Abstract
BACKGROUND: Practice management (PM) in general practice is as yet ill-defined; a systematic description of its domain, as well as a valid method to assess it, are necessary for research and assessment. AIM: To develop and validate a method to assess PM of general practitioners (GPs) and practices. METHOD: Relevant and potentially discriminating indicators were selected from a systematic framework of 2410 elements of PM to be used in an assessment method (VIP = visit instrument PM). The method was first tested in a pilot study and, after revision, was evaluated in order to select discriminating indicators and to determine validity of dimensions (factor and reliability analysis, linear regression). RESULTS: One hundred and ten GPs were assessed with the practice visit method using 249 indicators; 208 of these discriminated sufficiently at practice level or at GP level. Factor analysis resulted in 34 dimensions and in a taxonomy of PM. Dimensions and indicators showed marked variation between GPs and practices. Training practices scored higher on five dimensions; single-handed and dispensing practices scored lower on delegated tasks, but higher on accessibility and availability. CONCLUSION: A visit method to assess PM has been developed and its validity studied systematically. The taxonomy and dimensions of PM were in line with other classifications. Selection of a balanced number of useful and relevant indicators was nevertheless difficult. The dimensions could discriminate between groups of GPs and practices, establishing the value of the method for assessment. The VIP method could be an important contribution to the introduction of continuous quality improvement in the profession.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (52.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker R. General practice in Gloucestershire, Avon and Somerset: explaining variations in standards. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Oct;42(363):415–418. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker R., Streatfield J. What type of general practice do patients prefer? Exploration of practice characteristics influencing patient satisfaction. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):654–659. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berwick D. M. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 5;320(1):53–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901053200110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell L. M., Howie J. G., Murray T. S. Use of videotaped consultations in summative assessment of trainees in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Mar;45(392):137–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fraser R. C., McKinley R. K., Mulholland H. Consultation competence in general practice: establishing the face validity of prioritized criteria in the Leicester assessment package. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Mar;44(380):109–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fraser R. C., McKinley R. K., Mulholland H. Consultation competence in general practice: testing the reliability of the Leicester assessment package. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jul;44(384):293–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Groenewegen P. P., Hutten J. B. Workload and job satisfaction among general practitioners: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(10):1111–1119. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90087-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harden R. M., Gleeson F. A. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979 Jan;13(1):41–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson N. Feasibility of developing and selecting criteria for the assessment of clinical performance. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Dec;43(377):499–502. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rethans J. J., van Leeuwen Y., Drop R., van der Vleuten C., Sturmans F. Competence and performance: two different concepts in the assessment of quality of medical care. Fam Pract. 1990 Sep;7(3):168–174. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.3.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salisbury C. The Australian Quality Assurance and Continuing Education Program as a model for the reaccreditation of general practitioners in the United Kingdom. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 May;47(418):319–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilmot J., Davies C. Quality improvement in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jun;47(419):343–344. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]