Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Jul;49(444):541–545.

Measuring progress towards a primary care-led NHS.

P Miller 1, N Craig 1, A Scott 1, A Walker 1, P Hanlon 1
PMCID: PMC1313473  PMID: 10621988

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The push towards a 'primary care-led' National Health Service (NHS) has far-reaching implications for the future structure of the NHS. The policy involves both a growing emphasis on the role of primary care practitioners in the commissioning of health services, and a change from hospital to primary and community settings for a range of services and procedures. Although the terminology has changed, this emphasis remains in the recent Scottish Health Service White Paper and its English counterpart. AIM: To consider three questions in relation to this policy goal. First, does the evidence base support the changes? Secondly, what is the scale of the changes that have occurred? Thirdly, what are the barriers to the development of a primary care-led NHS? METHOD: Programme budgets were compiled to assess changes over time in the balance of NHS resource allocation with respect to primary and secondary care. Total NHS revenue expenditure for the 15 Scottish health boards was grouped into four blocks or 'programmes': primary care, secondary care, community services, and a residual. The study period was 1991/2 to 1995/6. Expenditure data were supplied by the Scottish Office. RESULTS: Ambiguity of definitions and the absence of good data cause methodological difficulties in evaluating the scale and the appropriateness of the shift. The data that are available suggest that, at the aggregate level, there have been changes over time in the balance of resource allocation between care settings: relative investment into primary care has increased. It would appear that this investment is relatively small and from growth money rather than a 'shift' from secondary care. In addition, the impact of GP-led commissioning is variable but limited. CONCLUSION: General practitioners' (GPs') attitudes to the policy suggest that progress towards a primary care-led NHS will continue to be patchy. The limited shift to date, alongside evidence of ambivalent attitudes to the shift on the part of GPs, suggest that this is a policy objective that may not be achieved.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (52.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Capewell S. The continuing rise in emergency admissions. BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):991–992. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7037.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coulter A. Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care. BMJ. 1995 Dec 2;311(7018):1447–1448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Craig N., Parkin D., Gerard K. Clearing the fog on the Tyne: programme budgeting in Newcastle and North Tyneside Health Authority. Health Policy. 1995 Aug;33(2):107–125. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)93672-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Donaldson L. J., Kirkup W., Craig N., Parkin D. Lanterns in the jungle: is the NHS driven by the wrong kind of efficiency? Public Health. 1994 Jan;108(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80029-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Godber E., Robinson R., Steiner A. Economic evaluation and the shifting balance towards primary care: definitions, evidence and methodological issues. Health Econ. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):275–294. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199705)6:3<275::aid-hec255>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harrison A. J. Hospitals in England: impact of the 1990 National Health Service reforms. Med Care. 1997 Oct;35(10 Suppl):OS50–OS61. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199710001-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Howie J. G., Heaney D. J., Maxwell M. The chief scientist reports ... Evaluation of the Scottish shadow fund-holding project: first results. Health Bull (Edinb) 1993 Mar;51(2):94–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kendrick S. The pattern of increase in emergency hospital admissions in Scotland. Health Bull (Edinb) 1996 Mar;54(2):169–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leese B., Bosanquet N. Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics. BMJ. 1995 Aug 26;311(7004):546–550. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7004.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller P. Primary care. Are GP fundholders wasting money? Health Serv J. 1997 Mar 6;107(5543):28–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Robinson R. The impact of the NHS reforms 1991-1995: a review of research evidence. J Public Health Med. 1996 Sep;18(3):337–342. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Scott A. Primary or secondary care? What can economics contribute to evaluation at the interface? J Public Health Med. 1996 Mar;18(1):19–26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Scott A., Vale L. Increased general practice workload due to a primary care led National Health Service: the need for evidence to support rhetoric. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Mar;48(428):1085–1088. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Whynes D. K., Baines D. L., Tolley K. H. GP fundholding and the costs of prescribing: further results. J Public Health Med. 1997 Mar;19(1):18–22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES