, OsSIDP366 (DUF1644), a key regulator of salt and drought stress tolerance in rice, has been shown to confer increased resilience through modulation of regulatory pathways (Kim, Ryu & Kim, 2012). Notably, transgenic rice overexpressing OsSIDP366 demonstrated improved tolerance to both salinity and drought stress (Luo et al., 2014). Additional DUF domains have been linked to other physiological roles; for instance, DUF283 has been implicated in siRNA processing and RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM)-dependent gene silencing (Guo et al., 2016), while members of the DUF538 family possess chlorophyll hydrolytic activity, potentially influencing photosynthetic efficiency (Dlakić, 2006). The overexpression of TaSRHP, a salt-inducible gene with a DUF581 domain, is linked to improved drought and salt stress tolerance in transgenic plants (Gholizadeh, 2016), further underscoring the functional versatility of DUF domain proteins in abiotic stress adaptation. To date, a total of 6,565 protein families has been annotated as DUFs, each identified by the DUF prefix followed by a unique numerical designation (e.g., DUF1, DUF2) (Bateman, Coggill & Finn, 2010; Hou et al., 2013; Su et al., 2021). Among these, the DUF4228 family (Pfam accession: PF14009) has been extensively identified across various plant genomes (Schultz et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2020). Emerging evidence indicates that DUF4228 genes are closely associated with responses to environmental stressors. In Arabidopsis thaliana, transcriptomic analyses under drought, salinity, low temperature, and osmotic pressure revealed that AT1G10530, AT1G21010, and AT1G28190 exhibited notable differential expression, suggesting functional involvement in stress adaptation (Schultz et al., 1998). Moreover, ectopic overexpression of GmDUF4228-70 in soybean (Glycine max) significantly improved seedling tolerance to drought and salinity, as supported by physiological indicators including altered proline content, levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and superoxide (O2−) accumulation (Yang et al., 2020). Conversely, the expression of MsDUF was significantly affected by NaCl, PEG6000, abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellin (GA), which down-regulated its levels, suggesting a possible role as a negative regulator in abiotic stress responses (Leng et al., 2021). Additionally, recent findings indicate that DUF4228 family containing genes also contribute to plant resistance against fungal pathogens, further highlighting the diverse functional repertoire of this gene family (Wang et al., 2018).

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is the fifth most significant cereal crop worldwide. It originated in Africa and is widely regarded as a model C4 plant species for genetic and physiological research demonstrates high photosynthetic efficiency and superior biomass productivity, enhancing its agronomic and ecological significance in agricultural systems (Didelon et al., 2020; Enyew et al., 2022; Mullet et al., 2014; Schmutz et al., 2010). It serves as an essential staple food source, especially in arid and semi-arid developing countries where drought and salinity frequently constrain agricultural productivity (Espitia-Hernández et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2019). Compared to other major cereals, Sorghum demonstrates exceptional adaptability to a broad range of environmental conditions, enabling its cultivation in agroecological zones considered marginal for conventional agriculture (Tasie & Gebreyes, 2020). Its inherent salinity tolerance makes it an ideal system for studying plant responses to salt stress. Recent studies have revealed that flavonoid biosynthesis pathways are key contributors to salinity tolerance in Sorghum (Borrell et al., 2024). As a member of the Poaceae family, Sorghum bicolor exhibits notable resilience to multiple abiotic stressors, including salinity, heat, and drought (Huang, 2018; Ren et al., 2022). This adaptability facilitates its sustained cultivation under conditions that significantly hinder the growth and yield of other staple crops.

Among stress responsive gene families, the DUF4228 gene family has garnered increasing attention due to its involvement in abiotic stress signaling and response mechanisms. Despite the potential importance of the DUF4228 domain, a systematic genomic analysis of this gene family in Sorghum has not been conducted. This knowledge gap hinders a comprehensive understanding of its contribution to Sorghum’s stress tolerance mechanisms. To address this, we performed a genome-wide identification and characterization of the DUF4228 gene family in Sorghum, providing a foundational resource for future functional studies. The results offer new understanding of the functioning roles of DUF4228 genes and establish a foundational resource for future research aimed at elucidating the chemical processes behind stress adaptation in Sorghum. Moreover, this work offers potential genetic targets for the development of stress resilient crop varieties via molecular breeding and biotechnological methodologies.

Materials and Methods

Genome identification of the DUF4228 gene in Sorghum

To identify DUF4228 gene family (PF14009) members in Sorghum, protein sequences of DUF4228 genes from Arabidopsis were downloaded from the Phytozome database (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html, v13.1, accessed on 20 April 2025). These Arabidopsis proteins sequences DUF4228 were used as queries in a BLASTP search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 13.1, accessed on 21 April 2025) against the Sorghum bicolor BTx642 v1.1 as reference genome. In addition, DUF4228 related proteins were retrieved from the Phytozome database by keyword searching the Sorghum genome. The hidden Markov model (HMM) profile for the DUF4228 domain (PF14009) was retrieved from the Pfam database. This profile was used to query the Sorghum proteome (v3.1.1) using HMMER3.0. All resulting hits were verified for the presence of the complete DUF4228 domain using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de) and PFAM (http://pfam.xfam.org/). Collectively, the both methods (Arabidopsis DUFs and PFAM domains) identified 25 members of the DUF4228 family in the Sorghum genome.

To characterize the physicochemical properties of the identified SbDUF4228 proteins, computational analyses were conducted using the ExPASy ProtParam tool (https://www.expasy.org/resources/protparam, accessed on 25 April 2025) to determine key parameters, including amino acid content, theoretical isoelectric point (pI), and molecular weight (MW). Furthermore, subcellular localization predictions for the SbDUF4228 proteins were conducted utilizing the Plant-mPLoc service (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/, accessed on 27 April 2025), a platform specialized in predicting protein localization patterns in plant systems. These bioinformatics tools facilitated a comprehensive evaluation of the physicochemical attributes and intracellular distribution of the Sorghum DUF4228 gene family members.

Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

To facilitate phylogenetic classification and structural characterization of SbDUF4228 genes, the protein sequences of 25 putative SbDUF4228 members were retrieved from the Phytozome v13.1 genomic database (accessed on 28 April 2025). Then, a multiple alignment of sequences was executed by the MUSCLE algorithm implemented in MEGA version 11 (Tu et al., 2023). An unrooted phylogenetic tree was generated in MEGA version 11 utilizing the neighbor-joining (NJ) approach based on the p-distance model, incorporating 1,000 bootstrap replicates to assess branch support. The resultant tree was visualized and annotated utilizing the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) Platform. (https://itol.embl.de, accessed on 29 April 2025) (Tamura, Stecher & Kumar, 2021).

Analysis (Ka/Ks) of DUF4228 genes

The evolutionary divergence of paralogous SbDUF4228 gene pairs was assessed by calculating pairwise non-synonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) substitution rates. Protein sequences containing the DUF4228 domain were first retrieved from phytozome database (accessed 12 April 2025). Subsequently, the corresponding coding sequences were analyzed using the Ka/Ks Calculator 2.0 module within TBtools, applying the Nei-Gojobori (NG) method (accessed on 10 May 2025).

Characterization of structural features, conserved motifs, and promoter Cis-Acting elements

To evaluate structural diversity and functional motifs within the SbDUF4228 gene family, intron–exon structures and un-translated regions (UTRs) were analyzed using TBtools. Concurrently, Conserved protein motifs have been identified using MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, v5.3.3, accessed on 14 April 2025) (Zhou et al., 2023). The XML file containing motif pattern information, generated by MEME, was imported into TBtools to visualize the distribution of conserved motifs within the SbDUF4228 proteins (Bailey & Elkan, 1994).

The 1,500 bp upstream genomic DNA sequences of SbDUF4228 proteins were obtained from Phytozome v13.1. Subsequently analyzed using the PlantCARE database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 24 April 2025) to examine putative stress responsive and hormone related cis-regulatory elements in the promoter regions.

Chromosomal mapping, duplication analysis, and synteny assessment

To determine the genomic distribution of SbDUF4228 genes, their chromosomal locations were extracted from the Sorghum genome annotation file (GFF). Furthermore, duplication events of the Sorghum SbDUF4228 gene were examined using TBtools software, and illustrated with Circos to depict the distribution and structure of SbDUF4228 gene family members within the Sorghum genome (Chen et al., 2020a), with default parameters (E-value ≤ 1e−10, minimum of five gene pairs per syntenic block). Duplicate gene pairs were classified as whole-genome/segmental, tandem, proximal, or dispersed duplicates based on their genomic coordinates and collinearity. In addition, spatial visualization of their chromosomal localization was generated using TBtool. The Synteny evaluated was conducted utilizing the Multi Synteny Plot function in TBtools to construct comparative syntenic maps between Sorghum bicolor and two other species, Arabidopsis thaliana and Glycine max.

Expression patterns of SbDUF4228 proteins in sorghum tissues

The gene expression profiles of SbDUF4228 genes were examined utilizing FPKM values obtained from the Phytozome database (accessed on 8 May 2025). The dataset encompassed five distinct Sorghum tissues: internode flag leaf, leaf boot stage, meristem at flag leaf, flowers, and seed boot stage. Gene expression visualization and clustering were performed using the heat map function in TBtools.

Cultivation of plants and collection of tissue samples

The Sorghum cultivar (JinZa) was utilized for gene expression profiling. Seeds underwent surface sterilization and were germinated in Petri dishes, uniform seedlings were subsequently transferred to a hydroponic culture system supplemented with Hoagland nutrient solution (Hoagland & Arnon, 2018), which was refreshed every two days to ensure consistent nutrient provision. Both the seedling germination and the subsequent 72-hour salt treatment were conducted under controlled settings of 24 °C, 60% relative humidity, and a 16-hour light /8-hour dark photoperiod. Salt stress treatment (2 × Hoagland nutrient solution containing 200 mM NaCl) was initiated at the three-leaf developmental stage. Leaf samples were collected at 0 (control), 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72- hours post-treatment. Following each treatment, the leaves of nine plants from three separate biological replicates were harvested promptly flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for future molecular analysis.

RNA isolation and RT- PCR analysis

RNA was isolated from leaf tissue utilizing RNA Pure Plant Kit (DNase I) (Ca. # CW0559S, CWBIO, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China), following the manufacturer’s protocol to ensure genomic DNA removal. The quality of the RNA samples was assessed for degradation or contamination by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Additionally, the purity (A260/A280 ratio) and concentration of the RNA samples were determined using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (V3.7.9). First-strand cDNA was generated from 1 µg of raw RNA utilizing the HiScriptIII RT SuperMix for qPCR (Cat. # R323-01, Vazyme, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). Following the manufacturer’s instructions, reverse transcription reactions are performed at 50 °C for 15 min followed by 85 °C for 5 s. RT-qPCR primers were created based on the coding sequences of target genes via the Integrated DNA Technology site (https://sg.idtdna.com/pages/tools) and created by Qingke Biotechnology. The SbActin gene functioned as the internal reference for normalization (Table S1). Qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed in triplicate using a CFX96 Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, USA). Each 10 µl reaction contained 5 µl of 2x ChamQ SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China; Catalog # Q711), 1 µl of a 10 µM primer mix, 1 µl of cDNA, and 3 µl of RNase-free water. The thermal cycling protocol commenced with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s and annealing/extension at 60 °C for 30 s. A melting curve analysis was conducted immediately after amplification, with the temperature ramped from 65 °C to 95 °C at an increment rate of 0.5 °C/s.

Data analysis

We used the Bio-Rad CFX Maestro software (version 4.1) to obtain the raw quantification cycle (Cq) values for each reaction Table S2. The relative expression levels of the target genes were quantified using the 2−ΔΔCT method, with SbActin serving as the internal reference control. Statistical significance of expression differences was determined using a paired t-test (p < 0.05) on data from three independent biological replicates. Further details regarding the qPCR procedure are provided in the MIQE checklist (Table S3).

Results

Comprehensive characterization of SbDUF4228s

Through a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis, a total of 25 DUF4228 genes were discovered in the Sorghum bicolor BTx642 v1.1 genome and assigned those unique names (SbDUF4228-1 to SbDUF4228-25) based on their chromosomal locations and relative linear arrangement, these genes were distributed unevenly across the chromosomes of Sorghum, along with all chromosomes contain 2–5 genes, except chromosome 5 contained only a single member, SbDUF4228-1 (Fig. 1). The corresponding proteins exhibited substantial variation in sequence length, ranging from 112 to 294 amino acids. Their estimated molecular weights spanned from 11.2 to 29.4 kDa, while their theoretical isoelectric points (pI) varied between 4.88 and 11.22, indicating substantial diversity in physicochemical properties. Subcellular localization predictions revealed that SbDUF4228 proteins are distributed across various cellular compartments. Specifically, 12 proteins were predicted to localize predominantly in the nucleus, whereas four proteins were associated with both the plasma membrane and chloroplast. An additional four proteins were exclusively targeted to the chloroplast, and one protein was predicted to localize to the mitochondria. Interestingly, two proteins exhibited multi-compartment localization: one was detected in both the mitochondria and chloroplast, and another showed distribution across the mitochondria, cytoplasm, and chloroplast. These distinct localization patterns suggest functional divergence and specialization among SbDUF4228 family members, potentially reflecting their involvement in different aspects of abiotic stress response and cellular regulation. Each SbDUF4228 protein was showed (Table S4).

Figure 1. The chromosome numbers and names of the SbDUF4228 genes, the scale on the left, in black, represent the length of each sorghum chromosome.

Figure 1

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of SbDUF4228 gene family members

To investigate conserved features within the DUF4228 protein family, a multiple sequence alignment of representative homologs was performed using the MUSCLE algorithm, as implemented in MEGA version 11. The alignment identified several highly conserved regions across the sequences (Fig. S1). Specifically, cysteine and glycine residues were consistently preserved in the regions spanning positions 70–80 and 190–210, suggesting the presence of critical structural or functional motifs. Notably, conserved blocks were concentrated in the central and C-terminal regions (approximately residues 150–240 and 320–340), indicating that these domains may form the functional core of the DUF4228 family. In contrast, the N-terminal region exhibited considerable sequence variability, which could reflect differences in regulatory interactions or subcellular localization among homologs. The recurrent conservation of cysteine residues across the alignment suggests a potential role in disulfide bond formation or metal ion binding, both of which could contribute to the structural stability of the protein. These conserved patterns highlight key residues that may be critical for structural stability or biochemical function, warranting further investigation through structural modeling.

The phylogenetic relationships between SbDUF4228 and DUF4228 homologs across plant species were examined using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method, utilizing full length protein sequences. All SbDUF4228 members were grouped into six distinct clusters, as showed in Fig. 2, with classification guided by branch lengths and tree topology. Intriguingly, a linear relationship was observed between groups and DUF4228 member abundance in Sorghum and its ancestral species (Fig. 2). This pattern implies that genomic duplication events may have driven the expansion and diversification of the SbDUF4228 gene family.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of DUF4228 proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana and Sorghum bicolor was constructed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method.

Figure 2

Distinct protein groups (A, B, C, D, E, and F) are highlighted by colored arcs.

Gene structure and conserved elements of SbDUF4228 family members

Conserved motifs within the SbDUF4228 protein family were predicted using the MEME online platform, revealing ten conserved motifs (Fig. 3B). Motifs 2, 4, and 6 were present in most family members, with Motif 1 present across all family members. In contrast, motifs 4–10 displayed a differential distribution exclusively presented in specific clusters. For example, Motif 3 was uniquely identified in Cluster 6, while Motif 9 was exclusive to Cluster 2, indicative of putative functional divergence among phylogenetic groups. Furthermore, exon-intron structural analysis, a key determinant of gene architecture and evolutionary dynamic, was conducted to elucidate diversification patterns within the gene family. Genomic annotation analysis of Sorghum using published GTF data revealed that SbDUF4228 genes contain between 1 and 2 exons and up to 2 introns (Fig. 3C). While most genes feature both 3′- and 5′-UTRs, minorities retain UTRs at only one terminus or lack them entirely. Furthermore, genes within the same phylogenetic cluster exhibit conserved exon-intron architectures, implying that paralogs with shared conserved domains adopt analogous structural configurations (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3. (A) Phylogenetic relationships, (B) conserved motif compositions, and (C) gene structures of SbDUF4228 genes, distinct conserved motifs are illustrated as colored boxes.

Figure 3

Green boxes denote untranslated regions (UTRs), while yellow boxes represent exons.

Homologous gene analysis of SbDUF4228 genes and Ka/Ks analysis

Homologous genes (HGs), defined as genes sharing structural and functional similarities due to common evolutionary ancestry, underscore the critical role of gene duplication in shaping functional divergence. Tandem duplication events were identified among 25 SbDUF4228 paralogs (Fig. 4), suggesting that tandem duplication has substantially facilitated the proliferation of this gene family. To explore evolutionary conservation, a collinearity analysis was conducted to compare DUF4228 homologs across different plant species. This analysis revealed syntenic relationships and lineage-specific duplication patterns between Sorghum bicolor, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Glycine max (Fig. 5). To evaluate the evolutionary selection pressures acting on the SbDUF4228 gene family, the proportion of nonsynonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) substitution rates (Ka/Ks) was computed, an established metric for evaluating selective constraints on homologous genes. A Ka/Ks ratio below 1 reflects purifying selection, wherein deleterious mutations are eliminated to preserve gene function. A ratio equal to 1 reflects neutral evolution, suggesting the absence of selective pressure, while a ratio exceeding 1 implies positive selection, potentially associated with adaptive evolution. The analysis revealed that all SbDUF4228 paralogous gene pairs displayed Ka/Ks ratios less than 1, signifying purifying selection, which may reflect functional conservation or specialization within the gene family (Table S5).

Figure 4. Homozygosity analysis of the sorghum SbDUF4228 family.

Figure 4

The different colors curve connecting the SbDUF4228 genes indicates duplicate gene pairs in the sorghum SbDUF4228 family.

Figure 5. Synteny analysis of DUF4228 genes among Sorghum bicolor, Glycine max, and Arabidopsis thaliana, gray lines in the background represent collinear blocks between S. bicolor and the other plant genomes, while blue lines highlight syntenic DUF4228 gene pairs.

Figure 5

Prediction of Cis-acting elements in DUF4228 genes

To identify potential cis-acting elements of the SbDUF4228 gene family we investigated the 1.5-kb upstream promoter regions using the PlantCARE database. Our analysis identified a total of 90 cis-regulatory elements, categorized into five functional groups: core promoter element regions (e.g., TATA-box and CAAT-box), phytohormone-responsive elements (e.g., abscisic acid, auxin, and gibberellin-related motifs), environment-responsive elements (e.g., light, drought, and stress-related motifs), transcription factor-binding motifs, and tissue-specific regulatory elements (Table S6). These findings suggest that SbDUF4228 genes may be regulated by a variety of developmental, hormonal, and environmental factors.

The promoter regions of SbDUF4228 genes exhibited a diverse array of cis-acting elements, indicating their potential involvement in multiple biological processes in Sorghum. Furthermore, stress-responsive motifs, such as MYC, MYB, Stress Response Element (STRE), and W-box (which are binding sites for WRKY transcription factors), were found to be highly enriched. To investigate the potential function of SbDUF4228 genes in adaptation to salt stress, we focused on 11 cis-regulatory elements linked to environmental stress or stress-related phytohormonal signaling. These elements were consistently present across all SbDUF4228 promoters (Fig. 6).

Figure 6. Analysis of cis-regulatory elements in SbDUF4228 gene promoters Cis-acting regulatory elements were predicted within the 1,500 bp upstream promoter regions of SbDUF4228 genes using the PlantCARE database.

Figure 6

Distinct colors indicate elements grouped by functional categories, allowing for easy visual identification of motifs related to various biological processes.

Tissue-specific expression profiling of SbDUF4228 genes

To examine the expression profiles of SbDUF4228 genes, expression data (FPKM values) were obtained from the Phytozome database. The analysis included five distinct Sorghum tissues: internode flag leaf, leaf boot stage, meristem at flag leaf, flowers, and seed boot stage (Fig. 7 and Table S7). The majority of SbDUF4228 genes were expressed in at least one tissue. However, certain genes, such as SbDUF4228-10, SbDUF4228-21, SbDUF4228-22, SbDUF4228-24, and SbDUF4228-17, exhibited minimal or no expression across all tissues examined. In contrast, genes including SbDUF4228-1, SbDUF4228-2, SbDUF4228-3, SbDUF4228-9, SbDUF4228-14, SbDUF4228-15, SbDUF4228-16, SbDUF4228-18, and SbDUF4228-20 demonstrated widespread expression across all tissues. Furthermore, SbDUF4228-4 exhibited high expression levels in all tissues analyzed, while SbDUF4228-12 was up-regulated in seed boot stage, as showed in Fig. 7. These results highlight the differential expression of SbDUF4228 genes in diverse tissues, suggesting functional diversification and tissue specific regulatory roles.

Figure 7. Analysis of expression patterns of SbDUF4228 genes across five Sorghum bicolor tissues.

Figure 7

The expression profiles based on FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads) values. The color scale bars on the right indicate the expression levels of each gene, with the expression levels arranged horizontally.

Evaluation of SbDUF4228 gene expression in response to salt stress

To investigate the potential role of DUF4228-domain in the salt stress response, we analyzed the expression of seven selected SbDUF4228 genes via qRT-PCR (Figs. 8 and 9). Exposure to high salinity (200 mM NaCl) elicited distinct differential expression patterns among the selected genes, three genes exhibited altered expression. Specifically, SbDUF4228-1, SbDUF4228-4, and SbDUF4228-14 were significantly up-regulated at the 6-hour time point compared to the control (0 h), suggesting their involvement in the early stress response. The expression of SbDUF4228-15 significantly up-regulated at 12 h (Figs. 8 and 9). In contrast, SbDUF4228-17, SbDUF4228-22, and SbDUF4228-25 were significantly down-regulated throughout the stress period, suggesting that their suppression may be necessary for physiological adaptation to salinity.

Figure 8. Expression profiles of seven SbDUF4228 genes under 200 mM NaCl level, at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after treatments measured by qRT-PCR, Expression was normalized to SbPP2A.

Figure 8

(Actin). Error bars show Standard Deviation; asterisks indicate significant differences vs. 0 h by t-test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).

Figure 9. Heatmap visualization was performed using log-transformed mean expression values derived from three independent qRT-PCR replicates.

Figure 9

The color gradient represents the relative signal intensity of each gene across treatments.

Discussion

The Domain of Unknown Function (DUF) protein families comprise a group of proteins whose functions remain largely uncharacterized but are increasingly recognized for their potential roles in the development of plants and reactions to abiotic stress. The DUF4228 gene family, recently identified in higher plants, has attracted attention due to its potential involvement in plant growth, development, and abiotic stress resilience (Zheng, Dang & Sui, 2023).

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) a cereal crop native to Africa, ranks as the fifth most important grain crop worldwide. It is widely recognized for its exceptional tolerance various abiotic stresses, including drought, floods, salt stress, soil degradation, and high temperatures (Bakari et al., 2023).

To date, a genome-wide identification and characterization of the DUF4228 gene family in Sorghum has not been reported. Therefore, in this research, we conducted a systematic comprehensive genome characterization of the DUF4228 gene family in Sorghum using bioinformatics approaches. 25 SbDUF4228 genes were recognized from the Sorghum reference genome. Comparative analysis revealed the presence of 25 DUF4228 genes in Arabidopsis thaliana, 81 in Glycine max, and 308 DUF4228 genes in four species of Gossypium, indicating significant variation in gene family size across species (Leng et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2020; Zheng, Dang & Sui, 2023). Phylogenetic analysis, involving S. bicolor, A. thaliana, and G. max, allowed for the classification of these genes into distinct evolutionary groups, providing insights into their potential functional divergence.

The variety in motifs and their numbers in the SbDUF4228 gene family may contribute to the functional diversity of these genes. The present of motif 1 in all DUF4228 proteins, suggesting it is crucial for the identification of the Sorghum DUF4228 genes. Analysis of gene structure revealed that SbDUF4228 genes contain between one and two exons and up to two introns. This exon/intron structure differs from that observed in Glycine max, where GmDUF4228-70 was found to contain seven introns (Yang et al., 2020).

Homologous genes (HGs) characterized by analogous structures and biological functions across various species or within the same species due to a shared evolutionary ancestry, are crucial in elucidating gene function. To explore the homology of the SbDUF4228 genes with dicotyledonous plants (G. max and A. thaliana) we performed covariance analyzed, our results revealed that SbDUF4228 genes share four homologous pairs with Arabidopsis thaliana and twenty homologous pairs with Glycine max. This substantial numerical disparity indicates a significant expansion of the DUF4228 family in the soybean genome relative to that of Arabidopsis.

Gene duplication, in particular, is a key factor in shaping gene function. In this study, synteny analysis between the Sorghum genome and two other plant genomes revealed that all DUF4228 duplicated genes have experienced purifying selection throughout the duplication process; this indicates that the role of these duplicated DUF4228 genes has likely remained conserved through subsequent evolutionary events. These findings align with previous studies, such as those on potato (Solanum tuberosum) StDUF4228 genes, where gene duplication also exhibited both positive and purifying selection pressures (Zaynab, Khan & Li, 2021).

Cis-acting components within promoter regions of genes play a crucial role in the transcriptional regulation of gene expression by interacting with transcription factors. These elements are involved in regulating gene expression during various physiological mechanisms, such as growth, development, and responses to environmental stress. Research indicates that members of the DUF4228 gene family are crucial for plant growth, development, and stress responses (Zheng, Dang & Sui, 2023). In this study, we examined the cis-acting elements within the 1,500-bp upstream promoter region of Sorghum bicolor DUF4228 genes. Our analysis revealed 90 cis-acting elements can be classified into five functional groups, such as light response, biotic/abiotic stress, growth and development, particular region, and plant hormone response. This indicates that the SbDUF4228 genes likely play a significant role in plant growth, stress responses, and development. A similar finding was reported in Gossypium DUF4228 genes, where cis-acting elements related to growth and development, specific regions, and plant hormone responses accounted for the most substantial proportion of the identified elements (Leng et al., 2021). Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and abscisic acid (ABA) are essential phytohormones that significantly influence several signaling pathways, governing both physiological and molecular processes in plants. These hormones are pivotal to plant defense systems against biotic challenges and also aid in alleviating abiotic conditions, including drought, salinity, vernalization, and heavy metal exposure (Chen et al., 2020b; Rehman et al., 2023). In this research, we identified a significant presence of cis-acting elements associated with methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and abscisic acid (ABA) in the promoter regions of the SbDUF4228 gene family. This result is consistent with previous analyses of the Gossypium GhDUF4228 promoter (Lv et al., 2022). Furthermore, additional elements identified in the SbDUF4228 gene promoters are linked to abiotic stress responses; this result aligns with the findings of prior investigations into responses to dehydration, salt stress, and ABA signaling (Wang et al., 2019).

Numerous studies have demonstrated that members of the DUF family are linked to plant stress resistance (Yang et al., 2020; Zheng, Dang & Sui, 2023). The overexpression of the GmDUF4228-70 gene enhanced the expression of marker genes in response to both drought and salt stressors (Yang et al., 2020). In Gossypium, the GhDUF4228-67 gene has been shown to be a positive regulator of cotton reaction to salt stress (Lv et al., 2022). Addition, in A. thaliana, the ATDUF4228 genes may be implicated in the processes of plant tolerance to abiotic stressors (Yang et al., 2020). To further investigate the response of the SbDUF4228 gene family to salt stress, qRT-PCR an analysis was performed on seven selected SbDUF4228 genes. The results showed that under high salinity conditions (200 mM NaCl), most of the selected SbDUF4228 genes were initially up-regulated, and followed by a gradual decrease in expression, suggesting their potential role in the early response to salt stress. Notably, SbDUF4228-1, SbDUF4228-4, SbDUF4228-14, and SbDUF4228-15 exhibited significant up-regulation, with the greatest decline observed at 48 h. The expression of SbDUF4228-15 showed an up-regulation and significantly higher than that of 0 h (control) at 12 h. In contrast, SbDUF4228-17, SbDUF4228-22, and SbDUF4228-25 were significantly down-regulated compared to the control (0 h). These results suggest that the SbDUF4228 gene family exhibits distinct, temporal, and stress specific expression patterns in response to salinity. The identification of DUF4228 genes in the Sorghum bicolor genome, with their differential responses to salt stress, underscores the potential role of this gene family in salinity adaptation. Collectively, these findings provide valuable insights into the functional significance of SbDUF4228 genes and may inform strategies for developing Sorghum varieties with enhanced tolerance to salinity.

Conclusions

DUF4228 proteins are crucial for plant responses to abiotic stress. In this study, a total of 25 SbDUF4228 genes in S. bicolor were found via bioinformatics research and classified into six categories (Group A, B, C, D, E, and Group F). Predictions of subcellular localization revealed that these genes are primarily situated in the nucleus, plasma membrane, chloroplast, mitochondria, and cytoplasm. The examination of gene architecture, chromosomal localization, and phylogenetic connections demonstrated that the SbDUF4228 gene family is significantly preserved across the evolutionary history of Sorghum. Promoter analysis revealed many cis-acting factors linked to growth, development, environmental stress responses, and control of hormones. Gene expression pattern analysis suggested that the SbDUF4228 gene family plays a regulatory role in the growth and development of Sorghum. qRT-PCR further validated that the expression of SbDUF4228 genes is both temporally dependent and specific to salt stress. The expression profiles of SbDUF4228 genes indicated that SbDUF4228-1, SbDUF4228-4, SbDUF4228-14, and SbDUF4228-15 are particularly important in reaction to salinity stress, suggesting their potential role in Sorghum adaptation to environmental stresses.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Description of primers utilized for the Real time PCR.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Raw data.
peerj-14-21175-s002.xlsx (17.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Checklist.
peerj-14-21175-s003.xlsx (12.3KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. Physicochemical properties and subcellular localization of predicted Sorghum bicolor DUF4228 proteins.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-4
Supplemental Information 5. Ka/Ks Analysis in DUF4228 Protein.
peerj-14-21175-s005.xlsx (8.8KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-5
Supplemental Information 6. Details of the cis-elements identified in DUF4228 gene family.
peerj-14-21175-s006.xlsx (18.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-6
Supplemental Information 7. The SbDUF4228 gene expression profile in variant tissue of sorghum.
peerj-14-21175-s007.xlsx (11.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-7
Supplemental Information 8. Protein sequence alignment of the 25 SbDUF4228 homologs in sorghum.
peerj-14-21175-s008.docx (207.8KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-8

Abbreviations

DUF

Domain of unknown function

HMM

Hidden Markov model

SbDUF4228

Sorghum bicolor DUF4228

AtDUF4228

Arabidopsis thaliana DUF4228

pI

Isoelectric point

MeJA

Methyl Jasmonate

ABA

Abscisic acid

FPKM

Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads

qRT-PCR

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the China National Key research and development (R&D) Project (2022 YFE0113400). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Esra Alther conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Awadalla Abdalla Abdelmula analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, helpful discussions, and approved the final draft.

Hind Abdelmonim Elsanosi performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, helpful assistance and discussion, and approved the final draft.

Salma Mostafa performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Guisheng Zhou conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is available in the Supplemental Files.

References

  • Bailey & Elkan (1994).Bailey TL, Elkan C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. 1994;2:28–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bakari et al. (2023).Bakari H, Djomdi, Ruben ZF, Roger DD, Cedric D, Guillaume P, Pascal D, Philippe M, Gwendoline C. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and its main parts (by-products) as promising sustainable sources of value-added ingredients. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2023;14:1023–1044. doi: 10.1007/s12649-022-01992-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bateman, Coggill & Finn (2010).Bateman A, Coggill P, Finn RD. DUFs: families in search of function. Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications. 2010;66:1148–1152. doi: 10.1107/S1744309110001685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Borrell et al. (2024).Borrell A, Jordan D, Mullet J, Henzell B, Hammer G. Drought adaptation in cereals. CRC Press; 2024. Drought adaptation in sorghum; pp. 335–399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2020a).Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, Xia R. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Molecular Plant. 2020a;13:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2020b).Chen K, Li GJ, Bressan RA, Song CP, Zhu JK, Zhao Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2020b;62:25–54. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Didelon et al. (2020).Didelon M, Khafif M, Godiard L, Barbacci A, Raffaele S. Patterns of sequence and expression diversification associate members of the PADRE gene family with response to fungal pathogens. Frontiers in Genetics. 2020;11:491. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dlakić (2006).Dlakić M. DUF283 domain of Dicer proteins has a double-stranded RNA-binding fold. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2711–2714. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Enyew et al. (2022).Enyew M, Feyissa T, Carlsson AS, Tesfaye K, Hammenhag C, Geleta M. Genetic diversity and population structure of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench) accessions as revealed by single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;12:799482. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.799482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Espitia-Hernández et al. (2022).Espitia-Hernández P, Chavez Gonzalez ML, Ascacio-Valdés JA, Dávila-Medina D, Flores-Naveda A, Silva T, Ruelas Chacon X, Sepúlveda L. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) as a potential source of bioactive substances and their biological properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2022;62:2269–2280. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1852389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gholizadeh (2016).Gholizadeh A. DUF538 protein superfamily is predicted to be chlorophyll hydrolyzing enzymes in plants. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2016;22:77–85. doi: 10.1007/s12298-015-0331-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guo et al. (2016).Guo C, Luo C, Guo L, Li M, Guo X, Zhang Y, Wang L, Chen L. OsSIDP366, a DUF1644 gene, positively regulates responses to drought and salt stresses in rice. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2016;58:492–502. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hamant & Haswell (2017).Hamant O, Haswell ES. Life behind the wall: sensing mechanical cues in plants. BMC Biology. 2017;15:59. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0403-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoagland & Arnon (2018).Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • Hou et al. (2013).Hou X, Liang Y, He X, Shen Y, Huang Z. A novel ABA-responsive TaSRHP gene from wheat contributes to enhanced resistance to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2013;31:791–801. doi: 10.1007/s11105-012-0549-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Huang (2018).Huang R-D. Research progress on plant tolerance to soil salinity and alkalinity in sorghum. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2018;17:739–746. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61728-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim, Ryu & Kim (2012).Kim SJ, Ryu MY, Kim WT. Suppression of Arabidopsis RING-DUF1117 E3 ubiquitin ligases, AtRDUF1 and AtRDUF2, reduces tolerance to ABA-mediated drought stress. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2012;420:141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.02.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim et al. (2014).Kim Y, Tsuda K, Igarashi D, Hillmer RA, Sakakibara H, Myers CL, Katagiri F. Mechanisms underlying robustness and tunability in a plant immune signaling network. Cell Host & Microbe. 2014;15:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leng et al. (2021).Leng Z-X, Liu Y, Chen Z-Y, Guo J, Chen J, Zhou Y-B, Chen M, Ma Y-Z, Xu Z-S, Cui X-Y. Genome-wide analysis of the DUF4228 family in soybean and functional identification of GmDUF4228–70 in response to drought and salt stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:628299. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.628299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2016).Li M, Guo L, Guo C, Wang L, Chen L. Over-expression of a DUF1644 protein gene, SIDP361, enhances tolerance to salt stress in transgenic rice. Journal of Plant Biology. 2016;59:62–73. doi: 10.1007/s12374-016-0180-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Luo et al. (2024).Luo C, Akhtar M, Min W, Bai X, Ma T, Liu C. Domain of unknown function (DUF) proteins in plants: function and perspective. Protoplasma. 2024;261:397–410. doi: 10.1007/s00709-023-01917-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Luo et al. (2014).Luo C, Guo C, Wang W, Wang L, Chen L. Overexpression of a new stress-repressive gene OsDSR2 encoding a protein with a DUF966 domain increases salt and simulated drought stress sensitivities and reduces ABA sensitivity in rice. Plant Cell Reports. 2014;33:323–336. doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1532-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lv et al. (2022).Lv X, Wei F, Lian B, Yin G, Sun M, Chen P, An L, Jian H, Wang H, Fu X, Ma L, Lu J, Wang B, Wei H. A comprehensive analysis of the DUF4228 gene family in gossypium reveals the role of GhDUF4228-67 in salt tolerance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23:13542. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mahalingam & Fedoroff (2003).Mahalingam R, Fedoroff NV. Stress response, cell death and signalling: the many faces of reactive oxygen species. Physiologia Plantarum. 2003;119:56–68. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00156.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mistry et al. (2021).Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar GA, Sonnhammer EL, Tosatto SC, Paladin L, Raj S, Richardson LJ. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Research. 2021;49:D412–D419. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mullet et al. (2014).Mullet J, Morishige D, McCormick R, Truong S, Hilley J, McKinley B, Anderson R, Olson SN, Rooney W. Energy Sorghum—a genetic model for the design of C4 grass bioenergy crops. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2014;65:3479–3489. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rehman et al. (2023).Rehman M, Saeed MS, Fan X, Salam A, Munir R, Yasin MU, Khan AR, Muhammad S, Ali B, Ali I, Khan J, Gan Y. The multifaceted role of jasmonic acid in plant stress mitigation: an overview. Plants. 2023;12:3982. doi: 10.3390/plants12233982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ren et al. (2022).Ren G, Yang P, Cui J, Gao Y, Yin C, Bai Y, Zhao D, Chang J. Multiomics analyses of two sorghum cultivars reveal the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:886805. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.886805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sade et al. (2018).Sade N, Del Mar Rubio-Wilhelmi M, Umnajkitikorn K, Blumwald E. Stress-induced senescence and plant tolerance to abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2018;69:845–853. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schmutz et al. (2010).Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, Hyten DL, Song Q, Thelen JJ, Cheng J, Xu D, Hellsten U, May GD, Yu Y, Sakurai T, Umezawa T, Bhattacharyya MK, Sandhu D, Valliyodan B, Lindquist E, Peto M, Grant D, Shu S, Goodstein D, Barry K, Futrell-Griggs M, Abernathy B, Du J, Tian Z, Zhu L, Gill N, Joshi T, Libault M, Sethuraman A, Zhang X-C, Shinozaki K, Nguyen HT, Wing RA, Cregan P, Specht J, Grimwood J, Rokhsar D, Stacey G, Shoemaker RC, Jackson SA. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature. 2010;463:178–183. doi: 10.1038/nature08670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schultz et al. (1998).Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P, Ponting CP. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95:5857–5864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.5857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi, Wang & Liu (2021).Shi W, Wang M, Liu Y. Crop yield and production responses to climate disasters in China. Science of the Total Environment. 2021;750:141147. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Su et al. (2021).Su D, Xiang W, Wen L, Lu W, Shi Y, Liu Y, Li Z. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of BES1 gene family in tomato. BMC Plant Biology. 2021;21:161. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-02933-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tamura, Stecher & Kumar (2021).Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2021;38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tasie & Gebreyes (2020).Tasie MM, Gebreyes BG. Characterization of nutritional, antinutritional, and mineral contents of thirty-five sorghum varieties grown in Ethiopia. International Journal of Food Science. 2020;2020:8243617. doi: 10.1155/2020/8243617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tu et al. (2023).Tu M, Du C, Yu B, Wang G, Deng Y, Wang Y, Chen M, Chang J, Yang G, He G, Xiong Z, Li Y. Current advances in the molecular regulation of abiotic stress tolerance in sorghum via transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1147328. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1147328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2019).Wang X, Guo C, Peng J, Li C, Wan F, Zhang S, Zhou Y, Yan Y, Qi L, Sun K, Yang S, Gong Z, Li J. ABRE-BINDING FACTORS play a role in the feedback regulation of ABA signaling by mediating rapid ABA induction of ABA co-receptor genes. New Phytologist. 2019;221:341–355. doi: 10.1111/nph.15345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2018).Wang Y, Zhang Z, Liu H, An Y, Han B, Wu Y, Chang L, Hu T, Yang P. Overexpression of an alfalfa (Medicago sativa) gene, MsDUF, negatively impacted seed germination and response to osmotic stress in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2018;132:525–534. doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1348-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xin et al. (2007).Xin Z, Mandaokar A, Chen J, Last RL, Browse J. Arabidopsis ESK1 encodes a novel regulator of freezing tolerance. The Plant Journal. 2007;49:786–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang et al. (2020).Yang Q, Niu X, Tian X, Zhang X, Cong J, Wang R, Zhang G, Li G. Comprehensive genomic analysis of the DUF4228 gene family in land plants and expression profiling of ATDUF4228 under abiotic stresses. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:12. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6389-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zaynab, Khan & Li (2021).Zaynab M, Khan KA, Li S. Identification and expression analysis of DUF4228 domain containing (DDP) genes in potato under abiotic and phytohormone stress. Research Square. 2021 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-902964/v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2019).Zhao Z-Y, Che P, Glassman K, Albertsen M. Sorghum: methods and protocols. Humana Press; New York: 2019. Nutritionally enhanced sorghum for the arid and semiarid tropical areas of Africa; pp. 197–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2021).Zhao J, Wang P, Gao W, Long Y, Wang Y, Geng S, Su X, Jiao Y, Chen Q, Qu Y. Genome-wide identification of the DUF668 gene family in cotton and expression profiling analysis of GhDUF668 in Gossypium hirsutum under adverse stress. BMC Genomics. 2021;22:395. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07716-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zheng, Dang & Sui (2023).Zheng H, Dang Y, Sui N. Sorghum: a multipurpose crop. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2023;71:17570–17583. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou et al. (2023).Zhou T, Xu K, Zhao F, Liu W, Li L, Hua Z, Zhou X. itol. toolkit accelerates working with iTOL (Interactive Tree of Life) by an automated generation of annotation files. Bioinformatics. 2023;39:btad339. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Description of primers utilized for the Real time PCR.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Raw data.
peerj-14-21175-s002.xlsx (17.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Checklist.
peerj-14-21175-s003.xlsx (12.3KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. Physicochemical properties and subcellular localization of predicted Sorghum bicolor DUF4228 proteins.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-4
Supplemental Information 5. Ka/Ks Analysis in DUF4228 Protein.
peerj-14-21175-s005.xlsx (8.8KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-5
Supplemental Information 6. Details of the cis-elements identified in DUF4228 gene family.
peerj-14-21175-s006.xlsx (18.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-6
Supplemental Information 7. The SbDUF4228 gene expression profile in variant tissue of sorghum.
peerj-14-21175-s007.xlsx (11.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-7
Supplemental Information 8. Protein sequence alignment of the 25 SbDUF4228 homologs in sorghum.
peerj-14-21175-s008.docx (207.8KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21175/supp-8

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is available in the Supplemental Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES