Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Jul;49(444):519–521.

Locum doctors in general practice: motivation and experiences.

C McKevitt 1, M Morgan 1, M Hudson 1
PMCID: PMC1313468  PMID: 10621983

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is evidence of dissatisfaction with locum doctors' performance, but little is known about doctors who work as locums in general practice or about their experiences of this work. AIM: To describe the motivations and experiences of doctors providing locum cover in general practices. METHOD: A postal questionnaire survey distributed to locums through organizations such as locum groups, commercial agencies, and general practices. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 111 doctors currently working as locums in general practice. Four main reasons for working as a locum GP were: as a short-term option while between posts, to gain experience of different practices before commitment to one practice, to balance work and family or other commitments, to continue part-time work after retirement. One-quarter of responders intended to continue working as a locum indefinitely. The drawbacks of locum work included frustration with low status, lack of security, and difficulty accessing structured training and education. CONCLUSION: Locum doctors in general practice are a heterogeneous group that includes those who have chosen this type of work. The doctors who intend to continue as locums indefinitely represent a useful resource in primary care whose ability to provide short-term cover could be maximized. The need to control the quality of 'freelance' doctors should not overshadow the need to control the quality of their working environments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (41.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker M., Williams J., Petchey R. GPs in principle but not in practice: a study of vocationally trained doctors not currently working as principals. BMJ. 1995 May 20;310(6990):1301–1304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6990.1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chambers R., Fieldhouse R., O'Connell S. GP non-principals' education: let's improve access for our flexible friends. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Sep;48(434):1551–1552. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Leese B., Bosanquet N. Changes in general practice organization: survey of general practitioners' views on the 1990 contract and fundholding. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):95–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McKevitt C., Morgan M., Dundas R., Holland W. W. Sickness absence and 'working through' illness: a comparison of two professional groups. J Public Health Med. 1997 Sep;19(3):295–300. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES