Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Jul;49(444):572–575.

Computer support for genetic advice in primary care.

J Emery 1
PMCID: PMC1313480  PMID: 10621995

Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) are under increasing pressure to advise patients about genetic risk. Secondary care lacks the resources to deal with the increasing number of referrals for genetic counselling, and thus recommendations have been made to develop primary care genetics. But for most GPs, genetics is unfamiliar territory. Computers could help general practice to provide a genetics service by simplifying the construction and assessment of family trees and by implementing management guidelines. No programs have been written specifically for primary care genetics, but a range of software exists for secondary care. This paper discusses the types of program already available and how they relate to the needs of primary care. Currently available software offers only elements of the outlined 'ideal' program for primary care and may be too complex for a general practice setting. Most importantly, none provide decision support concerning management based on the level of risk, even though this may be the most valuable element. Genetics is an appropriate area for decision support software in general practice, but it would be wrong to assume that this alone is the key to developing primary care genetics. Additional educational strategies for GPs will be required, and the attitudes of patients to receiving expert advice from a computer must be considered. Current practice computer systems will have to develop so they can communicate with Windows-based expert systems, and changes in existing surgery hardware may be necessary. Existing genetics software provides a starting point from which to derive an appropriate system for general practice. A carefully developed decision-support system could empower GPs to meet the challenge of offering a high-quality genetics service in primary care.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (40.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Als A. B. The desk-top computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desk-top computer; GPs' and patients' perceptions. Fam Pract. 1997 Feb;14(1):17–23. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benichou J. A computer program for estimating individualized probabilities of breast cancer. Comput Biomed Res. 1993 Aug;26(4):373–382. doi: 10.1006/cbmr.1993.1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brownbridge G., Evans A., Fitter M., Platts M. An interactive computerized protocol for the management of hypertension: effects on the general practitioner's clinical behaviour. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 May;36(286):198–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calman K. C., Royston G. H. Risk language and dialects. BMJ. 1997 Oct 11;315(7113):939–942. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7113.939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang-Claude J., Dong J., Schmidt S., Shayeghi M., Komitowski D., Becher H., Stratton M. R., Royer-Pokora B. Using gene carrier probability to select high risk families for identifying germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes. J Med Genet. 1998 Feb;35(2):116–121. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.2.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Claus E. B., Risch N., Thompson W. D. Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Feb;48(2):232–242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Curtis D. A program to draw pedigrees using LINKAGE or LINKSYS data files. Ann Hum Genet. 1990 Oct;54(Pt 4):365–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1990.tb00390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Emery J. Familial breast cancer. Fam Pract. 1997 Oct;14(5):422–422. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.5.422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fischer C., Schweigert S., Spreckelsen C., Vogel F. Programs, databases, and expert systems for human geneticists--a survey. Hum Genet. 1996 Feb;97(2):129–137. doi: 10.1007/BF02265253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gail M. H., Brinton L. A., Byar D. P., Corle D. K., Green S. B., Schairer C., Mulvihill J. J. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Dec 20;81(24):1879–1886. doi: 10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harper P. Science and Technology Committee's report on genetics. BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):275–276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harris R., Harris H. Genetics in primary care. Report on workshop of EC Concerted Action on Genetics Services in Europe (CAGSE) in association with the Royal College of GP Spring Meeting, Blackpool, UK, 28 April 1995. J Med Genet. 1996 Apr;33(4):346–348. doi: 10.1136/jmg.33.4.346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnston M. E., Langton K. B., Haynes R. B., Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jan 15;120(2):135–142. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-2-199401150-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kay C., Harris H., Harris R. Genetic testing. Lancet. 1996 Mar 9;347(9002):686–686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lathrop G. M., Lalouel J. M. Easy calculations of lod scores and genetic risks on small computers. Am J Hum Genet. 1984 Mar;36(2):460–465. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McDowell I., Newell C., Rosser W. Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1989 Apr;28(4):420–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mennie M., Campbell H., Liston W. A., Brock D. J. Attitudes of general practitioners to screening for cystic fibrosis. J Med Screen. 1998;5(1):11–15. doi: 10.1136/jms.5.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rose P. W., Suchard M. A. Screening people with a family history of cancer. Taking a family history in primary care is important. BMJ. 1997 Nov 15;315(7118):1306–1306. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rosser W. W., Hutchison B. G., McDowell I., Newell C. Use of reminders to increase compliance with tetanus booster vaccination. CMAJ. 1992 Mar 15;146(6):911–917. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schorderet D. F. Diagnosing human malformation patterns with a microcomputer: evaluation of two different algorithms. Am J Med Genet. 1987 Oct;28(2):337–344. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320280211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Strømme P. The diagnosis of syndromes by use of a dysmorphology database. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1991 Jan;80(1):106–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1991.tb11741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sullivan F., Mitchell E. Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. BMJ. 1995 Sep 30;311(7009):848–852. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7009.848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sweeney B. Genetic advances: great promise tempered with concern. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Sep;47(422):544–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vadher B., Patterson D. L., Leaning M. Evaluation of a decision support system for initiation and control of oral anticoagulation in a randomised trial. BMJ. 1997 Apr 26;314(7089):1252–1256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7089.1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Walton R. T., Gierl C., Yudkin P., Mistry H., Vessey M. P., Fox J. Evaluation of computer support for prescribing (CAPSULE) using simulated cases. BMJ. 1997 Sep 27;315(7111):791–795. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7111.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wyatt J., Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating medical expert systems: what to test and how? Med Inform (Lond) 1990 Jul-Sep;15(3):205–217. doi: 10.3109/14639239009025268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. de Bock G. H., Perk D. C., Oosterwijk J. C., Hageman G. C., Kievit J., Springer M. P. Women worried about their familial breast cancer risk--a study on genetic advice in general practice. Fam Pract. 1997 Feb;14(1):40–43. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES