Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Jun;49(443):477–482.

Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

G Elwyn 1, A Edwards 1, P Kinnersley 1
PMCID: PMC1313449  PMID: 10562751

Abstract

The second half of the consultation is where decisions are made and future management agreed. We argue that this part of the clinical interaction has been 'neglected' during a time when communication skill development has been focused on uncovering and matching agendas. There are many factors, such as the increasing access to information and the emphasis on patient autonomy, which have led to the need to give more attention to both the skills and the information required to appropriately involve patients in the decision-making process. This analysis, based on a literature review, considers the concept of 'shared decision-making' and asks whether this approach is practical in the primary care setting. This study, and our ongoing research programme, indicates that future developments in this area depend on increasing the time available within consultations, require improved ways of communicating risk to patients, and an acquisition of new communication skills.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (49.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beisecker A. E., Beisecker T. D. Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Med Care. 1990 Jan;28(1):19–28. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199001000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradley C. P. Uncomfortable prescribing decisions: a critical incident study. BMJ. 1992 Feb 1;304(6822):294–296. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6822.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brody D. S., Miller S. M., Lerman C. E., Smith D. G., Caputo G. C. Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Nov-Dec;4(6):506–511. doi: 10.1007/BF02599549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buckman R. Talking to patients about cancer. BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):699–700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681–692. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cockburn J., Pit S. Prescribing behaviour in clinical practice: patients' expectations and doctors' perceptions of patients' expectations--a questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997 Aug 30;315(7107):520–523. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7107.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Apr;2(2):112–121. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coulter A., Peto V., Doll H. Patients' preferences and general practitioners' decisions in the treatment of menstrual disorders. Fam Pract. 1994 Mar;11(1):67–74. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deber R. B. Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information. CMAJ. 1994 Jul 15;151(2):171–176. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deber R. B. Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate. CMAJ. 1994 Aug 15;151(4):423–427. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Degner L. F., Sloan J. A. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Sep;45(9):941–950. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Edwards A., Matthews E., Pill R., Bloor M. Communication about risk: diversity among primary care professionals. Fam Pract. 1998 Aug;15(4):296–300. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.4.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Edwards A., Matthews E., Pill R., Bloor M. Communication about risk: the responses of primary care professionals to standardizing the 'language of risk' and communication tools. Fam Pract. 1998 Aug;15(4):301–307. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.4.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Emanuel E. J., Emanuel L. L. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992 Apr 22;267(16):2221–2226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ende J., Kazis L., Ash A., Moskowitz M. A. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;4(1):23–30. doi: 10.1007/BF02596485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fallowfield L. J., Hall A., Maguire P., Baum M., A'Hern R. P. Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer. BMJ. 1994 Aug 13;309(6952):448–448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6952.448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gorman P. N., Helfand M. Information seeking in primary care: how physicians choose which clinical questions to pursue and which to leave unanswered. Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):113–119. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenfield S., Kaplan S. H., Ware J. E., Jr, Yano E. M., Frank H. J. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;3(5):448–457. doi: 10.1007/BF02595921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guadagnoli E., Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Aug;47(3):329–339. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00059-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hack T. F., Degner L. F., Dyck D. G. Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jul;39(2):279–289. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90336-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Kanani R. Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Lancet. 1996 Aug 10;348(9024):383–386. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01073-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Howie J. G., Heaney D. J., Maxwell M., Walker J. J. A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):165–171. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.2.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huygen F. J., Mokkink H. G., Smits A. J., van Son J. A., Meyboom W. A., van Eyk J. T. Relationship between the working styles of general practitioners and the health status of their patients. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Apr;42(357):141–144. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaplan S. H., Greenfield S., Gandek B., Rogers W. H., Ware J. E., Jr Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Mar 1;124(5):497–504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-5-199603010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaplan S. H., Greenfield S., Ware J. E., Jr Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S110–S127. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kinmonth A. L., Woodcock A., Griffin S., Spiegal N., Campbell M. J. Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team. BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1202–1208. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Little P., Gould C., Williamson I., Warner G., Gantley M., Kinmonth A. L. Reattendance and complications in a randomised trial of prescribing strategies for sore throat: the medicalising effect of prescribing antibiotics. BMJ. 1997 Aug 9;315(7104):350–352. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7104.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Logan R. L., Scott P. J. Uncertainty in clinical practice: implications for quality and costs of health care. Lancet. 1996 Mar 2;347(9001):595–598. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91284-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lupton D. Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Aug;45(3):373–381. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00353-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Marteau T. M. Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. Br J Soc Psychol. 1989 Mar;28(Pt 1):89–94. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McCann S., Weinman J. Empowering the patient in the consultation: a pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 1996 Apr;27(3):227–234. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(95)00830-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Meredith P., Emberton M., Wood C., Smith J. Comparison of patients' needs for information on prostate surgery with printed materials provided by surgeons. Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):18–23. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Miller S. M. Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer. 1995 Jul 15;76(2):167–177. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<167::aid-cncr2820760203>3.0.co;2-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Naylor C. D. Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995 Apr 1;345(8953):840–842. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92969-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ong L. M., de Haes J. C., Hoos A. M., Lammes F. B. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):903–918. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Quill T. E., Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Nov 1;125(9):763–769. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-9-199611010-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Savage R., Armstrong D. Effect of a general practitioner's consulting style on patients' satisfaction: a controlled study. BMJ. 1990 Oct 27;301(6758):968–970. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6758.968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shepperd S., Coulter A., Farmer A. Using interactive videos in general practice to inform patients about treatment choices: a pilot study. Fam Pract. 1995 Dec;12(4):443–447. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.4.443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith R. All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1917–1918. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Smith R. What clinical information do doctors need? BMJ. 1996 Oct 26;313(7064):1062–1068. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7064.1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Street R. L., Jr, Voigt B., Geyer C., Jr, Manning T., Swanson G. P. Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer. 1995 Dec 1;76(11):2275–2285. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951201)76:11<2275::aid-cncr2820761115>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Street R. L., Jr, Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Making. 1997 Jul-Sep;17(3):298–306. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9701700306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Strull W. M., Lo B., Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA. 1984 Dec 7;252(21):2990–2994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Thomas K. B. The consultation and the therapeutic illusion. Br Med J. 1978 May 20;1(6123):1327–1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6123.1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Whelan T. J., Levine M. N., Gafni A., Lukka H., Mohide E. A., Patel M., Streiner D. L. Breast irradiation postlumpectomy: development and evaluation of a decision instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Apr;13(4):847–853. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.4.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Young Marti, Klingle Renee Storm. Silent partners in medical care: a cross-cultural study of patient participation. Health Commun. 1996;8(1):29–53. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc0801_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. de Haes H. C., Molenaar S. Patient participation and decision control: are patient autonomy and well-being associated? Med Decis Making. 1997 Jul-Sep;17(3):353–354. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9701700314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES