Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1998 Dec;48(437):1833–1836.

Deliberate departures from good general practice: a study of motives among Dutch general practitioners.

M Veldhuis 1, L Wigersma 1, I Okkes 1
PMCID: PMC1313288  PMID: 10198502

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When general practitioners (GPs) act contrary to their own standards of good practice, they usually cite patient demands as the main reason. However, up until now, studies have relied on doctors' recollections of departures from their own norms, which may be unreliable. AIM: To systematically explore GPs' motives for deliberate departures from their own conception of good practice. METHOD: Forty-nine GPs, over five days, registered to what extent they had deviated from their own norms, and recorded the motives underlying any deviation. RESULTS: Of the 6087 consultations registered, 10% contained some departure from 'good' general practice, the majority (75%) of which was perceived by the doctor concerned as 'slight'. Doctors underpinned their departures mostly by referring to the doctor-patient relationship: the wish to be nice was used, on average, in 42% of deviations, and the wish to prevent a conflict in 30%. The most important non-relational motive was clinical uncertainty, which doctors used in 11% of their cases. DISCUSSION: Contrary to common belief, GPs often comply with patient requests because they wish to, and not because they feel forced to. Whether or not this behaviour affects the quality of care is largely dependent on the model of 'good' general practice used.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (30.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong D., Fry J., Armstrong P. Doctors' perceptions of pressure from patients for referral. BMJ. 1991 May 18;302(6786):1186–1188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6786.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradley C. P. Factors which influence the decision whether or not to prescribe: the dilemma facing general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Nov;42(364):454–458. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bredfeldt R. C., Ripani A., Jr, Cuddeback G. L. Emotional response to malpractice suits: should residents be prepared? Fam Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;19(6):465–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Britten N. Patients' demands for prescriptions in primary care. BMJ. 1995 Apr 29;310(6987):1084–1085. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6987.1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Britten N., Ukoumunne O. The influence of patients' hopes of receiving a prescription on doctors' perceptions and the decision to prescribe: a questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1997 Dec 6;315(7121):1506–1510. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cockburn J., Pit S. Prescribing behaviour in clinical practice: patients' expectations and doctors' perceptions of patients' expectations--a questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997 Aug 30;315(7107):520–523. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7107.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conroy M., Shannon W. Clinical guidelines: their implementation in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jul;45(396):371–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fleuren M., Grol R., de Haan M., Wijkel D. Care for the imminent miscarriage by midwives and GPs. Fam Pract. 1994 Sep;11(3):275–281. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.3.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grol R. National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Sep;40(338):361–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lamberts H., Hofmans-Okkes I. Values and roles in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;42(2):178–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lamberts H., Janssens P. M. Defensief handelen door huisartsen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1984 Mar 31;128(13):598–602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levinson W., Stiles W. B., Inui T. S., Engle R. Physician frustration in communicating with patients. Med Care. 1993 Apr;31(4):285–295. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199304000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Macfarlane J., Holmes W., Macfarlane R., Britten N. Influence of patients' expectations on antibiotic management of acute lower respiratory tract illness in general practice: questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997 Nov 8;315(7117):1211–1214. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7117.1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Newton J., Hayes V., Hutchinson A. Factors influencing general practitioners' referral decisions. Fam Pract. 1991 Dec;8(4):308–313. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.4.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schwartz R. K., Soumerai S. B., Avorn J. Physician motivations for nonscientific drug prescribing. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(6):577–582. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90252-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Veldhuis M. Defensive behavior of Dutch family physicians. Widening the concept. Fam Med. 1994 Jan;26(1):27–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Virji A., Britten N. A study of the relationship between patients' attitudes and doctors' prescribing. Fam Pract. 1991 Dec;8(4):314–319. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.4.314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Webb S., Lloyd M. Prescribing and referral in general practice: a study of patients' expectations and doctors' actions. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Apr;44(381):165–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Marco P., Dain C., Lockwood T., Roland M. How valuable is feedback of information on hospital referral patterns? BMJ. 1993 Dec 4;307(6917):1465–1466. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6917.1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES