Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 May;49(442):375–379.

Collation and comparison of multi-practice audit data: prevalence and treatment of known diabetes mellitus.

K Khunti 1, E Goyder 1, R Baker 1
PMCID: PMC1313423  PMID: 10736888

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different methods have been used to determine the prevalence and treatment of diabetes. Despite the large number of studies, previous estimations of prevalence and treatment have been carried out on relatively small numbers of patients, and then in only a few practices in single geographical regions. AIM: To investigate the feasibility of collating data from multi-practice audits organized by primary care audit groups in order to estimate the prevalence and treatment of patients with known diabetes, and to discuss the methodological issues and reasons for variation. METHOD: A postal questionnaire survey of all primary care audit groups in England and Wales that had conducted a multi-practice audit of diabetes between 1993-1995. Prevalence rates and patterns of diabetic care were compared with other community-based surveys of known diabetes from 1986-1996 identified on MEDLINE. RESULTS: Twenty-five (43%) audit groups supplied data from multi-practice audits of diabetes. Seven (28%) multi-practice audits involving 259 practices fulfilled the inclusion criteria for prevalence estimation. The overall prevalence of diabetes based on a population of 1,475,512 patients was 1.46% (range between audit groups = 1.18% to 1.66%; chi 2 = 308; df = 6; P < 0.0001). Male to female ratio was 1.15:1. Treatment of diabetes could be ascertained for 10 (40%) audit groups comprising 319 practices. Of these, 23.4% (range = 16.5%-27.4%) were controlled by diet, 48.5% (range = 43.6%-55.8%) were prescribed oral hypoglycaemic drugs, and 28.2% (range = 25.0%-32.4%) were treated with insulin. There were significant variations between audit groups in treatment pattern (chi 2 = 250; df = 18; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Prevalence and treatment rates of diabetes and other chronic diseases can be assessed and compared using data from multi-practice audits. Collation of audit data could improve the precision of quantitative estimates of health status in populations. A standard method of data recording and collection may provide a new approach that could considerably improve our ability to monitor disease and its management.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (50.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R., Hearnshaw H., Cooper A., Cheater F., Robertson N. Assessing the work of medical audit advisory groups in promoting audit in general practice. Qual Health Care. 1995 Dec;4(4):234–239. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benett I. J., Lambert C., Hinds G., Kirton C. Emerging standards for diabetes care from a city-wide primary care audit. Diabet Med. 1994 Jun;11(5):489–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00312.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burnett S. D., Woolf C. M., Yudkin J. S. Developing a district diabetic register. BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):627–630. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carney T., Helliwell C. Effect of structured postgraduate medical education on the care of patients with diabetes. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Mar;45(392):149–151. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chesover D., Tudor-Miles P., Hilton S. Survey and audit of diabetes care in general practice in south London. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Jul;41(348):282–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Di Cianni G., Benzi L., Giannarelli R., Orsini P., Villani G., Ciccarone A. M., Cecchetti P., Fedele O., Navalesi R. A prevalence study of known diabetes mellitus in Tuscany assessed from pharmaceutical prescriptions and other independent sources. Acta Diabetol. 1994 Jun;31(2):87–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00570541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dunn N. R., Bough P. Standards of care of diabetic patients in a typical English community. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jul;46(408):401–405. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fleming D. M. Diabetes registers in general practice. College reports higher prevalence. BMJ. 1994 Jan 8;308(6921):134–134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6921.134a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbins R. L., Saunders J. Characteristics and pattern of care of a diabetic population in mid-Wales. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 May;39(322):206–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goyder E. C., Jennings S., Botha J. L. Why don't all general practices offer structured diabetes care? A comparison of practices that do not with those that do. Public Health. 1996 Nov;110(6):357–360. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Higgs E. R., Kelleher A., Simpson H. C., Reckless J. P. Screening programme for microvascular complications and hypertension in a community diabetic population. Diabet Med. 1992 Jul;9(6):550–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1992.tb01837.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Malmgren R., Warlow C., Bamford J., Sandercock P. Geographical and secular trends in stroke incidence. Lancet. 1987 Nov 21;2(8569):1196–1200. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91331-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mather H. M., Keen H. The Southall Diabetes Survey: prevalence of known diabetes in Asians and Europeans. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Oct 19;291(6502):1081–1084. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6502.1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meadows P. Variation of diabetes mellitus prevalence in general practice and its relation to deprivation. Diabet Med. 1995 Aug;12(8):696–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meadows P. Variation of diabetes mellitus prevalence in general practice and its relation to deprivation. Diabet Med. 1995 Aug;12(8):696–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Neil H. A., Gatling W., Mather H. M., Thompson A. V., Thorogood M., Fowler G. H., Hill R. D., Mann J. I. The Oxford Community Diabetes Study: evidence for an increase in the prevalence of known diabetes in Great Britain. Diabet Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;4(6):539–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1987.tb00926.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ruwaard D., Hoogenveen R. T., Verkleij H., Kromhout D., Casparie A. F., van der Veen E. A. Forecasting the number of diabetic patients in The Netherlands in 2005. Am J Public Health. 1993 Jul;83(7):989–995. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.7.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simmons D., Williams D. R., Powell M. J. The Coventry Diabetes Study: prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in Europids and Asians. Q J Med. 1991 Dec;81(296):1021–1030. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/81.3.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Whitford D. L., Southern A. J., Braid E., Roberts S. H. Comprehensive diabetes care in North Tyneside. Diabet Med. 1995 Aug;12(8):691–695. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00571.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Williams D. R., Munroe C., Hospedales C. J., Greenwood R. H. A three-year evaluation of the quality of diabetes care in the Norwich community care scheme. Diabet Med. 1990 Jan;7(1):74–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1990.tb01312.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES