Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although there is some published work acknowledging that the general practice receptionist's role is both important and difficult, receptionists' own views have rarely been sought. AIM: To explore general practice receptionists' ideas and feelings about their work. METHOD: A questionnaire was distributed to all 150 receptionists in a representative sample of 26 practices in the area covered by Leeds family health services authority. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a representative group of 20 receptionists selected from the questionnaire sample. RESULTS: All responders were women, 60% were over 40 years old, and about half had been in the post for more than five years; four-fifths worked part-time. They had chosen the job because it dovetailed with the rest of their lives. Responders derived satisfaction from helping patients, meeting people, having good relationships with colleagues, and doing varied work. Sources of stress included difficult patients, work pressure, problems finding appointments for patients, and feeling caught between doctors' and patients' demands. Responders' experiences and views of training were diverse. Practice managers were important in making them feel consulted and supported. All had a sense of teamwork with colleagues, but many did not perceive the whole practice as a team. Many felt doctors failed to appreciate the pressure and complexity of their work. CONCLUSIONS: Receptionists' work is complex, demanding and intense, involving a high level of commitment to patients, colleagues, and the practice. Recommendations include improved appointment systems, a positive role for practice managers in relation to reception staff, and individual planning of receptionists' training. Effective teamwork among receptionists should be recognized and developed. General practitioners (GPs) are recommended to develop a greater understanding of receptionists' work.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (42.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arber S., Sawyer L. The role of the receptionist in general practice: a 'dragon behind the desk'? Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(9):911–921. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90347-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Copeman J. P., Van Zwanenberg T. D. Practice receptionists: poorly trained and taken for granted? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Jan;38(306):14–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fishbacher C. M., Robertson R. A. Patients' difficulties in obtaining appointments--a general practice audit. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Jun;36(287):282–284. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimshaw J., Youngs H. Towards better practice management: a national survey of Scottish general practice management. J Manag Med. 1994;8(2):56–64. doi: 10.1108/02689239410059642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R. Why do qualitative research? BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):2–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mays N., Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109–112. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Middleton J. F. Modifying the behaviour of doctors and their receptionists in recurrent stressful situations. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Feb;39(319):62–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton J., Hunt J., Stirling J. Human resource management in general practice: survey of current practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):81–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson P., Jones K. The primary health care non-team. BMJ. 1994 Nov 26;309(6966):1387–1388. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]