Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Mar;49(440):223–229.

Is default from colposcopy a problem, and if so what can we do? A systematic review of the literature.

H Lester 1, S Wilson 1
PMCID: PMC1313379  PMID: 10343430

Abstract

It has been reported that many women referred to outpatient colposcopy clinics fail to attend for their appointments. The aim of this paper is to search the literature to assess the extent of default from colposcopy and to identify interventions, suitable for implementation within primary care, to reduce the proportion of women defaulting. Searches were performed on MEDLINE, PsychLIT, Bids and Cancerlit from 1986 to September 1997 using the terms colposcopy or cervical/Pap smear in association with default, non-attendance, adherence, patient compliance, treatment refusal, patient dropouts, attendance, barriers or intervention. The inclusion criteria for primary papers were that they contained data that enables the calculation of default rates for colposcopy or the results of interventions aimed at improving the default rates. Thirteen publications describing default rates and four describing interventions were included as primary papers. Combining the data from these studies suggests default rates of 3%, 11%, and 12% for assessment/treatment visits, first review, and second review respectively. The intervention studies suggested a need to tailor the intervention to the population and the type of information to suit the individual. Varying definitions make comparison of default rates difficult, and the use of a crude non-attendance rate may result in an overestimate of default rates. The vast majority of women invited to colposcopy eventually attend. It is questionable if there is a need for interventions to increase compliance. Where necessary, greater cooperation across the primary/secondary care interface and use of the extended primary care team may be a more cost-effective means of increasing compliance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (57.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Austoker J. Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer. BMJ. 1994 Jul 23;309(6949):241–248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6949.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailie R., Barron P., Learmonth G. Towards a rational cervical cytology screening strategy. Case study of a peri-urban settlement. S Afr Med J. 1995 Jan;85(1):30–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benedet J. L., Miller D. M., Nickerson K. G. Results of conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jan;79(1):105–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boag F. C., Dillon A. M., Catalan J., Edwards R., Barton S. E. Assessment of psychiatric morbidity in patients attending a colposcopy clinic situated in a genitourinary medicine clinic. Genitourin Med. 1991 Dec;67(6):481–484. doi: 10.1136/sti.67.6.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowman J., Sanson-Fisher R., Boyle C., Pope S., Redman S. A randomised controlled trial of strategies to prompt attendance for a Pap smear. J Med Screen. 1995;2(4):211–218. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campion M. J., Brown J. R., McCance D. J., Atia W., Edwards R., Cuzick J., Singer A. Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Feb;95(2):175–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carey P., Gjerdingen D. K. Follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women of different races. J Fam Pract. 1993 Dec;37(6):583–587. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Crombie I. K., Orbell S., Johnston G., Robertson A. J., Kenicer M. Cervical screening: the optimum visit plan for contacting users and non-users in Scotland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Dec;48(6):586–589. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.6.586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Denny L. A., Soeters R., Dehaeck K., Bloch B. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Jul;102(7):545–548. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. EDERER F., AXTELL L. M., CUTLER S. J. The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1961 Sep;6:101–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eger R. R., Peipert J. F. Risk factors for noncompliance in a colposcopy clinic. J Reprod Med. 1996 Sep;41(9):671–674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferenczy A., Choukroun D., Arseneau J. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: advantages and potential pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;87(3):332–337. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00453-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferris D. G., Hainer B. L., Pfenninger J. L., Zuber T. J., DeWitt D. E., Line R. L. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1995 Oct;41(4):337–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Flannelly G., Anderson D., Kitchener H. C., Mann E. M., Campbell M., Fisher P., Walker F., Templeton A. A. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis. BMJ. 1994 May 28;308(6941):1399–1403. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6941.1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Flannelly G., Langhan H., Jandial L., Mana E., Campbell M., Kitchener H. A study of treatment failures following large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jun;104(6):718–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11983.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Frankel S., Farrow A., West R. Non-attendance or non-invitation? A case-control study of failed outpatient appointments. BMJ. 1989 May 20;298(6684):1343–1345. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6684.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gath D. H., Hallam N., Mynors-Wallis L., Day A., Bond S. A. Emotional reactions in women attending a UK colposcopy clinic. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Feb;49(1):79–83. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Giuffrida A., Torgerson D. J. Should we pay the patient? Review of financial incentives to enhance patient compliance. BMJ. 1997 Sep 20;315(7110):703–707. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7110.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones M. H., Jenkins D., Cuzick J., Wolfendale M. R., Jones J. J., Balogun-Lynch C., Usherwood M. M., Singer A. Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance. Lancet. 1992 Jun 13;339(8807):1440–1443. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92031-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kavanagh A. M., Broom D. H. Women's understanding of abnormal cervical smear test results: a qualitative interview study. BMJ. 1997 May 10;314(7091):1388–1391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7091.1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kavanagh A. M., Simpson J. M. Predicting nonattendance for colposcopy clinic follow-up after referral for an abnormal Pap smear. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1996 Jun;20(3):266–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1996.tb01027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Laedtke T. W., Dignan M. Compliance with therapy for cervical dysplasia among women of low socioeconomic status. South Med J. 1992 Jan;85(1):5–8. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199201000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lauver D., Rubin M. Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. Res Nurs Health. 1990 Jun;13(3):199–207. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770130309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lerman C., Hanjani P., Caputo C., Miller S., Delmoor E., Nolte S., Engstrom P. Telephone counseling improves adherence to colposcopy among lower-income minority women. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Feb;10(2):330–333. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.2.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lerman C., Miller S. M., Scarborough R., Hanjani P., Nolte S., Smith D. Adverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep;165(3):658–662. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90304-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Marcus A. C., Crane L. A., Kaplan C. P., Reading A. E., Savage E., Gunning J., Bernstein G., Berek J. S. Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies. Med Care. 1992 Mar;30(3):216–230. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199203000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marteau T. M., Walker P., Giles J., Smail M. Anxieties in women undergoing colposcopy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Sep;97(9):859–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02586.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller S. M., Siejak K. K., Schroeder C. M., Lerman C., Hernandez E., Helm C. W. Enhancing adherence following abnormal Pap smears among low-income minority women: a preventive telephone counseling strategy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 May 21;89(10):703–708. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.10.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mitchell H., Hoy J., Temple-Smith M., Quinn M. A study of women who appear to default from management of an abnormal Pap smear. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Feb;32(1):54–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1992.tb01901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Montz F. J., Monk B. J., Fowler J. M., Nguyen L. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Sep;80(3 Pt 1):385–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mould T. A., Rodgers M. E., Singer A. The psychological reaction of women to a colposcopy clinic. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 May;102(5):428–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11306.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Murphy M., Pomeroy L., Tynan M., Murphy J. F., Mulcahy F. M. Cervical cytological screening in HIV-infected women in Dublin--a six-year review. Int J STD AIDS. 1995 Jul-Aug;6(4):262–266. doi: 10.1177/095646249500600408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nathan P. M., Moss T. R. Screening colposcopy in genitourinary medicine. Int J STD AIDS. 1991 Sep-Oct;2(5):342–345. doi: 10.1177/095646249100200506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Paskett E. D., Phillips K. C., Miller M. E. Improving compliance among women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;86(3):353–359. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00176-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Paskett E. D., White E., Carter W. B., Chu J. Improving follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 1990 Nov;19(6):630–641. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90060-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Patterson T., Roworth M., Hill M. An investigation into the default rate at the Fife colposcopy clinic: implications for target setting. J Public Health Med. 1995 Mar;17(1):65–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reelick N. F., de Haes W. F., Schuurman J. H. Psychological side-effects of the mass screening on cervical cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(12):1089–1093. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90169-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reid G. S., Robertson A. J., Bissett C., Smith J., Waugh N., Halkerston R. Cervical screening in Perth and Kinross since introduction of the new contract. BMJ. 1991 Aug 24;303(6800):447–450. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6800.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rickert V. I., Kozlowski K. J., Warren A. M., Hendon A., Davis P. Adolescents and colposcopy: the use of different procedures to reduce anxiety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;170(2):504–508. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70218-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Roberts R. A., Blunt S. M. The psychological reaction of women to a colposcopy clinic. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Sep;101(9):751–752. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11939.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Roberts R. A., Blunt S. M. The psychological reaction of women to a colposcopy clinic. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Sep;101(9):751–752. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11939.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ross J. D., McIver A., Blakely A., Dalrymple J., Peacock W., Wallis C. Why do patients default from follow-up at a genitourinary clinic?: a multivariate analysis. Genitourin Med. 1995 Dec;71(6):393–395. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.6.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sanders G., Craddock C., Wagstaff I. Factors influencing default at a hospital colposcopy clinic. Qual Health Care. 1992 Dec;1(4):236–240. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.4.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schofield M. J., Sanson-Fisher R., Halpin S., Redman S. Notification and follow-up of Pap test results: current practice and women's preferences. Prev Med. 1994 May;23(3):276–283. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1994.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shen R. N., Hicks D. A., Cruickshank M. E. Colposcopy services provided by Genito-Urinary Medicine clinics in the United Kingdom--British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology/National Co-ordinating Network Survey, 1993. Int J STD AIDS. 1996 Mar-Apr;7(2):98–101. doi: 10.1258/0956462961917456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Singer A. The abnormal cervical smear. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Dec 13;293(6561):1551–1556. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6561.1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Spitzer M., Chernys A. E., Seltzer V. L. The use of large-loop excision of the transformation zone in an inner-city population. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Nov;82(5):731–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Stewart D. E., Buchegger P. M., Lickrish G. M., Sierra S. The effect of educational brochures on follow-up compliance in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;83(4):583–585. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199404000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Stewart D. E., Lickrish G. M., Sierra S., Parkin H. The effect of educational brochures on knowledge and emotional distress in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;81(2):280–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Towler B. P., Irwig L. M., Shelley J. M. The adequacy of management of women with CIN 2 and CIN 3 Pap smear abnormalities. Med J Aust. 1993 Oct 18;159(8):523, 526-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilkinson C. Abnormal cervical smear test results: old dilemmas and new directions. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Aug;42(361):336–339. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wilkinson C., Jones J. M., McBride J. Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial. BMJ. 1990 Feb 17;300(6722):440–440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6722.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Woolley P. D., Hicks D. A. Audit of a genitourinary-based colposcopy service. Int J STD AIDS. 1992 Jan-Feb;3(1):63–63. doi: 10.1177/095646249200300119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Woolley P. D., Talbot M. D. Experience in Sheffield: follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology. Int J STD AIDS. 1990 Mar;1(2):95–97. doi: 10.1177/095646249000100204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES