Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Apr;49(441):263–267.

Clinical and patient satisfaction outcomes of a new treatment for somatized mental disorder taught to general practitioners.

R K Morriss 1, L Gask 1, C Ronalds 1, E Downes-Grainger 1, H Thompson 1, D Goldberg 1
PMCID: PMC1313389  PMID: 10736901

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with mental disorder presenting with medically unexplained symptoms (somatized mental disorder) are common in primary care, difficult to treat, and function poorly in their daily lives. AIM: To examine the effects on patient outcome and satisfaction of a training package for somatized mental disorder delivered to general practitioners (GPs). METHOD: A prospective study of a before-and-after training study of different cohorts of patients attending eight GPs who acted as their own controls. Patients were stratified according to their belief that the presenting medical symptom had either a partial or completely physical cause. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients in the cohort before training, and 112 patients in the cohort after training, were diagnosed with somatized mental disorder by the study GPs. After training there were significant improvements in interview-rated psychiatric disorder (P = 0.032) at one month, self-rated psychiatric disorder (P = 0.024), and global function (P = 0.020) at three months in patients who believed their symptoms to have a partial physical cause. Training at one-month follow-up reduced depressive symptoms in patients with major depression but did not significantly change any other outcome in patients who believed their symptoms had only a physical cause. There was no overall change in patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Training GPs clinically benefited patients with somatized mental disorder who believe that their symptoms have a partial physical cause.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (50.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bridges K. W., Goldberg D. P. Somatic presentation of DSM III psychiatric disorders in primary care. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(6):563–569. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90064-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bridges K., Goldberg D., Evans B., Sharpe T. Determinants of somatization in primary care. Psychol Med. 1991 May;21(2):473–483. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700020584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Craig T. K., Boardman A. P., Mills K., Daly-Jones O., Drake H. The South London Somatisation Study. I: Longitudinal course and the influence of early life experiences. Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;163:579–588. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.5.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Derogatis L. R., Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983 Aug;13(3):595–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Escobar J. I., Golding J. M., Hough R. L., Karno M., Burnam M. A., Wells K. B. Somatization in the community: relationship to disability and use of services. Am J Public Health. 1987 Jul;77(7):837–840. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.7.837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gask L., Goldberg D., Porter R., Creed F. The treatment of somatization: evaluation of a teaching package with general practice trainees. J Psychosom Res. 1989;33(6):697–703. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(89)90085-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldberg D., Gask L., O'Dowd T. The treatment of somatization: teaching techniques of reattribution. J Psychosom Res. 1989;33(6):689–695. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(89)90084-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaaya S., Goldberg D., Gask L. Management of somatic presentations of psychiatric illness in general medical settings: evaluation of a new training course for general practitioners. Med Educ. 1992 Mar;26(2):138–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kirmayer L. J., Robbins J. M. Patients who somatize in primary care: a longitudinal study of cognitive and social characteristics. Psychol Med. 1996 Sep;26(5):937–951. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700035273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kisely S. R., Faragher B., Gask L., Goldberg D. P. Measuring psychiatric disorder in the recent past: the use of the Psychiatric Assessment Schedule retrospectively. Psychol Med. 1992 May;22(2):457–463. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700030403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lobo A., Garcia-Campayo J., Campos R., Marcos G., Perez-Echeverria M. J. Somatisation in primary care in Spain: I. Estimates of prevalence and clinical characteristics. Working Group for the Study of the Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Morbidity in Zaragoza. Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;168(3):344–348. doi: 10.1192/bjp.168.3.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morriss R., Gask L., Ronalds C., Downes-Grainger E., Thompson H., Leese B., Goldberg D. Cost-effectiveness of a new treatment for somatized mental disorder taught to GPs. Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):119–125. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.2.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith G. R., Jr, Monson R. A., Ray D. C. Psychiatric consultation in somatization disorder. A randomized controlled study. N Engl J Med. 1986 May 29;314(22):1407–1413. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198605293142203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith G. R., Jr, Rost K., Kashner T. M. A trial of the effect of a standardized psychiatric consultation on health outcomes and costs in somatizing patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Mar;52(3):238–243. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950150070012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stewart A. L., Hays R. D., Ware J. E., Jr The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724–735. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilkinson P., Mynors-Wallis L. Problem-solving therapy in the treatment of unexplained physical symptoms in primary care: a preliminary study. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Aug;38(6):591–598. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90056-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES