Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1998 Dec;48(437):1824–1827.

Understanding patient-initiated frequent attendance in primary care: a case-control study.

K Báez 1, J M Aiarzaguena 1, G Grandes 1, E Pedrero 1, J Aranguren 1, A Retolaza 1
PMCID: PMC1313286  PMID: 10198500

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequent attendance, which accounts for a high proportion of the general practitioner's (GP's) workload, is still poorly understood. AIM: To assess the association and impact of exposure to chronic physical illness, mental disorders, life stress, and sociodemographic factors on the frequent attendance of primary health care medical services. METHOD: Nine general practices in Bizkaia, Spain, participated in a case-control study. Cases were patients who exceeded the 90th percentile in the distribution of the number of visits that they made on their own initiative from January 1993 to March 1994. Controls were those for whom a single, patient-initiated consultation was registered. A total of 102 cases and 100 controls were selected by stratified sampling proportional to the size of each practice. We estimated odds ratios and population attributable fractions for frequent attendance in relation to being exposed to the study variables, adjusted by demographic characteristics by means of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Medium-high life stress (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 4.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-12.8), chronic physical illness (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.4-6.9), mental disorder (AOR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.3-5.1), and age were associated with patient-initiated frequent attendance. The adjusted population attributable fraction for chronic physical illness was 41%, 30.9% for mental disorder, and 15.2% for life stress. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that patient-initiated frequent attendance is related to genuine physical and psychosocial needs; therefore, recognition requires a bio-psychosocial approach on the part of GP.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (33.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barsky A. J., Borus J. F. Somatization and medicalization in the era of managed care. JAMA. 1995 Dec 27;274(24):1931–1934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellón Saameño J. A., Delgado Sánchez A., Luna del Castillo J. D., Lardelli Claret P. Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de apoyo social functional Duke-UNC-11. Aten Primaria. 1996 Sep 15;18(4):153-6, 158-63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellón Saameño J. A., Delgado Sánchez A., Luna del Castillo J. D., Lardelli Claret P. Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de función familiar Apgar-familiar. Aten Primaria. 1996 Oct 15;18(6):289–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Broadhead W. E., Gehlbach S. H., de Gruy F. V., Kaplan B. H. The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):709–723. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruzzi P., Green S. B., Byar D. P., Brinton L. A., Schairer C. Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Nov;122(5):904–914. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Counte M. A., Glandon G. L. A panel study of life stress, social support, and the health services utilization of older persons. Med Care. 1991 Apr;29(4):348–361. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199104000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dowrick C., May C., Richardson M., Bundred P. The biopsychosocial model of general practice: rhetoric or reality? Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):105–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dowrick C. Why do the O'Sheas consult so often? An exploration of complex family illness behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Mar;34(5):491–497. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90204-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gerrard T. J., Riddell J. D. Difficult patients: black holes and secrets. BMJ. 1988 Aug 20;297(6647):530–532. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6647.530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hibbard J. H., Pope C. R. Age differences in the use of medical care in an HMO. An application of the behavioral model. Med Care. 1986 Jan;24(1):52–66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198601000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holmes T. H., Rahe R. H. The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. J Psychosom Res. 1967 Aug;11(2):213–218. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karlsson H., Lehtinen V., Joukamaa M. Frequent attenders of Finnish public primary health care: sociodemographic characteristics and physical morbidity. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):424–430. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karlsson H., Lehtinen V., Joukamaa M. Psychiatric morbidity among frequent attender patients in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1995 Jan;17(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(94)00059-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mathers N. J., Gask L. Surviving the 'heartsink' experience. Fam Pract. 1995 Jun;12(2):176–183. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.2.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Neal R. D. Frequent attenders. Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;12(3):370–370. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.3.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Neal R. D., Heywood P. L., Morley S., Clayden A. D., Dowell A. C. Frequency of patients' consulting in general practice and workload generated by frequent attenders: comparisons between practices. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Jan;48(426):895–898. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schrire S. Frequent attenders--a review. Fam Pract. 1986 Dec;3(4):272–275. doi: 10.1093/fampra/3.4.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smilkstein G., Ashworth C., Montano D. Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function. J Fam Pract. 1982 Aug;15(2):303–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ustün T. B., Tien A. Y. Recent developments for diagnostic measures in psychiatry. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(1):210–220. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Westhead J. N. Frequent attenders in general practice: medical, psychological and social characteristics. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Jul;35(276):337–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES