Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1998 Aug;48(433):1509–1514.

Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

F Fylan 1
PMCID: PMC1313202  PMID: 10024713

Abstract

The United Kingdom (UK) cervical screening programme has been successful in securing participation of a high proportion of targeted women, and has seen a fall in mortality rates of those suffering from cervical cancer. There remains, however, a significant proportion of unscreened women and, of women in whom an abnormality is detected, many will not attend for colposcopy. The present work reviews the psychological consequences of receiving an abnormal cervical smear result and of secondary screening and treatment, and examines reasons for women's non-participation in the screening programme. Psychological theories of screening behavior are used to elucidate women's reactions and to suggest methods of increasing participation, of improving the quality of the service, and of reducing women's anxiety. A literature search identified studies that examine factors influencing women's participation in the screening programme, their psychological reaction to the receipt of an abnormal cervical smear result, and experiences of colposcopy. Reasons for non-participation include administrative failures, unavailability of a female screener, inconvenient clinic times, lack of awareness of the test's indications and benefits, considering oneself not to be at risk of developing cervical cancer, and fear of embarrassment, pain, or the detection of cancer. The receipt of an abnormal result and referral for colposcopy cause high levels of distress owing to limited understanding of the meaning of the smear test; many women believe the test aims to detect existing cervical cancer. The quality of the cervical screening service can be enhanced by the provision of additional information, by improved quality of communication, and by consideration of women's health beliefs. This may result in increased participation in, and satisfaction with, the service.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (45.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. M. Cervical screening. Large mismatch exists between cancers and surrogate end points. BMJ. 1997 Apr 26;314(7089):1277–1277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Austoker J. Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer. BMJ. 1994 Jul 23;309(6949):241–248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6949.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsevick A. M., Johnson J. E. Preference for information and involvement, information seeking and emotional responses of women undergoing colposcopy. Res Nurs Health. 1990 Feb;13(1):1–7. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770130103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beardow R., Oerton J., Victor C. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district. BMJ. 1989 Jul 8;299(6691):98–100. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6691.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker M. H., Maiman L. A. Strategies for enhancing patient compliance. J Community Health. 1980 Winter;6(2):113–135. doi: 10.1007/BF01318980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell S., Porter M., Kitchener H., Fraser C., Fisher P., Mann E. Psychological response to cervical screening. Prev Med. 1995 Nov;24(6):610–616. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennetts A., Irwig L., Oldenburg B., Simpson J. M., Mock P., Boyes A., Adams K., Weisberg E., Shelley J. PEAPS-Q: a questionnaire to measure the psychosocial effects of having an abnormal pap smear. Psychosocial Effects of Abnormal Pap Smears Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Oct;48(10):1235–1243. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00015-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Black R. J., Bray F., Ferlay J., Parkin D. M. Cancer incidence and mortality in the European Union: cancer registry data and estimates of national incidence for 1990. Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jun;33(7):1075–1107. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00492-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonelli L., Branca M., Ferreri M., Barizzone D., Rossi E., Cedri S., Bruzzi P., Santi L. Attitude of women towards early cancer detection and estimation of the compliance to a screening program for cervix and breast cancer. Cancer Detect Prev. 1996;20(4):342–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell H., MacDonald S., McKiernan M. Promotion of cervical screening uptake by health visitor follow-up of women who repeatedly failed to attend. J Public Health Med. 1996 Mar;18(1):94–97. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cook G. A., Draper G. J. Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain. Br J Cancer. 1984 Sep;50(3):367–375. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1984.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Crombie I. K., Orbell S., Johnston G., Robertson A. J., Kenicer M. Cervical screening: the optimum visit plan for contacting users and non-users in Scotland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Dec;48(6):586–589. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.6.586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cuzick J., Boyle P. Trends in cervix cancer mortality. Cancer Surv. 1988;7(3):417–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cuzick J., Sasieni P., Singer A. Risk factors for invasive cervix cancer in young women. Eur J Cancer. 1996 May;32A(5):836–841. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00650-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cuzick J., Singer A., De Stavola B. L., Chomet J. Case-control study of risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in young women. Eur J Cancer. 1990;26(6):684–690. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(90)90117-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Davidson P. O., Schrag A. R. Factors affecting the outcome of child psychiatric consultations. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1969 Oct;39(5):774–778. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1969.tb00659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Doyle Y. A survey of the cervical screening service in a London district, including reasons for non-attendance, ethnic responses and views on the quality of the service. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(8):953–957. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90250-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Eardley A. Radiotherapy: what are patients' needs? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1985 Dec;11(4):353–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Elkind A. K., Haran D., Eardley A., Spencer B. Computer-managed cervical cytology screening: a pilot study of non-attenders. Public Health. 1987 Jul;101(4):253–266. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(87)80076-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Furber S. E., Weisberg E., Simpson J. M. Progression and regression of low-grade epithelial abnormalities of the cervix. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Feb;37(1):107–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1997.tb02230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gath D. H., Hallam N., Mynors-Wallis L., Day A., Bond S. A. Emotional reactions in women attending a UK colposcopy clinic. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Feb;49(1):79–83. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gustafsson L., Pontén J., Zack M., Adami H. O. International incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cytological screening. Cancer Causes Control. 1997 Sep;8(5):755–763. doi: 10.1023/a:1018435522475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harlan L. C., Bernstein A. B., Kessler L. G. Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why? Am J Public Health. 1991 Jul;81(7):885–890. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.7.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Herbert A. Is cervical screening working? A cytopathologist's view from the United Kingdom. Hum Pathol. 1997 Feb;28(2):120–126. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(97)90094-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones M. H., Singer A., Jenkins D. The mildly abnormal cervical smear: patient anxiety and choice of management. J R Soc Med. 1996 May;89(5):257–260. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kavanagh A. M., Broom D. H. Women's understanding of abnormal cervical smear test results: a qualitative interview study. BMJ. 1997 May 10;314(7091):1388–1391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7091.1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kernohan E. E. Evaluation of a pilot study for breast and cervical cancer screening with Bradford's minority ethnic women; a community development approach, 1991-93. Br J Cancer Suppl. 1996 Sep;29:S42–S46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kiviat N. Natural history of cervical neoplasia: overview and update. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 2):1099–1104. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70011-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Koss L. G. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy. JAMA. 1989 Feb 3;261(5):737–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Koutsky L. A., Holmes K. K., Critchlow C. W., Stevens C. E., Paavonen J., Beckmann A. M., DeRouen T. A., Galloway D. A., Vernon D., Kiviat N. B. A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection. N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 29;327(18):1272–1278. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210293271804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lerman C., Miller S. M., Scarborough R., Hanjani P., Nolte S., Smith D. Adverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep;165(3):658–662. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90304-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ley P. Professional non-compliance: a neglected problem. Br J Clin Psychol. 1981 Sep;20(Pt 3):151–154. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1981.tb00512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lurie N., Slater J., McGovern P., Ekstrum J., Quam L., Margolis K. Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter? N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 12;329(7):478–482. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308123290707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Macgregor J. E., Campbell M. K., Mann E. M., Swanson K. Y. Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in north east Scotland shows fall in incidence and mortality from invasive cancer with concomitant rise in preinvasive disease. BMJ. 1994 May 28;308(6941):1407–1411. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6941.1407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mangan S. A., Legano L. A., Rosen C. M., McHugh M. T., Fierman A. H., Dreyer B. P., Palusci V. J., Winkler B. Increased prevalence of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in urban adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 May;151(5):481–484. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170420051008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Massad L. S., Meyer P., Hobbs J. Knowledge of cervical cancer screening among women attending urban colposcopy clinics. Cancer Detect Prev. 1997;21(1):103–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McAvoy B. R., Raza R. Can health education increase uptake of cervical smear testing among Asian women? BMJ. 1991 Apr 6;302(6780):833–836. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6780.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McDonald T. W., Neutens J. J., Fischer L. M., Jessee D. Impact of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis and treatment on self-esteem and body image. Gynecol Oncol. 1989 Sep;34(3):345–349. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90170-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Miller S. M. Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer. 1995 Jul 15;76(2):167–177. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<167::aid-cncr2820760203>3.0.co;2-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Miller S. M., Roussi P., Altman D., Helm W., Steinberg A. Effects of coping style on psychological reactions of low-income, minority women to colposcopy. J Reprod Med. 1994 Sep;39(9):711–718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Miller S. M., Siejak K. K., Schroeder C. M., Lerman C., Hernandez E., Helm C. W. Enhancing adherence following abnormal Pap smears among low-income minority women: a preventive telephone counseling strategy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 May 21;89(10):703–708. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.10.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Murray M., McMillan C. Social and behavioural predictors of women's cancer screening practices in Northern Ireland. J Public Health Med. 1993 Jun;15(2):147–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Naish J., Brown J., Denton B. Intercultural consultations: investigation of factors that deter non-English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening. BMJ. 1994 Oct 29;309(6962):1126–1128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Najem G. R., Batuman F., Smith A. M. Papanicolaou test status among inner-city adolescent girls. Am J Prev Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;12(6):482–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nathoo V. Investigation of non-responders at a cervical cancer screening clinic in Manchester. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Apr 9;296(6628):1041–1042. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6628.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Noller K. L. Incident and demographic trends in cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 2):1088–1090. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Nugent L. S., Tamlyn-Leaman K. The colposcopy experience: what do women know? J Adv Nurs. 1992 Apr;17(4):514–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01937.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Orbell S., Crombie I., Robertson A., Johnston G., Kenicer M. Assessing the effectiveness of a screening campaign: who is missed by 80% cervical screening coverage? J R Soc Med. 1995 Jul;88(7):389–394. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Palmer A. G., Tucker S., Warren R., Adams M. Understanding women's responses to treatment for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. Br J Clin Psychol. 1993 Feb;32(Pt 1):101–112. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1993.tb01033.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Parazzini F., La Vecchia C., Negri E., Cecchetti G., Fedele L. Reproductive factors and the risk of invasive and intraepithelial cervical neoplasia. Br J Cancer. 1989 May;59(5):805–809. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Parkin D. M., Pisani P., Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. Int J Cancer. 1993 Jun 19;54(4):594–606. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Paskett E. D., Carter W. B., Chu J., White E. Compliance behavior in women with abnormal Pap smears. Developing and testing a decision model. Med Care. 1990 Jul;28(7):643–656. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Paskett E. D., White E., Carter W. B., Chu J. Improving follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 1990 Nov;19(6):630–641. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90060-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Peters R. K., Bear M. B., Thomas D. Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix. Prev Med. 1989 Jan;18(1):133–146. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(89)90059-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Seow A., Wong M. L., Smith W. C., Lee H. P. Beliefs and attitudes as determinants of cervical cancer screening: a community-based study in Singapore. Prev Med. 1995 Mar;24(2):134–141. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Shen R. N., Hicks D. A., Cruickshank M. E. Colposcopy services provided by Genito-Urinary Medicine clinics in the United Kingdom--British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology/National Co-ordinating Network Survey, 1993. Int J STD AIDS. 1996 Mar-Apr;7(2):98–101. doi: 10.1258/0956462961917456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Stanton A. L. Determinants of adherence to medical regimens by hypertensive patients. J Behav Med. 1987 Aug;10(4):377–394. doi: 10.1007/BF00846477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Stewart D. E., Buchegger P. M., Lickrish G. M., Sierra S. The effect of educational brochures on follow-up compliance in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;83(4):583–585. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199404000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Stewart D. E., Lickrish G. M., Sierra S., Parkin H. The effect of educational brochures on knowledge and emotional distress in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;81(2):280–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Suarez L., Roche R. A., Nichols D., Simpson D. M. Knowledge, behavior, and fears concerning breast and cervical cancer among older low-income Mexican-American women. Am J Prev Med. 1997 Mar-Apr;13(2):137–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Summers A., Fullard B. Improving the coverage and quality of cervical screening: women's views. J Public Health Med. 1995 Sep;17(3):277–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Weiss L. K., Kau T. Y., Sparks B. T., Swanson G. M. Trends in cervical cancer incidence among young black and white women in metropolitan Detroit. Cancer. 1994 Apr 1;73(7):1849–1854. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940401)73:7<1849::aid-cncr2820730712>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wilkinson C., Jones J. M., McBride J. Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial. BMJ. 1990 Feb 17;300(6722):440–440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6722.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wolfe C., Doherty I., Raju K. S., Holtom R., Richardson P. First steps in the development of an information and counselling service for women with an abnormal smear result. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992 Jul 24;45(3):201–206. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(92)90085-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wolfendale M. R., King S., Usherwood M. M. Abnormal cervical smears: are we in for an epidemic? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Aug 20;287(6391):526–528. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6391.526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES