Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Jan;49(438):11–15.

General practitioners' use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them.

C Watkins 1, I Harvey 1, C Langley 1, S Gray 1, A Faulkner 1
PMCID: PMC1313310  PMID: 10622009

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is concern about the apparent lack of uptake of management and referral guideline information by general practitioners (GPs) in their day-to-day consultations with patients. Little is understood about the barriers to the uptake of guidelines as perceived by GPs. AIMS: To explore how GPs gain access to and use guidelines, including computer-based guidelines, in day-to-day consultations with their patients; and to identify the perceived problems and barriers to the use of guidelines in such situations. METHOD: Postal questionnaires enquiring about the practices and attitudes towards the use of guidelines in general practice were completed by 391 of 600 randomly selected GPs in the South and West NHS region. RESULTS: GPs found guidelines a useful method of accessing expert information. Key factors in their uptake were brevity, an authoritative and unbiased source of evidence, and resonance with the GP's usual practices; they also needed to be flexible enough to incorporate individual viewpoints. Guidelines were perceived as being valuable to enable safe delegation of care to other health professionals and for sharing decision-making with patients. Dissemination of guidelines through the medium of computers was acceptable to the majority of GPs. Virtually all (93%) responders reported adapting guidelines to the needs of individual patients. Older GPs from non-fundholding practices were least likely to show a positive attitude towards guidelines. CONCLUSION: In principle, there is a very positive attitude towards the use of guidelines in general practice. However, those developing guidelines for use by GPs in the consulting room need to be aware of the factors that facilitate their use in practice. Educational strategies aimed at increasing the use of guidelines need to take into account the significant proportion who show negative attitudes towards guidelines, whose characteristics have been identified in this study.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (45.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brook R. H. Practice guidelines and practicing medicine. Are they compatible? JAMA. 1989 Dec 1;262(21):3027–3030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dans P. E. Credibility, cookbook medicine, and common sense: guidelines and the college. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 1;120(11):966–968. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Delamothe T. Wanted: guidelines that doctors will follow. BMJ. 1993 Jul 24;307(6898):218–218. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6898.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eddy D. M. Practice policies: where do they come from? JAMA. 1990 Mar 2;263(9):1265–passim. doi: 10.1001/jama.263.9.1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gill P., Dowell A. C., Neal R. D., Smith N., Heywood P., Wilson A. E. Evidence based general practice: a retrospective study of interventions in one training practice. BMJ. 1996 Mar 30;312(7034):819–821. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7034.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grimshaw J. M., Hutchinson A. Clinical practice guidelines--do they enhance value for money in health care? Br Med Bull. 1995 Oct;51(4):927–940. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a073006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grol R. Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care. 1992 Sep;1(3):184–191. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.3.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haines A. The science of perpetual change. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):115–119. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klazinga N. Compliance with practice guidelines: clinical autonomy revisited. Health Policy. 1994 Mar;28(1):51–66. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(94)90020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Langley C., Faulkner A., Watkins C., Gray S., Harvey I. Use of guidelines in primary care--practitioners' perspectives. Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):105–111. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.2.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McGuire L. B. A long run for a short jump: understanding clinical guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 1;113(9):705–708. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-9-705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Newton J., Knight D., Woolhead G. General practitioners and clinical guidelines: a survey of knowledge, use and beliefs. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Sep;46(410):513–517. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Siriwardena A. N. Clinical guidelines in primary care: a survey of general practitioners' attitudes and behaviour. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):643–647. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tanenbaum S. J. What physicians know. N Engl J Med. 1993 Oct 21;329(17):1268–1271. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199310213291713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Woolf S. H. Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 1992 May;152(5):946–952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Worrall G., Chaulk P. Hope or experience? Clinical practice guidelines in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1996 Apr;42(4):353–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES