Abstract
Alveolar macrophages (AM) are pivotal immune sentinels, essential for maintaining tissue homeostasis and mediating immune responses to inhaled particles and pathogens. They demonstrate remarkable plasticity by transitioning from pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory/reparative (M2) phenotypes in response to local signals. Upon exposure to environmental agents, such as particulate matter, atypical respiratory pathogens opportunistic gram-negative bacteria, or respiratory viruses they undergo dynamic activation that profoundly influences their functional repertoire. Acute or chronic environmental/biological insults disrupt normal AM activities such as phagocytosis, efferocytosis, cytokine production, inciting oxidative stress, inflammasome activation, and in some cases, forms of programmed cell death such as pyroptosis. Although these responses are indispensable for eliminating noxious particles and pathogens, such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae or Klebsiella pneumoniae, Influenza A, or SARS-CoV-2, they can also derail the resolution phase by perpetuating inflammation, driving tissue remodeling and fibrosis, and thereby fueling chronic lung disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumoconiosis, and post-COVID interstitial lung disease. Moreover, environmental and microbial exposures modify AM by altering receptor repertoires, intracellular phenotype by signaling cascades, and crosstalk with epithelial and mesenchymal cells that collectively determine the disease trajectory. Elucidating how diverse environmental agents, together with pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2, shape AM biology is therefore pivotal for understanding the pathogenesis of COPD, pneumoconiosis, and progressive fibrotic lung disease, and COVID-19 related pulmonary sequelae. This review brings together the current insights into exposure-driven modulation of AM functions, highlighting recent advances and identifying knowledge gaps relevant for therapeutic targeting of exposure-induced and pathogen-mediated lung pathology.
Keywords: fibrosis, pro-inflammatory (M1) phenotype, anti-inflammatory/reparative (M2) phenotype, phagocytosis, COPD
Graphical Abstract:
Graphical illustration of the acute, resolution, and chronic phases of inflammation orchestrated by AM in response to environmental toxicants and pathogens (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Mycoplasma, Influenza, SARS-CoV-2). (A) Acute phase: Environmental toxicants (e.g., cigarette smoke, PM silica, asbestos, or pathogens are phagocytosed and by AM. They may also damage the lung cells by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS). SP-A and SP-D, complement protein C1q, C3b, and/or immunoglobins, opsonize toxic particles and enhance phagocytosis by being recognized by mannose (MR)/TLR2, compliment CCR1/CCR3, and FcR receptors respectively expressed on AM. M1 macrophages secrete an array of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which leads to the recruitment of other immune cells including neutrophils and BMDMs to the lung and exacerbate the inflammatory condition. (B) Resolution: Effective clearance of apoptotic or dead cells by AM through efferocytosis as well as secretion of IL-4 and IL-13 by ILC2 cells polarize the macrophages towards M2 state. M2 macrophages secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β and mark the resolution phase. (C) Chronic phase: Continuous inhalation of toxic particles (e.g., cigarette smoke, PM silica, asbestos, ozone, or mycoplasma) or defective efferocytosis leads to the secretion of various chemotactic factors by AM, which leads to accumulation of other inflammatory immune cells in the lung. CC-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) attracts monocytes via a number of receptors, which engage T helper (TH) cells and cytotoxic CD8 T cells. These cells release proteases including MMP9 and elastase, which leads to the elastin degradation, damage of the alveolar wall, and emphysema. Additionally, AM and epithelial cells releases TGF-β which induces proliferation and activation of fibroblast and myofibroblast resulting in tissue remodeling and fibrosis. Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com

Introduction
Inhaled particles, airborne pathogens, and pollutants constantly bombard the lungs, with their large surface area and constant interaction with the external environment. Lung immunity is orchestrated by both innate and adaptive immune cells that reside in or are recruited to the airways, interstitial, and alveolar spaces. To maintain effective gas exchange while defending against inhaled threats, the lungs maintain a dynamic array of immune cells, which cooperate to maintain homeostasis. These cells are responsible for immune surveillance, rapid defense against pathogens, and tolerance to harmless antigens.(1, 2) The tight regulation of these cellular networks is crucial for cellular function, and their disruptions can lead to infections, allergies, or chronic inflammatory diseases.(1) Acute lung injury (ALI) and its severe form, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), involve complex interactions of various immune and structural cells. Stimuli from both infectious (e.g., bacterial or viral pneumonia) and non-infectious (e.g., chemical exposure, mechanical ventilation) (3) agents trigger robust immune responses that can be either protective or damaging.
Among the initial responders to lung injury are the highly adaptable macrophages, which are the most numerous immune cells in the lungs. Their ability to detect, react, and adjust to a wide range of harmful stimuli makes them key contributors not only to defend the lungs from external particulate matter and pathogens, but also to initiate the repair. The ability of these cells to shift between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory roles is a key mediator in the aggravation and alleviation of lung injury.(4) Understanding their dual nature is crucial to unravel the complex pathogenesis of acute and chronic lung diseases.
Unlike traditional views that all macrophages derive from circulating monocytes, recent advances in fate-mapping and cellular lineage tracing have revealed that lung macrophages have diverse embryonic and postnatal origins, which influence their identity, maintenance, and function throughout life. In the healthy lung, there are two primary macrophage populations: alveolar macrophages (AM), which reside on the epithelial fluid layers, and interstitial macrophages (IM), located within the lung parenchyma.(5, 6) AM originate mainly from fetal monocytes that colonize the lungs during embryogenesis and then maintain their numbers through self-renewal, with little need for replenishment from bone marrow-derived cells. In steady-state conditions, these macrophages are the primary immune cells residing on the alveolar surface, where they perform specialized roles essential for maintaining lung homeostasis. In contrast, IM are embedded within the connective tissue of the lung parenchyma. They arise from a mixture of both embryonic precursors and adult blood monocytes. Nestled among structural and immune cells, IM guide tissue remodeling, temper immune reactions, and help preserve lung architecture. During inflammation or injury, circulating monocytes are rapidly recruited into the lungs by chemokine gradients, and differentiate into macrophages. These newly recruited macrophages augment the resident pool and support the immune response by aiding in pathogen elimination, tissue repair, and regulation of inflammation.(1, 7, 8) Recent advances have revealed a spectrum of macrophage subsets in the lungs, distinguished by their ontogeny and local niche. The lung, therefore, serves as a paradigm for understanding how tissue context endows macrophages with specialized identities.
The mammalian lungs are exposed to a million of particles and a plethora of reactive gases in daily life. Macrophages, strategically positioned at the air-tissue interface, clear debris, orchestrate immune responses, and maintain tolerance to innocuous antigens. Perturbation of macrophage homeostasis by environmental agents is increasingly recognized as a pivotal driver of chronic lung diseases such as COPD, asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, cancer, and others.(9–11) Understanding exposure-specific alterations in macrophages is crucial for gaining mechanistic insights, identifying biomarkers, and developing targeted therapies. Herein, we aim to discuss the origin, phenotypic diversity, and functional dynamics of AM, with a particular focus on how environmental/biological agents modulate their responses and contribute to pulmonary health and disease.
AM display remarkable phenotypic plasticity, allowing them to adjust rapidly to the dynamic lung microenvironment. They are the multitasking conductors of lung inflammation that exhibit extraordinary functional plasticity through complex networks of cytokines, pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs), and epigenetic modifications. Key functions include: (i) Particle recognition, (ii) Phagocytosis of opsonized pathogens and trafficking them into intracellular compartments for killing; (iii) Formation of extracellular traps (METs); (iv) Clearance of apoptotic cells by efferocytosis; (v) Release of reactive oxygen-nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), proteases, cytokines, and chemokines; (vi) Tissue repair and remodeling by phagocytosing pathogens, inhaled particles. Below, we discuss the main polarization pathways of AM, the key molecular signals that regulate these states, and the characteristic surface markers and functional traits that define each phenotype as well as metabolic shifts which play a crucial role in their maintenance of pro-inflammatory (M1) and tissue repair phenotypes (M2) (Table 1, Figure 1).
Table1.
Main categories of alveolar macrophages (AM) encountered in adult lungs, their origin and ontogeny, and their distinguishing molecular/functional traits.(8, 20, 80, 173, 659–668)
| Alveolar-Macrophage Type / Phenotype | Typical Inducer or Ontogeny | Core Surface Markers (human) | Signature Transcription Factors | Key Effector Molecules which are upregulated | Dominant Functions | Resulting Lung Injury |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homeostatic Resident AM (quiescent) | Prenatal yolk-sac & fetal-liver origin; GM-CSF & surfactant cues | CD11c/HIGH (Itgax+), MARCO, CD169, Siglec-8 (Siglecf+), MerTK, CD11b/LOW, Pparg+, Car4+, TRPV4 (LOW/constitutive) | PPARγ, KLF4, BACH2 | TGF-β (basal), GM-CSF, SP-A/D, cathepsins (low), C1qa/b/c+ | Surfactant turnover, debris clearance, immune surveillance | Healthy lung; immune silence to innocuous inhaled particles |
| Inflammatory “M1-like” AM | Classical PRR ligation (LPS, TLR2/4 agonists, silica, cigarette smoke, Mycoplasma lipoproteins) | CD80, CD86, MHC-II-HIGH, CD11b↑, TLR2/4, MARCO, CCR7, C5ar1+, Ear1+, TRPV4 (↑/activated) | NF-κβ, AP-1, IRF1, HIF-1α | TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL8, iNOS/NO, NOX2-ROS, caspase-1, Krat79, Mki67+, Top2a+ | ROS/RNS burst, pathogen killing, neutrophil recruitment | Acute infections (Mp, influenza), particulate exposure, early COPD exacerbation |
| Alternative “M2-like” AM | Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-13), IL-10, TGF-β, prolonged particle exposure, convalescent Mp infection | CD206 (MRC1), CD163, MerTK-HIGH, PD-L1, CCR2-LOW, Chil3+, Pf4+, TRPV4 (variable/linked to profibrotic signaling) | STAT6, STAT3, PPARγ, SMAD2/3 | Arginase-1, IL-10, TGF-β, MMP-9/12, PDGF, VEGF, Chil3 (YM1) | Wound healing, collagen synthesis, phagocytosis of apoptotic cells | Allergic asthma, fibrosis (silicosis, asbestosis), late Mp pneumonia |
| Regulatory / IL-10 AM (Mreg) | Chronic low-grade bacterial ligands, apoptotic-cell uptake, glucocorticoids | CD11c, CD14, IL-10R, MerTK, low CD80/CD86, C1qa/b/c+, SinglecF+, TRPV(LOW/regulated) | STAT3, CREB | IL-10, IL-1Ra, PGE2 | Resolution of inflammation, T-cell suppression | Post-viral or post-Mp convalescence; corticosteroid therapy |
| Monocyte-Derived AM (Mo-AM) | Recruitment of classical monocytes (CCR2+) during injury or infection | CD11b/HIGH, CD14, Lysozyme, CCR2+, Ly6c2+, Ly6C+, low Siglec-8 (Siglecf variable), Ccr2+, TRPV4 (HIGH/functional) | IRF8, RUNX1 | Pro-IL-1β, TNF-α, cathepsin B/L, MMP-8, Ear1+, Pf4+, Mki67+, Top2a+ | First-wave defense, debris removal; can replace resident AM niche | ARDS, severe pneumonia, smoke-induced lung injury |
| Senescent / Aged AM | Aging, chronic oxidative stress (smoke, PM2.5) | CD11cLOW, SA-β-gal+, reduced Siglec-8, SinglecF variable, TRPV4(dysregulated) | FOXO3, p53, decreased NRF2 | SASP factors: IL-6, CCL2, MMP-3 | Low phagocytosis, high inflammatory “noise” | Age-related decline, susceptibility to infection, emphysema |
| Foam-Cell / Lipid-laden AM | Surfactant overload, e-cigarette, alveolar proteinosis | CD11c, ADRP, TREM2, CD36, PLIN2, TRPV4(variable; may affect lipid handling) | LXR-α, SREBP-1c | Cholesteryl-esters, oxidized lipids, GM-CSFLOW | Lipid storage, impaired surfactant clearance | Exogenous lipoid pneumonia, smoke-associated lung injury |
| Trained-Immunity (Epigenetically Scared) AM | Prior smoke/PM exposure or Mp infection; persistent β-glucan | CD11c, MARCO, epigenetic markers (H3K4me3 at TNF/IL6), Krat79, TRPV4(sensitized) | RelA (accessible), loss of HDAC2 | TNF-α, IL-6 (heightened on restimulation), Mki67+, Top2a+ | Exaggerated secondary responses, steroid resistance | Former smokers, recurrent Mp-associated wheeze, rapid-decline COPD |
| Hemosiderin-Laden Macrophages | Alveolar hemorrhage, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (e.g. Goodpasture’s) | CD68, CD163, Prussian blue+ iron deposits, TRPV4 (variable) | NRF2, HO-1 | Ferritin, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), iron-binding proteins | RBC phagocytosis, iron recycling, antioxidant defense | Pulmonary hemorrhage syndromes, idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis |
| Multinucleated Giant Cells | Chronic granulomatous stimuli (TB, sarcoidosis, foreign bodies—silica/coal dust) | CD68+, CD11b, MHC-II, DC-SIGN, TRPV4(present in fused macrophages) | NFATc1, STAT6, NF-κβ | IFN-γ–inducible genes, TNF-α, MMP-9 | Granuloma formation, walling-off pathogens/particles | Sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, silicosis, coal-workers’ pneumoconiosis |
Figure 1: Graphical representation of molecular and cellular pathways involved in macrophage activation and polarization in response to environmental exposure.

(A) Homeostasis: tissue resident alveolar macrophages (TR-AM) in healthy lung interact with alveolar epithelial cells (AEC) (ATI and ATII) via CD200R-CD200 receptors. Secretion of granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) by AEC, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) by TR-AM and inhibitory signal via CD200R-CD200 orchestrate the immunosuppressive activity of the macrophages. AM maintain their population by self-renewal capabilities and expressing proliferation markers Mki67 and Top2a. During homeostasis TR-AM, rely on oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for their metabolic needs. (B) M1 polarization: Environmental toxicants generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that triggers the release of damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in the extracellular and intracellular environments. DAMPs activate pattern recognition receptors such as TLR (toll like receptors), NLRP3 inflammasome, and cGAS-STING pathways to stimulate macrophages and the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, which recruit neutrophils, and bone marrow derived macrophages to the lungs. Cytokines/chemokines further stimulate macrophages via interleukin and TNF receptors. Infiltrated macrophages also secrete pro-inflammatory mediators, thus establishing a feed forward loop of inflammation. M1 macrophages mainly utilize glycolysis for their energy demands. (C) M2 Polarization: Chronic exposure to environmental toxicants promotes increased levels of IL-13 and IL-4 secreted by T-helper type (Th2). These inhibitory cytokines activate lung macrophages via IL-13R1α and IL-4Rα receptors and skew them towards M2 polarization. M2 macrophages regulate inflammation by enhancing expression of anti-inflammatory molecules including CD200R and TREM2 and secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL-10 and TGF-β. αvβ6 integrin expressed on inflamed AEC type I cells bind to TGFβR expressed on AM and inhibit inflammation.(145, 676) Chronic M2 activation of macrophages and dysregulated TGF- β signaling causes proliferation and activation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, which results in fibrosis. Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
Stages of Alveolar Macrophage Activations
Classically Activated AM (M1 Macrophages)
In the absence of external stimuli, AM exist in an immune-quiescent, “tolerogenic” phenotype that protects the delicate gas-exchange surface from any undue inflammation. However, upon exposure to potent stimuli, such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide, viral components, and Th1 cytokines like interferon- γ (IFN- γ) and others, AM are rapidly reprogrammed into the classically activated or M1 state.(12, 13) This activation does not represent a fixed state but rather a signal-dependent activation program, that optimizes the cell for rapid, aggressive innate immune responses, aimed at pathogen clearance. The shift toward M1 is marked by changes in gene expression, surface receptor expression, and cellular behavior that together prioritize inflammation and antimicrobial activity over tissue repair.(8, 12, 14)
On a molecular level, classical activation is driven by signaling pathways initiated by cytokine receptors and pattern-recognition receptors. Exposure to a variety of external stimuli result in the release of Damage Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs), which activate pattern recognition receptors such as toll-like receptors (TLR), NLRP3 inflammasome, and cGAS-STING pathways to stimulate macrophages and release of pro-inflammatory mediators (cytokine/chemokines). Chemokines recruit other immune cells including neutrophils and bone marrow-derived macrophages. Cytokines further stimulate macrophages via interleukin receptors and TNF receptors.(15–19) (Figure 1)
Infiltrated macrophages also secrete proinflammatory mediators, thus establishing a feed forward loop of inflammation. This is further exacerbated by growth factors, notably granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF),(20) which engage their respective receptors and signal through JAK2 to enhance macrophage survival and differentiation. Converging signals from pattern-recognition (PRRs) and cytokine receptors activates three principal signaling cascades, JAK/STAT, NF-κβ, and IRF. All three cooperate at the chromatin level to drive a robust transcriptional program encoding iNOS, NADPH oxidase, and inflammatory chemokines and cytokines.(21) (Figure 2)
Figure 2: Generation of Superoxide (·O2−), Nitric Oxide (NO·) and peroxynitrite (ONOO−) by AM:

(A) NADPH oxidase generates superoxide and nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) produces NO by metabolizing L-arginine. ·O2− is also generated through an electron transport chain in mitochondria. ·O2− and NO· combine to form the highly reactive ONOO−. ·O2− is converted into hydrogen peroxide, which reacts with chlorine (Cl−) to form hypochlorous acid. NO· diffuses through cell membranes while ·O2− and ONOO− can cross through anion channels. NO· and ONOO− inhibit Na+ (ENAC) and Cl− (CFTR) channels on epithelial cells.(677–680) NO· and ONOO− reduce the pathogen load ONOO− causes lipid peroxidation and damage surfactant components in the alveolar space and also increases permeability of the blood-gas barrier.(434, 681–683) (B) Immunostaining of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in human AM from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) shows increased expression of iNOS at day 7 of ARDS pathogenesis. Panel B was reprinted from Sittipunt C, et al with permission.(684) Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
The JAK/STAT axis is initiated when binding of its heterodimeric receptor (IFN-γR1/IFN-γR2), bringing receptor-associated JAK1 and JAK2 into proximity and facilitating their trans-phosphorylation.(22, 23) Activated JAKs phosphorylate STAT1, prompting STAT1 dimerization and nuclear translocation. In the nucleus, STAT1 dimers bind to gamma-activated sequence (GAS) elements in promoters and enhancers of target genes such as Nos2 (iNOS), and TNF.(24, 25) STAT1 also induces the transcription factor IRF1, creating a feed-forward loop that maintains high STAT1 activity and further amplifies inflammatory gene expression.(26–29)
Simultaneously, engagement of TLR4 by Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or TNFR1 and IL-1R1 signaling via autocrine TNF-α and IL-1β activates the MyD88/IRAK4/IRAK1–TAK1 cascade, culminating in IKKβ-mediated liberation of the NF-κβ p65/p50 heterodimer.(25, 30, 31) NF-κβ then drives expression of Il1b, Il6, TNF-α, Nos2, and NADPH-oxidase subunits, thereby fueling inflammatory gene transcription.
Activation of TLR3 and the TLR4–TRIF axis recruits TRAF3, activating TBK1 and IKKε, which phosphorylates IRF3 and IRF7, inducing their dimerization and nuclear translocation, initiating IFN-β transcription.(32–34) The secreted IFN-β then binds the type I interferon receptor (IFNAR1/2), triggering JAK1 and TYK2 to phosphorylate STAT1/STAT2, which together with IRF9 form the ISGF3 complex that binds interferon-stimulated response elements (ISREs) in promoters of Nos2 and NADPH oxidase. Meanwhile, IRF5, induced by both STAT1 and NF-κβ, binds to distinct promoter motifs in cytokine genes (e.g., Il12, Il6), thereby reinforcing the M1 phenotype. Cooperation among STAT1, NF-κβ, IRF1/5, and AP-1 (activated via MAPKs p38, JNK, ERK) assembles super-enhancers at key loci, recruit’s chromatin remodelers, and drives burst transcription of iNOS, and inflammatory cytokines.(33, 35–39)
In addition, mitochondrial or nuclear DNA released from stressed cells activates cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), which generates cGAMP to engage the ER-resident adaptor STING.(40–42) STING couples to TBK1 for IRF3 phosphorylation and to IKK for additional NF-κβ activation, synergizing with surface TLR signals to solidify the M1 transcriptome and promote production of CXCL9/CXCL10.(43, 44) Simultaneously, extracellular ATP and UTP released from injured epithelial cells bind to the purinergic receptors, triggering potassium (K+) efflux, mitochondrial ROS generation (Figure 3), and lysosomal disruption, which are the classic cues for assembling the NLRP3 inflammasome. NF-κβ–mediated “priming” supplies the pro-IL-1β and NLRP3 protein, while the P2X7/ROS axis provides the “activation” signal; together they allow the NLRP3-ASC-caspase-1 complex to mature IL-1β and IL-18 and to cleave gasdermin D, driving pyroptosis.(45–49) The released cytokines feedback on AM and neighboring leukocytes, intensifying STAT1 and NF-κβ activity and locking the AM in the M1 state.
Figure 3: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and their effect on AM activation during exposure of lungs to environmental toxicants and pathogens:

(A) Environmental toxicants such as particulate matter, silica, asbestos, and pathogens are phagocytosed by AM, leading to autophagolysosomal formation and generation of cytosolic ROS. Ozone and other environmental agents cause epithelial cell damage by oxidation of phospholipids (OxPL) and lipid peroxidation of the components of surfactants (LPP). These active byproducts cause the production of DAMPs, which lead to the activation of AM. (B) Cytosolic ROS also produced through NOX (NADPH oxidase) activate macrophages via NF-Kβ and HIF-1α pathways towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype and enhances glycolytic pathways. Cellular stress and altered activity of enzymes including electron transport chain (ETC) trigger the generation of mitochondrial ROS (mtROS). mtROS damages mitochondrial DNA which forms DAMPs that activate the NLRP3 inflammasome leading to the further activation of the macrophages.(685) Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
Metabolically, these signaling events trigger a shift toward aerobic glycolysis, which supplies rapid ATP and biosynthetic intermediates while generating lactate. This metabolic reprogramming also enhances production of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS); NADPH derived from the oxidative state of the pentose phosphate pathway fuels the NOX2 complex to generate superoxide, while iNOS converts L-arginine to nitric oxide. Superoxide and NO combine to form peroxynitrite, a potent microbicidal molecule, and elevated ROS can oxidize phosphatase cysteines to prolong kinase signaling, creating feed-forward amplification loops.(14, 50)
Phenotypically, M1 polarized AM secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-23) and chemokines (CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL9-11) that recruit neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, and eosinophils, which propel a Th1-dominated immune response.(51) M1 polarized AM are responsible for the rapid pathogen clearance during early lung infections (bacterial and viral), efficient antigen presentation, and orchestration of innate and adaptive immune responses. However, sustained or dysregulated M1 polarization often driven by chronic exposure to microbial products, or endogenous danger signals can lead to persistent inflammation and tissue injury.(12, 52–54) Thus, anti-inflammatory cytokines, inhibitory receptors,(55–58) and metabolic feedback help to switch/reprogram M1 AM to the M2 state.
Alternatively Activated AM (M2 Macrophages)
M2 AM represent an alternatively activated state dedicated to dampening inflammation and promoting tissue repair in the lungs. This phenotype is primarily induced by Th2-type cytokines, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-13 (IL-13), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and TGFβ, which trigger the STAT6 transcriptional pathway after binding to the shared IL-4Rα receptor(20, 59–62) (Figure 1). M2-AM contain a distinctive constellation of markers, including arginase-1 (Arg1), scavenger receptor-A, CCR2, and others which help them suppress the inflammatory responses and regulate the immune balance.(63)
When macrophages adopt the M2 phenotype, they switch from glycolysis to fatty-acid oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation to generate the energy and biosynthetic building blocks essential for tissue repair. (Figure 1) Additionally, anti-inflammatory signals such as IL-10, TGF-β, and glucocorticoids reinforce M2 by creating specialized functional subtypes (M2a, M2b, M2c and M2d) that help resolve distinct aspects of inflammation and promote tissue remodeling.(63–66) All four M2 subtypes share common hallmark features, such as high Arg1 activity, enhanced scavenger-receptor expression, and dampened production of classical pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, each M2 subtype is induced by a unique set of signals. IL-4 and IL-13 primarily induce M2a; immune complexes together with TLR ligation produce M2b; prolonged exposure to IL-10, TGF-β, glucocorticoids, or uptake of apoptotic cells gives rise to M2c; and adenosine, IL-6, hypoxia, or tumor-derived factors result in the formation of the M2d phenotype. These upstream signals sculpt distinct transcriptional profiles, surface-marker repertoires (e.g., CD206 high in M2a, CD163 high in M2c) and metabolic settings, giving each subtype a specialized toolkit for dealing with different stages of tissue injury.(59, 67, 68)
Functionally, M2a macrophages are the archetypal “wound-healing” cells. They secrete pro-fibrotic mediators such as fibronectin, insulin-like growth factor-1, and TGF-β, which up-regulate enzymes that remodel the lung extracellular matrix. M2b AM, by contrast, occupy a hybrid regulatory niche, releasing both IL-10 and moderate amounts of TNF-α and IL-6, which allow them to fine-tune lingering inflammation, while still providing antimicrobial support. M2c AM express high levels of MerTK and CD163, engulf apoptotic cells, and secrete IL-10 and TGF-β, which terminate effector T-cell responses.(12, 51, 59, 66, 67, 69–71) M2d cells express abundant vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9), thereby fostering neovascularization that supplies oxygen to regenerating tissue (Figure 1).
Recognizing the specific signals that generate each subtype provides valuable therapeutic entry points: augmenting M2a and M2c responses accelerate wound healing or temper autoimmunity, whereas selectively inhibiting M2d polarization is a growing strategy for t cancer immunotherapies, which enhance T-cell responses.(12, 51, 59, 67, 69, 70, 72, 73) Metabolically, M2 AM rely mainly on fatty-acid oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation, a shift supported by PGC-1β-induced mitochondrial biogenesis.(74, 75) (Figure 4) This profile differs sharply from the glycolysis-driven, ROS-producing metabolic characteristic of classically activated M1 AM. M1 responses depend on the rapid and transient transcription regulated by NF-κβ and STAT1, whereas M2 AM responses develop more gradually but persist longer, an adaptation that fits with the lung’s need for ongoing repair and remodeling once pathogens have been eliminated. Therefore, achieving the proper timing and balance between M1 and M2 states is crucial for maintaining homeostasis. M2-polarized AM drive the resolution phase of inflammation and rebuild tissue architecture after injury or infection. Their proficiency in efferocytosis, swiftly removing apoptotic neutrophils and cellular debris, prevents the secondary release of harmful intracellular contents and supports orderly healing. (13, 76–79)
Figure 4: Metabolic rewiring of macrophage activation and function:

(A) AM in a homoeostatic state mainly depends upon oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for their metabolic needs. (B) Following exposure of AM to DAMPs or PAMPS, the majority of their pyruvate is converted into lactate. As a result, the TCA cycle is inhibited which leads to the accumulation of citrate and succinate. Citrate facilitates fatty acids synthesis (FAS) and succinate promotes stabilization of HIF-1α; both then enter the nucleus and stimulate the expression of glycolytic genes and proinflammatory mediators. This also leads to decreased OXPHOS and increased ROS generation, which drives AM toward the M1 pro-inflammatory phenotype. Enhanced pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) results into increased NADPH leading to the nitric oxide (NO·) production, which further inhibits OXPHOS. (C) Following stimulation by IL-4 and IL-13, AM pyruvate is converted into acetyl-CoA and enters the TCA cycle, which results in increased OXPHOS. Enhanced fatty acid oxidation (FAO) also upregulate OXPHOS leading to increased arginase1 (ARG1) and nuclear translocation of PPARγ/STAT6 which promotes tissue repair.(687, 688) Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
In the acute and resolving stages of pneumonia, ARDS, and asthma, M2 activation accelerates healing and restores effective gas exchange. Conversely, excessive or chronic M2 skewing may lead to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or post-viral interstitial lung disease, by stimulating excessive fibroblast activity and collagen deposition.(80) (Figure 5) Therefore, tight regulation of M2 AM polarization is critical for achieving a balance between effective repair and the prevention of maladaptive scarring in the lung. Under normal circumstances, once the initial injurious stimulus is cleared, a series of built-in “brakes” engage to prevent M2 cells from driving unchecked fibrosis. These include intracellular signaling inhibitors such as suppressor of cytokine signaling proteins (SOCS1 and SOCS3) and protein tyrosine phosphatases (e.g., SHP-1), which attenuate IL-4/IL-13 receptor-STAT6 activation.
Figure 5: Mechanism of macrophage activation and function in tissue repair and regeneration:

IL-4 and IL-13 released from innate lymphoid cells type II (ILC2) and helper T cells (Th1) activates both BMDM and resident AM into a regulatory and pro-resolving phenotype, which clear the apoptotic cells by efferocytosis. AM secrete AREG, PDGF, TGF-α, Plet1, and VEGF-α which promote repair and regeneration of epithelial and endothelial cells and reconstitution of the blood-gas barrier. In the later phase of repair, BMDM and resident AM acquire regulatory phenotype, self-proliferation, and maintain the normal tissue architecture and homeostasis. Chronic activation of M2-like macrophages causes activation and proliferation of fibroblasts and myofibroblast via TGF-β signaling leading to the deposition of an extracellular matrix (ECM) and fibrosis. TGF-β stimulates recruitment of the TRPV4 complex from the cytoplasm to the membrane of fibroblast which leads to the increased Ca2+ influx and promotes myofibroblast trans-differentiation.(668) Amphiregulin (AREG), Arginase-1 (Arg1), interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), placenta-expressed transcript 1 (Plet1) Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 (TRPV4).(688) Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
Likewise, nuclear factors such as PPARγ and BACH1 compete with pro-fibrotic transcriptional programs, modulating excessive collagen and growth-factor production.(81–83) At the post-transcriptional level, specific microRNAs (e.g., miR-155, miR-21, and miR-34a) dampen M2-associated transcripts or promote the expression of negative regulators, effectively shortening the half-life of profibrotic mRNAs and resetting M2 cells toward homeostasis.(31, 84, 85) Metabolically, a switch away from fatty-acid oxidation, driven by AMPK activation or shifts in NAD+/NADH ratios, limit the bioenergetic support that M2 macrophages require for persistent matrix remodeling. Pro-resolving lipid mediators (such as resolvins, lipoxins, protectins), produced by neutrophils and platelets, restore phagocytic clearance functions and bind to specific G-protein coupled receptors on M2 macrophages, triggering apoptosis or re-polarization back toward a quiescent phenotype.(86–89)
Finally, crosstalk with neighboring cells provides another important layer of control. Alveolar type II (ATII) epithelial cells secrete GM-CSF and surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D that favor balanced macrophage activation; regulatory T cells supply IL-10 or TGF-β to dampen but not abolish repair functions. Mechanical cues, such as increasing tissue stiffness during late-phase repair, feedback through integrin, and focal-adhesion kinase pathways further curtail M2-driven fibrosis. Together, these intersecting checkpoints ensure that once damage is mended, AM return to surveillance mode rather than perpetuating a pro-fibrotic cycle.(14, 67, 90–93)
M3 or Regulatory Alveolar Macrophages (Mres)
As stated above, macrophage polarization is traditionally recognized as consisting of M1, classically activated, pro-inflammatory, and M2, alternatively activated, reparative. However, accumulating evidence reveals an additional, functionally distinct population that emerges as inflammation subsides, commonly termed M3 or Mres.(94, 95) These AM represent a specialized activation state that emerges once the initial microbial or inflammatory insult are cleared. Metabolically, M3 macrophages favor high-efficiency fatty-acid oxidation and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, sustained by AMPK-driven autophagy(96) and PGC-1β–mediated mitochondrial biogenesis,(97) generating ample NADPH for redox balance, without the ROS burst characteristic of M1 cells.
Functionally, M3 macrophages serve as the “off-switch” for inflammation and are the first architects of tissue restoration. However, they are molecularly distinct from conventional M2 AM. M3 AM contain Tim-4, MerTK, Stabilin-2, and CD36, four receptors that together endow them with superior efferocytosis, while they express little or no CD206 (mannose receptor), CD209, or CD301 that are present in M2a/b macrophages.(94, 98–101)Transcriptome analyses show the dominance of resolution-linked transcription factors, LXRα/β, NR4A1 (Nur77), ATF3, and KLF2; whereas the IL-4/IL-13-driven STAT6-IRF4 axis that defines M2 polarization is markedly muted.(102–107) This unique wiring drives a metabolic profile rich in cholesterol efflux genes (ABCA1, ABCG1) and oxidative phosphorylation enzymes, contrasting with the fatty-acid oxidation bias of classic M2 cells.(108–110)
These events translate into a specialized functional portfolio. By clustering Tim-4, MerTK, and Stabilin-2 at the membrane, M3 macrophages execute rapid, high-capacity efferocytosis, preventing secondary necrosis and the spill-over of DAMPs that would otherwise reignite inflammation.(69, 111, 112) M3 secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and low-dose TGF-β) together with growth factors such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and amphiregulin that favor epithelial and endothelial repair over fibroblast activation. M3 AM cells are also the dominant producers of specialized pro-resolving mediators, resolvin-D1, maresin-1, protectin-D1.(113, 114) However, whether pro-resolvins exist in significant concentrations in vivo to enhance repair is currently in dispute.(115) Pro-resolvins collectively inhibit further neutrophil recruitment, promote epithelial and endothelial repair, and helps restore normal surfactant turnover and fluid homeostasis.(87, 116, 117)
In clinical settings, the timely appearance of M3 macrophages following pneumonia, ARDS, or ventilator-induced injury is associated with faster recovery of gas exchange and a lower risk of maladaptive scarring. Failure to switch from M1/M2 intermediates to the M3 state leaves the lungs caught in a smoldering inflammatory loop, or, conversely, diverts repair into a rigid, fibrotic pathway dominated by unchecked M2-like activity. Thus, the combination of distinctive surface markers (Tim-4high / CD206low), transcription factors (LXRα/β-NR4A1 vs. STAT6-IRF4), and effectors (SPMs and amphiregulin) provides a clear molecular signature that separates M3 macrophages from the broader M2 family.(118–126)
Summary: An Integrated View of AM Polarization
Alveolar macrophage polarization spans a tightly regulated spectrum: pro-inflammatory, pathogen-clearing M1, tissue-remodeling and anti-inflammatory M2 subtypes, resolution-focused, efferocytosis-enhanced M3 AM. The timing, magnitude, and molecular character of each state are crucial for maintaining alveolar integrity and health. Premature or excessive M1/M2 activity can prolong injury or promote fibrosis, while failure to transition to M3 delays resolution and risks persistent dysfunction. Thus, it is vital to delineate the transcriptional, metabolic, and signaling mechanisms that regulate the AK states in order to discover new therapies that improve pathogen clearance, support repair, and promote healthy resolution while preserving lung structure,
Efferocytosis and LC3-Associated Phagocytosis (LAP) are Critical AM Functions
Efferocytosis, is essential for clearing apoptotic cells, thereby preventing secondary necrosis and promoting the resolution of inflammation.(127) (Figure 6) Alongside canonical phagocytosis and LAP, efferocytosis depends on proper phagosomal maturation and signaling. Apoptotic cells express phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) or “eat me signal” on their surface that are recognized by receptors such as MerTK, TIM4, CD36, and CD300b present on AM.(128–130) PtdSer is also recognized by GAS6 and facilitates the recognition by MerTK or AXL.(131, 132) Complement proteins such as C1q and C3b are also expressed on apoptotic cells and recognized by complement receptors, including CR1 and CR3, (expressed on AM), phosphatidylserine (PtdSer), T cell immunoglobulin, and mucin domain-containing molecule 4 (TIM4).(133, 134) Efficient efferocytosis keeps the airspaces free of cellular debris, prevents secondary necrosis and limits pro-inflammatory danger signals that would otherwise damage the blood-gas barrier and pulmonary surfactant.(135) Decreased efferocytosis is linked to unresolved inflammation, susceptibility to secondary infections and fibrotic remodeling.
Figure 6: Receptors and ligands mediated mechanism of apoptotic cell recognition and efferocytosis by AM:

Apoptotic cells express phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) or “eat me signal” on their surface, which are recognized by AM receptors such as MerTK. TIM4, CD36, and CD300b. Recognition of GAS6 enhances attachment to MerTK or AXL. Apoptotic cells also express the complement components C1q and C3b, which are recognized by the complement receptors CCR1 and CCR3 expressed on AM. Mucin domain-containing molecule 4 (TIM4) also recognizes PtdSer. Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
Recent work shows that efferocytosis in AM is often coupled to a specialized form of phagocytosis, named LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), that plays a critical role in the resolution of inflammation by facilitating the rapid, non-inflammatory clearance of bacteria, dead cells, and debris.(136, 137) (Figure 7) Once apoptotic cells are phagocytosed, NADPH oxidase (NOX2) generates ROS that recruit a Rubicon-Beclin-1-Vps34 lipid-kinase complex to the single-membrane phagosome. Autophagy-related proteins Atg5, Atg7, and Atg3 then lipidate LC3 onto the phagosomal membrane. LC3 decoration accelerates fusion with lysosomes, enhances acidification and speeds degradation of the apoptotic cargo.(138, 139)
Figure 7: LC3-mediated phagocytosis (LAP), Phagocytosis, and LC3-associated endocytosis (LANDO) of particles and pathogens by AM.

(A) AM initiate LAP by recognizing pathogens, opsonized particles, and dead cells via surface receptors TLR, Dectin-1, MR, and FcγR. Receptor engagement leads to a signaling cascade including recruitment of NADP oxidase (NOX2) to the phagosome, stabilized by Rubicon and PI3K complexes that includes Beclin1, VSP15, VSP34, and UVRAG. ROS produced by NOX2 and PI3K complex recruit downstream LC3 conjugation machinery including ATG12, ATG16, ATG 5 to the phagosome. Lapidated LC3-II decorated on single-membrane LAPosome, which fuses with lysosomes for the degradation of phagocytosed cargo. LAPosome-mediated phagocytosis enhances degradation and inhibits inflammation.(689, 690) (B) LC3-negative phagocytosis, which is devoid of LAPsome formation, reduces the efficiency of phagosome and lysosomal fusion and degradation of phagocytosed cargo thus promoting inflammatory responses. (C) LC3 associated endocytosis of protein aggregates including surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A, SP-D) is required for clearance and receptor recycling. This process restricts inflammation.(689) (D) Graphical illustration showing receptor engagement with various ligands present on opsonized particles. Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
In parallel, LAP alters the cytokine output of AM towards anti-inflammatory mediators (IL-10, TGF-β) and specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators, reinforcing a tissue-protective M2-like polarization program. Efficient LAP promotes antigen degradation and production of anti-inflammatory mediators, whereas defective LAP delays cellular clearance, prolongs NF-κβ and type I IFN signaling, and shifts AM toward an M1-like inflammatory state. In murine models this defect aggravates acute lung injury and remodeling, promotes autoantibody generation, and facilitates bacterial superinfection, whereas pharmacologic enhancement of LAP (e.g., PPARγ agonists, surfactant replacement) improves resolution.(137, 140–143)
Notably, the different polarization state of AM dictates the efferocytic process: anti-inflammatory M2-like AM are the most adept at both efferocytosis and LAP engagement, whereas M1- AM exhibit diminished efficiency, and the less-defined “M3” subset has not been shown to surpass M2 cells in these functions. Taken together, the LAP-efferocytosis axis is central to AM homeostasis and represents a therapeutic target to dampen injurious inflammation without compromising antimicrobial defense.
Metabolic Reprogramming
One of the defining features of AM is their ability to redistribute nutrient use and energy production in response to environmental or infectious cues. AM exist in a lipid-rich, relatively nutrient-poor milieu dominated by pulmonary surfactant. GM-CSF and TGF-β signaling induce transcription factors like PPARγ and LXR, which in turn switch on the genes that regulate fatty-acid uptake, β-oxidation, and cholesterol efflux.(144–146) Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and mitochondrial fatty-acid oxidation (FAO) fuel the “resting” AM, and support longer, self-renewal and non-inflammatory clearance of surfactant lipids and apoptotic cells.(62, 147) (Figure 4) Any disruption in this lipid-catabolic program (as classically seen in GM-CSF or PPARγ-deficient mice), causes surfactant accumulation and pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, underscoring the essentiality of proper metabolism for AM homeostasis.(147, 148) Upon sensing pathogens or danger signals, AM undergo a rapid metabolic switch that parallels classical (M1) activation. PRRs, pro-inflammatory cytokines or hypoxia stabilize HIF-1α, suppress FAO, and drive a rapid increase in aerobic glycolysis.(149, 150)
Through glycolytic reprogramming cells generate Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) independent of oxygen and divert glucose-6-phosphate into the pentose-phosphate pathway. This generates NADPH for NOX2-driven ROS, and accumulates the TCA intermediates, which further stabilizes HIF-1α and augments IL-1β production.(151–153) (Figure 4) Simultaneously, inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS)-derived NO inhibits electron-transport chain (complex IV), forcing the cells to rely on glycolysis.(153) This M1-like metabolic shift enhances the ability of AM to kill pathogens; however, prolonged glycolysis can itself promotes tissue damage.
During the resolution of inflammation, AM undergo a second metabolic shift or a reversal of the inflammatory switch. STAT6 and PGC-1β promote mitochondrial biogenesis and activation of FAO enzymes. In contrast, arginase-1, collectively restores OXPHOS and promotes an M2-like, pro-resolving phenotype that clears debris and secretes tissue-repair mediators.(76, 154, 155) Thus, metabolic reprogramming in AM is not merely a consequence of activation but also a determinant of their functional spectrum that moves from immune surveillance to inflammation and repair.
Cross-Talk between Neutrophils and AM in Lung Inflammation and Chronic Diseases
Injurious agents cause an influx of neutrophils, monocytes, and other immune cells, together with high concentrations of cytokines and chemokines. Neutrophils arrive within 12-18 h and release potent effector molecules [e.g., ROS, neutrophil elastase, myeloperoxidase (MPO), and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)], that kill pathogens but also injure epithelial cells, components of surfactants, and the extracellular matrix.(156–158) ROS and proteases modify AM surface receptors and signaling pathways. For example, nitration or proteolytic cleavage of MerTK or CD36 impairs efferocytosis and phagolysosomal function and transform AM toward a more proinflammatory, glycolytic phenotype. Simultaneous exposure to IL-1β, TNF-α, and CXCL8 further amplifies the AM activation and chemokine production by creating a feed-forward loop that sustains neutrophil recruitment and tissue-damaging inflammation.(156, 159–163)
Direct interactions between neutrophils and AM influence both the onset and pathogenesis of chronic lung diseases. Impaired removal of apoptotic neutrophils, especially under high neutrophil burden or when apoptotic cells progress to secondary necrosis, results in sustained release of DAMPs that activate alveolar macrophage inflammasomes (e.g., NLRP3) and drive IL-1β production.(164–167) NETs and proteases generate matrix fragments that act as danger signals, driving macrophage secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and profibrotic mediators. Over time, this dysregulated cross-talk promotes protease–antiprotease imbalance, collagen degradation, and aberrant repair responses.(168–170) In COPD, recurrent neutrophil-mediated injury and AM dysfunction contribute to the emphysematous destruction and impaired host defense; in addition persistent neutrophil–macrophage signaling favors TGF-β activation, fibroblast recruitment, and deposition of the extracellular matrix leading to fibrosis.(93, 119, 171, 172)
Elucidating the specific cellular and molecular interactions between neutrophils and AM in inflamed lungs is crucial for therapeutic interventions. Targeting neutrophil-derived mediators or restoring AM function could decrease the vicious cycle of inflammation and tissue damage that results in the pathogenesis of chronic pulmonary disease.(173–176) Approaches that protect AM efferocytosis or regulate their metabolic programming toward resolution may reduce lung injury while maintaining the host defenses. Moreover, additional insight into how Neutrophil-AM interactions differ across different disease stages, could enhance the timing and specificity of treatments designed to stop or reverse pathological remodeling in COPD and fibrosis.(173, 177) Therefore, developing insights into the AM-neutrophil interplay is crucial for developing comprehensive strategies to manage and treat inflammatory lung diseases.
Impact of Environmental Agents and Food Particles on AM Polarization and Function
Upon encountering environmental agents, AM initiate an immune response by producing cytokines and chemokines, recruiting additional immune cells to the injury site, and increasing pathogen clearance. AM capacity to adapt and respond effectively is essential for preventing infections, limiting inflammation, and preserving normal lung function. Environmental agents include a wide range of substances that can either directly injure epithelial cells or activate AM, leading to inflammation and tissue remodeling. Some of these environmental agents, food particles, and their impact on macrophage phenotype and function (Table 2A and 2B) are discussed below.
Table 2A.
Phenotypic and molecular markers that characterize alveolar macrophages (AM) in three settings: (i) physiologic homeostasis, (ii) exposure to non-infectious environmental agents (e.g. Ozone, cigarette smoke, PM2.5, coal, silica, asbestos) and (iii) infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Klebsiella pneumoniae. For the two exposure conditions, the table distinguishes the early “M1-like” pro-inflammatory phase from the later “M2-skewed” or reparative phase that often follows prolonged or repeated stimulation.(53, 146, 178, 195, 215, 254, 257, 297, 407, 566, 568, 583, 660, 669–672)
| ALVEOLAR-MACROPHAGE Marker Matrix | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-exposed | Environmental Agents | Mycoplasma pneumoniae | Klebsiella pneumoniae | |||||
| Category | Homeostatic / Quiescent | Early M1 burst | Chronic / Late M2 drift | Coal-Dust Exposure | Acute M1 burs | Late M2 / Regulatory | Acute M1 Burst | Late M2 / Regulatory |
| Surface / phenotypic markers | CD11c^high, Siglec–8, CD169, MerTK; low CD11b, MHC-II | ↑CD80, CD86, MHC-II; ↑TLR2/4, MARCO; ↑CD11b, ↓Siglec–8 | ↑CD206, CD163, MerTKhigh, PD-L1; ↓CD11c | ↑TLR2, MARCO, CD11b; ↑CD206, CD163, CD36 | CD80, CD86, CD14, TLR2/6; NLRP3–ASC specks | CD206, CD163, MerTK, TIM-4, scavenger Rs | ↑TLR4, CD14, MD-2, FcγR, CR3; ↑CD11b, CD80 | ↑CD206, CD163, MerTK, IL-10R; ↓TLR4 |
| Signature cytokines / chemokines | GM-CSF, TGF-β, SP-A/D (basal) | TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL8/IL-8; HMGB1, S100A8/A9 | IL-10, TGF-β, PDGF, VEGF, MMP-9/12 | TNF-α, IL-1β, TGF-β, CCL18, PDGF | TNF-α, mature IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL8 | IL-10, TGF-β, Arg1 metabolites, PDGF, MMP-9 | IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, CXCL10 | IL-10, TGF-β, PDGF, MMP-9 |
| Enzymes / mediators | Balanced cathepsins; surfactant enzymes; basal HMOX1 | iNOS (NOS2), NO, NOX2-ROS; active caspase-1 | Arginase-1, MMP-9/12, chitotriosidase | NOX2, cathepsin B/L, MMP-9; heme oxygenase (HO-1) | High iNOS, ROS burst, caspase-1, GSDMD | Arginase-1, ABCA1/G1 efflux, CHI3L1 | iNOS, NADPH-oxidase, caspase-1, GSDMD | Arginase-1, CHI3L1, MMP-9 |
| Key signaling / TFs | PPARγ, KLF4, basal NRF2 | NF-κβ (p65), AP-1, HIF-1α; NLRP3 inflammasome | STAT3, STAT6, SMAD2/3; re-engaged PPARγ | NF-κβ, AP-1, HIF-1α, STAT6 | NF-κβ, p38-MAPK, MyD88, NLRP3 | STAT3, STAT6, PPARγ; epigenetic gain at ARG1/MRC1 | NF-κβ, IRF3, STAT1 | STAT3, PPARγ, IRF4 |
| Metabolic / redox profile | OXPHOS; FA β-oxidation; high GSH; low ROS | Aerobic glycolysis; NADPH-oxidase; GSH depletion; itaconate-low | FA oxidation; itaconate-high; partial antioxidant recovery | Chronic glycolysis + FAO; elevated ROS; iron handling | Glycolysis; PPP; NADPH for ROS | Arginine depletion; itaconate↑; FAO; glutamine anaplerosis | Aerobic glycolysis; succinate↑; ROS | FAO recovery; NADPH regeneration; itaconate↑ |
| Functional outcome | Efficient phagocytosis; surfactant clearance | “Primed but paralyzed”; tissue injury; neutrophil influx | Fibrosis/emphysema; impaired clearance | Chronic inflammation; fibrogenic signaling; PM retention | Effective early killing; tissue injury risk | Resolution with risk of persistence/remodeling | Rapid bacterial killing; pyroptosis; inflammation | Suppressed inflammation; risk of chronic colonization |
| Clinical / pathology conditions | Healthy lung; immune silence | Acute COPD exacerbation; early particle toxicity | Late fibrosis (silicosis, asbestosis) | Coal-workers’ pneumoconiosis; PM fibrosis | Post-Mp organizing pneumonia; acute Mp pneumonia | Post-Mp convalescence; regulatory myeloid dominance | Acute Gram-negative pneumonia; necrotizing pneumonia | Post-Kp recovery; risk of bronchiectasis |
Siglec-F is a mouse AM marker; the human analogue is Siglec-8; (↑) is increased; (↓) decreased; R = receptor.
Table 2B.
Phenotypic and molecular markers that characterize alveolar macrophages (AM) during infection with (i) infection with Influenza A (flu) and (ii) infection with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). For the two exposure conditions, the table distinguishes the early “M1-like” proinflammatory phase from the later “M2-skewed” or reparative phase that often follows prolonged or repeated stimulation.(587, 610–614, 617–619, 654, 656, 661, 673–675)
| Influenza A (flu) | SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Early M1 burst | Chronic / Late M2 drift | Early M1 burst | Chronic / Late M2 drift |
| Surface / phenotypic markers | ↑CD80, ↑CD86, ↑MHC-II, ↑TLR3, ↑TLR7, ↑CD11b, ↑CD38 | ↑CD206, ↑CD163, ↑MerTK, ↑PD-L1, ↑TIM-4, ↑SIRPα | ↑CD80, ↑CD86, ↑MHC-II (variably), ↑TLR7/8 sensing, ↑CD11b; appearance of inflammatory monocyte-like macrophages (CD14+/CD16+/CCR2+) | ↑CD206, ↑CD163, ↑MerTK, ↑PD-L1, ↑TIM-4, ↑SIRPα; expansion of tissue-resident reparative phenotype in convalescence |
| Signature cytokines / chemokines | IFN-α/β, TNF-α, IL-6, CXCL10, CCL2, GM-CSF | IL-10, TGF-β, PDGF, CCL22, IL-1Ra | IFN-I (often blunted), IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL10, GM-CSF | IL-10, TGF-β, CCL18, IL-1Ra, growth factors (VEGF/PDGF) during repair |
| Enzymes / mediators | iNOS, NOX2, cathepsin B, PKR, OAS1, ISG15 | Arginase-1, MMP-9, CHI3L1, HO-1 | iNOS (variable), ROS, inflammasome activation (NLRP3 → IL-1β/IL-18), high ferritin-associated responses | Arginase-1, MMPs (remodeling), HO-1, pro-resolving mediators (lipoxins, resolvins in recovery) |
| Key signaling / TFs | IRF3, IRF7, NF-κβ, AP-1, STAT1 | STAT3, STAT6, PPARγ, IRF4 | NF-κβ, IRF3/7 (dysregulated), NLRP3 inflammasome, STAT1, AP-1 | STAT3, STAT6, PPARγ, IRF4; resolution-associated transcriptional programs |
| Metabolic / redox profile | Aerobic glycolysis↑, pentose phosphate pathway↑, ROS↑ | FAO↑, glutathione↑, itaconate↑ | Glycolysis↑ in inflammatory macrophages, mitochondrial stress, ROS↑, glycolytic rewiring in recruited monocyte-derived cells | FAO↑, mitochondrial recovery, increased antioxidant pathways, itaconate and pro-resolving metabolites ↑ |
| Functional outcome | Early virus clearance; tissue injury; neutrophil influx | Resolution/remodeling; suppress viral inflammation | Excessive inflammation, endothelial activation, alveolar injury, microthrombosis; impaired efferocytosis and antigen presentation in severe cases | Tissue repair and fibrosis risk; suppression of inflammation but potential for persistent fibrotic remodeling and impaired host defense |
| Clinical / pathology conditions | Influenza A viral pneumonia, ARDS risk | Post-influenza organizing pneumonia; risk of secondary infection | COVID-19 pneumonia, hypoxemic respiratory failure, ARDS, thromboinflammation, multisystem ammatory features | Post-COVID organizing pneumonia, fibrosis, prolonged respiratory symptoms |
Ozone
Ozone (O3) is a potent oxidant gas that, upon inhalation, rapidly reacts with the thin aqueous film lining the airways and alveoli, generating a host of ROS/RNS as well as oxidized lipids and proteins. These oxidized molecules act as danger signals or DAMPs, engaging pattern-recognition receptors (TLRs, NLRP3) on AM, triggering a rapid shift towards a pro-inflammatory, M1-like phenotype.(2, 145, 172) Acute ozone exposure of AM up-regulates NF-κβ and AP-1 signaling pathways,(178) driving transcription of Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and chemokines (e.g., CCL2, CXCL1).(178–181) At the same time, iNOS is induced, fueling a surge of nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide production augmented by NADPH oxidase.(182–186) This oxidative burst helps clear oxidized debris but also damages the epithelial barrier, increases vascular permeability leading to edema, and accelerates neutrophil recruitment.
Paradoxically, macrophage phagocytic capacity is often reduced during this phase, as oxidative modifications of surfactant proteins and cytoskeletal elements impair phagocytosis.(178, 187–190) With repeated or chronic ozone challenge, AM undergo adaptive shifts that alter their phenotype and function. Persistent oxidative stress and ongoing tissue injury gradually induce antioxidant pathways, most notably Nrf2-driven expression of antioxidant enzymes, including heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), glutathione synthesis enzymes, and superoxide dismutases to blunt the pro-inflammatory response.(181, 191, 192) Concurrently, their polarization begins to shift, and a partial M2 or pro-resolving phenotype (Mres) emerges. AM secrete higher levels of IL-10 and TGF-β, express scavenger receptors (CD206, MerTK), and shift their metabolic flux toward fatty acid oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation in place of glycolysis, which is a hallmark of M2 phenotype.(193)
Although this adaptive “resolution-oriented” reprogramming helps limit unchecked inflammation and promotes clearance of apoptotic cells, it can also foster airway remodeling, fibrosis, and stiffening of alveolar walls if TGF-β remains elevated.(194–196) Ozone-exposed AM may show reduced microbial killing and antigen presentation, which increases susceptibility to respiratory infections. Taken together, ozone exposure first drives AM into a hyperinflammatory state that clears oxidized damage at the cost of tissue integrity; over time, AM develop enhanced antioxidant defenses and adopt a partial reparative phenotype that, if unchecked, may lead to pathological remodeling and increased susceptibility to lung disease. Therefore, in ozone-exposed AM, the balance between acute defense driven by M1 and adaptive M2/pro-resolving programming is crucial in determining whether the lung injury resolves or progresses toward chronic airway disease.
Cigarette Smoke and Particulate Matter (PM)
Cigarette smoke, delivers a complex aerosol of chemicals including reactive aldehydes (acrolein, formaldehyde), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heavy metals, nitric oxide, and other oxygen-nitrogen intermediates and nicotine.(197, 198) Ambient or occupational particulate matter (PM) delivers to the lungs a heterogeneous mixture of carbon cores coated with transition metals, sulfates, nitrates, and organic compounds. Particles with aerodynamic diameter of ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) are readily deposited in the small airways and alveoli.(199–201) Normally, AM rapidly clear these inhaled particles by phagocytosis, subsequently undergoing apoptosis or removal by the mucociliary transport apparatus or efferocytosis by other macrophages.(145). However, when the particulate burden becomes chronic through repeated smoking, polluted work environments, or urban smog, AM experience sustained chemical and physical stress that rewires virtually every aspect of their biology.
The initial pivotal impact of these toxicants is an intense burst of oxidative and electrophilic stress that drives AM toward a classically activated M1 phenotype, characterized by the production of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL8, iNOS, and ROS. Quinones and particulate matter-bound metals such as iron, nickel, and copper(199, 202–205) catalyze the generation of hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite.(206). Concurrently, reactive aldehydes form covalent adducts with thiol groups on proteins, deplete intracellular glutathione, and hamper critical antioxidant defenses. Initially activation of NRF2 results in a protective response by up-regulating heme oxygenase-1, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase-1, and glutamate–cysteine ligase. However, chronic exposure leads to the degradation of NRF2 and carbonyl modification of its co-activators.(207–214) The resulting redox imbalance damages lipids, proteins, and DNA (which impairs mitochondrial function), promotes AM toward a chronically pro-oxidant state, and perpetuates mitochondrial dysfunction.
Oxidative stress intersects with innate receptor signaling to generate a paradoxical “primed but paralyzed” AM phenotype. Engagement of TLRs (like TLR 2, TLR4) and scavenger receptors (MARCO) by smoke particles and PM activates NF-κβ, AP-1, and MAPK cascades, driving high-level secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) and chemokines such as CXCL8/IL-8 that orchestrate neutrophil infiltration and perpetuate airway inflammation.(215–222) Furthermore, phagolysosomal rupture by engulfed particles allows cathepsin leakage into the cytosol, activating the NLRP3 inflammasome, which generates mature IL-1β and IL-18.(223) At the same time, carbonyls such as acrolein in smoke and soluble components of PM, inhibit MyD88-dependent signaling, reduce STAT1 phosphorylation, and down-regulate key phagocytic receptors (MARCO, SR-A, FcγRs)(224–228) resulting in AM that contribute to inflammation and lose their ability to phagocytose microbes and apoptotic-cell clearance (efferocytosis).(229). These maladaptive changes may contribute to the development of COPD and recurrent infections.
Repeated exposure to smoke and particulate matter drives a drift toward an immunosuppressive, tissue-remodeling M2-like state marked by arg-1, CD206, CD163, and secretion of IL-10, TGF-β, VEGF, and platelet-derived growth factors (PDGF). AM secrete matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-9, MMP-12) and cathepsins, while oxidative inactivation of α1-antitrypsin and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor removes the brakes on elastolytic activity.(230–234) Elastin and collagen fibers within the alveolar wall are progressively destroyed, expanding airspace and generating the hallmark emphysematous lesions of COPD. In parallel, TGF-β and PDGF released from stressed macrophages stimulate fibroblast proliferation and myofibroblast differentiation, linking particulate exposure not only to emphysema but also to small-airway fibrosis and remodeling.(235–237)
In addition to these functional alterations, repeated exposure to cigarette smoke and PM imprint long-lasting epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming on AM. DNA methylation changes at loci (e.g., aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AHRR) and cytochrome P450 genes), loss of histone deacetylase-2 (HDAC2), and shifts in microRNA profiles (increased miR-21 and miR-155, decreased miR-146a) lock cells into a semi-activated, steroid-resistant state phenotype that persists even after smoking cessation. This is a form of maladaptive “trained immunity.” AM switch to glycolytic metabolisms which reinforces their pro-inflammatory states.(238–252)
Phenotypically, sustained oxidative stress, aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling, excessive efferocytosis, and epigenetic rewiring promote this M1-M2 conversion, while a metabolic switch to fatty-acid oxidation dampens antimicrobial ROS production. This shift from an early injurious M1 surge to chronic, protease-rich yet immunosuppressive M2 dominance, underpins the clinical characterization of COPD: accelerated decline in lung-function, emphysema, small-airway fibrosis, frequent infectious exacerbations, and poor corticosteroid responsiveness.(253–261) Eliminating this maladaptive response requires elimination of exposure, such as smoking cessation, air-quality control, and re-calibrating macrophage biology (e.g., antioxidants that restore NRF2 activity, PPARγ or Arg-1 inhibitors that rebalance M1/M2 polarization, and agents that preserve HDAC2 function).(262–264)
Asbestos, Silica, and Coal Dust
Mineral dust, most notably crystalline silica, asbestos fibers, and coal mine dust, poses unique challenges that overwhelm the injury to AM degradative machinery. The interaction of these particles with AM is a key early step in the pathogenesis of pneumoconiosis, asbestosis, and progressive fibrosis. Upon encountering respirable crystalline silica, AM internalize the particles into phagolysosomes. Unlike organic material that is broken down by enzymes, silica crystals rupture and destabilize the phagolysosomal membrane, causing leakage of proteolytic enzymes and cathepsins into the cytosol. This breach activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, culminating in caspase-1-dependent cleavage of pro-IL-1β to mature IL-1β (a potent pyrogen and recruiter of neutrophils) and an explosive M1 response.(265–271) This event triggers macrophage apoptosis or an inflammatory cell death called pyroptosis. The dying macrophages then release their proinflammatory contents, including IL-1β and TNF-α, perpetuating a chronic inflammatory milieu in the lung parenchyma. In the sub-acute phase, many of the surviving macrophages phagocytose apoptotic debris and transition toward an M2/M2-like phenotype that expresses Arg-1, mannose receptor (CD206) and high levels of TGF-β.(272, 273) AM containing silica become paradoxically immunosuppressed with phagolysosomal acidification and IFN-γ signaling, thereby explaining the well-known susceptibility of silicotic lungs to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.(274–276)
Asbestos fibers present a different physical challenge to AM. Many amphibole and chrysotile fibers exceed the length macrophages can fully engulf, leading to “frustrated phagocytosis.”(Figure 8) AM adhere to protruding fiber ends while their NADPH oxidase remains chronically activated, producing a sustained burst of RO and RN species.(277–283) Early M1 polarization is e driven not only by classical cytokines but also by the oxidative stress pathways NF-κβ and AP-1. To sequester the foreign bodies, AM (and later adjacent type II pneumocytes) coat the fibers with an iron-protein shell, creating golden-brown “ferruginous bodies,” which become histologic hallmarks of exposure. In addition, AM switch toward an M2/M2-like profile.(284–290) The iron catalyzes Fenton reactions, generating hydroxyl radicals that impose additional oxidative stress on nearby epithelial and mesothelial cells. These activated macrophages secrete high levels of TGF-β, PDGF, VEGF, and matrix metalloproteinases, driving diffuse interstitial (asbestosis) and pleural fibrosis.(291–293) Simultaneously, asbestos-induced epigenetic reprogramming (histone acetylation, miR-21 up-regulation) locks the cells into a chronic, low-grade M2-dominant state. This dominant state supports fibroblast proliferation through ROS-mediated DNA damage, contributing to the initiation of bronchogenic carcinoma and malignant mesothelioma.(293–300)
Figure 8: Graphical illustration showing” frustrated phagocytosis” induced by a long asbestos fiber:

AM phagocytose and clear short asbestos fibers. However, asbestos fibers longer than 10μM present a challenge to AM engulfment, leading to frustrated phagocytosis. NADPH oxidase (NOX) produces ROS, which results in NF-kβ mediated expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines. To sequester the uncleared fiber, AM coat the fiber with iron leading to generation of hydroxyl radicals. This chronic condition of oxidative stress results in the secretion of TGF-β and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) which may result in fibrosis. Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
In coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (“black lung”), inhaled coal dust often mixed with silica, is engulfed by AM but resists enzymatic degradation, due to its inert carbonaceous core. These pigment-laden “anthracotic macrophages,” which also contain silica, remain in a state of chronic low-level activation. Repeated lysosomal damage and ROS generation engage the NLRP3 inflammasome, yielding IL-1β, TNF-α, and further oxidative stress. Many macrophages undergo pyroptosis, releasing DAMPs that recruit additional inflammatory cells. Over time, surviving AM shift toward an M2-like, fibrogenic phenotype, up-regulating arg-1, CD206, and TGF-β to wall off dust in fibrotic nodules.(77, 170, 273, 301–304) Excessive extracellular matrix build-up and collagen cross-linking around these nodules drives progressive fibrosis, which stiffens lung tissue, disrupts ventilation-perfusion balance, and can culminate in respiratory failure.
Despite their distinct modes of injury, chemical lytic damage by silica, asbestos’s frustrated phagocytosis, iron-catalyzed oxidative stress, and inert pigment overload by coal dust, converge on a common pathophysiologic theme. This persistent activation converts a homeostatic sentinel into a chronic source of oxidants, proteases, and fibrogenic mediators. Over time, the resulting matrix deposition stiffens lung parenchyma, impairs pulmonary function, and, in the case of silica and coal dust, compromises antimicrobial activity, predisposing patients to tuberculosis. In the case of asbestos, the combination of iron-catalyzed free radicals and cytokine-driven cell proliferation underlies a marked increase in neoplastic risk.(305–307) Thus, the AM, designed to preserve pulmonary homeostasis, become the pivotal drivers of occupational lung diseases.
Food Particles--Gastric Aspiration
Pulmonary aspiration of acid and gastric contents is thought to cause acute lung injury.(308) The extent and severity of lung injury depends on the quantity and nature of the aspirate, the frequency of aspiration events, and the host’s response to the aspirated material.(309) Gastric acid aspiration has been attributed to as much as 15.6% of ARDS cases.(310–312) Clinically, pulmonary aspiration is characterized by bronchospasm, pulmonary edema, hypoxemia, and respiratory failure resulting from inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Upon exposure to gastric contents or food particles, AM detect pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and DAMPs via toll-like and NOD-like receptors, activating NF-κβ, inflammasomes, MAPK, and JAK-STAT pathways. This leads to the secretion of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, which recruit neutrophils and amplify local injury. (313–317) AM, thus, play a dual but diametrically opposite role: on the one hand, they clear aspirated material; on the other hand, they contribute to inflammation and tissue damage by generating injurious agents and attracting neutrophils to the lungs.(314, 315, 318)
Polarization into M1 or M2 phenotypes critically influences outcomes post-aspiration.(316) M1 macrophages, driven by IFN-γ and LPS engulf and phagocytose food particles. However, they may cause fibrosis if overly activated.(79, 319) M2 macrophages, triggered by IL-4/IL-13, support resolution, efferocytosis, and repair. Aspiration usually leads to early M1 dominance, followed by a transition to M2, helping to restore alveolar homeostasis.(79, 319) AM rapidly shift phenotypes in response to aspirated acid, food particles, or toxins, which contribute to chronic aspiration syndromes.(314, 320, 321) Acid aspiration suppresses phagocytosis and TNF-α release, whereas particulate matter intensifies inflammation. Activation states are further defined by metabolic reprogramming (glycolysis in M1, oxidative phosphorylation in M2, and epigenetic changes).(315, 322–324)
Interactions between AM, airway epithelium, and interstitium shape aspiration pathophysiology.(315, 325) Epithelial alarmins like IL-33 and HMGB1 activate AM by binding to ST2 and RAGE receptors, escalating inflammation.(326, 327) Macrophage-derived TGF-β and VEGF contribute to remodeling and fibrosis in recurrent aspiration.(328) Oxidative stress from epithelial injury promotes conversion of high molecular hyaluronan (HMW-HA), an anti-inflammatory agent, to pro-inflammatory low molecular hyaluronan (LMW-HA), which activates AM and recruits immune cells. This makes LMW-HA a potential biomarker for aspiration pneumonia.(329–332) Therapeutic strategies targeting polarization, enhancing M2 repair, or limiting M1 activation are under investigation. Agents like pioglitazone (PPAR-γ agonist) and NF-κβ inhibitors reduce cytokine release and neutrophil influx.(333, 334) Immunometabolic and epigenetic interventions, including HDAC inhibitors, show promise in promoting reparative macrophage phenotypes.(335). This makes AM an important therapeutic target in aspiration-related lung injury.
Another important component of aspiration is hydrochloric acid (HCl), which injures AM, reducing their adhesion to surfaces. This acid-induced injury can elicit a more robust inflammatory response in the lungs, with increased neutrophil recruitment and potential contribution to fibrosis. In vitro studies have shown that macrophage function can be negatively impacted by both the acid itself and by inflammatory factors released by other damaged cells, such as neutrophils.(336–338)
Summary: Alveolar-Macrophage Plasticity as a Unifying Determinant of Lung Outcome after Environmental Injury
AM are the lung’s gatekeepers. They phagocytose inhaled particles, patrol for microbes, and secrete growth factors that maintain the epithelial barrier. Virtually every inhaled or aspirated agent, whether ozone, cigarette smoke, mineral dust, or gastric contents, first encounters these resident phagocytes. The nature, intensity, and duration of that encounter dictate whether the lung fully recovers or proceeds toward chronic inflammation and fibrosis. A conserved “alarm” program characterizes the earliest macrophage response to all these insults. Pattern-recognition receptors (TLRs, NLRP3) on AM surfaces sense oxidized lipids, free radicals, crystalline edges of silica, and mtDNA from damaged mitochondria of epithelial cells. Within minutes NF-κβ and AP-1 are activated, iNOS synthase and NADPH oxidase generate a burst of ROS/RNS, and large amounts of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and neutrophil-recruiting chemokines are released. Although this classical M1-like response helps degrade or sequester harmful material, it also disrupts epithelial tight junctions, increases permeability, and transiently impairs phagocytosis.
Despite their distinct toxicants, all these events converge on several mechanistic themes: (i) Redox overload coupled with imperfect antioxidant recovery; (ii) Chronic NLRP3 inflammasome signaling; (iii) Epigenetic “locks” that maintain maladaptive phenotypes (HDAC2 loss, AHRR methylation, miR-21 up-regulation); and (iv) metabolic reprogramming acute glycolysis for M1 and fatty acid oxidation for M2. These shared pathways reveal therapeutic targets. Reactivating Nrf2, replenishing thiols, or supplying mitochondrial antioxidants can reset redox balance; PPAR-γ agonists or arginase-1 inhibitors may rebalance M1/M2 polarization; and preserving HDAC2 or blocking NLRP3/IL-1β may quell steroid-resistant inflammation and fibrosis.
Pulmonary Infections and their Impact on AM Polarization and Function
AM coordinate innate and adaptive responses during pulmonary infections. They detect and engulf pathogens, produce ROS and RNS, and secrete a spectrum of cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β) and chemokines (e.g., CXCL8/IL-8) that attract neutrophils and monocytes. This recruitment fosters a multicellular antibacterial front, while antigen presentation by activated macrophages primes T-cell responses that tailor immunity to specific organisms.(8, 146, 339–341)
The outcome of pulmonary infections often hinges on the effectiveness and restraint of AM alveolar macrophage activity. If activation is insufficient, pathogens such as mycobacterium tuberculosis, streptococcus pneumoniae, mycoplasma pneumoniae, klebsiella pneumoniae, influenza virus, or SARS-CoV-2 can replicate unchecked, leading to pneumonia, acute lung injury, or disseminated disease. Conversely, excessive or dysregulated macrophage activation contributes to immunopathology, typified by the “cytokine storm” in severe viral pneumonias and by chronic inflammation and fibrosis in conditions such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis or ARDS.
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae)
AM along with SP-A and SP-D, which play crucial roles in innate immunity by opsonizing pathogens and modulating macrophage activation.(342–344) M. pneumoniae accounts for 20–30% of all pneumonias, leading to illnesses such as tracheobronchitis, bronchiolitis, pharyngitis, pneumonia, and possibly ARDS. In addition, M. pneumoniae may exacerbate other respiratory disorders such as COPD and asthma. Moreover, because of the widely diverse clinical manifestations and the need for specialized testing for identification of active infections, it is clear that M. pneumoniae diseases are underdiagnosed.(345–347) (Figure 9)
Figure 9: Phagocytosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) by AM.

(A) Lipoproteins present on the surface of MP are recognized by TLR2/TLR6 heterodimers expressed on AM triggering activation of NF-κβ via the MyD88 dependent pathway. Additionally, MP secretes community-acquired respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) toxin that activates NLRP3-mediated maturation of IL-1β. In the alveolar space, surfactants SP-A and SP-D help enhance phagocytosis of MP by opsonizing them. Altogether, these signals activate AM causing them to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). (B) MP activate AM into M1-phenotyple through MAPK-NF-kβ signaling and secrete various pro-inflammatory mediators including IL-23, IL-1, and IGF-1. IGF-1 inhibits endogenous inflammatory signals in alveolar epithelial cells.(686) AEC regulates inflammation by secreting inhibitory cytokines including IL-10, TGF-β, PGE2, and GMCSF which switch AM from the M1 to the M2 state. Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
When M. pneumoniae enter the alveolar space, their cholesterol-rich, Wall-less membrane and abundant surface lipoproteins are immediately sensed by AM pattern-recognition receptors, most prominently TLR2/TLR6 heterodimers.(348–353) Engagement of these receptors triggers MyD88-dependent signaling cascades culminating in NF-κβ and MAP kinase activation, which drives transcription of M1-associated genes.(349, 354, 355) Concurrently, M. pneumoniae secrete the community-acquired respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) toxin, which activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to caspase-1-mediated maturation and release of IL-1β(356) (Figure 8). Together, CARDS and IL-1β drive AM toward an M1 phenotype. The resulting pro-inflammatory response, regulated in part by interactions with surfactant protein A (SP-A), is essential for early containment of M. pneumoniae. AM phagocytose and kill mycoplasma by generating peroxynitrite. When infected intranasally with M. pulmonis C57BL/6 mice lacking SP-A or iNOS had significantly higher levels of mycoplasmas in their lungs as compared to wild type controls.(342, 357–359) Furthermore, depletion of AM by intranasal instillation of liposome-encapsulated dichloromethylene bisphosphonate (L-Cl2MBP) decreased the killing of M. Pulmonis in C57BL/6 mice.(360)
As the infection progresses, M. pneumoniae deploy several strategies to temper the M1 response and facilitate their existence. Engagement of TLR2 by lipoproteins, along with direct effects of CARDS toxin on host signaling pathways, gradually shift AM toward the M2-like or regulatory phenotype. The pathogens and infected epithelial cells secrete IL-10 and TGF-β, which activate STAT3 and STAT6 (361–364). These transcription factors induce expression of arg-1, which inhibit iNOS, and upregulate scavenger receptors and mannose receptors (CD206). SP-A and SP-D influence this phenotypic shift, as they can dampen the inflammation and further modulate macrophage responses. M. pneumoniae also interferes with phagolysosomal maturation and scavenges host antioxidants, allowing a fraction of organisms to persist intracellularly or remain attached to damaged epithelium.(356, 365, 366).
The shift between M1 and M2 polarization in Mycoplasma infection has important pathophysiologic consequences (367, 368). An exaggerated or prolonged M1 response can trigger excessive neutrophil recruitment, oxidative tissue damage, capillary leak, and clinical features such as cough, bronchospasm, and radiologic infiltrates(369). In contrast, an early or overly strong M2 bias may impair pathogen clearance and promote chronic or recurrent infection, airway remodeling, and persistent inflammation.(370) Surfactant proteins continually participate in these processes, either enhancing pathogen clearance or contributing to the resolution of inflammation. Thus, the timing and degree of macrophage polarization, shaped in part by surfactant proteins, critically influence whether the host experiences a self-limited pneumonia or develops complications such as bronchiolitis obliterans or post-infectious reactive airway disease.(371, 372)
Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae)
K. pneumoniae is a Gram-negative, heavily encapsulated bacterium that has become a leading cause of both hospital-acquired and community-acquired pneumonia. AM recognize K. pneumoniae primarily via TLR4 engagement of LPS, and to a lesser extent via TLR2 by recognition of outer-membrane lipoproteins. SP-A and SP-D bind to exposed surface carbohydrates or LPS motifs on Klebsiella, bridging the bacterium to AM scavenger receptors and enhancing uptake. Indeed, SP-A drives the killing of K. pneumoniae by human AM isolated from transplanted lungs in vitro through stimulation of phagocytosis and generation of ROS intermediates.(373)(Figure 10) Thus, the efficiency of early pathogen detection depends not only on classical PRRs but also on the availability and integrity of these surfactant proteins.(145, 374–378)
Figure 10: Interaction of AM with Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP):

(A) Surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D opsonize KP, which facilitates their phagocytosis by AM, leading to ROS generation and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. KP also activates AM via surface TLRs to produce various inflammatory mediators, which results in the recruitment of various immune cells including neutrophils and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs) to the lung alveolar space. (B) KP components, such as outer membrane protein A (OmpA), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and capsular polysaccharides (CPS), are recognized by TLR2 and TLR4 and activate AM via the MAPK-NF-kβ pathway to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines and ROS. (C) Phagocytosed KP activates the type 6-secretion-system in response to generated ROS, which activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, which cleaves pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into mature IL-1β and IL-18 and mounts an inflammatory response. (D) KP infected AM produces high levels of itaconate and α-ketoglutarate that promote fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and OXPHOS which favors M2 phenotype with upregulated arginase 1 (ARG1), CD206, and CD163. This activation leads to the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and M2-like macrophages in the lung.(627) Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
This initial encounter drives a rapid polarization of AM toward the M1 phenotype. TLR- and collectin-mediated signaling converges on NF-κβ and MAP-kinase pathways, inducing transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) and chemokines (CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL1, CCL2). SP-A and SP-D amplify this response by boosting cytokine release and enhancing phagolysosomal fusion in the early hours of infection. M1-polarized AM increase glycolysis, up-regulate iNOS, and generate ROS, all of which are crucial for limiting bacterial replication and killing.(378–383)
K. pneumoniae counters these defenses through multiple evasion strategies. For example, it has been reported that K. pneumoniae ’s thick polysaccharide capsule, shields underlying antigens from SP-A and SP-D, allowing the pathogen to evade rapid clearance, to proliferate, and produce the dense, lobe-filling infiltrates and necrotic lung damage characteristic of severe K. pneumoniae.(373, 384–386)Its mucoid capsule contains SP-A/SP-D binding sites and blocks phagocytosis. In addition, ROS and RNS will nitrate and oxidize residues in the collectins carbohydrate recognition domain decreasing their abilities to opsonize pathogens.(387–389) Thus, K. pneumoniae may prolong their extracellular survival and sustain the M1-driven inflammatory milieu. The sustained influx of neutrophils and release of oxidants and proteases, although bactericidal, also injure the epithelial barrier, predisposing the lung to edema, hemorrhage, and, in severe cases, ARDS.(390–392)
As tissue damage accumulates, anti-inflammatory mediators such as IL-10, TGF-β become more prominent, driving AM toward the M2 phenotype. Furthermore, SP-A and SP-D promote this transition by engaging signal-regulatory protein-α (SIRPα) and other inhibitory receptors on the macrophage surface.(376, 393, 394, 394–397) A carefully timed M2 shift is essential for wound resolution; however, if it occurs prematurely or becomes dominant while viable bacteria are still present, it may result in the persistence and dissemination of Klebsiella.(76, 392, 398) Clinical studies have shown that patients with low levels or dysfunctional variants of SP-A or SP-D are more prone to chronic or relapsing Klebsiella infections, highlighting how deficiencies in surfactant protein driven regulation of macrophage phenotype can tip the balance toward bacterial persistence and maladaptive repair.(376, 382, 399)
Recognizing the dual role of surfactant proteins in regulating AM polarization has opened new therapeutic avenues. Recombinant SP-A/SP-D or small molecules that enhance their expression are being explored to improve opsonization and early M1 efficacy.(52, 400, 401) Alternatively, therapies that preserve collectin function while selectively decreasing NF-κβ signaling such as TLR4 antagonists and PPAR-γ agonists, are being considered.(402–407)
Influenza A Virus (IAV)
Influenza A virus (IAV), the principal agent of seasonal and pandemic “flu,” is a highly contagious respiratory pathogen capable of causing anything from mild, self-limited illness to fulminant viral pneumonia, ARDS and lethal secondary bacterial infections.(408, 409) While ciliated airway epithelium and type II pneumocytes are the primary sites of productive replication, IAV infection profoundly disturbs AM biology and function.(410–413) (Figure 11). Whether human AM support a productive IAV cycle is debated: several studies detect intracellular viral RNA and proteins, yet most report an abortive infection with little or no release of infectious progeny.(117, 414–416) This “shouldering” replication may still suffice to re-program AM and amplify inflammation while sparing neighboring epithelial cells from further seeding.
Figure 11: Detection of Influenza A virus by AM.

(A) Activation of the innate immune response: Dying influenza virus infected cells or influenza virus opsonized with surfactants proteins SP-A and SP-D are phagocytosed by AM via scavenger receptors and PRRs. Released viral RNA recognized by TLR3 and TLR7 either in endosomes or by RIG-1/MDA-5 in cytosols. This leads to the stimulated expression of NF-kβ and IRF-7-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, Il-1β, and IL-8) and type 1 interferon (IFN) via IRF3 transcription factors. Activated AM produce reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates (ROS/RNS) and rely on enhanced glycolysis for their metabolic needs. (B) Adaptive immune response initiation: Internalized viral components undergo antigen processing and present them to helper T cells and cytotoxic CD8 T cells via MHCII and MHCI respectively resulting in activation of the adaptive immune response. Activated T cells, particularly CD8 T cells, kill the virus and decreases the viral load. (C) AM anergy: Influenza virus downregulates the expression of scavenger and activation receptors as well as inhibits phagocytosis capability of AM. Influenza infection causes a drastic depletion of AM population (anergy) in the lung, which results in compromised innate and adaptive immune responses. This condition leads to the secondary infection caused by bacteria and fungi. (D) Recovery phase: Enhanced expression of PDL1 on AM and TGF-β signaling differentiates the naïve T cells to regulatory T cells (Treg) and release of IL-10. Inflammation is inhibited by increased expression of CD200R and scavenger receptors as well as activation of PPARγ/STAT6. Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
The scenario dramatically shifts when the influenza virus enters the airways. AM phagocytose flu virions and debris, acting as sentinels that sense viral RNA through endosomal TLR-7 and cytosolic RIG-I/MDA-5.(417, 418) Activation of MyD88-, TRIF-, and MAVS-dependent pathways drives AM away from resting homeostasis. Transcription factors such as NF-κβ, IRF3, and IRF7 move into the nucleus to induce interferon-stimulated genes and pro-inflammatory cytokines.(341, 419–421) Within just 4 hours, type I IFN genes dominate the transcriptome, and TNF-α peaks between 4 and 8 hours post-infection, confirming AM as the first-responder “cytokine sprinters.”(422) The AM metabolism shifts from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis to fuel an energetic burst needed for acute defense. Direct mitochondrial damage (accumulation of swollen, abnormal organelles and down-regulation of oxidative-phosphorylation genes) further enforces this glycolytic bias.(74, 423, 424)
At the same time, SP-A and SP-D, coat influenza virions promoting rapid phagocytosis and better detection by macrophage antiviral sensors.(8, 340, 425, 426) There is increased expression of antigen-presenting markers (MHC-II, CD80, CD86) and Fc receptors (CD64), while markers associated with the M2 phenotype (such as CD206) and arg-1 tend to decline.(427, 428) Concomitantly, type I IFN signaling suppresses PPAR-γ which correlates with delayed pneumonia resolution.(82) AM produce inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) and chemokines (CXCL10, CCL2, CCL5), which attract neutrophils, NK cells, and monocytes to the alveolar space.(420, 421, 429, 430) These recruited cells cooperate with AM to contain viral replication and clear infected epithelial cells. ROS and RNS generated by activated AM further destroy viral particles but can also inflict collateral injury on the delicate lung parenchyma and surfactant layer.(145, 431) Despite this early burst, AM still secrete fewer inflammatory mediators than blood-derived macrophages, revealing a built-in ceiling that limits by-stander damage under physiological conditions.(432)
If influenza infection is mild and short-lived, these changes are usually reversible. Many seasonal H1N1/H3N2 infections remain confined to the upper airway and may barely engage AM at all.(413) However, in more severe or repeated infections a more complex picture emerges. Persistent pattern-recognition signaling keeps AM fixed in an inflammatory M1-state, with high levels of iNOS, ROS, and cytokine output.(59, 145, 428) Moreover, chronic oxidative stress oxidizes surfactant phospholipids, undermining their biophysical role in maintaining alveolar stability and further impairing gas exchange.(433, 434) The resulting “immunoparalysis” can last for weeks, characterized by reduced phagocytosis and down-regulation of scavenger receptors such as CLEC7A and MSR1, thereby predisposing to secondary infections.(435)
In addition, Influenza viruses that entered AM activate the inflammasomes (notably NLRP3) that triggers pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis).(436–439) The viral PB1-F2 protein, by targeting mitochondria and collapsing membrane potential, is a leading candidate for this cytotoxic effect.(440) In murine models, up to 60% of resident AM may be lost in the acute phase, depleting the local phagocyte pool just when robust clearance of debris and pathogens is needed.(441, 442) This “macrophage-disappearance reaction,” is absent in pigs and ferrets and not yet proven in humans, emphasizing species differences.(412, 443) Surviving AM often become functionally exhausted, showing diminished phagocytic capacity, reduced cytokine production upon secondary stimulation, and increased expression of inhibitory checkpoint molecules (PD-L1, Tim-3, CD200R).(13, 444, 445) This state, especially in the context of ongoing surfactant degradation, creates a vulnerability, which explains why convalescent patients are predisposed to secondary bacterial pneumonia caused by organisms such as Streptococcus pneumoniae.(446)
Over time, repeated or chronic infection can induce lasting epigenetic changes in AM. Histone modification patterns (such as H3K4me3 and H3K27ac) may produce ‘trained immunity,’ heightening responses to future pathogens.(447–451) Alternatively, chronic interferon exposure may drive endotoxin tolerance, leading to anergic macrophages that fail to respond to new infections. Both conditions interfere with the ability of AM to recycle surfactant, which may lead to alveolar proteinosis and compromised gas exchange.(452–454) Intriguingly, influenza-trained AM have recently been shown to confer long-term antitumor protection in the lung.(455)
During recovery, adaptive immunity, particularly neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, reduce the viral load, and pro-resolving cytokines (IL-10, resolvins, lipoxins) help transition AM to an M2-like repair state.(456–460) Their metabolism shifts back to oxidative phosphorylation, scavenger receptors such as CD206 and CD163 reappear, and repair factors such as VEGF, PDGF and amphiregulin facilitate the restoration of the epithelial barrier and basement membrane.(125, 461–463, 463–467) Surfactant homeostasis is gradually reestablished as type II pneumocytes increase surfactant synthesis and AM ingest oxidized proteins and lipids. If recovery is unimpeded, lung function may return to normal; however, repeated influenza infections or unresolved inflammation can tip the balance toward chronic fibrosis, as AM secrete TGF-β and drive persistent myofibroblast activity and collagen deposition.(468–470) Here, surfactant turnover remains disrupted and alveolar walls stiffen, establishing a feed-forward loop of mechanical stress and inflammation.
In summary, influenza virus infection initiates a dynamic process of polarization that promotes the rapid switching of AM from M2 to inflammatory M. Depending on disease severity and chronicity, possibly culminating in exhaustion, tolerance, or fibrotic dysfunction. Each state reflects the interactions of viral signals, surfactants, immunometabolism, and epigenetic memory, emphasizing the double role of AM in preventing and inducing influenza-related lung pathology.
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)
SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, is a highly transmissible respiratory virus that may cause severe viral pneumonia, ARDS, multi-organ dysfunction with long-term sequelae. Beyond targeting the ACE2-expressing airway and alveolar cells, SARS-CoV-2 infections also perturb AM biology and function.(471–474) (Figure 12) When AM are infected with SARS-CoV-2, viral RNAs are recognized by endosomal and cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors of AM (TLR7/8 and RIG-I/MDA5), and their associated adaptor molecules (MyD88, TRIF, MAVS) that promote the translocation of key transcription factors (e.g., NF-κβ, IRF3, IRF7) into the nucleus.(475–482) This, induces the production of type I/III interferons, interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), and proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), that initiate an antiviral response and recruits additional innate effectors.(473, 483, 484) Unlike other respiratory viruses, the timing and magnitude of the interferon response to SARS-CoV-2 infection are often dysregulated, delayed, or blunted. Early responses of type I IFN have been associated with worse outcomes, whereas prolonged IFN signaling can contribute to tissue pathology in severe disease.(483, 485, 486)
Figure 12: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by AM.

(A) Resident AM detect SARS-CoV-2 by endocytosis, ACE2 receptors, and the FCγR1-IgG immune complex pathway. Upon activation by viral components, AM releases various cytokines and chemokines which recruit other immune cells including bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMS), neutrophils, NK cells, and T cells into the lungs. Macrophages process viral components and present them to T helper cells and cytotoxic CD8 T cells via MHCII and MHCI respectively. Activated T helper cells secrete IFN-γ, which further activates AM; CD8 T cells secrete granzyme B, which reduces viral load. During the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the AM population is depleted (anergy) due to cell death pathways, including pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis. Infected alveolar epithelial cells (AEC) also engage in inflammation by secreting various cytokines and chemokines. (B) After internalization of the virus, released viral RNA is recognized by either TLR3 or TLR7 in the endosome or by RIG-1/MDA-5 in the cytosol. This leads to the activation of NF-kβ, IRF-7 and IRF-3 transcription factors that activate the AM to produce cytokines/chemokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, Il-1β, CCL2, and IL-8) and type-1 interferon. Activated AM mount oxidative stress and rely on glycolysis for their metabolic requirement. ROS and RNS alter surfactants SP-A and SP-D function by oxidizing them or nitrating them, reducing their capacity to opsonize the virus. (C) Circulating viral components act as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and stimulate monocytes, leading to expression of the tissue factor (coagulation factor III) on monocyte and endothelial surfaces.(531, 691) Tissue factors and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), released by neutrophils stimulate the coagulation pathway leads to accumulation of activated platelets, deposition of fibrin and collagen, and ultimately results into blood clotting. Angiotensin-converting enzyme two (ACE2); major histocompatibility complex (MHC); Fc gamma receptor type I (FCγR1). Figure created with a licensed version of Biorender.com.
Phagocytosis of SARS-CoV-2 by AM results in the upregulation of Fc receptors (CD64), antigen-presenting molecules (MHC-II, CD80/CD86), and results in the secretion of chemokines (CXCL10, CCL2, CCL5) that recruit monocytes, neutrophils, and NK cells to the alveolar space.(487–490) There is a metabolic shift of AM toward aerobic glycolysis that provides the energy needed for phagocytosis. However, when sustained, promotes robust M1-like features with high production of ROS that can damage alveolar epithelium and surfactant components. SP-A and SP-D that normally dampen inflammation may change their function in this milieu, altering opsonization and viral clearance dynamics.(491–493)
Although classical infection of SARS-CoV-2 in AM is limited due to the low expression of ACE2, viral uptake can still occur via phagocytosis of infected debris, Fc receptor–mediated pathways, or lectin interactions.(494, 495) Failed viral RNA sensing or infection can activate inflammasomes, most commonly NLRP3, leading to the release of IL-1β/IL-18 and triggering lytic cell death, which contributes to a PANoptotic milieu (pyroptosis, apoptosis, necroptosis).(496–498) These processes can reduce the resident AM pool during the acute phase, while the inflammatory byproducts amplify local tissue injury.
The chemokine-mediated influx of CCR2+monocytes differentiate into monocyte-derived macrophages within the alveolar space. These recruited cells adopt a highly proinflammatory transcriptional program distinct from that of homeostatic AM and can dominate the local cytokine milieu in severe infection.(499, 500) This shift in macrophage composition, loss of tissue-resident AM, and accumulation of inflammatory monocyte-derived macrophages, impairs surfactant recycling and amplifies the tissue-damaging responses.(341, 430, 501) AM-derived cytokines and chemokines further recruit neutrophils and prompts NETosis, endothelial activation, and cooperates with systemic inflammatory pathways to drive microvascular thrombosis and vascular leaks, the hallmarks of severe COVID-19 lung injury. ROS and proteases released from the AM degrade surfactant lipids and proteins and thereby increasing surface tension, predispose to alveolar collapse, and worsen gas exchange.(492, 502–504) The combined epithelial and endothelial injury disrupts alveolar fluid clearance and surfactant homeostasis, exacerbating hypoxemia.
Surviving AM and recruited monocyte-derived macrophages can become functionally exhausted during prolonged or severe illness, displaying impaired phagocytosis, increased cytokine responses to secondary stimuli, and upregulation of inhibitory receptors, such as PD-L1, TIM-3.(505–507) Persistent type I IFN exposure and chronic inflammatory signaling may also induce an immune tolerance in some macrophage populations.(508, 509) Along with, damaged surfactant components and impaired mucociliary clearance, this further increases the vulnerability to secondary bacterial pneumonias and delays recovery.
SARS-CoV-2 infection can leave long lasting epigenetic and metabolic marks on AM. Patterns of histone modifications and chromatin accessibility may confer a form of trained immunity, heightening responsiveness to later insults or, conversely, inducing sustained hypo-responsiveness.(510–512) In some individuals, prolonged macrophage-mediated profibrotic signaling (TGF-β production), together with epithelial injury, and altered surfactant turnover, promotes fibroblast activation and deposition of extracellular matrix, leading to post-COVID pulmonary fibrosis in some survivors.(513–516) By contrast, effective adaptive immunity, neutralizing antibodies, and virus-specific CD8+ T cells reduce viral load, while pro-resolving mediators (IL-10, specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators) and a shift toward reparative macrophage polarization helps restore homeostasis.(517–519) Post-infection or during recovery, the pool of AM are replenished, cellular metabolism reverts toward oxidative phosphorylation, reestablishing scavenger receptors (e.g., CD206, CD163), and surfactant-clearing functions, and most importantly type II pneumocytes resume surfactant synthesis.(493, 520–523) If resolution is timely, surfactant homeostasis and alveolar architecture can largely normalize; however, failure of resolution, leads to persistent inflammation, repeated injury, and maladaptive repair and chronic dysfunction. (524)
In summary, SARS-CoV-2 exposure triggers a dynamic, macrophage response that initially aims to control the virus but when dysregulated by viral factors, comorbidities, host genetics, or delayed interferon signaling, can drive inflammatory lung injury, surfactant dysfunction, and delayed repair. The balance between effective antiviral clearance and protracted immunopathology in AM largely determines disease severity and the risk of long-term pulmonary sequelae.
Differences and Similarities of Influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 Infections
Influenza A virus (IAV) and SARS-CoV- engage AM in distinct ways. IAV attaches to α2,3- or α2,6-linked sialic acids on the macrophage surface and enters the AM by endocytosis; some avian or highly pathogenic strains progress partway through the viral life-cycle, yet most human IAV strains achieve only abortive replication, producing little infectious progeny while still exposing the cell to viral RNA and proteins.(525–527) Conversely, SARS-CoV-2, depends upon the ACE2 receptor for canonical entry, so the virus usually reaches AM indirectly through phagocytosis of infected epithelial debris or via Fcγ-receptor uptake of antibody-opsonized virions.(497, 528, 529) Thus, SARS-CoV-2 is less efficient in completing a full replication cycle in AM as compared to IAV, which typically leaves behind a non-replicative viral genome that nonetheless alters macrophage physiology. On the other hand, IAV often triggers overt AM death (apoptosis or pyroptosis), whereas SARS-CoV-2 more commonly reprograms the surviving AM without causing extensive early depletion.(530–532)
These two viruses activate different inflammatory responses in AM. IAV drives an immediate, high-intensity M1-like activation, marked by a robust increase of type I interferons, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and neutrophil-attracting chemokines.(533–536) This sudden surge is further amplified by a metabolic shift towards aerobic glycolysis and succinate-driven HIF-1α signaling.(150, 536, 537) SARS-CoV-2 initially blunts type I interferon output and induces a more gradual, heterogeneous activation.(538–540) During mild COVID-19, AM adopt a mixed blend of regulatory (IL-10, TGF-β) and pro-inflammatory signals; whereas in severe cases, AM and the monocyte-derived macrophages that replace or augment them, produce high levels of IL-6, CXCL10, and CCL2, fueling the cytokine storm.(541–544) Accordingly, IAV provokes an early interferon-dominant surge that can be self-damaging, whereas SARS-CoV-2 often causes a delayed yet constant inflammatory state dominated by recruited myeloid cells.
These upstream differences result in distinct clinical outcomes. Following IAV infection, the loss of AM and their impaired phagocytic function hampers the surfactant clearance and bacterial killing, creating a favorable environment for classic post-influenza pneumonias caused by pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae or Staphylococcus aureus.(117, 413, 545–547) In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection leaves a pool of metabolically and transcriptionally altered AM that, together with recruited monocyte-derived macrophages, sustain alveolar inflammation, promote endothelial injury and, in prolonged cases, contribute to pneumonia or fibrotic remodeling. Secondary bacterial infections after a SARS infections are less frequent.(541, 542, 548, 549) Therapeutically, these differences require different strategies: following IAV infection, restoring AM numbers and phagocytic capacity is critical to prevent superinfection, whereas in COVID-19 the priority is on suppressing dysregulated macrophage-driven inflammation while preserving their antiviral and reparative capacities.
Immunotherapeutic Interventions Targeting AM
A number of emerging therapies attempt to re-programming AM rather than merely suppressing downstream inflammation. Inhaled granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) replenishes depleted AM pools, restores phagocytic competence, and lowers post-influenza bacterial pneumonia.(550–552) Different metabolic modulators, such as PPAR-γ agonists and AMPK activators attempt to convert, highly glycolytic AM back toward oxidative phosphorylation while directly curbing viral replication.(553, 554) Epigenetic interventions that erase long-lasting “immunoparalysis” are being explored to re-establish balanced antimicrobial and reparative functions after acute lung injury.(555) Short, local blockade of inhibitory checkpoints and mitochondria-protective agents that neutralize viral factors offer additional routes to rescue AM bioenergetics without provoking a cytokine storm.(541) Presently, none of these interventions are FDA approved for the treatment of occupational or pathogen induced lung diseases. In addition, their long-term cardiotoxicity, well established for cancer chemotherapeutic agents and checkpoint inhibitors (556, 557) has not been investigated.
Insights from OMIC Studies
In recent years, OMIC technologies, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics have transformed our understanding of how diverse inhaled insults have offered new insights into molecular rewiring that underlies dysfunctional AM states and unveiled novel targets for precision interventions.
Genomic and epigenomic studies have identified susceptible loci and long-lasting “Epigenetic scars” in AM exposed to pollutants, dust, M. Pneumonia, and K. Pneumoniae. Genome-wide association studies have linked variants in IL-1β, NLRP3, and MARCO to exaggerated inflammatory responses. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing has uncovered DNA hypermethylation at regulatory regions of PPARγ and IL10, as well as altered chromatin accessibility at interferon and antioxidant response elements.(558–565) K. pneumoniae infected AM show pathogen-driven chromatin remodeling with increased accessibility at TLR4, IRF3, and STAT1 effectively priming these cells for heightened cytokine production upon secondary challenges.(566, 567)
Transcriptomic analysis, spanning both bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), have identified heterogeneous AM populations following environmental or infectious conditions. For example, exposure to coal dust or particulate matter induces distinct AM subpopulations expressing high levels of inflammatory cytokine (NLRP3, IL1β), chemokines (CCL2, CXCL2), and pattern recognition receptors.(568–570) During M. Pneumoniae infection, RNA-seq analysis showed the presence of an early NF-κβ burst followed by a STAT1/IRF7-dominated interferon response; while, K. pneumoniae triggers a similar biphasic response, with an initial TLR4/NF-κβ activation followed by IRF3/IFN-β upregulation. scRNA-seq showed the presence of AM expressing high levels of CXCL10, IFNB1and IRG1, and SPP1 that coordinates downstream neutrophil and T-cell recruitment.(571–578). In K. pneumoniae, scRNA-seq identified an immunoregulatory subset expressing high levels of PD-L1 and a cathepsin-rich cluster generating high levels of ROS poised for pyroptotic death. These findings, highlight how distinct pathogens sculpt unique AM phenotypes.(394, 577, 579–583) AM of mice infected with influenza A virus exhibit distinct interferon-dominated AM and altered antigen presentation trajectories that shape antiviral responses and immunopathology.(584–592) Similarly, studies on SARS-CoV-2 infection reveal unique AM transcriptional landscapes characterized by delayed and dysregulated interferon signaling, enhanced inflammatory monocyte-derived macrophage recruitment, and the emergence of pro-fibrotic and thrombo-inflammatory gene signatures, which differentiate COVID-19 from other respiratory infections at the single-cell level.(542, 548, 549, 593) ScRNA-seq has also revealed a loss of homeostatic gene signatures and emergence of “trained immunity” profiles in AM following exposure to environmental and pathogenic agents. AM exhibit durable epigenetic and metabolic imprints, including sustained elevation of glycolytic enzymes and H3K4me3 marks at inflammatory loci, which heighten responsiveness to subsequent insults.(9, 548, 564, 565, 578, 594–597)
The integration of proteomics and metabolomics findings has further identified exposure and infection-driven transformations in AM. Proteomic studies of the AM after pollutants and M. pneumoniae challenge have identified elevated levels of oxidative enzymes (NOX2), inflammasome components (NLRP3, Caspase-1), proteases (cathepsins), remodeling proteins (MMPs), and phosphorylation of NF-κβ, MAPK cascades. Infection with M. Pneumoniae has shown increased IRG1, PKR, and antigen-presentation levels while depleting surfactant-handling proteins, indicating a metabolic diversion toward host defense.(194, 598–603) K. pneumoniae challenge enriched TLR4/MD-2 complexes and outer-membrane protein networks, signifying adaptation to Gram-negative LPS exposure.(566, 604–608) Influenza A virus infection likewise reshaped proteomic signatures toward antiviral effector and immune modulation, contributing to pathophysiology of influenza-driven lung disease.(609–613) Proteomic analysis of AM from COVID-19 patients demonstrates upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, complement factors, coagulation mediators, and markers of cellular stress, reflecting the unique thrombo-inflammatory milieu and sustained tissue damage characteristic of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.(542, 614–619) Metabolomic profiling of AM has revealed a significant decrease in itaconate and increase in succinate and lactate, supporting a shift towards glycolytic metabolism and hypoxia-inducible inflammation (HIF1α).(620–622)
In M. Pneumoniae-infected neutrophils or mixed lung-cell suspensions (rodents), LC–MS shows a significant rise in itaconate and a parallel accumulation of arachidonate-derived lipid mediators, underscoring immunometabolic rewiring that can either constrain or propagate inflammation.(603, 623–626) By contrast, AM following K. pneumoniae infection exhibit increased succinate, which promotes the release of IL-1β and a decrease in SDH–dependent itaconate synthesis.(150, 604, 627, 628) Similarly, Influenza A virus infection reprograms metabolic pathways in AM, balancing antiviral defense with inflammatory output and tissue injury, with notable shifts in glycolysis, fatty acid metabolism, and mitochondrial dynamics.(611, 612)
By integrating these multi-OMIC datasets, systems biology approaches identified central regulators (like NLRP3, NRF2, MARCO, and SLC7A11) and network “hubs” with the greatest influence over AM responses to environmental insults.(8, 629–632) These hubs provide strategic entry points for selective therapeutic targeting, ranging from NRF2 activators that temper pollutant-induced oxidative stress to metabolic modulators that curb excessive CXCL10 production during M. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae infection.(366, 633)
Focusing specifically on M. Pneumoniae, complementary CRISPR-Cas9 dropout screens reinforce STING, PKR, IRG1, MARCO, and GBP2/5 as “Tier-1” host factors, while parallel screens in K. pneumoniae models highlight TLR4, MyD88, and Vav1 as essential for bacterial clearance. Epigenomic assays reveal a TLR2–MyD88–DNMT3B axis that hyper-methylates PPARγ/IL10 and builds H3K27ac/H3K4me3 super-enhancers at CXCL10, IFNB1, and IRG1.(349, 368, 571, 577, 634–640) BET inhibition by JQ1 or I-BET15 (a class of targeted, epigenetic drugs that bind to Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal proteins) eliminates these super-enhancers and selectively depletes the AM subset that expresses high levels of CXCL10.(641–644) In addition, DNMT3B knockdown restores IL-10. Proteo-phospho profiling has identified persistent phosphorylation of p65, p38-MAPK, TBK1, and STAT1. Small-molecule TBK1 or p38 blockade temper the interferon-dominated second wave of phosphorylation in M. pneumoniae-infected mice.(645–647) Metabolite-based interventions such as exogenous dimethyl-itaconate or 5-LOX/PGE2-synthase inhibitors, dampen cytokine storms and airway hyper-reactivity in both M. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae infection models.(623, 648–652) Emerging CRISPR and epigenetic studies in SARS-CoV-2 models similarly point to key host factors regulating interferon pathways, inflammasome activation, and metabolic reprogramming, highlighting potential therapeutic targets to modulate macrophage-driven inflammation in COVID-19.(653–658)
Altogether, OMIC approaches not only dissect the complex molecular rewiring of AM by environmental pollutants and M. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), but also provide crucial insight into the development of precision therapies and biomarker-based diagnostics that may be used to monitor and mitigate combined pollutant- and infection-related lung diseases. High-Dimensional Single-Cell OMIC combined with spatial transcriptomics, proteomics, cell biological, and physiological measurements hold high promise in unraveling the heterogeneity and dynamic responses of AM subpopulations to a wide spectrum of environmental and pathological insults. Integration of these approaches with sophisticated in-vivo imaging and lineage-tracing models will illuminate how repeated or chronic exposures reshape macrophage phenotypes, their interactions with lung structural cells, and their roles in inflammation, tissue repair, and disease progression.
Unanswered Questions: Areas for Future Research
Which signals propel AM towards pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory, reparative, and pro-resolving stages when exposed to simultaneous but conflicting signals (e.g., a viral infection in addition to environmental agents)?
Which are the primary molecular triggers (DAMPs, oxidized lipids, crystalline edges, or lysosomal rupture) that activate the AM inflammasome and the Nrf2?
Can we map exposure-specific AM phenotypes to distinct tissue remodeling outcomes (fibrosis vs. repair vs. emphysema) using spatial transcriptomics and single-cell proteomics?
What are the mechanisms by which influenza A infection perturbs AM homeostasis and surfactant integrity, and how can AM-targeted strategies preserve antiviral defense while limiting tissue injury?
How do co-exposures (environmental agent plus Mycoplasma pneumoniae or Klebsiella pneumoniae infection) reshape AM polarization, inflammasome activation, efferocytosis, and MET formation?
Are there pathogen-specific AM subpopulations (e.g., PD-L1high, ROShigh, SPMhigh) that emerge only under certain host–pathogen–exposure combinations, and can they be therapeutically targeted?
Which single-cell and spatial-OMICS signatures best predict transition from acute exposure/infection to chronic lung remodeling, and how can these be translated to clinical biomarkers?
Conclusions
In conclusion, AM play a pivotal role in the lung’s defense, responding dynamically to an ever-widening array of environmental agents and pathogens. Repeated or co-exposures to coal dust and other respirable particles can skew AM toward pro-inflammatory or pro-fibrotic states, impairing surfactant recycling, efferocytosis and bacterial killing. Likewise, M. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 deploy toxins, lipoproteins, and LPS-rich outer-membrane vesicles to subvert phagolysosomal fusion, induce oxidative stress, and trigger inflammasome-driven pyroptosis. The net result is a dysregulated macrophage phenotype that fuels chronic inflammation, compromises barrier integrity, and propels diseases such as asthma exacerbation, COPD, organizing pneumonia, and pulmonary fibrosis.
Glossary with Description of Some Abbreviations
| Abbreviation | Meaning | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ABCA1 / ABCG1 | ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 | It is involved in lipid export from macrophages. |
| AP-1 | Activator Protein-1 | A transcription factor, Stimulates inflammatory and stress responses. |
| AREG | Amphiregulin | It is an epidermal growth factor, which is crucial for cell growth, differentiation and tissue repair. |
| ASC specks | Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein | Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; adaptor protein oligomers that scaffold active inflammasomes |
| ATG | Autophagy-related protein | It regulates formation and maturation of autophagosomes. |
| C1q a/b/c | Subunits of complement component C1q | Important in recognition and clearance of apoptotic cells and immune complexes. |
| Cathepsin B / L | Lysosomal proteases B and L | Implicated in phagolysosomal digestion and NLRP3 activation after lysosomal damage. |
| CCL22 | C-C chemokine ligand 22 | Chemokine often associated with regulatory/T-helper 2 recruitment |
| CCL5 | C-C chemokine ligand 5 | Also called RANTES, Chemokine recruiting T cells, monocytes and NK cells. |
| CD11b | Cluster of differentiation 11b | Integrin α M (ITGAM), marker of recruited/inflammatory myeloid cells and phagocytic activity. |
| CD11c | Cluster of differentiation 11c | Integrin alpha X (ITGAX), A myeloid integrin highly expressed on tissue macrophages and dendritic cells; associated with phagocytosis and adhesion. |
| CD14 | Cluster of differentiation 14 | Co-receptor for LPS (lipopolysaccharide). |
| CD16 | Cluster of differentiation 16 | marker distinguishing monocyte subsets (CD14+/CD16+) |
| CD163 | Cluster of differentiation 200 | Scavenger receptors expressed on AM and help in clearance of Hemoglobin-haptoglobin complexes. |
| CD169 | Cluster of differentiation 169 | Sialoadhesin (SIGLEC1), A macrophage lectin implicated in cell–cell interactions and antigen capture. |
| CD200 | Cluster of differentiation 200 | Type I transmembrane glycoprotein, acts as an inhibitory signal to AM. |
| CD200R | Cluster of differentiation 200 receptor | Inhibitory receptor expressed on alveolar epithelial cells that bind to CD200 to suppress macrophages activation. |
| CD206 | Cluster of differentiation 200 | Mannose Receptor (MRC1); function as endocytic receptor, mainly expressed on M2 macrophages and help in resolution of inflammation. |
| CD300b | Cluster of differentiation 300b | Receptors help in clearance of apoptotic cells. |
| CD36 | Cluster of differentiation 36 | Act as scavenger receptor for fatty acids, oxidized lipid and pathogens and help in platelets activation. |
| CD38 | Cluster of differentiation 38 | Ecto-enzyme and activation marker associated with inflammation and NAD+ metabolism; marks activated macrophages. |
| CD4+ T cells | Cluster of differentiation 4 expressing T cells | Helper T cells, crucial cells of immune system that shape adaptive immune responses by signaling B cells macrophages and CD8 T cells. |
| CD8+ T cell | Cluster of differentiation 8 expressing T cells | Cytotoxic T lymphocyte, crucial cells of adaptive immune system, which directly kill pathogens by identifying them through MHC, I molecules. |
| CD80 | Cluster of Differentiation 80 B7-1 | T-cell costimulatory ligand expressed on activated antigen-presenting cells; upregulated on pro-inflammatory macrophages to enhance T-cell activation. |
| CD86 | Cluster of Differentiation 86 (B7-2) | Partner costimulatory molecule similar function to CD80. |
| CXCL8 (IL-8) | C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 | Key neutrophil chemoattractant. |
| DAMPs | Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns | Endogenous molecules released by stressed or dying cells (e.g., mitochondrial DNA, ATP) that activate innate immune receptors and inflammasomes. |
| DC-SIGN | Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular adhesion molecule-3 | Grabbing Non-integrin (CD209). A C-type lectin implicated in pathogen binding. |
| Dimethyl Itaconate | Dimethyl Itaconate | A synthetic derivative of itaconate used to modulate macrophage metabolism and inflammatory responses. |
| Ferruginous Bodies | Ferruginous Bodies | Iron-protein coated asbestos fibers found in lung tissues, indicative of asbestos exposure and associated with fibrosis. |
| FOXO3 / p53 | Forkhead Box O3 | Regulators of stress responses, senescence and apoptosis. |
| GSDMD | Gasdermin D | Components of pyroptotic cell-death pathway release IL-1β/IL-18 and amplify inflammation. |
| H3K4me3 | Histone H3 Lysine 4 Trimethylation | Epigenetic activation mark |
| HDAC2 | Histone Deacetylase 2 | An epigenetic regulator whose loss contributes to chronic inflammation and steroid resistance in diseases like COPD. |
| HIF-1α | Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α | Coordinates glycolytic and inflammatory responses under hypoxia. |
| HMGB1 | High mobility group box 1 | A DAMP released by dying or stressed cells. |
| HO-1 | Heme oxygenase-1 | Antioxidant enzyme, key in heme/iron handling and antioxidant responses. |
| IL-10 | Interleukin-10 | Anti-inflammatory cytokine promoting resolution. |
| IL-1β | Interleukin-1 beta | Pro-inflammatory cytokine processed by caspase-1. |
| IL-6 | Interleukin-6 | Promotes acute-phase responses, systemic inflammation, and immune cell recruitment. |
| IRF3 / IRF4 | Interferon regulatory factors 3/4 | Involved in antiviral (IRF3) and alternative activation / tolerance (IRF4) programs. |
| IRF3 / IRF7 | Interferon regulatory factors 3/7 | Interferon regulatory factors driving type I IFN gene transcription after viral sensing (critical for IFN-α/β production). |
| ISG15 | Interferon-stimulated gene 15 | Ubiquitin-like modifier induced by type I IFNs with antiviral roles. |
| KRT79 | Keratin 79 | Epithelial marker; occasional detection may reflect epithelial–macrophage interactions or contamination in transcriptomes. |
| MAPK | Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase | A signaling cascade involving p38, JNK, and ERK pathways that regulate inflammation and macrophage activation. |
| MARCO | Macrophage Receptor with Collagenous Structure | A scavenger receptor for bacteria and particulates. |
| MerTK | MER proto-oncogene, tyrosine kinase | It is highly expressed on macrophages and help in efferocytosis. |
| METs | Macrophage Extracellular Traps | Fibrous structures composed of DNA and antimicrobial proteins expelled by macrophages to trap pathogens. |
| MHC I | Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I | Important molecule of immune system, which expressed antigen presenting, cells and displays internal cell antigen to cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CD8) for the T cell activation. |
| MHCII | Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II | Expressed on antigen presenting cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells and present exogenous antigen to CD4 T cells. |
| MMP | Matrix metalloproteinases | Remodel extracellular matrix; contribute to tissue remodeling and pathology. |
| MyD88 | Myeloid differentiation primary response 88 | An adaptor for most TLRs driving NF-κβ activation. |
| NETosis | Neutrophil Extracellular Traps formation | The process by which neutrophils release extracellular traps to entrap pathogens. |
| NFATc1 | Nuclear factor of activated T cells, c1 | Implicated in macrophage fusion and giant cell formation. |
| NLRP3 | Inflammasome | A multiprotein complex in macrophages that activates caspase-1 to process IL-1β and IL-18, inducing inflammatory responses and pyroptosis. |
| NLRP3 | NOD-like receptor protein 3 Inflammasome | Multiprotein sensor complex that activates caspase-1 to process IL-1β/IL-18 and trigger pyroptosis. |
| NRF2 | Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2–Related Factor 2 | Master transcriptional regulator of antioxidant and detoxification genes. |
| OAS1 | 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase 1 | ISG that activates RNase L antiviral pathway. OH−: Hydroxyl radical |
| OmpA | Outer membrane protein A | Found on outer membrane of many gram-negative bacteria and act as a channel for small nutrients. |
| P2X7 | Purinergic Receptors | Receptors activated by extracellular ATP that can trigger inflammasome activation and inflammatory responses. |
| PD-L1 | Programmed Death Ligand-1 | An inhibitory checkpoint ligand that dampens T-cell responses. |
| PGE2 | Prostaglandin E2 | Lipid mediator with immunomodulatory roles. |
| Plet1 | Placenta-expressed transcript 1 | It plays role in tissue repair and wound healing. |
| PLIN2 | Perilipin-2 | Lipid droplet coat protein |
| PPARγ | Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma | Regulates lipid metabolism and ant-inflammatory programs in macrophages. |
| S100A8/A9 | Calprotectin subunits (S100 proteins) | DAMPs and pro-inflammatory mediators released by myeloid cells. |
| SASP factors | Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype | Senescent cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines and proteases (IL-6, CCL2, MMPs). |
| Siglec-8 | Sialic acid-binding Immunoglobulin-like Lectin 8 | A lectin family receptor involved in recognition of sialylated glycans; Siglec-F is the murine analog. |
| SIRPα | Signal regulatory protein alpha | Binds CD47 and transmits “don’t eat me” signals; regulates phagocytosis. |
| STAT1 / STAT3 / STAT6 | Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1/3/6 | Key mediators of IFN, IL-10, and IL-4/IL-13 signaling, respectively. |
| TLR7 / TLR8 | Toll-like receptors 7 and 8 | Endosomal sensors for single-stranded RNA that trigger type I IFN and inflammatory signaling in myeloid cells. |
| TNF-α | Tumor necrosis factor α | Potent pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in cell activation, vascular effects, and recruitment. |
| VEGF | Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor | Pro-angiogenic factor. |
| VSP34 | Vacuolar protein sorting 34 | Class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. |
Clinical Highlights (Call-Out Box for Clinicians).
Alveolar macrophages are central components of lung defense, repair, and remodeling. Their ability to transform from proinflammatory to pro-resolving states plays a vital role in defending the lungs from external environmental agents and pathogens and initiating tissue repair.
AM clear apoptotic cells and debris which minimizes pro-fibrotic signaling and enhance repair
Dysregulated AM responses contribute to COPD progression, pneumoconiosis/fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, decreased surfactant clearance and susceptibility to secondary infections due to impaired phagocytosis/efferocytosis or altered surfactant turnover.
Surfactant proteins A and D work in unison with AM to phagocytose and pathogens
Acknowledgement
S.M, J.K, and S.D were supported by 2 R01 HL031197 and a supplement to this grant from NHLBI as well as from a REINVENT grant from the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine from the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Graphical abstract and other figures created with a licensed version of Biorender.com. We would like to thank Dr. Lee Ann Riesenberg for editing the manuscript.
Glossary
- ADRP
Adipocyte Differentiation-Related Protein
- ALI
Acute Lung Injury
- APCs
Antigen-Presenting Cells
- ARG1
Arginase-1
- BMDM
Bone marrow derive macrophage
- Car4
Carbonic Anhydrase 4
- Caspase-1
Cysteine-aspartic protease 1
- CCR1
C-C chemokine receptor type 1
- CCR3
C-C chemokine receptor type 3
- CD68
Glycoprotein macrophage marker
- cGAS
Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase
- CHIL3 (YM1)
Chitinase-Like Protein 3 (mouse Ym1)
- CPS
Capsular polysaccharides
- CREB
cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein
- CXCL1
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1
- CXCL9
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9
- Ear1
Eosinophil-associated ribonuclease 1
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- ETC
Electron transport chain
- FAS
Fatty acids synthesis
- FcγR
Fc gamma receptors
- GAS6
Growth Arrest-Specific protein 6
- GSH
Glutathione, Major intracellular antioxidant tripeptide
- IFN-α/β
Type I interferons
- ILC2
Innate lymphoid cells type II
- IRF1
Interferon Regulatory Factor 1
- ITGAX
Integrin alpha X gene
- KP
Klebsiella pneumoniae
- LAP
LC3-mediated phagocytosis
- LMW-HA
Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronan
- LPS
Lipopolysaccharide
- Ly6c2/Ly6C
Lymphocyte Antigen 6 Complex, locus C2 (mouse monocyte marker)
- MD-2
Myeloid differentiation factor 2
- MDSCs
Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
- MKI67 (Mki67)
Marker of Proliferation Ki-67
- MPO
Myeloperoxidase
- mtROS
Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species
- NETs
Neutrophil Extracellular Traps
- NO·.
Nitric oxide
- O2−
Superoxide
- ONOO−
Peroxynitrite
- p53
Tumor Protein p53
- PDGF
Platelet-derived growth factor. Mitogenic and pro-fibrotic mediator
- PI3K
Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase
- PM
Particulate matters
- Pro-IL-1β
Precursor Interleukin-1 beta
- Prussian blue+
Positive iron stain (ferric iron deposits)
- RelA
NF-κβ p65
- RNS
Reactive nitrogen species
- RUNX1
Runt-Related Transcription Factor 1
- SiglecF
Sialic acid-binding Immunoglobulin-like Lectin F (mouse)
- SP-A and SP-D
Surfactant Protein-A / Surfactant Protein- D
- STAT
Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription
- T6SS
Type 6-secretion-system
- TGF-α
Transforming Growth Factor Alpha
- TGFβR
Transforming growth factor-beta receptor
- TIM-4
T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein-4
- TLR2 / TLR4
Toll-like receptor 2 / Toll-like receptor 4
- TOP2A
DNA Topoisomerase II Alpha
- TREM2
Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2
- UVRAG
UV radiation resistance-associated gene
- VSP-15
Vacuolar protein sorting-15
- AEC
Alveolar epithelial cell
- AM
Alveolar Macrophages
- ARDS
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- BACH2
BTB and CNC Homology 1, Basic Leucine Zipper Transcription Factor 2
- C5aR1 (C5ar1)
Complement Component 5a Receptor 1
- CARDS
Community-Acquired Respiratory Distress Syndrome toxin
- CCL2 (MCP-1)
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- CCR2 (Ccr2+)
C-C Chemokine Receptor 2
- CCR7
C-C Chemokine Receptor 7
- CFTR
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
- CHI3L1 (CHI3L1/YKL-40)
Chitinase-like protein implicated in remodeling and fibrosis
- Cholesteryl esters
Stored cholesterol derivatives
- CR3
Complement receptor 3
- CS
Cigarette smoke
- CXCL10
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10
- DCs
Dendritic Cells
- ELF
Epithelial lining fluid
- ENAC
Epithelial Sodium Channel
- EVALI
E-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury
- FAO
Fatty Acid Oxidation
- Ferritin
Iron storage protein
- GM-CSF
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
- IFN
Interferon
- IGF-1
Insulin-like Growth Factor 1
- iNOS (NOS2)
Inducible nitric oxide synthase
- IRF8
Interferon Regulatory Factor 8
- KLF4
Krüppel-Like Factor 4
- LANDO
LC3-associated endocytosis
- LC3
Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3
- LPP
Lipid peroxidation product
- LXR-α
Liver X Receptor alpha (NR1H3)
- Lysozyme
Antimicrobial muramidase enzyme
- MDA-5
Melanoma Differentiation-Associated gene 5
- OXPHOS
Oxidative phosphorylation
- MP
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
- MR
Mannose receptor
- NADPH
Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate
- NF-κβ
Nuclear factor kappa β
- NOX2
NADPH Oxidase
- OH−
Hydroxyl radical
- OxPL
Oxidized phospholipid
- PAMPs
Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns
- PF4
Platelet Factor 4
- PKR
Protein kinase R
- PPP
Pentose phosphate pathway
- PRRs
Pattern Recognition Receptors
- PtdSer
Phosphatidylserine
- RIG-1
Retinoic acid-inducible gene I
- ROS
Reactive Oxygen Species
- SA-β-gal+
Senescence-Associated beta-Galactosidase positive
- SMAD2/3
Intracellular mediators of TGF-β signaling (pro-fibrotic programs)
- SREBP-1c
Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein-1c (SREBF1)
- STING
Stimulator of interferon Genes
- TCA
Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle
- TGF-β
Transforming Growth Factor-beta
- Th1
Helper T cells
- TLR3
Toll-like receptor 3
- TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor α
- Treg
Regulatory T cells
- TRPV4
Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4
- VEGF- α
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Footnotes
Disclosures
Dr. Sadis Matalon is the Editor in Chief of Physiological Reviews, for which he receives an honorarium from the American Physiological Society. He certifies that he was in no way involved in the review process and the final editorial decision of this manuscript. No other conflicts exist.
References
- 1.Xiao J, Hou F, Wang H, Wang R, Liu Y, Wu X, Xie L. Monocyte-Derived Macrophages Induce Alveolar Macrophages Death via TNF-α in Acute Lung Injury. Immunity Inflam & Disease 12: e70081, 2024. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aegerter H, Lambrecht BN, Jakubzick CV. Biology of lung macrophages in health and disease. Immunity 55: 1564–1580, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.T’Jonck W, Bain CC. The role of monocyte-derived macrophages in the lung: It’s all about context. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 159: 106421, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2023.106421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bain CC, MacDonald AS. The impact of the lung environment on macrophage development, activation and function: diversity in the face of adversity. Mucosal Immunology 15: 223–234, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41385-021-00480-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Evren E, Ringqvist E, Willinger T. Origin and ontogeny of lung macrophages: from mice to humans. Immunology 160: 126–138, 2020. doi: 10.1111/imm.13154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McQuattie-Pimentel AC, Budinger GRS, Ballinger MN. Monocyte-derived Alveolar Macrophages: The Dark Side of Lung Repair? Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 58: 5–6, 2018. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0328ED. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hou F, Shi N, Yuan H, Li B, Xiao J, Xiao K, Xie L. Targeting alveolar macrophages: a promising intervention for pulmonary infection and acute lung injury. Cell Mol Biol Lett 30: 69, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s11658-025-00750-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Malainou C, Abdin SM, Lachmann N, Matt U, Herold S. Alveolar macrophages in tissue homeostasis, inflammation, and infection: evolving concepts of therapeutic targeting. Journal of Clinical Investigation 133: e170501, 2023. doi: 10.1172/JCI170501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reyfman PA, Walter JM, Joshi N, Anekalla KR, McQuattie-Pimentel AC, Chiu S, Fernandez R, Akbarpour M, Chen C-I, Ren Z, Verma R, Abdala-Valencia H, Nam K, Chi M, Han S, Gonzalez-Gonzalez FJ, Soberanes S, Watanabe S, Williams KJN, Flozak AS, Nicholson TT, Morgan VK, Winter DR, Hinchcliff M, Hrusch CL, Guzy RD, Bonham CA, Sperling AI, Bag R, Hamanaka RB, Mutlu GM, Yeldandi AV, Marshall SA, Shilatifard A, Amaral LAN, Perlman H, Sznajder JI, Argento AC, Gillespie CT, Dematte J, Jain M, Singer BD, Ridge KM, Lam AP, Bharat A, Bhorade SM, Gottardi CJ, Budinger GRS, Misharin AV. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Lung Provides Insights into the Pathobiology of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199: 1517–1536, 2019. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201712-2410OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.De Zuani M, Xue H, Park JS, Dentro SC, Seferbekova Z, Tessier J, Curras-Alonso S, Hadjipanayis A, Athanasiadis EI, Gerstung M, Bayraktar O, Cvejic A. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics analysis of non-small cell lung cancer. Nat Commun 15: 4388, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48700-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gu Y, Lawrence T, Mohamed R, Liang Y, Yahaya BH. The emerging roles of interstitial macrophages in pulmonary fibrosis: A perspective from scRNA-seq analyses. Front Immunol 13: 923235, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.923235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Murray PJ, Allen JE, Biswas SK, Fisher EA, Gilroy DW, Goerdt S, Gordon S, Hamilton JA, Ivashkiv LB, Lawrence T, Locati M, Mantovani A, Martinez FO, Mege J-L, Mosser DM, Natoli G, Saeij JP, Schultze JL, Shirey KA, Sica A, Suttles J, Udalova I, van Ginderachter JA, Vogel SN, Wynn TA. Macrophage Activation and Polarization: Nomenclature and Experimental Guidelines. Immunity 41: 14–20, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mantovani A, Biswas SK, Galdiero MR, Sica A, Locati M. Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling. J Pathol 229: 176–185, 2013. doi: 10.1002/path.4133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Murray PJ. Macrophage Polarization. Annu Rev Physiol 79: 541–566, 2017. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma Q, Lim CS. Molecular Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome by Particles and Crystals: A Continuing Challenge of Immunology and Toxicology. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 64: 417–433, 2024. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-031023-125300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim S-K. The Mechanism of the NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Pathogenic Implication in the Pathogenesis of Gout. J Rheum Dis 29: 140–153, 2022. doi: 10.4078/jrd.2022.29.3.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jo E-K, Kim JK, Shin D-M, Sasakawa C. Molecular mechanisms regulating NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Cell Mol Immunol 13: 148–159, 2016. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kawasaki T, Kawai T. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front Immunol 5: 461, 2014. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duan T, Du Y, Xing C, Wang HY, Wang R-F. Toll-Like Receptor Signaling and Its Role in Cell-Mediated Immunity. Front Immunol 13: 812774, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.812774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep 6, 2014. doi: 10.12703/P6-13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lawrence T, Natoli G. Transcriptional regulation of macrophage polarization: enabling diversity with identity. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 750–761, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nri3088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liongue C, Ward AC. Evolution of the JAK-STAT pathway. JAKSTAT 2: e22756, 2013. doi: 10.4161/jkst.22756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Subramani A, Hite MEL, Garcia S, Maxwell J, Kondee H, Millican GE, McClelland EE, Seipelt-Thiemann RL, Nelson DE. Regulation of macrophage IFNγ-stimulated gene expression by the transcriptional coregulator CITED1. J Cell Sci 136, 2023. doi: 10.1242/jcs.260529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li L, Chen S-F, Liu Y. MAP kinase phosphatase-1, a critical negative regulator of the innate immune response. Int J Clin Exp Med 2: 48–67, 2009. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hu X, Ivashkiv LB. Cross-regulation of signaling pathways by interferon-gamma: implications for immune responses and autoimmune diseases. Immunity 31: 539–550, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Platanias LC. Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 375–386, 2005. doi: 10.1038/nri1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Darnell JEJ. STATs and gene regulation. Science 277: 1630–1635, 1997. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5332.1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Levy DE, Darnell JE. STATs: transcriptional control and biological impact. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 3: 651–662, 2002. doi: 10.1038/nrm909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Durbin JE, Hackenmiller R, Simon MC, Levy DE. Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat1 gene results in compromised innate immunity to viral disease. Cell 84: 443–450, 1996. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81289-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Regulation of NF-κB by TNF family cytokines. Semin Immunol 26: 253–266, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li H, Jiang T, Li M-Q, Zheng X-L, Zhao G-J. Transcriptional Regulation of Macrophages Polarization by MicroRNAs. Frontiers in Immunology Volume 9-2018, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Antonczyk A, Krist B, Sajek M, Michalska A, Piaszyk-Borychowska A, Plens-Galaska M, Wesoly J, Bluyssen HAR. Direct Inhibition of IRF-Dependent Transcriptional Regulatory Mechanisms Associated With Disease. Front Immunol 10: 1176, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.AL Hamrashdi M, Brady G. Regulation of IRF3 activation in human antiviral signaling pathways. Biochemical Pharmacology 200: 115026, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhou Q, Lavorgna A, Bowman M, Hiscott J, Harhaj EW. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Interacting Protein Targets IRF7 to Suppress Antiviral Signaling and the Induction of Type I Interferon. J Biol Chem 290: 14729–14739, 2015. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.633065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Platanitis E, Decker T. Regulatory Networks Involving STATs, IRFs, and NFκB in Inflammation. Front Immunol 9: 2542, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Clark K, Takeuchi O, Akira S, Cohen P. The TRAF-associated protein TANK facilitates cross-talk within the IkappaB kinase family during Toll-like receptor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 17093–17098, 2011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114194108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cheon H, Holvey-Bates EG, Schoggins JW, Forster S, Hertzog P, Imanaka N, Rice CM, Jackson MW, Junk DJ, Stark GR. IFNβ-dependent increases in STAT1, STAT2, and IRF9 mediate resistance to viruses and DNA damage. The EMBO Journal 32: 2751–2763, 2013. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mattner J, Schindler H, Diefenbach A, Röllinghoff M, Gresser I, Bogdan C. Regulation of type 2 nitric oxide synthase by type 1 interferons in macrophages infected with Leishmania major. Eur J Immunol 30: 2257–2267, 2000. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(2000)30:8<2257::AID-IMMU2257>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.DebRoy A, Vogel SM, Soni D, Sundivakkam PC, Malik AB, Tiruppathi C. Cooperative signaling via transcription factors NF-κB and AP1/c-Fos mediates endothelial cell STIM1 expression and hyperpermeability in response to endotoxin. J Biol Chem 289: 24188–24201, 2014. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.570051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen Y, Yue S, Yu L, Cao J, Liu Y, Deng A, Lu Y, Yang J, Li H, Du J, Xia J, Li Y, Xia Y. Regulation and Function of the cGAS-STING Pathway: Mechanisms, Post-Translational Modifications, and Therapeutic Potential in Immunotherapy. Drug Des Devel Ther 19: 1721–1739, 2025. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S501773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Burdette DL, Monroe KM, Sotelo-Troha K, Iwig JS, Eckert B, Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y, Vance RE. STING is a direct innate immune sensor of cyclic di-GMP. Nature 478: 515–518, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nature10429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gao D, Wu J, Wu Y-T, Du F, Aroh C, Yan N, Sun L, Chen ZJ. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is an innate immune sensor of HIV and other retroviruses. Science 341: 903–906, 2013. doi: 10.1126/science.1240933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yum S, Li M, Fang Y, Chen ZJ. TBK1 recruitment to STING activates both IRF3 and NF-κB that mediate immune defense against tumors and viral infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118, 2021. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100225118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tanaka Y, Chen ZJ. STING specifies IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1 in the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway. Sci Signal 5: ra20, 2012. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pelegrin P, Surprenant A. Pannexin-1 mediates large pore formation and interleukin-1beta release by the ATP-gated P2X7 receptor. EMBO J 25: 5071–5082, 2006. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Guo H, Callaway JB, Ting JP- Y. Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat Med 21: 677–687, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nm.3893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang K, Shi X, Wang Y, Huang H, Zhuang Y, Cai T, Wang F, Shao F. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature 526: 660–665, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nature15514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Man SM, Karki R, Kanneganti T-D. Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis, inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes in infectious diseases. Immunol Rev 277: 61–75, 2017. doi: 10.1111/imr.12534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rock KL, Latz E, Ontiveros F, Kono H. The sterile inflammatory response. Annu Rev Immunol 28: 321–342, 2010. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.O’Neill LAJ, Pearce EJ. Immunometabolism governs dendritic cell and macrophage function. Journal of Experimental Medicine 213: 15–23, 2016. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends in Immunology 25: 677–686, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen X, Tang J, Shuai W, Meng J, Feng J, Han Z. Macrophage polarization and its role in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Inflamm Res 69: 883–895, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s00011-020-01378-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Goodman RB, Pugin J, Lee JS, Matthay MA. Cytokine-mediated inflammation in acute lung injury. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 14: 523–535, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6101(03)00059-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bhatia M, Moochhala S. Role of inflammatory mediators in the pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Journal of Pathology 202: 145–156, 2004. doi: 10.1002/path.1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Al Mamun A, Ngwa C, Qi S, Honarpisheh P, Datar S, Sharmeen R, Xu Y, McCullough LD, Liu F. Neuronal CD200 Signaling Is Protective in the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 52: 3362–3373, 2021. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ngwa C, Liu F. CD200-CD200R signaling and diseases: a potential therapeutic target? Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol 11: 297–309, 2019. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nip C, Wang L, Liu C. CD200/CD200R: Bidirectional Role in Cancer Progression and Immunotherapy. Biomedicines 11: 3326, 2023. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11123326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rasheed A, Rayner KJ. Macrophage Responses to Environmental Stimuli During Homeostasis and Disease. Endocrine Reviews 42: 407–435, 2021. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnab004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gordon S, Martinez FO. Alternative Activation of Macrophages: Mechanism and Functions. Immunity 32: 593–604, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tugal D, Liao X, Jain MK. Transcriptional Control of Macrophage Polarization. ATVB 33: 1135–1144, 2013. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Waqas SFH, Ampem G, Röszer T. Analysis of IL-4/STAT6 Signaling in Macrophages. In: Nuclear Receptors, edited by Badr MZ. Springer; New York, p. 211–224. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Odegaard JI, Chawla A. Alternative Macrophage Activation and Metabolism. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis 6: 275–297, 2011. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest 122: 787–795, 2012. doi: 10.1172/JCI59643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Desgeorges T, Caratti G, Mounier R, Tuckermann J, Chazaud B. Glucocorticoids Shape Macrophage Phenotype for Tissue Repair. Front Immunol 10: 1591, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Žaloudíková M Mechanisms and Effects of Macrophage Polarization and Its Specifics in Pulmonary Environment. . [Google Scholar]
- 66.Xue J, Schmidt SV, Sander J, Draffehn A, Krebs W, Quester I, De Nardo D, Gohel TD, Emde M, Schmidleithner L, Ganesan H, Nino-Castro A, Mallmann MR, Labzin L, Theis H, Kraut M, Beyer M, Latz E, Freeman TC, Ulas T, Schultze JL. Transcriptome-Based Network Analysis Reveals a Spectrum Model of Human Macrophage Activation. Immunity 40: 274–288, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nature Reviews Immunology 8: 958–969, 2008. doi: 10.1038/nri2448. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mills CD, Kincaid K, Alt JM, Heilman MJ, Hill AM. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol 164: 6166–6173, 2000. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hochreiter-Hufford A, Ravichandran KS. Clearing the Dead: Apoptotic Cell Sensing, Recognition, Engulfment, and Digestion. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 5: a008748–a008748, 2013. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mantovani A, Marchesi F, Malesci A, Laghi L, Allavena P. Tumour-associated macrophages as treatment targets in oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14: 399–416, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Liu C, Xiao K, Xie L. Advances in the Regulation of Macrophage Polarization by Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Implications for ALI/ARDS Treatment. Front Immunol 13: 928134, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.928134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chen S, Saeed AFUH, Liu Q, Jiang Q, Xu H, Xiao GG, Rao L, Duo Y. Macrophages in immunoregulation and therapeutics. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 8: 207, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zhao W, Beers DR, Thonhoff JR, Thome AD, Faridar A, Wang J, Wen S, Ornelas L, Sareen D, Goodridge HS, Svendsen CN, Appel SH. Immunosuppressive Functions of M2 Macrophages Derived from iPSCs of Patients with ALS and Healthy Controls. iScience 23: 101192, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Van Den Bossche J, O’Neill LA, Menon D. Macrophage Immunometabolism: Where Are We (Going)? Trends in Immunology 38: 395–406, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Vats D, Mukundan L, Odegaard JI, Zhang L, Smith KL, Morel CR, Greaves DR, Murray PJ, Chawla A. Oxidative metabolism and PGC-1β attenuate macrophage-mediated inflammation. Cell Metabolism 4: 13–24, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 723–737, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nri3073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in Tissue Repair, Regeneration, and Fibrosis. Immunity 44: 450–462, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Vandivier RW, Henson PM, Douglas IS. Burying the dead: the impact of failed apoptotic cell removal (efferocytosis) on chronic inflammatory lung disease. Chest 129: 1673–1682, 2006. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Herold S, Mayer K, Lohmeyer J. Acute lung injury: how macrophages orchestrate resolution of inflammation and tissue repair. Front Immunol 2: 65, 2011. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Byrne AJ, Maher TM, Lloyd CM. Pulmonary Macrophages: A New Therapeutic Pathway in Fibrosing Lung Disease? Trends in Molecular Medicine 22: 303–316, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.McCormick SM, Gowda N, Fang JX, Heller NM. Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS)1 Regulates Interleukin-4 (IL-4)-activated Insulin Receptor Substrate (IRS)-2 Tyrosine Phosphorylation in Monocytes and Macrophages via the Proteasome. J Biol Chem 291: 20574–20587, 2016. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.746164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Huang S, Zhu B, Cheon IS, Goplen NP, Jiang L, Zhang R, Peebles RS, Mack M, Kaplan MH, Limper AH, Sun J. PPAR-γ in Macrophages Limits Pulmonary Inflammation and Promotes Host Recovery following Respiratory Viral Infection. J Virol 93, 2019. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00030-19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Liu Y, Li X, Yang Y. BACH1 transcriptionally upregulates FOSL2 to induce M2 macrophages phenotype by activating TGFβ/SMAD signaling to promote the transformation of lung fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. Tissue Cell 88: 102407, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2024.102407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Liu G, Abraham E. MicroRNAs in Immune Response and Macrophage Polarization. ATVB 33: 170–177, 2013. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.O’Connell RM, Rao DS, Baltimore D. microRNA regulation of inflammatory responses. Annu Rev Immunol 30: 295–312, 2012. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Serhan CN, Chiang N, Van Dyke TE. Resolving inflammation: dual anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution lipid mediators. Nature Reviews Immunology 8: 349–361, 2008. doi: 10.1038/nri2294. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Basil MC, Levy BD. Specialized pro-resolving mediators: endogenous regulators of infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 16: 51–67, 2016. doi: 10.1038/nri.2015.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Serhan CN, Levy BD. Resolvins in inflammation: emergence of the pro-resolving superfamily of mediators. Journal of Clinical Investigation 128: 2657–2669, 2018. doi: 10.1172/JCI97943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Mann R, Stavrou V, Dimeloe S. NAD + metabolism and function in innate and adaptive immune cells. J Inflamm (Lond) 22: 30, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s12950-025-00457-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Janssen WJ, McPhillips KA, Dickinson MG, Linderman DJ, Morimoto K, Xiao YQ, Oldham KM, Vandivier RW, Henson PM, Gardai SJ. Surfactant proteins A and D suppress alveolar macrophage phagocytosis via interaction with SIRP alpha. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 178: 158–167, 2008. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200711-1661OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Watson A, Madsen J, Clark HW. SP-A and SP-D: Dual Functioning Immune Molecules With Antiviral and Immunomodulatory Properties. Frontiers in Immunology Volume 11-2020, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.622598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wynn TA, Ramalingam TR. Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat Med 18: 1028–1040, 2012. doi: 10.1038/nm.2807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wynn TA, Barron L. Macrophages: master regulators of inflammation and fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis 30: 245–257, 2010. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bystrom J, Evans I, Newson J, Stables M, Toor I, Van Rooijen N, Crawford M, Colville-Nash P, Farrow S, Gilroy DW. Resolution-phase macrophages possess a unique inflammatory phenotype that is controlled by cAMP. Blood 112: 4117–4127, 2008. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-12-129767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Brancewicz J, Wójcik N, Sarnowska Z, Robak J, Król M. The Multifaceted Role of Macrophages in Biology and Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 26, 2025. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Prieto P, Rosales-Mendoza CE, Terrón V, Toledano V, Cuadrado A, López-Collazo E, Bannenberg G, Martín-Sanz P, Fernández-Velasco M, Boscá L. Activation of autophagy in macrophages by pro-resolving lipid mediators. Autophagy 11: 1729–1744, 2015. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1078958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wang C, Zhao M, Bin P, Ye Y, Chen Q, Tang Z, Ren W. Serine synthesis controls mitochondrial biogenesis in macrophages. Sci Adv 10: eadn2867, 2024. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn2867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Dalli J, Serhan CN. Pro-Resolving Mediators in Regulating and Conferring Macrophage Function. Front Immunol 8: 1400, 2017. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ariel A, Serhan CN. New Lives Given by Cell Death: Macrophage Differentiation Following Their Encounter with Apoptotic Leukocytes during the Resolution of Inflammation. Front Immunol 3: 4, 2012. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Schif-Zuck S, Gross N, Assi S, Rostoker R, Serhan CN, Ariel A. Saturated-efferocytosis generates pro-resolving CD11b low macrophages: modulation by resolvins and glucocorticoids. Eur J Immunol 41: 366–379, 2011. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Stables MJ, Shah S, Camon EB, Lovering RC, Newson J, Bystrom J, Farrow S, Gilroy DW. Transcriptomic analyses of murine resolution-phase macrophages. Blood 118: e192–208, 2011. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-345330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.A-Gonzalez N, Bensinger SJ, Hong C, Beceiro S, Bradley MN, Zelcer N, Deniz J, Ramirez C, Díaz M, Gallardo G, de Galarreta CR, Salazar J, Lopez F, Edwards P, Parks J, Andujar M, Tontonoz P, Castrillo A. Apoptotic cells promote their own clearance and immune tolerance through activation of the nuclear receptor LXR. Immunity 31: 245–258, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Leroy V, Manual Kollareth DJ, Tu Z, Valisno JAC, Woolet-Stockton M, Saha B, Emtiazjoo AM, Rackauskas M, Moldawer LL, Efron PA, Cai G, Atkinson C, Upchurch GRJ, Sharma AK. MerTK-dependent efferocytosis by monocytic-MDSCs mediates resolution of ischemia/reperfusion injury after lung transplant. JCI Insight 9, 2024. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.179876. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.de Couto G, Jaghatspanyan E, DeBerge M, Liu W, Luther K, Wang Y, Tang J, Thorp EB, Marbán E. Mechanism of Enhanced MerTK-Dependent Macrophage Efferocytosis by Extracellular Vesicles. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 39: 2082–2096, 2019. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Hong C, Walczak R, Dhamko H, Bradley MN, Marathe C, Boyadjian R, Salazar JV, Tontonoz P. Constitutive activation of LXR in macrophages regulates metabolic and inflammatory gene expression: identification of ARL7 as a direct target. J Lipid Res 52: 531–539, 2011. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M010686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Hanna RN, Shaked I, Hubbeling HG, Punt JA, Wu R, Herrley E, Zaugg C, Pei H, Geissmann F, Ley K, Hedrick CC. NR4A1 (Nur77) deletion polarizes macrophages toward an inflammatory phenotype and increases atherosclerosis. Circ Res 110: 416–427, 2012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.253377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Wang N, Liang H, Zen K. Molecular mechanisms that influence the macrophage m1-m2 polarization balance. Front Immunol 5: 614, 2014. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Yvan-Charvet L, Wang N, Tall AR. Role of HDL, ABCA1, and ABCG1 transporters in cholesterol efflux and immune responses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30: 139–143, 2010. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Karunakaran D, Thrush AB, Nguyen M-A, Richards L, Geoffrion M, Singaravelu R, Ramphos E, Shangari P, Ouimet M, Pezacki JP, Moore KJ, Perisic L, Maegdefessel L, Hedin U, Harper M-E, Rayner KJ. Macrophage Mitochondrial Energy Status Regulates Cholesterol Efflux and Is Enhanced by Anti-miR33 in Atherosclerosis. Circ Res 117: 266–278, 2015. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Tall AR, Costet P, Wang N. Regulation and mechanisms of macrophage cholesterol efflux. J Clin Invest 110: 899–904, 2002. doi: 10.1172/JCI16391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Kang J-W, Lee S-M. Resolvin D1 protects the liver from ischemia/reperfusion injury by enhancing M2 macrophage polarization and efferocytosis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1861: 1025–1035, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Jiang S, Park DW, Stigler WS, Creighton J, Ravi S, Darley-Usmar V, Zmijewski JW. Mitochondria and AMP-activated Protein Kinase-dependent Mechanism of Efferocytosis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288: 26013–26026, 2013. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.489468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Serhan CN, Levy BD. Proresolving Lipid Mediators in the Respiratory System. Annual Review of Physiology 87: 491–512, 2025. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-020924-033209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Byrne AJ, Mathie SA, Gregory LG, Lloyd CM. Pulmonary macrophages: key players in the innate defence of the airways. Thorax 70: 1189–1196, 2015. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Schebb NH, Kühn H, Kahnt AS, Rund KM, O’Donnell VB, Flamand N, Peters-Golden M, Jakobsson P-J, Weylandt KH, Rohwer N, Murphy RC, Geisslinger G, FitzGerald GA, Hanson J, Dahlgren C, Alnouri MW, Offermanns S, Steinhilber D. Formation, Signaling and Occurrence of Specialized Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators-What is the Evidence so far? Front Pharmacol 13: 838782, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.838782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Wenzek C, Steinbach P, Wirsdörfer F, Sutter K, Boehme JD, Geffers R, Klopfleisch R, Bruder D, Jendrossek V, Buer J, Westendorf AM, Knuschke T. CD47 restricts antiviral function of alveolar macrophages during influenza virus infection. iScience 25: 105540, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Panahipoor Javaherdehi A, Ghanbari S, Mahdavi P, Zafarani A, Razizadeh MH. The role of alveolar macrophages in viral respiratory infections and their therapeutic implications. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports 40: 101826, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ni M, Zhang J, Sosa R, Zhang H, Wang H, Jin D, Crowley K, Naini B, Reed FE, Busuttil RW, Kupiec-Weglinski JW, Wang X, Zhai Y. T-Cell Immunoglobulin and Mucin Domain-Containing Protein-4 Is Critical for Kupffer Cell Homeostatic Function in the Activation and Resolution of Liver Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Hepatology 74: 2118–2132, 2021. doi: 10.1002/hep.31906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Laskin DL, Malaviya R, Laskin JD. Role of Macrophages in Acute Lung Injury and Chronic Fibrosis Induced by Pulmonary Toxicants. Toxicol Sci 168: 287–301, 2019. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kalish S, Lyamina S, Manukhina E, Malyshev Y, Raetskaya A, Malyshev I. M3 Macrophages Stop Division of Tumor Cells In Vitro and Extend Survival of Mice with Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 23: 8–19, 2017. doi: 10.12659/msmbr.902285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Chow A, Schad S, Green MD, Hellmann MD, Allaj V, Ceglia N, Zago G, Shah NS, Sharma SK, Mattar M, Chan J, Rizvi H, Zhong H, Liu C, Bykov Y, Zamarin D, Shi H, Budhu S, Wohlhieter C, Uddin F, Gupta A, Khodos I, Waninger JJ, Qin A, Markowitz GJ, Mittal V, Balachandran V, Durham JN, Le DT, Zou W, Shah SP, McPherson A, Panageas K, Lewis JS, Perry JSA, de Stanchina E, Sen T, Poirier JT, Wolchok JD, Rudin CM, Merghoub T. Tim-4(+) cavity-resident macrophages impair anti-tumor CD8(+) T cell immunity. Cancer Cell 39: 973–988.e9, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.González de la Aleja A, Herrero C, Torres-Torresano M, de la Rosa JV, Alonso B, Capa-Sardón E, Muller IB, Jansen G, Puig-Kröger A, Vega MA, Castrillo A, Corbí ÁL. Activation of LXR Nuclear Receptors Impairs the Anti-Inflammatory Gene and Functional Profile of M-CSF-Dependent Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages. Frontiers in Immunology Volume 13-2022, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.835478. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Li H, Jiang T, Li M-Q, Zheng X-L, Zhao G-J. Transcriptional Regulation of Macrophages Polarization by MicroRNAs. Frontiers in Immunology Volume 9-2018, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Meng C, Wang S, Wang X, Lv J, Zeng W, Chang R, Li Q, Wang X. Amphiregulin inhibits TNF-α-induced alveolar epithelial cell death through EGFR signaling pathway. Biomed Pharmacother 125: 109995, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Minutti CM, Modak RV, Macdonald F, Li F, Smyth DJ, Dorward DA, Blair N, Husovsky C, Muir A, Giampazolias E, Dobie R, Maizels RM, Kendall TJ, Griggs DW, Kopf M, Henderson NC, Zaiss DM. A Macrophage-Pericyte Axis Directs Tissue Restoration via Amphiregulin-Induced Transforming Growth Factor Beta Activation. Immunity 50: 645–654.e6, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Zahoor I, Giri S. Specialized Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators: Emerging Therapeutic Candidates for Multiple Sclerosis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 60: 147–163, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12016-020-08796-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Poon IKH, Lucas CD, Rossi AG, Ravichandran KS. Apoptotic cell clearance: basic biology and therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Immunol 14: 166–180, 2014. doi: 10.1038/nri3607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Scott RS, McMahon EJ, Pop SM, Reap EA, Caricchio R, Cohen PL, Earp HS, Matsushima GK. Phagocytosis and clearance of apoptotic cells is mediated by MER. Nature 411: 207–211, 2001. doi: 10.1038/35075603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Miyanishi M, Tada K, Koike M, Uchiyama Y, Kitamura T, Nagata S. Identification of Tim4 as a phosphatidylserine receptor. Nature 450: 435–439, 2007. doi: 10.1038/nature06307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Greenberg ME, Sun M, Zhang R, Febbraio M, Silverstein R, Hazen SL. Oxidized phosphatidylserine-CD36 interactions play an essential role in macrophage-dependent phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J Exp Med 203: 2613–2625, 2006. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Prieto AL, Weber JL, Tracy S, Heeb MJ, Lai C. Gas6, a ligand for the receptor protein-tyrosine kinase Tyro-3, is widely expressed in the central nervous system. Brain Res 816: 646–661, 1999. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)01159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Tsou W-I, Nguyen K-QN, Calarese DA, Garforth SJ, Antes AL, Smirnov SV, Almo SC, Birge RB, Kotenko SV. Receptor tyrosine kinases, TYRO3, AXL, and MER, demonstrate distinct patterns and complex regulation of ligand-induced activation. J Biol Chem 289: 25750–25763, 2014. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.569020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Païdassi H, Tacnet-Delorme P, Garlatti V, Darnault C, Ghebrehiwet B, Gaboriaud C, Arlaud GJ, Frachet P. C1q binds phosphatidylserine and likely acts as a multiligand-bridging molecule in apoptotic cell recognition. J Immunol 180: 2329–2338, 2008. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Kobayashi N, Karisola P, Peña-Cruz V, Dorfman DM, Jinushi M, Umetsu SE, Butte MJ, Nagumo H, Chernova I, Zhu B, Sharpe AH, Ito S, Dranoff G, Kaplan GG, Casasnovas JM, Umetsu DT, Dekruyff RH, Freeman GJ. TIM-1 and TIM-4 glycoproteins bind phosphatidylserine and mediate uptake of apoptotic cells. Immunity 27: 927–940, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Vandivier RW, Richens TR, Horstmann SA, deCathelineau AM, Ghosh M, Reynolds SD, Xiao Y-Q, Riches DW, Plumb J, Vachon E, Downey GP, Henson PM. Dysfunctional cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator inhibits phagocytosis of apoptotic cells with proinflammatory consequences. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 297: L677–686, 2009. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00030.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Heckmann BL, Green DR. LC3-associated phagocytosis at a glance. J Cell Sci 132, 2019. doi: 10.1242/jcs.222984. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Heckmann BL, Boada-Romero E, Cunha LD, Magne J, Green DR. LC3-Associated Phagocytosis and Inflammation. J Mol Biol 429: 3561–3576, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Sun Q, Fan J, Billiar TR, Scott MJ. Inflammasome and Autophagy Regulation: A Two-way Street. Molecular Medicine 23: 188–195, 2017. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2017.00077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Florey O, Kim SE, Sandoval CP, Haynes CM, Overholtzer M. Autophagy machinery mediates macroendocytic processing and entotic cell death by targeting single membranes. Nature Cell Biology 13: 1335–1343, 2011. doi: 10.1038/ncb2363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Yuan J, Zhang Q, Chen S, Yan M, Yue L. LC3-Associated Phagocytosis in Bacterial Infection. Pathogens 11, 2022. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11080863. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Wong S-W, Sil P, Martinez J. Rubicon: LC3-associated phagocytosis and beyond. FEBS J 285: 1379–1388, 2018. doi: 10.1111/febs.14354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Omrane M, Ben M’Barek K, Santinho A, Nguyen N, Nag S, Melia TJ, Thiam AR. LC3B is lipidated to large lipid droplets during prolonged starvation for noncanonical autophagy. Dev Cell 58: 1266–1281.e7, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Chen X, Su Q, Gong R, Ling X, Xu R, Feng Q, Ke J, Liu M, Kahaerjiang G, Liu Y, Yang Y, Jiang Z, Wu H, Qi Y. LC3-associated phagocytosis and human diseases: Insights from mechanisms to therapeutic potential. FASEB J 38: e70130, 2024. doi: 10.1096/fj.202402126R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Little I, Bersie S, Redente EF, McCubbrey AL, Tarling EJ. Alveolar macrophages: guardians of the alveolar lipid galaxy. Curr Opin Lipidol 36: 153–162, 2025. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Hussell T, Bell TJ. Alveolar macrophages: plasticity in a tissue-specific context. Nat Rev Immunol 14: 81–93, 2014. doi: 10.1038/nri3600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Guilliams M, De Kleer I, Henri S, Post S, Vanhoutte L, De Prijck S, Deswarte K, Malissen B, Hammad H, Lambrecht BN. Alveolar macrophages develop from fetal monocytes that differentiate into long-lived cells in the first week of life via GM-CSF. J Exp Med 210: 1977–1992, 2013. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Gautier EL, Shay T, Miller J, Greter M, Jakubzick C, Ivanov S, Helft J, Chow A, Elpek KG, Gordonov S, Mazloom AR, Ma’ayan A, Chua W-J, Hansen TH, Turley SJ, Merad M, Randolph GJ, Gautier EL, Jakubzick C, Randolph GJ, Best AJ, Knell J, Goldrath A, Miller J, Brown B, Merad M, Jojic V, Koller D, Cohen N, Brennan P, Brenner M, Shay T, Regev A, Fletcher A, Elpek K, Bellemare-Pelletier A, Malhotra D, Turley S, Jianu R, Laidlaw D, Collins J, Narayan K, Sylvia K, Kang J, Gazit R, Garrison BS, Rossi DJ, Kim F, Rao TN, Wagers A, Shinton SA, Hardy RR, Monach P, Bezman NA, Sun JC, Kim CC, Lanier LL, Heng T, Kreslavsky T, Painter M, Ericson J, Davis S, Mathis D, Benoist C, the Immunological Genome Consortium. Gene-expression profiles and transcriptional regulatory pathways that underlie the identity and diversity of mouse tissue macrophages. Nature Immunology 13: 1118–1128, 2012. doi: 10.1038/ni.2419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Baker AD, Malur A, Barna BP, Ghosh S, Kavuru MS, Malur AG, Thomassen MJ. Targeted PPARγ deficiency in alveolar macrophages disrupts surfactant catabolism. Journal of Lipid Research 51: 1325–1331, 2010. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M001651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.O’Neill LAJ, Kishton RJ, Rathmell J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nature Reviews Immunology 16: 553–565, 2016. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.70. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Tannahill GM, Curtis AM, Adamik J, Palsson-McDermott EM, McGettrick AF, Goel G, Frezza C, Bernard NJ, Kelly B, Foley NH, Zheng L, Gardet A, Tong Z, Jany SS, Corr SC, Haneklaus M, Caffrey BE, Pierce K, Walmsley S, Beasley FC, Cummins E, Nizet V, Whyte M, Taylor CT, Lin H, Masters SL, Gottlieb E, Kelly VP, Clish C, Auron PE, Xavier RJ, O’Neill LAJ. Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature 496: 238–242, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nature11986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Chang C-H, Curtis JD, Maggi LBJ, Faubert B, Villarino AV, O’Sullivan D, Huang SC- C, van der Windt GJW, Blagih J, Qiu J, Weber JD, Pearce EJ, Jones RG, Pearce EL. Posttranscriptional control of T cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell 153: 1239–1251, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Nathan C, Xie QW. Nitric oxide synthases: roles, tolls, and controls. Cell 78: 915–918, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90266-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Erlich JR, To EE, Luong R, Liong F, Liong S, Oseghale O, Miles MA, Bozinovski S, Brooks RD, Vlahos R, Chan S, O’Leary JJ, Brooks DA, Selemidis S. Glycolysis and the Pentose Phosphate Pathway Promote LPS-Induced NOX2 Oxidase- and IFN-β-Dependent Inflammation in Macrophages. Antioxidants (Basel) 11, 2022. doi: 10.3390/antiox11081488. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Vats D, Mukundan L, Odegaard JI, Zhang L, Smith KL, Morel CR, Wagner RA, Greaves DR, Murray PJ, Chawla A. Oxidative metabolism and PGC-1beta attenuate macrophage-mediated inflammation. Cell Metab 4: 13–24, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Pearce EL, Pearce EJ. Metabolic pathways in immune cell activation and quiescence. Immunity 38: 633–643, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Nathan C Neutrophils and Immunity: Challenges and oppotunities. 6: 173–182, [date unknown]. [Google Scholar]
- 157.Giacalone VD. Neutrophil Adaptations upon Recruitment to the Lung: New Concepts and Implications for Homeostasis and Disease. International journal of molecular sciences 21: 851, 2020. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Xuan N Neutrophil extracellular traps and their implications in airway inflammatory diseases. 10, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1331000. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Haynes ME, Sullivan DP, Muller WA. Neutrophil Infiltration and Function in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Airspace Disease. The American Journal of Pathology 194: 628–636, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2023.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Rossaint J, Zarbock A. Tissue-specific neutrophil recruitment into the lung, liver, and kidney. J Innate Immun 5: 348–357, 2013. doi: 10.1159/000345943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Cagle LA, Linderholm AL, Franzi LM, Last JA, Simon SI, Kenyon NJ, Harper RW. Early mechanisms of neutrophil activation and transmigration in acute lung injury. Frontiers in Physiology Volume 13-2022, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1059686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Whyte MKB, Haslett C, Chilvers ER. Granulocyte apoptosis. In: The Resolution of Inflammation, edited by Rossi AG, Sawatzky DA. Birkhäuser Basel, p. 19–37. [Google Scholar]
- 163.Better J, Wetstein M, Estiri M, Malainou C, Ferrero MR, Langelage M, Kuznetsova I, Vazquez-Armendariz I, Kimmig L, Mansouri S, Savai R, Wilhelm J, Alexopoulos I, Sommer N, Herold S, Matt U. Cell-type-specific efferocytosis determines functional plasticity of alveolar macrophages. . [Google Scholar]
- 164.Son S Neutrophils Facilitate Prolonged Inflammasome Response in the DAMP-Rich Inflammatory Milieu. Front Immunol 12, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.746032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Misharin AV, Morales-Nebreda L, Mutlu GM, Budinger GRS, Perlman H. Flow cytometric analysis of macrophages and dendritic cell subsets in the mouse lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 49: 503–510, 2013. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0086MA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.chen GY. Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage. NAture Reveiws Immunology 10: 826–37, [date unknown]. doi: 10.1038/nri2873. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Coll RC, Schroder K. Inflammasome components as new therapeutic targets in inflammatory disease. Nature Reviews Immunology 25: 22–41, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-01075-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Chakraborti S Role of Proteases in Lung disease: A Brief Overview. Proteases in Human Diseases : 333–374, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-3162-5_16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Christopoulou M-E, Papakonstantinou E, Stolz D. Matrix Metalloproteinases in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Int J Mol Sci 24, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043786. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zhou H, Zhang Q, Liu C, Fan J, Huang W, Li N, Yang M, Wang H, Xie W, Kong H. NLRP3 inflammasome mediates abnormal epithelial regeneration and distal lung remodeling in silica-induced lung fibrosis. Int J Mol Med 53: 25, 2024. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2024.5349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Shim W-Y, Seo S-M, Kim D-H, Park Y-J, Kim N-W, Yoo E-S, Lee J-H, Jeong H-B, Seo J-H, Lee K-S, Choi Y-K. A novel chronic obstructive pulmonary disease mouse model induced by intubation-mediated intratracheal co-administration of porcine pancreatic elastase and lipopolysaccharide. BMC Pulmonary Medicine 24: 564, 2024. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03365-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Pouwels SD, Heijink IH, Ten Hacken NH, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV, Nawijn MC, Van Oosterhout AJ. DAMPs activating innate and adaptive immune responses in COPD. Mucosal Immunology 7: 215–226, 2014. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Misharin AV, Morales-Nebreda L, Reyfman PA, Cuda CM, Walter JM, McQuattie-Pimentel AC, Chen C-I, Anekalla KR, Joshi N, Williams KJN, Abdala-Valencia H, Yacoub TJ, Chi M, Chiu S, Gonzalez-Gonzalez FJ, Gates K, Lam AP, Nicholson TT, Homan PJ, Soberanes S, Dominguez S, Morgan VK, Saber R, Shaffer A, Hinchcliff M, Marshall SA, Bharat A, Berdnikovs S, Bhorade SM, Bartom ET, Morimoto RI, Balch WE, Sznajder JI, Chandel NS, Mutlu GM, Jain M, Gottardi CJ, Singer BD, Ridge KM, Bagheri N, Shilatifard A, Budinger GRS, Perlman H. Monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages drive lung fibrosis and persist in the lung over the life span. J Exp Med 214: 2387–2404, 2017. doi: 10.1084/jem.20162152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Fricker M, Lokwani R. COPD: the role of neutrophils in inflammation, pathophysiology, and as drug targets. Clinical Science 139: 1199–1214, 2025. doi: 10.1042/CS20255452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Barnes PJ. Inflammatory mechanisms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 138: 16–27, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Guo D-Y, Liu Z-Y, Xu X-C, Yu J-K, Zhou J-S, Li Z-Y, Lv B-H, Xu T, Chen Z-H. Neutrophil Heterogeneity in Airway Inflammatory Diseases. Inflammation 48: 3800–3827, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s10753-025-02351-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Gasse P, Mary C, Guenon I, Noulin N, Charron S, Schnyder-Candrian S, Schnyder B, Akira S, Quesniaux VFJ, Lagente V, Ryffel B, Couillin I. IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling and the inflammasome are essential in pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 117: 3786–3799, 2007. doi: 10.1172/JCI32285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Smith GJ, Nalesnik M, Immormino RM, Simon JM, Harkema JR, Mock JR, Moran TP, Kelada SNP. Evaluating the role of alveolar macrophages in tolerance to ozone. Toxicological Sciences 207: 487–497, 2025. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaf095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Becker S, Madden MC, Newman SL, Devlin RB, Koren HS. Modulation of human alveolar macrophage properties by ozone exposure in vitro. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 110: 403–415, 1991. doi: 10.1016/0041-008X(91)90042-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Devlin RB, McKinnon KP, Noah T, Becker S, Koren HS. Ozone-induced release of cytokines and fibronectin by alveolar macrophages and airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 266: L612–619, 1994. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1994.266.6.L612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Milillo C, Falcone L, Di Carlo P, Aruffo E, Del Boccio P, Cufaro MC, Patruno A, Pesce M, Ballerini P. Ozone effect on the inflammatory and proteomic profile of human macrophages and airway epithelial cells. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 307: 103979, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2022.103979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Fakhrzadeh L, Laskin JD, Gardner CR, Laskin DL. Superoxide Dismutase–Overexpressing Mice Are Resistant to Ozone-Induced Tissue Injury and Increases in Nitric Oxide and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 30: 280–287, 2004. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2003-0044OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Pendino KJ, Laskin JD, Shuler RL, Punjabi CJ, Laskin DL. Enhanced production of nitric oxide by rat alveolar macrophages after inhalation of a pulmonary irritant is associated with increased expression of nitric oxide synthase. J Immunol 151: 7196–7205, 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Laskin DL, Fakhrzadeh L, Laskin JD. Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Ozone-Induced Lung Injury. In: Biological Reactive Intermediates VI, edited by Dansette PM, Snyder R, Delaforge M, Gibson GG, Greim H, Jollow DJ, Monks TJ, Sipes IG. Springer; US, p. 183–190. [Google Scholar]
- 185.Sunil VR, Francis M, Vayas KN, Cervelli JA, Choi H, Laskin JD, Laskin DL. Regulation of ozone-induced lung inflammation and injury by the β-galactoside-binding lectin galectin-3. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 284: 236–245, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Kumarathasan P, Blais E, Saravanamuthu A, Bielecki A, Mukherjee B, Bjarnason S, Guénette J, Goegan P, Vincent R. Nitrative stress, oxidative stress and plasma endothelin levels after inhalation of particulate matter and ozone. Part Fibre Toxicol 12: 28, 2015. doi: 10.1186/s12989-015-0103-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Martin LD, Krunkosky TM, Voynow JA, Adler KB. The role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in airway epithelial gene expression. Environ Health Perspect 106 Suppl 5: 1197–1203, 1998. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106s51197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Devlin RB, McDonnell WF, Mann R, Becker S, House DE, Schreinemachers D, Koren HS. Exposure of humans to ambient levels of ozone for 6.6 hours causes cellular and biochemical changes in the lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 4: 72–81, 1991. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb/4.1.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Russo RC, Togbe D, Couillin I, Segueni N, Han L, Quesniaux VFJ, Stoeger T, Ryffel B. Ozone-induced lung injury and inflammation: Pathways and therapeutic targets for pulmonary diseases caused by air pollutants. Environment International 198: 109391, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Arjomandi M, Witten A, Abbritti E, Reintjes K, Schmidlin I, Zhai W, Solomon C, Balmes J. Repeated exposure to ozone increases alveolar macrophage recruitment into asthmatic airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172: 427–432, 2005. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200502-272OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Liu Q, Gao Y, Ci X. Role of Nrf2 and Its Activators in Respiratory Diseases. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2019: 1–17, 2019. doi: 10.1155/2019/7090534. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Galiè M, Covi V, Tabaracci G, Malatesta M. The Role of Nrf2 in the Antioxidant Cellular Response to Medical Ozone Exposure. IJMS 20: 4009, 2019. doi: 10.3390/ijms20164009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Guttenberg MA, Vose AT, Birukova A, Lewars K, Cumming RI, Albright MC, Mark JI, Salazar CJ, Swaminathan S, Yu Z, Sokolenko YV, Bunyan E, Yaeger MJ, Fessler MB, Que LG, Gowdy KM, Misharin AV, Tighe RM. Tissue-Resident Alveolar Macrophages Reduce Ozone-induced Inflammation via MerTK-mediated Efferocytosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 70: 493–506, 2024. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2023-0390OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Patial S, Saini Y. Lung macrophages: current understanding of their roles in Ozone-induced lung diseases. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 50: 310–323, 2020. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1762537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Yu X, Buttgereit A, Lelios I, Utz SG, Cansever D, Becher B, Greter M. The Cytokine TGF-β Promotes the Development and Homeostasis of Alveolar Macrophages. Immunity 47: 903–912.e4, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Thomas J, Stalker A, Breznan D, Thomson EM. Ozone-dependent increases in lung glucocorticoids and macrophage response: Effect modification by innate stress axis function. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 86: 103662, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2021.103662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Ogunwale MA, Li M, Ramakrishnam Raju MV, Chen Y, Nantz MH, Conklin DJ, Fu X-A. Aldehyde Detection in Electronic Cigarette Aerosols. ACS Omega 2: 1207–1214, 2017. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.6b00489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Pappas RS, Polzin GM, Watson CH, Ashley DL. Cadmium, lead, and thallium in smoke particulate from counterfeit cigarettes compared to authentic US brands. Food and Chemical Toxicology 45: 202–209, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Valavanidis A, Fiotakis K, Vlachogianni T. Airborne Particulate Matter and Human Health: Toxicological Assessment and Importance of Size and Composition of Particles for Oxidative Damage and Carcinogenic Mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C 26: 339–362, 2008. doi: 10.1080/10590500802494538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Cipoli YA, Furst L, Feliciano M, Alves C. Respiratory deposition dose of PM2.5 and PM10 during night and day periods at an urban environment. Air Qual Atmos Health 16: 2269–2283, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s11869-023-01405-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Häussermann S, Sommerer K, Scheuch G. Regional Lung Deposition: In Vivo Data. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery 33: 291–299, 2020. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2020.29032.sh. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Morillas H, Gallego-Cartagena E, Upasen S. Metals, nonmetals and metalloids in cigarette smoke as hazardous compounds for human health. Science of The Total Environment 923: 171351, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Aridgides DS, Mellinger DL, Armstrong DA, Hazlett HF, Dessaint JA, Hampton TH, Atkins GT, Carroll JL, Ashare A. Functional and metabolic impairment in cigarette smoke-exposed macrophages is tied to oxidative stress. Sci Rep 9: 9624, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46045-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113: 823–839, 2005. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Monick MM, Powers LS, Walters K, Lovan N, Zhang M, Gerke A, Hansdottir S, Hunninghake GW. Identification of an Autophagy Defect in Smokers’ Alveolar Macrophages. The Journal of Immunology 185: 5425–5435, 2010. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Pryor WA, Stone K. Oxidants in Cigarette Smoke Radicals, Hydrogen Peroxide, Peroxynitrate, and Peroxynitritea. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 686: 12–27, 1993. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb39148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Blake DJ, Singh A, Kombairaju P, Malhotra D, Mariani TJ, Tuder RM, Gabrielson E, Biswal S. Deletion of Keap1 in the Lung Attenuates Acute Cigarette Smoke–Induced Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 42: 524–536, 2010. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0054OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Li J, Tong D, Liu J, Chen F, Shen Y. Oroxylin A attenuates cigarette smoke-induced lung inflammation by activating Nrf2. International Immunopharmacology 40: 524–529, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Zhou L, Jian T, Wan Y, Huang R, Fang H, Wang Y, Liang C, Ding X, Chen J. Luteolin Alleviates Oxidative Stress in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Induced by Cigarette Smoke via Modulation of the TRPV1 and CYP2A13/NRF2 Signaling Pathways. IJMS 25: 369, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Saha P, Durugkar S, Jain S, Shantanu PA, Panda SR, Jala A, Gokhale S, Sharma P, Naidu VGM. Piperine Attenuates Cigarette Smoke-Induced Oxidative Stress, Lung Inflammation, and Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition by Modulating the SIRT1/Nrf2 Axis. IJMS 23: 14722, 2022. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Li T, Yu Y, Sun Z, Duan J. A comprehensive understanding of ambient particulate matter and its components on the adverse health effects based from epidemiological and laboratory evidence. Part Fibre Toxicol 19: 67, 2022. doi: 10.1186/s12989-022-00507-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Verma V, Shafer MM, Schauer JJ, Sioutas C. Contribution of transition metals in the reactive oxygen species activity of PM emissions from retrofitted heavy-duty vehicles. Atmospheric Environment 44: 5165–5173, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Li N, Xia T, Nel AE. The role of oxidative stress in ambient particulate matter-induced lung diseases and its implications in the toxicity of engineered nanoparticles. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 44: 1689–1699, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Rojas NY, Agudelo-Castañeda DM, Bustos D, Godri Pollitt KJ, Gao D, Rodriguez-Villamizar LA. Between and within-city variations of PM2.5 oxidative potential in five cities in Colombia. Air Qual Atmos Health 18: 127–140, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s11869-024-01632-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 215.He M, Ichinose T, Yoshida Y, Arashidani K, Yoshida S, Takano H, Sun G, Shibamoto T. Urban PM2.5 exacerbates allergic inflammation in the murine lung via a TLR2/TLR4/MyD88-signaling pathway. Scientific Reports 7: 11027, 2017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11471-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Fu H, Liu X, Li W, Zu Y, Zhou F, Shou Q, Ding Z. PM2.5 Exposure Induces Inflammatory Response in Macrophages via the TLR4/COX-2/NF-κB Pathway. Inflammation 43: 1948–1958, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10753-020-01269-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Zhang Y, Li Q, Zhang W, Chen W, Kong Z, Zhang G, ZhengxiuLuo. The air pollutant PM2.5 aggravates airway inflammation via NF-κB/NLRP3-induced pyroptosis: partially inhibited by the TLR4 inhibitor TAK242. Int Immunopharmacol 163: 115229, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2025.115229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Wang H, Song L, Ju W, Wang X, Dong L, Zhang Y, Ya P, Yang C, Li F. The acute airway inflammation induced by PM(2.5) exposure and the treatment of essential oils in Balb/c mice. Sci Rep 7: 44256, 2017. doi: 10.1038/srep44256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Zhang X, Zhong W, Meng Q, Lin Q, Fang C, Huang X, Li C, Huang Y, Tan J. Ambient PM2.5 exposure exacerbates severity of allergic asthma in previously sensitized mice. J Asthma 52: 785–794, 2015. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1036437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Gawda A, Majka G, Nowak B, Śróttek M, Walczewska M, Marcinkiewicz J. Air particulate matter SRM 1648a primes macrophages to hyperinflammatory response after LPS stimulation. Inflamm Res 67: 765–776, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00011-018-1165-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.He M, Ichinose T, Yoshida S, Shiba F, Arashidani K, Takano H, Sun G, Shibamoto T. Differences in allergic inflammatory responses in murine lungs: comparison of PM2.5 and coarse PM collected during the hazy events in a Chinese city. Inhal Toxicol 28: 706–718, 2016. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2016.1260185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Walters DM, Breysse PN, Wills-Karp M. Ambient urban Baltimore particulate-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164: 1438–1443, 2001. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.8.2007121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Buscetta M, Di Vincenzo S, Miele M, Badami E, Pace E, Cipollina C. Cigarette smoke inhibits the NLRP3 inflammasome and leads to caspase-1 activation via the TLR4-TRIF-caspase-8 axis in human macrophages. FASEB J 34: 1819–1832, 2020. doi: 10.1096/fj.201901239R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Doz E, Noulin N, Boichot E, Guénon I, Fick L, Le Bert M, Lagente V, Ryffel B, Schnyder B, Quesniaux VFJ, Couillin I. Cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation is TLR4/MyD88 and IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling dependent. J Immunol 180: 1169–1178, 2008. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.2.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Mahmoud AA, Abdel-Aziz HO, Elbadr M, Elbadre H. Effect of Nicotine on STAT1 Pathway and Oxidative Stress in Rat Lungs. Rep Biochem Mol Biol 10: 429–436, 2021. doi: 10.52547/rbmb.10.3.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Kim G-D, Shin D-U, Song H-J, Lim KM, Eom J-E, Lim EY, Kim YI, Song JH, Kim H-J, Lee S-Y, Shin HS. Analysis of particulate matter-induced alteration of genes and related signaling pathways in the respiratory system. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 281: 116637, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Zhu X, Zhang Q, Du X, Jiang Y, Niu Y, Wei Y, Zhang Y, Chillrud SN, Liang D, Li H, Chen R, Kan H, Cai J. Respiratory Effects of Traffic-Related Air Pollution: A Randomized, Crossover Analysis of Lung Function, Airway Metabolome, and Biomarkers of Airway Injury. Environ Health Perspect 131: 57002, 2023. doi: 10.1289/EHP11139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Ryan EM, Sadiku P, Coelho P, Watts ER, Zhang A, Howden AJM, Sanchez-Garcia MA, Bewley M, Cole J, McHugh BJ, Vermaelen W, Ghesquiere B, Carmeliet P, Rodriguez Blanco G, Von Kriegsheim A, Sanchez Y, Rumsey W, Callahan JF, Cooper G, Parkinson N, Baillie K, Cantrell DA, McCafferty J, Choudhury G, Singh D, Dockrell DH, Whyte MKB, Walmsley SR. NRF2 Activation Reprograms Defects in Oxidative Metabolism to Restore Macrophage Function in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 207: 998–1011, 2023. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202203-0482OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Taylor AE, Finney-Hayward TK, Quint JK, Thomas CMR, Tudhope SJ, Wedzicha JA, Barnes PJ, Donnelly LE. Defective macrophage phagocytosis of bacteria in COPD. Eur Respir J 35: 1039–1047, 2010. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00036709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Yang DC, Chen C-H. Cigarette Smoking-Mediated Macrophage Reprogramming: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Implications. J Nat Sci 4: e539, 2018. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Churg A, Wang RD, Tai H, Wang X, Xie C, Dai J, Shapiro SD, Wright JL. Macrophage metalloelastase mediates acute cigarette smoke-induced inflammation via tumor necrosis factor-alpha release. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167: 1083–1089, 2003. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200212-1396OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Alam S, Li Z, Janciauskiene S, Mahadeva R. Oxidation of Z α1-antitrypsin by cigarette smoke induces polymerization: a novel mechanism of early-onset emphysema. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 45: 261–269, 2011. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0328OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Sosulski ML, Stiles KM, Frenk EZ, Hart FM, Matsumura Y, De BP, Kaminsky SM, Crystal RG. Gene therapy for alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency with an oxidant-resistant human alpha 1-antitrypsin. JCI Insight 5: 135951, 2020. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.135951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Topic A, Milovanovic V, Lazic Z, Ivosevic A, Radojkovic D. Oxidized Alpha-1-Antitrypsin as a Potential Biomarker Associated with Onset and Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Adult Population. COPD 15: 472–478, 2018. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2018.1541448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Wu H, Wang D, Shi H, Liu N, Wang C, Tian J, Wang X, Zhang Z. PM(2.5) and water-soluble components induce airway fibrosis through TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling pathway in asthmatic rats. Mol Immunol 137: 1–10, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Kayalar Ö, Rajabi H, Konyalilar N, Mortazavi D, Aksoy GT, Wang J, Bayram H. Impact of particulate air pollution on airway injury and epithelial plasticity; underlying mechanisms. Front Immunol 15: 1324552, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1324552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Zou W, Liu S, Ye D, Bai G, Guo M, Sun R, Ran P. PM2.5 induces lung inflammation and fibrosis via airway smooth muscle cell expression of the Wnt5a/JNK pathway. J Thorac Dis 15: 6094–6105, 2023. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Lee MK, Hong Y, Kim S-Y, London SJ, Kim WJ. DNA methylation and smoking in Korean adults: epigenome-wide association study. Clinical Epigenetics 8: 103, 2016. doi: 10.1186/s13148-016-0266-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Wan ES, Qiu W, Carey VJ, Morrow J, Bacherman H, Foreman MG, Hokanson JE, Bowler RP, Crapo JD, DeMeo DL. Smoking-Associated Site-Specific Differential Methylation in Buccal Mucosa in the COPDGene Study. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 53: 246–254, 2015. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0103OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Ezzie ME, Crawford M, Cho J-H, Orellana R, Zhang S, Gelinas R, Batte K, Yu L, Nuovo G, Galas D, Diaz P, Wang K, Nana-Sinkam SP. Gene expression networks in COPD: microRNA and mRNA regulation. Thorax 67: 122–131, 2012. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Pavel AB, Garrison C, Luo L, Liu G, Taub D, Xiao J, Juan-Guardela B, Tedrow J, Alekseyev YO, Yang IV, Geraci MW, Sciurba F, Schwartz DA, Kaminski N, Beane J, Spira A, Lenburg ME, Campbell JD. Integrative genetic and genomic networks identify microRNA associated with COPD and ILD. Scientific Reports 13: 13076, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39751-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Stolzenburg LR, Harris A. The role of microRNAs in chronic respiratory disease: recent insights. Biol Chem 399: 219–234, 2018. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2017-0249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Gilyazova I, Asadullina D, Kagirova E, Sikka R, Mustafin A, Ivanova E, Bakhtiyarova K, Gilyazova G, Gupta S, Khusnutdinova E, Gupta H, Pavlov V. MiRNA-146a-A Key Player in Immunity and Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 24, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijms241612767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Rico de Souza A, Zago M, Pollock SJ, Sime PJ, Phipps RP, Baglole CJ. Genetic ablation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor causes cigarette smoke-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. J Biol Chem 286: 43214–43228, 2011. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.258764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Parajuli N, Subedi K, Solone XK, Jiang A, Zhou L, Mi Q-S. Epigenetic Control of Alveolar Macrophages: Impact on Lung Health and Disease. Cells 14, 2025. doi: 10.3390/cells14090640. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Shaykhiev R, Krause A, Salit J, Strulovici-Barel Y, Harvey B-G, O’Connor TP, Crystal RG. Smoking-dependent reprogramming of alveolar macrophage polarization: implication for pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Immunol 183: 2867–2883, 2009. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Zong D, Liu X, Li J, Ouyang R, Chen P. The role of cigarette smoke-induced epigenetic alterations in inflammation. Epigenetics & Chromatin 12: 65, 2019. doi: 10.1186/s13072-019-0311-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Ito K, Yamamura S, Essilfie-Quaye S, Cosio B, Ito M, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Histone deacetylase 2-mediated deacetylation of the glucocorticoid receptor enables NF-kappaB suppression. J Exp Med 203: 7–13, 2006. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.De Smet EG, Van Eeckhoutte HP, Avila Cobos F, Blomme E, Verhamme FM, Provoost S, Verleden SE, Venken K, Maes T, Joos GF, Mestdagh P, Brusselle GG, Bracke KR. The role of miR-155 in cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation and COPD. Mucosal Immunol 13: 423–436, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0241-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Kim RY, Sunkara KP, Bracke KR, Jarnicki AG, Donovan C, Hsu AC, Ieni A, Beckett EL, Galvão I, Wijnant S, Ricciardolo FL, Di Stefano A, Haw TJ, Liu G, Ferguson AL, Palendira U, Wark PA, Conickx G, Mestdagh P, Brusselle GG, Caramori G, Foster PS, Horvat JC, Hansbro PM. A microRNA-21-mediated SATB1/S100A9/NF-κB axis promotes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease pathogenesis. Sci Transl Med 13: eaav7223, 2021. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav7223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Xu H, Li X, Liu K, Huang P, Liu X-J. PM2.5 Promotes Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Response Through Airway Epithelial Cell-Derived Exosomal miR-155-5p. J Inflamm Res 17: 8555–8567, 2024. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S482509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Jiang Y, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Chen H, Zhou X. Fine particulate matter exposure promotes M2 macrophage polarization through inhibiting histone deacetylase 2 in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Transl Med 8: 1303, 2020. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Liu Y, Yuan Q, Zhang X, Chen Z, Jia X, Wang M, Xu T, Wang Z, Jiang J, Ma Q, Zhang M, Huang M, Ji N. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) induces inhibitory memory alveolar macrophages through the AhR/IL-33 pathway. Cell Immunol 386: 104694, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2023.104694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Miller GE, Passarelli V, Chen E, Kloog I, Wright RJ, Amini H. Ambient PM(2.5) and specific sources increase inflammatory cytokine responses to stimulators and reduce sensitivity to inhibitors. Environ Res 252: 118964, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Gangamma S Airborne Particulate Matter and Innate Immunity Activation. Environ Sci Technol 46: 10879–10880, 2012. doi: 10.1021/es303491j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Michaeloudes C, Bhavsar PK, Mumby S, Xu B, Hui CKM, Chung KF, Adcock IM. Role of Metabolic Reprogramming in Pulmonary Innate Immunity and Its Impact on Lung Diseases. J Innate Immun 12: 31–46, 2020. doi: 10.1159/000504344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Lugg ST, Scott A, Parekh D, Naidu B, Thickett DR. Cigarette smoke exposure and alveolar macrophages: mechanisms for lung disease. Thorax 77: 94–101, 2022. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Kuo C-W, Su P-L, Huang T-H, Lin C-C, Chen C-W, Tsai J-S, Liao X-M, Chan T-Y, Shieh C-C. Cigarette smoke increases susceptibility of alveolar macrophages to SARS-CoV-2 infection through inducing reactive oxygen species-upregulated angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expression. Sci Rep 13: 7894, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34785-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Irie H, Ozaki M, Chubachi S, Hegab AE, Tsutsumi A, Kameyama N, Sakurai K, Nakayama S, Kagawa S, Wada S, Ishii M, Betsuyaku T, Fukunaga K. Short-term intermittent cigarette smoke exposure enhances alveolar type 2 cell stemness via fatty acid oxidation. Respiratory Research 23: 41, 2022. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-01948-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Hodge S, Hodge G, Holmes M, Reynolds PN. Increased airway epithelial and T-cell apoptosis in COPD remains despite smoking cessation. Eur Respir J 25: 447–454, 2005. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00077604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Cano M, Thimmalappula R, Fujihara M, Nagai N, Sporn M, Wang AL, Neufeld AH, Biswal S, Handa JT. Cigarette smoking, oxidative stress, the anti-oxidant response through Nrf2 signaling, and Age-related Macular Degeneration. Vision Res 50: 652–664, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Bolger GB. Therapeutic Targets and Precision Medicine in COPD: Inflammation, Ion Channels, Both, or Neither? Int J Mol Sci 24, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijms242417363. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Zhang L, Guo R, Wu H, Abudusalamu A, Ding W, Li D, Wei X, Niu L. The Crucial Role of the PPAR Signaling Pathway in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Analysis of Gene Expression and Macrophage Polarization. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 20: 2287–2304, 2025. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S518592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.van den Berg MP, Meurs H, Gosens R. Targeting arginase and nitric oxide metabolism in chronic airway diseases and their co-morbidities. Curr Opin Pharmacol 40: 126–133, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2018.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Hornung V, Bauernfeind F, Halle A, Samstad EO, Kono H, Rock KL, Fitzgerald KA, Latz E. Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nat Immunol 9: 847–856, 2008. doi: 10.1038/ni.1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Kuroda E, Ishii KJ, Uematsu S, Ohata K, Coban C, Akira S, Aritake K, Urade Y, Morimoto Y. Silica crystals and aluminum salts regulate the production of prostaglandin in macrophages via NALP3 inflammasome-independent mechanisms. Immunity 34: 514–526, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Dostert C, Pétrilli V, Van Bruggen R, Steele C, Mossman BT, Tschopp J. Innate immune activation through Nalp3 inflammasome sensing of asbestos and silica. Science 320: 674–677, 2008. doi: 10.1126/science.1156995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Cassel SL, Eisenbarth SC, Iyer SS, Sadler JJ, Colegio OR, Tephly LA, Carter AB, Rothman PB, Flavell RA, Sutterwala FS. The Nalp3 inflammasome is essential for the development of silicosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 9035–9040, 2008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803933105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Peukert K, Steinhagen F, Fox M, Feuerborn C, Schulz S, Seeliger B, Schuss P, Schneider M, Frede S, Sauer A, Putensen C, Latz E, Wilhelm C, Bode C. Tetracycline ameliorates silica-induced pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis via inhibition of caspase-1. Respir Res 23: 21, 2022. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-01937-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Leung J, Chang M, Moore RE, Dagvadorj J, Sutterwala FS, Cassel SL. Gasdermin D and Gasdermin E Are Dispensable for Silica-Mediated IL-1β Secretion from Mouse Macrophages. Immunohorizons 8: 679–687, 2024. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2400019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Morishige T, Yoshioka Y, Inakura H, Tanabe A, Yao X, Narimatsu S, Monobe Y, Imazawa T, Tsunoda S, Tsutsumi Y, Mukai Y, Okada N, Nakagawa S. The effect of surface modification of amorphous silica particles on NLRP3 inflammasome mediated IL-1beta production, ROS production and endosomal rupture. Biomaterials 31: 6833–6842, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Du S-L, Zhou Y-T, Hu H-J, Lin L, Zhang Z-Q. Silica-induced ROS in alveolar macrophages and its role on the formation of pulmonary fibrosis via polarizing macrophages into M2 phenotype: a review. Toxicol Mech Methods 35: 89–100, 2025. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2024.2400323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Liu T-T, Sun H-F, Han Y-X, Zhan Y, Jiang J-D. The role of inflammation in silicosis. Front Pharmacol 15: 1362509, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1362509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Rees D, Murray J. Silica, silicosis and tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 11: 474–484, 2007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Jamshidi P, Danaei B, Arbabi M, Mohammadzadeh B, Khelghati F, Akbari Aghababa A, Nayebzade A, Shahidi Bonjar AH, Centis R, Sotgiu G, Nasiri MJ, Migliori GB. Silicosis and tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pulmonology 31: 2416791, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Ehrlich R, Akugizibwe P, Siegfried N, Rees D. The association between silica exposure, silicosis and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 21: 953, 2021. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10711-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Donaldson K, Murphy FA, Duffin R, Poland CA. Asbestos, carbon nanotubes and the pleural mesothelium: a review of the hypothesis regarding the role of long fibre retention in the parietal pleura, inflammation and mesothelioma. Part Fibre Toxicol 7: 5, 2010. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-7-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Padmore T, Stark C, Turkevich LA, Champion JA. Quantitative analysis of the role of fiber length on phagocytosis and inflammatory response by alveolar macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1861: 58–67, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.09.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Kuroda A Recent progress and perspectives on the mechanisms underlying Asbestos toxicity. Genes Environ 43: 46, 2021. doi: 10.1186/s41021-021-00215-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Klebe S, Leigh J, Henderson DW, Nurminen M. Asbestos, Smoking and Lung Cancer: An Update. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17, 2019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Cagle PT, Wessels R, Greenberg SD. Concurrent mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma of the lung in a patient with asbestosis. Mod Pathol 6: 438–441, 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Sayan M, Mossman BT. The NLRP3 inflammasome in pathogenic particle and fibre-associated lung inflammation and diseases. Part Fibre Toxicol 13: 51, 2016. doi: 10.1186/s12989-016-0162-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Tanaka S, Choe N, Hemenway DR, Zhu S, Matalon S, Kagan E. Asbestos inhalation induces reactive nitrogen species and nitrotyrosine formation in the lungs and pleura of the rat. J Clin Invest 102: 445–454, 1998. doi: 10.1172/JCI3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Crouch E, Churg A. Ferruginous bodies and the histologic evaluation of dust exposure. Am J Surg Pathol 8: 109–116, 1984. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198402000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Avramescu M-L, Potiszil C, Kunihiro T, Okabe K, Nakamura E. An investigation of the internal morphology of asbestos ferruginous bodies: constraining their role in the onset of malignant mesothelioma. Part Fibre Toxicol 20: 19, 2023. doi: 10.1186/s12989-023-00522-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Churg A, Warnock ML. Analysis of the cores of ferruginous (asbestos) bodies from the general population. I. Patients with and without lung cancer. Lab Invest 37: 280–286, 1977. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Jaurand MC. Mechanisms of fiber-induced genotoxicity. Environ Health Perspect 105 Suppl 5: 1073–1084, 1997. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s51073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Lund LG, Williams MG, Dodson RF, Aust AE. Iron associated with asbestos bodies is responsible for the formation of single strand breaks in phi X174 RFI DNA. Occup Environ Med 51: 200–204, 1994. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.3.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Aust AE, Cook PM, Dodson RF. Morphological and chemical mechanisms of elongated mineral particle toxicities. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 14: 40–75, 2011. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2011.556046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Borelli V, Zangari M, Bernareggi A, Bardelli F, Vita F, Zabucchi G. Ferruginous bodies exert a strong proinflammatory effect. J Toxicol Environ Health A 86: 241–245, 2023. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2023.2181899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Heintz NH, Janssen-Heininger YMW, Mossman BT. Asbestos, lung cancers, and mesotheliomas: from molecular approaches to targeting tumor survival pathways. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 42: 133–139, 2010. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0206TR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Benedetti S, Nuvoli B, Catalani S, Galati R. Reactive oxygen species a double-edged sword for mesothelioma. Oncotarget 6: 16848–16865, 2015. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Manning CB, Vallyathan V, Mossman BT. Diseases caused by asbestos: mechanisms of injury and disease development. Int Immunopharmacol 2: 191–200, 2002. doi: 10.1016/s1567-5769(01)00172-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Hubaux R, Becker-Santos DD, Enfield KSS, Lam S, Lam WL, Martinez VD. Arsenic, asbestos and radon: emerging players in lung tumorigenesis. Environ Health 11: 89, 2012. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Cheng YY, Rath EM, Linton A, Yuen ML, Takahashi K, Lee K. The Current Understanding Of Asbestos-Induced Epigenetic Changes Associated With Lung Cancer. Lung Cancer (Auckl) 11: 1–11, 2020. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S186843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Hiltbrunner S, Fleischmann Z, Sokol ES, Zoche M, Felley-Bosco E, Curioni-Fontecedro A. Genomic landscape of pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma tumours. Br J Cancer 127: 1997–2005, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01979-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Liu G, Cheresh P, Kamp DW. Molecular basis of asbestos-induced lung disease. Annu Rev Pathol 8: 161–187, 2013. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020712-163942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Pfau JC, McLaurin B, Buck BJ, Miller FW. Amphibole asbestos as an environmental trigger for systemic autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev 23: 103603, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Hiraku Y, Watanabe J, Kaneko A, Ichinose T, Murata M. MicroRNA expression in lung tissues of asbestos-exposed mice: Upregulation of miR-21 and downregulation of tumor suppressor genes Pdcd4 and Reck. J Occup Health 63: e12282, 2021. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Moran AMA, Sánchez PAÁ, Ríos JAT, Castillo LV. Epigenomics in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. In: Mesothelioma - Diagnostics, Treatment and Basic Research, edited by Strumfa I IntechOpen. [Google Scholar]
- 301.Laney AS, Weissman DN. Respiratory diseases caused by coal mine dust. J Occup Environ Med 56 Suppl 10: S18–22, 2014. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Bahram Yazdroudi F, Malek A. Reducing M2 macrophage in lung fibrosis by controlling anti-M1 agent. Scientific Reports 15: 4120, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76561-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Jiang Y, Cai R, Huang Y, Zhu L, Xiao L, Wang C, Wang L. Macrophages in organ fibrosis: from pathogenesis to therapeutic targets. Cell Death Discovery 10: 487, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-02247-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Kelley N, Jeltema D, Duan Y, He Y. The NLRP3 Inflammasome: An Overview of Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation. Int J Mol Sci 20, 2019. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Toyokuni S Iron overload as a major targetable pathogenesis of asbestos-induced mesothelial carcinogenesis. Redox Rep 19: 1–7, 2014. doi: 10.1179/1351000213Y.0000000075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Tan RJ, Fattman CL, Niehouse LM, Tobolewski JM, Hanford LE, Li Q, Monzon FA, Parks WC, Oury TD. Matrix metalloproteinases promote inflammation and fibrosis in asbestos-induced lung injury in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 35: 289–297, 2006. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0471OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Murthy S, Larson-Casey JL, Ryan AJ, He C, Kobzik L, Carter AB. Alternative activation of macrophages and pulmonary fibrosis are modulated by scavenger receptor, macrophage receptor with collagenous structure. FASEB J 29: 3527–3536, 2015. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-271304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 307: 2526–2533, 2012. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med 344: 665–671, 2001. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103013440908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Pepe PE, Potkin RT, Reus DH, Hudson LD, Carrico CJ. Clinical predictors of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Surg 144: 124–130, 1982. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90612-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Bos LDJ, Ware LB. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: causes, pathophysiology, and phenotypes. The Lancet 400: 1145–1156, 2022. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01485-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Hudson LD, Milberg JA, Anardi D, Maunder RJ. Clinical risks for development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151: 293–301, 1995. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.2.7842182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Hunt EB, Sullivan A, Galvin J, MacSharry J, Murphy DM. Gastric Aspiration and Its Role in Airway Inflammation. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal 12: 1–10, 2018. doi: 10.2174/1874306401812010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Cheng CM, Hsieh CC, Lin CS, Dai ZK, Shih PK, Everett ML, Thomas AD, Parker W, Davis RD, Lin SS. Macrophage activation by gastric fluid suggests MMP involvement in aspiration-induced lung disease. Immunobiology 215: 173–181, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Nader ND, McQuiller PS, Raghavendran K, Spengler RN, Knight PR. The role of alveolar macrophages in the pathogenesis of aspiration pneumonitis. Immunol Invest 36: 457–471, 2007. doi: 10.1080/08820130701361053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Raghavendran K, Davidson BA, Chess PR, Nader ND, Notter RH, Knight PR. Acute Inflammatory Gastric Aspiration-Related Lung Injury. Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews 1 Bentham Science Publishers: 279–290, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 317.Dang W, Tao Y, Xu X, Zhao H, Zou L, Li Y. The role of lung macrophages in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Inflammation Research 71: 1417–1432, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s00011-022-01645-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Appel JZ 3rd, Lee SM, Hartwig MG, Li B, Hsieh C-C, Cantu E 3rd, Yoon Y, Lin SS, Parker W, Davis RD. Characterization of the innate immune response to chronic aspiration in a novel rodent model. Respir Res 8: 87, 2007. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-8-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Johnston LK, Rims CR, Gill SE, McGuire JK, Manicone AM. Pulmonary macrophage subpopulations in the induction and resolution of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 47: 417–426, 2012. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2012-0090OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Košutova P, Mikolka P. Aspiration syndromes and associated lung injury: incidence, pathophysiology and management. Physiol Res 70: S567–S583, 2021. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Cardasis JJ, MacMahon H, Husain AN. The spectrum of lung disease due to chronic occult aspiration. Ann Am Thorac Soc 11: 865–873, 2014. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201310-360OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Raghavendran K, Davidson BA, Mullan BA, Hutson AD, Russo TA, Manderscheid PA, Woytash JA, Holm BA, Notter RH, Knight PR. Acid and particulate-induced aspiration lung injury in mice: importance of MCP-1. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 289: L134–L143, 2005. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00390.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Viola A, Munari F, Sánchez-Rodríguez R, Scolaro T, Castegna A. The Metabolic Signature of Macrophage Responses. Front Immunol 10: 1462, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324.He C, Carter AB. The Metabolic Prospective and Redox Regulation of Macrophage Polarization. J Clin Cell Immunol 6: 371, 2015. doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Nakaoka A, Nomura T, Suzuki A, Ozeki K, Kita H, Saitoh S. Aspiration of acidified milk induces milk allergy by activating alveolar macrophages in mice. Allergology International 74: 97–104, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2024.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Fu J, Lin S-H, Wang C-J, Li S-Y, Feng X-Y, Liu Q, Xu F. HMGB1 regulates IL-33 expression in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Int Immunopharmacol 38: 267–274, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Loh Z, Simpson J, Ullah A, Zhang V, Gan WJ, Lynch JP, Werder RB, Sikder AA, Lane K, Sim CB, Porrello E, Mazzone SB, Sly PD, Steptoe RJ, Spann KM, Sukkar MB, Upham JW, Phipps S. HMGB1 amplifies ILC2-induced type-2 inflammation and airway smooth muscle remodelling. PLoS Pathog 16: e1008651, 2020. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Chen B, You WJ, Liu XQ, Xue S, Qin H, Jiang HD. Chronic microaspiration of bile acids induces lung fibrosis through multiple mechanisms in rats. Clinical Science 131: 951–963, 2017. doi: 10.1042/CS20160926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Zhou T, Yu Z, Jian M-Y, Ahmad I, Trempus C, Wagener BM, Pittet J-F, Aggarwal S, Garantziotis S, Song W, Matalon S. Instillation of hyaluronan reverses acid instillation injury to the mammalian blood gas barrier. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 314: L808–L821, 2018. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00510.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Alishlash AS, Yu Z, Lazrak A, Simpson R, Ale GB, Harris WT, Matalon S. Pediatric Chronic Pulmonary Aspiration Is Associated With Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid in the Bronchoalveolar Lavage. Pediatr Pulmonol 60: e71070, 2025. doi: 10.1002/ppul.71070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Lazrak A, Song W, Zhou T, Aggarwal S, Jilling T, Garantziotis S, Matalon S. Hyaluronan and halogen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and lung injury. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1479: 29–43, 2020. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Mobley JA, Molyvdas A, Kojima K, Ahmad I, Jilling T, Li J-L, Garantziotis S, Matalon S. The SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein induces global proteomic changes in ATII-like rat L2 cells that are attenuated by hyaluronan. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 324: L413–L432, 2023. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00282.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Yamamoto Y, Gaynor RB. Therapeutic potential of inhibition of the NF-kappaB pathway in the treatment of inflammation and cancer. J Clin Invest 107: 135–142, 2001. doi: 10.1172/JCI11914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Grommes J, Mörgelin M, Soehnlein O. Pioglitazone attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury by reducing neutrophil recruitment. Eur Respir J 40: 416–423, 2012. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00091011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Bhat MF, Srdanović S, Sundberg L-R, Einarsdóttir HK, Marjomäki V, Dekker FJ. Impact of HDAC inhibitors on macrophage polarization to enhance innate immunity against infections. Drug Discovery Today 29: 104193, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Guo J, Ou Y, Liu Q, Zeng K, Huang Y, Yan F, Cai M, Lyu G. Hydrochloric Acid-Induced Acute Lung Injury Models: Dynamic Change and Quantitative Analysis of Modified Lung Ultrasound Scoring System and High-Resolution Computed Tomography. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 50: 946–953, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Jian M-Y, Koizumi T, Tsushima K, Yokoyama T, Kubo K, Baba A. Exogenous surfactant instillation attenuates inflammatory response to acid-induced lung injury in rat. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 23: 43–47, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338.Segal BH, Davidson BA, Hutson AD, Russo TA, Holm BA, Mullan B, Habitzruther M, Holland SM, Knight PR. Acid aspiration-induced lung inflammation and injury are exacerbated in NADPH oxidase-deficient mice. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 292: L760–L768, 2007. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00281.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339.Gordon S, Taylor PR. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 953–964, 2005. doi: 10.1038/nri1733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340.Hu G, Christman JW. Editorial: Alveolar Macrophages in Lung Inflammation and Resolution. Front Immunol 10: 2275, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341.Pöpperl P, Stoff M, Beineke A. Alveolar Macrophages in Viral Respiratory Infections: Sentinels and Saboteurs of Lung Defense. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, 2025. doi: 10.3390/ijms26010407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 342.Hickman-Davis J, Gibbs-Erwin J, Lindsey JR, Matalon S. Surfactant protein A mediates mycoplasmacidal activity of alveolar macrophages by production of peroxynitrite. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 4953–4958, 1999. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.4953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343.Hickman-Davis JM, Lindsey JR, Zhu S, Matalon S. Surfactant protein A mediates mycoplasmacidal activity of alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol 274: L270–277, 1998. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1998.274.2.L270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 344.McCormack FX, Whitsett JA. The pulmonary collectins, SP-A and SP-D, orchestrate innate immunity in the lung. J Clin Invest 109: 707–712, 2002. doi: 10.1172/JCI15293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 345.Waites KB, Talkington DF. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 17: 697–728, table of contents, 2004. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.697-728.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 346.Atkinson TP, Balish MF, Waites KB. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis and laboratory detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32: 956–973, 2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347.Guo Z-Q, Gu S-Y, Tian Z-H, Du B-Y. A comprehensive review of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in chronic lung diseases: recent advances in understanding asthma, COPD, and bronchiectasis. Front Med (Lausanne) 11: 1437731, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1437731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 348.Love W, Dobbs N, Tabor L, Simecka JW. Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) plays a major role in innate resistance in the lung against murine Mycoplasma. PLoS One 5: e10739, 2010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 349.Lai J-F, Zindl CL, Duffy LB, Atkinson TP, Jung YW, van Rooijen N, Waites KB, Krause DC, Chaplin DD. Critical role of macrophages and their activation via MyD88-NFκB signaling in lung innate immunity to Mycoplasma pneumoniae. PLoS One 5: e14417, 2010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 350.Chen M, Deng H, Zhao Y, Miao X, Gu H, Bi Y, Zhu Y, Guo Y, Shi S, Xu J, Zhao D, Liu F. Toll-Like Receptor 2 Modulates Pulmonary Inflammation and TNF-α Release Mediated by Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12: 824027, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.824027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351.Shimizu T, Kida Y, Kuwano K. Triacylated lipoproteins derived from Mycoplasma pneumoniae activate nuclear factor-kappaB through toll-like receptors 1 and 2. Immunology 121: 473–483, 2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02594.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352.Zuo L, Wu Y, You X. Mycoplasma lipoproteins and Toll-like receptors. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 10: 67–76, 2009. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353.da Silva TA, Zorzetto-Fernandes ALV, Cecílio NT, Sardinha-Silva A, Fernandes FF, Roque-Barreira MC. CD14 is critical for TLR2-mediated M1 macrophage activation triggered by N-glycan recognition. Sci Rep 7: 7083, 2017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07397-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354.Zhang R, Zuo Y, Li S. Mycoplasma pneumoniae MPN606 induces inflammation by activating MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways. Microb Pathog 200: 107288, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355.Zhang Y, Mei S, Zhou Y, Yang D, Pan T, Chen Z, Wang Q. TIPE2 negatively regulates mycoplasma pneumonia-triggered immune response via MAPK signaling pathway. Sci Rep 7: 13319, 2017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13825-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356.Hu J, Ye Y, Chen X, Xiong L, Xie W, Liu P. Insight into the Pathogenic Mechanism of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Curr Microbiol 80: 14, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-03103-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 357.Hickman-Davis JM, Gibbs-Erwin J, Lindsey JR, Matalon S. Role of surfactant protein-A in nitric oxide production and mycoplasma killing in congenic C57BL/6 mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 30: 319–325, 2004. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2003-0246OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358.Powell BC, Rogers GE. Cyclic hair-loss and regrowth in transgenic mice overexpressing an intermediate filament gene. EMBO J 9: 1485–1493, 1990. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08266.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 359.Schagat TL, Wofford JA, Wright JR. Surfactant protein A enhances alveolar macrophage phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils. J Immunol 166: 2727–2733, 2001. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 360.Hickman-Davis JM, Michalek SM, Gibbs-Erwin J, Lindsey JR. Depletion of alveolar macrophages exacerbates respiratory mycoplasmosis in mycoplasma-resistant C57BL mice but not mycoplasma-susceptible C3H mice. Infect Immun 65: 2278–2282, 1997. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.6.2278-2282.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 361.Hao Y, Kuang Z, Jing J, Miao J, Mei LY, Lee RJ, Kim S, Choe S, Krause DC, Lau GW. Mycoplasma pneumoniae modulates STAT3-STAT6/EGFR-FOXA2 signaling to induce overexpression of airway mucins. Infect Immun 82: 5246–5255, 2014. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01989-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 362.Hutchins AP, Diez D, Miranda-Saavedra D. The IL-10/STAT3-mediated anti-inflammatory response: recent developments and future challenges. Brief Funct Genomics 12: 489–498, 2013. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elt028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363.Christodoulides A, Gupta N, Yacoubian V, Maithel N, Parker J, Kelesidis T. The Role of Lipoproteins in Mycoplasma-Mediated Immunomodulation. Front Microbiol 9: 1682, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 364.Yamamoto T, Okuno M, Kuwano K, Ogura Y. Mycoplasma pneumoniae drives macrophage lipid uptake via GlpD-mediated oxidation, facilitating foam cell formation. Int J Med Microbiol 318: 151646, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2025.151646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365.Yavlovich A, Tarshis M, Rottem S. Internalization and intracellular survival of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by non-phagocytic cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett 233: 241–246, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366.Hu J, Chen C, Ou G, You X, Tan T, Hu X, Zeng Y, Yu M, Zhu C. Nrf2 regulates the inflammatory response, including heme oxygenase-1 induction, by mycoplasma pneumoniae lipid-associated membrane proteins in THP-1 cells. Pathog Dis 75, 2017. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftx044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 367.Nandakumar V, Hebrink D, Jenson P, Kottom T, Limper AH. Differential Macrophage Polarization from Pneumocystis in Immunocompetent and Immunosuppressed Hosts: Potential Adjunctive Therapy during Pneumonia. Infect Immun 85, 2017. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00939-16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 368.Xue Y, Wang M, Han H. Interaction between alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells during Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13: 1052020, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1052020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 369.Xue J, Fan Y, Luo R, Duan Y, Ai T, Wang L. Changes in airway resistance and its correlation with disease severity in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Transl Pediatr 14: 939–946, 2025. doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 370.Hardy RD, Jafri HS, Olsen K, Hatfield J, Iglehart J, Rogers BB, Patel P, Cassell G, McCracken GH, Ramilo O. Mycoplasma pneumoniae induces chronic respiratory infection, airway hyperreactivity, and pulmonary inflammation: a murine model of infection-associated chronic reactive airway disease. Infect Immun 70: 649–654, 2002. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.649-654.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 371.Xu W, Wang H, Wen X, Yang H, Zhao S, Liu J. Risk factors for bronchiolitis obliterans development in children after Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a retrospective study of 981 patients. Ital J Pediatr 51: 105, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s13052-025-01932-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372.Flanagan F, Casey A, Reyes-Múgica M, Kurland G. Post-infectious bronchiolitis obliterans in children. Paediatr Respir Rev 42: 69–78, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2022.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373.Hickman-Davis JM, O’Reilly P, Davis IC, Peti-Peterdi J, Davis G, Young KR, Devlin RB, Matalon S. Killing of Klebsiella pneumoniae by human alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282: L944–956, 2002. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00216.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374.Chroneos Z, Shepherd VL. Differential regulation of the mannose and SP-A receptors on macrophages. Am J Physiol 269: L721–726, 1995. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1995.269.6.L721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375.Crouch EC. Surfactant protein-D and pulmonary host defense. Respir Res 1: 93–108, 2000. doi: 10.1186/rr19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376.Li Y, Li X, Wu W, Liu P, Liu J, Jiang H, Deng L, Ni C, Wu X, Zhao Y, Ren J. Insights into the roles of macrophages in Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: a comprehensive review. Cell Mol Biol Lett 30: 34, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s11658-025-00717-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377.Keisari Y, Wang H, Mesika A, Matatov R, Nissimov L, Crouch E, Ofek I. Surfactant protein D-coated Klebsiella pneumoniae stimulates cytokine production in mononuclear phagocytes. J Leukoc Biol 70: 135–141, 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 378.Ofek I, Mesika A, Kalina M, Keisari Y, Podschun R, Sahly H, Chang D, McGregor D, Crouch E. Surfactant protein D enhances phagocytosis and killing of unencapsulated phase variants of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Immun 69: 24–33, 2001. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.1.24-33.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379.Beutler BA. TLRs and innate immunity. Blood 113: 1399–1407, 2009. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-019307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380.Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, Liu MY, Van Huffel C, Du X, Birdwell D, Alejos E, Silva M, Galanos C, Freudenberg M, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Layton B, Beutler B. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science 282: 2085–2088, 1998. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 381.Mikerov AN, Haque R, Gan X, Guo X, Phelps DS, Floros J. Ablation of SP-A has a negative impact on the susceptibility of mice to Klebsiella pneumoniae infection after ozone exposure: sex differences. Respir Res 9: 77, 2008. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-9-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 382.Wang X, Bi C, Xin X, Zhang M, Fu H, Lan L, Wang M, Yan Z. Pyroptosis, apoptosis, and autophagy are involved in infection induced by two clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with different virulence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13: 1165609, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1165609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 383.Matalon S, Wright JR. Surfactant proteins and inflammation: the yin and the yang. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 31: 585–586, 2004. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.F286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 384.Podschun R, Ullmann U. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin Microbiol Rev 11: 589–603, 1998. doi: 10.1128/CMR.11.4.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 385.Dong N, Li R, Lai Y. Editorial: Klebsiella pneumoniae: Antimicrobial resistance, virulence and therapeutic strategies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12: 1108817, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1108817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 386.Pastva AM, Wright JR, Williams KL. Immunomodulatory roles of surfactant proteins A and D: implications in lung disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 4: 252–257, 2007. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-018AW. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 387.Crouch EC, Hirche TO, Shao B, Boxio R, Wartelle J, Benabid R, McDonald B, Heinecke J, Matalon S, Belaaouaj A. Myeloperoxidase-dependent inactivation of surfactant protein D in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 285: 16757–16770, 2010. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.097048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 388.Matalon S, Shrestha K, Kirk M, Waldheuser S, McDonald B, Smith K, Gao Z, Belaaouaj A, Crouch EC. Modification of surfactant protein D by reactive oxygen-nitrogen intermediates is accompanied by loss of aggregating activity, in vitro and in vivo. FASEB J 23: 1415–1430, 2009. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-120568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 389.Zhu S, Kachel DL, Martin WJ 2nd, Matalon S. Nitrated SP-A does not enhance adherence of Pneumocystis carinii to alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol 275: L1031–1039, 1998. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1998.275.6.L1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 390.Paczosa Michelle K, Mecsas Joan. Klebsiella pneumoniae: Going on the Offense with a Strong Defense. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 80: 629–661, 2016. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00078-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 391.Chris Whitfield, Kelly Steven D, Stanton Tom D, Wyres Kelly L, Clarke Bradley R, Forrester Taylor JB, Kowalczyk Agnieszka. O-antigen polysaccharides in Klebsiella pneumoniae: structures and molecular basis for antigenic diversity. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 89: e00090–23, 2025. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00090-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 392.Broug-Holub E, Toews GB, van Iwaarden JF, Strieter RM, Kunkel SL, Paine R 3rd, Standiford TJ. Alveolar macrophages are required for protective pulmonary defenses in murine Klebsiella pneumonia: elimination of alveolar macrophages increases neutrophil recruitment but decreases bacterial clearance and survival. Infect Immun 65: 1139–1146, 1997. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.4.1139-1146.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 393.Fairweather D, Cihakova D. Alternatively activated macrophages in infection and autoimmunity. J Autoimmun 33: 222–230, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 394.Dumigan A, Cappa O, Morris B, Sá Pessoa J, Calderon-Gonzalez R, Mills G, Lancaster R, Simpson D, Kissenpfennig A, Bengoechea JA. In vivo single-cell transcriptomics reveal Klebsiella pneumoniae skews lung macrophages to promote infection. EMBO Mol Med 14: e16888, 2022. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202216888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 395.Prince A, Wong Fok Lung T. Immunometabolic control by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Immunometabolism (Cobham) 5: e00028, 2023. doi: 10.1097/IN9.0000000000000028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 396.Feng Y, Huang C, Wang Y, Chen J. SIRPα: A key player in innate immunity. Eur J Immunol 53: e2350375, 2023. doi: 10.1002/eji.202350375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 397.Neupane AS, Willson M, Chojnacki AK, Vargas E Silva Castanheira F, Morehouse C, Carestia A, Keller AE, Peiseler M, DiGiandomenico A, Kelly MM, Amrein M, Jenne C, Thanabalasuriar A, Kubes P. Patrolling Alveolar Macrophages Conceal Bacteria from the Immune System to Maintain Homeostasis. Cell 183: 110–125.e11, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 398.Aberdein JD, Cole J, Bewley MA, Marriott HM, Dockrell DH. Alveolar macrophages in pulmonary host defence the unrecognized role of apoptosis as a mechanism of intracellular bacterial killing. Clin Exp Immunol 174: 193–202, 2013. doi: 10.1111/cei.12170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 399.Saleh NY, Ibrahem RAL, Saleh AAH, Soliman SES, Mahmoud AAS. Surfactant protein D: a predictor for severity of community-acquired pneumonia in children. Pediatr Res 91: 665–671, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01492-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 400.Watson A, Madsen J, Clark HW. SP-A and SP-D: Dual Functioning Immune Molecules With Antiviral and Immunomodulatory Properties. Frontiers in Immunology Volume 11–2020, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.622598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 401.Shamim A, Abdul Aziz M, Saeed F, Kumari R, Mary Joseph A, Ponnachan P, Kishore U, Masmoudi K. Revisiting surfactant protein D: an immune surveillance molecule bridging innate and adaptive immunity. Front Immunol 15: 1491175, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1491175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 402.Roberti A, Chaffey LE, Greaves DR. NF-κB Signaling and Inflammation-Drug Repurposing to Treat Inflammatory Disorders? Biology (Basel) 11, 2022. doi: 10.3390/biology11030372. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 403.Ding J, Liu Q. Toll-like receptor 4: A promising therapeutic target for pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacteria. J Cell Mol Med 23: 5868–5875, 2019. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 404.Wu QJ, Li Q, Yang P, Du L. Itaconate to treat acute lung injury: recent advances and insights from preclinical models. Am J Transl Res 16: 3480–3497, 2024. doi: 10.62347/NUIN2087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 405.Ma K, Zhou P, Zhang W, Zeng L, Tao K, Zhang P. Itaconic Acid: A Regulator of Immune Responses and Inflammatory Metabolism. Curr Issues Mol Biol 47, 2025. doi: 10.3390/cimb47070534. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 406.Reddy AT, Lakshmi SP, Reddy RC. PPARγ in Bacterial Infections: A Friend or Foe? PPAR Res 2016: 7963540, 2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/7963540. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 407.Ramirez-Moral I, Ferreira BL, de Vos AF, van der Poll T. Post-treatment with the PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone inhibits inflammation and bacterial growth during Klebsiella pneumonia. Respir Res 22: 230, 2021. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01823-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 408.Short KR, Kroeze EJBV, Fouchier RAM, Kuiken T. Pathogenesis of influenza-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Infect Dis 14: 57–69, 2014. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70286-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 409.Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Fauci AS. Predominant role of bacterial pneumonia as a cause of death in pandemic influenza: implications for pandemic influenza preparedness. J Infect Dis 198: 962–970, 2008. doi: 10.1086/591708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 410.Short KR, Kedzierska K, van de Sandt CE. Back to the Future: Lessons Learned From the 1918 Influenza Pandemic. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8: 343, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 411.van Riel D, Munster VJ, de Wit E, Rimmelzwaan GF, Fouchier RAM, Osterhaus ADME, Kuiken T. H5N1 Virus Attachment to Lower Respiratory Tract. Science 312: 399, 2006. doi: 10.1126/science.1125548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 412.Kim HM, Lee Y-W, Lee K-J, Kim HS, Cho SW, van Rooijen N, Guan Y, Seo SH. Alveolar macrophages are indispensable for controlling influenza viruses in lungs of pigs. J Virol 82: 4265–4274, 2008. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02602-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 413.Ghoneim HE, Thomas PG, McCullers JA. Depletion of alveolar macrophages during influenza infection facilitates bacterial superinfections. J Immunol 191: 1250–1259, 2013. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 414.van Riel D, Leijten LME, van der Eerden M, Hoogsteden HC, Boven LA, Lambrecht BN, Osterhaus ADME, Kuiken T. Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 infects alveolar macrophages without virus production or excessive TNF-alpha induction. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002099, 2011. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 415.Lercher A, Cheong J-G, Bale MJ, Jiang C, Hoffmann H-H, Ashbrook AW, Lewy T, Yin YS, Quirk C, DeGrace EJ, Chiriboga L, Rosenberg BR, Josefowicz SZ, Rice CM. Antiviral innate immune memory in alveolar macrophages following SARS-CoV-2 infection ameliorates secondary influenza A virus disease. Immunity 57: 2530-2546.e13, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 416.Zhu H, Pu S, He P, Luo J, Gao R. Construction and Research Progress of Animal Models and Mouse Adapted Strains of Seasonal Influenza Virus. Vaccines (Basel) 13, 2025. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13101077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 417.Rehwinkel J, Gack MU. RIG-I-like receptors: their regulation and roles in RNA sensing. Nat Rev Immunol 20: 537–551, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0288-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 418.Kandasamy M, Suryawanshi A, Tundup S, Perez JT, Schmolke M, Manicassamy S, Manicassamy B. RIG-I Signaling Is Critical for Efficient Polyfunctional T Cell Responses during Influenza Virus Infection. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005754, 2016. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 419.Chen X, Liu S, Goraya MU, Maarouf M, Huang S, Chen J-L. Host Immune Response to Influenza A Virus Infection. Front Immunol 9: 320, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 420.Liu Q, Zhou Y, Yang Z. The cytokine storm of severe influenza and development of immunomodulatory therapy. Cell Mol Immunol 13: 3–10, 2016. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 421.Gu Y, Zuo X, Zhang S, Ouyang Z, Jiang S, Wang F, Wang G. The Mechanism behind Influenza Virus Cytokine Storm. Viruses 13, 2021. doi: 10.3390/v13071362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 422.Yu WCL, Chan RWY, Wang J, Travanty EA, Nicholls JM, Peiris JSM, Mason RJ, Chan MCW. Viral replication and innate host responses in primary human alveolar epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages infected with influenza H5N1 and H1N1 viruses. J Virol 85: 6844–6855, 2011. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02200-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 423.Woods PS, Kimmig LM, Sun KA, Meliton AY, Shamaa OR, Tian Y, Cetin-Atalay R, Sharp WW, Hamanaka RB, Mutlu GM. HIF-1α induces glycolytic reprograming in tissue-resident alveolar macrophages to promote cell survival during acute lung injury. Elife 11, 2022. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77457. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 424.Gao X, Zhu B, Wu Y, Li C, Zhou X, Tang J, Sun J. TFAM-Dependent Mitochondrial Metabolism Is Required for Alveolar Macrophage Maintenance and Homeostasis. J Immunol 208: 1456–1466, 2022. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 425.Malik G, Zhou Y. Innate Immune Sensing of Influenza A Virus. Viruses 12, 2020. doi: 10.3390/v12070755. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 426.Benne CA, Benaissa-Trouw B, van Strijp JA, Kraaijeveld CA, van Iwaarden JF. Surfactant protein A, but not surfactant protein D, is an opsonin for influenza A virus phagocytosis by rat alveolar macrophages. Eur J Immunol 27: 886–890, 1997. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830270413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 427.Martinez FO, Helming L, Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol 27: 451–483, 2009. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 428.Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nature Reviews Immunology 11: 723–737, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nri3073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 429.Ma L, Li Q, Cai S, Peng H, Huyan T, Yang H. The role of NK cells in fighting the virus infection and sepsis. Int J Med Sci 18: 3236–3248, 2021. doi: 10.7150/ijms.59898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 430.Arish M, Sun J. Monocyte and macrophage function in respiratory viral infections. Animal Diseases 3: 30, 2023. doi: 10.1186/s44149-023-00095-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 431.Oldstone MBA, Teijaro JR, Walsh KB, Rosen H. Dissecting influenza virus pathogenesis uncovers a novel chemical approach to combat the infection. Virology 435: 92–101, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.09.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 432.Friesenhagen J, Boergeling Y, Hrincius E, Ludwig S, Roth J, Viemann D. Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses inhibit effective immune responses of human blood-derived macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 92: 11–20, 2012. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0911479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 433.Haddad IY, Pataki G, Hu P, Galliani C, Beckman JS, Matalon S. Quantitation of nitrotyrosine levels in lung sections of patients and animals with acute lung injury. J Clin Invest 94: 2407–2413, 1994. doi: 10.1172/JCI117607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 434.Haddad IY, Crow JP, Hu P, Ye Y, Beckman J, Matalon S. Concurrent generation of nitric oxide and superoxide damages surfactant protein A. Am J Physiol 267: L242–249, 1994. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1994.267.3.L242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 435.Wang J, Nikrad MP, Travanty EA, Zhou B, Phang T, Gao B, Alford T, Ito Y, Nahreini P, Hartshorn K, Wentworth D, Dinarello CA, Mason RJ. Innate immune response of human alveolar macrophages during influenza A infection. PLoS One 7: e29879, 2012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 436.Niu J, Meng G. Roles and Mechanisms of NLRP3 in Influenza Viral Infection. Viruses 15, 2023. doi: 10.3390/v15061339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 437.van de Veerdonk FL, Netea MG, Dinarello CA, Joosten LAB. Inflammasome activation and IL-1β and IL-18 processing during infection. Trends Immunol 32: 110–116, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 438.Pang IK, Iwasaki A. Inflammasomes as mediators of immunity against influenza virus. Trends Immunol 32: 34–41, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2010.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 439.Wei L, Wang X, Zhou H. Interaction among inflammasome, PANoptosise, and innate immune cells in infection of influenza virus: Updated review. Immun Inflamm Dis 11: e997, 2023. doi: 10.1002/iid3.997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 440.Chen W, Calvo PA, Malide D, Gibbs J, Schubert U, Bacik I, Basta S, O’Neill R, Schickli J, Palese P, Henklein P, Bennink JR, Yewdell JW. A novel influenza A virus mitochondrial protein that induces cell death. Nat Med 7: 1306–1312, 2001. doi: 10.1038/nm1201-1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 441.Lin R, Porto BN. Pyroptosis in Respiratory Virus Infections: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms, Pathophysiology, and Potential Therapeutic Interventions. Microorganisms 13, 2025. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13092109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 442.Eltaib L, Alanazi MN, Khan Y, Hanbashi A, Khan G, Rikabi HA, Maqbool M, Hussain MS. PANoptosis in Cytokine Release Syndrome: Bridging the Gap between Inflammation and Cell Death. . [Google Scholar]
- 443.Kim HM, Kang YM, Ku KB, Park EH, Yum J, Kim JC, Jin SY, Lee JS, Kim HS, Seo SH. The severe pathogenicity of alveolar macrophage-depleted ferrets infected with 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. Virology 444: 394–403, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 444.Brom VC, Burger C, Wirtz DC, Schildberg FA. The Role of Immune Checkpoint Molecules on Macrophages in Cancer, Infection, and Autoimmune Pathologies. Front Immunol 13: 837645, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.837645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 445.Yang Y, Zhang W, Lan P. Immune Checkpoint and Other Receptor-Ligand Pairs Modulating Macrophages in Cancer: Present and Prospects. Cancers (Basel) 14, 2022. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 446.Patton MJ, Gaggar A, Might M, Erdmann N, Orihuela CJ, Harrod KS. Community-acquired bacterial coinfections and COVID-19. Physiol Rev 104: 1–21, 2024. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00010.2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 447.Netea MG, Quintin J, van der Meer JWM. Trained immunity: a memory for innate host defense. Cell Host Microbe 9: 355–361, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 448.Saeed S, Quintin J, Kerstens HHD, Rao NA, Aghajanirefah A, Matarese F, Cheng S-C, Ratter J, Berentsen K, van der Ent MA, Sharifi N, Janssen-Megens EM, Ter Huurne M, Mandoli A, van Schaik T, Ng A, Burden F, Downes K, Frontini M, Kumar V, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Ouwehand WH, van der Meer JWM, Joosten LAB, Wijmenga C, Martens JHA, Xavier RJ, Logie C, Netea MG, Stunnenberg HG. Epigenetic programming of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and trained innate immunity. Science 345: 1251086, 2014. doi: 10.1126/science.1251086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 449.van der Heijden CDCC, Noz MP, Joosten LAB, Netea MG, Riksen NP, Keating ST. Epigenetics and Trained Immunity. Antioxid Redox Signal 29: 1023–1040, 2018. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 450.Nakayama Y, Fujiu K. Innate immune memory in macrophage differentiation and cardiovascular diseases. Inflamm Regen 45: 17, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s41232-025-00382-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 451.Han L, Li L, Yao L, Bu H, Tian Y, Li Q, Zhu K, Yao H, Wang X, Qian M, Lu W, Sun J. H3K27me3 modulates trained immunity of monocytes in HDM-allergic diseases. Front Immunol 16: 1572796, 2025. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1572796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 452.Biswas SK, Lopez-Collazo E. Endotoxin tolerance: new mechanisms, molecules and clinical significance. Trends Immunol 30: 475–487, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 453.Collins PE, Carmody RJ. The Regulation of Endotoxin Tolerance and its Impact on Macrophage Activation. Crit Rev Immunol 35: 293–323, 2015. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.2015015495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 454.López-Collazo E, Del Fresno C. Endotoxin tolerance and trained immunity: breaking down immunological memory barriers. Front Immunol 15: 1393283, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 455.Wang T, Zhang J, Wang Y, Li Y, Wang L, Yu Y, Yao Y. Influenza-trained mucosal-resident alveolar macrophages confer long-term antitumor immunity in the lungs. Nature Immunology 24: 423–438, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01428-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 456.Rogovskii V Immune Tolerance as the Physiologic Counterpart of Chronic Inflammation. Front Immunol 11: 2061, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 457.Barnig C, Bezema T, Calder PC, Charloux A, Frossard N, Garssen J, Haworth O, Dilevskaya K, Levi-Schaffer F, Lonsdorfer E, Wauben M, Kraneveld AD, Te Velde AA. Activation of Resolution Pathways to Prevent and Fight Chronic Inflammation: Lessons From Asthma and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front Immunol 10: 1699, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 458.Serhan CN, Brain SD, Buckley CD, Gilroy DW, Haslett C, O’Neill LAJ, Perretti M, Rossi AG, Wallace JL. Resolution of inflammation: state of the art, definitions and terms. FASEB J 21: 325–332, 2007. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7227rev. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 459.Serhan CN, Petasis NA. Resolvins and protectins in inflammation resolution. Chem Rev 111: 5922–5943, 2011. doi: 10.1021/cr100396c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 460.Kohli P, Levy BD. Resolvins and protectins: mediating solutions to inflammation. Br J Pharmacol 158: 960–971, 2009. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00290.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 461.Shen C, Fan X, Mao Y, Jiang J. Amphiregulin in lung diseases: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 103: e37292, 2024. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 462.Chaudhary NI, Roth GJ, Hilberg F, Müller-Quernheim J, Prasse A, Zissel G, Schnapp A, Park JE. Inhibition of PDGF, VEGF and FGF signalling attenuates fibrosis. European Respiratory Journal 29: 976–985, 2007. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00152106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 463.Yang L, Kwon J, Popov Y, Gajdos GB, Ordog T, Brekken RA, Mukhopadhyay D, Schuppan D, Bi Y, Simonetto D, Shah VH. Vascular endothelial growth factor promotes fibrosis resolution and repair in mice. Gastroenterology 146: 1339–1350.e1, 2014. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 464.Zhao G, Xue L, Weiner AI, Gong N, Adams-Tzivelekidis S, Wong J, Gentile ME, Nottingham AN, Basil MC, Lin SM, Niethamer TK, Diamond JM, Bermudez CA, Cantu E, Han X, Cao Y, Alameh M-G, Weissman D, Morrisey EE, Mitchell MJ, Vaughan AE. TGF-βR2 signaling coordinates pulmonary vascular repair after viral injury in mice and human tissue. Sci Transl Med 16: eadg6229, 2024. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adg6229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 465.Hsu C-Y, Faisal Mutee A, Porras S, Pineda I, Ahmed Mustafa M, J Saadh M, Adil M, H A Z. Amphiregulin in infectious diseases: Role, mechanism, and potential therapeutic targets. Microb Pathog 186: 106463, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 466.Herold S, Becker C, Ridge KM, Budinger GRS. Influenza virus-induced lung injury: pathogenesis and implications for treatment. European Respiratory Journal 45: 1463–1478, 2015. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00186214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 467.Kaiser KA, Loffredo LF, Santos-Alexis K de L, Ringham OR, Arpaia N. Regulation of the alveolar regenerative niche by amphiregulin-producing regulatory T cells. J Exp Med 220, 2023. doi: 10.1084/jem.20221462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 468.Whitsett JA, Wert SE, Weaver TE. Alveolar surfactant homeostasis and the pathogenesis of pulmonary disease. Annu Rev Med 61: 105–119, 2010. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.60.041807.123500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 469.Soni S, Antonescu L, Ro K, Horowitz JC, Mebratu YA, Nho RS. Influenza, SARS-CoV-2, and Their Impact on Chronic Lung Diseases and Fibrosis: Exploring Therapeutic Options. The American Journal of Pathology 194: 1807–1822, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 470.Kong J, Chen L. Gene expression profile analysis of severe influenza-based modulation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur J Med Res 29: 501, 2024. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02107-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 471.Lan Y, Wang G, Wang Z, Chen Y, Gao F, He W. Alveolar macrophage endosomal-lysosomal system: Potential therapeutic targets for COVID-19. Animals and Zoonoses 1: 276–285, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.azn.2025.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 472.Wang Z, Li S, Huang B. Alveolar macrophages: Achilles’ heel of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 7: 242, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01106-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 473.Lv J, Wang Z, Qu Y, Zhu H, Zhu Q, Tong W, Bao L, Lv Q, Cong J, Li D, Deng W, Yu P, Song J, Tong W-M, Liu J, Liu Y, Qin C, Huang B. Distinct uptake, amplification, and release of SARS-CoV-2 by M1 and M2 alveolar macrophages. Cell Discovery 7: 24, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41421-021-00258-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 474.Hönzke K, Obermayer B, Mache C, Fatykhova D, Kessler M, Dökel S, Wyler E, Baumgardt M, Löwa A, Hoffmann K, Graff P, Schulze J, Mieth M, Hellwig K, Demir Z, Biere B, Brunotte L, Mecate-Zambrano A, Bushe J, Dohmen M, Hinze C, Elezkurtaj S, Tönnies M, Bauer TT, Eggeling S, Tran H-L, Schneider P, Neudecker J, Rückert JC, Schmidt-Ott KM, Busch J, Klauschen F, Horst D, Radbruch H, Radke J, Heppner F, Corman VM, Niemeyer D, Müller MA, Goffinet C, Mothes R, Pascual-Reguant A, Hauser AE, Beule D, Landthaler M, Ludwig S, Suttorp N, Witzenrath M, Gruber AD, Drosten C, Sander L-E, Wolff T, Hippenstiel S, Hocke AC. Human lungs show limited permissiveness for SARS-CoV-2 due to scarce ACE2 levels but virus-induced expansion of inflammatory macrophages. European Respiratory Journal 60, 2022. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02725-2021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 475.Mantovani S, Oliviero B, Varchetta S, Renieri A, Mondelli MU. TLRs: Innate Immune Sentries against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Int J Mol Sci 24, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijms24098065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 476.Kircheis R, Planz O. The Role of Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) and Their Related Signaling Pathways in Viral Infection and Inflammation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 477.Salvi V, Nguyen HO, Sozio F, Schioppa T, Gaudenzi C, Laffranchi M, Scapini P, Passari M, Barbazza I, Tiberio L, Tamassia N, Garlanda C, Prete AD, Cassatella MA, Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Bosisio D. SARS-CoV-2–associated ssRNAs activate inflammation and immunity via TLR7/8. JCI Insight 6, 2021. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.150542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 478.Salvi V, Nguyen HO, Sozio F, Schioppa T, Gaudenzi C, Laffranchi M, Scapini P, Passari M, Barbazza I, Tiberio L, Tamassia N, Garlanda C, Del Prete A, Cassatella MA, Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Bosisio D. SARS-CoV-2-associated ssRNAs activate inflammation and immunity via TLR7/8. JCI Insight 6: e150542, 2021. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.150542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 479.Zhang X, Yang Z, Pan T, Sun Q, Chen Q, Wang P-H, Li X, Kuang E. SARS-CoV-2 Nsp8 suppresses MDA5 antiviral immune responses by impairing TRIM4-mediated K63-linked polyubiquitination. PLoS Pathog 19: e1011792, 2023. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 480.Sahanic S, Hilbe R, Dünser C, Tymoszuk P, Löffler-Ragg J, Rieder D, Trajanoski Z, Krogsdam A, Demetz E, Yurchenko M, Fischer C, Schirmer M, Theurl M, Lener D, Hirsch J, Holfeld J, Gollmann-Tepeköylü C, Zinner CP, Tzankov A, Zhang S-Y, Casanova J-L, Posch W, Wilflingseder D, Weiss G, Tancevski I. SARS-CoV-2 activates the TLR4/MyD88 pathway in human macrophages: A possible correlation with strong pro-inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19. Heliyon 9: e21893, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 481.Yamada T, Sato S, Sotoyama Y, Orba Y, Sawa H, Yamauchi H, Sasaki M, Takaoka A. RIG-I triggers a signaling-abortive anti-SARS-CoV-2 defense in human lung cells. Nat Immunol 22: 820–828, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00942-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 482.Wang M, Zhao Y, Liu J, Li T. SARS-CoV-2 modulation of RIG-I-MAVS signaling: Potential mechanisms of impairment on host antiviral immunity and therapeutic approaches. MedComm Futur Med 1: e29, 2022. doi: 10.1002/mef2.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 483.Vu Manh T- P, Gouin C, De Wolf J, Jouneau L, Pascale F, Bevilacqua C, Ar Gouilh M, Da Costa B, Chevalier C, Glorion M, Hannouche L, Urien C, Estephan J, Magnan A, Le Guen M, Marquant Q, Descamps D, Dalod M, Schwartz-Cornil I, Sage E. SARS-CoV2 infection in whole lung primarily targets macrophages that display subset-specific responses. Cell Mol Life Sci 81: 351, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05322-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 484.Dalskov L, Møhlenberg M, Thyrsted J, Blay-Cadanet J, Poulsen ET, Folkersen BH, Skaarup SH, Olagnier D, Reinert L, Enghild JJ, Hoffmann HJ, Holm CK, Hartmann R. SARS-CoV-2 evades immune detection in alveolar macrophages. EMBO Rep 21: e51252, 2020. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 485.Aristotelous AC, Chen A, Forest MG. A hybrid discrete-continuum model of immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung alveolar region, with a focus on interferon induced innate response. Journal of Theoretical Biology 555: 111293, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 486.Huot N, Planchais C, Rosenbaum P, Contreras V, Jacquelin B, Petitdemange C, Lazzerini M, Beaumont E, Orta-Resendiz A, Rey FA, Reeves RK, Le Grand R, Mouquet H, Müller-Trutwin M. SARS-CoV-2 viral persistence in lung alveolar macrophages is controlled by IFN-γ and NK cells. Nature Immunology 24: 2068–2079, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01661-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 487.Khalil BA, Elemam NM, Maghazachi AA. Chemokines and chemokine receptors during COVID-19 infection. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 19: 976–988, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 488.Zhang N, Zhao Y-D, Wang X-M. CXCL10 an important chemokine associated with cytokine storm in COVID-19 infected patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 24: 7497–7505, 2020. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202007_21922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 489.Coperchini F, Chiovato L, Ricci G, Croce L, Magri F, Rotondi M. The cytokine storm in COVID-19: Further advances in our understanding the role of specific chemokines involved. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 58: 82–91, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 490.Julià A, Bonafonte-Pardàs I, Gómez A, López-Lasanta M, López-Corbeto M, Martínez-Mateu SH, Lladós J, Rodríguez-Nunez I, Myers RM, Marsal S. Targeting of the CD80/86 proinflammatory axis as a therapeutic strategy to prevent severe COVID-19. Scientific Reports 11: 11462, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90797-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 491.Shchudro O, Konopkina L. Surfactant protein-A (SP-A) is a novel marker of lung disorders in patients discharged after COVID-19 pneumonia. European Respiratory Journal 60, 2022. doi: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.1953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 492.Vardakas P, Skaperda Z, Tekos F, Kouretas D. ROS and COVID. Antioxidants (Basel) 11, 2022. doi: 10.3390/antiox11020339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 493.Jacob IB, Gemmiti A, Xiong W, Reynolds E, Nicholas B, Thangamani S, Jia H, Wang G. Human surfactant protein A inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and alleviates lung injury in a mouse infection model. Front Immunol 15: 1370511, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1370511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 494.Hönzke K, Obermayer B, Mache C, Fatykhova D, Kessler M, Dökel S, Wyler E, Baumgardt M, Löwa A, Hoffmann K, Graff P, Schulze J, Mieth M, Hellwig K, Demir Z, Biere B, Brunotte L, Mecate-Zambrano A, Bushe J, Dohmen M, Hinze C, Elezkurtaj S, Tönnies M, Bauer TT, Eggeling S, Tran H-L, Schneider P, Neudecker J, Rückert JC, Schmidt-Ott KM, Busch J, Klauschen F, Horst D, Radbruch H, Radke J, Heppner F, Corman VM, Niemeyer D, Müller MA, Goffinet C, Mothes R, Pascual-Reguant A, Hauser AE, Beule D, Landthaler M, Ludwig S, Suttorp N, Witzenrath M, Gruber AD, Drosten C, Sander L-E, Wolff T, Hippenstiel S, Hocke AC. Human lungs show limited permissiveness for SARS-CoV-2 due to scarce ACE2 levels but virus-induced expansion of inflammatory macrophages. European Respiratory Journal 60, 2022. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02725-2021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 495.Beaudoin-Bussières G, Finzi A. Deciphering Fc-effector functions against SARS-CoV-2. Trends in Microbiology 32: 756–768, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2024.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 496.Rodrigues TS, de Sá KSG, Ishimoto AY, Becerra A, Oliveira S, Almeida L, Gonçalves AV, Perucello DB, Andrade WA, Castro R, Veras FP, Toller-Kawahisa JE, Nascimento DC, de Lima MHF, Silva CMS, Caetite DB, Martins RB, Castro IA, Pontelli MC, de Barros FC, do Amaral NB, Giannini MC, Bonjorno LP, Lopes MIF, Santana RC, Vilar FC, Auxiliadora-Martins M, Luppino-Assad R, de Almeida SCL, de Oliveira FR, Batah SS, Siyuan L, Benatti MN, Cunha TM, Alves-Filho JC, Cunha FQ, Cunha LD, Frantz FG, Kohlsdorf T, Fabro AT, Arruda E, de Oliveira RDR, Louzada-Junior P, Zamboni DS. Inflammasomes are activated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with COVID-19 severity in patients. J Exp Med 218, 2021. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201707. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 497.Junqueira C, Crespo Â, Ranjbar S, de Lacerda LB, Lewandrowski M, Ingber J, Parry B, Ravid S, Clark S, Schrimpf MR, Ho F, Beakes C, Margolin J, Russell N, Kays K, Boucau J, Das Adhikari U, Vora SM, Leger V, Gehrke L, Henderson LA, Janssen E, Kwon D, Sander C, Abraham J, Goldberg MB, Wu H, Mehta G, Bell S, Goldfeld AE, Filbin MR, Lieberman J. FcγR-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection of monocytes activates inflammation. Nature 606: 576–584, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04702-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 498.Karki R, Sharma BR, Tuladhar S, Williams EP, Zalduondo L, Samir P, Zheng M, Sundaram B, Banoth B, Malireddi RKS, Schreiner P, Neale G, Vogel P, Webby R, Jonsson CB, Kanneganti T-D. Synergism of TNF-α and IFN-γ Triggers Inflammatory Cell Death, Tissue Damage, and Mortality in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Cytokine Shock Syndromes. Cell 184: 149–168.e17, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 499.Vanderheiden A, Thomas J, Soung AL, Davis-Gardner ME, Floyd K, Jin F, Cowan DA, Pellegrini K, Shi P-Y, Grakoui A, Klein RS, Bosinger SE, Kohlmeier JE, Menachery VD, Suthar MS. CCR2 Signaling Restricts SARS-CoV-2 Infection. mBio 12: e0274921, 2021. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02749-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 500.Vanderheiden A, Thomas J, Soung AL, Davis-Gardner ME, Floyd K, Jin F, Cowan DA, Pellegrini K, Creanga A, Pegu A, Derrien-Colemyn A, Shi P-Y, Grakoui A, Klein RS, Bosinger SE, Kohlmeier JE, Menachery VD, Suthar MS. CCR2-dependent monocyte-derived cells restrict SARS-CoV-2 infection. 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 501.Kosyreva A, Dzhalilova D, Lokhonina A, Vishnyakova P, Fatkhudinov T. The Role of Macrophages in the Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Front Immunol 12: 682871, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.682871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 502.Xie J, Yuan C, Yang S, Ma Z, Li W, Mao L, Jiao P, Liu W. The role of reactive oxygen species in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infection-induced cell death. Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters 29: 138, 2024. doi: 10.1186/s11658-024-00659-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 503.Monsalve DM, Acosta-Ampudia Y, Acosta NG, Celis-Andrade M, Şahin A, Yilmaz AM, Shoenfeld Y, Ramírez-Santana C. NETosis: A key player in autoimmunity, COVID-19, and long COVID. Journal of Translational Autoimmunity 10: 100280, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2025.100280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 504.Krinsky N, Sizikov S, Nissim S, Dror A, Sas A, Prinz H, Pri-Or E, Perek S, Raz-Pasteur A, Lejbkowicz I, Cohen-Matsliah SI, Almog R, Chen N, Kurd R, Jarjou’i A, Rokach A, Ben-Chetrit E, Schroeder A, Caulin AF, Yost CC, Schiffman JD, Goldfeder M, Martinod K. NETosis induction reflects COVID-19 severity and long COVID: insights from a 2-center patient cohort study in Israel. J Thromb Haemost 21: 2569–2584, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 505.Chavez-Galan L, Ruiz A, Martinez-Espinosa K, Aguilar-Duran H, Torres M, Falfan-Valencia R, Pérez-Rubio G, Selman M, Buendia-Roldan I. Circulating Levels of PD-L1, TIM-3 and MMP-7 Are Promising Biomarkers to Differentiate COVID-19 Patients That Require Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Biomolecules 12, 2022. doi: 10.3390/biom12030445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 506.Rutkowska E, Kwiecień I, Kłos K, Rzepecki P, Chciałowski A. Intermediate Monocytes with PD-L1 and CD62L Expression as a Possible Player in Active SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Viruses 14, 2022. doi: 10.3390/v14040819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 507.Huang H-C, Wang S-H, Fang G-C, Chou W-C, Liao C-C, Sun C-P, Jan J-T, Ma H-H, Ko H-Y, Ko Y-A, Chiang M-T, Liang J-J, Kuo C-T, Lee T-A, Morales-Scheihing D, Shen C-Y, Chen S-Y, McCullough LD, Cui L, Wernig G, Tao M-H, Lin Y-L, Chang Y-M, Wang S-P, Lai Y-J, Li C-W. Upregulation of PD-L1 by SARS-CoV-2 promotes immune evasion. J Med Virol 95: e28478, 2023. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 508.Contoli M, Papi A, Tomassetti L, Rizzo P, Vieceli Dalla Sega F, Fortini F, Torsani F, Morandi L, Ronzoni L, Zucchetti O, Pavasini R, Fogagnolo A, Volta CA, Bartlett NW, Johnston SL, Spadaro S, Campo G. Blood Interferon-α Levels and Severity, Outcomes, and Inflammatory Profiles in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Front Immunol 12: 648004, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.648004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 509.Lin QXX, Rajagopalan D, Gamage AM, Tan LM, Venkatesh PN, Chan WOY, Kumar D, Agrawal R, Chen Y, Fong S-W, Singh A, Sun LJ, Tan S-Y, Chai LYA, Somani J, Lee B, Renia L, Ng LFP, Ramanathan K, Wang L-F, Young B, Lye D, Singhal A, Prabhakar S. Longitudinal single cell atlas identifies complex temporal relationship between type I interferon response and COVID-19 severity. Nature Communications 15: 567, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44524-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 510.Kee J, Thudium S, Renner DM, Glastad K, Palozola K, Zhang Z, Li Y, Lan Y, Cesare J, Poleshko A, Kiseleva AA, Truitt R, Cardenas-Diaz FL, Zhang X, Xie X, Kotton DN, Alysandratos KD, Epstein JA, Shi P-Y, Yang W, Morrisey E, Garcia BA, Berger SL, Weiss SR, Korb E. SARS-CoV-2 disrupts host epigenetic regulation via histone mimicry. Nature 610: 381–388, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05282-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 511.Shirvaliloo M Epigenomics in COVID-19; the Link Between DNA Methylation, Histone Modifications and SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Epigenomics 13: 745–750, 2021. doi: 10.2217/epi-2021-0057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 512.Li S, Wu B, Ling Y, Guo M, Qin B, Ren X, Wang C, Yang H, Chen L, Liao Y, Liu Y, Peng X, Xu C, Wang Z, Shen Y, Chen J, Liu L, Niu B, Zhu M, Liu L, Li F, Zhu T, Zhu Z, Zhou X, Lu H. Epigenetic Landscapes of Single-Cell Chromatin Accessibility and Transcriptomic Immune Profiles of T Cells in COVID-19 Patients. Front Immunol 12: 625881, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.625881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 513.Duong-Quy S, Vo-Pham-Minh T, Tran-Xuan Q, Huynh-Anh T, Vo-Van T, Vu-Tran-Thien Q, Nguyen-Nhu V. Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis: Facts-Challenges and Futures: A Narrative Review. Pulm Ther 9: 295–307, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s41030-023-00226-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 514.Zheng Z, Peng F, Zhou Y. Pulmonary fibrosis: A short- or long-term sequelae of severe COVID-19? Chinese Medical Journal Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine 1: 77–83, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.pccm.2022.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 515.Alfaro E, Casitas R, Díaz-García E, García-Tovar S, Galera R, Torres-Vargas M, Fernández-Velilla M, López-Fernández C, Añón JM, Quintana-Díaz M, García-Río F, Cubillos-Zapata C. TGF-β1 overexpression in severe COVID-19 survivors and its implications for early-phase fibrotic abnormalities and long-term functional impairment. Front Immunol 15: 1401015, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1401015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 516.Majidpour M, Azizi SG, Davodabadi F, Akbar-Abad MS, Abdollahi Z, Sargazi S, Shahriari H. Recent advances in TGF-β signaling pathway in COVID-19 pathogenesis: A review. Microbial Pathogenesis 199: 107236, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2024.107236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 517.Regidor P-A, Santos FG, Rizo JM, Egea FM. Pro resolving inflammatory effects of the lipid mediators of omega 3 fatty acids and its implication in SARS COVID-19. Medical Hypotheses 145: 110340, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 518.Regidor P-A, De La Rosa X, Santos FG, Rizo JM, Gracia Banzo R, Silva RS. Acute severe SARS COVID-19 patients produce pro-resolving lipids mediators and eicosanoids. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 25: 6782–6796, 2021. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202111_27123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 519.Serhan CN, Libreros S, Nshimiyimana R. E-series resolvin metabolome, biosynthesis and critical role of stereochemistry of specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) in inflammation-resolution: Preparing SPMs for long COVID-19, human clinical trials, and targeted precision nutrition. Semin Immunol 59: 101597, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2022.101597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 520.Schousboe P, Ronit A, Nielsen HB, Benfield T, Wiese L, Scoutaris N, Verder H, Berg RMG, Verder P, Plovsing RR. Reduced levels of pulmonary surfactant in COVID-19 ARDS. Scientific Reports 12: 4040, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07944-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 521.Martínez-Diz S, Marín-Benesiu F, López-Torres G, Santiago O, Díaz-Cuéllar JF, Martín-Esteban S, Cortés-Valverde AI, Arenas-Rodríguez V, Cuenca-López S, Porras-Quesada P, Ruiz-Ruiz C, Abadía-Molina AC, Entrala-Bernal C, Martínez-González LJ, Álvarez-Cubero MJ. Relevance of TMPRSS2, CD163/CD206, and CD33 in clinical severity stratification of COVID-19. Front Immunol 13: 1094644, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1094644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 522.Li G, Xu X, Sun B, Zuo YY. Biophysical mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2-induced surfactant inhibition. Biophysical Journal 124: 3733–3741, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 523.Domingo M, Faraudo J. Effect of surfactants on SARS-CoV-2: Molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys 158: 114107, 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0135251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 524.Xie K, Zhang P, Li Y, Xia L. The post-COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae: manifestations, mechanisms and treatment strategies. J Thorac Dis 17: 7414–7429, 2025. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 525.Meischel T, Villalon-Letelier F, Saunders PM, Reading PC, Londrigan SL. Influenza A virus interactions with macrophages: Lessons from epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol 22: e13170, 2020. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 526.Califano D, Furuya Y, Metzger DW. Effects of Influenza on Alveolar Macrophage Viability Are Dependent on Mouse Genetic Strain. J Immunol 201: 134–144, 2018. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 527.Su A, Yan M, Herrler G, Becher P. Efficient replication of avian, porcine and human influenza A viruses in well-differentiated bovine airway epithelial cells. Emerg Microbes Infect 14: 2572697, 2025. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2025.2572697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 528.Greaney AM, Raredon MSB, Kochugaeva MP, Niklason LE, Levchenko A. SARS-CoV-2 leverages airway epithelial protective mechanism for viral infection. iScience 26: 106175, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 529.Ryu G, Shin H-W. SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Airway Epithelial Cells. Immune Netw 21: e3, 2021. doi: 10.4110/in.2021.21.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 530.Chen G, Wu D, Guo W, Cao Y, Huang D, Wang H, Wang T, Zhang X, Chen H, Yu H, Zhang X, Zhang M, Wu S, Song J, Chen T, Han M, Li S, Luo X, Zhao J, Ning Q. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Invest 130: 2620–2629, 2020. doi: 10.1172/JCI137244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 531.Merad M, Martin JC. Pathological inflammation in patients with COVID-19: a key role for monocytes and macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 20: 355–362, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0331-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 532.Lee S, Hirohama M, Noguchi M, Nagata K, Kawaguchi A. Influenza A Virus Infection Triggers Pyroptosis and Apoptosis of Respiratory Epithelial Cells through the Type I Interferon Signaling Pathway in a Mutually Exclusive Manner. J Virol 92, 2018. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00396-18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 533.Nicol MQ, Dutia BM. The Role of Macrophages in Influenza a Virus Infection. Future Virology 9: 847–862, 2014. doi: 10.2217/fvl.14.65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 534.Rudd JM, Pulavendran S, Ashar HK, Ritchey JW, Snider TA, Malayer JR, Marie M, Chow VTK, Narasaraju T. Neutrophils Induce a Novel Chemokine Receptors Repertoire During Influenza Pneumonia. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9: 108, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 535.Verma AK, Bansal S, Bauer C, Muralidharan A, Sun K. Influenza Infection Induces Alveolar Macrophage Dysfunction and Thereby Enables Noninvasive Streptococcus pneumoniae to Cause Deadly Pneumonia. J Immunol 205: 1601–1607, 2020. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 536.koch CM. Influenza-induced activation of recruited alveolar macrophages during the early inflammatory phase drives lung injury and lethality. . [Google Scholar]
- 537.Awad K, Shahin NN, Motawi TK, Abdelhadi M, Barghash RF, Awad AM, Kakkola L, Julkunen I. Glucose Metabolism and Innate Immune Responses in Influenza Virus Infection: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Perspectives. Cells 15, 2025. doi: 10.3390/cells15010047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 538.Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu W-C, Uhl S, Hoagland D, Møller R, Jordan TX, Oishi K, Panis M, Sachs D, Wang TT, Schwartz RE, Lim JK, Albrecht RA, tenOever BR. Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19. Cell 181: 1036–1045.e9, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 539.Hadjadj J, Yatim N, Barnabei L, Corneau A, Boussier J, Smith N, Péré H, Charbit B, Bondet V, Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Breillat P, Carlier N, Gauzit R, Morbieu C, Pène F, Marin N, Roche N, Szwebel T-A, Merkling SH, Treluyer J-M, Veyer D, Mouthon L, Blanc C, Tharaux P-L, Rozenberg F, Fischer A, Duffy D, Rieux-Laucat F, Kernéis S, Terrier B. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science 369: 718–724, 2020. doi: 10.1126/science.abc6027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 540.Mudd PA, Crawford JC, Turner JS, Souquette A, Reynolds D, Bender D, Bosanquet JP, Anand NJ, Striker DA, Martin RS, Boon ACM, House SL, Remy KE, Hotchkiss RS, Presti RM, O’Halloran JA, Powderly WG, Thomas PG, Ellebedy AH. Distinct inflammatory profiles distinguish COVID-19 from influenza with limited contributions from cytokine storm. Sci Adv 6, 2020. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe3024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 541.Grant RA, Morales-Nebreda L, Markov NS, Swaminathan S, Querrey M, Guzman ER, Abbott DA, Donnelly HK, Donayre A, Goldberg IA, Klug ZM, Borkowski N, Lu Z, Kihshen H, Politanska Y, Sichizya L, Kang M, Shilatifard A, Qi C, Lomasney JW, Argento AC, Kruser JM, Malsin ES, Pickens CO, Smith SB, Walter JM, Pawlowski AE, Schneider D, Nannapaneni P, Abdala-Valencia H, Bharat A, Gottardi CJ, Budinger GRS, Misharin AV, Singer BD, Wunderink RG, Grant RA, Morales-Nebreda L, Markov NS, Swaminathan S, Querrey M, Guzman ER, Abbott DA, Donnelly HK, Donayre A, Goldberg IA, Klug ZM, Borkowski N, Lu Z, Kihshen H, Politanska Y, Sichizya L, Kang M, Shilatifard A, Qi C, Lomasney JW, Argento AC, Kruser JM, Malsin ES, Pickens CO, Smith SB, Walter JM, Pawlowski AE, Schneider D, Nannapaneni P, Abdala-Valencia H, Bharat A, Gottardi CJ, Budinger GRS, Misharin AV, Singer BD, Wunderink RG, Wagh AA, Hauser AR, Wolfe AR, Thakrar A, Yeldandi AV, Wang AA, Levenson AR, Joudi AM, Tran B, Gao CA, Kurihara C, Schroedl CJ, Horvath CM, Meza D, Odell DD, Kamp DW, Winter DR, Ozer EA, Shanes ED, Bartom ET, Rendleman EJ, Leibenguth EM, Wehbe F, Liu GY, Gadhvi GT, Navarro HT, Sznajder JI, Dematte JE, Le J, Arnold JM, Du JC, Coleman J, Bailey JI, Deters JS, Fiala JA, Starren J, Ridge KM, Secunda K, Aren K, Gates KL, Todd K, Gradone LD, Textor LN, Wolfe LF, Pesce LL, Nunes Amaral LA, Rosenbaum ML, Kandpal M, Jain M, Sala MA, Saine M, Carns M, Alexander MJ, Cuttica MJ, Prickett MH, Khan NH, Chandel NS, Soulakis ND, Rivas OR, Seed PC, Reyfman PA, Go PD, Sporn PHS, Cooper PR, Tomic R, Patel R, Garza-Castillon R, Kalhan R, Morimoto RI, Mylvaganam RJ, Kim SS, Gatesy SWM, Thakkar S, Ben Maamar S, Han S, Rosenberg SR, Nozick S, Green SJ, Russell SR, Poor TA, Zak TJ, Lombardo TA, Stoeger T, Shamaly T, Ren Z, The NU SCRIPT Study Investigators. Circuits between infected macrophages and T cells in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Nature 590: 635–641, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03148-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 542.Wauters E, Van Mol P, Garg AD, Jansen S, Van Herck Y, Vanderbeke L, Bassez A, Boeckx B, Malengier-Devlies B, Timmerman A, Van Brussel T, Van Buyten T, Schepers R, Heylen E, Dauwe D, Dooms C, Gunst J, Hermans G, Meersseman P, Testelmans D, Yserbyt J, Tejpar S, De Wever W, Matthys P, Bosisio M, Casaer M, De Smet F, De Munter P, Humblet-Baron S, Liston A, Lorent N, Martinod K, Proost P, Raes J, Thevissen K, Vos R, Weynand B, Wouters C, Neyts J, Wauters J, Qian J, Lambrechts D, CONTAGIOUS collaborators. Discriminating mild from critical COVID-19 by innate and adaptive immune single-cell profiling of bronchoalveolar lavages. Cell Research 31: 272–290, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-00455-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 543.Wang S, Yao X, Ma S, Ping Y, Fan Y, Sun S, He Z, Shi Y, Sun L, Xiao S, Song M, Cai J, Li J, Tang R, Zhao L, Wang C, Wang Q, Zhao L, Hu H, Liu X, Sun G, Chen L, Pan G, Chen H, Li Q, Zhang P, Xu Y, Feng H, Zhao G-G, Wen T, Yang Y, Huang X, Li W, Liu Z, Wang H, Wu H, Hu B, Ren Y, Zhou Q, Qu J, Zhang W, Liu G-H, Bian X-W. A single-cell transcriptomic landscape of the lungs of patients with COVID-19. Nature Cell Biology 23: 1314–1328, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00796-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 544.Del Valle DM, Kim-Schulze S, Huang H-H, Beckmann ND, Nirenberg S, Wang B, Lavin Y, Swartz TH, Madduri D, Stock A, Marron TU, Xie H, Patel M, Tuballes K, Van Oekelen O, Rahman A, Kovatch P, Aberg JA, Schadt E, Jagannath S, Mazumdar M, Charney AW, Firpo-Betancourt A, Mendu DR, Jhang J, Reich D, Sigel K, Cordon-Cardo C, Feldmann M, Parekh S, Merad M, Gnjatic S. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nature Medicine 26: 1636–1643, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1051-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 545.Li W, Moltedo B, Moran TM. Type I interferon induction during influenza virus infection increases susceptibility to secondary Streptococcus pneumoniae infection by negative regulation of γδ T cells. J Virol 86: 12304–12312, 2012. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01269-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 546.McCullers JA. The co-pathogenesis of influenza viruses with bacteria in the lung. Nat Rev Microbiol 12: 252–262, 2014. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 547.Robinson KM, McHugh KJ, Mandalapu S, Clay ME, Lee B, Scheller EV, Enelow RI, Chan YR, Kolls JK, Alcorn JF. Influenza A virus exacerbates Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia in mice by attenuating antimicrobial peptide production. J Infect Dis 209: 865–875, 2014. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 548.Liao M, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wen Y, Xu G, Zhao J, Cheng L, Li J, Wang X, Wang F, Liu L, Amit I, Zhang S, Zhang Z. Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med 26: 842–844, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0901-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 549.Delorey TM, Ziegler CGK, Heimberg G, Normand R, Yang Y, Segerstolpe Å, Abbondanza D, Fleming SJ, Subramanian A, Montoro DT, Jagadeesh KA, Dey KK, Sen P, Slyper M, Pita-Juárez YH, Phillips D, Biermann J, Bloom-Ackermann Z, Barkas N, Ganna A, Gomez J, Melms JC, Katsyv I, Normandin E, Naderi P, Popov YV, Raju SS, Niezen S, Tsai LT- Y, Siddle KJ, Sud M, Tran VM, Vellarikkal SK, Wang Y, Amir-Zilberstein L, Atri DS, Beechem J, Brook OR, Chen J, Divakar P, Dorceus P, Engreitz JM, Essene A, Fitzgerald DM, Fropf R, Gazal S, Gould J, Grzyb J, Harvey T, Hecht J, Hether T, Jané-Valbuena J, Leney-Greene M, Ma H, McCabe C, McLoughlin DE, Miller EM, Muus C, Niemi M, Padera R, Pan L, Pant D, Pe’er C, Pfiffner-Borges J, Pinto CJ, Plaisted J, Reeves J, Ross M, Rudy M, Rueckert EH, Siciliano M, Sturm A, Todres E, Waghray A, Warren S, Zhang S, Zollinger DR, Cosimi L, Gupta RM, Hacohen N, Hibshoosh H, Hide W, Price AL, Rajagopal J, Tata PR, Riedel S, Szabo G, Tickle TL, Ellinor PT, Hung D, Sabeti PC, Novak R, Rogers R, Ingber DE, Jiang ZG, Juric D, Babadi M, Farhi SL, Izar B, Stone JR, Vlachos IS, Solomon IH, Ashenberg O, Porter CBM, Li B, Shalek AK, Villani A-C, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Regev A. COVID-19 tissue atlases reveal SARS-CoV-2 pathology and cellular targets. Nature 595: 107–113, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03570-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 550.Huang F-F, Barnes PF, Feng Y, Donis R, Chroneos ZC, Idell S, Allen T, Perez DR, Whitsett JA, Dunussi-Joannopoulos K, Shams H. GM-CSF in the lung protects against lethal influenza infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184: 259–268, 2011. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201012-2036OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 551.David C, Verney C, Si-Tahar M, Guillon A. Evaluating the evidence for GM-CSF as a host-directed therapy in respiratory infections. Cytokine 189: 156902, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2025.156902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 552.Bosteels C, Damme KFAV, Leeuw ED, Declercq J, Maes B, Bosteels V, Hoste L, Naesens L, Debeuf N, Deckers J, Cole B, Pardons M, Weiskopf D, Sette A, Weygaerde YV, Malfait T, Vandecasteele SJ, Demedts IK, Slabbynck H, Allard S, Depuydt P, Braeckel EV, Clercq JD, Martens L, Dupont S, Seurinck R, Vandamme N, Haerynck F, Roychowdhury DF, Vandekerckhove L, Guilliams M, Tavernier SJ, Lambrecht BN. Loss of GM-CSF-dependent instruction of alveolar macrophages in COVID-19 provides a rationale for inhaled GM-CSF treatment. Cell Reports Medicine 3: 100833, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 553.Mukundan L, Odegaard JI, Morel CR, Heredia JE, Mwangi JW, Ricardo-Gonzalez RR, Goh YPS, Eagle AR, Dunn SE, Awakuni JUH, Nguyen KD, Steinman L, Michie SA, Chawla A. PPAR-delta senses and orchestrates clearance of apoptotic cells to promote tolerance. Nat Med 15: 1266–1272, 2009. doi: 10.1038/nm.2048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 554.Huang H, Li G, He Y, Chen J, Yan J, Zhang Q, Li L, Cai X. Cellular succinate metabolism and signaling in inflammation: implications for therapeutic intervention. Front Immunol 15: 1404441, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1404441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 555.Novakovic B, Habibi E, Wang S-Y, Arts RJW, Davar R, Megchelenbrink W, Kim B, Kuznetsova T, Kox M, Zwaag J, Matarese F, van Heeringen SJ, Janssen-Megens EM, Sharifi N, Wang C, Keramati F, Schoonenberg V, Flicek P, Clarke L, Pickkers P, Heath S, Gut I, Netea MG, Martens JHA, Logie C, Stunnenberg HG. β-Glucan Reverses the Epigenetic State of LPS-Induced Immunological Tolerance. Cell 167: 1354–1368.e14, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 556.Gjyrezi A, Skarlis C, Mavragani C, Giannakakou P. Crossroads between autoimmunity and cancer: underlying mechanisms and clinical implications. Physiol Rev 106: 891–933, 2026. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00012.2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 557.Meijers WC, Aboumsallem JP, Lyon AR, Moslehi J, de Boer RA. Forward and reverse cardio-oncology. Physiol Rev 106: 587–644, 2026. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 558.Noh M, Sim JY, Kim J, Ahn JH, Min H-Y, Lee J-U, Park J-S, Jeong JY, Lee JY, Lee SY, Lee H-J, Park C-S, Lee H-Y. Particulate matter-induced metabolic recoding of epigenetics in macrophages drives pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Hazard Mater 464: 132932, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 559.Afthab M, Hambo S, Kim H, Alhamad A, Harb H. Particulate matter-induced epigenetic modifications and lung complications. Eur Respir Rev 33, 2024. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0129-2024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 560.Gavito-Covarrubias D, Ramírez-Díaz I, Guzmán-Linares J, Limón ID, Manuel-Sánchez DM, Molina-Herrera A, Coral-García MÁ, Anastasio E, Anaya-Hernández A, López-Salazar P, Juárez-Díaz G, Martínez-Juárez J, Torres-Jácome J, Albarado-Ibáñez A, Martínez-Laguna Y, Morán C, Rubio K. Epigenetic mechanisms of particulate matter exposure: air pollution and hazards on human health. Front Genet 14: 1306600, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1306600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 561.Mukherjee S, Dasgupta S, Mishra PK, Chaudhury K. Air pollution-induced epigenetic changes: disease development and a possible link with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28: 55981–56002, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16056-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 562.Cardenas A, Fadadu RP, Koppelman GH. Epigenome-wide association studies of allergic disease and the environment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 152: 582–590, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 563.Marín-Palma D, Fernandez GJ, Ruiz-Saenz J, Taborda NA, Rugeles MT, Hernandez JC. Particulate matter impairs immune system function by up-regulating inflammatory pathways and decreasing pathogen response gene expression. Scientific Reports 13: 12773, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39921-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 564.Chen S, Yang J, Wei Y, Wei X. Epigenetic regulation of macrophages: from homeostasis maintenance to host defense. Cellular & Molecular Immunology 17: 36–49, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41423-019-0315-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 565.Daskalaki MG, Lapi I, Hurst AE, Al-Qahtani A, Vergadi E, Tsatsanis C. Epigenetic and metabolic regulation of macrophage responsiveness and memory. . [Google Scholar]
- 566.Regueiro V, Moranta D, Campos MA, Margareto J, Garmendia J, Bengoechea JA. Klebsiella pneumoniae increases the levels of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in human airway epithelial cells. Infect Immun 77: 714–724, 2009. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00852-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 567.Poe SL, Arora M, Oriss TB, Yarlagadda M, Isse K, Khare A, Levy DE, Lee JS, Mallampalli RK, Chan YR, Ray A, Ray P. STAT1-regulated lung MDSC-like cells produce IL-10 and efferocytose apoptotic neutrophils with relevance in resolution of bacterial pneumonia. Mucosal Immunol 6: 189–199, 2013. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 568.Jeong S, Park SA, Park I, Kim P, Cho NH, Hyun JW, Hyun Y-M. PM2.5 Exposure in the Respiratory System Induces Distinct Inflammatory Signaling in the Lung and the Liver of Mice. J Immunol Res 2019: 3486841, 2019. doi: 10.1155/2019/3486841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 569.Arias-Pérez RD, Taborda NA, Gómez DM, Narvaez JF, Porras J, Hernandez JC. Inflammatory effects of particulate matter air pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27: 42390–42404, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10574-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 570.González D, Infante A, López L, Ceschin D, Fernández-Sanchez MJ, Cañas A, Zafra-Mejía C, Rojas A. Airborne fine particulate matter exposure induces transcriptomic alterations resembling asthmatic signatures: insights from integrated omics analysis. Environ Epigenet 11: dvae026, 2024. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvae026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 571.Zou Y, Huang F, Sun J, Zheng Y, Dai G, Wang T, Zhu C, Yan Y, Wang R, Chen Z. The role of IFN-γ/CXCL10 axis in Mycoplasma pneumonia infection. Scientific Reports 15: 2671, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84969-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 572.Borchsenius SN, Vishnyakov IE, Chernova OA, Chernov VM, Barlev NA. Effects of Mycoplasmas on the Host Cell Signaling Pathways. Pathogens 9, 2020. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9040308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 573.Shen X, Jin Z, Chen X, Wang Z, Yi L, Ou Y, Gong L, Zhu C, Xu G, Wang Y. Single-cell transcriptome atlas revealed bronchoalveolar immune features related to disease severity in pediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. MedComm (2020) 5: e748, 2024. doi: 10.1002/mco2.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 574.Bossel Ben-Moshe N, Hen-Avivi S, Levitin N, Yehezkel D, Oosting M, Joosten LAB, Netea MG, Avraham R. Predicting bacterial infection outcomes using single cell RNA-sequencing analysis of human immune cells. Nat Commun 10: 3266, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11257-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 575.Nishimura M, Takahashi K, Hosokawa M. Recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing of bacteria: Techniques, challenges, and applications. J Biosci Bioeng 139: 341–346, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2025.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 576.Luo G, Gao Q, Zhang S, Yan B. Probing infectious disease by single-cell RNA sequencing: Progresses and perspectives. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 18: 2962–2971, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 577.Xiao K, Cao Y, Han Z, Zhang Y, Luu LDW, Chen L, Yan P, Chen W, Wang J, Liang Y, Shi X, Wang X, Wang F, Hu Y, Wen Z, Chen Y, Yang Y, Yu H, Xie L, Wang Y. A pan-immune panorama of bacterial pneumonia revealed by a large-scale single-cell transcriptome atlas. Signal Transduct Target Ther 10: 5, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02093-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 578.Pánisová E, Unger WWJ, Berger C, Meyer Sauteur PM. Mycoplasma pneumoniae-Specific IFN-γ-Producing CD4(+) Effector-Memory T Cells Correlate with Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 64: 143–146, 2021. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0237LE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 579.Cong B, Dong X, Yang Z, Yu P, Chai Y, Liu J, Zhang M, Zang Y, Kang J, Feng Y, Liu Y, Feng W, Wang D, Deng W, Li F, Song Z, Wang Z, Chen X, Qin H, Yu Q, Li Z, Liu S, Xu X, Zhong N, Ren X, Qin C, Liu L, Wang J, Cao X. Single-cell spatiotemporal analysis of the lungs reveals Slamf9(+) macrophages involved in viral clearance and inflammation resolution. Cell Discov 10: 104, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41421-024-00734-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 580.Hume PS, Lyn-Kew KH, Wynn EA, Steinhart B, Driscoll J, Jacobson S, Henson PM, Mould KJ, Moore CM, Janssen WJ. Spatial Heterogeneity of Macrophages in the Human Lung. 2025. [Google Scholar]
- 581.Zhang S, Zhang N, Han J, Sun Z, Jiang H, Huang W, Kong D, Li Q, Ren Y, Zhao S, Jiang Y, Liu P. Dynamic immune status analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection sepsis using single-cell RNA sequencing. Front Immunol 15: 1380211, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1380211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 582.Sheervalilou M, Ghanei M, Arabfard M. Shared blood gene signature in lung adenocarcinoma and microbial lung infections: a bioinformatic analysis and in silico validation. Discov Oncol 16: 1403, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03272-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 583.Song X, Sui C, Lv M, Jiang C, Hu L, Jiang Y, Zhou D, Yang W, Dai C. Dual RNA-seq analysis reveals the interaction between multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and host in a mouse model of pneumonia. BMC Microbiology 25: 450, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04044-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 584.Mertowska P, Smolak K, Mertowski S, Grywalska E. Immunomodulatory Role of Interferons in Viral and Bacterial Infections. Int J Mol Sci 24, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 585.Snell LM, Brooks DG. New insights into type I interferon and the immunopathogenesis of persistent viral infections. Curr Opin Immunol 34: 91–98, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 586.Huang C-H, Laurent-Rolle M, Grove TL, Hsu JC- C. Interferon-Stimulated Genes and Immune Metabolites as Broad-Spectrum Biomarkers for Viral Infections. Viruses 17, 2025. doi: 10.3390/v17010132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 587.Yu J, Shang C, Deng X, Jia J, Shang X, Wang Z, Zheng Y, Zhang R, Wang Y, Zhang H, Liu H, Liu WJ, Li H, Cao B. Time-resolved scRNA-seq reveals transcription dynamics of polarized macrophages with influenza A virus infection and antigen presentation to T cells. Emerg Microbes Infect 13: 2387450, 2024. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2387450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 588.Sheervalilou M, Ghanei M, Arabfard M. Single-cell RNA sequencing in high-burden viral respiratory infections: Decoding immune cell subsets and immune-related differential gene expression. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 135: 105834, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2025.105834. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 589.Muir A, Paudyal B, Schmidt S, Sedaghat-Rostami E, Chakravarti S, Villanueva-Hernández S, Moffat K, Polo N, Angelopoulos N, Schmidt A, Tenbusch M, Freimanis G, Gerner W, Richard AC, Tchilian E. Single-cell analysis reveals lasting immunological consequences of influenza infection and respiratory immunization in the pig lung. PLoS Pathog 20: e1011910, 2024. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 590.Jarboe B, Shubina M, Langlois RA, Boyd DF, Balachandran S. Lung cell fates during influenza. Cell Res 35: 707–718, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41422-025-01163-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 591.Niethamer TK, Planer JD, Morley MP, Babu A, Zhao G, Basil MC, Cantu E, Frank DB, Diamond JM, Nottingham AN, Li S, Sharma A, Hallquist H, Levin LI, Zhou S, Vaughan AE, Morrisey EE. Longitudinal single-cell profiles of lung regeneration after viral infection reveal persistent injury-associated cell states. Cell Stem Cell 32: 302–321.e6, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2024.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 592.Mallampalli RK, Adair J, Elhance A, Farkas D, Chafin L, Long ME, De M, Mora AL, Rojas M, Peters V, Bednash JS, Tsai M, Londino JD. Interferon Lambda Signaling in Macrophages Is Necessary for the Antiviral Response to Influenza. Front Immunol 12: 735576, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.735576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 593.Miao G, Zhao H, Li Y, Ji M, Chen Y, Shi Y, Bi Y, Wang P, Zhang H. ORF3a of the COVID-19 virus SARS-CoV-2 blocks HOPS complex-mediated assembly of the SNARE complex required for autolysosome formation. Developmental Cell 56: 427–442.e5, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 594.Yang P, Rong X, Gao Z, Wang J, Liu Z. Metabolic and epigenetic regulation of macrophage polarization in atherosclerosis: Molecular mechanisms and targeted therapies. Pharmacological Research 212: 107588, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 595.Wu Y, Hu SS, Zhang R, Goplen NP, Gao X, Narasimhan H, Shi A, Chen Y, Li Y, Zang C, Dong H, Braciale TJ, Zhu B, Sun J. Single cell RNA sequencing unravels mechanisms underlying senescence-like phenotypes of alveolar macrophages. iScience 26: 107197, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 596.Li C, Menoret A, Farragher C, Ouyang Z, Bonin C, Holvoet P, Vella AT, Zhou B. Single cell transcriptomics based-MacSpectrum reveals novel macrophage activation signatures in diseases. JCI Insight 5: 126453, 2019. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 597.Sun G, Li K, Ping J, Zhao L, Cui C, Wu J, Xie L, Yao X, Xu G, Ma S, Fan Y, Wang Q, Yang D, Luo B, Liu H, Yang J, Zhang W, Song W, Zhao G, Fu X, Bian X-W, Qu J, Wang S, Chen H, Liu G-H. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas reveals senescence and inflammation in the post-tuberculosis human lung. Nature Microbiology 10: 2073–2091, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-02050-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 598.Choi H, Choi H, Oh J-M, Lee DC. Particulate Matter Induces NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated Pyroptosis in Human Nasal Epithelial Cells. J Rhinol 31: 106–113, 2024. doi: 10.18787/jr.2024.00021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 599.Caceres L, Abogunloko T, Malchow S, Ehret F, Merz J, Li X, Sol Mitre L, Magnani N, Tasat D, Mwinyella T, Spiga L, Suchanek D, Fischer L, Gorka O, Colin Gissler M, Hilgendorf I, Stachon P, Rog-Zielinska E, Groß O, Westermann D, Evelson P, Wolf D, Marchini T. Molecular mechanisms underlying NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β production in air pollution fine particulate matter (PM2.5)-primed macrophages. Environmental Pollution 341: 122997, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 600.Li J, Ghio AJ, Cho S-H, Brinckerhoff CE, Simon SA, Liedtke W. Diesel exhaust particles activate the matrix-metalloproteinase-1 gene in human bronchial epithelia in a beta-arrestin-dependent manner via activation of RAS. Environ Health Perspect 117: 400–409, 2009. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 601.Miao X, Li X, Ma P, Li M, Jiang Y, Wang P, Zhou X, Wang L, Shang P, Zhang Q, Feng F. NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis in alveolar macrophages contributes to ozone-induced acute lung inflammatory injury. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 57: 463–472, 2025. doi: 10.3724/abbs.2024171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 602.Wang J, Huang J, Wang L, Chen C, Yang D, Jin M, Bai C, Song Y. Urban particulate matter triggers lung inflammation via the ROS-MAPK-NF-κB signaling pathway. J Thorac Dis 9: 4398–4412, 2017. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 603.Wang C, Wen J, Yan Z, Zhou Y, Gong Z, Luo Y, Li Z, Zheng K, Zhang H, Ding N, Wang C, Zhu C, Wu Y, Lei A. Suppressing neutrophil itaconate production attenuates Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. PLoS Pathog 20: e1012614, 2024. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 604.Bai R, Guo J. Interactions and Implications of Klebsiella pneumoniae with Human Immune Responses and Metabolic Pathways: A Comprehensive Review. Infect Drug Resist 17: 449–462, 2024. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S451013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 605.Takeuchi O, Hoshino K, Kawai T, Sanjo H, Takada H, Ogawa T, Takeda K, Akira S. Differential Roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in Recognition of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Cell Wall Components. Immunity 11: 443–451, 1999. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80119-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 606.Maeshima N, Fernandez RC. Recognition of lipid A variants by the TLR4-MD-2 receptor complex. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 3: 3, 2013. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 607.Luo R, Yao Y, Chen Z, Sun X. An examination of the LPS-TLR4 immune response through the analysis of molecular structures and protein–protein interactions. Cell Communication and Signaling 23: 142, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s12964-025-02149-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 608.Giordano NP, Cian MB, Dalebroux ZD. Outer Membrane Lipid Secretion and the Innate Immune Response to Gram-Negative Bacteria. Infect Immun 88, 2020. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00920-19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 609.Li X, Kabza A, Ives AN, Thiel J, Waters KM, Qian W-J, Sims AC, Zhang T. Proteome-wide characterization of PTMs reveals host cell responses to viral infection and identifies putative antiviral drug targets. Front Immunol 16: 1587106, 2025. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1587106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 610.Haas KM, McGregor MJ, Bouhaddou M, Polacco BJ, Kim E-Y, Nguyen TT, Newton BW, Urbanowski M, Kim H, Williams MAP, Rezelj VV, Hardy A, Fossati A, Stevenson EJ, Sukerman E, Kim T, Penugonda S, Moreno E, Braberg H, Zhou Y, Metreveli G, Harjai B, Tummino TA, Melnyk JE, Soucheray M, Batra J, Pache L, Martin-Sancho L, Carlson-Stevermer J, Jureka AS, Basler CF, Shokat KM, Shoichet BK, Shriver LP, Johnson JR, Shaw ML, Chanda SK, Roden DM, Carter TC, Kottyan LC, Chisholm RL, Pacheco JA, Smith ME, Schrodi SJ, Albrecht RA, Vignuzzi M, Zuliani-Alvarez L, Swaney DL, Eckhardt M, Wolinsky SM, White KM, Hultquist JF, Kaake RM, García-Sastre A, Krogan NJ. Proteomic and genetic analyses of influenza A viruses identify pan-viral host targets. Nature Communications 14: 6030, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41442-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 611.Laybourn HA, Hellemann Polhaus C, Kristensen C, Lyngfeldt Henriksen B, Zhang Y, Brogaard L, Larsen CA, Trebbien R, Larsen LE, Kalogeropoulos K, Auf dem Keller U, Skovgaard K. Multi-omics analysis reveals the impact of influenza a virus host adaptation on immune signatures in pig tracheal tissue. Front Immunol 15: 1432743, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1432743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 612.Pommerenke C, Wilk E, Srivastava B, Schulze A, Novoselova N, Geffers R, Schughart K. Global transcriptome analysis in influenza-infected mouse lungs reveals the kinetics of innate and adaptive host immune responses. PLoS One 7: e41169, 2012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 613.Bogdanow B, Wang X, Eichelbaum K, Sadewasser A, Husic I, Paki K, Budt M, Hergeselle M, Vetter B, Hou J, Chen W, Wiebusch L, Meyer IM, Wolff T, Selbach M. The dynamic proteome of influenza A virus infection identifies M segment splicing as a host range determinant. Nature Communications 10: 5518, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13520-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 614.Babačić H, Christ W, Araújo JE, Mermelekas G, Sharma N, Tynell J, García M, Varnaite R, Asgeirsson H, Glans H, Lehtiö J, Gredmark-Russ S, Klingström J, Pernemalm M. Comprehensive proteomics and meta-analysis of COVID-19 host response. Nature Communications 14: 5921, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41159-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 615.Apoorva, Shukla A, Kumar A, Singh S, Singh SK. Proteome profiling of human lung epithelial cells unveils distinct patterns of protein expression in response to SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a. The Microbe 6: 100237, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.microb.2025.100237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 616.Feyaerts D, Hédou J, Gillard J, Chen H, Tsai ES, Peterson LS, Ando K, Manohar M, Do E, Dhondalay GKR, Fitzpatrick J, Artandi M, Chang I, Snow TT, Chinthrajah RS, Warren CM, Wittman R, Meyerowitz JG, Ganio EA, Stelzer IA, Han X, Verdonk F, Gaudillière DK, Mukherjee N, Tsai AS, Rumer KK, Jacobsen DR, Bjornson-Hooper ZB, Jiang S, Saavedra SF, Ferrer SIV, Kelly JD, Furman D, Aghaeepour N, Angst MS, Boyd SD, Pinsky BA, Nolan GP, Nadeau KC, Gaudillière B, McIlwain DR. Integrated plasma proteomic and single-cell immune signaling network signatures demarcate mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19. Cell Reports Medicine 3: 100680, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 617.Zhao H, Fei M, Yu W, Geng Z, Bai J, Wang L. Severity-specific immune landscape of COVID-19 revealed by single-cell sequencing. Scientific Reports 15: 29596, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13888-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 618.Messner CB, Demichev V, Wendisch D, Michalick L, White M, Freiwald A, Textoris-Taube K, Vernardis SI, Egger A-S, Kreidl M, Ludwig D, Kilian C, Agostini F, Zelezniak A, Thibeault C, Pfeiffer M, Hippenstiel S, Hocke A, Kalle C von, Campbell A, Hayward C, Porteous DJ, Marioni RE, Langenberg C, Lilley KS, Kuebler WM, Mülleder M, Drosten C, Suttorp N, Witzenrath M, Kurth F, Sander LE, Ralser M. Ultra-High-Throughput Clinical Proteomics Reveals Classifiers of COVID-19 Infection. Cell Systems 11: 11–24.e4, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 619.Shen B, Yi X, Sun Y, Bi X, Du J, Zhang C, Quan S, Zhang F, Sun R, Qian L, Ge W, Liu W, Liang S, Chen H, Zhang Y, Li J, Xu J, He Z, Chen B, Wang J, Yan H, Zheng Y, Wang D, Zhu J, Kong Z, Kang Z, Liang X, Ding X, Ruan G, Xiang N, Cai X, Gao H, Li L, Li S, Xiao Q, Lu T, Zhu Y, Liu H, Chen H, Guo T. Proteomic and Metabolomic Characterization of COVID-19 Patient Sera. Cell 182: 59–72.e15, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 620.Chen H-J, Sévin DC, Griffith GR, Vappiani J, Booty LM, van Roomen CPAA, Kuiper J, Dunnen J den, de Jonge WJ, Prinjha RK, Mander PK, Grandi P, Wyspianska BS, de Winther MPJ. Integrated metabolic-transcriptomic network identifies immunometabolic modulations in human macrophages. Cell Rep 43: 114741, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 621.Sivakumar P, Ammar R, Thompson JR, Luo Y, Streltsov D, Porteous M, McCoubrey C, Cantu E 3rd, Beers MF, Jarai G, Christie JD. Integrated plasma proteomics and lung transcriptomics reveal novel biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res 22: 273, 2021. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01860-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 622.Malla S, Sajeevan KA, Acharya B, Chowdhury R, Saha R. Dissecting metabolic landscape of alveolar macrophage. Sci Rep 14: 30383, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81253-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 623.Fan L, Xu N, Guo Y, Li L. Enhanced insights into the neutrophil-driven immune mechanisms during Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Heliyon 10: e38950, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 624.Chen W-H, van Noort V, Lluch-Senar M, Hennrich ML, Wodke JAH, Yus E, Alibés A, Roma G, Mende DR, Pesavento C, Typas A, Gavin A-C, Serrano L, Bork P. Integration of multi-omics data of a genome-reduced bacterium: Prevalence of post-transcriptional regulation and its correlation with protein abundances. Nucleic Acids Res 44: 1192–1202, 2016. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 625.Yuk J-M, Park E-J, Kim IS, Jo E-K. Itaconate family-based host-directed therapeutics for infections. Front Immunol 14: 1203756, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1203756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 626.Shi J, Cai C. Research Progress on the Mechanism of Itaconate Regulating Macrophage Immunometabolism. Front Immunol 13: 937247, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.937247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 627.Wong Fok Lung T, Charytonowicz D, Beaumont KG, Shah SS, Sridhar SH, Gorrie CL, Mu A, Hofstaedter CE, Varisco D, McConville TH, Drikic M, Fowler B, Urso A, Shi W, Fucich D, Annavajhala MK, Khan IN, Oussenko I, Francoeur N, Smith ML, Stockwell BR, Lewis IA, Hachani A, Upadhyay Baskota S, Uhlemann A-C, Ahn D, Ernst RK, Howden BP, Sebra R, Prince A. Klebsiella pneumoniae induces host metabolic stress that promotes tolerance to pulmonary infection. Cell Metab 34: 761–774.e9, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 628.Lampropoulou V, Sergushichev A, Bambouskova M, Nair S, Vincent EE, Loginicheva E, Cervantes-Barragan L, Ma X, Huang SC- C, Griss T, Weinheimer CJ, Khader S, Randolph GJ, Pearce EJ, Jones RG, Diwan A, Diamond MS, Artyomov MN. Itaconate Links Inhibition of Succinate Dehydrogenase with Macrophage Metabolic Remodeling and Regulation of Inflammation. Cell Metab 24: 158–166, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 629.Li B, Liu J, Cao Y, Wang Y, Wu S, Hu H, Xiao X, Hu J, Wang Q, Wu J, Luo L, Liu Y, Tang Q, Xing Y, Zhang T, Zhou J, Wang L, Yang J, Wang J, Wang C. Multi-omics characterization of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 26: 167, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03250-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 630.Wang F, Barrero CA. Multi-Omics Analysis Identified Drug Repurposing Targets for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Int J Mol Sci 25, 2024. doi: 10.3390/ijms252011106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 631.Blutt SE, Coarfa C, Neu J, Pammi M. Multiomic Investigations into Lung Health and Disease. Microorganisms 11, 2023. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11082116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 632.Wang S, Hu D, Wang R, Huang J, Wang B. Integrative multi-omics and machine learning reveal critical functions of proliferating cells in prognosis and personalized treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. NPJ Precis Oncol 9: 243, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41698-025-01027-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 633.Hussong M, Börno ST, Kerick M, Wunderlich A, Franz A, Sültmann H, Timmermann B, Lehrach H, Hirsch-Kauffmann M, Schweiger MR. The bromodomain protein BRD4 regulates the KEAP1/NRF2-dependent oxidative stress response. Cell Death Dis 5: e1195, 2014. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 634.Oliveira-Nascimento L, Massari P, Wetzler LM. The Role of TLR2 in Infection and Immunity. Front Immunol 3: 79, 2012. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 635.Georgakopoulou VE, Lempesis IG, Sklapani P, Trakas N, Spandidos DA. Exploring the pathogenetic mechanisms of Mycoplasmapneumoniae (Review). Exp Ther Med 28: 271, 2024. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 636.Zubair K, You C, Kwon G, Kang K. Two Faces of Macrophages: Training and Tolerance. Biomedicines 9, 2021. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 637.Shen M, Jiang X, Peng Q, Oyang L, Ren Z, Wang J, Peng M, Zhou Y, Deng X, Liao Q. The cGAS–STING pathway in cancer immunity: mechanisms, challenges, and therapeutic implications. J Hematol Oncol 18: 40, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s13045-025-01691-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 638.Yang X, Wang X, Liu D, Yu L, Xue B, Shi H. Epigenetic regulation of macrophage polarization by DNA methyltransferase 3b. Mol Endocrinol 28: 565–574, 2014. doi: 10.1210/me.2013-1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 639.Esteller M CpG island hypermethylation and tumor suppressor genes: a booming present, a brighter future. Oncogene 21: 5427–5440, 2002. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 640.Zhou J, Zhuang Z, Li J, Feng Z. Significance of the cGAS-STING Pathway in Health and Disease. Int J Mol Sci 24, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijms241713316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 641.Li D, Shi X, Yang Y, Deng Y, Chen D, Chen S, Wang J, Wen G, Liang Z, Wang F, Gao J, Liu Y, Wang D, Liang R, Xu H, Chen R, Chen S, Wang L. Targeting BRD4 ameliorates experimental emphysema by disrupting super-enhancer in polarized alveolar macrophage. Respir Res 26: 46, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03120-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 642.Hoffner O’Connor M, Berglind A, Kennedy Ng MM, Keith BP, Lynch ZJ, Schaner MR, Steinbach EC, Herzog J, Trad OK, Jeck WR, Arthur JC, Simon JM, Sartor RB, Furey TS, Sheikh SZ. BET Protein Inhibition Regulates Macrophage Chromatin Accessibility and Microbiota-Dependent Colitis. Front Immunol 13: 856966, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.856966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 643.Nguyen TH, Maltby S, Eyers F, Foster PS, Yang M. Bromodomain and Extra Terminal (BET) Inhibitor Suppresses Macrophage-Driven Steroid-Resistant Exacerbations of Airway Hyper-Responsiveness and Inflammation. PLoS One 11: e0163392, 2016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 644.Chen L, Zhong X, Cao W, Mao M, Li W, Yang H, Li M, Shi M, Zhang Y, Deng Y, Zu X, Liu J. JQ1 as a BRD4 Inhibitor Blocks Inflammatory Pyroptosis-Related Acute Colon Injury Induced by LPS. Front Immunol 12: 609319, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.609319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 645.Nair S, Huynh JP, Lampropoulou V, Loginicheva E, Esaulova E, Gounder AP, Boon ACM, Schwarzkopf EA, Bradstreet TR, Edelson BT, Artyomov MN, Stallings CL, Diamond MS. Irg1 expression in myeloid cells prevents immunopathology during M. tuberculosis infection. J Exp Med 215: 1035–1045, 2018. doi: 10.1084/jem.20180118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 646.Li L, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Shi Y. C-reactive protein-induced injury in Mycoplasma pneumoniae-infected lung epithelial cells is mediated by the P38 MAPK/mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. Microbiol Spectr 13: e0162624, 2025. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01626-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 647.Saklatvala J The p38 MAP kinase pathway as a therapeutic target in inflammatory disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol 4: 372–377, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2004.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 648.Ren C, Zhang Q, de Haan BJ, Zhang H, Faas MM, de Vos P. Identification of TLR2/TLR6 signalling lactic acid bacteria for supporting immune regulation. Sci Rep 6: 34561, 2016. doi: 10.1038/srep34561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 649.Meshram MA, Bhise UO, Makhal PN, Kaki VR. Synthetically-tailored and nature-derived dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitors: Structural aspects and SAR. Eur J Med Chem 225: 113804, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 650.Sugita R, Kuwabara H, Sugimoto K, Kubota K, Imamura Y, Kiho T, Tengeiji A, Kawakami K, Shimada K. A Novel Selective Prostaglandin E2 Synthesis Inhibitor Relieves Pyrexia and Chronic Inflammation in Rats. Inflammation 39: 907–915, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10753-016-0323-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 651.Scher JU, Pillinger MH. The anti-inflammatory effects of prostaglandins. J Investig Med 57: 703–708, 2009. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e31819aaa76. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 652.Ferreira AV, Kostidis S, Groh LA, Koeken VACM, Bruno M, Baydemir I, Kilic G, Bulut Ö, Andriopoulou T, Spanou V, Synodinou KD, Gkavogianni T, Moorlag SJCFM, Charlotte de Bree L, Mourits VP, Matzaraki V, Koopman WJH, van de Veerdonk FL, Renieris G, Giera M, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Novakovic B, Domínguez-Andrés J. Dimethyl itaconate induces long-term innate immune responses and confers protection against infection. Cell Rep 42: 112658, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 653.Sakai M, Masuda Y, Tarumoto Y, Aihara N, Tsunoda Y, Iwata M, Kamiya Y, Komorizono R, Noda T, Yusa K, Tomonaga K, Makino A. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 screen identifies host factors as potential therapeutic targets for SARS-CoV-2 infection. iScience 27: 110475, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 654.Daniloski Z, Jordan TX, Wessels H-H, Hoagland DA, Kasela S, Legut M, Maniatis S, Mimitou EP, Lu L, Geller E, Danziger O, Rosenberg BR, Phatnani H, Smibert P, Lappalainen T, tenOever BR, Sanjana NE. Identification of Required Host Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Cells. Cell 184: 92–105.e16, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 655.Baggen J, Persoons L, Vanstreels E, Jansen S, Van Looveren D, Boeckx B, Geudens V, De Man J, Jochmans D, Wauters J, Wauters E, Vanaudenaerde BM, Lambrechts D, Neyts J, Dallmeier K, Thibaut HJ, Jacquemyn M, Maes P, Daelemans D. Genome-wide CRISPR screening identifies TMEM106B as a proviral host factor for SARS-CoV-2. Nature Genetics 53: 435–444, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00805-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 656.Corley MJ, Pang APS, Dody K, Mudd PA, Patterson BK, Seethamraju H, Bram Y, Peluso MJ, Torres L, Iyer NS, Premeaux TA, Yeung ST, Chandar V, Borczuk A, Schwartz RE, Henrich TJ, Deeks SG, Sacha JB, Ndhlovu LC. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of peripheral blood reveals an epigenetic signature associated with severe COVID-19. J Leukoc Biol 110: 21–26, 2021. doi: 10.1002/JLB.5HI0720-466R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 657.Ferreira AC, Soares VC, de Azevedo-Quintanilha IG, Dias S da SG, Fintelman-Rodrigues N, Sacramento CQ, Mattos M, de Freitas CS, Temerozo JR, Teixeira L, Damaceno Hottz E, Barreto EA, Pão CRR, Palhinha L, Miranda M, Bou-Habib DC, Bozza FA, Bozza PT, Souza TML. SARS-CoV-2 engages inflammasome and pyroptosis in human primary monocytes. Cell Death Discov 7: 43, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41420-021-00428-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 658.Appelberg S, Gupta S, Svensson Akusjärvi S, Ambikan AT, Mikaeloff F, Saccon E, Végvári Á, Benfeitas R, Sperk M, Ståhlberg M, Krishnan S, Singh K, Penninger JM, Mirazimi A, Neogi U. Dysregulation in Akt/mTOR/HIF-1 signaling identified by proteo-transcriptomics of SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. Emerg Microbes Infect 9: 1748–1760, 2020. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1799723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 659.Finicelli M, Digilio FA, Galderisi U, Peluso G. The Emerging Role of Macrophages in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Potential Impact of Oxidative Stress and Extracellular Vesicle on Macrophage Polarization and Function. Antioxidants (Basel) 11, 2022. doi: 10.3390/antiox11030464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 660.Draijer C, Penke LRK, Peters-Golden M. Distinctive Effects of GM-CSF and M-CSF on Proliferation and Polarization of Two Major Pulmonary Macrophage Populations. J Immunol 202: 2700–2709, 2019. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 661.Stifter SA, Bhattacharyya N, Pillay R, Flórido M, Triccas JA, Britton WJ, Feng CG. Functional Interplay between Type I and II Interferons Is Essential to Limit Influenza A Virus-Induced Tissue Inflammation. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005378, 2016. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 662.Shaykhiev R, Crystal RG. Innate immunity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mini-review. Gerontology 59: 481–489, 2013. doi: 10.1159/000354173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 663.McQuattie-Pimentel AC, Ren Z, Joshi N, Watanabe S, Stoeger T, Chi M, Lu Z, Sichizya L, Aillon RP, Chen C-I, Soberanes S, Chen Z, Reyfman PA, Walter JM, Anekalla KR, Davis JM, Helmin KA, Runyan CE, Abdala-Valencia H, Nam K, Meliton AY, Winter DR, Morimoto RI, Mutlu GM, Bharat A, Perlman H, Gottardi CJ, Ridge KM, Chandel NS, Sznajder JI, Balch WE, Singer BD, Misharin AV, Budinger GRS. The lung microenvironment shapes a dysfunctional response of alveolar macrophages in aging. J Clin Invest 131: 140299, 2021. doi: 10.1172/JCI140299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 664.Sianati S, Schroeter L, Richardson J, Tay A, Lamandé SR, Poole K. Modulating the Mechanical Activation of TRPV4 at the Cell-Substrate Interface. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8: 608951, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.608951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 665.Selezneva A, Gibb AJ, Willis D. The contribution of ion channels to shaping macrophage behaviour. Front Pharmacol 13: 970234, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.970234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 666.Robertson IB, Horiguchi M, Zilberberg L, Dabovic B, Hadjiolova K, Rifkin DB. Latent TGF-β-binding proteins. Matrix Biol 47: 44–53, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 667.Sheppard D Integrin-mediated activation of latent transforming growth factor beta. Cancer Metastasis Rev 24: 395–402, 2005. doi: 10.1007/s10555-005-5131-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 668.Grove LM, Mohan ML, Abraham S, Scheraga RG, Southern BD, Crish JF, Naga Prasad SV, Olman MA. Translocation of TRPV4-PI3Kγ complexes to the plasma membrane drives myofibroblast transdifferentiation. Sci Signal 12, 2019. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aau1533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 669.Segovia JA, Chang T-H, Winter VT, Coalson JJ, Cagle MP, Pandranki L, Bose S, Baseman JB, Kannan TR. NLRP3 Is a Critical Regulator of Inflammation and Innate Immune Cell Response during Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection. Infect Immun 86, 2018. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00548-17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 670.Liu X, Xu Q, Yang X, Heng H, Yang C, Yang G, Peng M, Chan EW- C, Chen S. Capsular polysaccharide enables Klebsiella pneumoniae to evade phagocytosis by blocking host-bacteria interactions. mBio 16: e0383824, 2025. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03838-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 671.Tian J, Song D, Peng Y, Zhang J, Ma L, Chen Z, Liang L, Zhang Z, Yun X, Zhang L. Silica-induced macrophage pyroptosis propels pulmonary fibrosis through coordinated activation of relaxin and osteoclast differentiation signaling to reprogram fibroblasts. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 273: 116106, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 672.Kim SR, Kim DI, Kim SH, Lee H, Lee KS, Cho SH, Lee YC. NLRP3 inflammasome activation by mitochondrial ROS in bronchial epithelial cells is required for allergic inflammation. Cell Death Dis 5: e1498, 2014. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 673.Yadav S, Mehta P, Soni J, Chattopadhyay P, Devi P, Habyarimana T, Tardalkar K, Joshi M, Pandey R. Single-cell RNA-Seq reveals intracellular microbial diversity within immune cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovery. iScience 26: 108357, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 674.Wei J, Alfajaro MM, DeWeirdt PC, Hanna RE, Lu-Culligan WJ, Cai WL, Strine MS, Zhang S-M, Graziano VR, Schmitz CO, Chen JS, Mankowski MC, Filler RB, Ravindra NG, Gasque V, de Miguel FJ, Patil A, Chen H, Oguntuyo KY, Abriola L, Surovtseva YV, Orchard RC, Lee B, Lindenbach BD, Politi K, van Dijk D, Kadoch C, Simon MD, Yan Q, Doench JG, Wilen CB. Genome-wide CRISPR Screens Reveal Host Factors Critical for SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Cell 184: 76–91.e13, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 675.Söderholm S, Kainov DE, Öhman T, Denisova OV, Schepens B, Kulesskiy E, Imanishi SY, Corthals G, Hintsanen P, Aittokallio T, Saelens X, Matikainen S, Nyman TA. Phosphoproteomics to Characterize Host Response During Influenza A Virus Infection of Human Macrophages. Mol Cell Proteomics 15: 3203–3219, 2016. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M116.057984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 676.Munger JS, Huang X, Kawakatsu H, Griffiths MJ, Dalton SL, Wu J, Pittet JF, Kaminski N, Garat C, Matthay MA, Rifkin DB, Sheppard D. The integrin alpha v beta 6 binds and activates latent TGF beta 1: a mechanism for regulating pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Cell 96: 319–328, 1999. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80545-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 677.DuVall MD, Zhu S, Fuller CM, Matalon S. Peroxynitrite inhibits amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents in Xenopus oocytes expressing alpha beta gamma-rENaC. Am J Physiol 274: C1417–1423, 1998. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.5.C1417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 678.Guo Y, DuVall MD, Crow JP, Matalon S. Nitric oxide inhibits Na+ absorption across cultured alveolar type II monolayers. Am J Physiol 274: L369–377, 1998. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1998.274.3.L369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 679.Song W, Matalon S. Modulation of alveolar fluid clearance by reactive oxygen-nitrogen intermediates. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 293: L855–858, 2007. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00305.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 680.Bebok Z, Varga K, Hicks JK, Venglarik CJ, Kovacs T, Chen L, Hardiman KM, Collawn JF, Sorscher EJ, Matalon S. Reactive oxygen nitrogen species decrease cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator expression and cAMP-mediated Cl- secretion in airway epithelia. J Biol Chem 277: 43041–43049, 2002. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203154200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 681.Antosova M, Mokra D, Pepucha L, Plevkova J, Buday T, Sterusky M, Bencova A. Physiology of nitric oxide in the respiratory system. Physiol Res 66: S159–S172, 2017. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 682.Haddad IY, Ischiropoulos H, Holm BA, Beckman JS, Baker JR, Matalon S. Mechanisms of peroxynitrite-induced injury to pulmonary surfactants. Am J Physiol 265: L555–564, 1993. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1993.265.6.L555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 683.Hogg N, Kalyanaraman B. Nitric oxide and lipid peroxidation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1411: 378–384, 1999. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(99)00027-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 684.Sittipunt C, Steinberg KP, Ruzinski JT, Myles C, Zhu S, Goodman RB, Hudson LD, Matalon S, Martin TR. Nitric oxide and nitrotyrosine in the lungs of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 503–510, 2001. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.2004187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 685.Tao G, Liao W, Hou J, Jiang X, Deng X, Chen G, Ding C. Advances in crosstalk among innate immune pathways activated by mitochondrial DNA. Heliyon 10: e24029, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 686.Mu M, Gao P, Yang Q, He J, Wu F, Han X, Guo S, Qian Z, Song C. Alveolar Epithelial Cells Promote IGF-1 Production by Alveolar Macrophages Through TGF-β to Suppress Endogenous Inflammatory Signals. Front Immunol 11: 1585, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 687.Ip WKE, Hoshi N, Shouval DS, Snapper S, Medzhitov R. Anti-inflammatory effect of IL-10 mediated by metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Science 356: 513–519, 2017. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 688.Pervizaj-Oruqaj L, Ferrero MR, Matt U, Herold S. The guardians of pulmonary harmony: alveolar macrophages orchestrating the symphony of lung inflammation and tissue homeostasis. Eur Respir Rev 33, 2024. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0263-2023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 689.Peña-Martinez C, Rickman AD, Heckmann BL. Beyond autophagy: LC3-associated phagocytosis and endocytosis. Sci Adv 8: eabn1702, 2022. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn1702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 690.Upadhyay S, Philips JA. LC3-associated phagocytosis: host defense and microbial response. Curr Opin Immunol 60: 81–90, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2019.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 691.Simmons J, Pittet J-F. The coagulopathy of acute sepsis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 28: 227–236, 2015. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
